What is the fundamental definition of an integer in mathematics?

An integer is defined as the number zero (0), a positive natural number (1, 2, 3, ...), or the negation of a positive natural number (–1, –2, –3, ...). Essentially, integers are whole numbers, including positive, negative, and zero, without any fractional or decimal components.

How are negative integers specifically referred to in the context of natural numbers?

The negations or additive inverses of the positive natural numbers are referred to as negative integers. For example, if 5 is a positive natural number, its additive inverse, -5, is a negative integer.

What symbol is commonly used to denote the set of all integers, and what is its origin?

The set of all integers is often denoted by the boldface Z or blackboard bold `ℤ`. This notation comes from the German word 'Zahlen', meaning 'numbers', and its use has been attributed to David Hilbert.

How does the set of integers relate to other fundamental sets of numbers, such as natural, rational, and real numbers?

The set of natural numbers (ℕ) is a subset of the set of integers (ℤ). In turn, the set of integers (ℤ) is a subset of the set of all rational numbers (ℚ), which itself is a subset of the real numbers (ℝ). This establishes a hierarchical relationship where integers are a foundational component of larger number systems.

Can you provide examples of numbers that are considered integers and those that are not, according to the text?

Examples of integers include 21, 4, 0, and -2048. Numbers that are not integers include 9.75, 5 1/2 (a mixed number), 5/4 (a fraction), and the square root of 2 (an irrational number), because they contain a fractional component or cannot be expressed as a whole number.

What basic algebraic structures do integers form in mathematics?

The integers form the smallest group and the smallest ring that contain the natural numbers. These are fundamental concepts in abstract algebra, describing sets with specific operations and properties.

In algebraic number theory, how are integers sometimes qualified, and why?

In algebraic number theory, integers are sometimes qualified as 'rational integers' to distinguish them from the more general 'algebraic integers'. Rational integers are specifically algebraic integers that are also rational numbers.

What is the etymological root of the word 'integer'?

The word 'integer' originates from the Latin word 'integer', which means 'whole' or, literally, 'untouched'. It is derived from 'in' (meaning 'not') and 'tangere' (meaning 'to touch').

How was the term 'integer' historically used before its modern definition?

Historically, the term 'integer' was used for a number that was a multiple of 1, or to refer to the whole part of a mixed number. Initially, only positive integers were considered, making the term synonymous with natural numbers.

When did the definition of 'integer' expand to include negative numbers?

The definition of integer expanded over time to include negative numbers as their usefulness became recognized. For instance, Leonhard Euler, in his 1765 work 'Elements of Algebra', explicitly defined integers to encompass both positive and negative numbers.

When did the phrase 'the set of the integers' begin to be used, and what mathematical concept influenced its adoption?

The phrase 'the set of the integers' was not used before the end of the 19th century, when Georg Cantor introduced the concepts of infinite sets and set theory, which provided a formal framework for discussing collections of numbers.

Who is credited with the use of the letter 'Z' to denote the set of integers, and when did it first appear in a textbook?

The use of the letter 'Z' to denote the set of integers is attributed to David Hilbert. The earliest known use of this notation in a textbook occurred in 'Algèbre', written by the collective Nicolas Bourbaki, dating to 1947.

How was the notation 'Z' for integers adopted in mathematics, and were there any alternative notations?

The notation 'Z' was not adopted immediately; for example, another textbook used the letter 'J', and a 1960 paper used 'Z' to denote non-negative integers. However, by 1961, 'Z' was generally used by modern algebra texts to denote both positive and negative integers.

What are some common annotations used with the symbol `ℤ` to specify different subsets of integers?

Various annotations are used with `ℤ` to denote specific subsets, though usage can vary among authors. Examples include `ℤ⁺`, `ℤ₊`, or `ℤ>` for positive integers; `ℤ⁰⁺` or `ℤ≥` for non-negative integers; and `ℤ≠` for non-zero integers. Some authors also use `ℤ*` for non-zero integers, or for the set {-1, 1}.

