What is the primary definition of Close Air Support (CAS)?

Close Air Support (CAS) is defined as aerial warfare actions, typically air-to-ground operations like strafes or airstrikes, conducted by military aircraft against hostile targets that are in close proximity to friendly forces. This type of fire support requires detailed integration of each air mission with the fire and movement of all involved forces.

What types of aerial warfare actions are typically involved in Close Air Support?

Close Air Support primarily involves air-to-ground actions such as strafes, which are attacks with machine guns or cannons, and airstrikes, which involve dropping bombs or firing missiles. These actions are performed by military aircraft to support ground troops.

What is the determining factor for an action to be classified as Close Air Support?

The determining factor for an action to be classified as Close Air Support is the requirement for detailed integration of the air mission with the fire and movement of all friendly forces involved, due to the close proximity of hostile targets to those forces.

How does Close Air Support relate to battlefield air interdiction?

Close Air Support is a closely related subset of air interdiction. Specifically, battlefield air interdiction refers to interdiction against enemy units that have near-term effects on friendly units but does not require the same detailed integration with friendly troop movements as CAS does.

What types of weapons can be used in Close Air Support missions?

Close Air Support missions can be conducted using a variety of weapons, including aerial bombs, glide bombs, missiles, rockets, autocannons, machine guns, and even directed-energy weapons such as lasers.

When did the use of aircraft for close air support first become significant?

The use of aircraft in close air support of ground forces dates back to World War I, which was the first conflict to make significant military use of aerial forces. This marked the beginning of integrating air power directly into ground combat operations.

What was the initial impact of World War I aircraft in CAS, despite their limited destructive power?

Despite the relatively limited direct effect of rifle caliber machine guns and light bombs from World War I aircraft compared to later eras, CAS aircraft were still able to achieve a powerful psychological impact. They served as a visible and personal enemy to hostile troops, while simultaneously providing friendly forces with visible proof of support from their superiors.

What challenges did early CAS coordination face during World War I?

Early CAS coordination during World War I faced significant challenges due to the primitive nature of air-to-ground radio communication, making it relatively difficult to plan and execute coordinated attacks between aerial and ground units effectively.

When was a dedicated air support doctrine first elaborated and specialized fighters put into service during WWI?

While aviators engaged in sporadic attacks on ground forces from the commencement of hostilities in 1914, it was not until 1916 that an air support doctrine was elaborated and dedicated fighter aircraft for the job were put into service, recognizing the demoralizing effect air attacks had on troops in trenches.

How did the Battle of the Somme contribute to the development of CAS tactics?

At the Battle of the Somme, 18 British armed reconnaissance planes improvised an assault by strafing enemy trenches after surveillance operations. The success of this unplanned attack spurred innovation in CAS tactics on both sides of the conflict.

What were some of the first ground-attack aircraft debuted by the British in 1917?

In 1917, following the Second Battle of the Aisne, the British debuted the first ground-attack aircraft, which included a modified F.E 2b fighter carrying 20 lb bombs and mounted machine guns. Other modified planes used in this role were the Airco DH.5 and the Sopwith Camel, with the latter proving particularly successful.

What role did air support play in the 1917 Battle of Cambrai?

Air support was first integrated into a battle plan on a large scale at the 1917 Battle of Cambrai, where a significant number of tanks were deployed. Despite high pilot casualties due to effective enemy anti-aircraft tactics, air support was later judged to have been of critical importance in areas where infantry forces were pinned down.

How did British doctrine differentiate between types of air support during WWI?

At this time, British doctrine came to recognize two forms of air support: trench strafing, which is the modern-day doctrine of CAS, and ground strafing, which is the modern-day doctrine of air interdiction, involving attacks on tactical ground targets away from the immediate land battle.

What innovations did the Germans introduce in CAS aircraft during World War I?

The Germans quickly adopted ground attack warfare, preferring heavier two-seater planes like the Hannover CL.II with an additional machine gunner. They also built the first purpose-built ground attack aircraft, the Junkers J.I, which is depicted in the source material as a First World War German ground-attack aircraft.

What was the significance of German *Schlasta* squadrons during the 1918 German spring offensive?

During the 1918 German spring offensive, the Germans employed 30 squadrons, known as *Schlasta*, of ground attack fighters. These units were able to achieve some initial tactical success, demonstrating the growing effectiveness of dedicated CAS units.

