Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 7
Kim Davis held the office of County Clerk for Rowan County, Kentucky, from January 2015 to January 2019.
Answer: True
Kim Davis served as the Clerk of Rowan County, Kentucky, for the specified period.
Before 2015, Kim Davis was affiliated with the Democratic Party.
Answer: True
The source material indicates that Kim Davis was affiliated with the Democratic Party from 1983 until 2015.
Kim Davis switched her political party affiliation from Republican to Democratic in 2015.
Answer: False
Kim Davis switched her political party affiliation from Democratic to Republican in 2015.
Kim Davis earned an annual salary of $80,000 as Rowan County Clerk in 2015.
Answer: True
In 2015, Kim Davis's annual remuneration as Rowan County Clerk amounted to $80,000.
Before becoming County Clerk, Kim Davis worked as a sheriff's deputy.
Answer: False
Before her election as County Clerk, Kim Davis served as the chief deputy clerk of Rowan County.
Kim Davis won the 2014 Democratic primary election by a significant margin against Elwood Caudill Jr.
Answer: False
Kim Davis secured a narrow victory in the 2014 Democratic primary election, prevailing by 23 votes against Elwood Caudill Jr.
In 2011, Kim Davis earned approximately $51,812 in wages as chief deputy clerk.
Answer: True
In 2011, Kim Davis's earnings as chief deputy clerk totaled $51,812 in wages.
Who is Kim Davis and what is her primary claim to fame?
Answer: A county clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples due to religious objections.
Kim Davis, a former County Clerk for Rowan County, Kentucky, gained international attention for her refusal to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples based on religious objections.
What was Kim Davis's political party affiliation before 2015?
Answer: Democratic
Kim Davis maintained affiliation with the Democratic Party from 1983 until 2015.
The Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide was known as *Obergefell v. Hodges*.
Answer: True
The landmark Supreme Court decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide was *Obergefell v. Hodges*.
Most legal experts agreed that Kim Davis had the legal right to refuse issuing marriage licenses based on personal beliefs.
Answer: False
The prevailing consensus among legal experts was that Kim Davis did not possess the legal authority to refuse issuing marriage licenses based on personal beliefs.
What was the landmark Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide?
Answer: Obergefell v. Hodges
The Supreme Court's landmark ruling in *Obergefell v. Hodges* legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
Who ordered Kentucky county clerks to issue same-sex marriage licenses immediately?
Answer: Governor Steve Beshear
Governor Steve Beshear issued a directive mandating all Kentucky county clerks to issue same-sex marriage licenses forthwith.
What was the primary legal argument made by many experts regarding Kim Davis's refusal to issue licenses?
Answer: She had no legal standing to refuse, as public servants must uphold the law.
A significant consensus among legal experts maintained that Davis lacked the legal authority to refuse the issuance of marriage licenses, as her public service role necessitated adherence to the law.
Kim Davis attributed her refusal to issue marriage licenses to her conversion to the Baptist faith in 2011.
Answer: False
Davis identified with the Apostolic Pentecostal movement, not the Baptist faith, following her religious awakening in 2011.
Davis expressed a belief that the Bible was fallible and that society was moving towards more liberal interpretations of marriage.
Answer: False
Davis articulated a conviction in the Bible's infallibility and did not express a view that society was moving towards more liberal interpretations of marriage.
After her religious conversion, Kim Davis stopped wearing makeup and jewelry and began wearing skirts below the knee.
Answer: True
Subsequent to her religious conversion, Davis adopted more conservative attire, including skirts below the knee and abstaining from makeup and jewelry.
Pope Francis affirmed that conscientious objection is a right that must be respected within judicial structures.
Answer: True
Pope Francis asserted that conscientious objection is an inherent human right that must be upheld within judicial frameworks.
Davis's lawyers argued that the lawsuits against her were primarily about forcing her to violate her religious beliefs.
Answer: True
Davis's legal counsel contended that the lawsuits were fundamentally aimed at compelling her to contravene her religious convictions.
