What is an injunction in legal terms?

An injunction is a special court order, considered an equitable remedy, that compels a party to either perform a specific action or refrain from performing certain actions. It is a powerful tool used by courts to enforce their directives, backed by the full coercive power of the court.

What is the historical origin of the injunction as a legal remedy?

The injunction was developed by the English courts of equity. Its roots can be traced back even further to Roman law, where a similar equitable remedy known as the "interdict" existed.

What are the potential consequences for a party that fails to comply with an injunction?

A party that disobeys an injunction can face severe penalties. These can include civil or criminal sanctions, such as monetary fines, imprisonment, or being held in contempt of court.

What is the fundamental rationale behind the equitable remedy of an injunction?

The primary rationale for an injunction is to provide a remedy when monetary damages alone are insufficient to rectify a wrong or protect a party's rights. It aims to make whole someone whose rights have been violated, often by preventing future harm or compelling specific actions.

What is the key legal principle that governs the granting of an injunction?

A fundamental principle is that an injunction can only be granted when there is "no adequate remedy at law." This means that monetary compensation must be insufficient to address the harm suffered by the plaintiff.

What types of considerations do courts take into account when deciding whether to grant an injunction?

When deciding whether to grant an injunction, courts consider the interests of the parties involved, including fairness and good faith. They also take into account the interests of non-parties, such as the public interest.

What are the two primary classifications of injunctions based on the action they mandate?

Injunctions are classified as either "mandatory injunctions," which require a party to perform a specific action (like cleaning up a spill), or "prohibitory injunctions," which forbid a party from taking certain actions (like using a trade secret).

Can an injunction include both mandatory and prohibitory elements?

Yes, many injunctions are structured to include both mandatory and prohibitory components. This means they can require a party to do certain things while simultaneously prohibiting them from doing others, providing a comprehensive directive.

How can injunctions be modified or dissolved after they are issued?

Injunctions are not necessarily permanent orders. They can be modified or dissolved by the court if circumstances change significantly over time, typically upon a proper motion filed by one of the parties.

How does an injunction differ from a declaratory judgment?

While both are non-monetary remedies, an injunction is distinguished by its ability to manage and direct the behavior of parties through court orders. A declaratory judgment, on the other hand, primarily determines the legal rights and obligations of the parties involved without necessarily commanding specific actions or inactions.

In New South Wales, Australia, what is an apprehended violence order (AVO)?

In New South Wales, Australia, an apprehended violence order (AVO) is a court order issued to protect a person who fears violence, harassment, abuse, or stalking. It is a form of injunctive relief designed to prevent harm.

What actions does an AVO typically prohibit in New South Wales?

An AVO generally prohibits the person against whom it is issued from assaulting, harassing, threatening, stalking, or intimidating the person seeking the order. It can also include restrictions on contacting the protected person or searching for them online.

What are interim injunctions in the context of Turkish law?

In Turkish law, interim injunctions are provisional forms of injunctive relief. They can be either mandatory, compelling a party to act, or prohibitory, preventing a party from acting, and are granted before a final judgment is reached.

What criteria must a plaintiff meet to obtain an interim injunction in Turkey?

To obtain an interim injunction in Turkey, a plaintiff must demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits of their case, show they are likely to suffer severe harm if the injunction is not granted, and prove that issuing the injunction is in the public interest.

How did federal courts in the United States historically use injunctions in relation to labor disputes?

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, federal courts frequently used injunctions to break strikes and disrupt union activities. This practice was often referred to as "government by injunction."

What was the significance of the In re Debs case in 1894?

The In re Debs case was significant because the U.S. government successfully used an injunction to outlaw the Pullman boycott. This ruling emboldened employers to seek federal court injunctions against various union strikes and organizing efforts.

What was the purpose and effect of the Norris-LaGuardia Act of 1932 in the United States?

The Norris-LaGuardia Act was passed by the U.S. Congress to limit the power of federal courts to issue injunctions in labor disputes. It imposed procedural and substantive restrictions, effectively prohibiting federal courts from issuing such injunctions in these cases.

What is a "structural injunction" in the United States legal context?

A structural injunction is a type of injunction where a court takes over the management and administration of an institution, such as a school, prison, or hospital, to ensure compliance with legal mandates, like desegregation orders.

