This is an academic explainer based on the Wikipedia article on Organicism. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

The Organic Paradigm

An academic exploration of organicism, a philosophical concept viewing the universe and societies as living organisms, from ancient philosophy to modern scientific thought.

What is Organicism? ๐Ÿ‘‡ Explore Philosophical Roots ๐Ÿฆ‰

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
๐ŸŽฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ŸŽฎ

The Concept of Organicism

Defining Organicism

Organicism is a philosophical position asserting that the universe and its constituent parts, including human societies, should be understood as living entities, analogous to biological organisms.[1][2] Central to this view is the idea that the elements within such systems are not static entities but dynamic components engaged in a continuous interplay, contributing to a constantly evolving whole.[3]

Distinguishing from Related Concepts

While related to holism, organicism predates it and is more specific in its analogy to living organisms. It fundamentally rejects reductionism, which explains systems solely by their smallest parts. Instead, organicism emphasizes both bottom-up and top-down causality, recognizing the influence of the whole on its parts and vice versa.[5] It also diverges from vitalism by not positing a distinct vital force, focusing instead on the inherent organizational principles of living systems.[13]

Foundational Tenet

Regarded as a cornerstone of natural philosophy, organicism has persisted as a significant current in intellectual thought since the early 17th century, coexisting with reductionist and mechanistic perspectives.[6][7] Its emphasis on interconnectedness and dynamic processes continues to inform various fields of inquiry.

Historical Roots

Ancient Origins

Scholars generally trace the origins of organicism to Ancient Athens. Plato, in his dialogues Philebus and Timaeus, presented the universe as an intelligent, living entity, an early articulation of organicist thought.[1] This perspective viewed the cosmos not as a mere collection of inert objects but as a unified, animated whole.

Kantian Revival and Romanticism

Immanuel Kant significantly contributed to a resurgence of organicist ideas in the late 18th century. He highlighted the intrinsic interconnectedness of an organism's parts and the concept of circular causality within these systems.[2] During the German Romanticism movement, thinkers like Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schelling integrated organicist principles into the nascent field of biology, viewing life as a fundamental organizing force.[8]

Organicism in Philosophical Discourse

Rejection of Mechanism

Philosophically, organicism stands in opposition to mechanism and reductionism. It posits that systems, particularly living ones, possess emergent properties and organizational principles that cannot be fully explained by analyzing their constituent parts in isolation.[5] This perspective emphasizes the holistic nature of reality, where the whole is more than the sum of its parts.

Beyond Vitalism

While sharing a rejection of purely mechanistic explanations with vitalism, organicism distinguishes itself by not invoking a separate, non-physical vital force. Instead, it focuses on the inherent organizational complexity and dynamic interactions within systems as the basis for life and behavior.[13]

Causality and Relations

Organicism acknowledges both bottom-up and top-down causation, where the overall system can influence the behavior of its parts. This contrasts with strict reductionism, which primarily focuses on bottom-up explanations. The emphasis on relations between parts, rather than just the parts themselves, is a key feature, distinguishing it from earlier substance-based philosophies.[16]

Organicism in the Life Sciences

Modern Biological Perspectives

In contemporary biology, organicism highlights the importance of self-organizing properties and the intricate organization of organisms, moving beyond a purely reductionist focus on molecular components.[9] This perspective has influenced movements like the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, which seeks a more comprehensive understanding of evolutionary processes.[11][12]

The Theoretical Biology Club

In the 1930s, figures like Joseph Henry Woodger and Joseph Needham formed the Theoretical Biology Club. This group advocated for an organismic approach, challenging mechanistic philosophy, reductionism, and gene-centric views of evolution, often drawing inspiration from Alfred North Whitehead's philosophy.[36][37]

Relational Biology

Robert Rosen, a key proponent of relational biology, provided a formal, mathematical framework for understanding life based on irreducible causal relations, further developing the organicist perspective on biological systems.[35]

Organicism in Theological Thought

Unity and Diversity

In the 19th century, organicism influenced dogmatic theology, notably in the work of Herman Bavinck. He conceptualized reality as possessing an organic unity of diversity, rooted in the Trinity, reflecting a worldview where God and the world are intrinsically connected.[17]

