Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 5
A fundamental purpose of WYSIWYG software is to allow users to edit content in a way that closely resembles its final appearance.
Answer: True
The primary objective of WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) software is indeed to provide an editing interface that visually mirrors the final output, thereby enhancing user intuition and simplifying content creation.
The primary goal of WYSIWYG is to make the editing process more abstract and code-dependent.
Answer: False
Conversely, the primary goal of WYSIWYG is to reduce abstraction and code dependency, making the editing process more intuitive and visual by closely mirroring the final output.
The term 'visual editor' likely refers to software that uses markup languages without visual previews.
Answer: False
The term 'visual editor' is typically associated with software employing a WYSIWYG approach, which provides a graphical interface that mirrors the final appearance, contrasting with editors that rely solely on markup code.
The core concept of WYSIWYG is to make the editing process more abstract and require users to understand underlying code.
Answer: False
The fundamental concept of WYSIWYG is precisely the opposite: to reduce abstraction and the need for users to understand underlying code by providing a direct visual representation of the final output.
What does the acronym WYSIWYG fundamentally stand for in computing?
Answer: What You See Is What You Get
In the realm of computing, the acronym WYSIWYG fundamentally stands for 'What You See Is What You Get,' signifying that the content displayed during editing closely resembles the final output.
Before WYSIWYG technology, text editors provided a visual representation of the final document layout.
Answer: False
Prior to the advent of WYSIWYG technology, text editors typically displayed content using standard typefaces and offered minimal visual cues regarding the final layout. Formatting was achieved through the insertion of control codes or markup tags, rather than direct visual manipulation.
Control codes in pre-WYSIWYG editors were used to visually format text directly on the screen.
Answer: False
Control codes and markup tags in pre-WYSIWYG editors were used to indicate desired formatting, but they did not provide a visual representation of that formatting on the screen. Users had to infer the final appearance based on these codes.
A significant drawback of early word processing markup languages was their universal compatibility across different applications.
Answer: False
A major limitation of early proprietary markup languages was their lack of universal compatibility. Documents created in one word processing application were often difficult or impossible to edit correctly in another, leading to significant interoperability issues.
Bravo, developed at Xerox PARC in 1974, is widely recognized as the first program to feature WYSIWYG technology.
Answer: True
Bravo, created at Xerox PARC in 1974, is indeed widely acknowledged as the pioneering program that introduced WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) capabilities, marking a significant advancement in document preparation software.
The Bravo document preparation program could display text with formatting like justification and different fonts directly on the screen.
Answer: True
The Bravo program was notable for its ability to render text with various formatting attributes, such as justification and different font styles, directly on the display screen, which was a key innovation for WYSIWYG technology.
The Xerox Star system's software is considered a direct successor to the Bravo software.
Answer: True
The software developed for the Xerox Star system is recognized as a direct evolution and successor to the foundational WYSIWYG concepts pioneered by the Bravo software at Xerox PARC.
Hewlett-Packard developed the first commercial WYSIWYG software for presentation graphics in the early 1980s.
Answer: False
Hewlett-Packard developed its first commercial WYSIWYG software for presentation graphics, named BRUNO, in late 1978, not in the early 1980s.
MicroPro's WordStar, released in 1981, offered full WYSIWYG capabilities, including complex layout and graphics rendering.
Answer: False
While WordStar (1981) offered some WYSIWYG features by displaying styled text like bold and italics directly on screen, it did not provide full WYSIWYG capabilities, particularly concerning complex layout and graphics rendering.
The Apple Lisa and Macintosh computers helped popularize WYSIWYG interfaces for a wider audience.
Answer: True
With advancements in display technology, the Apple Lisa and subsequent Macintosh computers played a crucial role in bringing WYSIWYG interfaces to a broader user base, making visual editing more accessible.
The Gypsy software was integrated into Bravo 3 to ensure text printed exactly as it appeared on screen.
Answer: True
The integration of Gypsy software into Bravo 3 at Xerox PARC was a significant enhancement that aimed to achieve greater fidelity, ensuring that the text printed precisely as it was displayed on the screen.
The HP 2640 terminal's bitmapped graphics capabilities were vital for early WYSIWYG applications.
Answer: True
The HP 2640 terminal, featuring bitmapped graphics, was instrumental in the development of early WYSIWYG applications by Hewlett-Packard, as it provided the necessary visual display capabilities.
