Laissez-Faire: The Unfettered Economy
An exploration of the economic philosophy advocating for minimal government intervention, allowing markets to operate freely.
What is Laissez-Faire? 👇 Explore History ⏳Dive in with Flashcard Learning!
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮
The Core Concept
Economic Freedom
Laissez-faire, a French term meaning "let do" or "let it be," describes an economic system characterized by minimal to no government intervention in market transactions. This philosophy rests on the foundational axioms that the individual is the primary unit of society, possesses a natural right to freedom, and that the natural order of the economy is inherently self-regulating.
Competitive Markets
A fundamental principle of laissez-faire is the emphasis on competitive markets. Early proponents stressed that markets should naturally foster competition, believing this mechanism drives efficiency and innovation without the need for external regulation.
Role of Government
Proponents advocate for a near-complete separation of government from the economic sphere. The government's role is ideally limited to upholding fundamental rights, such as private property and individual liberty, and ensuring the basic legal framework for contracts, rather than actively managing or directing economic activity.
Origins of the Phrase
French Roots
The phrase laissez faire, laissez passer ("let do, let pass") is often attributed to French minister Vincent de Gournay. It gained prominence in the mid-18th century, reflecting a growing sentiment against the heavy mercantilist regulations prevalent in France at the time.
Philosophical Basis
The concept draws inspiration from Enlightenment ideals and potentially from the Taoist principle of wu wei (non-action). It suggests that economic systems function best when left to their own natural course, guided by individual self-interest contributing to the collective good.
English Adoption
The term entered English usage in the late 18th century, popularized through discussions of Physiocratic ideas and later adopted by classical economists. Its association with the Anti-Corn Law League in Britain further cemented its meaning related to free trade principles.
Historical Trajectory
Ancient Rome
Elements of laissez-faire principles, particularly regarding private property and freedom of contract, can be traced back to Roman law. While public law allowed state interference, private law emphasized individual economic freedom, a concept that influenced Western legal traditions.
European Development
The Physiocrats in 18th-century France were key proponents, advocating for deregulation and a single tax on land rent. Adam Smith's work, particularly The Wealth of Nations, further developed these ideas, linking laissez-faire with the concept of the "invisible hand" guiding markets toward natural order and liberty.
United States Context
In the U.S., the interpretation of laissez-faire evolved. While classical liberals supported free markets, they also accepted government intervention for specific purposes like tariffs and infrastructure development. The concept has been debated alongside policies like the New Deal and Reaganomics, with figures like Ayn Rand advocating for a strict interpretation.
Relationship with Other Systems
Laissez-Faire Capitalism
Often termed "raw," "pure," or "unrestrained" capitalism, this model emphasizes minimal government and is driven primarily by the profit motive. Advocates argue it fosters voluntary relationships and competition, benefiting both workers and consumers through market forces.
Laissez-Faire and Socialism
While seemingly contradictory, some socialist traditions, particularly market anarchism and mutualism, incorporate elements of laissez-faire by advocating for free markets and voluntary cooperation without state control. However, traditional socialism typically involves significant state planning or collective ownership, contrasting sharply with laissez-faire principles.
Mixed Economies
Most modern economies operate as mixed economies, blending elements of free markets with government regulation and intervention. This approach contrasts with the pure laissez-faire ideal, aiming to balance economic freedom with social welfare and stability.
Key Principles
Property Rights
The protection of private property rights is paramount. This ensures individuals can own, use, and exchange resources freely, forming the basis for market transactions.
Non-Intervention
Government should refrain from interfering in economic activities through measures like subsidies, price controls, or excessive regulation. The belief is that such interventions distort natural market mechanisms.
Individualism
Emphasis is placed on individual autonomy, freedom of choice, and voluntary association in economic dealings. The pursuit of individual self-interest is seen as the engine of economic prosperity.
Key Figures and Ideas
Early Advocates
Thinkers like Vincent de Gournay and François Quesnay championed the idea in France. Adam Smith, though not using the term, laid crucial groundwork with his concept of the "invisible hand" in The Wealth of Nations, arguing that individual self-interest unintentionally benefits society.
