This is an academic overview derived from the Wikipedia article on the 1936 college football season. Explore the full source here. (opens in new tab)

Gridiron Genesis

An academic exploration of the pivotal 1936 season, charting the rise of the AP Poll and the landscape of collegiate athletics.

Season Overview ๐Ÿ‘‡ View Standings ๐Ÿ“Š

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
๐ŸŽฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ŸŽฎ

The Inaugural AP Poll

A New Era in Rankings

The 1936 college football season marked a significant milestone: the introduction of the Associated Press (AP) writers' poll to determine a national champion. This system, based on the aggregated opinions of 35 sportswriters, provided a standardized method for ranking teams, moving beyond earlier mathematical systems and subjective assessments. The first poll, released on October 20, 1936, immediately established Minnesota as the dominant force, reflecting their strong performance.

Early Season Dynamics

The season commenced with several notable upsets and close contests. Defending champions like SMU and Stanford experienced early setbacks, while traditional powers such as Minnesota and Pittsburgh demonstrated consistent strength. The early weeks set the stage for intense competition, with teams vying for recognition in the nascent AP ranking system.

The Heisman Trophy

This season also celebrated individual excellence. The prestigious Heisman Trophy, awarded to the most outstanding player, was presented to Larry Kelley, an end from Yale University. Kelley's recognition underscored the growing importance of individual performance within the collegiate football landscape.

The First AP Poll Revealed

Minnesota Leads the Pack

The inaugural AP poll, released on October 20, 1936, placed Minnesota at the forefront, garnering 32 out of 35 first-place votes and a total of 345 points. This early consensus reflected Minnesota's undefeated status and dominant performances. The poll also highlighted the competitive landscape, with Duke, Army, Northwestern, and Purdue rounding out the top five, indicating a strong field of contenders.

Diverse Ranking Methodologies

While the AP poll relied on journalistic consensus, it's important to note that contemporary "math system" selectors offered alternative rankings. Two such systems favored Pittsburgh as the top team, illustrating the varied approaches to evaluating team performance during this era. This diversity in assessment methods provided a richer, albeit sometimes conflicting, view of team hierarchies.

Expanding Post-Season Play

The Cotton Bowl's Debut

The 1936 season witnessed the expansion of major bowl games with the inaugural hosting of the Cotton Bowl Classic in Dallas. This addition provided another prestigious platform for collegiate teams to showcase their talents on New Year's Day, further solidifying the importance of the post-season in college football tradition.

Conference Realignment

Evolving Structures

The collegiate athletic landscape was dynamic in 1936, with conferences undergoing changes. The Alamo Conference commenced operations, while the Chesapeake Conference concluded its activities. Furthermore, several institutions shifted their conference affiliations, reflecting the ongoing evolution of collegiate athletic governance and competition.

Key membership changes included:

  • The Citadel Bulldogs moved from the SIAA to the Southern Conference.
  • Davidson Wildcats transitioned from Independent status to the Southern Conference.
  • Furman Paladins joined the Southern Conference from the SIAA.
  • George Washington Colonials moved from Independent status to the Southern Conference.
  • Richmond Spiders moved from the Virginia Conference to the Southern Conference.
  • Wake Forest Demon Deacons joined the Southern Conference as an Independent.
  • William & Mary Indians moved from the Virginia Conference to the Southern Conference.
  • Virginia Cavaliers moved from the Southern Conference to Independent status.
  • St. Francis (NY) Terriers dropped their football program.

Key Matchups and Outcomes

September Surprises

The season began with notable results. Minnesota opened strongly with a victory over Washington, while Stanford, the previous Rose Bowl winner, suffered an early loss to Santa Clara. TCU, the Sugar Bowl champion, also faced an early defeat against Texas Tech, indicating that the established order was not guaranteed.

October's Shifting Tides

October saw significant shifts in the national rankings. A pivotal game occurred on October 31st, where Northwestern defeated previously undefeated Minnesota 6-0, propelling Northwestern to the top of the AP Poll. This upset demonstrated the volatility of the new ranking system and the competitive parity among top teams.

November's Championship Contenders

November featured critical conference showdowns. Northwestern clinched the Big Ten title but subsequently lost to Notre Dame, causing them to fall in the rankings. Minnesota regained the top spot after Northwestern's loss. LSU secured the SEC title, and Alabama remained a strong contender, highlighting the intense competition for the national championship as the season concluded.

Conference Standings Overview

A detailed examination of conference performance reveals the competitive dynamics across the nation. Below are select conference standings from the 1936 season.

Big Ten Conference

Northwestern emerged as the conference champion, finishing undefeated in conference play. Minnesota also had a strong showing, securing the second position.

