Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



District of Columbia Presidential Election History: Voting Patterns and the 23rd Amendment

At a Glance

Title: District of Columbia Presidential Election History: Voting Patterns and the 23rd Amendment

Total Categories: 7

Category Stats

  • The Twenty-Third Amendment: Foundation and Framework: 2 flashcards, 4 questions
  • Electoral Mechanics: D.C.'s Representation: 3 flashcards, 5 questions
  • Historical Voting Trends: Democratic Dominance: 10 flashcards, 9 questions
  • Divergence from National Results: 4 flashcards, 8 questions
  • Key Presidential Elections: Case Studies: 19 flashcards, 18 questions
  • Political Status and Advocacy: 4 flashcards, 5 questions
  • Interpreting Election Data: Symbols and Notes: 9 flashcards, 9 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 51
  • True/False Questions: 30
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 28
  • Total Questions: 58

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about District of Columbia Presidential Election History: Voting Patterns and the 23rd Amendment

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "United States presidential elections in the District of Columbia" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: District of Columbia Presidential Election History: Voting Patterns and the 23rd Amendment

Study Guide: District of Columbia Presidential Election History: Voting Patterns and the 23rd Amendment

The Twenty-Third Amendment: Foundation and Framework

The Twenty-third Amendment granted the District of Columbia the right to vote in all federal elections.

Answer: False

The Twenty-third Amendment specifically grants the District of Columbia the right to participate in *presidential* elections, not all federal elections.

Related Concepts:

  • What constitutional amendment granted the District of Columbia the right to participate in presidential elections, and when was it enacted?: The Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1961, granted the District of Columbia the right to participate in presidential elections. This amendment allows the District to appoint electors, subject to specific limitations.

The Twenty-third Amendment, which allowed D.C. to participate in presidential elections, was enacted in 1961.

Answer: True

The Twenty-third Amendment, enabling the District of Columbia's participation in presidential elections, was ratified in 1961.

Related Concepts:

  • What constitutional amendment granted the District of Columbia the right to participate in presidential elections, and when was it enacted?: The Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1961, granted the District of Columbia the right to participate in presidential elections. This amendment allows the District to appoint electors, subject to specific limitations.
  • Which presidential election marked the first time the District of Columbia participated in a presidential election?: The District of Columbia participated in its first presidential election in 1964, following the ratification of the Twenty-third Amendment in 1961.

What constitutional amendment granted the District of Columbia the right to participate in presidential elections?

Answer: The Twenty-third Amendment

The Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1961, granted the District of Columbia the right to appoint electors in presidential elections.

Related Concepts:

  • What constitutional amendment granted the District of Columbia the right to participate in presidential elections, and when was it enacted?: The Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1961, granted the District of Columbia the right to participate in presidential elections. This amendment allows the District to appoint electors, subject to specific limitations.

Which presidential election marked the first time the District of Columbia participated following the 23rd Amendment?

Answer: 1964

Following the ratification of the Twenty-third Amendment in 1961, the District of Columbia participated in its first presidential election in 1964.

Related Concepts:

  • Which presidential election marked the first time the District of Columbia participated in a presidential election?: The District of Columbia participated in its first presidential election in 1964, following the ratification of the Twenty-third Amendment in 1961.
  • How many presidential elections has the District of Columbia participated in since the 23rd Amendment?: Since the enactment of the Twenty-third Amendment in 1961, the District of Columbia has participated in 16 presidential elections.

Electoral Mechanics: D.C.'s Representation

The District of Columbia is allocated five electoral votes in presidential elections.

Answer: False

The District of Columbia is allocated three electoral votes in presidential elections, not five.

Related Concepts:

  • How many electoral votes is the District of Columbia allocated in presidential elections?: Since the ratification of the Twenty-third Amendment in 1961, the District of Columbia has been allocated three electoral votes in every presidential election. This number is equivalent to the minimum allocated to any U.S. state.
  • Which presidential election marked the first time the District of Columbia participated in a presidential election?: The District of Columbia participated in its first presidential election in 1964, following the ratification of the Twenty-third Amendment in 1961.

The District of Columbia's electoral vote count is capped at the number of electors of the most populous U.S. state.

