What was the Battle of Kursk and when did it take place?

The Battle of Kursk, also known as the Battle of the Kursk Salient, was a major engagement on the Eastern Front of World War II between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. It occurred near Kursk in southwestern Russia during the summer of 1943, from July 5 to August 23.

What was the overall outcome and significance of the Battle of Kursk?

The Battle of Kursk resulted in a decisive Soviet victory. It is recognized as the single largest battle in the history of warfare and is often cited, alongside the Battle of Stalingrad, as a major turning point in the European theater of World War II, marking the first time a German strategic offensive was halted before achieving a breakthrough.

What were the primary objectives of the German offensive, codenamed Operation Citadel?

Operation Citadel's main objective was to pinch off the Kursk salient by launching simultaneous attacks from the north and south. The goal was to encircle and destroy the Soviet forces defending the salient, thereby weakening Soviet offensive capabilities for the summer of 1943 and potentially improving Germany's prestige with its allies.

How did the Soviet Union gain foreknowledge of the German offensive plans?

The Soviet government received foreknowledge of the German plans through intelligence gathered by the Lucy spy ring operating in Switzerland. This information was verified by other intelligence sources, allowing the Soviets to anticipate the attack's focus on the Kursk salient.

What defensive strategy did the Soviets employ in anticipation of Operation Citadel?

Aware of the impending German attack, the Soviets constructed a sophisticated defense in depth. This involved a series of interconnected defensive belts, each fortified with minefields, anti-tank ditches, entrenchments, dug-in armored vehicles, and numerous machine-gun bunkers, designed to wear down and halt the German armored spearheads.

Why did Germany delay the launch of Operation Citadel?

Germany delayed Operation Citadel multiple times due to several factors, including the need to build up forces, await the arrival of new weapons like the Panther tank, and respond to Allied actions such as the invasion of Sicily. These delays ultimately allowed the Red Army more time to prepare its extensive defenses.

Who were the primary German commanders involved in Operation Citadel?

Key German commanders included Field Marshal Erich von Manstein, commander of Army Group South, and Field Marshal Günther von Kluge, commander of Army Group Centre. Specific army commanders included Hermann Hoth (4th Panzer Army) and Walter Model (9th Army).

Who were the main Soviet commanders responsible for the defense and counter-offensives at Kursk?

The primary Soviet commanders included Georgy Zhukov (Supreme Command), Konstantin Rokossovsky (Central Front), Nikolai Vatutin (Voronezh Front), and Ivan Konev (Steppe Front). Other significant commanders mentioned are Vasily Sokolovsky, Ivan Bagramyan, Markian Popov, Kirill Moskalenko, Pavel Batov, and Alexey Zhadov.

What was the approximate strength of the German forces committed to Operation Citadel?

The German forces for Operation Citadel comprised around 777,000 to 779,000 men, with approximately 2,451 tanks and assault guns (representing about 70% of Germany's armor on the Eastern Front), and 7,417 guns and mortars. They also deployed around 2,110 aircraft.

What was the approximate strength of the Soviet forces defending the Kursk salient?

The Soviet forces defending the Kursk salient were significantly larger, numbering around 1,910,361 men (with 1,426,352 combat soldiers) across the Central and Voronezh Fronts, plus reserves from the Steppe Front. They fielded approximately 5,128 tanks and assault guns, 25,013 guns and mortars, and 3,549 aircraft.

What new German armored vehicles were introduced or significantly used at the Battle of Kursk?

Germany introduced and utilized new armored vehicles at Kursk, notably the Panther tank, the Ferdinand tank destroyer, and an increased number of Tiger heavy tanks. These advanced weapons were intended to provide a decisive edge.

How did the Soviet Union prepare its defenses in the Kursk salient?

The Soviets constructed a series of deep defensive belts, extending up to 300 kilometers in total depth. These defenses included extensive minefields (with densities six times greater than at Moscow), anti-tank ditches, fortified trenches, dug-in tanks, and numerous bunkers, utilizing the labor of over 300,000 civilians.

What was the role of Soviet partisans in the lead-up to the Battle of Kursk?

