The Nation of Islam
A Deep Dive into Faith, History, and Influence.
What is NOI? 👇 Explore History 📜Dive in with Flashcard Learning!
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮
Defining the Nation of Islam
Religious Movement
The Nation of Islam (NOI) is a religious organization founded in the United States by Wallace Fard Muhammad in 1930. Characterized by its unique theological tenets and commitment to Black nationalism, the NOI focuses on the African diaspora, particularly African Americans. While utilizing Islamic terminology and identifying as Islamic, its doctrines diverge significantly from orthodox Islamic traditions. Scholars of religion typically classify it as a new religious movement.
Black Nationalism and Separatism
A core tenet of the NOI is Black nationalism, advocating for the economic self-sufficiency and political separation of African Americans. The organization campaigns for the establishment of an independent African American nation-state, viewing the white-dominated society of the United States as inherently oppressive. This separatist stance has historically positioned the NOI apart from mainstream civil rights movements advocating for integration.
Millenarianism and Spaceships
The NOI possesses a distinct millenarian tradition, anticipating a future apocalyptic event. Central to this eschatology is the belief in a large spaceship, referred to as the "Mother Plane" or "Mother Ship," which is prophesied to return to overthrow the current world order and establish a utopia. This element has led some scholars to draw parallels with UFO religions.
Historical Trajectory
Foundation and Early Years
Founded by Wallace Fard Muhammad in Detroit in July 1930, the NOI emerged from a context of significant African American migration and the search for identity. Fard Muhammad drew inspiration from sources like Noble Drew Ali's Moorish Science Temple and Marcus Garvey's Garveyism. After Fard Muhammad's disappearance in 1934, Elijah Muhammad assumed leadership, expanding the organization's teachings and establishing a substantial business empire.
Rise to Prominence
During the 1950s and 1960s, the NOI gained national attention, partly due to influential members like Malcolm X and Muhammad Ali. The FBI actively monitored and sought to undermine the group. Despite facing media criticism and internal schisms, the Nation's message resonated with many African Americans seeking empowerment and self-determination.
Transitions and Revivals
Following Elijah Muhammad's death in 1975, his son Wallace D. Muhammad led the organization toward Sunni Islam, renaming it the American Society of Muslims. However, Louis Farrakhan, disagreeing with these reforms, re-established the Nation of Islam in 1977. Farrakhan's leadership saw a resurgence in membership and a continued emphasis on the original NOI teachings, albeit with further theological developments and outreach efforts.
Core Beliefs and Theology
Divine Nature of Allah
The NOI teaches that Allah is not an incorporeal spiritual entity but a physical being, specifically a black man. This anthropomorphic view posits a succession of mortal Allahs, with Wallace Fard Muhammad identified as the latest. These divine figures are believed to possess immense power and wisdom, ruling for cyclical periods.
The Myth of Yakub
A central narrative is the myth of Yakub, a black scientist who, through selective breeding over centuries on the island of Patmos, allegedly created the white race. This race is depicted as inherently flawed, lacking divinity, and prone to violence and deceit—a concept often referred to as "tricknology." This myth serves as a foundational element of the NOI's cosmology and racial ideology.
Cosmogony and Creation
The NOI's cosmology posits a universe originating from darkness, with the first Allah creating the Sun, planets, and the "Original" or "Asiatic" race approximately 76 trillion years ago. This race, described as divine and possessing psychic abilities, is believed to be the progenitor of all people of color. The creation of the moon is attributed to a renegade god-scientist's attempt to destroy Earth.
Organizational Practices
Discipline and Lifestyle
Members are expected to adhere to a highly disciplined lifestyle. This includes strict dress codes, specific dietary requirements (often emphasizing healthy eating, as detailed in Elijah Muhammad's "How to Eat to Live"), and adherence to patriarchal gender roles. The organization emphasizes personal responsibility and community upliftment.
Fruit of Islam and MGT
The NOI established paramilitary wings: the Fruit of Islam (FOI) for men, responsible for security and discipline, and the Muslim Girls Training (MGT) School for women, focused on domestic skills and modesty. These organizations reinforce the group's structured approach to gender roles and community order.