How did CAS aircraft contribute to the British victory in the Sinai and Palestine Campaign of 1918?

In the Sinai and Palestine Campaign of 1918, CAS aircraft were a crucial factor in the ultimate British victory. After achieving air superiority, squadrons of S.E 5a's and D.H. 4s conducted wide-ranging attacks against German and Turkish positions, which, combined with a ground assault, led to the collapse and rout of three Turkish armies.

What were the differing views on CAS between aviators and ground officers during the interwar period?

During the interwar period, aviators generally sought independence from ground commanders and emphasized interdiction and strategic bombing, viewing CAS as difficult and inefficient. In contrast, ground officers argued that artillery was often insufficient and that aircraft offered flexibility for massing firepower and producing a greater psychological effect, without rendering ground untrafficable like massive artillery strikes.

Which conflicts during the interwar period saw notable use of CAS?

The interwar period saw the use of CAS in a number of conflicts, including the Polish–Soviet War, the Spanish Civil War, the Iraqi revolt of 1920, and the Gran Chaco War.

How did the British Royal Air Force utilize air power in colonial hotspots during the interwar period?

The British Royal Air Force extensively used air power in colonial hotspots in the Middle East and North Africa during the interwar period. This included contributing to the defeat of the Afghan military, supporting ground operations in the Somaliland campaign with Z Force, and establishing RAF Iraq Command for cost-effective control of large areas, effectively suppressing the Great Iraqi Revolution of 1920 and other tribal revolts. The source material includes an image illustrating this extensive use of British air power for policing various regions in the Middle East during this period.

What impact did the German Condor Legion have on Luftwaffe CAS doctrine during the Spanish Civil War?

During the Spanish Civil War, German volunteer aviators of the Condor Legion, fighting on the Nationalist side, developed close air support tactics that proved highly influential for the subsequent Luftwaffe doctrine, despite receiving little official support from their government.

What dive-bombing tactics did U.S. Marine Aviators experiment with during the Banana Wars?

U.S. Marine Corps Aviation, acting as an intervention force in support of ground forces during the Banana Wars in places like Haiti, the Dominican Republic, and Nicaragua, experimented with air-ground tactics and adopted the technique of dive bombing.

What arguments did military theorists like J. F. C. Fuller and Basil Liddell Hart make for CAS?

Military theorists such as J. F. C. Fuller and Basil Liddell Hart expounded upon the importance of CAS during the interwar period, despite prevailing indifference. Hart, an advocate of Blitzkrieg tactics, argued that low-flying aircraft could serve as 'more mobile artillery' to support the rapid advance of armored tanks, which conventional artillery might not be able to keep up with.

What was unique about the Luftwaffe's approach to CAS compared to its counterparts?

As a continental power focused on offensive operations, Germany uniquely recognized the need for aerial support of ground operations. While the Luftwaffe, like other air forces, focused on strategic bombing, it was distinct in its willingness to commit forces to Close Air Support, partly due to being forbidden from developing powerful strategic bombing capabilities by the Treaty of Versailles.

How did Germany's exposure to dive-bombing influence its CAS aircraft development?

Germany's exposure to dive-bombing during joint exercises with Sweden in 1934 demonstrated its greater accuracy and difficulty for anti-aircraft gunners to track. This led Ernst Udet, chief of Luftwaffe development, to procure close support dive bombers, resulting in aircraft like the Henschel Hs 123 and the famous Junkers Ju 87 Stuka.

Which famous dive bomber was developed by Germany for close support?

The famous Junkers Ju 87 Stuka was developed by Germany for close support, following their experience with dive-bombing. The source material shows an image of a flight of Ju 87 D-5s over the Eastern Front during the winter of 1943–44.

How did the Luftwaffe organize for air-ground coordination in WWII?

General Wolfram von Richthofen organized a limited number of air liaison detachments that were attached to ground units of the main effort. These detachments were responsible for passing requests from the ground to the air and receiving reconnaissance reports, though they were not trained to guide aircraft onto targets.

What was the psychological impact of Stuka attacks during the Meuse River crossing in 1940?

During the Meuse River crossing in the 1940 Invasion of France, Stuka attacks, aided by sirens attached to the aircraft, had a disproportionately powerful psychological impact on French defenders. Although few guns were directly hit, the attacks kept the French under cover and prevented them from manning their positions, contributing significantly to the German advance.

What methods did Germans use on the Eastern Front to coordinate CAS?