Soviet partisans played a crucial role by disrupting German communications and supply lines, particularly behind Army Group Centre. In June 1943 alone, partisan attacks destroyed hundreds of locomotives and railway wagons and damaged numerous bridges, delaying German build-up and requiring the diversion of troops for counter-insurgency operations.

How did the Luftwaffe's strategy change for the Battle of Kursk compared to previous campaigns?

The Luftwaffe abandoned its previous strategy of conducting large-scale raids on Soviet airfields to achieve air superiority, recognizing that Soviet aircraft were easily replaceable. They also rarely attempted to use medium bombers to block enemy reinforcements, focusing instead on direct ground support for Operation Citadel.

What challenges did the Luftwaffe face in preparing for and conducting operations during the Battle of Kursk?

The Luftwaffe faced supply shortfalls, particularly in fuel, due to partisan activity and resource allocation to other fronts. They also lacked reserves of replacement aircraft, limiting their ability to sustain an intensive air effort for an extended period.

What was the significance of the Battle of Prokhorovka?

The Battle of Prokhorovka, occurring on July 12, was a major armored clash within the southern phase of the battle. It involved a massive engagement between Soviet tank armies and German SS Panzer divisions, representing one of the largest tank-on-tank battles in history.

Why was Operation Citadel ultimately terminated?

Operation Citadel was terminated by Hitler on July 13, 1943, primarily due to the Allied invasion of Sicily, which necessitated the diversion of German forces to Italy. Additionally, the unexpected strength of Soviet reserves and the stalling of the German advance contributed to the decision.

What was Operation Kutuzov and what was its objective?

Operation Kutuzov was a Soviet counter-offensive launched on July 12 against the German forces in the Orel salient, north of Kursk. Its objective was to attack the flank and rear of Model's 9th Army, threatening its supply lines and potentially encircling it.

What was Operation Rumyantsev and what were its objectives?

Operation Rumyantsev, also known as the Belgorod-Kharkov offensive operation, was the main Soviet offensive planned for the summer of 1943. Launched on August 3, its aim was to destroy the German 4th Panzer Army and Army Detachment Kempf, liberate Belgorod and Kharkov, and cut off the southern German salient.

How did the Battle of Kursk affect the strategic initiative on the Eastern Front?

The Battle of Kursk marked a decisive shift in the strategic initiative on the Eastern Front. Following this battle, the Soviet Union gained the initiative and maintained it for the remainder of the war, forcing Germany into a defensive posture.

What was the estimated total number of casualties for both sides in the Battle of Kursk?

Estimates for total casualties vary, but are generally considered to be extremely high. Soviet losses are estimated between 1.1 million and 2.3 million (though official figures are lower), while German losses are estimated between 380,000 and 430,000. This makes it one of the costliest battles of World War II.

What were the approximate tank and aircraft losses for the Germans during Operation Citadel?

During Operation Citadel, Germany lost between 252 and 323 tanks and assault guns destroyed or damaged. Luftwaffe losses during the German offensive phase (July 5-16) were approximately 159 aircraft.

What was the significance of the T-34 tank in the Battle of Kursk?

The T-34 was the main Soviet tank and formed the bulk of their armored forces. While a capable medium tank, the original versions with their 76.2mm gun struggled against the frontal armor of German Tiger and Panther tanks, though they were crucial in overwhelming numbers and in close-quarters infantry support roles.

How did the German Panther tank perform during its combat debut at Kursk?

The Panther tank, intended to be a decisive weapon, experienced significant mechanical unreliability during its combat debut at Kursk. Many were lost or immobilized due to transmission problems and breakdowns even before engaging the enemy, and those that did fight suffered heavy losses.

What was the Soviet tactic known as 'maskirovka' and how was it used at Kursk?

'Maskirovka' was a Soviet military deception strategy involving camouflaging positions, constructing dummy airfields and depots, generating false radio traffic, and spreading rumors. At Kursk, it was used to conceal troop movements and defensive preparations, successfully masking the true strength and intentions of the Red Army.

What was the 'ironing' training conducted by the Soviets?

The 'ironing' training was a Soviet method to help soldiers overcome 'tank phobia'. It involved soldiers hiding in trenches or even allowing tanks to drive over them to desensitize them to the threat, preparing them to engage tanks at close range with anti-tank rifles, Molotov cocktails, and demolition charges.