Pre-WYSIWYG editors like those using markup tags allowed users to directly manipulate layout elements visually.
Answer: False
Pre-WYSIWYG editors, which relied on markup tags, did not permit direct visual manipulation of layout elements. Users had to insert codes and infer the final appearance, contrasting sharply with the visual editing paradigm of WYSIWYG.
What was a common characteristic of text editing before WYSIWYG technology became widespread?
Answer: Users inserted special 'control codes' or markup tags for formatting.
Before WYSIWYG, text editing commonly involved the insertion of special 'control codes' or markup tags to specify formatting. These codes were not visually rendered on screen, requiring users to infer the final document's appearance.
What was a major problem with proprietary markup languages used in early word processing applications?
Answer: Documents were often incompatible and difficult to edit in different software.
A significant issue with proprietary markup languages in early word processing was their lack of standardization, leading to incompatibility problems where documents created in one application could not be reliably edited or even opened in another.
Which program is generally recognized as the first to incorporate WYSIWYG technology, and where was it developed?
Answer: Bravo at Xerox PARC
Bravo, developed at Xerox PARC in 1974, is widely regarded as the first program to implement WYSIWYG technology, fundamentally changing how users interacted with document creation software.
What key feature did the Bravo document preparation program demonstrate?
Answer: It displayed text with formatting directly on the screen.
The Bravo program demonstrated a pivotal feature: the direct on-screen display of formatted text, including justification and varied fonts, which was a significant departure from prior text editors.
Which commercial system is considered a direct descendant of the Bravo software?
Answer: The Xerox Star system
The Xerox Star system, developed subsequent to Bravo, is recognized as a direct commercial descendant, carrying forward and expanding upon the WYSIWYG principles established by Bravo.
Hewlett-Packard released the first commercial WYSIWYG software for presentation graphics in what year?
Answer: 1978
Hewlett-Packard introduced its pioneering commercial WYSIWYG software for presentation graphics in 1978.
What was the initial name of Hewlett-Packard's first commercial WYSIWYG presentation graphics software?
Answer: BRUNO
Hewlett-Packard's inaugural commercial WYSIWYG software for presentation graphics was initially named BRUNO.
How did MicroPro's WordStar (1981) implement WYSIWYG, and what were its limitations?
Answer: It displayed styled text like bold and italics directly on screen, but didn't fully render complex layouts.
WordStar (1981) offered a limited form of WYSIWYG by displaying styled text (e.g., bold, italics) directly on screen. However, it did not render complex layouts or graphics, marking a partial implementation of the WYSIWYG concept.
Which early personal computers were instrumental in popularizing WYSIWYG interfaces for a broader audience?
Answer: Apple Lisa and Apple Macintosh
The Apple Lisa and its successor, the Apple Macintosh, were pivotal in popularizing WYSIWYG interfaces among a wider audience due to their graphical user interfaces and integrated software like MacWrite.
How did the Gypsy software enhance the Bravo 3 program?
Answer: It allowed text to be printed exactly as displayed on screen.
The Gypsy software was integrated into Bravo 3 to improve fidelity, specifically enabling the printed output to precisely match the on-screen display, thereby advancing the WYSIWYG principle.
The Xerox Alto monitor's low resolution contributed to the WYSIWYG capabilities of Bravo by closely matching print output.
Answer: False
While the Xerox Alto monitor's 72 PPI resolution was designed to approximate print output, the statement that its 'low resolution' contributed by 'closely matching' print output is misleading. Early WYSIWYG systems faced challenges due to discrepancies between screen and printer resolutions, and the match was an approximation rather than a perfect contribution solely due to low resolution.
Differences between screen and printer resolutions did not pose a technical challenge for early WYSIWYG systems like Bravo.
Answer: False
Significant technical challenges arose in early WYSIWYG systems due to the disparity between screen resolutions (e.g., 72 PPI) and printer resolutions (e.g., 300 PPI). These differences often resulted in discrepancies between the on-screen display and the final printed output.
Expensive high-end workstations were typically required for early WYSIWYG applications due to hardware limitations on home computers.
Answer: True
The sophisticated graphical processing and display capabilities necessary for early WYSIWYG software were often beyond the reach of typical home computers, necessitating the use of more powerful and costly high-end workstations.
The Apple Macintosh achieved WYSIWYG by using a screen resolution that was an exact multiple of its printer's DPI.
