This is a visual explainer based on the Wikipedia article on the Encyclopédie. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

The Enlightenment's Cornerstone

A comprehensive exploration of the seminal French Encyclopédie, a monumental work of the Age of Reason that aimed to disseminate knowledge and challenge established thought.

Discover the Origins 👇 Explore its Impact 🌍

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Origins

From Translation to Revolution

The Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, commonly known as the Encyclopédie, began as a French translation of Ephraim Chambers's English Cyclopaedia (1728). However, under the editorial leadership of Denis Diderot and, initially, Jean le Rond d'Alembert, it evolved into a far more ambitious project.

Editorial Vision

Diderot envisioned the Encyclopédie not merely as a compilation of existing knowledge but as a tool to "change the way people think" and to democratize knowledge. This ambitious goal aimed to empower individuals by providing them with access to a vast repository of information, challenging traditional authorities and fostering critical inquiry.

Collaborative Endeavor

The project faced numerous challenges, including financial difficulties and editorial disputes. Initially conceived by publisher André Le Breton, the editorial reins passed through several hands before Diderot and D'Alembert took charge. They assembled a diverse group of contributors, known as the Encyclopédistes, to create a comprehensive and authoritative work.

Publication Journey

The Monumental Work

The Encyclopédie comprised 28 volumes of text and 11 volumes of illustrations, featuring approximately 71,818 articles and 2,784 plates. The initial print run of 4,225 copies was substantial for the era, reflecting the project's significant investment and anticipated demand.

Controversy and Censorship

The Encyclopédie was a lightning rod for controversy due to its critical examination of religious and political institutions. It faced royal censors, temporary suspensions, and accusations of promoting irreligion and rebellion. To circumvent official interference, publishers resorted to manipulating publication details, such as listing Neuchâtel as the place of publication for later volumes.

Wider Dissemination

Beyond the initial French edition, the Encyclopédie inspired various other editions and translations across Europe. Smaller formats and revised editions were produced to make the work more accessible to a broader audience, extending its reach and influence throughout the continent.

The Encyclopédistes

A Collective of Minds

Over 140 individuals contributed to the Encyclopédie, representing a diverse array of intellectuals, scientists, artists, and artisans. Prominent figures of the French Enlightenment, including Voltaire, Rousseau, and Montesquieu, lent their expertise, alongside Diderot himself.

Louis de Jaucourt

The most prolific contributor was Louis de Jaucourt, a nobleman and physician, who penned an estimated 17,266 articles—approximately 25% of the total content. His immense contribution, often written at a rapid pace, significantly shaped the Encyclopédie's breadth and depth.

Diverse Expertise

Contributors were selected for their specialized knowledge, covering fields from natural history and mathematics to mechanical arts and philosophy. While many were compensated, the group was not monolithic; they often pursued their own intellectual interests, leading to a rich, sometimes contradictory, tapestry of ideas within the work.

Content and Structure

Taxonomy of Knowledge

D'Alembert's "Preliminary Discourse" outlined a systematic classification of human knowledge, inspired by Francis Bacon. This structure, organized into Memory (History), Reason (Philosophy), and Imagination (Poetry), aimed to provide a framework for understanding the interconnectedness of disciplines, emphasizing human reason as the ultimate arbiter of knowledge.

The Power of Cross-References

The Encyclopédie extensively utilized cross-references, a precursor to modern hyperlinks, to connect related articles. While intended to enhance coherence, these references sometimes served subtle satirical purposes, critiquing established norms or authorities, though the extent of this practice remains debated among scholars.

The Encyclopédie covered a vast range of subjects, with a particular emphasis on the mechanical arts and sciences, reflecting the burgeoning industrial age. Articles varied greatly in length, from brief definitions to extensive treatises on topics like glassmaking, silk production, and political economy. The work also engaged with contemporary debates on religion, politics, and society, advocating for principles of reason, natural rights, and laissez-faire economics.

Philosophical Underpinnings

The Encyclopédie championed Enlightenment ideals, promoting human reason, secularism, and critical inquiry. It challenged divine right theories, advocated for social contracts, and explored concepts of natural rights. While some contributors maintained orthodox views, others subtly or overtly critiqued religious dogma and societal structures.

Enduring Influence

Shaping the Modern World

By 1789, approximately 25,000 sets of the Encyclopédie had been sold across Europe, significantly impacting intellectual discourse. It is credited with popularizing the term "encyclopedia" and establishing a new standard for comprehensive knowledge compilation.

Catalyst for Change

The Encyclopédie is widely regarded as a key factor in the intellectual climate that led to the French Revolution. By disseminating Enlightenment ideas about reason, liberty, and equality, it helped to galvanize demands for social and political reform, challenging the established order.

A Precursor to Wikipedia

Modern scholars draw parallels between the Encyclopédie and Wikipedia, noting their shared characteristics as collaborative, technology-driven projects aimed at organizing and disseminating knowledge to a broad audience. Both works represent significant milestones in the accessibility and evolution of information.

Key Statistics

Scale of the Project

The Encyclopédie was a massive undertaking, comprising:

  • Volumes: 28 (17 text, 11 plates)
  • Articles: Approximately 71,818
  • Illustrations: 2,784 plates
  • Pages: Roughly 18,000
  • Words: Estimated 20 million

Economic Impact

The project represented a significant financial investment and return for its publishers. The substantial print run and widespread sales generated considerable profits, underscoring the economic viability and demand for such ambitious intellectual endeavors in the 18th century.

Voices of the Enlightenment

Diderot on Reason

"Reason is to the philosopher what grace is to the Christian... Other men walk in darkness; the philosopher, who has the same passions, acts only after reflection; he walks through the night, but it is preceded by a torch. The philosopher forms his principles on an infinity of particular observations. He does not confuse truth with plausibility; he takes for truth what is true, for forgery what is false, for doubtful what is doubtful, and probable what is probable. The philosophical spirit is thus a spirit of observation and accuracy."

Diderot on Wealth Distribution

"If exclusive privileges were not granted, and if the financial system would not tend to concentrate wealth, there would be few great fortunes and no quick wealth. When the means of growing rich is divided between a greater number of citizens, wealth will also be more evenly distributed; extreme poverty and extreme wealth would be also rare."

Related Concepts

Democratization of Knowledge

The Encyclopédie stands as a prime historical example of the democratization of knowledge. By compiling and disseminating information widely, it aimed to empower the public, fostering a more informed citizenry and challenging the traditional monopolies on knowledge held by religious and political elites.

Further Exploration

Scholarly Resources

The Encyclopédie has been the subject of extensive scholarly research. Works by historians such as Robert Darnton, Raymond Birn, and Jeff Loveland offer deep insights into its publication history, editorial challenges, intellectual impact, and its role in the broader context of the Enlightenment.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Encyclop U00e9die" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about encyclop_u00e9die while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

References

References

  1.  Précis de la vie du citoyen Lambert, Bibliothèque nationale, Ln. 11217, as noted in Shackleton, 130.
  2.  Review in: Mémoires pour l'histoire des sciences et des beaux arts, May 1745, 934–38.
  3.  Encyclopaedia Britannica, eleventh edition, vol. 9 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911), 376.
A full list of references for this article are available at the Encyclopédie Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not professional advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional historical, philosophical, or academic consultation. Always refer to primary sources and consult with qualified experts for specific research needs. Never disregard professional advice because of something you have read on this website.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.