What was the German perspective on the Battle of Kursk, as expressed by Heinz Guderian?

Heinz Guderian, a prominent German tank theorist, expressed significant reservations about Operation Citadel, questioning its necessity and strategic value. He believed the offensive was pointless and would deplete Germany's limited armored resources, which were needed for the defense of Western Europe.

How did the battle's outcome impact the German Army's ability to launch future offensives on the Eastern Front?

The heavy losses in men and tanks sustained by Germany during the Battle of Kursk ensured that the Wehrmacht lost the strategic initiative on the Eastern Front. They were subsequently forced into a reactive defensive role for the remainder of the war, unable to launch major offensive operations.

What was the significance of the Battle of Kursk in terms of armored warfare?

The Battle of Kursk is considered the single deadliest armored battle in history, involving massive concentrations of tanks and armored vehicles from both sides. It showcased the evolving tactics and the critical role of armor in large-scale land warfare during World War II.

What was the significance of July 5, 1943, in the history of aerial warfare?

The opening day of the Battle of Kursk, July 5, 1943, was the single costliest day in the history of aerial warfare in terms of aircraft shot down, highlighting the intense air combat that accompanied the ground operations.

How did the Soviet leadership's approach to military command differ from Hitler's during the battle?

Unlike Hitler, who frequently interfered in operational planning, Stalin generally trusted his commanders and allowed them greater autonomy. This Soviet approach, coupled with robust defensive preparations, contributed to their strategic success, while Hitler's micromanagement and strategic miscalculations ultimately hampered German efforts.

What was the estimated German manpower loss during Operation Citadel?

German manpower losses during Operation Citadel are estimated to be around 54,182 casualties, including killed, wounded, and missing personnel, primarily affecting Army Group Centre and Army Group South.

What was the estimated Soviet manpower loss during the German offensive phase (Operation Citadel)?

Soviet manpower losses during the German offensive phase (July 5-16) are estimated at approximately 177,877 casualties, with the Central and Voronezh Fronts suffering the majority of these losses.

What was the estimated total German manpower loss for the entire Battle of Kursk campaign?

Estimates for total German manpower losses across the entire Battle of Kursk campaign range from 380,000 to 430,000 casualties, encompassing killed, wounded, and missing personnel.

What was the estimated total Soviet manpower loss for the entire Battle of Kursk campaign?

Total Soviet manpower losses for the entire Battle of Kursk campaign are estimated to be significantly higher than German losses, ranging from approximately 685,456 during the Soviet counter-offensives to potentially over 1.2 million according to some Russian historians, though official figures are lower.

What was the outcome of the fighting at Ponyri and Olkhovatka on the northern face?

The fighting at Ponyri and Olkhovatka on the northern face was characterized by intense, attritional battles. Despite German efforts, including the use of Tigers and Ferdinands, they were unable to achieve a decisive breakthrough against the heavily fortified Soviet defenses, leading to heavy casualties on both sides.

How did the terrain and weather conditions affect the battle?

The terrain, characterized by deep defensive systems and minefields, significantly slowed German advances. Additionally, intermittent heavy rains and high temperatures created mud and marshy conditions, further hindering troop and vehicle movement for both sides.

What was the role of the XLVIII Panzer Corps in the southern offensive?

The XLVIII Panzer Corps, part of the 4th Panzer Army, was tasked with advancing along the Oboyan axis on the southern face of the salient. It faced strong Soviet defenses and encountered significant resistance, leading to delays and heavy fighting, particularly around Gertsovka and Mikhailovka.

What was the significance of the Soviet reserve forces, particularly the Steppe Front?

The Steppe Front, commanded by Ivan Konev, served as a crucial strategic reserve for the Soviets. Its eventual commitment to reinforce the Voronezh Front was vital in halting the German advance and preventing a breakthrough into the Soviet rear.

How did the Battle of Kursk impact the development of Soviet military strategy?

The Battle of Kursk demonstrated the effectiveness of the Soviet defense-in-depth strategy and their ability to conduct successful strategic offensives, even in summer. It solidified the shift in strategic initiative to the Red Army and influenced subsequent Soviet military planning and operations for the remainder of the war.