How is `ℤₚ` used in mathematics?

The symbol `ℤₚ` is used to denote either the set of integers modulo `p` (which are congruence classes of integers) or the set of `p`-adic integers. These are specialized mathematical constructs used in number theory and abstract algebra.

What was the historical meaning of 'whole numbers' before the 1950s, and how did it change?

Up until the early 1950s, 'whole numbers' was synonymous with 'integers'. In the late 1950s, as part of the New Math movement, American elementary school teachers began teaching that 'whole numbers' referred specifically to natural numbers (excluding negative numbers), while 'integer' included negative numbers. The term 'whole numbers' remains ambiguous to this day.

What unique property does the ring of integers possess in the context of ring theory?

The integers form a ring that is considered the most basic, or 'initial object', in the category of rings. This means that for any given ring, there exists a unique ring homomorphism from the integers into that ring, making it a foundational structure.

Under what condition is the unique homomorphism from the integers into another ring injective?

The unique homomorphism from the integers into another ring is injective if and only if the characteristic of the target ring is zero. This implies that any ring with characteristic zero will contain a subring that is isomorphic to the integers, which is its smallest subring.

Are integers closed under division or exponentiation? Provide examples.

Integers are not closed under division, as the quotient of two integers (e.g., 1 divided by 2) does not necessarily result in an integer. Similarly, they are not closed under exponentiation, because the result can be a fraction when the exponent is negative (e.g., 2 to the power of -1 is 1/2).

What properties of addition make the set of integers an abelian group?

Under addition, the set of integers satisfies closure (a+b is an integer), associativity (a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c), commutativity (a+b=b+a), existence of an identity element (a+0=a), and existence of inverse elements (a+(-a)=0). These five properties collectively define an abelian group.

Why is the set of integers under addition considered a cyclic group?

The set of integers under addition is a cyclic group because every non-zero integer can be generated by repeatedly adding 1 (e.g., 1+1+1 for 3) or -1 (e.g., (-1)+(-1)+(-1) for -3). In fact, it is the only infinite cyclic group, meaning any other infinite cyclic group is structurally identical to it.

What properties of multiplication for integers make the set of integers a commutative monoid?

Under multiplication, the set of integers satisfies closure (a × b is an integer), associativity (a × (b × c) = (a × b) × c), commutativity (a × b = b × a), and the existence of an identity element (a × 1 = a). These properties define a commutative monoid.

Why is the set of integers under multiplication not considered a group?

The set of integers under multiplication is not considered a group because not every integer has a multiplicative inverse within the set of integers. For example, the number 2 does not have an integer inverse (1/2 is not an integer). The only invertible integers (called units) are -1 and 1.

What overall algebraic structure do integers form when considering both addition and multiplication?

When considering both addition and multiplication, the integers form a commutative ring with unity. This means they satisfy all the properties listed for addition (abelian group) and multiplication (commutative monoid), along with distributivity of multiplication over addition.

What does the property of 'no zero divisors' in integers imply about their algebraic structure?

The lack of zero divisors in the integers (meaning if a × b = 0, then either a = 0 or b = 0 or both) implies that the commutative ring of integers (ℤ) is an integral domain. An integral domain is a non-zero commutative ring in which the product of any two non-zero elements is non-zero.

What is the smallest field that contains the integers as a subring?

The smallest field that contains the integers as a subring is the field of rational numbers (ℚ). A field is a set where addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division (except by zero) are all well-defined, which is not true for integers due to the lack of multiplicative inverses for most numbers.

How is division 'with remainder' defined for integers, and what is it called?

Division 'with remainder' for integers is called Euclidean division. Given two integers 'a' and 'b' (where 'b' is not zero), there exist unique integers 'q' (quotient) and 'r' (remainder) such that `a = q × b + r`, and `0 ≤ r < |b|`, where `|b|` is the absolute value of 'b'.