What did the U.S. Supreme Court state in Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc. regarding injunctive relief?

In Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc. (1999), the Supreme Court ruled that the scope of federal injunctive relief is limited by the historical constraints on equitable remedies that existed in the English Court of Chancery around the year 1789.

What are the three main forms of injunctions commonly issued in the United States?

The three main forms of injunctions in the United States are temporary restraining orders (TROs), preliminary injunctions, and permanent injunctions. These are typically issued at different stages of legal proceedings.

What is a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and when can it be issued?

A Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) is a special type of injunction that can be issued before a trial begins. It may be granted without prior notice to the opposing party or a hearing, often to prevent immediate harm.

What is the typical duration of a TRO?

A TRO is granted only for a short period. Its purpose is to maintain the status quo until a court can schedule a hearing where the restrained party has the opportunity to contest the order.

What are the requirements for obtaining a preliminary injunction in the United States?

The requirements for a preliminary injunction are generally similar to those for a permanent injunction, with the crucial additional requirement that the party seeking the injunction must demonstrate a likelihood of succeeding on the merits of their case.

What is the four-factor test used by U.S. courts for granting a permanent injunction, as established in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C.?

The traditional four-factor test requires that: 1) the plaintiff has suffered irreparable injury; 2) remedies at law are inadequate to compensate for the injury; 3) considering the balance of hardships, an equitable remedy is warranted; and 4) the public interest would not be disserved by the injunction.

What is the "balance of hardships" inquiry in the context of permanent injunctions?

The "balance of hardships" inquiry, also known as the "undue hardship defense," involves the court weighing the potential difficulties or burdens faced by both the plaintiff and the defendant when deciding whether to grant an injunction.

What are "super-injunctions" in the context of English law?

Super-injunctions are injunctions issued in England and Wales where not only the details of the injunction but also its very existence and the facts or allegations it pertains to cannot be legally reported. They are designed to prevent disclosure of sensitive information.

How did the Trafigura super-injunction case in 2009 highlight issues with reporting restrictions?

The Trafigura super-injunction, obtained by Carter-Ruck solicitors, prohibited reporting on an internal report about a toxic waste dump scandal. Its existence was revealed only when it was mentioned in a parliamentary question, which is protected by parliamentary privilege and could be circulated online, circumventing the gag order.

Who is credited with coining the term "super-injunction"?

Roy Greenslade credits Alan Rusbridger, the former editor of The Guardian, with coining the term "super-injunction" in September 2009, following the Trafigura affair.

What is a "hyper-injunction"?

A hyper-injunction is similar to a super-injunction but includes an additional prohibition against discussing the injunction with members of Parliament, journalists, or lawyers. One known hyper-injunction prevented a party from discussing the breakdown of paint used in ship water tanks.

What are "dynamic injunctions" as defined by the European Commission?

Dynamic injunctions, as defined by the European Commission, are injunctions that can be applied to a website even if it changes its IP address or URL immediately after the injunction is issued. This avoids the need for a new court procedure each time the website reappears.

What is a "live blocking injunction" according to the European Commission?

A live blocking injunction, as described by the European Commission, is an injunction that allows for the repeated blocking of a website whenever a live broadcast is in progress. These are commonly used during live sporting events to prevent unauthorized streaming.

What is an "apprehended violence order" (AVO) in New South Wales, Australia?

An apprehended violence order (AVO) in New South Wales, Australia, is a court order designed to protect individuals who fear violence, harassment, abuse, or stalking. It functions similarly to a restraining order.

What are the historical origins of injunctions in English law?

Injunctions originated in the English courts of equity. Their development is linked to the need for remedies beyond monetary damages, with roots tracing back to Roman law's "interdict."

What is the significance of the "no adequate remedy at law" doctrine for injunctions?

The "no adequate remedy at law" doctrine is crucial because it establishes that an injunction, as an equitable remedy, should only be granted when monetary damages are insufficient to compensate for the harm suffered by the plaintiff.

How can injunctions be used to address past violations of the law?

While often used to prohibit future violations, injunctions can also be used to require a defendant to repair or rectify the consequences of past violations of the law.

What is the role of fairness and good faith in the granting of injunctions?

