The District's Ballot
An analytical exploration of electoral patterns and political representation in the nation's capital, detailing historical presidential election results in Washington D.C.
Explore Overview ๐ View Election Data ๐Dive in with Flashcard Learning!
๐ฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ฎ
Overview
Electoral Participation
Following the ratification of the Twenty-third Amendment to the Constitution in 1961, the District of Columbia has participated in sixteen presidential elections. This amendment stipulates that the District's electoral vote allocation cannot exceed that of the least populous state, resulting in a consistent allocation of three electoral votes for each election since its enactment.
Voting Trends
The District of Columbia exhibits a pronounced dominance of the Democratic Party in its political landscape. Across all sixteen presidential elections since 1964, the District has consistently favored the Democratic candidate, with victory margins never falling below 56.5 percentage points. In nine of these sixteen contests, the District's electoral votes were cast for the candidate who ultimately lost the national election.
Representation and Protest
In the 2000 presidential election, an elector from the District, Barbara Lett-Simmons, abstained from casting her vote as a protest against the District's lack of full congressional representation. Contemporary movements advocating for statehood in the District of Columbia continue to press for its admission as a state, reflecting ongoing debates about political equity.
Historical Context
Constitutional Foundation
The District of Columbia's participation in presidential elections is rooted in the Twenty-third Amendment, ratified in 1961. This amendment granted the District electors in the Electoral College, treating it similarly to a state for presidential election purposes, albeit with a cap on its electoral vote count equivalent to the least populous state.
Consistent Democratic Support
Since its first presidential election participation in 1964, the District has voted overwhelmingly for the Democratic nominee in every election. This consistent pattern underscores the District's strong partisan alignment, with significant margins of victory for Democratic candidates in each contest.
Advocacy for Representation
The District's unique political status, lacking voting representation in Congress, has been a recurring theme. The symbolic abstention of an elector in 2000 and the persistent statehood movements highlight the ongoing efforts to achieve full political parity for the District's residents.
Election Data
Summary Statistics
The District of Columbia has participated in 16 presidential elections since 1964. In all these elections, the Democratic candidate has secured the District's electoral votes. The Republican candidate has received zero electoral votes from the District, and no votes have been cast for other candidates.
1964 Election
Winner: Lyndon B. Johnson (D)
Votes: 169,976
Percentage: 85.5%
Runner-up: Barry Goldwater (R)
Votes: 28,801
Percentage: 14.5%
Electoral Votes: 3
1968 Election
Winner: Hubert Humphrey (D)
Votes: 139,566
Percentage: 81.82%
Runner-up: Richard Nixon (R)
Votes: 31,012
Percentage: 18.18%
Electoral Votes: 3
1972 Election
Winner: George McGovern (D)
Votes: 127,627
Percentage: 78.1%
Runner-up: Richard Nixon (R)
Votes: 35,226
Percentage: 21.56%
Other: Linda Jenness (SW)
Votes: 316
Percentage: 0.19%
Electoral Votes: 3
1976 Election
Winner: Jimmy Carter (D)
Votes: 137,818
Percentage: 81.63%
Runner-up: Gerald Ford (R)
Votes: 27,873
Percentage: 16.51%
Other: Peter Camejo (SW)
Votes: 545
Percentage: 0.32%
Electoral Votes: 3
1980 Election
Winner: Jimmy Carter (D)
Votes: 130,231
Percentage: 74.32%
Runner-up: Ronald Reagan (R)
Votes: 23,313
Percentage: 13.3%
Other: John B. Anderson (I)
Votes: 16,131
Percentage: 9.21%
Electoral Votes: 3
1984 Election
Winner: Walter Mondale (D)
Votes: 180,408
Percentage: 85.38%
Runner-up: Ronald Reagan (R)
Votes: 29,009
Percentage: 13.73%
Other: David Bergland (LI)
Votes: 279
Percentage: 0.13%
Electoral Votes: 3
1988 Election
Winner: Michael Dukakis (D)
Votes: 159,407
Percentage: 82.65%
Runner-up: George H. W. Bush (R)
Votes: 27,590
Percentage: 14.3%
Other: Lenora Fulani (NA)
Votes: 2,901
Percentage: 1.5%
Electoral Votes: 3
1992 Election
Winner: Bill Clinton (D)
Votes: 192,619
Percentage: 84.64%
Runner-up: George H. W. Bush (R)
Votes: 20,698
Percentage: 9.1%
Other: Ross Perot (I)
Votes: 9,681
Percentage: 4.25%
Electoral Votes: 3
1996 Election
Winner: Bill Clinton (D)
Votes: 158,220
Percentage: 85.19%
Runner-up: Bob Dole (R)
Votes: 17,339
Percentage: 9.34%
Other: Ralph Nader (G)
Votes: 4,780
Percentage: 2.57%
Electoral Votes: 3
2000 Election
Winner: Al Gore (D)
Votes: 171,923
Percentage: 85.16%
Runner-up: George W. Bush (R)
Votes: 18,073
Percentage: 8.95%
Other: Ralph Nader (G)
Votes: 10,576
Percentage: 5.24%
Electoral Votes: 2 (due to elector abstention)