What is the Euclidean algorithm, and what does it compute?

The Euclidean algorithm is a method for computing the greatest common divisor (GCD) of two integers. It works by repeatedly applying Euclidean division, using the remainder from one step as the divisor in the next, until a remainder of zero is obtained.

What does it mean for the set of integers to be a Euclidean domain, and what is its significant implication?

The fact that Euclidean division is defined on integers means that ℤ is a Euclidean domain. This implies that ℤ is also a principal ideal domain, and, most importantly, that any positive integer can be written as the product of prime numbers in an essentially unique way. This unique factorization property is known as the fundamental theorem of arithmetic.

Describe the order-theoretic properties of the set of integers.

The set of integers (ℤ) is a totally ordered set, meaning any two integers can be compared (one is less than, greater than, or equal to the other). It has no upper or lower bound, extending infinitely in both positive and negative directions, represented as `... -3 < -2 < -1 < 0 < 1 < 2 < 3 ...`.

How are positive, negative, and zero integers defined based on their ordering?

An integer is defined as positive if it is greater than zero, and negative if it is less than zero. Zero itself is uniquely defined as being neither negative nor positive.

How is the ordering of integers compatible with algebraic operations?

The ordering of integers is compatible with algebraic operations in two key ways: 1) If `a < b` and `c < d`, then `a + c < b + d`. 2) If `a < b` and `0 < c` (meaning c is positive), then `ac < bc`. These properties ensure that the integers, along with their ordering, form an ordered ring.

How are integers typically defined in elementary school teaching?

In elementary school, integers are often intuitively defined as the union of the positive natural numbers (counting numbers), zero, and the negations of the natural numbers. This provides a simple, accessible understanding of the concept.

What is a drawback of the traditional piecewise definition of arithmetic operations on integers?

A drawback of the traditional piecewise style of defining arithmetic operations on integers (where each operation needs to be defined for every combination of positive, negative, and zero numbers) is that it leads to many different cases, making it tedious to prove that integers obey the various laws of arithmetic.

How are integers formally constructed in modern set-theoretic mathematics to avoid case distinctions in arithmetic operations?

In modern set-theoretic mathematics, integers are formally constructed as the equivalence classes of ordered pairs of natural numbers, denoted as `(a,b)`. This abstract approach allows for a more unified definition of arithmetic operations without needing separate rules for positive, negative, and zero numbers.

What is the intuitive meaning behind representing an integer as an ordered pair `(a,b)` in the set-theoretic construction?

The intuition behind representing an integer as an ordered pair `(a,b)` is that it stands for the result of subtracting `b` from `a`. For example, the pair (1,2) intuitively represents 1 - 2 = -1.

How is the equivalence relation `~` defined for ordered pairs of natural numbers in the construction of integers?

An equivalence relation `~` is defined on these ordered pairs such that `(a,b) ~ (c,d)` precisely when `a + d = b + c`. This ensures that pairs representing the same integer (e.g., (1,2) and (4,5) both representing -1) are considered equivalent.

How are addition and multiplication of integers defined using equivalence classes of ordered pairs?

Using `[(a,b)]` to denote the equivalence class of `(a,b)`, addition is defined as `[(a,b)] + [(c,d)] := [(a+c, b+d)]`. Multiplication is defined as `[(a,b)] ⋅ [(c,d)] := [(ac+bd, ad+bc)]`. These definitions ensure that the operations are consistent with how integers behave.

How is the negation (additive inverse) of an integer obtained in the ordered pair construction?

The negation, or additive inverse, of an integer represented by an equivalence class `[(a,b)]` is obtained by reversing the order of the pair: `-[ (a,b) ] := [ (b,a) ]`. This means that if `(a,b)` represents `a-b`, then `(b,a)` represents `b-a`, which is `-(a-b)`.

How is subtraction defined in terms of the ordered pair construction of integers?