Publications and Outreach
The Nation disseminates its teachings through various publications, notably the newspaper The Final Call. These platforms are crucial for outreach, education, and reinforcing the organization's message within the African American community and beyond. The NOI also engages in economic and agricultural enterprises.
Theological Divergences
Relationship to Islam
While the NOI identifies as Islamic and incorporates elements like Arabic prayers and Islamic terminology, its theology significantly deviates from mainstream Sunni or Shia Islam. Key differences include the anthropomorphic nature of God, the divinity of Fard Muhammad, the rejection of Muhammad as the final prophet, and the absence of the Five Pillars of Islam as typically understood. Mainstream Muslims generally view the NOI as outside the fold of orthodox Islam.
Critique of Christianity
The NOI views Christianity as a tool of white supremacy, used historically to subjugate black people. Its teachings often critique Christian doctrines, including the nature of Jesus, the virgin birth, and the concept of heaven, presenting them as constructs designed to maintain white dominance and pacify the oppressed.
Inner Divinity and Self-Knowledge
Reflecting a common theme in Black-oriented new religious movements, the NOI emphasizes the inherent divinity within humanity, particularly within black people. The concept of "knowledge of self" is crucial for adherents to realize their inner godliness and potential psychic abilities, challenging notions of inherent inferiority.
Cosmic Origins
Primordial Darkness and Creation
The NOI's creation narrative begins with primordial darkness. The first Allah is said to have manifested 76 trillion years ago, taking millions of years to form into a black man. This divine being then created the celestial bodies and the Original Asiatic Race, comprising 13 tribes, who were inherently divine and possessed psychic powers.
The Moon's Origin
According to NOI teachings, a renegade god-scientist attempted to destroy Earth with explosives 66 trillion years ago. The resulting explosion ejected a mass of Earth into orbit, forming the moon. One of the 13 original tribes was trapped on the moon and perished due to a lack of water.
The Mother Book and Dinosaurs
The NOI posits that 15,000 years ago, god-scientists recorded future knowledge in a "Mother Book." Parts of this text are believed to have been passed down through the Torah, Gospels, and Quran. The organization also rejects the scientific consensus on dinosaurs, viewing them as a hoax perpetrated by white scientists.
The Myth of Yakub
Yakub's Experiments
The myth of Yakub, detailed in Elijah Muhammad's Message to the Blackman, describes Yakub as a black scientist who, exiled to Patmos, conducted a selective breeding program over centuries. This process aimed to create a distinct race by killing darker infants and breeding lighter-skinned offspring, ultimately resulting in the white race.
The White Race as "Devil"
The NOI teaches that the white race, as a product of Yakub's experiments, is inherently degenerate, sub-human, and prone to violence and deceit—qualities encapsulated by the term "devil." This narrative forms the basis for the NOI's critique of white supremacy and its call for racial separatism.
Secret Knowledge
The NOI claims that senior white Freemasons possess knowledge of the white race's origins through Yakub's experiments. This alleged secret knowledge is presented as evidence of a long-standing conspiracy by the white establishment to maintain dominance over people of color.
Apocalyptic Visions
The Mother Plane
Central to NOI eschatology is the "Mother Plane," a massive spaceship described as half a mile in diameter, housing Allah and his scientists. This vessel is believed to be the Merkabah mentioned in the Book of Ezekiel. Smaller "baby planes" are said to dock within it and travel to Earth, explaining UFO sightings.
The Coming Apocalypse
The NOI teaches that the current era of white rule is ending, culminating in an apocalypse. This event involves the Mother Plane transporting the righteous, followed by baby planes burying bombs to destroy the existing world order. The Earth will then undergo a lengthy period of burning and cooling before a new black paradise is established.
Imminent End Times
Various predictions have been made regarding the timing of the apocalypse, with leaders suggesting events like the Gulf War or specific years as triggers. The NOI views modern space exploration and defense initiatives as futile attempts by the white elite to escape the prophesied arrival of the Mother Plane.