1936 Big Ten Conference football standings
Team Conf. Overall
Team W L T W L T
No. 7 Northwestern $ 6โ€“0โ€“0 7โ€“1โ€“0
No. 1 Minnesota 4โ€“1โ€“0 7โ€“1โ€“0
Ohio State 4โ€“1โ€“0 5โ€“3โ€“0
Indiana 3โ€“1โ€“1 5โ€“2โ€“1
Purdue 3โ€“1โ€“1 5โ€“2โ€“1
Illinois 2โ€“2โ€“1 4โ€“3โ€“1
Chicago 1โ€“4โ€“0 2โ€“5โ€“1
Iowa 0โ€“4โ€“1 3โ€“4โ€“1
Wisconsin 0โ€“4โ€“0 2โ€“6โ€“0
Michigan 0โ€“5โ€“0 1โ€“7โ€“0

Southeastern Conference

LSU and Alabama demonstrated exceptional performance, finishing as co-champions of the SEC. Both teams were highly ranked nationally.

1936 Southeastern Conference football standings
Team Conf. Overall
Team W L T W L T
No. 2 LSU $ 6โ€“0โ€“0 9โ€“1โ€“1
No. 4 Alabama 5โ€“0โ€“1 8โ€“0โ€“1
Auburn 4โ€“1โ€“1 7โ€“2โ€“2
No. 17 Tennessee 3โ€“1โ€“2 6โ€“2โ€“2
Mississippi State 3โ€“2โ€“0 7โ€“3โ€“1
Georgia 3โ€“3โ€“0 5โ€“4โ€“1
Georgia Tech 3โ€“3โ€“1 5โ€“5โ€“1
Tulane 2โ€“3โ€“1 6โ€“3โ€“1
Vanderbilt 1โ€“3โ€“1 3โ€“5โ€“1
Kentucky 1โ€“3โ€“0 6โ€“4โ€“0
Florida 1โ€“5โ€“0 4โ€“6โ€“0
Ole Miss 0โ€“3โ€“1 5โ€“5โ€“2
Sewanee 0โ€“5โ€“0 0โ€“6โ€“1

Rocky Mountain Conference

Utah State dominated the Rocky Mountain Conference, finishing undefeated in conference play and achieving a strong overall record.

1936 Rocky Mountain Conference football standings
Team Conf. Overall
Team W L T W L T
Utah State $ 6โ€“0โ€“1 7โ€“0โ€“1
Denver 6โ€“1โ€“1 7โ€“1โ€“1
Utah 5โ€“2โ€“0 6โ€“3โ€“0
Colorado 4โ€“2โ€“0 4โ€“3โ€“0
Colorado Stateโ€“Greeley 4โ€“3โ€“0 5โ€“4โ€“0
BYU 4โ€“4โ€“0 4โ€“5โ€“0
Colorado A&M 3โ€“4โ€“1 4โ€“4โ€“1
Colorado College 3โ€“4โ€“0 3โ€“4โ€“1
Wyoming 2โ€“4โ€“1 2โ€“5โ€“1
Montana State 1โ€“4โ€“0 3โ€“5โ€“0
Western State (CO) 1โ€“5โ€“0 1โ€“6โ€“0
Colorado Mines 0โ€“6โ€“0 2โ€“6โ€“0

Individual Accolades

Larry Kelley's Heisman Triumph

The 1936 season was also distinguished by the awarding of the Heisman Trophy. Larry Kelley, an end representing Yale University, was recognized as the most outstanding player of the year. His achievement highlights the individual brilliance that characterized this era of college football.

National Championship Recognition

Shared Titles and AP Consensus

The 1936 season saw multiple teams recognized as national champions by various selectors. Minnesota, Pittsburgh, LSU, and Duke were all acknowledged as co-champions by different contemporary systems. The AP poll, however, solidified Minnesota's position as the leading team throughout much of the season, setting a precedent for future national championship determinations.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "1936 College Football Season" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about 1936_college_football_season while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

References

References

  1.  "Gophers Given Big Edge Over Other Grid Squads", The Sheboygan (Wis.) Press, Oct. 20, 1936, p10
  2.  "Wildcats Smash Gophers' Long Gridiron Dynasty, 6รขย€ย“0", Wisconsin State Journal, Oct. 31, 1936, p9
  3.  Grantland Rice, from North American News syndicate, quoted in "Panthers Turn Rose Bowl into 21 to 0 Rout", Lincoln (Neb.) State Journal, Jan. 2, 1937, p7
  4.  "Santa Clara Scores Twice First Period To Trip L.S.U. 21-14", Lincoln (Neb.) State Journal, Jan. 2, 1937, p7
  5.  "Slingin' Sam Rifles Texas Christian to 16-6 Bowl Conquest", Lincoln (Neb.) State Journal, Jan. 2, 1937, p7
A full list of references for this article are available at the 1936 college football season Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Academic Disclaimer

Important Considerations

This content has been generated by an AI model for educational purposes, drawing upon historical data from Wikipedia. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy and adherence to the source material, the information represents a specific point in time and may not encompass all nuances or subsequent interpretations of the 1936 college football season.

This is not professional sports analysis or historical consulting. The information provided is intended for academic enrichment and should not be considered a substitute for rigorous historical research or expert consultation. Always consult primary sources and scholarly works for definitive historical accounts.

The creators of this page are not liable for any inaccuracies, omissions, or interpretations derived from this content.