Journeys of Humanity
A scholarly exploration into the multifaceted movements of people across the globe, from motivations to global impacts.
Explore Concepts 👇 View Statistics 📊Dive in with Flashcard Learning!
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮
Defining Migration
Movement and Settlement
Human migration fundamentally refers to the movement of individuals from one geographical location to another, with the explicit intention of establishing a new, permanent, or temporary residence. While often conceived as international, the predominant form of human migration globally is internal, occurring within the borders of a single nation. This mobility is frequently linked to an enhancement of human capital at both individual and household levels, and access to robust migration networks can facilitate subsequent moves. Indeed, some research posits migration as a direct pathway out of poverty, underscoring its transformative potential. Age also plays a significant role in both employment-driven and other forms of migration. Individuals may migrate autonomously, as family units, or as part of larger collective movements.
Categories of Movers
Migrants are broadly categorized based on their motivations and circumstances for relocation:
- Migrants: Individuals who change their country of residence for general reasons, such as seeking improved employment prospects or better healthcare. This is the most common and widely understood category.
- Refugees: Defined by the UNHCR as persons compelled to flee their home country due to violence or persecution, often stemming from armed conflict or governmental oppression. Refugees frequently relocate without formal documentation due to the urgency of their circumstances.
- Asylum Seekers: Individuals who unwillingly leave their country but not under immediate threats of war or death. Their motivations typically involve escaping unstable economic or political conditions, or high crime rates, in pursuit of a better quality of life.
It is important to distinguish these from nomadic movements, which are generally seasonal and lack the intent for permanent settlement, and temporary travel for tourism or pilgrimage.
Forms of Relocation
Historically and contemporarily, human migration manifests in four primary forms:
- Invasion: The forceful entry and occupation of territory.
- Conquest: The subjugation of a people or territory by military force.
- Colonization: The establishment of a colony in one territory by a political power from another territory.
- Emigration/Immigration: The act of leaving one's country to settle in another (emigration) and entering another country with the intent to settle there (immigration).
Individuals displaced by natural disasters or civil unrest within their own country are referred to as internally-displaced persons (IDPs), while those who cross international borders seeking protection are asylum seekers, potentially becoming refugees upon approval.
Global Patterns & Numbers
Tracking Global Mobility
Numerous organizations, including the World Bank and the International Organisation for Migration (IOM), meticulously track global migration patterns through various reports and databases. The United Nations Statistics Division also maintains a comprehensive database. Recent advancements in leveraging internet data for migration research promise a deeper understanding of both patterns and underlying motivations. Structurally, a significant portion of global migration occurs between developing countries (South-South migration) and between high-income countries (North-North migration). In 2013, 38% of all migrants moved between developing countries, while 23% moved between high-income OECD nations.
Demographics of Movement
A significant shift in migration patterns over the last half-century is the increasing proportion of women among migrants, now accounting for almost half of all international movers. While female migration has historically been viewed as associative, contemporary studies reveal complex and diverse motivations for women migrating independently or with their families. Beyond international movements, substantial internal migration occurs within countries, including seasonal migration (often linked to agriculture and tourism) and population shifts between urban and suburban areas (urbanization and suburbanization). However, global migration studies typically focus on international flows.
Key Destinations & Origins (2019)
Understanding the primary destinations and origins provides critical insight into global migration dynamics. As of 2019, the top ten immigration destinations were:
- United States
- Germany
- Saudi Arabia
- Russian Federation
- United Kingdom
- United Arab Emirates
- France
- Canada
- Australia
- Italy
In the same year, the top countries of origin for migrants included:
- India
- Mexico
- China
- Russian Federation
- Syrian Arab Republic
- Bangladesh
- Pakistan
- Philippines
- Afghanistan
- Indonesia
It is noteworthy that when considering migration as a percentage of a country's population, the top-ranked nations are often smaller countries, differing significantly from those listed by absolute numbers.
Major Migration Corridors (2013)
Migration corridors represent significant bilateral flows of people between countries. As of 2013, the top 15 corridors, each accounting for at least two million migrants, included:
- Mexico–United States
- Russian Federation–Ukraine
- Bangladesh–India
- Ukraine–Russian Federation
- Kazakhstan–Russian Federation
- China–United States
- Russian Federation–Kazakhstan
- Afghanistan–Pakistan
- Afghanistan–Iran
- China–Hong Kong
- India–United Arab Emirates
- West Bank and Gaza–Jordan
- India–United States
- India–Saudi Arabia
- Philippines–United States
These corridors highlight enduring historical, economic, and social ties between nations, often reflecting patterns of labor demand, family reunification, and geopolitical factors.