Black Nationalism and Separatism
Unity and Identity
Black unity is a foundational principle of the NOI ideology. The organization strives to instill a positive self-identity in African Americans, counteracting internalized notions of white superiority. The NOI promotes a cosmology where the black race is considered superior and divinely chosen.
Call for a Separate Nation
The NOI advocates for Black separatism, rejecting racial integration. It calls for the establishment of a sovereign African American nation-state, either within the United States or elsewhere, with reparations for centuries of slavery and unpaid labor. This stance contrasts with the non-violent integrationist approach of the mainstream Civil Rights Movement.
Diaspora Focus
While acknowledging ties to Africa, the NOI's primary focus is on the African diaspora in the Americas. Elijah Muhammad emphasized the responsibility towards African Americans in North America, viewing the continent of Africa itself as less significant than the diaspora's immediate struggle for liberation and self-determination.
Gender Roles and Family
Patriarchal Structure
The NOI adheres to conservative and patriarchal gender roles, emphasizing the restoration of black manhood and the importance of a male family head. Men are expected to be economic providers, while women are encouraged to be homemakers and caretakers, preserving modesty through specific dress codes.
Women's Roles and Leadership
While promoting traditional roles, the NOI has seen women rise to significant positions, including ministers and leaders in educational and business sectors. Clara Muhammad notably led the organization during Elijah Muhammad's imprisonment. The Muslim Girls Training group also plays a key role in socializing young women within the NOI framework.
Family and Marriage
Emphasis is placed on the nuclear family unit, with a preference for marriages between black members. While divorce is discouraged, it is not forbidden. The organization is critical of birth control methods, viewing them as a means to lower the black birthrate, though it permits abortion under specific circumstances.
Sexuality and Morality
Condemnation of Same-Sex Relationships
The Nation of Islam strictly condemns same-sex relationships as immoral. This stance has led to accusations of homophobia, particularly concerning the exclusion of gay men from events like the Million Man March. The organization promotes heterosexual monogamy and discourages premarital sexual activity.
Interracial Relationships
The NOI discourages relationships between black members and white individuals, believing such unions emasculate black men and perpetuate racial division. While marriages to other people of color (Native Americans, Latinos) are accepted, interracial relationships with whites are considered taboo.
Controversial Statements
Certain NOI figures, including Louis Farrakhan and Khalid Abdul Muhammad, have made controversial statements, including accusations of antisemitism and conspiracy theories linking Jewish people to societal ills and the drug trade. These statements have drawn significant criticism from various civil rights and religious organizations.
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "Nation Of Islam" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
- Soumahoro 2007, p. 39; Fishman & Soage 2013, pp. 59, 60.
- McCutcheon 2013b, p. 573; Potorti 2017, p. 68.
- Tinaz 2000, p. 45; Tinaz 2006, p. 151.
- Barnett 2006, p. 891; Izadi et al. 2020, p. 165.
- Wojcik 2003, p. 280; Finley 2022, p. 175.
- Austin 2003, p. 55; Gibson & Karim 2014, p. 34.
- Tinaz 1996, p. 193; Curtis IV 2016, p. 13.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 109, 322; Akom 2003, p. 311; Barnett 2006, p. 881.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 54, 181; Austin 2003, p. 59; Barnett 2006, p. 882; Soumahoro 2007, p. 40.
- Gardell 1996, p. 233; McCutcheon 2013b, p. 574.
- Lincoln 1961, p. iv; Tinaz 1996, p. 193; Fishman & Soage 2013, p. 62.
- Gardell 1996, p. 36; Tinaz 2000, p. 46; Tinaz 2006, p. 153.
- Barrett 2001, p. 252; Fishman & Soage 2013, p. 64; Berg 2005, p. 700.
- Gardell 1996, p. 106; Curtis IV 2006, p. 10.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 188, 195; Curtis IV 2006, p. 10; Fishman & Soage 2013, p. 62.
- Gardell 1996, p. 32; Gibson 2012, p. 2.
- Gardell 1996, p. 35; Gibson 2012, p. 1.