Answer: True
Initially, the Apple Macintosh's design, featuring a 72 PPI screen resolution that was easily scalable to the 144 DPI of its printers, facilitated an effective WYSIWYG experience by ensuring a proportional representation between screen display and print output.
Achieving true WYSIWYG became easier on later Macintosh systems with diverse hardware and varying printer resolutions.
Answer: False
Conversely, achieving true WYSIWYG became more challenging on later Macintosh systems. The introduction of diverse hardware, third-party printers with varying DPI settings, and non-standard display resolutions complicated the precise alignment between screen and print output.
Bitmapped displays were essential for the development and adoption of WYSIWYG software.
Answer: True
The advent and refinement of bitmapped display technology were critical enablers for WYSIWYG software, as they allowed for the rendering of graphics and varied text styles necessary to visually represent document appearance on screen.
The Apple Macintosh's screen resolution of 72 PPI was chosen to approximate the standard resolution of printed pages.
Answer: True
The selection of a 72 PPI screen resolution for the Apple Macintosh was a deliberate design choice intended to align with and approximate the typical resolution of printed documents, thereby enhancing the WYSIWYG effect.
The mention of '72 PPI font metric files' on the Alto monitor suggests an early attempt to approximate print output on screen.
Answer: True
The use of 72 PPI font metric files on the Xerox Alto monitor indicates an early effort to render text on screen in a manner that approximated its appearance in print, a foundational aspect of WYSIWYG development.
How did the Xerox Alto monitor's resolution contribute to Bravo's WYSIWYG capabilities?
Answer: Its 72 PPI resolution closely matched how text would appear when printed.
The Xerox Alto monitor's 72 PPI resolution was instrumental in Bravo's WYSIWYG capabilities because it was designed to closely approximate the appearance of text when printed, providing a more accurate visual preview.
What technical challenge did early WYSIWYG systems like Bravo face regarding screen and print resolutions?
Answer: Differences between screen (e.g., 72 PPI) and printer (e.g., 300 PPI) resolutions caused discrepancies.
A significant technical hurdle for early WYSIWYG systems was the inherent difference between screen resolutions (typically around 72 PPI) and printer resolutions (often 300 PPI or higher), which led to visual discrepancies between the on-screen preview and the final printed document.
How did the Apple Macintosh achieve an effective WYSIWYG system initially?
Answer: By designing its screen resolution (72 PPI) to be easily scaled to its printers (144 DPI).
The initial success of the Macintosh's WYSIWYG system was largely due to its screen resolution (72 PPI) being a direct multiple of its primary printer's resolution (144 DPI), facilitating a consistent visual representation.
What factor made achieving true WYSIWYG more challenging on later Macintosh systems?
Answer: The use of third-party printers with varying DPI settings and diverse display resolutions.
As Macintosh systems evolved to support a wider range of third-party printers with different DPI settings and external displays with varied resolutions, the initial simple scaling relationship broke down, making precise WYSIWYG alignment more challenging.
What was the primary role of bitmapped displays in the adoption of WYSIWYG software?
Answer: They enabled the rendering of graphics and varied text styles needed for visual representation.
Bitmapped displays were fundamental to the adoption of WYSIWYG software, as they provided the capability to render complex graphics and diverse text styles, thereby enabling the visual representation of document appearance on screen.
The acronym WYSIWYG stands for 'What You Suggest Is What You Get'.
Answer: False
The acronym WYSIWYG fundamentally stands for 'What You See Is What You Get'. The phrase 'What You Suggest Is What You Get' is an incorrect interpretation.
WYGIWYG stands for 'What You Get Is What You Get' and is used similarly to WYSIWYG.
Answer: True
WYGIWYG, an acronym for 'What You Get Is What You Get,' is indeed a variation on the WYSIWYG concept, often employed to describe systems where the output is fixed or predetermined, functioning in a manner analogous to WYSIWYG.
Jakob Nielsen used the term WYGIWYS to describe the Microsoft Office 2007 Ribbon interface, meaning 'What You Get Is What You See.'
Answer: True
Usability expert Jakob Nielsen employed the acronym WYGIWYS ('What You Get Is What You See') to characterize the interface paradigm of the Microsoft Office 2007 Ribbon, suggesting a direct correlation between user actions and the visible interface elements.