What was the German assessment of the Soviet defensive preparations at Kursk?

German commanders, including Walter Model, recognized the strength and depth of the Soviet defensive positions, with some describing the upcoming battle as comparable to Verdun. Intelligence reports indicated powerful Soviet concentrations, leading to concerns about the feasibility of Operation Citadel.

What was the outcome of the initial Soviet air attacks on German airfields on July 5, 1943?

The initial Soviet air attacks aimed at destroying the Luftwaffe on the ground failed and resulted in considerable losses for the Soviet Air Forces (VVS). German radar systems detected some formations, and the VVS lost 176 aircraft compared to the Luftwaffe's 26 on that day.

How did the Battle of Kursk contribute to the overall turning point of World War II in Europe?

By halting the last major German strategic offensive on the Eastern Front and seizing the initiative, the Battle of Kursk significantly weakened the German war effort. This allowed the Soviets to begin their relentless advance westward and contributed to the eventual Allied victory in the European theater.

What role did the new German Panther tanks play in the battle, and what were their performance issues?

The Panther tanks were introduced as a key element of Operation Citadel, intended to provide a superior armored capability. However, they suffered from mechanical unreliability, with many breaking down before or during combat due to transmission issues and other faults, significantly reducing their operational effectiveness.

What was the German perspective on the overall outcome of Operation Citadel?

From the German perspective, Operation Citadel was a failure. Despite initial advances, the offensive was halted by strong Soviet defenses and counter-attacks, leading to unsustainable losses and the cancellation of the operation, marking the end of Germany's ability to launch major strategic offensives on the Eastern Front.

How did the Battle of Kursk affect the balance of power between Germany and the Soviet Union?

The Battle of Kursk decisively shifted the balance of power, permanently transferring the strategic initiative from Germany to the Soviet Union. Germany's heavy losses meant they could no longer dictate the pace or direction of operations on the Eastern Front.

What was the significance of the Soviet counter-offensives, Operations Kutuzov and Rumyantsev?

These operations were crucial in exploiting the German failure at Kursk. Operation Kutuzov relieved pressure on the northern sector by attacking the Orel salient, while Operation Rumyantsev liberated key cities in the south, pushing the Germans back and firmly establishing Soviet strategic dominance.

What was the estimated number of tanks and assault guns lost by the Soviets during the Battle of Kursk?

Soviet losses in tanks and assault guns were substantial, estimated at 1,614 during the German offensive phase and a further 2,349 during Operation Kutuzov and 1,864 during Operation Rumyantsev, totaling well over 5,000 vehicles lost or damaged throughout the entire campaign.

What was the estimated number of tanks and assault guns lost by the Germans during the Battle of Kursk?

German losses in tanks and assault guns were also significant, with estimates ranging from 252-323 destroyed or damaged during Operation Citadel, and total losses for the entire battle estimated between 2,952 and potentially higher, depending on the source and definition of 'loss'.

Battle Of Kursk Wiki: Kursk Crucible: The Eastern Front's Decisive Clash

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Overview

A Pivotal Engagement

The Battle of Kursk, also known as the Battle of the Kursk Salient, was a monumental World War II engagement on the Eastern Front between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Occurring near Kursk in southwestern Russia during the summer of 1943, it resulted in a decisive Soviet victory.

This battle is recognized as the single largest engagement in military history, often cited alongside the Battle of Stalingrad as a critical turning point in the European theatre of the war. It marked the last major strategic offensive Germany could launch on the Eastern Front.

Unprecedented Scale and Cost

Kursk stands as one of the costliest battles of World War II, characterized by immense casualties and material losses on both sides. It is particularly noted as the deadliest armored confrontation in history.

The opening day, July 5th, recorded the highest number of aircraft downed in a single day in the history of aerial warfare. The battle also featured intense urban warfare and brutal hand-to-hand combat, underscoring its ferocity.

Strategic Objectives

Germany's objective, Operation Citadel, aimed to pinch off the Kursk salient by attacking its base from both the north and south simultaneously. The goal was to encircle and destroy Soviet forces, regain strategic initiative, and bolster German prestige.