- Gardell 1996, p. 35; Tinaz 2006, p. 153.
- Tsoukalas 2004, p. 451; Barnett 2006, p. 879; Acevado, Ordner & Thompson 2010, p. 138.
- Allen 1996, p. 7; Gardell 1996, p. 31; Tinaz 1996, p. 193.
- Allen 1996, p. 7; Gardell 1996, p. 37; Tinaz 1996, p. 193; Berg 2005, p. 689.
- Gardell 1996, p. 37; Tinaz 1996, pp. 193â194.
- Soumahoro 2007, p. 40; Gibson 2012, p. 17; Finley 2022, p. 63.
- Soumahoro 2007, p. 40; Gibson 2012, p. 17; Gibson & Karim 2014, p. 4; Finley 2022, p. 63.
- Gardell 1996, p. 53; Deutsch 2000, p. 93.
- Gardell 1996, p. 53; Gibson 2012, p. 23.
- Lincoln 1961, p. 11; Gibson 2012, p. 18.
- Lincoln 1961, p. 21; Gibson & Karim 2014, p. 3.
- Lincoln 1961, p. 14; Gardell 1996, p. 54.
- Lincoln 1961, p. 13; Gardell 1996, p. 54.
- Lincoln 1961, p. 14; Gardell 1996, pp. 54â55; Tinaz 1996, p. 195; Gibson 2012, p. 19.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 48â49; Deutsch 2000, p. 93.
- Lincoln 1961, p. 15; Gardell 1996, p. 54.
- Gardell 1996, p. 55; Gibson 2012, pp. 19â20; Boaz 2018, p. 17.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 55â56; Boaz 2018, pp. 23â24.
- Lincoln 1961, p. 15; Gardell 1996, p. 58; Tinaz 1996, p. 195.
- Gardell 1996, p. 58; Tinaz 1996, p. 195; Fishman & Soage 2013, p. 60.
- Lincoln 1961, p. 16; Allen 1996, p. 10; Gardell 1996, p. 58; Tinaz 1996, p. 195.
- Lincoln 1961, p. 16; Gardell 1996, p. 58; Tinaz 1996, p. 195.
- Gardell 1996, p. 69; Colley 2014, p. 401.
- Gardell 1996, p. 70; Colley 2014, p. 401.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 58â59, 70â71; Colley 2014, p. 401; Vaught 2017, pp. 49â50.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 59, 71; Gibson & Karim 2014, p. 9.
- Gibson & Karim 2014, p. 9; Finley 2022, p. 185.
- Allen 1996, p. 12; Gibson & Karim 2014, p. 13.
- Curtis IV 2002, p. 181; Curtis IV 2006, p. 4; Curtis IV 2016, p. 17.
- Curtis IV 2002, p. 182; Curtis IV 2016, p. 17.
- Allen 1996, p. 3; Gardell 1996, p. 224.
- Allen 1996, p. 11; Gardell 1996, p. 65; Tinaz 1996, p. 197; Taylor 2005, pp. 59â60.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 63â64; Lee 1996, p. 39; Haywood 2017, pp. 9, 10.
- Gardell 1996, p. 66; Gibson & Karim 2014, p. 15.
- Gardell 1996, p. 80; Tinaz 1996, p. 199; Fishman & Soage 2013, p. 63.
- Allen 1996, p. 14; Gardell 1996, p. 80; Lee 1996, p. 42.
- Gardell 1996, p. 76; Tinaz 1996, p. 199.
- Allen 1996, pp. 15â16; Gardell 1996, p. 189.
- Allen 1996, p. 16; Gardell 1996, p. 101; Gibson 2012, p. 71; Curtis IV 2016, p. 24.
- Gardell 1996, p. 102; Lee 1996, p. 58; Gibson 2012, pp. 72â74.
- Lee 1996, p. 61; Curtis IV 2016, p. 25.
- Allen 1996, p. 16; Tinaz 1996, p. 199; Gibson 2012, pp. 76â77; Curtis IV 2016, p. 25.