Faith and Church

Norwegian theologian Gisle Johnson applied organicist language to faith and the church, viewing their development as an "organic development," akin to a growing plant. He saw systematic theology itself as an organism, requiring explication and reproduction of faith-consciousness.[18]

Martensen's Definition

Hans Lassen Martensen defined theological organicism by contrasting living objects with lifeless, mechanical ones. He argued that in organic systems, the whole can exist meaningfully even without all parts being perfectly understood, a characteristic applicable to eternal life and the gospel.[19]

Organicism in Society and Politics

Societal Analogy

In sociology and political thought, organicism views human society as analogous to a biological organism, with individuals functioning like cells. This perspective was articulated by thinkers such as Alfred Espinas, Paul von Lilienfeld, Albert Schรคffle, and Herbert Spencer.[20]

Conservative Thought

Prominent conservative thinkers like Edmund Burke, G.W.F. Hegel, and Adam Mรผller embraced an organic view of society. This tradition also includes the "Tory Radicalism" of Carlyle, Ruskin, and Coleridge, emphasizing tradition, hierarchy, and the inherent structure of social life.[21][22][23]

Far-Right Ideologies

Organicism has been identified as a core element of far-right political thought. Philosophers like Johann Gottlieb Fichte influenced Nazi ideology, which viewed the state as a living organism and promoted a Vรถlkisch nationalism based on organic racial unity.[27][29][32] This perspective often entails a rejection of universalism in favor of group identity and homogeneity.

Organicism in Ecology

Ecosystems as Organisms

In ecology, "organicism" or "organismic" perspectives conceptualize populations and ecological communities as integrated wholes, akin to individual organisms.[42][43] This view sometimes overlaps with holism, emphasizing the systemic properties of ecological interactions.

Gaia Theory

Early iterations of Gaia theory adopted an explicitly organicist stance, conceptualizing the Earth as a single, self-regulating living system rather than merely a collection of mechanical components.[45] This perspective highlights the planet's complex feedback loops and emergent properties.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Organicism" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about organicism while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

References

References

  1.  Gilbert, S. F., and S. Sarkar. 2000. "Embracing Complexity: Organicism for the 21st Century." Develop Dynam 219: 1รขย€ย“9.
  2.  Charles Wolfe. HOLISM, ORGANICISM AND THE RISK OF BIOCHAUVINISM. Verifiche. Rivista di scienze umana, 2014
  3.  Fritjof Capra. The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. Anchor Books Doubleday, 1996.
  4.  What The Bleep Do We Know รขย€ย“ Down The Rabbit Hole. Samuel Goldwyn Films. Roadside attractions. Documentary film, Drama. 3 February 2006.
  5.  Daniela Barberis, "In search of an object: organicist sociology and the reality of society in fin-de-siรƒยจcle France", History of the Human Sciences, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2003. Page 54.
  6.  Rosen, R. 1991. "Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry Into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life". Columbia University Press, New York.
  7.  Reconciling science and religion: the debate in early-twentieth-century Britain, 2001, Peter J. Bowler
  8.  A history of molecular biology, Michel Morange, Matthew Cobb, 2000, p. 91
  9.  Greater than the parts: holism in biomedicine, 1920รขย€ย“1950, Christopher Lawrence, George Weisz, Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 12
  10.  Cf. Trepl, Ludwig & Voigt, Annette 2011: The classical holism-reductionism debate in ecology. In: Schwarz, Astrid/ Jax, Kurt (Hg.): Ecology Revisited. Reflecting on Concepts, Advancing Science. Dordrecht, Springer: 45รขย€ย“83.
A full list of references for this article are available at the Organicism Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Academic Disclaimer

Important Considerations

This document has been generated by an AI, synthesizing information from provided sources to offer an academic overview of organicism. While striving for accuracy and adherence to the source material, it is intended for educational and informational purposes only.

This is not a substitute for scholarly research or expert consultation. The interpretations and connections presented are based on the AI's analysis of the provided text. Readers are encouraged to consult primary sources and engage in critical evaluation of the concepts discussed. Philosophical and political ideas, particularly those with historical and ideological dimensions, require nuanced understanding that extends beyond this summary.

The creators of this content are not responsible for any interpretations, omissions, or actions taken based on the information presented herein.