Subtraction of integers in the ordered pair construction is defined as the addition of the additive inverse: `[(a,b)] - [(c,d)] := [(a+d, b+c)]`. This definition is derived from `[(a,b)] + (-[(c,d)])`, where `(-[(c,d)])` is `[(d,c)]`.

How is the standard ordering on integers defined using equivalence classes of ordered pairs?

The standard ordering on the integers, represented by equivalence classes, is defined as `[(a,b)] < [(c,d)]` if and only if `a + d < b + c`. This rule consistently determines whether one integer is less than another.

How are natural numbers identified within the equivalence class construction of integers?

Natural numbers are identified with specific equivalence classes in this construction. The natural number 'n' is identified with the class `[(n,0)]`. This means that natural numbers are embedded into the integers, with `[(0,0)]` representing zero, and `[(0,n)]` representing `-n`.

Provide examples of how specific integers (0, 1, -1, 2, -2) are represented as equivalence classes of ordered pairs.

In the ordered pair construction: 0 is represented by `[(0,0)]`, `[(1,1)]`, or generally `[(k,k)]`. 1 is `[(1,0)]`, `[(2,1)]`, or `[(k+1,k)]`. -1 is `[(0,1)]`, `[(1,2)]`, or `[(k,k+1)]`. 2 is `[(2,0)]`, `[(3,1)]`, or `[(k+2,k)]`. -2 is `[(0,2)]`, `[(1,3)]`, or `[(k,k+2)]`.

What alternative approaches for constructing integers are used in theoretical computer science?

In theoretical computer science, particularly in automated theorem provers and term rewrite engines, integers are represented as algebraic terms built using basic operations like 'zero', 'succ' (successor), and 'pred' (predecessor), assuming natural numbers are already constructed using Peano axioms.

How do different integer construction techniques in computer science vary?

These construction techniques differ in the number of basic operations used, the number and types of arguments accepted by these operations (usually 0 to 2), whether natural numbers are arguments, and whether the operations are 'free constructors' (meaning each integer has only one unique algebraic term representation) or not.

Why is the 'pair(x,y)' operation in the equivalence class construction not considered a 'free constructor'?

The 'pair(x,y)' operation in the equivalence class construction is not a 'free constructor' because the same integer can be represented by multiple algebraic terms. For example, the integer 0 can be represented as `pair(0,0)`, `pair(1,1)`, `pair(2,2)`, and so on, meaning there isn't a unique term for each integer.

Which proof assistant uses the equivalence class construction for integers, and why do other tools prefer alternative methods?

The proof assistant Isabelle uses the equivalence class construction for integers. However, many other tools prefer alternative construction techniques, particularly those based on free constructors, because they are simpler and can be implemented more efficiently in computers.

How does the common two's complement representation handle the sign of integers in computers?

In the common two's complement representation used in computers, the inherent definition of sign distinguishes between 'negative' and 'non-negative' numbers, rather than explicitly separating negative, positive, and zero. Despite this, computers can still determine if an integer value is truly positive.

Integer Wiki: Unlocking ℤ: A Scholarly Examination of Integers

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Defining Integers

The Set of Whole Numbers

An integer is formally defined as the number zero (0), a positive natural number (1, 2, 3, ...), or the negation of a positive natural number (−1, −2, −3, ...). These negations of positive natural numbers are specifically referred to as negative integers. The comprehensive set of all integers is commonly symbolized by the blackboard bold ℤ (from the German "Zahlen" meaning "numbers").

Hierarchical Relationships

The set of natural numbers (ℕ) constitutes a subset of ℤ. In turn, ℤ is a subset of the set of all rational numbers (ℤ), which itself is a subset of the real numbers (ℝ). This hierarchical embedding means that each number system builds upon the previous, with integers representing a crucial expansion beyond just positive counting numbers. For instance, 21, 4, 0, and −2048 are integers, whereas 9.75, 5⁄2, 5⁄4, and √2 are not, as they possess fractional components.