Economic Impacts
Global Economic Contributions
The overall impact of human migration on the global economy has been largely positive. In 2015, migrants, despite constituting only 3.3% of the world's population, contributed a substantial 9.4% to the global Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This highlights their disproportionately significant role in economic productivity. At a microeconomic level, businesses increasingly recognize the value of human mobility. A 2021 survey by the Boston Consulting Group revealed that 72% of over 850 executives across various countries and industries perceived migration as beneficial to their nations, with 45% viewing globally diverse workforces as a strategic advantage for innovation and growth. Some analyses, such as that by the Centre for Global Development, even suggest that a hypothetical scenario of completely open borders could add an astounding $78 trillion to the world's GDP.
The Power of Remittances
Remittances, which are funds transferred by migrant workers to their home countries, represent a critical component of the economies of many nations. These financial flows often provide essential support to families and can significantly bolster national economies. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 10 specifically targets reducing the transaction costs of migrant remittances to less than 3% by 2030, acknowledging their importance for development. Beyond direct financial contributions, migrants also enrich their host and home societies through substantial sociocultural and civic-political contributions, influencing areas such as cuisine, sports, music, art, and civic participation.
Voluntary Migration
The Choice to Move
Voluntary migration is characterized by an individual's initiative and free will, driven by a complex interplay of economic, political, and social factors. These factors can originate in the migrant's country of origin ("push factors") or in the prospective country of destination ("pull factors"). While the distinction between voluntary and involuntary migration can be nuanced and subjective, as motivations often overlap, voluntary migration typically involves a conscious decision to seek improved circumstances. For instance, governments may offer incentives for people to settle in specific regions, acting as a "push strategy" to encourage internal migration, such as Armenia's incentives for border village residents.
Push Factors: Reasons to Leave
Push factors are the unfavorable conditions or circumstances in a person's home area that compel them to consider emigration. These negative aspects are often decisive in the decision to move. Examples include:
- Insufficient employment opportunities
- Limited prospects for advancement
- Mandatory conscription into the military
- Famine or prolonged drought
- Political persecution or fear thereof
- Inadequate medical care
- Significant loss of wealth
- Devastating natural disasters
- Threats to personal safety or life
- Desire for greater political or religious freedoms
- Environmental pollution
- Substandard housing conditions
- Experiences of discrimination
- Poor prospects for marriage or family formation
- War or the imminent threat of invasion
- Prevalence of disease
Such conditions can lead individuals to migrate to prevent financial hardship or emotional and physical suffering.
Pull Factors: Reasons to Attract
Conversely, pull factors are the attractive qualities or opportunities in a different country or region that draw individuals to emigrate there, often in pursuit of a better life. These positive aspects include:
- Abundant job opportunities
- Superior living conditions
- Perceived greater political or religious freedom
- Opportunities for personal enjoyment and cultural enrichment
- Access to higher quality education
- Improved medical care facilities
- Desirable climates
- Enhanced personal and communal security
- Stronger family links or established social networks
- Thriving industrial sectors
- Better prospects for marriage or family formation
Both push and pull factors, though seemingly opposite, are equally crucial in shaping migration decisions, acting as two sides of the same coin in the migration process.
Forced Migration
Unwilling Displacement
Forced migration, while subject to ongoing definitional debates, is generally understood as the movement of people who have been compelled to leave their homes due to circumstances beyond their control. The editors of the Forced Migration Review define it to include refugees and internally displaced people (IDPs) fleeing conflict, as well as those displaced by natural or environmental disasters, chemical or nuclear incidents, famine, or large-scale development projects. These diverse causes leave individuals with little choice but to seek new environments, often leading them to live in temporary camps, spontaneous settlements, or countries offering asylum.