Conversely, the Soviet Union, forewarned of German intentions, adopted a strategy of deep, layered defenses designed to attrit the German armored spearheads before launching powerful counter-offensives.

Background

Post-Stalingrad Crisis

Following the Soviet victory at Stalingrad, the Red Army initiated a general offensive in the south. By early 1943, a significant gap had opened between German Army Groups B and Don, threatening to cut off German forces in the Caucasus. Soviet armies advanced, retaking key cities like Kursk in February 1943.

This period saw a strategic crisis for the German forces in the south. Field Marshal Erich von Manstein advocated for operational freedom to counter these threats, receiving approval for counterstrokes against Soviet advances in the Donbas region.

German Reorganization and Soviet Preparations

In February 1943, German forces were reorganized, with Army Group Don renamed Army Group South under Manstein's command. This consolidation included absorbing forces from the dissolved Army Group B, placing Manstein in charge of the large breach in German lines.

Meanwhile, Soviet intelligence, bolstered by sources like the Lucy spy ring and British code-breaking efforts, gained foreknowledge of German plans. Aware of the impending attack on the Kursk salient, the Soviets meticulously constructed extensive defensive fortifications.

Delays and Doubts

German preparations for Operation Citadel were hampered by delays, partly due to the need to build up forces, await new equipment like the Panther tank, and respond to the Allied invasion of Sicily. These postponements allowed the Soviets ample time to strengthen their defenses.

Concerns about the operation's feasibility grew within the German high command, with figures like General Heinz Guderian questioning the necessity and potential outcome of attacking Kursk, given the Soviet preparations and German resource limitations.

Strategy

German Offensive: Operation Citadel

Operation Citadel was conceived as a pincer movement to encircle and destroy Soviet forces within the Kursk salient. Army Group Centre was to attack from the north, while Army Group South would strike from the south, aiming to meet east of Kursk.

The plan relied heavily on armored spearheads, particularly the new Panther and Tiger tanks, to break through Soviet defenses. However, the delays in launching the operation allowed the Soviets to anticipate the German thrusts and prepare formidable defenses.

Soviet Defensive Depth

The Soviet strategy centered on a "defense in depth." They constructed multiple, heavily fortified defensive belts, incorporating vast minefields, anti-tank ditches, trenches, and dug-in armor. These defenses were designed to absorb and exhaust the German armored assault.

A significant reserve force, the Steppe Front under Ivan Konev, was positioned behind the main defensive lines, ready to launch counter-offensives once the German attack was blunted.

Deception and Intelligence

Soviet intelligence played a crucial role, providing detailed information about German plans and troop movements. This allowed the Red Army to anticipate the attack's location and timing.

Furthermore, the Soviets employed extensive deception tactics (*maskirovka*) to conceal their troop concentrations, fortifications, and supply movements. This included dummy airfields, camouflaged positions, and restricted radio traffic, significantly misleading German reconnaissance efforts.

Forces

German Strength

The German forces committed to Operation Citadel represented a significant portion of their strength on the Eastern Front. They fielded approximately 780,000 men, supported by around 2,465 tanks and assault guns (including new Panther and Tiger models) and 7,417 guns and mortars.

Key formations included Army Group Centre's 9th Army and Army Group South's 4th Panzer Army and Army Detachment Kempf. Despite the impressive numbers, the German forces suffered from shortages in infantry and the mechanical unreliability of some new armored vehicles.

Soviet Strength

The Soviet Union mobilized a massive force, estimated at over 1.9 million men, supported by approximately 4,938 tanks and self-propelled guns, and over 31,000 artillery pieces. This force was organized into three Fronts: Central, Voronezh, and the reserve Steppe Front.

The backbone of the Soviet armored force was the T-34 medium tank, supplemented by lighter tanks and lend-lease vehicles. The Soviets also possessed a significant numerical advantage in artillery and aircraft.

Comparative Strength (Operation Citadel)

The battle's initial phase saw a significant Soviet advantage in manpower (approximately 2.8:1) and artillery (4:1). While Soviet tank numbers were also higher (around 2:1), the quality and technological superiority of some German tanks, like the Tiger and Panther, presented a formidable challenge.

