This is a detailed exploration based on the Wikipedia article concerning the Battle of Arras (1917). Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

The Arras Offensive

A Strategic Examination of the 1917 Campaign

Battle Overview 👇 Explore Tactics ⚙️

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Battle Overview

The Engagement

The Battle of Arras, also recognized as the Second Battle of Arras, was a significant British-led offensive conducted on the Western Front during the First World War. From April 9 to May 16, 1917, British forces launched an assault against German defenses near the city of Arras in France. This offensive marked the longest advance achieved by the British since the advent of trench warfare, surpassing previous records.

Location & Dates

The battle took place near Arras, France, along a front stretching from Vimy Ridge in the north to Bullecourt in the south. The primary offensive phase occurred between 9 April and 16 May 1917, though related operations continued later into the spring.

Strategic Context

Arras was part of the larger Anglo-French Nivelle Offensive. While the French aimed for a decisive breakthrough at the Aisne, the British attack at Arras served as a crucial diversionary effort, intended to draw German reserves away from the main French thrust. The overall Allied objective was to shatter the trench stalemate and achieve a strategic victory.

Strategic Context

The Stalemate

By 1917, the Western Front was characterized by entrenched positions and a brutal war of attrition. Previous major offensives, such as the Somme and Verdun, had resulted in immense casualties with little strategic gain, placing immense pressure on Allied governments and commanders to find a decisive solution.

Political Pressures

In Britain, the resignation of Prime Minister H. H. Asquith and the rise of David Lloyd George signaled a shift towards more aggressive military strategy. In France, political instability followed disagreements over the proposed Nivelle Offensive, highlighting the high stakes involved. The entry of the United States into the war in April 1917 added a new dimension, though American forces would not significantly impact the front for over a year.

German Defensive Strategy

Facing increasing Allied material superiority, German High Command, under Hindenburg and Ludendorff, adopted a defensive posture for 1917. This included the strategic withdrawal to the heavily fortified Hindenburg Line (Siegfriedstellung) in March, a move that negated many of the Allies' pre-battle tactical assumptions.

Tactical Innovations

British Expeditionary Force (BEF)

The BEF implemented lessons learned from previous battles. Training manuals like SS 135 and SS 143 emphasized platoon-level tactics, with infantry divided into specialized sections for fire and maneuver. Key innovations included:

  • Creeping Barrage: A synchronized artillery curtain moving ahead of advancing infantry to suppress enemy positions.
  • Underground Warfare: Extensive use of tunnels and caves around Arras for troop movement, shelter, and logistics.
  • Improved Artillery: Refined counter-battery fire and specialized shells (e.g., instantaneous fuzes) to neutralize German defenses.
  • Tank Deployment: Limited but strategic use of tanks to support infantry assaults.

British preparations involved meticulous planning, including extensive underground engineering by companies like the New Zealand Tunnelling Company. The development of platoon attack formations and the integration of new equipment aimed to provide infantry with greater self-sufficiency and offensive capability.

German Army Tactics

The German army adapted its defensive doctrine, moving away from rigid defense of all ground towards a more flexible system:

  • Defense in Depth: Establishing multiple defensive zones (outpost, main resistance, battle zone, rear battle zone) to absorb and attritional attacks.
  • Area Defense: Utilizing decentralized resistance nests ('Widerstandsnester') and immediate counter-attacks ('Gegenstöße') by local reserves.
  • Reserve Deployment: Holding significant reserves ('Eingreif' divisions) further back for methodical counter-attacks after the initial Allied assault had stalled.

New German manuals emphasized fighting in depth and conserving strength, allowing attackers to advance into prepared kill zones. However, the implementation of these tactics at Arras was hampered by factors such as shortages of labor for fortifications, the long winter, and a reluctance by some commanders to fully embrace the new methods, particularly regarding the timely commitment of reserves.

Key Operations

Vimy Ridge (9–12 April)

The Canadian Corps, under General Arthur Currie, executed a meticulously planned assault on Vimy Ridge. Advancing behind a creeping barrage and utilizing machine guns effectively, they captured the strategically vital ridge, achieving a notable success for the Allies. This operation is often cited as a defining moment for Canadian military identity.