- Allen 1996, p. 16; Gardell 1996, pp. 110â111; Tinaz 1996, p. 200.
- Allen 1996, p. 16; Gardell 1996, p. 109.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 111â112; Fishman & Soage 2013, p. 61.
- Allen 1996, p. 16; Gardell 1996, p. 109; Gibson 2012, p. 78; Fishman & Soage 2013, p. 61.
- Lee 1996, p. 66; Finley 2022, pp. 110, 117.
- Gardell 1996, p. 106; Berg 2005, pp. 696â697.
- Gardell 1996, p. 113; Tinaz 1996, pp. 200â201.
- Allen 1996, p. 18; Gardell 1996, p. 113.
- Gardell 1996, p. 123; Gibson 2012, pp. 85â86; Curtis IV 2016, p. 25; Finley 2022, p. 132.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 119â120; Finley 2022, p. 132.
- Lee 1996, p. 65; Gibson 2012, p. 81.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 141â142; Finley 2022, p. 155.
- Allen 1996, p. 20; Gardell 1996, p. 138; Gibson 2012, p. 108.
- Gardell 1996, p. 140; Gibson 2012, p. 88.
- Allen 1996, p. 18; Gardell 1996, p. 137.
- Gardell 1996, p. 142; Gibson 2012, pp. 97â98.
- Gardell 1996, p. 294; Gibson 2012, p. 103.
- Barnett 2006, p. 876; Soumahoro 2007, p. 40.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 145, 171; Tsoukalas 2004, p. 455; Fishman & Soage 2013, p. 62.
- Gardell 1996, p. 171; Finley 2022, p. 41.
- Keener & Usry 2005, p. 175; Fishman & Soage 2013, p. 64; Curtis IV 2016, p. 17.
- Gardell 1996, p. 233; Keener & Usry 2005, p. 175.
- Curtis IV 2006, p. 11; Finley 2022, pp. 40â41.
- Allen 1996, p. 9; Curtis IV 2016, p. 13.
- Gardell 1996, p. 144; Finley 2022, pp. 22â23.
- Gardell 1996, p. 144; Finley 2022, p. 23.
- Allen 1996, p. 10; Gardell 1996, p. 144.
- Allen 1996, p. 10; Austin 2003, p. 56; Soumahoro 2007, p. 42.
- Gardell 1996, p. 145; Fishman & Soage 2013, p. 63; Finley 2022, p. 25.
- Curtis IV 2016, p. 14; Finley 2022, p. 26.
- Austin 2003, p. 57; Barnett 2006, p. 878.
- Gardell 1996, p. 7; Austin 2003, p. 57.
- Gardell 1996, p. 147; Curtis IV 2016, p. 15.
- Gardell 1996, p. 147; Curtis IV 2016, p. 15; Finley 2022, p. 30.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 148â149; Knight 2000, p. 165.
- Gardell 1996, p. 148; Tsoukalas 2004, p. 454; Curtis IV 2016, p. 22; Finley 2022, p. 43.
- Taylor 2005, p. 61; Curtis IV 2016, p. 16.
- Gardell 1996, p. 151; Berg 2005, p. 692; Finley 2022, p. 32.
- Gardell 1996, p. 152; Deutsch 2000, p. 108.
- Gardell 1996, p. 152; Finley 2022, p. 32.
- Gardell 1996, p. 235; Curtis IV 2016, p. 16; Finley 2022, p. 32.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 59, 148; Tinaz 1996, p. 197; Acevado, Ordner & Thompson 2010, p. 139.
- Curtis IV 2006, p. 11; Potorti 2017, p. 69.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 59, 16; Fishman & Soage 2013, p. 63; Curtis IV 2016, p. 16.
- Tinaz 2006, p. 160; Acevado, Ordner & Thompson 2010, p. 140; Colley 2014, p. 400.
- Barnett 2006, p. 882; Soumahoro 2007, p. 46; Finley 2022, pp. 34, 44.
- Gardell 1996, p. 60; Soumahoro 2007, p. 41.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 232â233; Barrett 2001, p. 253; Perry & Schweitzer 2002, pp. 213â214.
