What is the primary subject of the provided text?

The provided text details the bidding process for the 2016 Summer Olympics and Paralympics, outlining the cities that submitted bids, the evaluation process, the final election, and the results.

How many cities initially submitted bids to host the 2016 Summer Olympics and Paralympics?

Seven cities initially submitted bids to host the 2016 Summer Olympics and Paralympics.

What was the deadline for submitting initial bids for the 2016 Games?

The deadline for submitting initial bids was September 13, 2007.

Which four cities were ultimately shortlisted by the IOC Executive Board as Candidate Cities for the 2016 Games?

The four cities shortlisted as Candidate Cities were Chicago, Madrid, Rio de Janeiro, and Tokyo.

On what date did the IOC Executive Board announce the shortlist of candidate cities?

The IOC Executive Board announced the shortlist of candidate cities on June 4, 2008.

Which three cities were eliminated after the initial application phase and did not make the shortlist?

The three cities eliminated after the initial application phase were Baku, Doha, and Prague.

Where and when was the final decision made regarding the host city for the 2016 Summer Olympics and Paralympics?

The final decision was made during the 121st IOC Session in Copenhagen, Denmark, on October 2, 2009.

Which city was awarded the right to host the 2016 Summer Olympics and Paralympics?

Rio de Janeiro was awarded the right to host the 2016 Summer Olympics and Paralympics.

Who was the runner-up in the final round of voting for the 2016 Games?

Madrid was the runner-up in the final round of voting for the 2016 Games.

What significant milestones did Rio de Janeiro achieve by winning the bid?

Rio de Janeiro's selection marked significant milestones: Brazil became the first Lusophone country, meaning a country where Portuguese is the primary language, to host the Summer Olympics, and Rio de Janeiro became the first city in South America to host this major global event.

What characterized the overall bidding process for the 2016 Games?

The bidding process was described as lengthy, intensive, and marked by several controversies, including espionage, racism, and opposition movements.

According to the Olympic Charter, what are the two phases of the bidding process since 1999?

Since 1999, the Olympic bidding process consists of two phases: the Applicant phase, where cities submit initial applications and questionnaires, and the Candidature phase, for cities that meet the IOC's criteria.

What is the purpose of the questionnaire submitted by applicant cities?

The questionnaire allows the IOC to analyze the cities' hosting capacities and identify the strengths and weaknesses of their proposed plans for organizing the Games.

What is the role of the IOC Evaluation Commission?

The IOC Evaluation Commission analyzes the candidature files submitted by cities, conducts on-site inspections of proposed venues and facilities, and compiles a report to inform IOC members before the final vote.

How is the host city ultimately elected by the IOC Session?

The host city is elected by the assembled active IOC members through a three-round exhaustive ballot process. A bid must achieve an absolute majority, meaning more than half of the votes cast, to be successful. If no bid reaches this threshold, the city with the fewest votes is eliminated, and the process continues until a winner is determined.

What was the benchmark score used by the IOC Working Group to assess applicant cities' capabilities?

The IOC Working Group set a benchmark score of six (on a scale of 0 to 10) as the minimum required grade for a city to be considered highly capable of hosting the Games.

Which city received the highest total average score from the IOC Working Group's assessment across all criteria?

Rio de Janeiro received the highest total average score, with an overall rating of 8.3.

Which city received the lowest total average score from the IOC Working Group's assessment?

Baku received the lowest total average score, with an overall rating of 4.3.

Did the IOC strictly adhere to the scoring system when shortlisting cities, and if not, what exception was noted?

No, the IOC did not strictly adhere to the scoring system alone. The text notes that the IOC selected Rio de Janeiro over Doha, which had a higher score, indicating that other factors beyond the numerical assessment were considered in the shortlisting process.

Who headed the Evaluation Commission for the 2016 Olympic bids?

The Evaluation Commission for the 2016 Olympic bids was headed by Nawal El Moutawakel of Morocco.

How did the duration of the Evaluation Commission's site visits change for the 2016 bids compared to previous years?