First Battle of the Scarpe (9–14 April)

The main British effort focused east of Arras, with advances made by the Third Army. Initial gains were significant, capturing key German positions like Feuchy village. However, the advance slowed, and German defenses, particularly around Neuville-Vitasse, proved resilient, preventing a decisive breakthrough.

Battles of Bullecourt (April–May)

These engagements involved Australian and British forces attacking the Hindenburg Line defenses near Bullecourt. The attacks, hampered by tank failures, difficult terrain, and strong German resistance, resulted in heavy casualties and limited territorial gains, highlighting the formidable nature of the German fortifications.

Arleux & Scarpe (Late April–Early May)

Following the initial assaults, smaller operations continued to consolidate gains and tie down German reserves. The Battle of Arleux secured the Canadian position on Vimy Ridge, while further battles for the Scarpe and surrounding areas saw continued fighting with high costs and marginal advances, ultimately failing to achieve a strategic breakthrough.

Analysis and Impact

Initial Success, Limited Breakthrough

The first two days of the Arras Offensive yielded impressive territorial gains and captured key objectives like Vimy Ridge, demonstrating improved British tactics and coordination. However, the momentum could not be sustained. The failure of the French offensive at the Aisne meant the strategic objective of a decisive breakthrough remained elusive.

Costly Stalemate

Despite the initial gains, the battle devolved into a costly stalemate. By its conclusion, both sides had suffered immense casualties, with little significant change in the strategic situation on the Western Front. The battle underscored the enduring strength of German defenses and the difficulty of achieving decisive results in the face of attrition warfare.

Lessons Learned

The offensive provided valuable lessons for the British, particularly regarding the integration of artillery, infantry, tanks, and underground operations. These experiences would inform future battles, such as the Battle of Cambrai later in 1917. For the Germans, the battle reinforced the effectiveness of their evolving defensive strategies and led to command changes and further refinement of their tactics.

Casualties

Allied Losses

The British and Dominion forces sustained approximately 158,000 casualties. This figure includes around 11,000 Canadian casualties incurred during the capture of Vimy Ridge. The Third Army bore the brunt of these losses, followed by the First and Fifth Armies.

German Losses

German casualties are estimated to be between 120,000 and 130,000. These figures are based on various historical analyses and official German records, which sometimes excluded lightly wounded personnel, making precise comparisons challenging.

Recognition

Despite the high cost, the bravery and effectiveness displayed during the battle were recognized. On the Allied side, twenty-five Victoria Crosses were awarded. German General Fritz von Lossberg, instrumental in reorganizing the defense, received the Oak Leaves to his Pour le Mérite.

Cultural Legacy

Literature

The Battle of Arras, and the broader experiences of World War I, were reflected in the works of contemporary poets and writers. Siegfried Sassoon referenced the battle in his poem "The General." Poet Edward Thomas was killed on the first day of the offensive, and C. K. Scott Moncrieff, known for translating Proust, was severely wounded during the fighting.

Music

The composer Ernest John Moeran was wounded during the Battle of Bullecourt, highlighting the personal impact of the conflict on individuals involved in the arts.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Battle Of Arras 1917" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about battle_of_arras_1917 while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

References

References

  1.  The original records are in The National Archives
  2.  Nicholls 2005, p. 36; Levine 2008, pp. 252–253.
  3.  Sheldon 2015, p. 220; Oldham 2000, pp. 66–67.
  4.  Wyrall 2003, p. 42; Oldham 2000, pp. 66–67.
  5.  Falls 1992, p. 556; Nicholls 2005, pp. 210–211.
  6.  Keegan 1999, pp. 348–352; Nicholls 2005, pp. 210–211.
A full list of references for this article are available at the Battle of Arras (1917) Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This content has been generated by an Artificial Intelligence model. It is intended for educational and informational purposes only, drawing upon publicly available data. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy and adherence to the source material, the information may not be exhaustive or entirely up-to-date.

This is not military strategy advice. The information provided is not a substitute for professional historical analysis or strategic consultation. Always consult primary sources and expert historical accounts for definitive understanding.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.