Davis's lawyers claimed the ACLU lawsuit was solely about the plaintiffs' desire to marry.
Answer: False
Davis's legal counsel asserted the ACLU's lawsuit was not merely about the plaintiffs' desire to marry, but about compelling Davis to violate her religious beliefs.
Kim Davis stated in a 2016 interview that she believed society was progressing towards greater acceptance of marriage equality.
Answer: False
In a January 2016 interview, Kim Davis expressed her conviction that 'we are living in end times,' not that society was progressing towards greater acceptance of marriage equality.
What reason did Kim Davis provide for her refusal to issue marriage licenses?
Answer: Personal religious objections to same-sex marriage conflicted with her conscience.
Davis cited personal religious objections to same-sex marriage as the basis for her refusal, stating it would violate her conscience.
What religious movement does Kim Davis identify with, influencing her stance?
Answer: Apostolic Pentecostal
Davis identified as a Christian adherent of the Apostolic Pentecostal movement, which influenced her religious convictions.
What did Kim Davis say about the times she was living in during a January 2016 interview?
Answer: She expressed the view that 'we are living in end times.'
During a January 2016 interview, Kim Davis articulated her conviction that 'we are living in end times.'
What was the primary argument made by Davis's lawyers regarding the ACLU's lawsuit?
Answer: The lawsuit aimed to force Davis to violate her religious beliefs.
Davis's legal counsel asserted that the ACLU's lawsuit was not predicated on the plaintiffs' aspiration to marry, but rather on compelling Kim Davis to sanction their marriages, thereby violating her religious convictions.
Kim Davis refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples solely because of a directive from Governor Steve Beshear.
Answer: False
Kim Davis cited personal religious objections to same-sex marriage as her reason for refusal, not solely a directive from Governor Steve Beshear.
Kim Davis was jailed for contempt of court after defying a federal court order to issue marriage licenses.
Answer: True
Davis was incarcerated for contempt of court due to her persistent defiance of judicial orders to issue marriage licenses.
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear Kim Davis's appeal regarding her refusal to issue marriage licenses.
Answer: False
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Kim Davis's emergency application for appeal.
Judge David L. Bunning jailed Kim Davis because she failed to pay her legal fees promptly.
Answer: False
Judge Bunning held Kim Davis in contempt of court for defying his order to issue marriage licenses, not for failing to pay legal fees.
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals refused to extend the stay on Davis's orders, stating a clerk could not decline to act in accordance with the Constitution.
Answer: True
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals declared that a clerk is precluded from refusing to act in accordance with the United States Constitution.
Judge Bunning's release order for Kim Davis prohibited her from interfering with her deputy clerks issuing marriage licenses.
Answer: True
Judge Bunning's order stipulated that Davis was prohibited from impeding her deputy clerks' issuance of marriage licenses.
Kim Davis stated that resigning would solve the issue of issuing marriage licenses.
Answer: False
Davis articulated that resigning from her position would not resolve the issue of issuing marriage licenses.
What legal action was taken against Kim Davis after she continued to defy the court order?
Answer: She was held in contempt of court and jailed.
Following her persistent defiance of judicial orders, Kim Davis was adjudged in contempt of court and incarcerated.
What was the outcome of Kim Davis's emergency application to the U.S. Supreme Court?
Answer: The Court refused to hear her appeal.
The U.S. Supreme Court declined to adjudicate Kim Davis's emergency application for appeal.
Why did Judge David L. Bunning hold Kim Davis in contempt of court?
Answer: She continued to defy the order to issue marriage licenses.
Judge Bunning adjudged Kim Davis in contempt of court due to her persistent defiance of his order to issue marriage licenses.
What did Kim Davis state was the reason she did not resign when faced with the court order?
Answer: She felt resigning would solve nothing and help nobody.
Davis articulated that resigning from her position would yield no resolution and provide no benefit to anyone.