Courts give special attention to questions of fairness and good faith when deciding whether to grant an injunction and determining its scope. This principle is reflected in the availability of equitable defenses like laches and unclean hands.

What were the implications of the Brown v. Board of Education decision for the use of injunctions in the United States?

Following the Brown v. Board of Education decision, federal courts issued injunctions to enforce school desegregation across the United States. In some instances, courts even took over the management of public schools to ensure compliance.

What is the historical context of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc.?

This 1999 Supreme Court case addressed the scope of federal injunctive relief, stating that it is constrained by the limits on equitable remedies that were in place in the English Court of Chancery around the year 1789.

What legal argument was raised in a 2025 court filing by U.S. Justice Department officials concerning oral directives and injunctions?

In 2025, Justice Department officials argued that an oral directive from a judge is not enforceable as an injunction. This argument arose after the second Trump administration proceeded with deportation flights despite a federal judge verbally ordering them to be returned to the U.S.

What is the purpose of a "stay pending appeal" in relation to injunctions?

A stay pending appeal is a mechanism that allows a party who has lost a case in a lower court to delay the enforcement of an injunction while their appeal is being considered by a higher court.

What is the debate surrounding standard-essential patents (SEPs) and injunctions in antitrust law?

There is a debate among legal and economic scholars about whether patent holders should be able to seek injunctions against infringers of standard-essential patents (SEPs), especially when those patents are licensed on reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) terms. Some argue for antitrust liability for seeking such injunctions, while others believe existing patent law is sufficient.

What is the function of interim injunctions in the United Kingdom?

In the UK, interim injunctions, also known as interim orders, serve to provide temporary relief while a legal case is being heard. Their purpose is to prevent actions from being implemented that might later be found unlawful by a final court ruling.

What is the significance of parliamentary privilege concerning super-injunctions in the UK?

Parliamentary privilege in the UK protects statements made by Members of Parliament in Parliament from being considered contempt of court. This means that if a super-injunction is mentioned in Parliament, the details can become public knowledge through parliamentary records or subsequent reporting of those proceedings, even if the injunction itself attempted to prevent such disclosure.

What did Lord Neuberger's report reveal about the actual number of super-injunctions granted in the UK?

Lord Neuberger's report indicated that only two super-injunctions had been granted in England and Wales since January 2010, despite widespread media coverage and claims of many more existing. The report suggested that many "gagging orders" were being mislabeled as super-injunctions.

What is the difference between a super-injunction and a hyper-injunction?

A hyper-injunction is an extension of a super-injunction. While a super-injunction prevents the reporting of its existence and details, a hyper-injunction adds a further restriction, prohibiting discussion of the injunction with specific parties like MPs, journalists, or lawyers.

What is an "anti-suit injunction"?

An anti-suit injunction is a court order that restrains a party from commencing or continuing legal proceedings in another jurisdiction. It is used to prevent parallel litigation that could lead to conflicting judgments or abuse of process.

What is a "quia timet" action in law?

A quia timet action is a legal action brought to restrain a threatened wrongful act before it actually occurs. It is essentially a preemptive legal remedy sought when there is a clear apprehension of future harm.

What is the purpose of an "asset freezing" order, sometimes referred to as a Mareva injunction?

An asset freezing order, also known as a Mareva injunction, is a legal process that prevents a defendant from moving or disposing of their assets. Its purpose is to ensure that assets remain available to satisfy a potential judgment awarded to the plaintiff.

How can injunctions be enforced by courts?

Injunctions can be enforced through equitable enforcement mechanisms, most notably contempt of court proceedings. Failure to comply can lead to penalties such as fines or imprisonment.

What is the relationship between injunctions and the "clean hands" doctrine?

The "clean hands" doctrine is an equitable defense that can affect the granting of an injunction. It means that a party seeking equitable relief, such as an injunction, must not have engaged in any wrongdoing related to the matter at hand.

What is the role of "laches" as a defense against an injunction?

Laches is an equitable defense that can prevent a party from obtaining an injunction if they have unreasonably delayed in bringing their claim, and this delay has prejudiced the opposing party. It is based on the principle that "equity aids the vigilant, not those who slumber on their rights."