The duration of the Evaluation Commission's site visits was extended from the typical four days to seven days for the 2016 bids.

How many rounds of voting were required at the 121st IOC Session to determine the 2016 host city?

Three rounds of voting were required at the 121st IOC Session to determine the host city for the 2016 Summer Olympics.

What were the vote counts for Rio de Janeiro and Madrid in the final round of voting?

In the final round, Rio de Janeiro received 66 votes, while Madrid received 32 votes.

Which candidate city was eliminated in the first round of voting?

Chicago was eliminated in the first round of voting.

Which candidate city was eliminated in the second round of voting?

Tokyo was eliminated in the second round of voting.

What was Rio de Janeiro's previous experience with Olympic bids before winning the 2016 bid?

Rio de Janeiro had made four previous unsuccessful bids for the Summer Olympics, in 1936, 1940, 2004, and 2012.

What event significantly boosted Rio de Janeiro's credibility as a potential host city?

The successful organization of the XV Pan American Games in 2007 significantly boosted Rio de Janeiro's credibility, with the president of the Pan American Sports Organisation calling it the best in history.

What was a key advantage of Madrid's bid for the 2016 Games?

A key advantage of Madrid's bid was that 85% of its proposed venues were already in place, and the city had experience hosting Olympic qualifying events from its previous bid for the 2012 Games.

What potential challenge did Madrid face regarding the geographical rotation of Olympic host cities?

Madrid faced a potential challenge because Europe had recently hosted the 2012 Summer Olympics (London) and was scheduled to host the 2014 Winter Olympics (Sochi), raising concerns about hosting successive Games on the same continent.

What past Olympic hosting experience did Tokyo possess that benefited its 2016 bid?

Tokyo's bid benefited from Japan's experience hosting the 1964 Summer Olympics in Tokyo, the 1972 Winter Games in Sapporo, and the 1998 Winter Games in Nagano.

What factor might have hindered Tokyo's bid for the 2016 Games?

The proximity of the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympics, held just a year earlier, might have hindered Tokyo's bid, as the IOC sometimes avoids awarding Games to the same continent in consecutive cycles.

What was a reported weakness of Chicago's bid despite its strong infrastructure and financial backing?

A reported weakness of Chicago's bid was lower local public support compared to other candidate cities, and some media outlets were reportedly critical of the bid.

What were the primary reasons cited for Baku's elimination from the bidding process?

Baku was eliminated due to deteriorated infrastructure since the Soviet era, regional political conflicts in the South Caucasus, an underdeveloped tourist sector, and a limited Olympic legacy as a relatively new independent nation.

What were the main obstacles for Doha's bid that led to its elimination?

Doha's bid faced obstacles including extreme summer temperatures (leading to a proposed October date, outside IOC norms), a small population, and insufficient existing facilities.

What were the key challenges faced by Prague's bid?

Prague's bid faced challenges such as a lack of existing venues requiring significant new construction, lower public support within the Czech Republic, and concerns raised by officials about budget estimates and potential 'white elephants'.

What were the proposed dates for the Rio de Janeiro Summer Olympic Games?

The proposed dates for the Rio de Janeiro Summer Olympic Games were August 5 to August 21, 2016.

What were the proposed dates for the Madrid Summer Olympic Games?

The proposed dates for the Madrid Summer Olympic Games were August 5 to August 21, 2016.

What were the proposed dates for the Tokyo Summer Olympic Games?

The proposed dates for the Tokyo Summer Olympic Games were July 29 to August 14, 2016.

What were the proposed dates for the Chicago Summer Olympic Games?

The text does not specify the proposed dates for the Chicago Summer Olympic Games.

Which two websites specialize in predicting Olympic bid indices?

Two websites, GamesBids.com and Around the Rings, specialize in analyzing and predicting the outcomes of Olympic bids.

What are the names of the prediction indices mentioned for Olympic bids?

The prediction indices mentioned are the BidIndex by GamesBids.com and the Power Index by Around the Rings.