WYSIAWYG means 'What You See Is What You Get,' indicating a perfect match between screen and print.
Answer: False
WYSIAWYG stands for 'What You See Is Almost What You Get.' This variation acknowledges that WYSIWYG implementations may have slight discrepancies between the on-screen display and the final output, rather than indicating a perfect match.
WYSIAYG implies that the user interface offers extensive features and options.
Answer: False
WYSIAYG ('What You See Is All You Get') typically implies the opposite: that the user interface is restrictive and limits the available options or outcomes, rather than offering extensive functionality.
WYSIMOLWYG acknowledges that WYSIWYG implementations are often not perfectly accurate.
Answer: True
WYSIMOLWYG ('What You See Is More Or Less What You Get') explicitly recognizes that most WYSIWYG systems exhibit minor imperfections or discrepancies between the on-screen representation and the final output.
The acronym WYSINWYW is critically used to suggest that software like Microsoft Word gives users complete control over formatting.
Answer: False
WYSINWYW ('What You See Is Not What You Want') is used critically to suggest that software, such as Microsoft Word, may impose its own formatting logic, thereby limiting the user's complete control and dictating outcomes rather than fully aligning with user intent.
WYSIWYW, associated with platforms like GNU TeXmacs, implies users can customize the platform to behave like manual typesetting programs.
Answer: True
WYSIWYW ('What You See Is What You Want') signifies a high degree of user control, particularly in platforms like GNU TeXmacs, where users can tailor the system to emulate manual typesetting programs, thereby achieving desired output beyond simple visual representation.
WYTIWYG, found in contexts like Ward Cunningham's Wiki, means 'What You Think Is What You Get.'
Answer: True
WYTIWYG ('What You Think Is What You Get') is an acronym associated with systems like Ward Cunningham's Wiki, emphasizing the alignment between a user's mental model and the resulting output.
YAFIYGI is considered synonymous with WYSIWYG, emphasizing intuitive visual feedback.
Answer: False
YAFIYGI ('You Asked For It You Got It') is generally considered the opposite of WYSIWYG. It describes text-command systems that may lack intuitive visual feedback, where the output precisely matches the command given, even if it deviates from the user's intended outcome.
The phrase YAFIYGI was first used to describe text editing systems around 1993.
Answer: True
The acronym YAFIYGI ('You Asked For It You Got It') began to be used in the context of text editing systems around 1993, although its conceptual roots in describing command-line interactions predate this period.
WYSIWYM (What You See Is What You Mean) focuses on the semantic meaning of content rather than just its visual appearance.
Answer: True
WYSIWYM ('What You See Is What You Mean') represents a conceptual shift towards understanding the semantic intent and structure of content, moving beyond mere visual representation, which distinguishes it from standard WYSIWYG.
A hatnote about 'WYSIWYG (disambiguation)' suggests the term has only one specific meaning in computing.
Answer: False
A disambiguation hatnote indicates that the term 'WYSIWYG' has multiple meanings or applications, directing users to a page that lists these various contexts rather than implying a single, exclusive definition within computing.
The phrase 'what you see is what you get' was used by Geraldine, a character played by Flip Wilson, to express self-acceptance.
Answer: True
The catchphrase 'what you see is what you get,' popularized by Flip Wilson's character Geraldine, served as an expression of self-acceptance and unapologetic identity, predating its widespread adoption in computing contexts.
The variation WYGIWYG ('what you get is what you get') is used to describe systems where the output is fixed or predetermined.
Answer: True
WYGIWYG ('What You Get Is What You Get') is indeed used to characterize systems where the output is predetermined or fixed, reflecting a direct correspondence between input and result, similar in spirit to WYSIWYG's emphasis on predictable output.
WYSIAYG ('what you see is all you get') suggests that the user interface provides comprehensive functionality.
Answer: False
WYSIAYG ('What You See Is All You Get') implies a limitation, suggesting that the user interface offers only a restricted set of options or functionalities, potentially constraining users rather than providing comprehensive features.
The WYSIWYM concept emphasizes the user's ability to directly manipulate visual elements on the screen.
Answer: False
WYSIWYM ('What You See Is What You Mean') emphasizes the semantic meaning and intent behind content rather than direct visual manipulation. This contrasts with WYSIWYG, which focuses on the visual representation.
YAFIYGI is considered the opposite of WYSIWYG because it lacks intuitive visual feedback.