Answer: False

The Twenty-third Amendment caps the District of Columbia's electoral vote count at the number of electors of the *least populous* U.S. state, not the most populous.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the limitation placed on the District of Columbia's electoral vote allocation?: The Twenty-third Amendment stipulates that the District of Columbia cannot possess more electoral votes than the least populous U.S. state. Consequently, its electoral vote count is capped at the number assigned to the state with the smallest number of electors.
  • How many electoral votes is the District of Columbia allocated in presidential elections?: Since the ratification of the Twenty-third Amendment in 1961, the District of Columbia has been allocated three electoral votes in every presidential election. This number is equivalent to the minimum allocated to any U.S. state.

How many electoral votes is the District of Columbia allocated in presidential elections?

Answer: It is allocated three electoral votes.

The Twenty-third Amendment allocates three electoral votes to the District of Columbia, a number equivalent to the least populous state.

Related Concepts:

  • How many electoral votes is the District of Columbia allocated in presidential elections?: Since the ratification of the Twenty-third Amendment in 1961, the District of Columbia has been allocated three electoral votes in every presidential election. This number is equivalent to the minimum allocated to any U.S. state.
  • What is the overall narrative presented regarding the District of Columbia's role in U.S. presidential elections?: The overall narrative is that the District of Columbia, since gaining the right to vote in presidential elections via the 23rd Amendment, has consistently voted overwhelmingly Democratic, often differing from the national outcome, and holds a fixed number of three electoral votes tied to the least populous state.

What is the primary limitation on the District of Columbia's electoral vote count according to the Twenty-third Amendment?

Answer: It cannot exceed the electoral votes of the least populous U.S. state.

The Twenty-third Amendment stipulates that the District of Columbia's electoral vote count is capped at the number of electors assigned to the least populous U.S. state.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the limitation placed on the District of Columbia's electoral vote allocation?: The Twenty-third Amendment stipulates that the District of Columbia cannot possess more electoral votes than the least populous U.S. state. Consequently, its electoral vote count is capped at the number assigned to the state with the smallest number of electors.
  • What constitutional amendment granted the District of Columbia the right to participate in presidential elections, and when was it enacted?: The Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1961, granted the District of Columbia the right to participate in presidential elections. This amendment allows the District to appoint electors, subject to specific limitations.

What does the article suggest about the District of Columbia's electoral vote count in relation to state representation?

Answer: It is fixed at three, tied to the least populous state.

The article suggests that the District of Columbia's electoral vote count is fixed at three, as determined by the Twenty-third Amendment, which ties it to the representation of the least populous state, rather than fluctuating with population changes.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the article imply about the District of Columbia's electoral vote count in relation to state representation?: The article implies that the District of Columbia's electoral vote count is fixed at three, as determined by the Twenty-third Amendment, which ties it to the representation of the least populous state, rather than fluctuating with population changes.
  • What is the overall narrative presented regarding the District of Columbia's role in U.S. presidential elections?: The overall narrative is that the District of Columbia, since gaining the right to vote in presidential elections via the 23rd Amendment, has consistently voted overwhelmingly Democratic, often differing from the national outcome, and holds a fixed number of three electoral votes tied to the least populous state.

Historical Voting Trends: Democratic Dominance

The District of Columbia has participated in fewer than 10 presidential elections since the 23rd Amendment.

Answer: False

Since the 23rd Amendment, the District of Columbia has participated in 16 presidential elections.

Related Concepts:

  • How many presidential elections has the District of Columbia participated in since the 23rd Amendment?: Since the enactment of the Twenty-third Amendment in 1961, the District of Columbia has participated in 16 presidential elections.
  • Which presidential election marked the first time the District of Columbia participated in a presidential election?: The District of Columbia participated in its first presidential election in 1964, following the ratification of the Twenty-third Amendment in 1961.

The District of Columbia consistently votes for the Republican Party in presidential elections.

Answer: False

The District of Columbia consistently votes for the Democratic Party in presidential elections.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the general political leaning of the District of Columbia in presidential elections?: The District of Columbia demonstrates strong support for the Democratic Party in presidential elections, having overwhelmingly voted for the Democratic candidate in all 16 elections since 1961, with margins consistently exceeding 56.5 percentage points.
  • How is the District of Columbia's voting behavior in presidential elections characterized in the text?: The District of Columbia's voting behavior in presidential elections is characterized by overwhelming support for the Democratic Party, consistent participation since 1961, and a tendency to vote for the losing national candidate more frequently than the winner.

