What was the primary purpose of the 1992 South African apartheid referendum?

The 1992 South African apartheid referendum was held to ask white South African voters if they supported the continuation of the reform process initiated by State President F. W. de Klerk on February 2, 1990, which aimed at establishing a new Constitution through negotiation. This referendum was a critical step in the dismantling of the apartheid system, a policy of institutionalized racial segregation and discrimination enforced in South Africa from 1948 to the early 1990s.

When did the 1992 South African apartheid referendum take place, and who was eligible to vote?

The referendum was held on March 17, 1992, and voting was exclusively limited to white South African voters. This was the final instance where only the white electorate participated in a national vote before the introduction of universal suffrage.

What was the outcome of the 1992 apartheid referendum?

The referendum resulted in a significant victory for the 'Yes' side, with 68.73% of the votes supporting the continuation of reforms. This outcome ultimately led to the lifting of apartheid.

What significant announcements did State President F. W. de Klerk make on February 2, 1990, that set the stage for the referendum?

On February 2, 1990, State President F. W. de Klerk announced the lifting of bans on political parties like the African National Congress (ANC) and the South African Communist Party. He also declared that Nelson Mandela would be released from prison after 27 years, capital punishment would be suspended, and the state of emergency would be lifted, signaling a readiness to negotiate.

When was Nelson Mandela released from prison, and where was he held?

Nelson Mandela was released on February 11, 1990, from Victor Verster Prison in Paarl, near Cape Town. His release was a pivotal moment in South Africa's transition from apartheid to democracy.

What political challenges did the National Party face leading up to the 1992 referendum?

Before the referendum, the governing National Party had lost three by-elections after announcing negotiations to end apartheid. Its position was strongly opposed by the Conservative Party, which was against the negotiations and boycotted the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA).

What event specifically challenged the National Party's credibility and prompted President de Klerk to call for the referendum?

The National Party's defeat in the Potchefstroom by-election on February 19, 1992, which de Klerk had declared a 'test vote,' significantly undermined its credibility. This loss directly led to de Klerk's announcement on February 20 that a national referendum for the white electorate would be held to gauge support for his government's reforms.

What was the political climate in South Africa like in the period immediately preceding the referendum?

The period before the referendum was marked by slow progress in negotiations between the government and the African National Congress, increasing violence in South African townships, growing prominence of right-wing groups, and rising dissatisfaction within both the white and black communities. This created significant domestic and international pressure on the government to advance negotiations.

What was State President F. W. de Klerk's personal commitment regarding the outcome of the referendum?

De Klerk publicly stated that if the referendum's outcome had been negative, he would have resigned and called for general elections. This demonstrated the high stakes he placed on the referendum's result.

What criticism did the referendum face regarding voter eligibility?

Many critics expressed concern that only white citizens were granted the right to vote in the referendum. This exclusion highlighted the lingering racial inequalities even as reforms were being discussed.

How was South Africa geographically organized for the purpose of the 1992 referendum?

For the referendum, South Africa was divided into fifteen distinct areas, each comprising groups of House of Assembly electoral divisions. This administrative division allowed for regional analysis of the voting patterns.

Which political parties campaigned for a 'Yes' vote in the referendum?

The National Party, led by F. W. de Klerk, and the Democratic Party both campaigned for a 'Yes' vote. These parties supported the reform process and the move towards a new constitution.

Which political parties campaigned for a 'No' vote in the referendum?

The conservative right wing, primarily led by the Conservative Party and the Herstigte Nasionale Party, campaigned for a 'No' vote. These groups opposed the negotiations and sought to maintain apartheid.

What was the core message of the 'Yes' campaign, and what warnings did it issue to white voters?

The 'Yes' campaign focused on 'power sharing' and assured white South Africans that the government was not simply ceding power to the ANC. It warned that a 'No' vote would lead to continued international sanctions, the risk of civil war, and escalating chaos within South Africa.

What specific constitutional promises did de Klerk's government make as part of the 'Yes' campaign?