Injunction Wiki: Judicial Mandates: A Comprehensive Guide to Injunctions

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

What is an Injunction?

Definition and Nature

An injunction is a fundamental equitable remedy, manifesting as a specific court order that compels a party to either perform or refrain from performing certain actions.^a^[1]^[2] Originating from the English courts of equity, its roots trace back to Roman law's concept of the "interdict."

Coercive Power

When a court issues an injunction, it is employing its full coercive authority to direct a party's conduct.^[4] Failure to comply with such an order can lead to severe consequences, including criminal or civil penalties, monetary sanctions, and even imprisonment for contempt of court.

Legal vs. Equitable

While primarily an equitable remedy, injunctions can also function as legal remedies. This occurs when statutes or common-law courts adopt equitable principles, extending injunctive relief into the legal domain.^a

Rationale and Principles

When Money Isn't Enough

Injunctions are typically granted when monetary damages alone cannot adequately address the harm caused by a violation of rights. This principle is often summarized as the requirement that there must be "no adequate remedy at law."^[5]

Fairness and Good Faith

Courts consider principles of fairness and good faith when deciding whether to grant an injunction and defining its scope. This includes applying equitable defenses such as laches (unreasonable delay) and the doctrine of unclean hands (misconduct by the plaintiff).^[6]

Scope and Modification

Injunctions can prohibit future unlawful acts (e.g., trespass, patent infringement) or mandate the repair of past wrongs. They can be mandatory (requiring action) or prohibitory (forbidding action), often containing elements of both.^[7] Importantly, injunctions can be modified or dissolved if circumstances change, allowing courts to manage ongoing behavior.^[8]^[9]

Forms of Injunctions

Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs)

A TRO is a special injunction issued before trial, potentially without prior notice or a hearing to the opposing party. It is granted for a limited duration until a hearing can be held where the restrained party can contest the order. TROs are frequently used in cases involving domestic violence, stalking, or harassment.^[17]

Preliminary Injunctions

Issued before a full trial, preliminary injunctions are granted less frequently than TROs. They typically require the party seeking the injunction to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits, potential for severe harm without the injunction, and that the injunction serves the public interest.^[18]

Permanent Injunctions

Granted after a trial, permanent injunctions require a court to consider four factors: (1) the plaintiff has suffered irreparable injury; (2) legal remedies are inadequate; (3) equity warrants the remedy considering the balance of hardships; and (4) the public interest is not disserved.^[19]^[20]

Global Applications

Australia

In New South Wales, Apprehended Violence Orders (AVOs) function similarly to injunctions, prohibiting actions like assault, harassment, stalking, and intimidation, often including conditions against contact or online pursuit.^[11]^[12]

Turkey

Turkish law utilizes interim injunctions as extraordinary remedies, requiring courts to balance competing claims of injury and consider potential hardship to the defendant.^[13]^[13]^[14]

United Kingdom

The UK employs interim injunctions for relief pending trial. Notably, "super-injunctions" and "hyper-injunctions" have emerged, imposing strict secrecy orders that limit reporting or even discussion of the injunction's existence, though their use and definition have been subject to debate and scrutiny.^[27]^[28]^[29]

European Union

The EU recognizes "dynamic injunctions," which can adapt to new website addresses or IP changes without requiring a new judicial procedure, and "live blocking injunctions," used to halt illegal streaming during live events.^[39]

Antitrust Context

Patent Disputes and Competition

In antitrust law, particularly concerning standard-essential patents (SEPs), the pursuit of injunctions by patent holders is a subject of significant debate. While some argue that seeking injunctions for SEPs, which must be licensed on FRAND (Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory) terms, can lead to anti-competitive practices and harm consumers, others contend that patent law adequately addresses these issues without the need for antitrust intervention.^[23]^[24]^[25]^[26]^[26]

Related Concepts

Key Terms and Doctrines

Understanding injunctions often involves familiarity with related legal concepts and remedies:

Equitable Remedies: Non-monetary solutions provided by courts of equity.
Declaratory Judgment: A court ruling defining the rights and obligations of parties without ordering specific actions.
Laches & Unclean Hands: Equitable defenses that can prevent a party from obtaining an injunction.
Contempt of Court: Penalties for disobeying court orders.
Restraining Order: Often used interchangeably with injunctions, particularly in domestic contexts.