Key Figures (Operation Citadel):

Category	Soviet	Ratio	German
Men	1,426,352	2.8:1	518,271
Tanks/Assault Guns	4,938	2:1	2,465
Guns/Mortars	31,415	4:1	7,417

Comparative Strength (Soviet Offensive)

During the subsequent Soviet counter-offensives, the numerical advantages for the Red Army widened significantly across all categories, reflecting their ability to sustain operations and replace losses more effectively.

Key Figures (Soviet Offensive Phase):

Category	Soviet	Ratio	German
Men	1,987,463	3.2:1	625,271
Tanks/Assault Guns	8,200	3:1	2,699
Guns/Mortars	47,416	5:1	9,467

Air War

Luftwaffe's Challenge

By 1943, the Luftwaffe's strength on the Eastern Front had diminished due to losses from previous campaigns and the diversion of resources to other theatres and homeland defense against Allied bombing. While capable of achieving local air superiority, their overall capacity was strained.

Key Luftwaffe assets included Junkers Ju 87 "Stuka" dive bombers, some equipped with 37mm cannons for anti-tank roles, and Focke-Wulf Fw 190 ground attack variants. However, supply shortages, particularly fuel, limited their ability to sustain prolonged operations.

Soviet Air Superiority

The Soviet Air Force (VVS) had significantly improved by 1943, fielding more modern aircraft like the Yakovlev Yak-9 and Lavochkin La-5 fighters, which offered near parity with Luftwaffe fighters. The VVS also deployed large numbers of Ilyushin Il-2 "Shturmovik" ground attack aircraft.

With substantial reserves of aircraft and supplies, and benefiting from effective deception tactics that misled German intelligence about their true strength, the VVS was able to contest and often dominate the air, providing crucial close air support and interdiction.

Outcome

Soviet Victory

The Battle of Kursk concluded with a decisive Soviet victory. The German offensive, Operation Citadel, failed to achieve its objectives of encircling the salient. German armored forces were significantly attrited, and their offensive capability was severely degraded.

The Soviet counter-offensives, Operations Kutuzov and Rumyantsev, successfully pushed German forces back, recapturing territory and inflicting heavy losses.

Devastating Casualties

The battle was exceptionally costly for both sides. German casualties are estimated between 203,000 and 430,000 (killed, wounded, missing, captured), with significant losses in tanks and aircraft.

Soviet casualties were even higher, estimated at over 863,000 (killed, wounded, sick, captured), reflecting the scale of the defensive and counter-offensive operations. Tank and aircraft losses were also substantial.

Strategic Shift

The failure of Operation Citadel and the heavy losses sustained marked the end of Germany's ability to launch major strategic offensives on the Eastern Front. The strategic initiative permanently passed to the Soviet Union.

The battle demonstrated the growing strength and capability of the Red Army and set the stage for subsequent Soviet advances that would ultimately lead to the defeat of Nazi Germany.

Legacy

Turning Point Confirmed

Kursk is widely regarded as a critical turning point in World War II. It definitively ended Germany's offensive capacity on the Eastern Front, shifting the strategic momentum irrevocably in favor of the Soviet Union.

The battle showcased the effectiveness of Soviet defensive preparations, operational planning, and the resilience of the Red Army, even when facing technologically advanced German armor.

Armored Warfare Evolution

The sheer scale of armored combat at Kursk, particularly the engagement at Prokhorovka, provided invaluable lessons in tank warfare. It highlighted the importance of combined arms tactics, effective reconnaissance, and the logistical challenges of large-scale armored operations.

The battle also underscored the critical role of intelligence and deception in modern warfare.

Global Impact

By absorbing and repelling the last major German offensive in the East, the Soviet Union's victory at Kursk significantly contributed to the eventual Allied victory in Europe. It eased pressure on the Western Allies, who were engaged in North Africa and preparing for the invasion of Italy.

The battle's immense cost and strategic significance cemented its place as one of the most defining military confrontations of the 20th century.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "Battle Of Kursk" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about battle_of_kursk while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

king street bridge melbourne

nassau county new york

References

Operation Citadel refers to the German offensive from 4 to 16 July, but Soviet losses are for the period of 5â23 July.

