This is an interactive explainer based on the Wikipedia article about Kim Davis. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

The Davis Doctrine

An Examination of Faith, Duty, and the Intersection of Personal Beliefs with Public Service.

Learn More 👇 The Controversy ⚖️

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Biographical Overview

Early Life and Background

Kimberly Jean Davis, née Bailey, was born on September 17, 1965, in Morehead, Kentucky. Her early career in public service began within the Rowan County Clerk's office, where she served as chief deputy clerk for over two decades, reporting to her mother, Jean W. Bailey, who held the position of County Clerk.

Entry into Public Office

Following her mother's decision not to seek re-election, Davis entered the political arena. She successfully ran as a Democratic candidate for Rowan County Clerk in 2014, narrowly defeating Elwood Caudill Jr. in the primary. Her campaign emphasized her extensive 26-year tenure in the clerk's office, promising diligent service and responsible stewardship of taxpayer funds.

Compensation and Early Concerns

During her tenure as chief deputy clerk, Davis's compensation, including wages and overtime, was substantial. Reports indicated she earned more than other chief deputies in the county. This led to complaints from some county employees and residents regarding the clerk's office budget, prompting a reduction in the allocated funds for wages by the Fiscal Court.

County Clerk Tenure

Term of Service

Kim Davis officially assumed the role of Rowan County Clerk on January 5, 2015, commencing a four-year term scheduled to conclude on January 7, 2019. Her annual salary during this period was approximately $80,000.

Predecessor and Successor

Davis succeeded Jean W. Bailey, her mother, in the office of Rowan County Clerk. Following her defeat in the 2018 general election, Elwood Caudill Jr., whom she had previously defeated in the 2014 Democratic primary, took over the position.

The Marriage License Controversy

Legal Precedent and Religious Objection

The controversy ignited following the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark decision in Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. As a county clerk, Davis was legally obligated to issue marriage licenses to all eligible couples. However, citing deeply held religious beliefs rooted in her Apostolic Pentecostal faith, Davis refused to issue licenses to same-sex couples, asserting that doing so would violate her conscience and biblical principles.

Defiance and Legal Action

Davis's refusal extended to denying licenses to all couples, rather than selectively issuing them only to opposite-sex couples. This defiance led to multiple lawsuits, including Miller v. Davis, filed by couples represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other legal counsel. Despite court orders from U.S. District Judge David L. Bunning, including a temporary stay and subsequent appeals, Davis persisted in her refusal.

Contempt of Court and Incarceration

On September 3, 2015, Judge Bunning found Kim Davis in contempt of court for her continued defiance of federal orders. She was subsequently jailed in the Carter County Detention Center. Her incarceration lasted five days, with her release conditioned on her not interfering with her deputy clerks' efforts to issue marriage licenses to all legally eligible couples.

Return to Office and Modified Forms

Upon her release, Davis returned to her duties but maintained her stance against personally issuing licenses to same-sex couples. She instructed her deputy clerks to use altered license forms that omitted her name and title, a move that drew further legal scrutiny from the ACLU. While the altered forms were deemed likely legal by Judge Bunning, the underlying legal battles over damages and fees continued.

Public and Political Reactions

Legal and Ethical Perspectives

Legal experts largely asserted that Davis, as an elected official sworn to uphold the Constitution, could not legally refuse to perform her duties based on personal religious objections. Figures like Columbia Law professor Katherine Franke argued that her religious beliefs were irrelevant to her official function. Comparisons were drawn to historical figures like Alabama Governor George Wallace, who resisted federal desegregation orders.

Political Support and Opposition

Davis garnered significant support from various conservative political figures and organizations, including presidential candidates Mike Huckabee and Ted Cruz, who framed her actions as a defense of religious freedom against "judicial tyranny." Conversely, many political leaders, including then-Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest, emphasized the principle that no public official is above the law.

Papal Encounter and Vatican Clarification

In a notable development, Davis met with Pope Francis during his 2015 visit to the United States. Davis and her legal team interpreted the meeting as papal support for her stance. However, the Holy See Press Office later issued a statement clarifying that the meeting did not constitute an endorsement of her specific position, emphasizing the Pope's broader support for conscientious objection as a human right.

Political Landscape

Party Affiliation Shift

Following the intense public scrutiny and controversy, Davis announced that she and her husband had switched their party affiliation from Democratic to Republican. This move reflected a broader political alignment with conservative viewpoints on religious freedom and social issues.

Electoral Defeat

Davis sought re-election in 2018, this time as a Republican candidate. However, she was defeated in the general election by Democrat Elwood Caudill Jr., who had previously challenged her in the 2014 Democratic primary. This electoral outcome marked the end of her tenure as Rowan County Clerk.

Legal Fees and Damages

The legal ramifications of Davis's actions continued beyond her term. Court rulings mandated that the state of Kentucky cover significant legal fees awarded to the plaintiffs. Davis herself was later ordered by a jury to pay substantial damages to David Ermold and David Moore for emotional distress, a decision her legal team vowed to appeal, even seeking to challenge the Obergefell ruling itself.

Personal Life and Beliefs

Marital History

Davis has been married four times to three different husbands. Her marital history, including divorces and remarriages, has been noted in public discourse, with some commentators questioning the application of her religious convictions in light of her personal life experiences.

Religious Awakening and Tenets

Davis attributes a profound religious awakening in 2011 to her current faith. She identifies with the Apostolic Pentecostal movement, which emphasizes a literal interpretation of the Bible and tenets of outward holiness, including modest dress and abstention from makeup and jewelry. She actively participates in church services and leads a weekly Bible study for female inmates.

Views on End Times

In interviews, Davis has expressed her belief that society is living in "end times" and views the Bible as infallible. Her convictions strongly inform her public stance on issues related to marriage and religious freedom.

Electoral History

Election Results

The following tables detail Kim Davis's electoral performance in Rowan County.

2014 Rowan County Clerk Democratic Primary

Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kim Davis 1,817 46.2%
Democratic Elwood Caudill Jr. 1,794 45.6%
Democratic Charlotte Combess 322 8.2%

2014 Rowan County Clerk General Election

Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kim Davis 3,909 53.2%
Republican John C. Cox 3,444 46.8%

Democratic hold.

2018 Rowan County Clerk Republican Primary

Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Kim Davis (Incumbent) Unopposed 100%

2018 Rowan County Clerk General Election

Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Elwood Caudill Jr. 4,210 54.14%
Republican Kim Davis (Incumbent) 3,566 45.86%

Democratic gain from Republican.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Kim Davis" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about kim_davis while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

References

References

  1.  Chief Deputy Sheriff Joe Cline received $38,000 annually and Deputy Judge-Executive Jerry Alderman $36,000 annually; neither received overtime pay.
  2.  Ermold v. Davis, PacerMonitor (Kentucky Eastern District Court July 10, 2015).
  3.  Ermold v. Davis, PlainSite (Kentucky Eastern District Court July 10, 2015).
  4.  Ermold v. Davis, Justia (Kentucky Eastern District Court July 10, 2015).
  5.  Yates v. Davis, PacerMonitor (Kentucky Eastern District Court August 25, 2015).
  6.  Yates v. Davis, PlainSite (Kentucky Eastern District Court August 25, 2015).
  7.  Yates v. Davis, Justia (Kentucky Eastern District Court August 25, 2015).
A full list of references for this article are available at the Kim Davis Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not legal or religious advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional legal consultation, religious guidance, or advice from qualified professionals. Always consult with appropriate experts for specific legal, ethical, or religious matters.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.