Answer: True
YAFIYGI ('You Asked For It You Got It') is often contrasted with WYSIWYG because it typically describes systems, particularly command-line interfaces, that lack intuitive visual feedback and may produce results that align strictly with commands but not necessarily with user expectations.
Where did the phrase 'what you see is what you get' gain popularity before its association with computing?
Answer: As a catchphrase used by Flip Wilson's character Geraldine
The phrase 'what you see is what you get' achieved significant popular recognition as a catchphrase associated with Geraldine, a character portrayed by comedian Flip Wilson, prior to its adoption in the computing lexicon.
What does the variation WYGIWYG stand for?
Answer: What You Get Is What You Get
The acronym WYGIWYG stands for 'What You Get Is What You Get,' representing a variant of the WYSIWYG concept.
Jakob Nielsen used the acronym WYGIWYS to describe which interface?
Answer: The Microsoft Office 2007 Ribbon interface
Usability expert Jakob Nielsen utilized the acronym WYGIWYS ('What You Get Is What You See') to characterize the interface paradigm presented by the Microsoft Office 2007 Ribbon.
What does WYSIAWYG acknowledge about WYSIWYG implementations?
Answer: They might have slight discrepancies between screen display and final output.
WYSIAWYG ('What You See Is Almost What You Get') acknowledges that WYSIWYG implementations are not always perfectly accurate and may exhibit minor differences between the on-screen representation and the final rendered output.
The acronym WYSIAYG ('what you see is all you get') is used to describe situations where:
Answer: The user feels constrained by the interface's limited options.
WYSIAYG ('What You See Is All You Get') is employed to denote scenarios where users perceive the interface as restrictive, implying that the available options are limited and do not fully meet their needs or expectations.
What does WYSIMOLWYG acknowledge about the practical implementation of WYSIWYG systems?
Answer: They may have slight differences or imperfections between the on-screen display and the final output.
WYSIMOLWYG ('What You See Is More Or Less What You Get') acknowledges the practical reality that WYSIWYG implementations often contain minor deviations or imperfections when comparing the on-screen display to the final printed or rendered document.
The acronym WYSINWYW is critically used to suggest what about software like Microsoft Word?
Answer: It dictates the outcome to the user rather than the user having full control.
Critically, the acronym WYSINWYW ('What You See Is Not What You Want') suggests that software like Microsoft Word may impose its own formatting logic, potentially overriding user control and dictating the final output rather than fully reflecting the user's intent.
What does WYSIWYW ('what you see is what you want') signify, particularly in relation to platforms like GNU TeXmacs?
Answer: The platform behaves like manual typesetting programs, giving users greater control.
WYSIWYW ('What You See Is What You Want'), particularly in contexts like GNU TeXmacs, signifies that users can customize the platform to function akin to manual typesetting systems, granting them enhanced control over the final output beyond simple visual alignment.
In what context is the acronym WYTIWYG ('what you think is what you get') typically found?
Answer: Ward Cunningham's Wiki
The acronym WYTIWYG ('What You Think Is What You Get') is notably found in discussions related to Ward Cunningham's Wiki, emphasizing the principle that the rendered output should align with the user's conceptualization.
How is YAFIYGI considered the opposite of WYSIWYG?
Answer: It describes text-command systems lacking intuitive visual feedback.
YAFIYGI ('You Asked For It You Got It') is considered the antithesis of WYSIWYG because it typically characterizes text-command systems that lack intuitive visual feedback, where the output strictly adheres to commands rather than user intent.
What does the hatnote 'WYSIWYG (disambiguation)' indicate?
Answer: The term WYSIWYG has multiple meanings or applications.
A disambiguation hatnote signifies that the term 'WYSIWYG' encompasses multiple meanings or applications, directing readers to a page that clarifies these different contexts.
The mw-parser-output class in HTML typically wraps the main content of a parsed wiki page.
Answer: True
In the context of MediaWiki, the mw-parser-output class is conventionally used to encapsulate the primary content rendered from wiki markup, organizing elements such as text, headings, and lists for display.
The mw-parser-output class in a MediaWiki page's HTML structure typically contains:
Answer: The main content parsed from wiki markup, including text and headings.
The mw-parser-output class in MediaWiki's HTML structure serves to contain the primary content derived from parsed wiki markup, encompassing elements such as text, headings, and lists.