Scale of Forced Displacement
The global scale of forced migration is substantial and has seen significant increases. By the end of 2018, an estimated 67.2 million people were forcibly displaced worldwide. This figure included 25.9 million refugees who had crossed international borders and 41.3 million internally displaced persons (IDPs) who remained within their own countries. Recent events underscore the dramatic nature of forced displacement; for example, in 2022, 6 million Ukrainian people fled their country, and 3 million Syrian people were displaced over a three-year period. Despite these large numbers, the proportion of migrants among the world population has remained relatively constant at approximately 3% over the last five decades, indicating that while forced migration is a critical issue, it represents a segment within the broader context of human mobility.
Transit Migration
Journeys in Between
Transit migration is a term that describes immigrants who are in the process of moving through one or more countries on their way to a final destination. This concept, first introduced by the UN in 1990, initially referred to migrants traveling through countries bordering Europe with the ultimate goal of reaching a European Union member state. Another prominent example includes Central Americans traversing Mexico to reach the United States. However, the term itself has generated considerable academic and institutional debate due to its complexities and potential biases.
Critiques of the Concept
Critics argue that "transit migration" is often a Eurocentric construct, used to shift responsibility for migrants onto non-EU states and pressure them to prevent onward migration to Europe. Scholars also point out that EU countries experience similar migrant flows, making it illogical or biased to apply the "transit" label exclusively to non-EU contexts. Furthermore, the term is criticized for oversimplifying the arduous and often perilous journeys undertaken by migrants. These journeys can span years and involve multiple stages, during which migrants frequently face various forms of violence and may not have a fixed end destination, necessitating constant adaptation of their plans.
Labor Migration Theories
Diverse Motivations
Numerous factors drive individuals to migrate for labor. Globalization, for instance, has amplified the demand for workers to sustain national economies, leading many economic migrants from developing countries to seek income abroad for survival. These migrants often send remittances back home, which are vital for many developing economies. Conflict, human rights violations, and violence also compel people to move, with millions classified as refugees by the UN Refugee agency. Other motivations include seeking better opportunities, access to services, or escaping extreme weather, often resulting in internal migration from rural to urban areas. Socio-cultural factors, such as the prestige associated with emigrating to Europe in North Africa, and historical ties to former colonial metropoles, where relatives may offer support, also play significant roles. The decision to migrate is also influenced by the relative skill premium between origin and host countries, determining migrant selectivity.
Neoclassical Economics
The Neoclassical Economic Theory of migration posits that the primary driver for labor migration is the disparity in wages between different geographic locations. These wage differentials are typically a function of the supply and demand for labor and capital. Regions with a scarcity of labor but an abundance of capital tend to have higher relative wages, while areas with a surplus of labor and limited capital offer lower wages. Consequently, labor is expected to flow from low-wage areas to high-wage areas. This movement often induces changes in both the sending and receiving countries. This theory is particularly effective in explaining transnational migration, as it often operates beyond the constraints of international immigration laws and governmental regulations.
Dual Labor Market
The Dual Labor Market Theory suggests that migration is primarily driven by "pull factors" in more developed countries. This theory posits that developed economies possess a bifurcated labor market: a primary market demanding highly skilled labor and a secondary market characterized by labor-intensive jobs requiring low-skilled workers. Migration from less developed to more developed countries, according to this theory, is a response to the demand for labor in the secondary market. Native workers often shun these low-mobility jobs, creating a vacuum that migrant workers fill. Furthermore, the initial scarcity of available labor can drive wages up in these sectors, making migration even more appealing to foreign workers.
New Economics of Labor
The New Economics of Labor Migration theory argues that migration patterns cannot be fully understood by focusing solely on individual workers' economic incentives. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of broader social entities, particularly the household. Migration, in this view, can be a strategy for risk aversion adopted by households facing insufficient income. Family members migrating abroad and sending remittances back home provide crucial capital, which can have wider economic benefits for the sending country. Recent research on the decline in US interstate migration suggests factors like reduced geographic specificity of occupations and improved access to information about other locations, while other studies highlight the role of location-specific housing in labor reallocation.
Relative Deprivation
Relative Deprivation Theory asserts that the awareness of income disparities within a migrant-sending community significantly influences migration decisions. The incentive to migrate is heightened in areas marked by high economic inequality. While remittances might initially exacerbate inequality, they can contribute to its reduction in the long run. This theory suggests a two-stage process for migrant workers: first, investing in human capital formation, and then capitalizing on these investments. Successful high-skilled emigrants can serve as aspirational figures for neighbors and potential migrants, motivating them to pursue similar paths to success, often leading to better schooling for children and improved housing for families.
