The 1928 Election: A Nation at a Crossroads
An in-depth analysis of the pivotal U.S. presidential election, examining the candidates Herbert Hoover and Al Smith, and the key issues that shaped the outcome.
Election Overview 👇 View Results 📊Dive in with Flashcard Learning!
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮
Election Overview
A Pivotal Contest
The 1928 United States presidential election was a landmark contest held on November 6, 1928. It saw Republican Herbert Hoover, a former Secretary of Commerce, decisively defeat Democratic New York Governor Al Smith. This election marked a significant shift in American political alignment, particularly in the Solid South, and highlighted the cultural and religious tensions of the era.
Economic Context
The election took place during a period of significant economic prosperity in the United States, often referred to as the "Roaring Twenties." The Republican Party, associated with this economic boom, benefited from public sentiment that favored continuity. Hoover's campaign capitalized on this, promising to continue the policies that fostered growth.
Key Issues
Central to the election were the issues of Prohibition and Al Smith's Roman Catholic faith. Smith's opposition to Prohibition alienated many Protestant voters, while widespread anti-Catholic sentiment fueled fears about his potential allegiance to the Pope. These factors, combined with Smith's association with Tammany Hall, presented significant challenges to his candidacy.
Nominations
Republican Nomination
With incumbent President Calvin Coolidge declining to seek re-election, the Republican nomination was highly contested. Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover emerged as the frontrunner, securing the nomination at the Republican National Convention in Kansas City, Missouri. Charles Curtis of Kansas was chosen as his running mate, notable for being the first Native American nominated for Vice President by a major party.
Democratic Nomination
Al Smith, the Governor of New York, secured the Democratic nomination on the first ballot at the convention held in Houston, Texas. His running mate was Senator Joseph T. Robinson of Arkansas. Smith's candidacy was historic as he was the first Roman Catholic nominated by a major party for president, a factor that significantly influenced the campaign.
Campaign Dynamics
Religious Divide
Al Smith's Catholicism was a major issue, exploited by opponents who feared papal influence. Protestant denominations widely expressed concerns, with many ministers and publications warning against electing a Catholic. This religious prejudice, masked as concern for American institutions, significantly impacted Smith's support, particularly in the South.
Prohibition Debate
Smith's stance on Prohibition, advocating for repeal or modification, contrasted sharply with Hoover's support for maintaining the ban. This issue divided voters along regional and cultural lines, with Smith losing votes among dry Protestants who saw Prohibition as a moral imperative, while his wet stance appealed to urban immigrant communities.
Economic Prosperity
The Republican campaign emphasized the economic prosperity of the Coolidge administration, positioning Hoover as the steward of continued prosperity. This message resonated with many voters who attributed the economic boom to Republican policies. Hoover's pledge to eradicate poverty, though later criticized during the Great Depression, was a powerful campaign theme.
Election Results
Electoral College Victory
Herbert Hoover secured a landslide victory, winning 444 electoral votes to Al Smith's 87. Hoover carried 40 states, demonstrating broad national appeal. Smith's victory was limited to the Deep South, Arkansas, and the New England states of Massachusetts and Rhode Island, reflecting the deep divisions exacerbated by religious and cultural issues.
Popular Vote
Hoover garnered 21,427,123 popular votes (58.11%), while Smith received 15,015,464 votes (40.90%). This represented a significant increase in turnout compared to previous elections, partly attributed to the growing participation of women voters.
Electoral Map
The electoral map vividly illustrates Hoover's sweeping victory. Red states indicate Hoover's wins, while blue states show Smith's victories. The map highlights the significant Republican gains in the traditionally Democratic South, a key indicator of the election's realignment effects.

Geographic Trends
Shifting Alliances
Hoover's victory marked a significant Republican breakthrough in the South. He carried states like Virginia, North Carolina, Florida, and Texas, which had been reliably Democratic for decades. This shift was driven by a combination of factors, including anti-Catholic sentiment, economic appeals, and the weakening of traditional Democratic loyalties.
Urban vs. Rural
Smith performed better in urban centers, particularly among immigrant populations, improving upon previous Democratic results in many major cities. However, Hoover's appeal across rural and suburban areas, coupled with his strength in the South, ultimately secured his victory. The election demonstrated a growing divide between urban and rural voting patterns.
County-Level Analysis
Detailed county-level results reveal the extent of Hoover's gains. He won numerous counties that had historically voted Democratic. Conversely, Smith's victories were concentrated in the Deep South and a few urban areas, highlighting the national scope of Hoover's triumph and the fragmentation of the Democratic coalition.
Key Candidates
Herbert Hoover (Republican)
A distinguished engineer and former Secretary of Commerce, Hoover was lauded for his humanitarian efforts and his association with the era's economic prosperity. His campaign emphasized continuity and stability, promising to uphold Republican policies.

Al Smith (Democratic)
Governor of New York, Al Smith was a charismatic figure and the first major-party Catholic nominee. His platform focused on urban issues and reform, but his candidacy was hampered by religious prejudice, his stance on Prohibition, and his ties to Tammany Hall.
.png/250px-AlfredSmith_(3x4).png)
Charles Curtis (Republican VP)
Senator from Kansas, Charles Curtis served as Hoover's running mate. His nomination was significant as he was the first candidate of Native American ancestry to be nominated for Vice President by a major party, aiming to broaden the Republican appeal.

Joseph T. Robinson (Democratic VP)
Senator from Arkansas, Joseph T. Robinson was Al Smith's running mate. His selection was intended to balance Smith's urban, Catholic background with a more traditional Southern Protestant appeal, though it ultimately did not overcome the challenges faced by the Democratic ticket.

Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "1928 United States Presidential Election" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
- Douglas C. Strange, "Lutherans and Presidential Politics: The National Lutheran Editors' and Managers' Association Statement of 1928," Concordia Historical Institute Quarterly, Winter 1968, Vol. 41 Issue 4, pp 168-172
- Allan J. Lichtman, Prejudice and the Old Politics: The Presidential Election of 1928 (1979)
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.
This is not professional political or historical advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional consultation or in-depth academic research. Always refer to primary sources and consult with qualified historians or political scientists for specific needs.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.