- Gardell 1996, p. 253; Deutsch 2000, p. 111; Gibson 2012, p. 95.
- Allen 1996, p. 8; Lee 1996, p. 2; Wojcik 2003, p. 280; Barnett 2006, p. 874.
- Gardell 1996, p. 158; Taylor 2005, p. 63; Finley 2022, p. 68.
- Curtis IV 2016, p. 20; Finley 2022, p. 68.
- Gardell 1996, p. 158; Finley 2022, p. 68.
- Gardell 1996, p. 158; Barrett 2001, p. 253; Tsoukalas 2004, p. 456; Taylor 2005, p. 57.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 159, 164; Curtis IV 2016, pp. 19â20.
- Gardell 1996, p. 159; Finley 2022, p. 71.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 59, 164; Tsoukalas 2004, p. 456.
- Lee 1996, p. 35; Tsoukalas 2004, p. 456; Finley 2022, p. 69.
- Austin 2003, p. 58; Acevado, Ordner & Thompson 2010, p. 142; Boaz 2018, p. 24.
- Allen 1996, p. 4; Gardell 1996, p. 60; Curtis IV 2006, p. 2; Soumahoro 2007, p. 40.
- Acevado, Ordner & Thompson 2010, p. 145; Haywood 2017, p. 12.
- Curtis IV 2006, p. 3; McCutcheon 2013, p. 65.
- Acevado, Ordner & Thompson 2010, p. 147; Finley 2022, p. 43.
- Barrett 2001, p. 252; Jeffries 2019, p. 2.
- Gardell 1996, p. 60; McCutcheon 2013, p. 62.
- Lee 1996, p. 32; Finley 2022, p. 30.
- Soumahoro 2007, p. 42; Barnett 2006, p. 882.
- Austin 2003, p. 65; Soumahoro 2007, p. 42.
- Gardell 1996, p. 330; Barnett 2006, p. 879; Turman 2015, p. 140.
- Gardell 1996, p. 330; Barnett 2006, p. 879; Gibson & Karim 2014, p. 30-31.
- Gardell 1996, p. 330; West 1996, p. 42; Barnett 2006, p. 879; Colley 2014, p. 409.
- Gibson 2012, p. 104; Gibson 2017, p. 42.
- Gibson 2012, p. 104; Gibson & Karim 2014, p. 19.
- Gibson 2016, p. 96; Gibson 2017, p. 38.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 61, 335; Lee 1996, p. 30.
- Gibson 2016, pp. 98â99; Gibson 2017, p. 38.
- Lee 1996, p. 30; Gibson 2017, p. 33.
- Gardell 1996, p. 335; Gibson 2012, p. 103; Curtis IV 2016, p. 16; Finley 2022, p. 59.
- Gardell 1996, p. 335; Gibson 2012, p. 103.
- Gardell 1996, p. 336; Barnett 2006, p. 879; Finley 2022, p. 56.
- Curtis IV 2006, p. 3; Curtis IV 2016, p. 10.
- Gardell 1996, p. 191; Barnett 2006, p. 879.
- Gardell 1996, p. 63; Fishman & Soage 2013, p. 60.
- Deutsch 2000, p. 112; White Jr. 2001, p. 202.
- Gardell 1996, p. 54; Barnett 2006, p. 886.
- Gardell 1996, p. 64; Gibson & Karim 2014, p. 6.
- Colley 2014, p. 405; Curtis IV 2016, p. 17.
- Lincoln 1961, p. 17; Curtis IV 2016, p. 18.
- Lincoln 1961, p. 17; Gardell 1996, p. 61; Lee 1996, p. 30.
- Gardell 1996, p. 61; Barnett 2006, p. 889; Finley 2022, p. 55.
- Gardell 1996, p. 61; Finley 2022, p. 54.
- Barnett 2006, p. 889; Gibson & Karim 2014, p. 12; Finley 2022, p. 54.
- Barnett 2006, p. 877; McCutcheon 2013b, p. 574.
- Gardell 1996, p. 62; Deutsch 2000, p. 96.