World Systems
World Systems Theory offers a global perspective on migration, positing that interactions between different societies are a key driver of social change. For instance, trade policies that lead to economic decline in one country might create strong incentives for its population to migrate to countries with more robust economies. This theory suggests that even after decolonization, former colonies often retain economic dependencies on their former metropoles, influencing migration flows. However, the role of international trade is debated; some argue that free trade could reduce migration by increasing employment for unskilled workers in less developed countries and equalizing income conditions. Regardless, this theory helps explain migration between geographically distant nations.
Osmosis Theory
Osmosis Theory, drawing an analogy from the biophysical phenomenon of osmosis, studies the evolution of natural determinants of human migration. It categorizes migration into simple and complicated types. Simple migration involves diffusion, stabilization, and concentration periods, driven by natural determinants such as water availability, suitable climate, security, and population density. Complicated migration, conversely, is characterized by rapid evolution and the emergence of new sub-determinants like earning potential, unemployment rates, social networks, and migration policies. In this model, countries are likened to animal cells, borders to semipermeable membranes, and humans to water ions, with migration occurring from areas of lower "migration pressure" to those with higher pressure, measured by these determinants.
Historical Theories
Ravenstein's Laws of Migration
In the 1880s, Ernst Georg Ravenstein proposed a set of "laws" to describe human migration patterns, which became a foundational list in social science. These observations, though historical, offer enduring insights into the mechanics of population movement:
- Every migration flow tends to generate a counter-migration or return flow.
- The majority of migrants move relatively short distances.
- Migrants undertaking longer journeys typically choose large urban centers as their destinations.
- Urban residents generally exhibit lower migratory tendencies compared to those in rural areas.
- Families are less inclined to make international moves than young adults.
- Most migrants are adults.
- Large towns and cities primarily grow through migration rather than natural population increase.
- Migration often occurs in stages, known as "step migration."
- There are distinct differences in migration patterns between urban and rural populations.
- Technological advancements influence migration patterns.
- Economic conditions are a significant determinant of migration.
Lee's Push and Pull Factors
Demographer Everett S. Lee refined the understanding of migration by categorizing the factors influencing movement into two distinct groups: push factors and pull factors. Push factors are the undesirable aspects of an individual's home area that compel them to leave, while pull factors are the attractive qualities of a potential host area that draw them in. These factors are critical in shaping migration decisions.
Climate Cycles and Movement
The field of climate history suggests that historical waves of Eurasian nomadic movements were often rooted in climatic cycles. These cycles led to the expansion or contraction of vital pasturelands in Central Asia, particularly in Mongolia and the Altai Mountains. As resources shifted, tribes were displaced from their traditional territories by other groups seeking grazing lands, creating a "migratory domino effect." This phenomenon describes a chain reaction where one group's movement pushes another further south and west into regions like Anatolia, the Pannonian Plain, Mesopotamia, or southwards into the fertile plains of China, as seen in historical events like the Sea People invasion.
Food, Sex, and Security
A fundamental theory posits that human migration is driven by individuals' innate search for basic needs: food, sex, and security, beyond their immediate habitation. According to Idyorough (2008), towns and cities themselves are a product of this ongoing human endeavor. To secure food, ensure safety, and facilitate reproduction, humans are compelled to move and engage in cooperative or antagonistic social relationships. The development of tools and technology to interact with nature for food and security, coupled with improved cooperative relationships, further intensifies the push and pull factors that lead to migration and the concentration of populations in urban centers. Thus, the availability of social services in towns and cities is designed to meet these core human needs for survival and well-being.
Other Models of Mobility
Beyond the foundational theories, several other models contribute to our understanding of human mobility:
- Zipf's Inverse Distance Law (1956): Suggests that the volume of migration between two places is inversely proportional to the distance between them.
- Gravity Model of Migration: Analogous to Newton's law of gravity, it posits that migration between two places is directly proportional to their populations and inversely proportional to the distance between them, incorporating the "friction of distance."
- Radiation Law for Human Mobility: A more recent model that accounts for both short-distance and long-distance movements, often observed in digital data.
- Buffer Theory: Explores how intermediate locations can act as buffers or stepping stones in migration paths.