The whole Battle of Kursk refers to the period of the German offensive (Operation Citadel) and the subsequent Soviet counteroffensives, from 4 July to 23 August.

Figures for 5â31 July, as given by the Luftwaffe logistics staff (Generalquartiermeister der Luftwaffe).

Over 105,000 in April and as much as 300,000 in June. Zetterling & Frankson 2000, p. 22.

Frieser uses combat strengths.[4]

Frieser counts only operational tanks.[208]

Glantz uses total strengths.[6]

Glantz uses total strengths.[209]

Glantz does not count reinforcements.[210]

BergstrÃ¶m 2007, pp. 123â125: Figures are from German archives. Bundesarchiv-Militararchiv, Freiburg; Luftfahrtmuseum, Hannover-Laatzen; WASt Deutsche Dienststelle, Berlin.

U.S. Army Concepts Analysis Agency, Kursk Operation Simulation and Validation Exercise â Phase III (KOSAVE II), pp. 5â14 through 5â15.

Zetterling & Frankson 2000, pp. 117, 116, and endnote 18: For all participating armies in the Kursk area, there were 203,000 casualties for July and August.

Krivosheev 2001, p. Kursk.

N. Ivanov, A. Georgievsky and O. Lobastov. "Soviet health care and military medicine in the Great Patriotic War of 1941â1945". p. 205

"Kursk Press releases July 1943". Dial Pixpex News. Retrieved 2 June 2013

Glantz & House 2004, pp. 28â29, mentions Nikolai Vatutin and Mikhail Malinin.

Soviet Storm: Operation Barbarossa 2011.

Glantz 1986, p. 19, Glantz states 1,500 anti-tank mines per kilometre and 1,700 anti-personnel mines per kilometre..

Glantz & House 2004, p. 65, Glantz states there were 2,400 anti-tank and 2,700 anti-personnel mines per mile..

BergstrÃ¶m 2007, pp. 79â81, 102, 106, 114, 118.

Clark 2012, p. 299, tank losses are given as 50 in the first air raid and another 30 in subsequent air raids.

Glantz & House 2004, p. 130, the map shows 18â20 miles.

Zetterling & Frankson 2000, p. 90, this places it at 28 km at the end of 7 July.

A full list of references for this article are available at the Battle of Kursk Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not military advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional military analysis, strategic planning, or historical consultation. Always refer to primary sources and consult with qualified military historians or strategists for specific needs. Never disregard professional advice because of something you have read on this website.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.

Kursk Crucible

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

Overview 🗺️

💥 A Pivotal Engagement

🔥 Unprecedented Scale and Cost

🎯 Strategic Objectives

Background ⏳

📉 Post-Stalingrad Crisis

🔄 German Reorganization and Soviet Preparations

🤔 Delays and Doubts

Strategy 🎯

⚔️ German Offensive: Operation Citadel

🧱 Soviet Defensive Depth

🎭 Deception and Intelligence

Forces 🛡️

🇩🇪 German Strength

🇷🇺 Soviet Strength

📊 Comparative Strength (Operation Citadel)

⚖️ Comparative Strength (Soviet Offensive)

Air War ✈️

💨 Luftwaffe's Challenge

🚀 Soviet Air Superiority

Outcome 🏆

✅ Soviet Victory

💀 Devastating Casualties

➡️ Strategic Shift

Legacy 📜

⭐ Turning Point Confirmed

🛡️ Armored Warfare Evolution

🌍 Global Impact

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

Overview

A Pivotal Engagement

Unprecedented Scale and Cost

Strategic Objectives

Background

Post-Stalingrad Crisis

German Reorganization and Soviet Preparations

Delays and Doubts

Strategy

German Offensive: Operation Citadel

Soviet Defensive Depth

Deception and Intelligence

Forces

German Strength

Soviet Strength

Comparative Strength (Operation Citadel)

Comparative Strength (Soviet Offensive)

Air War

Luftwaffe's Challenge

Soviet Air Superiority

Outcome

Soviet Victory

Devastating Casualties

Strategic Shift

Legacy

Turning Point Confirmed

Armored Warfare Evolution

Global Impact

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Disclaimer

Important Notice