Countable Infinity

Similar to the set of natural numbers, the set of integers ℤ is considered countably infinite. This means that despite being infinite, its elements can be put into a one-to-one correspondence (a bijection) with the natural numbers. This property highlights a fundamental concept in set theory, demonstrating that not all infinities are of the same "size."

Historical Evolution

Etymological Roots

The term "integer" originates from the Latin word integer, meaning "whole" or, more literally, "untouched" (from in- "not" + tangere "to touch"). This etymology underscores the concept of a number without fractional parts. Historically, the term was applied to numbers that were multiples of 1, often synonymous with what we now call natural numbers. Early usage also referred to the whole part of a mixed number.

Inclusion of Negatives

The definition of integers expanded over time to incorporate negative numbers as their practical utility became increasingly recognized. For example, Leonhard Euler, in his 1765 work Elements of Algebra, explicitly defined integers to encompass both positive and negative numbers. This marked a significant conceptual shift, broadening the scope of "whole" numbers to include values less than zero.

The Symbol ℤ

The notation ℤ for the set of integers gained prominence towards the end of the 19th century, particularly with Georg Cantor's pioneering work on infinite sets and set theory. This symbol is derived from the German word Zahlen, meaning "numbers." Its adoption is often attributed to David Hilbert, and its earliest known appearance in a textbook dates to 1947, in the "Algèbre" by the collective Nicolas Bourbaki. While not immediately universal, ℤ became the standard notation in modern algebra texts by 1961.

Algebraic Properties

Closure Under Operations

The set of integers ℤ exhibits closure under addition and multiplication, meaning that the sum and product of any two integers will always result in another integer. Crucially, unlike the natural numbers, ℤ is also closed under subtraction. This property is fundamental to its algebraic structure. However, ℤ is not closed under division, as the quotient of two integers (e.g., 1 divided by 2) is not necessarily an integer.

Group and Ring Structure

The integers form an abelian group under addition. This means addition is associative, commutative, has an identity element (0), and every integer has an additive inverse (e.g., for `a`, its inverse is `-a`). Furthermore, ℤ is a cyclic group, as every non-zero integer can be expressed as a finite sum of 1s or -1s. In fact, ℤ under addition is the unique infinite cyclic group up to isomorphism.

When considering both addition and multiplication, ℤ forms a commutative ring with unity. This means it satisfies all the properties of an abelian group under addition, plus multiplication is associative, commutative, has a multiplicative identity (1), and multiplication distributes over addition. The integers serve as the most basic example of such an algebraic structure.

No Zero Divisors & Euclidean Domain

A significant property of integers is the absence of zero divisors: if the product of two integers `a` and `b` is 0, then at least one of `a` or `b` must be 0. This makes ℤ an integral domain.

While standard division is not always defined, Euclidean division (division with remainder) is. For any integers `a` and `b` (where `b ≠ 0`), there exist unique integers `q` (quotient) and `r` (remainder) such that `a = q × b + r` and `0 ≤ r < |b|`. This property makes ℤ a Euclidean domain, which implies it is also a principal ideal domain. Consequently, every positive integer can be uniquely factored into prime numbers, a principle known as the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic.

Properties of Integer Operations

Property	Addition	Multiplication
Closure:	`a + b` is an integer	`a × b` is an integer
Associativity:	`a + (b + c) = (a + b) + c`	`a × (b × c) = (a × b) × c`
Commutativity:	`a + b = b + a`	`a × b = b × a`
Identity Element:	`a + 0 = a`	`a × 1 = a`
Inverse Elements:	`a + (−a) = 0`	Only −1 and 1 are invertible (units).
Distributivity:	`a × (b + c) = (a × b) + (a × c)` and `(a + b) × c = (a × c) + (b × c)`
No Zero Divisors:		If `a × b = 0`, then `a = 0` or `b = 0` (or both)

Order-Theoretic Properties

Total Ordering

The set of integers ℤ is a totally ordered set, meaning that for any two distinct integers, one is always greater than the other. This ordering extends infinitely in both positive and negative directions, lacking any upper or lower bound. The familiar arrangement is: ... −3 < −2 < −1 < 0 < 1 < 2 < 3 < ...