Further Exploration

The following concepts are closely linked to the study of injunctions:

Equity (law)
Court of Equity
Equitable Remedies
Declaratory Judgment
Restraining Order
Anti-suit Injunction

References

Source Citations

a An injunction is sometimes also available as a legal remedy, known as a "legal injunction" or "injunction at law." In that case, injunctive relief would have been extended to law either by statute or through common-law courts borrowing from equity.
^ Sharpe, Robert J. (2017). Injunctions and Specific Performance. Canada: Thomson Reuters Canada Limited. ISBN 9780779884001.
^ Perell, Paul (1989). "The Interlocutory Injunction and Irreparable Harm". Canadian Bar Review. 68: 538.
^ Titi, Catharine (2021). "The Function of Equity in International Law". OUP. p. 22.
^ Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 Archived 23 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine, 428 (2009) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
^ Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo, 456 U.S. 305, 311 (1982).
^ Bray, Samuel (2014). "A Little Bit of Laches Goes a Long Way: Notes on Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc". Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc. 67: 1. SSRN 2376080.
^ Dobbs, Dan (1993). Law of Remedies: Damages—Equity—Restitution (2nd ed.). St. Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing Co. p. 224. ISBN 0-314-00913-2.
^ International Union, United Mine Workers of America v. Bagwell, 512 U.S. 821 (1994).
^ Jost, Timothy Stoltzfus (1986). "From Swift to Stotts and Beyond: Modification of Injunctions in the Federal Courts". Texas Law Review. 64: 1101.
^ ^a ^b Bray, Samuel (2014). "The Myth of the Mild Declaratory Judgment". Duke Law Journal. 63: 1091. SSRN 2330050.
^ "New South Wales – Apprehended Violence Orders". National Council of Single Mothers and Their Children. Archived from the original on 11 February 2011. Retrieved 26 September 2010.
^ "Are you applying for an AVO?". Legal Aid New South Wales. Archived from the original on 22 October 2015. Retrieved 2 August 2016.
^ ^a ^b Zeldin, Wendy (30 December 2015). "Constitutional Court Rulings on "Reasonable Suspicion" in Criminal Procedure Code". Library of Congress. Retrieved 28 December 2020.
^ Baysal, Pelin (3 January 2019). "Litigation and enforcement in Turkey: overview". Westlaw. Retrieved 28 December 2020.
^ Wolfe, Jan (17 March 2025). "Trump Administration Defends Deportation Flights After Court Order". The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 17 March 2025. Retrieved 20 March 2025.
^ Jansen, Bart (18 March 2025). "Government lawyers argue oral orders not enforceable". USA Today. Retrieved 20 March 2025.
^ "Understanding Injunctions". Insights. American Bar Association. Winter 2014. Retrieved 6 September 2017.
^ "Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008)". Google Scholar. Retrieved 6 September 2017.
^ "eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388 (2006)". Google Scholar. Retrieved 6 September 2017.
^ "A.W. Chesterton Co., Inc. v. Chesterton, 128 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1997)". Google Scholar. Retrieved 6 September 2017.
^ Laycock, Douglas (2012). "The Neglected Defense of Undue Hardship (and the Doctrinal Train Wreck in Boomer v. Atlantic Cement)". Journal of Tort Law. 4 (3): 1. doi:10.1515/1932-9148.1123. S2CID 155015267. SSRN 2040896.
^ Press Release, U.S. Dep't of Justice, Statement of the Department of Justice Antitrust Division on Its Decision to Close Its Investigation of Samsung's Use of Its Standards-Essential Patents (7 Feb. 2014) [hereinafter DOJ Closes Its Samsung Investigation], available at https://www.justice.gov/atr/public/press_releases/2014/303547.pdf; Decision and Order § IV.D, Robert Bosch GmbH, No. C-4377 (F.T.C. 23 Apr. 2013). Archived 2014-04-07 at the Wayback Machine
^ J. Gregory Sidak, Injunctive Relief and the FRAND Commitment in the United States at 16, forthcoming in 1 Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law: Antitrust and Patents (Jorge L. Contreras ed., Cambridge Univ. Press 2017), https://www.criterioneconomics.com/injunctive-relief-and-the-frand-commitment-in-the-united-states.html.
^ Joseph Farrell, John Hayes, Carl Shapiro & Theresa Sullivan, Standard Setting, Patents, and Hold-Up, 74 ANTITRUST L.J. 603 (2007); Jorge L. Contreras, Fixing FRAND: A Pseudo-Pool Approach to Standards-Based Patent Licensing, 79 ANTITRUST L.J. 47 (2013).
^ J. Gregory Sidak, The Meaning of FRAND, Part II: Injunctions, 11 J. COMP L. & ECON 201 (2015), https://www.criterioneconomics.com/meaning-of-frand-injunctions-for-standard-essential-patents.html.
^ England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Willis Ltd & Anor v Jardine Lloyd Thompson Group Plc & Ors, 2015, EWCA Civ 450 (22 April 2015)
^ Press Gazette, 14 October 2009, MPs slam 'super injunction' which gagged Guardian Archived 16 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine
^ Robinson, James (13 October 2009). "How super-injunctions are used to gag investigative reporting". The Guardian. London.
^ "House of Commons Hansard Debates for 17 Mar 2011". Parliament of the United Kingdom. 17 March 2011.
^ "Trafigura drops bid to gag Guardian over MP's question", The Guardian, 13 October 2009.
^ Leigh, David (29 March 2011). "Superinjunction scores legal first for nameless financier in libel action". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 3 April 2011.
^ Greenslade, Roy (20 April 2011). "Law is badly in need of reform as celebrities hide secrets". Evening Standard. London. Archived from the original on 24 April 2011. Retrieved 30 April 2011.
^ Swinford, Steven (21 March 2011). "'Hyper-injunction' stops you talking to MP". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022.
^ Tim Dowling (21 March 2011). "Got secrets you want to keep? Get a hyper-injunction". The Guardian. London.
^ "Number crunching". Private Eye. 1288. Pressdram Ltd: 5. 2011.
^ "Media concession made in injunction report". BBC News. 20 May 2011. Retrieved 20 May 2011.
^ "A Philosophical Conundrum". Private Eye. 1393. Pressdram Ltd: 9. 2015.
^ ^a ^b "EUR-Lex - 52017DC0708 - EN - EUR-Lex". eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved 12 May 2021.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "Injunction" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about injunction while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

