This is a visual explainer based on the Wikipedia article on the 1992 Davidson state by-election. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

The Davidson By-Election

Examining the 1992 New South Wales Electoral Contest and its Immediate Political Fallout.

Background ๐Ÿ‘‡ Results ๐Ÿ“Š

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
๐ŸŽฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ŸŽฎ

The Genesis of the Contest

A Traditionally Safe Seat

The electoral district of Davidson, situated in New South Wales, Australia, had historically been a reliably safe seat for the Liberal Party. It had been represented since 1981 by Dr. Terry Metherell, a figure who would become central to a significant political controversy.

The Metherell Crisis

Dr. Metherell served as a Minister for Education within the first term of the Greiner government. However, his political career was significantly impacted by charges of tax avoidance, which led to his resignation from the Ministry in 1990. Following the Liberal Party's re-election in 1991, there was speculation about his potential return to cabinet. This prospect was diminished when the Greiner government lost its parliamentary majority, becoming reliant on the support of four independent members to remain in power.

Resignation and Reshuffle

Feeling politically marginalized and betrayed by his party, Metherell made a dramatic exit. In October 1991, he resigned from the Liberal Party live on the national television program '7:30 Report', without prior notification to his parliamentary colleagues. Subsequently, the government facilitated his appointment to a position within the Environment Protection Agency. Metherell accepted this role, which necessitated his resignation from state parliament, thereby creating a vacancy in the Davidson seat. This move was widely perceived as a strategic maneuver to engineer a by-election in a seat highly likely to revert to Liberal control.

The By-Election Landscape

The circumstances surrounding Metherell's departure and subsequent appointment set the stage for the by-election. Notably, the Australian Labor Party chose not to nominate a candidate. Instead, a field comprising several Independent candidates and minor parties contested the seat. This fragmentation of the opposition vote, coupled with the Liberal Party's established base, would ultimately shape the electoral outcome, though not without a notable shift in voter sentiment.

The Electoral Outcome

Liberal Hold, But With A Warning

Despite the controversial circumstances and the absence of a Labor candidate, the Liberal Party successfully retained the seat of Davidson. Andrew Humpherson, a Warringah Councillor since 1985, emerged victorious. However, this victory was tempered by a significant decline in the party's electoral performance.

A Swing Against The Incumbent

The primary vote for the Liberal Party experienced a substantial drop of 16%. This trend was further reflected in the two-party preferred vote, which saw a decline of 14%. The main challenger was Independent candidate Julie Sutton, also a Warringah Councillor since 1980, who secured a considerable portion of the vote.

Broader Political Ramifications

The implications of the Metherell appointment extended beyond the Davidson by-election. The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) ultimately determined that Metherell's appointment to the EPA had been corrupt. This finding, combined with the threat from the independent MPs to withdraw their support, created immense pressure on the Greiner government. Consequently, Premier Nick Greiner was compelled to resign from politics just a few months after the by-election, underscoring the profound impact of the events surrounding the Davidson contest.

Detailed Election Data

1992 Davidson State By-Election Results

The following table presents the detailed results of the 1992 Davidson state by-election held on Saturday, 2 May 1992.

1992 Davidson by-election
Saturday 2 May 1992
Party Candidate Votes % ยฑ%
Liberal Andrew Humpherson 15,852 49.32 โˆ’16.07
Independent Julie Sutton 9,489 29.52 +29.52
Greens Ross Knowles 1,195 3.72 +3.72
Democrats Edna Cunningham 1,156 3.60 โˆ’12.01
Independent Kevin Begaud 918 2.86 +2.86
Independent Michael Evanian 852 2.65 +2.65
Call to Australia Bruce Coleman 770 2.40 +2.40
Independent EFF Michael Vescio 683 2.12 +2.12
Independent Ted Roach 361 1.12 +1.12
Independent Janet Fairlie-Cuninghame 357 1.11 +1.11
Independent Peter Leney 190 0.59 +0.59
Independent Steven Klinger 157 0.49 +0.49
Independent William Williams 105 0.33 +0.33
Independent Julien Droulers 34 0.11 +0.11
Independent Sandor Torzsok 24 0.07 +0.07
Total formal votes 32,143 96.97
Informal votes 1,006 3.03
Turnout 33,149 87.10
Two-candidate-preferred result
Liberal Andrew Humpherson 17,352 59.65 โˆ’13.04
Independent Julie Sutton 11,737 40.35 +40.35
Liberal hold Swing โˆ’13.04

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "1992 Davidson State By-election" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about 1992_davidson_state_by-election while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

References

References

A full list of references for this article are available at the 1992 Davidson state by-election Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page has been generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes exclusively. The content is derived from a snapshot of publicly available data and may not represent the most current or complete information available. It is presented to facilitate academic study and understanding of historical political events.

This is not professional political analysis. The information provided herein is not a substitute for rigorous academic research, expert political commentary, or legal consultation. Readers are encouraged to consult primary sources and scholarly works for comprehensive and up-to-date insights into political events and their ramifications. The creators of this page assume no liability for any inaccuracies, omissions, or actions taken based on the information presented.