Compatibility with Operations

The ordering of integers is compatible with their algebraic operations in specific ways:

If `a < b` and `c < d`, then `a + c < b + d`. This means that adding inequalities preserves their direction.
If `a < b` and `0 < c` (i.e., `c` is a positive integer), then `ac < bc`. This indicates that multiplying an inequality by a positive integer preserves its direction. If `c` were negative, the inequality would reverse.

These compatibilities establish ℤ, along with its ordering, as an ordered ring.

Unique Ordered Group

The integers are uniquely characterized as the only non-trivial totally ordered abelian group whose positive elements are well-ordered. This means that every non-empty subset of positive integers has a least element. This property is deeply connected to concepts in abstract algebra, such as Noetherian valuation rings, which are either fields or discrete valuation rings.

Construction of Integers

Traditional Approach

In foundational mathematics education, integers are often introduced intuitively as the union of positive natural numbers, zero, and the negations of the natural numbers. This can be formalized by first constructing the natural numbers (e.g., using Peano axioms), then creating a disjoint set for their negations, and finally including zero as a distinct element. While straightforward for conceptual understanding, defining arithmetic operations under this approach requires numerous case distinctions (e.g., positive + positive, positive + negative, etc.), making formal proofs of arithmetic laws cumbersome.

Equivalence Classes of Pairs

A more abstract and elegant construction, prevalent in modern set theory, defines integers as equivalence classes of ordered pairs of natural numbers, (a,b). The intuition behind this is that the pair (a,b) represents the result of subtracting b from a. For example, (1,2) and (4,5) both represent −1. An equivalence relation `~` is defined such that `(a,b) ~ (c,d)` if and only if `a + d = b + c`.

Using `[(a,b)]` to denote the equivalence class containing `(a,b)`:

Addition: `[(a,b)] + [(c,d)] := [(a+c, b+d)]`
Multiplication: `[(a,b)] · [(c,d)] := [(ac+bd, ad+bc)]`
Negation (Additive Inverse): `-[ (a,b) ] := [(b,a)]`
Subtraction: `[(a,b)] - [(c,d)] := [(a+d, b+c)]`
Ordering: `[(a,b)] < [(c,d)]` if and only if `a+d < b+c`

This construction ensures that these operations are well-defined, independent of the chosen representatives for the equivalence classes. Natural numbers `n` are identified with classes `[(n,0)]`, and negative integers `−n` with `[(0,n)]`, thereby recovering the familiar set {..., −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, ...}.

Integers in Computing

Data Types

In computer science, an integer is frequently a primitive data type in programming languages (e.g., `int` in C, Java, Delphi). However, due to the finite capacity of practical computers, these data types can only represent a subset of all mathematical integers. They are typically implemented with a fixed size, often a number of bits that is a power of 2 (e.g., 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 bits).

Representation & Sign

Common representations like two's complement inherently distinguish between "negative" and "non-negative" values, rather than explicitly separating negative, positive, and zero. While a computer can certainly determine if an integer value is truly positive, this underlying representation impacts how arithmetic operations are performed at a low level. For handling integers beyond fixed-size limits, variable-length representations, such as "bignums," are employed, allowing storage of any integer that fits within the computer's available memory.

Automated Reasoning

In theoretical computer science, particularly in automated theorem proving and term rewrite engines, integers are constructed using algebraic terms with basic operations like `zero`, `succ` (successor), and `pred` (predecessor). These constructions vary in the number and types of arguments, and whether they are "free constructors" (meaning each integer has only one unique representation). The equivalence class approach discussed earlier, for instance, is not a free constructor method, as zero can be represented by multiple pairs like (0,0), (1,1), etc. Other methods, often simpler and more efficient for computer implementation, utilize free constructors.