The Democratic Party's vote share in D.C. presidential elections has consistently remained below 70% since 1964.

Answer: False

The Democratic Party's vote share in D.C. presidential elections has consistently remained well above 70% since 1964, often exceeding 80% and frequently surpassing 90%.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the historical trend of the Democratic Party's performance in D.C. presidential elections since 1964?: Since 1964, the Democratic Party has consistently won the presidential election in the District of Columbia by substantial margins, with vote percentages often exceeding 80% and frequently surpassing 90%.
  • What does the table reveal about the Republican Party's performance in D.C. presidential elections since 1964?: The table shows that the Republican Party has never won the popular vote in the District of Columbia in any presidential election since 1964, with its vote share consistently remaining in the minority.

The District of Columbia's voting behavior is characterized by strong Democratic support and a tendency to vote for the national losing candidate.

Answer: True

The District of Columbia consistently demonstrates strong Democratic support in presidential elections and has voted for the national losing candidate in more elections than for the winner since the 23rd Amendment.

Related Concepts:

  • How is the District of Columbia's voting behavior in presidential elections characterized in the text?: The District of Columbia's voting behavior in presidential elections is characterized by overwhelming support for the Democratic Party, consistent participation since 1961, and a tendency to vote for the losing national candidate more frequently than the winner.
  • How has the District of Columbia's voting pattern compared to the national outcome in presidential elections?: The District of Columbia has voted for the losing national candidate in 9 out of the 16 presidential elections since 1961, indicating a consistent divergence from the national outcome.
  • In how many presidential elections has the District of Columbia voted for the losing candidate?: In 9 out of the 16 presidential elections since 1961, the District of Columbia has voted for the candidate who ultimately lost the national election.

The Republican Party has won the popular vote in the District of Columbia in at least one presidential election since 1964.

Answer: False

The Republican Party has not won the popular vote in the District of Columbia in any presidential election since 1964; its vote share has consistently remained in the minority.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the table reveal about the Republican Party's performance in D.C. presidential elections since 1964?: The table shows that the Republican Party has never won the popular vote in the District of Columbia in any presidential election since 1964, with its vote share consistently remaining in the minority.
  • What is the historical trend of the Democratic Party's performance in D.C. presidential elections since 1964?: Since 1964, the Democratic Party has consistently won the presidential election in the District of Columbia by substantial margins, with vote percentages often exceeding 80% and frequently surpassing 90%.

How many presidential elections has the District of Columbia participated in since the 23rd Amendment was enacted?

Answer: 16

Since the ratification of the Twenty-third Amendment in 1961, the District of Columbia has participated in 16 presidential elections, from 1964 through 2024.

Related Concepts:

  • How many presidential elections has the District of Columbia participated in since the 23rd Amendment?: Since the enactment of the Twenty-third Amendment in 1961, the District of Columbia has participated in 16 presidential elections.
  • Which presidential election marked the first time the District of Columbia participated in a presidential election?: The District of Columbia participated in its first presidential election in 1964, following the ratification of the Twenty-third Amendment in 1961.

What is the typical voting pattern of the District of Columbia in presidential elections?

Answer: It overwhelmingly votes for the Democratic candidate.

The District of Columbia overwhelmingly votes for the Democratic candidate in presidential elections, a pattern observed consistently since the 23rd Amendment.

Related Concepts:

  • How is the District of Columbia's voting behavior in presidential elections characterized in the text?: The District of Columbia's voting behavior in presidential elections is characterized by overwhelming support for the Democratic Party, consistent participation since 1961, and a tendency to vote for the losing national candidate more frequently than the winner.
  • What is the general political leaning of the District of Columbia in presidential elections?: The District of Columbia demonstrates strong support for the Democratic Party in presidential elections, having overwhelmingly voted for the Democratic candidate in all 16 elections since 1961, with margins consistently exceeding 56.5 percentage points.
  • What is the historical trend of the Democratic Party's performance in D.C. presidential elections since 1964?: Since 1964, the Democratic Party has consistently won the presidential election in the District of Columbia by substantial margins, with vote percentages often exceeding 80% and frequently surpassing 90%.