Did the predicting indices accurately forecast the winner of the 2016 bid?

Yes, both the BidIndex and Power Index correctly predicted Rio de Janeiro as the winner of the 2016 bid.

What prediction did the indices fail to accurately foresee regarding Chicago's bid?

The indices did not accurately foresee Chicago's performance, as they did not predict its early elimination in the first round of voting, despite its strong overall scores.

What was the weighted average score for Rio de Janeiro in the IOC Working Group's assessment?

Rio de Janeiro received a weighted average score of 8.3 from the IOC Working Group.

What was the weighted average score for Madrid in the IOC Working Group's assessment?

Madrid received a weighted average score of 8.1 from the IOC Working Group.

What was the weighted average score for Tokyo in the IOC Working Group's assessment?

Tokyo received a weighted average score of 6.4 from the IOC Working Group.

What was the weighted average score for Chicago in the IOC Working Group's assessment?

Chicago received a weighted average score of 7.0 from the IOC Working Group.

What was the weighted average score for Doha in the IOC Working Group's assessment?

Doha received a weighted average score of 6.9 from the IOC Working Group.

What was the weighted average score for Prague in the IOC Working Group's assessment?

Prague received a weighted average score of 5.3 from the IOC Working Group.

What was the weighted average score for Baku in the IOC Working Group's assessment?

Baku received a weighted average score of 4.3 from the IOC Working Group.

What was the total number of IOC members eligible to vote in the first round of the 2016 host city election?

There were 95 IOC members eligible to vote in the first round of the 2016 host city election.

Bids For The 2016 Summer Olympics Wiki: The Olympic Pursuit: Charting the 2016 Bid Journey

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

The Bidding Landscape

Initial Submissions

The journey to host the 2016 Summer Olympics and Paralympics commenced with seven cities submitting their bids by the deadline of September 13, 2007. These cities were recognized as Applicant cities by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) on September 14, 2007.

Shortlisting Process

Following a rigorous evaluation of initial applications, the IOC Executive Board, on June 4, 2008, identified four cities as Candidate cities. These were Chicago, Madrid, Rio de Janeiro, and Tokyo, representing the strongest contenders.

The cities of Baku, Doha, and Prague, despite submitting applications, were not selected for the shortlist, indicating areas where their bids were deemed less competitive by the IOC's initial assessment.

The Ultimate Winner

After a competitive and closely watched election process, Rio de Janeiro emerged victorious, securing the rights to host the XXXI Olympiad and XV Paralympic Games. This marked a historic occasion, making Rio the first South American city to host the Summer Olympics.

The Olympic Bid Procedure

IOC Framework

The Olympic bidding process is meticulously governed by the Olympic Charter. It involves distinct phases, beginning with the submission of applications by National Olympic Committees (NOCs) and culminating in the election of a host city by the IOC members.

Application Phase

Cities first submit applications, followed by detailed questionnaires addressing critical aspects like political support, infrastructure, venues, finance, and legacy. An IOC Working Group analyzes these responses, assigning scores to assess hosting capabilities and identify potential candidate cities.

Candidature Phase

Shortlisted cities submit comprehensive candidature files. An IOC Evaluation Commission conducts on-site inspections and issues a technical appraisal report to IOC members prior to the final election session.

The Contenders

Rio de Janeiro

Country: Brazil
NOC: Brazilian Olympic Committee (COB)
Result: Winner

Rio de Janeiro's bid marked its fifth attempt, finally succeeding after previous efforts for 1936, 1940, 2004, and 2012. The city leveraged its successful hosting of the 2007 Pan American Games and its status as the first South American city to bid.

Madrid

Country: Spain
NOC: Spanish Olympic Committee (COE)
Result: First runner-up

Madrid's bid benefited from strong infrastructure and experience from its 2012 bid. The city had a high level of public support and a compact venue plan, making it a formidable contender.