Cardinality of ℤ

Countably Infinite

The set of integers ℤ is classified as countably infinite. This means that despite being an infinite set, its elements can be put into a one-to-one correspondence with the set of natural numbers (1, 2, 3, ...). This concept, introduced by Georg Cantor, demonstrates that not all infinite sets are of the same "size."

Establishing a Bijection

To prove that ℤ is countably infinite, one must demonstrate a bijection (a one-to-one and onto mapping) between ℤ and ℕ. A common example of such a pairing is:

(0, 1), (1, 2), (−1, 3), (2, 4), (−2, 5), (3, 6), ...

More generally, this mapping can be expressed as:

For positive integers `k`: `k` maps to `2k`
For non-positive integers `k` (i.e., `0` and negative integers): `k` maps to `1 - 2k`

This systematic pairing ensures that every integer is mapped to a unique natural number, and every natural number corresponds to a unique integer.

Aleph-Null Cardinality

More technically, the cardinality of ℤ is denoted by ℵ₀ (aleph-null), which is the smallest infinite cardinal number. This is the same cardinality as the set of natural numbers, reinforcing the idea that these two sets, despite one containing the other and its negatives, are "equally infinite" in terms of their countability.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "Integer" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about integer while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

covington catholic high school

monophyly

renewable energy commercialization

doug collins politician

carpathian mountains

juan carlos ferrero

References

Encyclopaedia Britannica 1771, p. 367

Encyclopaedia Britannica 1771, p. 83

Keith Pledger and Dave Wilkins, "Edexcel AS and A Level Modular Mathematics: Core Mathematics 1" Pearson 2008

A full list of references for this article are available at the Integer Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not professional mathematical or academic advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for rigorous academic study, peer-reviewed literature, or consultation with qualified mathematicians or educators for specific research or learning needs. Always refer to authoritative textbooks and scholarly sources for in-depth understanding and verification.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.

Unlocking ℤ

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

Defining Integers ℹ️

🔢 The Set of Whole Numbers

🔗 Hierarchical Relationships

♾️ Countable Infinity

Historical Evolution 📜

🏛️ Etymological Roots

➕➖ Inclusion of Negatives

🔠 The Symbol ℤ

Algebraic Properties 🧮

🔒 Closure Under Operations

🔄 Group and Ring Structure

🚫 No Zero Divisors & Euclidean Domain

📋 Properties of Integer Operations

Order-Theoretic Properties 📏

↔️ Total Ordering

➕✖️ Compatibility with Operations

🌟 Unique Ordered Group

Construction of Integers 🏗️

📚 Traditional Approach

🧩 Equivalence Classes of Pairs

Integers in Computing 💻

💾 Data Types

↔️ Representation & Sign

🤖 Automated Reasoning

Cardinality of ℤ ∞

1️⃣2️⃣3️⃣ Countably Infinite

↔️ Establishing a Bijection

ℵ Aleph-Null Cardinality

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

Defining Integers

The Set of Whole Numbers

Hierarchical Relationships

Countable Infinity

Historical Evolution

Etymological Roots

Inclusion of Negatives

The Symbol ℤ

Algebraic Properties

Closure Under Operations

Group and Ring Structure

No Zero Divisors & Euclidean Domain

Properties of Integer Operations

Order-Theoretic Properties

Total Ordering

Compatibility with Operations

Unique Ordered Group

Construction of Integers

Traditional Approach

Equivalence Classes of Pairs

Integers in Computing

Data Types

Representation & Sign

Automated Reasoning

Cardinality of ℤ

Countably Infinite

Establishing a Bijection

Aleph-Null Cardinality

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Disclaimer

Important Notice