What is the overall trend in the Democratic Party's vote share in D.C. presidential elections since 1964?

Answer: It has remained consistently high, often above 80%.

Since 1964, the Democratic Party's vote share in D.C. presidential elections has consistently been high, frequently exceeding 80% and often surpassing 90%.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the historical trend of the Democratic Party's performance in D.C. presidential elections since 1964?: Since 1964, the Democratic Party has consistently won the presidential election in the District of Columbia by substantial margins, with vote percentages often exceeding 80% and frequently surpassing 90%.
  • What does the table reveal about the Republican Party's performance in D.C. presidential elections since 1964?: The table shows that the Republican Party has never won the popular vote in the District of Columbia in any presidential election since 1964, with its vote share consistently remaining in the minority.

What does the table reveal about the Republican Party's performance in D.C. presidential elections since 1964?

Answer: Their vote share has consistently been in the minority.

The table reveals that the Republican Party has consistently received a minority of the vote in D.C. presidential elections since 1964, never winning the popular vote and often receiving less than 15%.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the table reveal about the Republican Party's performance in D.C. presidential elections since 1964?: The table shows that the Republican Party has never won the popular vote in the District of Columbia in any presidential election since 1964, with its vote share consistently remaining in the minority.
  • What is the significance of the 'voted for winning candidate' and 'voted for losing candidate' data points in the infobox?: These data points highlight the frequency with which the District of Columbia's electoral choices aligned with the eventual national winner. Voting for the winning candidate in 7 elections and the losing candidate in 9 indicates that D.C.'s electoral outcome has diverged from the national result more often than it has aligned since 1961.
  • What is the historical trend of the Democratic Party's performance in D.C. presidential elections since 1964?: Since 1964, the Democratic Party has consistently won the presidential election in the District of Columbia by substantial margins, with vote percentages often exceeding 80% and frequently surpassing 90%.

Divergence from National Results

In most presidential elections since 1961, the District of Columbia has voted for the winning national candidate.

Answer: False

The District of Columbia has voted for the losing national candidate in more presidential elections (9 out of 16) than for the winning candidate (7 out of 16) since 1961.

Related Concepts:

  • In how many presidential elections has the District of Columbia voted for the losing candidate?: In 9 out of the 16 presidential elections since 1961, the District of Columbia has voted for the candidate who ultimately lost the national election.
  • How has the District of Columbia's voting pattern compared to the national outcome in presidential elections?: The District of Columbia has voted for the losing national candidate in 9 out of the 16 presidential elections since 1961, indicating a consistent divergence from the national outcome.
  • What does the infobox state about the number of elections the District voted for the winning candidate versus the losing candidate?: The infobox indicates that the District of Columbia has voted for the winning national candidate in 7 of the 16 presidential elections since 1961, and for the losing candidate in 9.

George McGovern won the District of Columbia in the 1972 presidential election, despite Richard Nixon winning nationally.

Answer: True

In the 1972 presidential election, George McGovern secured the popular vote in the District of Columbia, while Richard Nixon won the national election.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the District of Columbia vote in the 1972 presidential election?: In the 1972 presidential election, George McGovern (D) won the District of Columbia with 127,627 votes (78.1%), while Richard Nixon (R), the national winner, received 35,226 votes (21.56%).

Walter Mondale won the District of Columbia in 1984, even though Ronald Reagan won the national election.

Answer: True

In the 1984 presidential election, Walter Mondale carried the District of Columbia, despite Ronald Reagan achieving victory nationally.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the District of Columbia vote in the 1984 presidential election, and who was the national winner?: In the 1984 presidential election, Walter Mondale (D) won the District of Columbia with 180,408 votes (85.38%), while Ronald Reagan (R), the national winner, received 29,009 votes (13.73%).

Kamala Harris won the District of Columbia in the 2024 election, and Donald Trump won the national election.

Answer: True

According to the provided data, Kamala Harris won the District of Columbia in the 2024 presidential election, while Donald Trump secured the national victory.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the results for Kamala Harris and Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential election in the District of Columbia?: In the 2024 presidential election, Kamala Harris (D) won the District of Columbia with 294,185 votes (90.28%). Donald Trump (R), the national winner, received 21,076 votes (6.47%).

