This is an analytical overview based on the Wikipedia article concerning Scientology's practice of "Disconnection." Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

Severed Ties

A critical analysis of the practice of severing relationships within the framework of Scientology, exploring its historical context, policy, and societal impact.

Understanding the Policy ๐Ÿ‘‡ Historical Context ๐Ÿ“œ

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
๐ŸŽฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ŸŽฎ

The Policy of Disconnection

Defining Disconnection

Disconnection is a mandated practice within Scientology involving the severance of all ties with individuals deemed antagonistic to the organization or its tenets. This practice functions as a form of shunning, aimed at removing perceived obstacles to a Scientologist's spiritual advancement along the "Bridge to Total Freedom."[1][3] In certain documented instances, this has led to the dissolution of marriages and the estrangement of children from their parents.[2][4]

Suppressive Persons (SPs) and PTS

Individuals identified as antagonistic to Scientology are officially designated as "suppressive persons" (SPs) or "potential trouble sources" (PTSes). The Church teaches that association with such individuals impedes a member's spiritual progress.58206 L. Ron Hubbard's doctrine posits that association with SPs can render a Scientologist a PTS. To resolve this condition, a Scientologist must either "handle" the antagonistic person or, as a final measure, disconnect from them, thereby exercising their right to control communication.58206 Failure or refusal to disconnect from an SP is itself considered a suppressive act.58209

Policy Evolution and Denial

While the Church of Scientology has historically denied the existence of a formal disconnection policy,[7][8] its website acknowledged the practice by February 2012, framing it as a human right.[10] Legal arguments in the United States asserting disconnection as a protected religious practice were rejected, based on the finding that the pressure exerted on members renders the practice involuntary.[11] The policy, first formally articulated by Hubbard in 1965, underwent revisions, with attempts to discontinue it in 1968 under the "Code of Reform." However, evidence suggests the practice continued under different labels, particularly to mitigate negative public relations.[16]

Historical Manifestations

The 1960s

Early documented instances include disconnection letters sent to family members, such as one from Karen Henslow to her mother in 1966, which, despite a subsequent apology, highlighted the practice's impact. Court cases, like the one involving MP Geoffrey Johnson-Smith in 1970, presented evidence of families being alienated by Scientology's disciplinary measures.[22] New Zealand's Dumbleton-Powles Report also documented "Ethics Orders" mandating disconnection from individuals and their literature.[17]

The 1980s and 1990s

The policy's re-introduction was reportedly documented in internal Church memos around 1982. This period saw former executives like David Mayo being subjected to internal "writs of Disconnection."[16] Court judgments, such as Justice Latey's in 1984, acknowledged numerous proven examples of disconnection, including letters severing ties with fiancรฉs and business partners.[27] Media reports continued to surface, detailing cases of children disconnecting from parents and vice versa, often denied by Church spokespersons.[9]

The 21st Century

Contemporary accounts include investigative reports detailing Scientologists being ordered to disconnect from family members who voiced criticism online.[31] Public figures like Tory Christman and Jenna Miscavige Hill have spoken out about being shunned by former associates and family members after leaving the Church.[32][2] Similarly, Astra Woodcraft described being forbidden contact with her father, resorting to secret meetings.[33] Paul Haggis's resignation letter cited his wife being ordered to disconnect from her parents, causing significant distress.[7]

Scholarly Perspectives

Comparative Analysis

Religious scholars have commented on disconnection, with some drawing parallels to shunning practices in other new religious movements, such as the dis-fellowship practiced by Jehovah's Witnesses.[3] F. K. Flinn noted this commonality among emerging religions.

Concerns of Extremity

Other scholars, including J. Gordon Melton, have described disconnection as exceeding the policies of most contemporary religions, suggesting it is detrimental to all involved.[3] Newton Maloney of Fuller Theological Seminary also characterized the policy as excessively extreme.

Institutional Priorities

Stephen A. Kent highlighted that hostility towards critics, including family members, is deeply embedded in Scientology's ethical framework, where the Church's survival is paramount.[31] This perspective suggests that the practice serves the organizational imperative over personal relationships.

Cultural Resonance

Literary Depictions

Author William S. Burroughs, a former participant in Scientology, incorporated its jargon, including the term "Disconnect," into his fictional and non-fictional works during the late 1960s. His later public criticism of the organization marked his departure from its practices.[37]

Media Portrayals

The practice of disconnection has been a recurring theme in media portrayals of Scientology. Documentaries like "Scientology and Me" featured interviews with mothers whose daughters had disconnected, and shows like "Leah Remini: Scientology and the Aftermath" have brought widespread attention to the personal impact of these policies.[4][36] Films such as "The Master" and "Going Clear" have also explored related themes of control and alienation.

Related Concepts

Further Exploration

Understanding disconnection within Scientology often involves examining related concepts and practices:

Legal and Ethical Dimensions

The practice has been central to numerous legal cases and ethical debates concerning religious freedom, coercion, and the impact on family structures. Examining government reports and court findings provides critical context.

References

Test Your Understanding

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Disconnection Scientology" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about disconnection_scientology while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

                                        

References

References

  1.  "What is Disconnection" explanation by Church of Scientology
  2.  California appellate court, 2nd district, 7th division, Wollersheim v. Church of Scientology of California, Civ. No. B023193 Cal. Super. (1986)
  3.  Church of Scientology What is Disconnection? (archive.org copy of website Retrieved on 2008-05-16)
  4.  Judgement of Mr Justice Latey, Re: B & G (Minors) (Custody) Delivered in the High Court (Family Division), London, 23 July 1984
A full list of references for this article are available at the Disconnection (Scientology) Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Academic Disclaimer

Important Notice

This content has been generated by an AI, drawing upon publicly available data from Wikipedia. It is presented for academic and informational purposes to facilitate a deeper understanding of Scientology's "Disconnection" policy. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy and adherence to the source material, this presentation does not constitute an endorsement or validation of the practices described.

This is not a substitute for professional analysis or legal counsel. The information provided herein should not be considered definitive or exhaustive. Readers are encouraged to consult primary sources and conduct their own critical research. The creators of this page are not liable for any interpretations or actions taken based on the information presented.