The Alinsky Thesis
An analytical exploration of Hillary Rodham's 1969 Wellesley College senior thesis on Saul Alinsky, examining its content, academic reception, and subsequent public interest.
Explore the Thesis 👇 Understand the Controversy 🔒Dive in with Flashcard Learning!
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮
The Thesis: An Academic Endeavor
Foundational Work
In 1969, Hillary Rodham, then a student at Wellesley College, authored a 92-page senior thesis titled "There Is Only the Fight... : An Analysis of the Alinsky Model." This academic work delved into the philosophy and methodologies of community organizer Saul Alinsky.
Context and Subject
The thesis focused on Saul Alinsky, a prominent figure in American community organizing. Rodham's research involved direct engagement, including interviews with Alinsky himself and observational visits to low-income areas in Chicago to study Community Action Programs.
Academic Merit
The thesis was met with significant academic approval, receiving praise from all four of its reviewers. Rodham, recognized as an honors student, was awarded an 'A' grade for her comprehensive analysis.
Research and Methodology
Direct Engagement
Rodham's research methodology was characterized by direct interaction. She conducted interviews with Saul Alinsky, gaining firsthand insights into his perspectives and strategies. This personal engagement provided a unique foundation for her analysis.
Field Observation
Beyond interviews, Rodham undertook observational visits to Chicago's low-income neighborhoods. Her focus was on understanding the practical application and impact of Community Action Programs, offering a grounded perspective on Alinsky's theories in practice.
Academic Guidance
The thesis was guided by Professor Alan Schechter, a political science faculty member at Wellesley College. His mentorship was instrumental in shaping Rodham's academic exploration of Alinsky's model.
Core Analysis and Critique
Sympathy and Disagreement
Rodham's thesis demonstrated a nuanced perspective. While she found Alinsky's critiques of government antipoverty programs compelling and his personality appealing, she ultimately criticized his methods as largely ineffective. She noted that his approach of "social catharsis" could become an end in itself.
Theoretical Framework
The thesis sought to contextualize Alinsky within a lineage of American social activists, including figures like Eugene V. Debs and Martin Luther King Jr. However, it concluded that Alinsky's power/conflict model was rendered inapplicable by existing social conflicts and that its national expansion was hindered by the "anachronistic nature of small autonomous conflict."
Polarization and Systemic Change
Rodham expressed concern that Alinsky's emphasis on conflict could exacerbate societal polarization. She articulated a belief in the possibility of change from within the system, contrasting with Alinsky's more confrontational approach. Her analysis suggested society was in a transitional phase between conflict and consensus.
Academic Reception and Public Interest
Scholarly Acclaim
The thesis garnered significant academic praise, receiving an 'A' grade and positive reviews from all four evaluators. This underscored the quality and thoroughness of Rodham's research and analysis during her undergraduate studies.
Media Scrutiny and Speculation
Following Hillary Rodham Clinton's entry into the White House, the thesis attracted considerable media attention. Speculation arose among political opponents and researchers regarding its contents, with some suggesting it revealed radical or socialist leanings.
Enduring Allure
Years after its initial creation, the thesis continued to be a subject of interest. Columnists like Peggy Noonan referred to it as a "Rosetta Stone" for understanding Clinton's political evolution, highlighting its perceived significance in defining her approach to political culture.
Access Restrictions and Controversy
White House Request
In early 1993, the White House requested that Wellesley College limit access to the thesis. In response, the college instituted a policy restricting the release of theses by sitting presidents or First Ladies, a rule that effectively applied only to Rodham at the time.
Political Implications
The restricted access fueled political speculation, with critics suggesting the thesis contained politically explosive material. Biographers and columnists like David Brock and Barbara Olson noted the intense interest and the perceived desire to conceal its contents, implying it might reveal radical beliefs.
Media Investigations
Journalists such as Jack Anderson and Jan Moller were rebuffed in their attempts to access the document. Reports suggested the thesis criticized Lyndon B. Johnson's "War on Poverty" programs, claiming Rodham concluded that community-based programs were ineffective.
Dedman's Assessment
Reporter Bill Dedman, after reviewing the thesis and interviewing Rodham's advisor, described the White House's decision to seal the document as a "stupid political decision." He found that the thesis itself did not reveal extensive personal views but was rather a nuanced academic analysis.