Classical Economists
Classical economists like David Ricardo and Thomas Malthus, while not directly using the phrase, contributed to the body of thought supporting free markets. Jeremy Bentham and James Mill also engaged with the concept, helping to popularize it in English discourse.
Modern Adherents
Figures like Ayn Rand strongly advocated for laissez-faire capitalism as the only moral social system, emphasizing individual rights and the separation of state and economics. Economists like Milton Friedman and Thomas Sowell have also articulated arguments supporting free-market principles with minimal government intervention.
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "Laissez-faire" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
- Quick Reference Handbook Set, Basic Knowledge and Modern Technology (revised) by Edward H. Litchfield, PhD
- Edward H. Litchfield. "Quick Reference Handbook Set, Basic Knowledge and Modern Technology" (revised ed.).
- As quoted in J. M. Keynes, 1926, "The End of Laissez Faire". Argenson's Mémoirs were published only in 1858, ed. Jannet, Tome V, p. 362. See A. Oncken (Die Maxime Laissez faire et laissez passer, ihr Ursprung, ihr Werden, 1866).
- "Tant, encore une fois, qu'on laisse faire la nature, on ne doit rien craindre de pareil", P.S. de Boisguilbert, 1707, Dissertation de la nature des richesses, de l'argent et des tributs.
- Fine, Sidney. Laissez Faire and the General-Welfare State. United States: The University of Michigan Press, 1964. Print
- Gotthelf 2000, pp. 91â92; Peikoff 1991, pp. 379â380.
- Sciabarra 1995, pp. 266â267; Burns 2009, pp. 268â269.
- Sciabarra 1995, pp. 280â281; Peikoff 1991, pp. 371â372; Merrill 1991, p. 139.
- Chartier, Gary; Johnson, Charles W. (2011). Markets Not Capitalism: Individualist Anarchism Against Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty. Brooklyn, NY:Minor Compositions/Autonomedia
- Brown, Susan Love. 1997. "The Free Market as Salvation from Government". In Meanings of the Market: The Free Market in Western Culture. Berg Publishers. p. 107.
- Carson, Kevin A. (2008). Organization Theory: A Libertarian Perspective. Charleston, SC:BookSurge.
- Carson, Kevin A. (2010). The Homebrew Industrial Revolution: A Low-Overhead Manifesto. Charleston, SC: BookSurge.
- Long, Roderick T. (2000). Reason and Value: Aristotle versus Rand. Washington, DC:Objectivist Center
- Sciabarra, Chris Matthew (2000). Total Freedom: Toward a Dialectical Libertarianism. University Park, PA:Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Chartier, Gary (2009). Economic Justice and Natural Law. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
- Gillis, William (2011). "The Freed Market." In Chartier, Gary and Johnson, Charles. Markets Not Capitalism. Brooklyn, NY: Minor Compositions/Autonomedia. pp. 19â20.
- Chartier, Gary; Johnson, Charles W. (2011). Markets Not Capitalism: Individualist Anarchism Against Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty. Brooklyn, NY: Minor Compositions/Autonomedia. pp. 1â16.
- Gary Chartier and Charles W. Johnson (eds). Markets Not Capitalism: Individualist Anarchism Against Bosses, Inequality, Corporate Power, and Structural Poverty. Minor Compositions; 1st edition (November 5, 2011
- See Gary Chartier, Anarchy and Legal Order: Law and Politics for a Stateless Society (New York: Cambridge UP 2013) 44â156.
- See Gary Chartier, "Natural Law and Non-Aggression," Acta Juridica Hungarica 51.2 (June 2010): 79â96 and, for an earlier version, Justice 32â46.
- See Gary Chartier, "Pirate Constitutions and Workplace Democracy," Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 18 (2010): 449â467.
- See Gary Chartier,' "Intellectual Property and Natural Law," Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 36 (2011): 58â88.
- Spencer J. Pack. Capitalism as a Moral System: Adam Smith's Critique of the Free Market Economy. Great Britain: Edward Elgar, 2010. Print
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.
This is not financial or economic advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional economic consultation, analysis, or investment advice. Always seek the advice of a qualified professional with any questions you may have regarding economic or financial matters. Never disregard professional advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this website.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.