A jury ordered Kim Davis personally to pay $100,000 in damages related to the lawsuits.
Answer: True
A jury imposed a personal liability of $100,000 in damages upon Kim Davis stemming from the lawsuits.
Mark Sevier sued Kim Davis in 2017 after being denied a license to marry his pet dog.
Answer: False
Mark Sevier sued Kim Davis after being denied a license to marry a laptop computer, not a pet dog.
The Attorney General's Office found Davis violated the Open Records Act by intentionally frustrating public records requests.
Answer: True
The Attorney General's Office concluded that Davis had contravened the Open Records Act through intentional obstruction of public records requests.
The ACLU's motion to recover legal fees was denied because they were considered the 'prevailing party'.
Answer: False
The ACLU's motion seeking recovery of legal fees was denied on the grounds that the organization was not deemed a 'prevailing party'.
How much in damages was Kim Davis personally ordered to pay by a jury?
Answer: $100,000
A jury imposed a personal liability of $100,000 in damages upon Kim Davis.
What was the outcome regarding the ACLU's attempt to recover legal fees from Kim Davis?
Answer: Their motion was denied because they were not the 'prevailing party'.
The ACLU's motion seeking recovery of legal fees was denied on the grounds that the organization was not deemed a 'prevailing party'.
Liberty Counsel, a law firm based in Florida, represented Kim Davis during the controversy.
Answer: True
Kim Davis received legal representation from the Florida-based law firm, Liberty Counsel.
Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear supported Kim Davis's stance and offered to call a special legislative session to address her concerns.
Answer: False
Governor Steve Beshear ordered clerks to issue licenses and stated he lacked the authority to call a special session to address Davis's concerns.
Prominent figures like Mike Huckabee publicly supported Kim Davis's stance on religious grounds.
Answer: True
Figures such as Mike Huckabee expressed support for Kim Davis, characterizing her jailing as the 'criminalization of Christianity'.
Other court clerks in the U.S., particularly in Alabama, also stopped issuing marriage licenses to avoid controversy.
Answer: True
Indeed, other court clerks, notably probate judges in numerous Alabama counties, ceased issuing marriage licenses entirely.
Kim Davis's controversy did not generate significant public attention or satirical works.
Answer: False
Davis's controversy garnered substantial public attention and became the subject of numerous satirical works.
Kim Davis's office reported receiving numerous death threats following the controversy.
Answer: True
In the aftermath of the controversy, Kim Davis's office reported receiving a substantial volume of death threats.
The Holy See Press Office stated that Pope Francis's meeting with Kim Davis was a clear endorsement of her stance.
Answer: False
The Holy See Press Office clarified that the Pope's meeting with Davis was not a clear endorsement of her specific position.
Kim Davis's son, Nathan Davis, supported same-sex marriage and continued issuing licenses.
Answer: False
Nathan Davis, employed in his mother's office, adopted a similar stance, refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
A YouGov survey indicated that a majority of American adults supported Judge Bunning's decision to jail Kim Davis.
Answer: True
A YouGov survey revealed that 56% of American adults endorsed Judge Bunning's decision to incarcerate Davis for contempt of court.
Which law firm represented Kim Davis during the controversy?
Answer: Liberty Counsel
Kim Davis received legal representation from the Maitland, Florida-based law firm, Liberty Counsel.
Which prominent political figure supported Kim Davis, calling her jailing the 'criminalization of Christianity'?
Answer: Mike Huckabee
Figures such as Mike Huckabee expressed support for Kim Davis, characterizing her jailing as the 'criminalization of Christianity'.
Besides Kim Davis, which group of officials also stopped issuing marriage licenses to avoid controversy?
Answer: Probate judges in several Alabama counties
Other court clerks, notably probate judges in numerous Alabama counties, ceased issuing marriage licenses entirely to avoid controversy.
Which television show featured a portrayal of Kim Davis?
Answer: Saturday Night Live
Kim Davis's persona was depicted on the television program 'Saturday Night Live'.