The government promised a new constitutional settlement that would include a bill of rights, separation of powers between government branches, an independent judiciary, and a bicameral Parliament. These were intended to reassure voters about the future democratic structure.

How did the National Party's 'Yes' campaign utilize media and advertising?

The National Party's 'Yes' campaign was unprecedented in South Africa, featuring large political gatherings, advertisements in national newspapers, and commercial television time. They produced prominent 'Yes! Ja! SA' posters and a controversial poster depicting an AWB member with a gun, urging voters to 'You can stop this man! Vote YES'.

What was the central argument of the 'No' campaign, and what alternative did they propose?

The 'No' campaign, led by Andries Treurnicht, warned against 'black majority rule' and 'ANC communist rule.' They advocated for white self-determination and, during the campaign, began to propose an independent homeland, or Volkstaat, for the white minority.

What advantages did the 'Yes' campaign have over the 'No' campaign?

The 'Yes' campaign benefited significantly from the backing of the government, the opposition Democratic Party, the media (including government-controlled television and radio), the international community, and the vast majority of commercial and business organizations. This provided them with superior funding and access to mass media, unlike the 'No' campaign.

What were the total numbers of 'For' and 'Against' votes in the referendum?

There were 1,924,186 votes 'For' and 875,610 votes 'Against' the reform process. These numbers reflect the choices made by the white electorate.

What was the total voter turnout for the 1992 referendum?

Out of 3,296,800 registered voters, 2,804,938 votes were cast, resulting in a turnout of 85.08%. This indicates a high level of participation among the eligible white electorate.

Which regions showed the strongest support for the 'Yes' vote?

Cape Town and Durban demonstrated overwhelming support for the 'Yes' vote, with 84.88% and 85.03% respectively. Even Pretoria, a traditionally more conservative area, saw over 57% vote 'Yes'.

Which region was the only one to vote 'No' in the referendum, and what was its percentage?

Pietersburg in the Northern Transvaal, a rural right-wing stronghold, was the only area to vote 'No,' with 56.98% against the reforms. This highlights the regional differences in political sentiment.

How did the results in Kroonstad, a conservative stronghold, reflect the overall trend?

Despite being a conservative stronghold where 'No' campaigners held five out of seven parliamentary seats, Kroonstad voted 'Yes' with 51.54% of the votes. This indicated a broader shift in opinion even in traditionally conservative areas.

What was President de Klerk's reaction to the referendum results?

The day after the referendum, President de Klerk declared, 'Today we have closed the book on apartheid,' celebrating the outcome on his 56th birthday. This statement marked a symbolic end to the apartheid era.

What was Nelson Mandela's reaction to the referendum results?

Nelson Mandela expressed his satisfaction, stating that he was 'very happy indeed' with the outcome of the referendum. His approval underscored the significance of the 'Yes' vote for the broader anti-apartheid movement.

How did the alliance between the Conservative Party and the Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging potentially affect the 'No' vote?

The alliance between the Conservative Party and the Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging (AWB), a far-right paramilitary organization, may have harmed the 'No' campaign. It is suggested that this alliance might have even deterred some voters, pushing them towards the 'Yes' side due to the AWB's militant image.

What was the voter turnout like in some areas, despite some conservative groups boycotting the referendum?

Despite some conservative and militant defenders of apartheid boycotting the referendum, turnout was exceptionally high, reaching over 96% in certain areas. This high participation rate demonstrated the importance white South Africans placed on the vote.

What mandate did de Klerk and his government claim after the 'Yes' vote?

Following the 'Yes' vote, de Klerk and his government asserted that white South Africans were in favor of universal suffrage and that they had a clear mandate to negotiate with the African National Congress. This strengthened their position in the ongoing constitutional talks.

What was the African National Congress's initial stance on the referendum, and why did they ultimately advocate for a 'Yes' vote?