On the Eastern Front, the Germans devised visual ground signals to mark friendly units and to indicate the direction and distance to enemy emplacements, improving coordination for Close Air Support missions.

What factors led to the decline of German CAS after 1943?

The decline of German CAS after 1943 was caused by the growing strength of the Red Air Force, the redeployment of Luftwaffe assets to defend against American and British strategic bombardment, and a dwindling supply of aircraft and fuel, which collectively crippled their ability to provide effective CAS on the western front.

What challenges did the RAF face in providing CAS during the Battle of France in 1940?

During the Battle of France in 1940, the Royal Air Force was woefully unprepared to provide CAS. Its headquarters were located separately from Army headquarters in France, leading to unreliable communications, and after the RAF's withdrawal, Army officers had to make long-distance calls to London to arrange air support.

What was the significance of the Wann-Woodall Report for RAF CAS doctrine?

The Wann-Woodall Report, issued in August 1940 by Group Captain A. H. Wann and Colonel J.D. Woodall, recommended the creation of distinct tactical air force liaison officers, colloquially known as 'tentacles,' to accompany Army divisions and brigades. This report spurred the RAF to establish an Army Cooperation Command and develop procedures for placing an Air Liaison Officer with each brigade.

How did RAF commanders in North Africa improvise CAS coordination techniques?

In October 1941, Sir Arthur Tedder and Arthur Coningham, senior RAF commanders in North Africa, improvised CAS coordination by creating joint RAF-Army Air Support Control staffs at each corps and armored division headquarters. They also established a Forward Air Support Link at each brigade to quickly forward air support requests, which, once trained tentacle teams arrived in 1942, cut response time to thirty minutes.

Describe the 'cab rank' strategy developed by the British in North Africa.

The 'cab rank' strategy, developed by the British in North Africa, involved a system of three aircraft. One aircraft would be actively attacking, another would be in flight to the battle area, and a third would be at its base being refueled and rearmed. Ground control would direct the aircraft by radio, ensuring continuous air support, and if an attack failed, the next aircraft in the 'cab rank' would continue the assault.

Where was forward air control (FAC) first used to guide CAS aircraft?

The use of forward air control (FAC) to guide close air support aircraft, ensuring attacks hit intended targets and not friendly troops, was first implemented by the British Desert Air Force in North Africa. The USAAF later adopted this technique during operations in Salerno.

What was the 'Rover' system implemented by the British during the Italian Campaign?

The British 'Rover' system, introduced during the Italian Campaign, involved pairings of air controllers and army liaison officers at the front who could seamlessly switch communications between brigades. Incoming strike aircraft had pre-briefed targets but could be redirected by Rovers to more pressing targets, using artillery smoke shells, map grid coordinates, or terrain descriptions for guidance.

What was the initial doctrinal priority of the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) at the start of WWII?

At the start of World War II, the principal mission and doctrine of the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) was strategic bombing, based on the belief that unescorted bombers could win the war without significant ground troop involvement.

What issues plagued USAAF CAS efforts during the North African Campaign?

During the North African Campaign, USAAF CAS was poorly executed due to its doctrinal priorities focusing on strategic bombing, leading to few aerial assets being assigned to U.S. troops. The situation was further complicated in 1943 when the USAAF changed its radio frequencies to be incompatible with ground radios, hindering communication and coordination.

How did the USAAF and British forces improve CAS coordination during the Italian Campaign?

During the Italian Campaign, American and British forces improved CAS coordination by exchanging techniques and ideas. The AAF's XII Air Support Command and the Fifth U.S. Army shared headquarters, met nightly to plan strikes, and developed a network of liaisons and radios for communication.

What measure was taken to prevent friendly fire incidents during the planned invasion of France in 1944?

To prevent friendly fire incidents during the planned invasion of France in 1944, black and white 'invasion stripes' were painted on all Allied aircraft. This distinctive marking helped ground troops and other aircraft quickly identify friendly forces.

What innovations did General Elwood Quesada introduce for CAS under IX Tactical Air Command in 1944?

In 1944, General Elwood Quesada, commander of IX Tactical Air Command, introduced several innovations for CAS. These included the 'armored column cover' to provide continuous fighter-bomber availability for tank advances, using modified antiaircraft radar to track and redirect friendly attack aircraft, assigning fighter pilots to tours as forward air controllers, and providing VHF aircraft radios to tank crews for direct communication with overhead fighter-bombers.