Enduring Significance
Unlocking Understanding
The thesis became a focal point for understanding Hillary Rodham Clinton's intellectual development and political philosophy. Its perceived importance led to extensive media coverage and analysis, attempting to connect its content to her later political career.
Connection to Political Discourse
Interest in the thesis resurfaced during the 2008 Democratic presidential primaries, particularly in relation to Barack Obama's background as a community organizer. The thesis was seen by some as a key to understanding the broader landscape of community organizing and its influence on political figures.
Availability and Continued Study
Following the Clintons' departure from the White House in 2001, the thesis was made available through Wellesley College archives and interlibrary loan. This allowed for broader academic and public access, facilitating continued study and discussion of its contents and implications.
References
Source Citations
- ^ a b Kruse, Michael (August 26, 2016). "The First Time Hillary Clinton Was President". Politico Magazine. Retrieved 18 October 2016.
- ^ Carl Bernstein, A Woman in Charge: The Life of Hillary Rodham Clinton. Knopf, 2007, ISBN 0-375-40766-9, p. 57.
- ^ a b c Bill Dedman, "How the Clintons wrapped up Hillary's thesis: 'A stupid political decision,' says her former Wellesley poli-sci professor", msnbc.com, March 2, 2007. Accessed September 25, 2018.
- ^ a b c d e f g Bill Dedman, "Reading Hillary Rodham's hidden thesis: Clinton White House asked Wellesley College to close off access", msnbc.com, March 2, 2007. Accessed September 25, 2018.
- ^ Leibovich, Mark (2007-09-05). "In Turmoil of '68, Clinton Found a New Voice". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2016-07-20.
- ^ a b c d Peter Slevin, "For Clinton and Obama, a Common Ideological Touchstone", The Washington Post, March 25, 2007. Accessed August 10, 2015.
- ^ Donnie Radcliffe, Hillary Rodham Clinton : A First Lady for Our Time. Warner Books, 1993, ISBN 0-446-51766-6, p. 77.
- ^ David Brock, The Seduction of Hillary Rodham. Free Press, 1996, ISBN 0-684-83451-0, p. 17.
- ^ a b Michael Levenson, "A student's words, a candidate's struggle", The Boston Globe, March 4, 2007. Accessed July 14, 2007.
- ^ Jeff Gerth and Don Van Natta, Jr., Her Way: The Hopes and Ambitions of Hillary Rodham Clinton. Little, Brown and Co., 2007, ISBN 0-316-01742-6, p. 33.
- ^ a b Jack Anderson and Jan Moller, "Hillary's College Thesis Off-limits", Washington Merry-Go-Round, United Features Syndicate, The Hour (Norwalk, Connecticut), March 9, 1999, page A12.
- ^ Barbara Olson, Hell to Pay: The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham Clinton. Regnery Publishing, 1999, ISBN 0-89526-197-9, pp. 45–46.
- ^ Watson, Pernell (9 May 2003). "Hillary Clinton's college paper available". Newspapers.com. Daily Press (Newport News, Virginia). Retrieved 25 August 2021.
- ^ a b "Hillary Clinton's thesis yanked from eBay bidding". Newspapers.com. The Atlanta Constitution. 14 Jun 2001. Retrieved 25 August 2021.
- ^ "Radical thoughts". Newspapers.com. The Boston Globe. 7 Jun 2001. Retrieved 25 August 2021.
- ^ a b "'69 thesis purported to be Sen. Clinton's". Newspapers.com. South Florida Sun Sentinel. 8 Jun 2001. Retrieved 25 August 2021.
- ^ Hillary Rodham Clinton, Living History. Simon & Schuster, 2003, ISBN 0-7432-2224-5, p. 38.
- ^ Peggy Noonan, "Eine KleineBiographie", The Wall Street Journal, June 23, 2005. Accessed March 3, 2007.
- ^ "Hillary's Wellesley Thesis Shows Want of An Enemy" Archived 2007-10-16 at the Wayback Machine, Human Events, March 9, 2007
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "Hillary Rodham Senior Thesis" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.
This is not professional advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for academic consultation, historical analysis, or political commentary. Always refer to primary sources and consult with qualified professionals for specific needs. Never disregard professional advice because of something you have read on this website.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.