Colorado's Capital Quest
An academic exploration of the pivotal vote that determined the permanent seat of government for the Centennial State.
The Background ๐ See the Results ๐Dive in with Flashcard Learning!
๐ฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ฎ
Background: A Contentious Beginning
Early Capital Choices
The selection of Colorado's permanent state capital was a complex issue, marked by shifting decisions and political maneuvering. Following Colorado's admission to the Union in 1876, Denver served as the temporary capital. However, the state constitution stipulated that a permanent capital would be chosen via a statewide popular vote five years later, in 1881. This provision was a compromise to avoid contention that might jeopardize the ratification of the constitution itself.
The Constitutional Mandate
The state constitution, drafted for admission, deliberately deferred the capital's permanent location to a future referendum. This was a strategic move to prevent any single city's designation from alienating voters statewide. The mandate set the stage for a significant political contest, with Denver, the de facto capital, facing challenges from other aspiring cities.
Historical Precedents
Prior to the 1881 referendum, the territorial capital had been moved several times. Initially chosen as Colorado City (now part of Colorado Springs) in 1861, the legislature soon found its facilities inadequate and adjourned to Denver. The following year, the capital was moved to Golden. Although Golden was the official territorial capital, legislative sessions frequently convened in Denver due to its superior infrastructure. In 1867, the legislature voted to relocate the state government permanently to Denver, but this decision remained contested, leading to the constitutional provision for a definitive vote.
The Contenders: Aspiring Capitals
Denver: The Frontrunner
Denver, by far the largest city in Colorado with a population of 35,629 in 1880, was the clear favorite. Its status as the temporary capital and a major transportation hub, bolstered by the Kansas Pacific Railroad connection established in 1870, provided significant advantages. Businessman Henry Brown offered ten acres near downtown for a new capitol building, a gesture lauded by supporters, though critics noted his personal real estate interests in the vicinity.
Colorado Springs: The Genteel Alternative
Colorado Springs, with 4,226 inhabitants in 1880, presented itself as a more refined alternative to Denver. Founded in 1871, it was rapidly growing and promoted its more genteel atmosphere. Supporters argued that many established states wisely located their capitals away from major commercial centers. Optimism fueled its real estate market, with lots near the proposed capitol site selling at high prices.
Pueblo: A Persistent Bid
Pueblo, with 3,217 residents in 1880, had previously come close to securing the territorial capital in 1874 when a bill passed the territorial house but failed in the senate. The Pueblo Chieftain newspaper advocated for Pueblo, citing its pleasant environment and adequate accommodations for legislators. Despite its smaller size compared to Denver and Colorado Springs, its past bid kept it in contention.
Canon City & Salida: Smaller Aspirants
Canon City, with 1,501 inhabitants in 1880, was primarily a supply point for mining and oil fields and promoted its pleasant climate. It would later be awarded the territorial prison. Salida, founded just the year before the 1880 census, was promoted through its weekly newspaper, the Mountain Mail, which published a distorted map showing Salida at Colorado's geographical center. Neither city possessed the population or infrastructure of the leading contenders.
Notable Non-Contenders
Several other significant towns showed little or no interest in hosting the state capital. Leadville, the second-most populous town in 1880 with 14,820 residents, did not actively campaign. Similarly, Silver Cliff (Colorado's third-largest town) and Golden, the former territorial capital, did not mount serious bids for the 1881 referendum.
Referendum Results: Denver Triumphs
The Vote Count
The statewide referendum was held on November 8, 1881. A total of 45,497 votes were cast. Denver secured a decisive victory, winning 66.48% of the vote on the first ballot, thereby avoiding a runoff. While most cities saw overwhelming support from their local populations, Denver's broad appeal and strategic campaigning proved insurmountable for its rivals.
Official Tally
The official results demonstrated Denver's clear mandate:
Reactions: Accusations and Reflections
Accusations of Corruption
Denver's victory was met with accusations of vote-buying and bribery from its rivals. The Colorado Springs Gazette decried the "terrible political contest in which fraud, corruption and dishonor played so important a part." These sentiments reflected the intense competition and the perceived irregularities common in political campaigns of the era.
A Pragmatic Perspective
The editor of the Salida Mountain Mail offered a more pragmatic, albeit cynical, view. While congratulating Denver, he acknowledged that Denver's substantial campaign spendingโpotentially "thousands of dollars, perhaps hundreds of thousands"โhad inadvertently supported newspapers and citizens across the state. This perspective framed the bribery as a form of economic stimulus, however illicit.
Relief in Defeat
Interestingly, the Pueblo Chieftain adopted a tone of relief after losing the bid. The editor suggested that being without the capital spared Pueblo from the "corrupting influences of a legislative lobby" and protected its citizens from the perceived moral hazards associated with political centers. This reaction highlights the complex attitudes towards hosting the state government.
Historical Myths vs. Reality
Debunking Common Narratives
Over time, local folklore has embellished the history of the capital selection, suggesting that towns like Central City, Cripple Creek, Fountain, Golden, Laporte, and Silver Cliff were serious contenders. However, historical records indicate that many of these claims are unsubstantiated. For instance, Cripple Creek did not exist until 1892, well after the referendum.
The "One Vote" Legend
A persistent myth claims that several towns, including Central City, Laporte, and Silver Cliff, lost the referendum to Denver by a single vote. This narrative, often found on local historical websites, lacks factual basis in the documented election results. The official tally shows substantial vote differences, and the "one vote" story appears to be a romanticized embellishment rather than historical fact.
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "1881 Colorado State Capital Referendum" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
- Carl Abbott, Colorado: A History of the Centennial State, Fifth Edition (Boulder: University of Colorado Press, 15 May 2013).
- Richard Collins and Dale Oesterle, The Colorado State Constitution (Oxford University Press, 2011) 210.
- Robert H. Latta, Denver in the 1880s, Latta Genealogy Newsletter, accessed 2 Oct. 2015.
- "Three-fourths of the vote assured for the Queen City," Denver Rocky Mountain News, 10 Nov. 1881, p.8 c.2.
- Historic Fountain, Colorado, accessed 2 Oct. 2015.
- Wikipedia article for Laporte, Colorado, prior to 31 March 2008.
- Gardner, Colorado, Sangres.Com, accessed 30 Sept. 2015.
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.
This is not professional historical or political advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for scholarly research or consultation with historical experts. Always refer to primary sources and academic analyses for definitive historical understanding.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.