How did XIX Tactical Air Command support General Patton's Third Army?

XIX Tactical Air Command, under General Otto P. Weyland, provided close air support to General Patton's Third Army through tactics like armed reconnaissance, which was crucial for guarding Patton's exposed southern flank during his rapid advance across France. Patton credited this close air support as a key factor in his army's swift success.

How did the American Navy and Marine Corps utilize CAS in the Pacific theater?

The American Navy and Marine Corps utilized CAS in the Pacific theater as a complement to or substitute for artillery and naval gunfire. Aircraft such as F6F Hellcats and F4U Corsairs used bombs, rockets, and napalm to dislodge or attack Japanese troops, particularly those entrenched in cave complexes during the latter part of World War II. The source material displays an image of a U.S. Navy aircraft conducting a strafing run against Japanese positions during the New Guinea campaign of the Pacific War in 1942.

When did the Soviet Red Air Force begin to recognize the importance of ground-support aircraft?

The Soviet Union's Red Air Force quickly recognized the value of ground-support aircraft, with Soviet aircraft already tasked with disrupting enemy ground operations as early as the Battles of Khalkhyn Gol in 1939.

Which purpose-built aircraft was highly effective for the Soviet Union in CAS during WWII?

The Ilyushin Il-2 Sturmovik, a purpose-built aircraft, proved highly effective for the Soviet Union in blunting the activity of German Panzers during World War II. It became the single most produced military aircraft in world history.

What famous quote by Joseph Stalin highlights the importance of the Ilyushin Il-2?

Joseph Stalin paid the Ilyushin Il-2 a great tribute, stating in a cable to a factory manager that 'They are as essential to the Red Army as air and bread,' emphasizing its critical importance to the Soviet war effort.

What radar-guided bomb release system was developed by Marine Captain Marian Cranford Dalby?

Marine Captain Marian Cranford Dalby developed the AN/MPQ-14, a system that enabled radar-guided bomb release at night or in poor weather, based on Navy experiments with the KGW-1 Loon (the Navy's designation for the German V-1 flying bomb).

What was the United States Air Force's initial stance on CAS during the Korean War?

During the Korean War, the newly created United States Air Force (USAF) initially moved away from CAS, prioritizing strategic bombers and jet interceptors, which led to insufficient battlefield support and coordination issues.

What critical assessment did Harold K. Johnson make regarding CAS effectiveness in the Korean War?

Harold K. Johnson, then commander of the 8th Cavalry Regiment, made a critical assessment of CAS effectiveness in the Korean War, stating, 'If you want it, you can't get it. If you can get it, it can't find you. If it can find you, it can't identify the target. If it can identify the target, it can't hit it. But if it does hit the target, it doesn't do a great deal of damage anyway.'

Why did General MacArthur exclude USAF aircraft from the Inchon Landing?

General MacArthur excluded USAF aircraft from the airspace over the Inchon Landing in September 1950, instead relying on Marine Aircraft Group 33 for CAS, likely due to the USAF's initial lack of focus and coordination issues with ground support during the Korean War.

What improvements did the USAF make to its CAS coordination efforts during the Korean War?

Despite a rocky start, the USAF worked to improve its CAS coordination efforts during the Korean War. This included requiring pilots to serve 80 days as forward air controllers (FACs) to understand ground difficulties and providing airborne FACs in critical locations. The Army also learned to assist by suppressing anti-aircraft fire before air strikes.

Close Air Support Wiki: Precision in the Skies: A Deep Dive into Close Air Support

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Overview

Integrated Aerial Warfare

Close Air Support (CAS) refers to aerial warfare actions, typically air-to-ground engagements such as strafing or airstrikes, executed by military aircraft against hostile targets in close proximity to friendly ground forces. As a critical form of fire support, CAS necessitates the meticulous integration of each air mission with the fire and movement plans of all involved forces. This detailed coordination, driven by the immediate proximity to friendly troops, is the defining characteristic of CAS operations.

Diverse Munitions

The arsenal employed in CAS missions is extensive and technologically advanced. It includes a variety of munitions such as aerial bombs, sophisticated glide bombs, precision-guided missiles, rockets, rapid-firing autocannons, and machine guns. In contemporary warfare, even cutting-edge directed-energy weapons, such as lasers, are being explored for their potential application in CAS scenarios. The selection of weaponry is tailored to the specific tactical requirements and the nature of the target.