2004 Election
Winner: John Kerry (D)
Votes: 202,970
Percentage: 89.18%
Runner-up: George W. Bush (R)
Votes: 21,256
Percentage: 9.34%
Other: Ralph Nader (I)
Votes: 1,485
Percentage: 0.65%
Electoral Votes: 3
2008 Election
Winner: Barack Obama (D)
Votes: 245,800
Percentage: 92.46%
Runner-up: John McCain (R)
Votes: 17,367
Percentage: 6.53%
Other: Ralph Nader (I)
Votes: 1,138
Percentage: 0.43%
Electoral Votes: 3
2012 Election
Winner: Barack Obama (D)
Votes: 267,070
Percentage: 90.91%
Runner-up: Mitt Romney (R)
Votes: 21,381
Percentage: 7.28%
Other: Jill Stein (G)
Votes: 2,458
Percentage: 0.84%
Electoral Votes: 3
2016 Election
Winner: Hillary Clinton (D)
Votes: 282,830
Percentage: 90.86%
Runner-up: Donald Trump (R)
Votes: 12,723
Percentage: 4.09%
Other: Gary Johnson (LI)
Votes: 4,906
Percentage: 1.58%
Electoral Votes: 3
2020 Election
Winner: Joe Biden (D)
Votes: 317,323
Percentage: 92.15%
Runner-up: Donald Trump (R)
Votes: 18,586
Percentage: 5.4%
Other: Jo Jorgensen (LI)
Votes: 2,036
Percentage: 0.59%
Electoral Votes: 3
2024 Election
Winner: Kamala Harris (D)
Votes: 294,185
Percentage: 90.28%
Runner-up: Donald Trump (R)
Votes: 21,076
Percentage: 6.47%
Other: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (I)
Votes: 2,778
Percentage: 0.85%
Electoral Votes: 3
Electoral Analysis
Margin of Victory
The District of Columbia consistently delivers substantial victory margins for the Democratic Party in presidential elections. The smallest margin observed since 1964 was 56.5 percentage points in 1964, while the largest was 92.46 percentage points in 2008. This reflects a strong and stable partisan preference.
Winner vs. District Vote
In 9 out of the 16 elections analyzed, the District of Columbia's preferred candidate (the Democratic nominee) was not the national winner. This phenomenon, where the District's electoral votes went to the losing presidential candidate, highlights the divergence between the District's political leanings and the national electoral outcome.
Third-Party Influence
While the Democratic candidate consistently wins the District, third-party candidates have occasionally garnered notable vote shares. For instance, in 2000, Ralph Nader received over 10,000 votes, and in 2016, Gary Johnson secured nearly 5,000 votes. This indicates a segment of the electorate that may not align with either major party.
Political Landscape
Party Strength
The Democratic Party holds a commanding majority in voter registration and electoral performance within the District of Columbia. This overwhelming support is a defining characteristic of the District's political identity, shaping its representation and policy priorities.
Statehood Movement
The District's lack of voting representation in the U.S. Congress fuels a persistent statehood movement. Advocates argue that granting statehood would rectify this democratic deficit, providing full political rights to the District's residents. Referendums supporting statehood have passed with significant majorities.
National Popular Vote
The District of Columbia is a signatory to the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. This agreement aims to ensure the presidency is awarded to the candidate who wins the national popular vote, regardless of the Electoral College outcome. The compact's activation is contingent upon ratification by a sufficient number of states.
Civic Engagement
The Twenty-third Amendment
Ratified in 1961, the Twenty-third Amendment was pivotal, granting the District of Columbia electoral votes for presidential elections. This amendment recognized the civic rights of District residents to participate in the election of the President and Vice President, albeit with limitations on the number of electors.
Voter Turnout
Voter turnout in the District of Columbia is generally robust, reflecting a high level of civic engagement among its residents. The consistent participation underscores the importance District voters place on presidential elections, even within a predictable partisan outcome.
Electoral Protests
The District's unique political status has occasionally led to symbolic acts of protest related to electoral processes. The abstention of an elector in 2000 serves as a notable example, drawing attention to the ongoing debate regarding the District's representation in the federal government.
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "United States Presidential Elections In The District Of Columbia" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
- Abstention from one elector[33]
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.
This is not political advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional political analysis or consultation. Always refer to official election results and consult with qualified professionals for in-depth political insights. Never disregard professional advice because of something you have read on this website.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.