1991–92 cincinnati bearcats men's basketball team

british commonwealth occupation force

tailcoat

dual alliance 1879

silhouette

neighborhood electric vehicle

sovereign immunity

string quartet

baitul islam mosque

2008–09 denver nuggets season

References

A full list of references for this article are available at the Injunction Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Legal Notice

This page has been generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is derived from publicly available data and may not be exhaustive, fully accurate, or entirely up-to-date.

This is not legal advice. The information provided herein is not a substitute for professional legal consultation, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of a qualified legal professional with any questions you may have regarding a legal matter. Never disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking it because of information obtained from this website.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided.

Judicial Mandates

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

What is an Injunction? ⚖️

📜 Definition and Nature

🏛️ Coercive Power

⚖️ Legal vs. Equitable

Rationale and Principles 💡

❓ When Money Isn't Enough

🤝 Fairness and Good Faith

🔄 Scope and Modification

Forms of Injunctions 📜

⏳ Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs)

⚖️ Preliminary Injunctions

✅ Permanent Injunctions

Global Applications 🌍

🇦🇺 Australia

🇹🇷 Turkey

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

🇪🇺 European Union

Antitrust Context 📈

⚖️ Patent Disputes and Competition

Related Concepts 🔗

📚 Key Terms and Doctrines

📖 Further Exploration

References 📚

📜 Source Citations

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Legal Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

What is an Injunction?

Definition and Nature

Coercive Power

Legal vs. Equitable

Rationale and Principles

When Money Isn't Enough

Fairness and Good Faith

Scope and Modification

Forms of Injunctions

Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs)

Preliminary Injunctions

Permanent Injunctions

Global Applications

Australia

Turkey

United Kingdom

European Union

Antitrust Context

Patent Disputes and Competition

Related Concepts

Key Terms and Doctrines

Further Exploration

References

Source Citations

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Disclaimer

Important Legal Notice