The ANC initially disapproved of the referendum because only whites were allowed to vote. However, recognizing that a 'No' vote would jeopardize negotiations and increase political instability, and having no reason to encourage white opposition to the reforms, the ANC ultimately advocated for a 'Yes' vote.

What accusations did right-wing groups make regarding the referendum results?

Right-wing groups criticized the referendum, accusing the government of electoral fraud. Andries Treurnicht, a 'No' campaigner, claimed that media propaganda, foreign intervention, threats by businesspeople against employees, and electoral fraud contributed to the 'Yes' vote.

Was there any evidence to support the right-wing claims of electoral fraud?

According to the source material, no evidence has ever been presented to substantiate the claims of electoral irregularities made by right-wing groups. This suggests that the results were generally accepted as legitimate.

How did the referendum outcome compare to the 1989 House of Assembly election results?

In terms of percentage, the referendum outcome closely mirrored the results of the 1989 House of Assembly election. The 'Yes' side's regional shares were very similar to the combined shares of the National Party (NP) and Democratic Party (DP), while the 'No' side's shares were comparable to those of the Conservative Party (CP) and Herstigte Nasionale Party (HNP) two and a half years prior.

What was the ultimate political consequence of the 1992 apartheid referendum?

The referendum's 'Yes' vote paved the way for South Africa's first non-racial elections on April 27, 1994. These elections resulted in a landslide victory for the African National Congress and saw Nelson Mandela become the first black President of South Africa, marking the official end of apartheid.

How many electoral divisions were grouped under the 'Cape Town' area for the referendum?

The Cape Town area for the referendum consisted of 27 electoral divisions. These divisions included Bellville, Caledon, Cape Town Gardens, Claremont, Constantia, De Kuilen, Durbanville, False Bay, Green Point, Groote Schuur, Helderberg, Maitland, Malmesbury, Namaqualand, Paarl, Parow, Piketberg, Pinelands, Sea Point, Simon's Town, Stellenbosch, Tygervallei, Vasco, Walvis Bay, Wellington, Worcester, and Wynberg.

How many electoral divisions comprised the 'Johannesburg' area in Transvaal Province?

The Johannesburg area was made up of 21 electoral divisions. These included Alberton, Bezuidenhout, Bryanston, Hillbrow, Houghton, Jeppe, Johannesburg North, Johannesburg West, Langlaagte, Meyerton, North Rand, Overvaal, Parktown, Randburg, Rosettenville, Sandton, Turffontein, Vanderbijlpark, Vereeniging, Westdene, and Yeoville.

What percentage of valid votes were 'For' the reforms in the George area of Cape Province?

In the George area of Cape Province, 65.39% of the valid votes were 'For' the reforms. This indicates a clear majority in favor of continuing the reform process in that region.

What was the percentage of 'No' votes in the Pretoria area?

In the Pretoria area, 42.63% of the votes were 'No'. While a significant portion, it was still a minority compared to the 'Yes' vote in that region.

What was the total number of registered voters for the 1992 referendum?

The total number of registered voters for the 1992 South African apartheid referendum was 3,296,800. This figure represents the white electorate eligible to participate in this historic vote.

What was the percentage of invalid or blank votes in the referendum?

The percentage of invalid or blank votes in the referendum was 0.18%. This indicates a very low rate of spoiled ballots, suggesting clear participation from voters.

Which province had the most electoral divisions grouped into referendum areas?

The Transvaal Province had the most electoral divisions grouped into referendum areas, with a total of 76 divisions across its five areas (Germiston, Johannesburg, Pietersburg, Pretoria, and Roodepoort). This reflects the province's large population and political significance.

What was the vote count for 'Yes' in the Johannesburg area?

The Johannesburg area recorded 324,686 'Yes' votes, representing 78.30% of the total valid votes in that area. This shows strong support for the reforms in one of South Africa's major cities.

How did the 'Yes' vote in Pietermaritzburg compare to the 'No' vote?

In Pietermaritzburg, 66,500 votes were 'Yes' (75.98%), while 21,023 votes were 'No' (24.02%). This indicates a substantial majority in favor of the reforms in that region.