Tokyo

Country: Japan
NOC: Japanese Olympic Committee (JOC)
Result: Second runner-up

Tokyo presented itself as a candidate for the "most compact and efficient Games ever," drawing on Japan's extensive experience hosting previous Olympic events. Despite strong technical aspects, public support and the proximity of the Beijing Games were potential factors.

Chicago

Country: United States
NOC: United States Olympic Committee (USOC)
Result: Third runner-up

Chicago was considered a strong contender with significant backing, including from then-President Barack Obama. However, it was unexpectedly eliminated first in the voting rounds, highlighting the unpredictable nature of the IOC selection process.

Baku

Country: Azerbaijan
NOC: National Olympic Committee of the Azerbaijani Republic
Result: Not shortlisted

Baku's bid faced challenges related to infrastructure development and regional political stability, despite the nation's economic capacity.

Doha

Country: Qatar
NOC: Qatar Olympic Committee (QOC)
Result: Not shortlisted

Doha's bid was impacted by concerns over its proposed October dates due to high summer temperatures and its relatively small population, despite strong regional support and modern facilities.

Prague

Country: Czech Republic
NOC: Czech Olympic Committee (ČOV)
Result: Not shortlisted

Prague's bid, while culturally appealing, struggled with a lack of existing venues and public support, leading to its elimination from the shortlist.

Evaluation Metrics

IOC Working Group Assessment

The IOC Working Group evaluated Applicant cities based on eleven themes, assigning weighted scores. Key areas included government support, infrastructure, sports venues, Olympic Village, environmental impact, accommodation, transport, security, past experience, finance, and overall project legacy. A benchmark score of 6 (out of 10) was established.

The table below illustrates the scores awarded by the IOC Working Group, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each city's bid across various criteria.

IOC Working Group Scores for 2016 Applicant Cities
Criteria	Weight	Baku		Chicago		Doha		Madrid		Prague		Rio de Janeiro		Tokyo
		🇦🇿 AZE		🇺🇸 USA		🇶🇦 QAT		🇪🇸 ESP		🇨🇿 CZE		🇧🇷 BRA		🇯🇵 JPN
		Min	Max	Min	Max	Min	Max	Min	Max	Min	Max	Min	Max	Min	Max
Accommodation	5	2.6	4.8	9.4	9.8	5.5	7.7	7.8	8.8	5.1	5.8	5.5	6.4	9.6	10.0
Environmental conditions and impact	2	4.2	6.0	6.0	8.0	6.4	8.2	7.4	8.8	5.4	7.4	5.6	7.6	7.6	8.8
Experience from past sports events	2	3.8	6.4	5.4	8.0	6.0	7.6	7.2	8.2	4.4	6.4	6.6	7.9	6.0	8.0
Finance	3	4.8	6.4	6.5	8.0	6.7	8.6	6.5	8.5	4.8	6.7	6.0	7.7	7.0	8.5
General infrastructure	5	3.8	5.6	5.5	7.4	5.5	7.5	7.9	8.9	4.2	6.0	5.3	7.2	7.6	8.9
Government support, legal issues and public opinion	3	5.7	7.4	6.2	7.9	7.0	8.7	7.5	9.0	4.3	6.7	7.3	8.8	7.0	8.5
Olympic Village(s)	3	6.8	8.1	7.0	8.6	6.9	8.6	7.4	8.7	4.9	7.2	6.0	7.7	7.5	8.9
Overall project and legacy	3	3.0	5.0	5.0	8.0	5.0	7.0	8.0	9.0	4.0	5.0	5.5	8.0	7.0	9.0
Safety and security	3	4.4	5.8	7.1	8.2	5.5	7.1	7.1	7.9	4.4	6.1	4.6	7.0	7.9	9.0
Sports venues	4	3.2	5.6	5.8	7.2	6.8	8.2	7.9	8.8	5.0	6.3	5.8	7.4	6.9	8.7
Transport concept	3	6.0	8.5	5.3	7.8	6.5	8.3	8.0	9.0	4.8	7.0	5.5	7.5	7.5	8.5
Total average		4.3		7.0		6.9		8.1		5.3		6.4		8.3

Evaluation Commission

Chaired by Nawal El Moutawakel, the Evaluation Commission conducted site visits and issued a comprehensive technical appraisal. Their report, released one month before the election, provided crucial insights into the feasibility and strengths of each candidate city's proposal.