- Stouffer's Theory of Intervening Opportunities (1940): Argues that the number of people migrating a given distance is directly proportional to the number of opportunities at that distance and inversely proportional to the number of intervening opportunities.
- Zelinsky's Mobility Transition Model (1971): Links migration patterns to stages of demographic transition and societal development.
- Bauder's Regulation of Labor Markets (2006): Proposes that international labor migration is essential for the survival of industrialized economies, suggesting that migration regulates labor markets rather than merely being shaped by them.
Migration Governance
National vs. International
International migration and displacement are inherently transnational issues, impacting countries of origin, destination, and transit. Paradoxically, the governance of migration has historically remained largely within the purview of individual states, with policies and regulations primarily formulated at the national level. This is because migration directly influences fundamental aspects of state sovereignty, such as national identity, demographics, and economic stability. Comparative studies reveal a spectrum of openness to migrants across countries, influenced by policies concerning visa accessibility, employment prerequisites, and pathways to permanent residency.
Global Frameworks
Despite the national focus, bilateral and multilateral arrangements are crucial features of international migration governance. Several global treaties establish agreements on human rights and state responsibilities in specific areas. Notable examples include the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees (Refugee Convention), both widely ratified. However, other conventions, such as the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families, have not achieved broad acceptance among traditional destination countries. Over decades, numerous multilateral initiatives and dialogues have shaped migration discourse. The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, adopted by consensus in 2018, represents a significant milestone, offering the first internationally negotiated objectives for migration governance that balance migrants' rights with state sovereignty, though it is not legally binding.
Historical Programs
Colonialism and colonization profoundly shaped modern migration systems, establishing distant territories and their populations as destinations for movement and creating enduring ties. Early modern colonialism involved small groups of metropolitan conquerors ruling indigenous peoples. This was soon supplemented by forced migration through slavery or indentured servitude. Settler colonialism further entrenched the rule of colonizers by attracting metropolitan migrants with the promise of settlement, often leading to the displacement or elimination of indigenous populations. Only in the later stages of colonialism did migration flows begin to reverse, moving towards the metropole. Post-decolonization, migration ties between former colonies and their former metropoles have persisted. Today, independent countries implement selective foreign worker policies and programs, aiming to boost economies with skilled or inexpensive labor, though these policies often face opposition rooted in ethnic nationalism, leading to discrimination and exploitation.
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "Human Migration" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
- World Migration Report
- World Migration Report 2024, https://publications.iom.int/books/world-migration-report-2024
- McAuliffe, Kitimbo & Khadria, 2019, 'Reflections on migrations' contributions in an era of increasing disruption and disinformation', World Migration Report 2020, IOM: Geneva.
- Oiarzabal, P. J., & Reips, U.-D. (eds.) (2012). Migration and the Internet: Social networking and diasporas [Special issue]. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(9).
- For example, a permanent population and a defined territory, as per article 1 of the 1933 Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States.
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.
This is not legal, policy, or sociological advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional consultation in fields such as international law, public policy, demography, or sociology. Always refer to official government documentation, academic research, and consult with qualified professionals for specific inquiries or decisions related to human migration. Never disregard professional advice because of something you have read on this website.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.
Social-Scientific Theories 🤝
👥 Sociological Perspectives
Sociologists approach immigration by examining its intricate relationship with race, ethnicity, and social structure. Three principal sociological perspectives offer frameworks for understanding migration:
In the 21st century, the concept of transnationalism has gained prominence, allowing scholars to analyze the complex interplay between migrants, their countries of destination, and their countries of origin. Research on "social remittances" by Peggy Levitt and others has further illuminated how migrants influence socio-political processes in their homelands. Additionally, significant work is dedicated to understanding the integration of migrants into host societies.
🏛️ Political Science Insights
Political scientists contribute to migration studies by offering theoretical frameworks related to international security, citizenship, and international relations. The political significance of diasporas has emerged as a growing area of interest, with scholars investigating diaspora activism, state-diaspora relations, out-of-country voting mechanisms, and states' soft power strategies. Much of this work traditionally focused on immigration politics from the perspective of destination countries. However, research has expanded to include emigration processes, utilizing Albert Hirschman's "voice" vs. "exit" framework to explore how emigration impacts the political dynamics within countries of origin.