What was the significance of the 1992 referendum in the context of South African electoral history?

The 1992 referendum was historically significant as it was the last occasion in which only the white electorate participated in a national vote. It directly preceded the introduction of universal suffrage and the country's first non-racial elections in 1994, marking a definitive end to the apartheid system.

What was the role of the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA) in the lead-up to the referendum?

The Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA) was a multi-party negotiating forum aimed at creating a new democratic constitution for South Africa. The Conservative Party boycotted CODESA, indicating their opposition to the negotiation process that the referendum sought to affirm.

What was the message on the Democratic Party's posters during the campaign?

The Democratic Party's posters during the campaign carried the message 'Ja vir vrede' (Yes for peace). This slogan emphasized the desire for a peaceful resolution to the country's political turmoil.

What was the total number of valid votes cast in the referendum?

The total number of valid votes cast in the referendum was 2,799,796. This figure excludes any invalid or blank ballots.

What was the percentage of 'Yes' votes in the East London area?

In the East London area, 78.28% of the votes were 'Yes'. This indicates strong regional support for the reform process.

1992 South African Apartheid Referendum Wiki: The Mandate for Change: South Africa's 1992 Referendum on Apartheid

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

What Was It?

A Pivotal White-Only Vote

The 1992 South African apartheid referendum, held on March 17, 1992, was a critical national vote exclusively for white South African voters. Its purpose was to ascertain their support for the ongoing reform process initiated by State President F. W. de Klerk, which aimed at dismantling the apartheid system established in 1948 and negotiating a new constitution. The resounding "Yes" vote ultimately sanctioned the abolition of apartheid, marking this as the final electoral event limited solely to the white electorate before the introduction of universal suffrage in 1994.

De Klerk's Reforms Begin

The referendum was a direct consequence of the significant reforms announced by State President F. W. de Klerk on February 2, 1990. In his address to parliament, de Klerk declared the unbanning of major political parties, including the African National Congress (ANC) and the South African Communist Party, and the imminent release of Nelson Mandela after 27 years of imprisonment. Further reforms included the suspension of capital punishment, the lifting of the state of emergency, and the abolition of acts restricting land ownership, separate living areas, and racial classification in 1991. These actions signaled a clear intent to negotiate a new constitutional order.

Historical Context

The Road to Negotiation

Following de Klerk's initial announcements, Nelson Mandela was released on February 11, 1990. South West Africa gained independence as Namibia on March 21, 1990, and by June, the state of emergency was lifted, with the ANC agreeing to a ceasefire. These developments set the stage for formal negotiations between the government and the ANC. However, progress was slow, leading to increasing political and social tensions across the nation.

Mounting Pressure for Change

Before the referendum, the ruling National Party faced significant challenges. It had lost three by-elections, particularly the Potchefstroom by-election on February 19, 1992, which de Klerk had declared a "test vote" for his reform agenda. This raised doubts about the government's mandate to negotiate. The Conservative Party, staunchly against the negotiations, boycotted the Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA). Amid escalating violence in townships, rising prominence of right-wing groups, and growing dissatisfaction within both white and black communities, the government faced immense domestic and international pressure to advance the negotiations. De Klerk announced the referendum on February 20, stating he would resign if the "No" vote prevailed, thereby staking his political future on the outcome.

The Campaign

The "Yes" Mandate

The "Yes" campaign was spearheaded by the National Party and the Democratic Party. It benefited from extensive support from the government, the media, the international community, and a vast majority of commercial and business organizations. De Klerk framed the "Yes" vote as a mandate for "power sharing" rather than a surrender of power to the ANC. He warned that a "No" vote would lead to continued international sanctions, civil unrest, and worsening chaos. De Klerk also committed to a new constitution featuring a bill of rights, separation of powers, an independent judiciary, and a bicameral parliament, asserting that a second referendum would only be necessary if the final terms "substantially" differed from these promises. The campaign was unprecedented in South African history, featuring large political rallies, widespread newspaper advertisements, television commercials, and prominent "Yes! Ja! SA" posters. A particularly impactful poster depicted an AWB member with a gun, urging voters to "Stop this man! Vote YES."