The Decisive Election

Copenhagen Session

The 121st IOC Session, held in Copenhagen, Denmark, on October 2, 2009, was the venue for the final decision. Representatives from the candidate cities presented their cases before the IOC members cast their votes.

Voting Rounds

The election employed an exhaustive ballot system. Chicago was eliminated in the first round, followed by Tokyo in the second round, leaving Madrid and Rio de Janeiro to compete in the final round.

The voting process involved multiple rounds to determine the winning bid:

City	NOC	Round 1	Round 2	Round 3
Rio de Janeiro	🇧🇷 Brazil (COB)	26	46	66
Madrid	🇪🇸 Spain (COE)	28	29	32
Tokyo	🇯🇵 Japan (JOC)	22	20	—
Chicago	🇺🇸 United States (USOC)	18	—	—

The Outcome

Rio de Janeiro secured victory by defeating Madrid in the final round with a vote count of 66 to 32. This decision was announced by IOC President Jacques Rogge, marking a significant moment in Olympic history.

Key Dates

Bid Submission

First Bid Deadline: September 13, 2007

Applicant City Responses Due: January 14, 2008

Shortlisting

Candidate Cities Announced: June 4, 2008

Evaluation Commission Reports Released: September 2, 2009

The Decision

IOC Session & Host City Election: October 2, 2009

Proposed Games Dates:

Summer Olympics: August 5 - 21, 2016
Summer Paralympics: September 7 - 18, 2016

Predictive Indices

Analytical Tools

Specialized websites like GamesBids.com (BidIndex) and Around the Rings (Power Index) provided unofficial predictions and analyses of the bids. These indices aimed to rate bids based on various factors, offering insights into their potential success.

The following table presents the unofficial predicting indices assigned to the bidding cities:

Unofficial Predicting Indices for 2016 Olympic Bids
Bidding City	GamesBids BidIndex	Around the Rings PowerIndex
Baku	36.43	...
Chicago	61.24	83
Doha	53.46	...
Madrid	57.80	80
Prague	37.17	...
Rio de Janeiro	61.42	84
Tokyo	59.02	80

Notably, both indices correctly predicted Rio de Janeiro as the winner but did not accurately forecast Chicago's early elimination or Madrid's strong final performance.

Key Notes & Observations

Bid Strengths

Cities like Madrid and Tokyo were noted for their strong infrastructure and prior Olympic experience. Chicago benefited from significant political and media support, while Rio de Janeiro leveraged its growing international profile and historic first for South America.

Challenges Faced

Cities not shortlisted, such as Baku and Doha, faced hurdles related to infrastructure, political stability, or climate. Prague's bid was hampered by a lack of existing venues and lower public enthusiasm.

Unforeseen Outcomes

The early elimination of Chicago, widely considered a favorite, underscored the complex and sometimes unpredictable dynamics of the IOC voting process. The final decision highlighted the IOC's consideration of geographic diversity and historical significance.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "Bids For The 2016 Summer Olympics" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about bids_for_the_2016_summer_olympics while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

15th united states congress

nascar craftsman truck series at bristol

fonseca singer

connected farm

section 27 of the canadian charter of rights and freedoms

References

Madrid 2016 Extends Competition Venues Area

Madrid 2016 Bid Gets Major Citizen Support

Tokyo 2016 Gets 62 Per Cent Public Support

Ninety Two Million Citizens Support Tokyo 2016 Bid

Poll Shows Millions In Japan Aware Of Tokyo 2016 Bid

Marathon Boosts Tokyo 2016 Bid

IOC Member Assesses Olympic Bids

St Louis 1904 Games of the III Olympiad

Creation of Chicago Sports

Olympic Bid Roundup

Organizing Committee Established For Baku 2016 Bid

Baku 2016 Unveils Logo

Qatar will bid for 2016 Olympics

Qatar will gain much more than the money it spent on Asian Games

Qatar 2016 Bid Gets Support From OCA President

A Run For the Money

Doha 2016 Reveals Olympic Bid Logo

Prague 2016 Unveils Bid Plans

Prague Assembly Confirms 2016 Olympic Bid

Public Support Only 50% For Prague 2016: Bid Questionnaire Response

2016 Tingalpa Olympics - ABC Brisbane (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Thailand To Bid For 2016 Summer Olympic Games