- Lee 1996, p. 30; Deutsch 2000, p. 96.
- Curtis IV 2016, p. 18; Potorti 2017, p. 83.
- Gardell 1996, p. 62; Curtis IV 2016, p. 18.
- Gardell 1996, p. 61; McCutcheon 2013b, p. 575; Colley 2014, p. 400; Curtis IV 2016, p. 18.
- Gardell 1996, p. 61; Barnett 2006, p. 883; Colley 2014, p. 400.
- Gardell 1996, p. 304; Tinaz 1996, pp. 202â203.
- Gardell 1996, p. 319; Tinaz 1996, p. 201.
- Gardell 1996, p. 321; Barnett 2006, p. 884.
- McCutcheon 2013, p. 62; McCutcheon 2013b, p. 572.
- McCutcheon 2013, p. 65; McCutcheon 2013b, p. 575.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 61, 323; Barnett 2006, p. 880.
- Gardell 1996, p. 323; Barnett 2006, p. 880.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 61, 324; Barnett 2006, p. 880.
- Curtis IV 2006, p. 12; Finley 2022, p. 79.
- Allen 1996, p. 4; Gardell 1996, p. 250; Gibson 2012, p. 89.
- Barnett 2006, p. 891; Curtis IV 2016, p. 17.
- Curtis IV 2002, p. 174; Finley 2022, p. 55.
- Curtis IV 2002, p. 174; Finley 2022, p. 57.
- Curtis IV 2006, p. 7; Izadi et al. 2020, pp. 149â150.
- Austin 2003, p. 62; Vaught 2017, p. 48.
- Austin 2003, p. 62; Paisley 2009, p. 23.
- Tinaz 1996, p. 198; Austin 2003, p. 64; Izadi et al. 2020, p. 138.
- Fishman & Soage 2013, p. 64; Izadi et al. 2020, p. 139.
- Allen 1996, p. 15; Gardell 1996, p. 207; Fishman & Soage 2013, p. 66; Jeffries 2019, p. 6.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 207, 319â320; Tinaz 1996, p. 201.
- Izadi et al. 2020, p. 138; Finley 2022, p. 153.
- Woodford 1996, p. 37; Izadi et al. 2020, p. 141.
- Allen 1996, p. 5; Gardell 1996, pp. 271â272.
- Allen 1996, p. 5; Gardell 1996, p. 274.
- Allen 1996, p. 6; Gardell 1996, p. 277.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 278â279; Knight 2000, p. 164.
- Gibson & Karim 2014, p. 1; Gibson 2017, p. 39.
- Gibson 2012, pp. 104â105; Gibson & Karim 2014, p. 20.
- Gardell 1996, p. 115; Izadi et al. 2020, p. 140.
- Gardell 1996, p. 306; Akom 2003, p. 311.
- Curtis IV 2002, p. 181; Colley 2014, pp. 393â394.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 307â308; Colley 2014, pp. 404â405.
- Gardell 1996, pp. 226â227; Palmer 2010, pp. 13â14.
- Gardell 1996, p. 5; Akom 2003, pp. 308â309.
- Curtis IV 2002, p. 182; Curtis IV 2006, p. 4.
- Gibson 2012, p. 97; Izadi et al. 2020, p. 159.
- Gardell 1996, p. 269; Finley 2022, p. 156.
- Gardell 1996, p. 188; Curtis IV 2002, pp. 182â183; Austin 2003, p. 64.
- Gardell 1996, p. 188; Curtis IV 2006, p. 5.
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Academic Disclaimer
Important Notice
This document was generated by an AI and is intended for educational and informational purposes only. The content is derived from publicly available data and aims to present a comprehensive overview suitable for advanced academic study. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy and adherence to the source material, the information may not be exhaustive or reflect the most current perspectives.
This is not a statement of endorsement or validation. The information provided herein is not a substitute for critical analysis, independent research, or consultation with qualified scholars or experts in religious studies, sociology, or history. Readers are encouraged to consult primary sources and diverse academic perspectives for a nuanced understanding of the subject matter.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.