The "No" Opposition

The "No" campaign was led by the Conservative Party and the Herstigte Nasionale Party, with Andries Treurnicht as a key figure. Their message warned against "black majority rule" and "ANC communist rule," advocating for white self-determination and the establishment of an independent homeland, or Volkstaat, for the white minority. However, the "No" campaign faced significant disadvantages, lacking comparable funding and media access, relying primarily on posters to convey its message. This disparity in resources and public platform made it challenging for them to counter the well-resourced "Yes" campaign.

Referendum Areas

Electoral Divisions

For the purpose of the referendum, South Africa was meticulously divided into fifteen distinct areas. Each area comprised a specific grouping of electoral divisions from the House of Assembly, ensuring a structured approach to collecting votes across the white electorate.

The following table details the provinces, referendum areas, and the number of electoral divisions within each:

Province	Area	Electoral Divisions
Cape Province	Beaufort West	4
	Cape Town	27
	East London	7
	George	4
	Kimberley	6
	Port Elizabeth	8
Natal	Durban	14
Natal	Pietermaritzburg	6
Orange Free State	Bloemfontein	7
Orange Free State	Kroonstad	7
Transvaal	Germiston	13
	Johannesburg	21
	Pietersburg	5
	Pretoria	23
	Roodepoort	14

The Results

The Referendum Question

Voters were asked to respond to the following question:

"Do you support continuation of the reform process which the State President began on 2 February 1990 and which is aimed at a new Constitution through negotiation?"

The outcome was a decisive victory for the "Yes" side, indicating strong support among the white electorate for the continuation of reforms.

Overall and Regional Breakdown

The national results demonstrated a clear mandate for change, with a significant majority voting in favor of continuing the reform process. Turnout was remarkably high, reflecting the gravity of the decision for the white community.

Overall Results

Choice	Votes	%
Yes	1,924,186	68.73%
No	875,619	31.27%

Valid votes	2,799,805	99.82%
Invalid or blank votes	5,142	0.18%
Total votes	2,804,947	100.00%
Registered voters/turnout	3,296,800	85.08%

Results by Region

Province	Area	For		Against		Total valid votes
Province	Area	Votes	%	Votes	%	Total valid votes
Cape Province	Beaufort West	18,941	61.62	11,798	38.38	30,739
	Cape Town	355,527	84.88	63,325	15.12	418,852
	East London	66,675	78.28	18,498	21.72	85,173
	George	40,075	65.39	21,211	34.61	61,286
	Kimberley	33,504	54.48	27,993	45.52	61,497
	Port Elizabeth	87,216	74.46	29,909	25.54	117,125
Natal	Durban	204,371	85.03	35,975	14.97	240,346
Natal	Pietermaritzburg	66,500	75.98	21,023	24.02	87,523
Orange Free State	Bloemfontein	58,066	58.60	41,017	41.40	99,083
Orange Free State	Kroonstad	54,531	51.54	51,279	48.46	105,810
Transvaal	Germiston	164,025	65.38	86,844	34.62	250,869
	Johannesburg	324,686	78.30	89,957	21.70	414,643
	Pietersburg	37,612	43.02	49,820	56.98	87,432
	Pretoria	287,720	57.37	213,825	42.63	501,545
	Roodepoort	124,737	52.44	113,145	47.56	237,882

Notably, only Pietersburg in the Northern Transvaal, a rural right-wing stronghold, voted "No" with 57%. Even in traditionally conservative areas like Kroonstad, the "Yes" side secured a victory with 52% of the vote.

The Aftermath

A New Chapter

The day after the referendum, President de Klerk declared, "Today we have closed the book on apartheid," coinciding with his 56th birthday. Nelson Mandela expressed his profound satisfaction, stating he was "very happy indeed." The Cape Times newspaper prominently announced the outcome with the headline "IT'S YES." This decisive vote provided de Klerk and his government with a clear mandate to proceed with negotiations for a new, non-racial constitution.