CAS vs. Interdiction

While closely related to air interdiction, CAS is distinct. A subset of air interdiction, known as battlefield air interdiction (BAI), involves strikes against enemy units that have near-term effects on friendly forces but does not demand the same level of detailed integration with friendly troop movements. CAS, by contrast, requires exceptional coordination with ground elements, a task typically managed by specialized personnel such as artillery observers, Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTACs), and Forward Air Controllers (FACs).

History

Early Aviation & WWI

The origins of CAS can be traced back to World War I, the first conflict to extensively utilize aerial forces in a military capacity. Despite the nascent state of aviation and the limited destructive power of early aircraft, CAS operations, particularly trench strafing and light bombing, exerted a significant psychological impact on enemy troops. The Battle of Cambrai in 1917 marked a pivotal moment, demonstrating large-scale integration of air support. The British F.E.2b and Sopwith Camel, alongside German Hannover CL.II and the purpose-built Junkers J.I, were among the pioneering ground-attack aircraft. Effective coordination, though challenging with primitive radio communications, proved crucial, as evidenced in the Sinai and Palestine Campaign of 1918.

Interwar Developments

The interwar period saw further refinement of CAS doctrine, with theorists advocating for the adaptation of fighters and light bombers for this role. A notable divergence emerged between aviators, who championed airpower independence through strategic bombing and interdiction, and ground officers, who viewed CAS as essential "mobile artillery." Conflicts such as the Polish–Soviet War, Spanish Civil War, Iraqi Revolt of 1920, and the Chaco War provided practical testing grounds. The British Royal Air Force (RAF) effectively used airpower for colonial policing in the Middle East and North Africa, while the German Condor Legion developed influential CAS tactics during the Spanish Civil War. U.S. Marine Aviators experimented with dive bombing in the Banana Wars, laying groundwork for future tactics.

World War II Evolution

World War II solidified the universal acceptance of airpower's integration into combined arms warfare. The *Luftwaffe*, constrained by the Treaty of Versailles from developing extensive strategic bombing capabilities, uniquely committed forces to CAS, notably with the Junkers Ju 87 *Stuka* dive bomber, which used sirens for psychological effect. Despite initial challenges and interservice rivalries, German CAS tactics, including visual ground signals, proved superior early in the war. The RAF, initially unprepared, developed the "tentacle" system with Air Liaison Officers and the "cab rank" strategy in North Africa, where aircraft orbited awaiting tasking. The USAAF, initially focused on strategic bombing, gradually improved CAS coordination, particularly in the Italian Campaign and under General Elwood Quesada's IX Tactical Air Command, which introduced direct tank-to-aircraft communications. The Red Air Force, with its dedicated Ilyushin Il-2 *Sturmovik*, also demonstrated highly effective ground support.

Cold War & Modernization

The Cold War era, encompassing the Korean and Vietnam Wars, saw significant advancements in CAS. The U.S. Marine Corps maintained its strong tradition of air-ground cooperation. The newly formed USAF initially struggled with CAS coordination, prioritizing strategic bombing and jet interceptors, leading to critiques regarding effectiveness. However, improvements were made through mandatory FAC tours for pilots and the introduction of airborne FACs. The Vietnam War marked the widespread adoption of helicopter gunships and attack helicopters, which, despite being slower, offered superior battlefield persistence and terrain exploitation. The development of anti-tank guided missiles further enhanced their combat role. The debate over control of CAS assets continued, but the U.S. Army progressively gained more control over its rotary-wing assets. Post-Vietnam, the USAF introduced enlisted personnel for terminal attack control, allowing Air Liaison Officers to focus on liaison and advisory roles. NATO's AirLand Battle doctrine further integrated attack helicopters like the AH-64 Apache into combined arms operations.

Aircraft

Helicopters & Attack Aircraft

A diverse array of aircraft are utilized for Close Air Support. Military helicopters are frequently deployed for CAS, often being so intrinsically linked with ground operations that they are operated by army rather than air force units in many nations. Dedicated ground attack aircraft, such as the iconic A-10 Thunderbolt II (Warthog) and the Sukhoi Su-25 (Frogfoot), are purpose-built for CAS, employing rockets, missiles, bombs, and strafing runs to engage targets. Attack helicopters like the AH-64 Apache further exemplify this role, providing agile and precise fire support.