How did Kim Davis's son, Nathan Davis, follow her stance on issuing marriage licenses?
Answer: He also denied marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
Nathan Davis, employed in his mother's office as a deputy clerk, adopted a similar stance, refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
What did a September 2015 YouGov survey reveal about public opinion on Judge Bunning's decision to jail Kim Davis?
Answer: 56% supported the decision, 31% opposed.
A YouGov survey revealed that 56% of American adults endorsed Judge Bunning's decision to incarcerate Davis for contempt of court, with 31% opposing it.
Upon her release from jail, Kim Davis immediately resumed issuing marriage licenses bearing her name.
Answer: False
Upon resuming her duties post-incarceration, Kim Davis modified the marriage license forms to omit her name.
After Kim Davis was jailed, her deputy clerks continued issuing marriage licenses that were authorized by 'the office of the Rowan County Clerk'.
Answer: True
Subsequent to Kim Davis's incarceration, her deputy clerks commenced issuing marriage licenses authenticated by 'the office of the Rowan County Clerk'.
Kim Davis won her reelection campaign in 2018 as a Republican candidate.
Answer: False
Kim Davis sought reelection in 2018 as a Republican candidate but was ultimately defeated.
Governor Matt Bevin issued an executive order that removed county clerks' names from state marriage licenses shortly after taking office.
Answer: True
Governor Matt Bevin promulgated an executive order mandating the removal of county clerks' names from state marriage licenses.
In the 2018 general election, Kim Davis was defeated by Republican challenger Elwood Caudill Jr.
Answer: False
In the 2018 general election, Kim Davis was unsuccessful in her bid for reelection, being defeated by Democratic challenger Elwood Caudill Jr.
In March 2022, a judge ruled that Kim Davis had violated the constitutional rights of plaintiffs by using her own rights as a shield.
Answer: True
A judicial ruling in March 2022 determined that Davis had infringed upon the constitutional rights of plaintiffs.
In July 2025, Davis's lawyers asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn the Sixth Circuit ruling and reconsider *Obergefell v. Hodges*.
Answer: True
In July 2025, Davis's legal counsel petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to vacate the Sixth Circuit ruling and to reconsider the precedent set by *Obergefell v. Hodges*.
After Davis's jail time, the marriage license forms were changed to remove her name and reference a federal court order.
Answer: True
Subsequent to Davis's incarceration, the marriage license forms were altered to remove her name and include a reference to a federal court order.
What change did Kim Davis make to the marriage license forms after her release from jail?
Answer: She removed her name from the forms.
Upon resuming her duties post-incarceration, Kim Davis modified the marriage license forms to omit her name.
What happened to the marriage licenses issued by deputy clerks after Kim Davis was jailed?
Answer: They were authorized by 'the office of the Rowan County Clerk' and did not bear Davis's name.
Subsequent to Kim Davis's incarceration, her deputy clerks commenced issuing marriage licenses authenticated by 'the office of the Rowan County Clerk' but did not bear her name.
What was the result of Kim Davis's 2018 reelection campaign?
Answer: She was defeated by a Democratic challenger.
In the 2018 general election, Kim Davis was unsuccessful in her bid for reelection, being defeated by Democratic challenger Elwood Caudill Jr.
What action did Governor Matt Bevin take regarding marriage licenses shortly after taking office?
Answer: He issued an executive order removing county clerks' names from state marriage licenses.
Governor Matt Bevin promulgated an executive order mandating the removal of county clerks' names from state marriage licenses.
What specific change was made to the marriage license forms after Davis's jail time?
Answer: It was changed from 'Deputy Clerk' to 'Notary Public'.
The title 'deputy clerk' on the altered marriage license forms was redesignated as 'notary public'.
What was the final legal ruling regarding Kim Davis's violation of constitutional rights in March 2022?
Answer: She was ruled to have violated plaintiffs' constitutional rights.
A judicial ruling in March 2022 determined that Davis had infringed upon the constitutional rights of plaintiffs.