Disputed Claims and Legitimacy

Despite the clear outcome, right-wing groups criticized the referendum, alleging electoral fraud. They expressed disbelief at their losses in areas where they had historically been strongest, including the Afrikaner heartland and major cities. Conservative Party leader Andries Treurnicht attributed the "Yes" victory to media propaganda, foreign intervention, threats from business leaders against employees, and electoral irregularities. However, no credible evidence of electoral fraud was ever presented. The high voter turnout, exceeding 96% in some areas, underscored the legitimacy of the process.

Towards Universal Suffrage

The African National Congress, while initially disapproving of the white-only nature of the referendum, ultimately advocated for a "Yes" vote. This strategic decision was driven by the understanding that a "No" outcome would not only jeopardize the ongoing negotiations but also exacerbate political instability and chaos across the country. The referendum's results closely mirrored the regional voting patterns of the 1989 House of Assembly election, indicating a consistent shift in white political sentiment. This pivotal moment directly paved the way for South Africa's first non-racial elections on April 27, 1994, which saw a landslide victory for the African National Congress and the historic inauguration of Nelson Mandela as the nation's first black President.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "1992 South African Apartheid Referendum" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about 1992_south_african_apartheid_referendum while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

alphitonia zizyphoides

References

Algoa, Humansdorp, Newton Park, Port Elizabeth Central, Port Elizabeth North, Sundays River, Uitenhage and Walmer

Amanzimtoti, Berea, Durban Central, Durban North, Durban Point, Greytown, Pinetown, Port Natal, South Coast, Umbilo, Umfolozi, Umhlanga, Umhlatuzana and Umlazi

Bloemfontein East, Bloemfontein North, Bloemfontein West, Fauresmith, Ladybrand, Smithfield and Winburg

Benoni, Boksburg, Brakpan, Brentwood, Edenvale, Geduld, Germiston, Germiston District, Kempton Park, Modderfontein, Nigel, Primrose and Springs

Carletonville, Florida, Helderkruin, Klerksdorp, Krugersdorp, Lichtenburg, Losberg, Maraisburg, Potchefstroom, Randfontein, Roodepoort, Schweizer-Reneke, Stilfontein and Ventersdorp

Toward Democracy Library of Congress Country Studies

A full list of references for this article are available at the 1992 South African apartheid referendum Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date. Historical and political events are complex and subject to ongoing interpretation and research.

This is not political or historical advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for in-depth academic study, primary source research, or consultation with expert historians and political scientists. Always refer to reputable academic sources, historical archives, and official documents for comprehensive understanding. Never disregard established historical consensus or scholarly analysis because of something you have read on this website.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.

The Mandate for Change

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

What Was It? 📜

🗳️ A Pivotal White-Only Vote

🗓️ De Klerk's Reforms Begin

Historical Context 🌍

🤝 The Road to Negotiation

⚖️ Mounting Pressure for Change

The Campaign 📣

✅ The "Yes" Mandate

❌ The "No" Opposition

Referendum Areas 🗺️

📍 Electoral Divisions

The Results 📈

✅ The Referendum Question

📊 Overall and Regional Breakdown

Overall Results

Results by Region

The Aftermath 🕊️

🎉 A New Chapter

⚖️ Disputed Claims and Legitimacy

➡️ Towards Universal Suffrage

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

What Was It?

A Pivotal White-Only Vote

De Klerk's Reforms Begin

Historical Context

The Road to Negotiation

Mounting Pressure for Change

The Campaign

The "Yes" Mandate

The "No" Opposition

Referendum Areas

Electoral Divisions

The Results

The Referendum Question

Overall and Regional Breakdown

The Aftermath

A New Chapter

Disputed Claims and Legitimacy

Towards Universal Suffrage

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Disclaimer

Important Notice