WWII & Cold War Platforms

During World War II, dive bombers like the German Junkers Ju 87 *Stuka* were renowned for their precision bombing capabilities, often enhanced with psychological sirens and anti-tank cannons. Allied forces primarily adapted fighters and fighter-bombers, such as the North American A-36 Apache (a P-51 Mustang variant), Hawker Typhoon, and P-47 Thunderbolt, for CAS roles, despite inherent compromises in design for low-altitude, ordnance-heavy missions. The Soviet Union notably deployed purpose-built ground attack aircraft like the Ilyushin Il-2 *Sturmovik* and the Polikarpov Po-2 biplane. In the Korean War, the Hawker Sea Fury, Vought F4U Corsair, and Douglas A-1 Skyraider continued the tradition of effective ground attack.

Modern Gunships & Bombers

The Vietnam War introduced specialized fixed and rotary-wing gunships, including cargo aircraft converted into formidable gun platforms. The Douglas AC-47 Spooky, followed by the Fairchild AC-119 and the Lockheed AC-130, demonstrated exceptional effectiveness in CAS and air interdiction. The AC-130, in particular, has seen continuous modernization and extensive service in conflicts like Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya. Modern CAS also leverages large, high-altitude bombers such as the B-1B Lancer, which, equipped with precision-guided munitions (GPS and laser-guided JDAMs), can deliver devastating tactical effects with extended loiter times and range, fundamentally altering doctrinal thinking.

Technology Integration

Contemporary CAS operations are heavily reliant on advanced information technology for precise direction and coordination. Technologies such as lasers, Global Positioning Systems (GPS), and battlefield data transfer are routinely employed to synchronize efforts across a wide array of air platforms. This technological integration enhances intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities, providing aerial-to-ground visual search, ground-convoy escort, and improved command and control (C2). These advancements are particularly vital in complex operational environments, including low-intensity conflicts, ensuring accurate targeting and minimizing collateral damage.

Doctrine

Foundational Principles

The effective execution of Close Air Support is underpinned by established military doctrines that guide its planning, coordination, and execution. These doctrines emphasize the critical need for detailed integration between air and ground forces, recognizing that the proximity of friendly troops to targets demands a high degree of precision and communication. The evolution of CAS doctrine reflects lessons learned from historical conflicts, adapting to new technologies and changing operational environments.

Key Publications

Official military publications provide the authoritative framework for CAS operations. For instance, the U.S. Marine Corps outlines its approach in MCWP 3-23.1, titled "CLOSE AIR SUPPORT," published in July 1998. Similarly, the Joint Chiefs of Staff provides comprehensive guidance in JP 3-09.3, "Close Air Support," last updated in November 2014. These documents detail the roles and responsibilities of air and ground personnel, communication protocols, and tactical procedures to ensure seamless and effective air-ground integration.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "Close Air Support" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about close_air_support while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

staff selection commission

annalen der physik

deformation physics

oxford university press

university of wisconsin press

history of the basques

References

Ian Gooderson, Air power at the Battlefront: Allied Close Air Support in Europe, 1943â45, p. 26

Barber 1946, Table 2.

Cooper, Tom. "Clandestine US Operations: Cuba, 1961, Bay of Pigs". 2007, (18 March 2014.)

A full list of references for this article are available at the Close air support Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not professional military or tactical advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for official military doctrine, training, or consultation with qualified defense professionals. Always refer to the latest official military publications and consult with experienced personnel for specific operational planning, tactical execution, or security considerations. Never disregard professional guidance because of information presented here.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.

Precision in the Skies

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

Overview 🎯

🤝 Integrated Aerial Warfare

💣 Diverse Munitions

↔️ CAS vs. Interdiction

History 📜

🕊️ Early Aviation & WWI

🌍 Interwar Developments

⚔️ World War II Evolution

🚁 Cold War & Modernization

Aircraft ✈️

🪖 Helicopters & Attack Aircraft

🛠️ WWII & Cold War Platforms

🚀 Modern Gunships & Bombers

📡 Technology Integration

Doctrine 📚

📖 Foundational Principles

📜 Key Publications

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

Overview

Integrated Aerial Warfare

Diverse Munitions

CAS vs. Interdiction

History

Early Aviation & WWI

Interwar Developments

World War II Evolution

Cold War & Modernization

Aircraft

Helicopters & Attack Aircraft

WWII & Cold War Platforms

Modern Gunships & Bombers

Technology Integration

Doctrine

Foundational Principles

Key Publications

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Disclaimer

Important Notice