(in French) La Flandre veut ses JO, DH.be, 19 Sep 2003

Argentina Wants To Bid For Olympics

BBC News: Delhi set for 2016 bid

BBC News: Delhi will bid for 2020 Olympics

Dubai To Build Sports City Ahead of 2016 Bid

Sapporo Japan Opts Out Of 2016 Summer Bid

Chicago Chosen to Bid for 2016 Olympic Games

Istanbul Refrains From 5th Consecutive Olympic Bid - Will Bid For 2020 Games Instead

Portugal Considers 2016 Summer Games Bid

Mexico's Olympic Committee Rejects Monterrey's 2016 Olympic Bid

Third time lucky for T.O. Games bid?, www.TheStar.com, July 10, 2007

Montreal Contemplates Bid For 2016 Summer Olympic Games - GamesBids.com

Kenya Is Making A Surprise Bid For The 2016 Summer Olympic Games, GamesBids.com, 12 Jan 2005, accessed 12 Oct 2006

Rome To Become Italyâs 2016 Olympic Bid Candidate, GamesBids.com, 3 Oct 2006, accessed 12 Oct 2006

BidIndex 2016

A full list of references for this article are available at the Bids for the 2016 Summer Olympics Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This content has been generated by an AI model for educational and informational purposes. It is based on publicly available data from Wikipedia regarding the bids for the 2016 Summer Olympics. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy and adherence to the source material, the information may not be exhaustive or entirely up-to-date.

This is not official Olympic Committee documentation or a substitute for professional analysis. The information provided should not be considered definitive advice on sports event bidding, international relations, or historical analysis. Always consult official sources and expert opinions for critical decision-making.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors, omissions, or actions taken based on the information presented herein.

The Olympic Pursuit

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

The Bidding Landscape 🌍

🏁 Initial Submissions

⭐ Shortlisting Process

🏆 The Ultimate Winner

The Olympic Bid Procedure 📜

🏛️ IOC Framework

📝 Application Phase

🔍 Candidature Phase

The Contenders 📍

🇧🇷 Rio de Janeiro

🇪🇸 Madrid

🇯🇵 Tokyo

🇺🇸 Chicago

🇦🇿 Baku

🇶🇦 Doha

🇨🇿 Prague

Evaluation Metrics 📊

⚖️ IOC Working Group Assessment

📈 Evaluation Commission

The Decisive Election 🗳️

🇨🇵 Copenhagen Session

Round 1 Voting Rounds

🏅 The Outcome

Key Dates 📅

🗓️ Bid Submission

✅ Shortlisting

🏆 The Decision

Predictive Indices 📈

💻 Analytical Tools

Key Notes & Observations 💡

⭐ Bid Strengths

⚠️ Challenges Faced

🤔 Unforeseen Outcomes

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

The Bidding Landscape

Initial Submissions

Shortlisting Process

The Ultimate Winner

The Olympic Bid Procedure

IOC Framework

Application Phase

Candidature Phase

The Contenders

Rio de Janeiro

Madrid

Tokyo

Chicago

Baku

Doha

Prague

Evaluation Metrics

IOC Working Group Assessment

Evaluation Commission

The Decisive Election

Copenhagen Session

Voting Rounds

The Outcome

Key Dates

Bid Submission

Shortlisting

The Decision

Predictive Indices

Analytical Tools

Key Notes & Observations

Bid Strengths

Challenges Faced

Unforeseen Outcomes

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Disclaimer

Important Notice