The infobox indicates that the District of Columbia has voted for the losing candidate in more presidential elections than the winning candidate.

Answer: True

The infobox states that the District of Columbia has voted for the losing national candidate in 9 presidential elections and for the winning candidate in 7 elections, confirming it has voted for the losing candidate more often.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the infobox state about the number of elections the District voted for the winning candidate versus the losing candidate?: The infobox indicates that the District of Columbia has voted for the winning national candidate in 7 of the 16 presidential elections since 1961, and for the losing candidate in 9.
  • What is the primary function of the infobox at the beginning of the article?: The infobox provides a concise summary of key statistics regarding presidential elections in the District of Columbia, including total elections, party wins, and alignment with the national winner or loser.
  • What is the significance of the 'voted for winning candidate' and 'voted for losing candidate' data points in the infobox?: These data points highlight the frequency with which the District of Columbia's electoral choices aligned with the eventual national winner. Voting for the winning candidate in 7 elections and the losing candidate in 9 indicates that D.C.'s electoral outcome has diverged from the national result more often than it has aligned since 1961.

In how many presidential elections has the District of Columbia voted for the candidate who lost the national election?

Answer: 9

The District of Columbia has voted for the candidate who lost the national election in 9 out of the 16 presidential elections it has participated in since 1961.

Related Concepts:

  • In how many presidential elections has the District of Columbia voted for the losing candidate?: In 9 out of the 16 presidential elections since 1961, the District of Columbia has voted for the candidate who ultimately lost the national election.
  • How has the District of Columbia's voting pattern compared to the national outcome in presidential elections?: The District of Columbia has voted for the losing national candidate in 9 out of the 16 presidential elections since 1961, indicating a consistent divergence from the national outcome.
  • What does the infobox state about the number of elections the District voted for the winning candidate versus the losing candidate?: The infobox indicates that the District of Columbia has voted for the winning national candidate in 7 of the 16 presidential elections since 1961, and for the losing candidate in 9.

According to the infobox, how many times has the District of Columbia voted for the winning candidate in presidential elections?

Answer: 7 times

The infobox indicates that the District of Columbia has voted for the winning national candidate in 7 out of the 16 presidential elections it has participated in since 1961.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the infobox state about the number of elections the District voted for the winning candidate versus the losing candidate?: The infobox indicates that the District of Columbia has voted for the winning national candidate in 7 of the 16 presidential elections since 1961, and for the losing candidate in 9.
  • What is the primary function of the infobox at the beginning of the article?: The infobox provides a concise summary of key statistics regarding presidential elections in the District of Columbia, including total elections, party wins, and alignment with the national winner or loser.
  • What is the significance of the 'voted for winning candidate' and 'voted for losing candidate' data points in the infobox?: These data points highlight the frequency with which the District of Columbia's electoral choices aligned with the eventual national winner. Voting for the winning candidate in 7 elections and the losing candidate in 9 indicates that D.C.'s electoral outcome has diverged from the national result more often than it has aligned since 1961.

How does the District of Columbia's voting behavior often compare to the national outcome in presidential elections?

Answer: It has diverged from the national winner more often than it has aligned.

The District of Columbia's voting behavior has diverged from the national outcome in presidential elections more frequently than it has aligned, having voted for the losing candidate in 9 out of 16 elections since 1961.

Related Concepts:

  • How is the District of Columbia's voting behavior in presidential elections characterized in the text?: The District of Columbia's voting behavior in presidential elections is characterized by overwhelming support for the Democratic Party, consistent participation since 1961, and a tendency to vote for the losing national candidate more frequently than the winner.
  • What is the significance of the 'voted for winning candidate' and 'voted for losing candidate' data points in the infobox?: These data points highlight the frequency with which the District of Columbia's electoral choices aligned with the eventual national winner. Voting for the winning candidate in 7 elections and the losing candidate in 9 indicates that D.C.'s electoral outcome has diverged from the national result more often than it has aligned since 1961.
  • How has the District of Columbia's voting pattern compared to the national outcome in presidential elections?: The District of Columbia has voted for the losing national candidate in 9 out of the 16 presidential elections since 1961, indicating a consistent divergence from the national outcome.

Key Presidential Elections: Case Studies

In the 2000 presidential election, all three of D.C.'s electoral votes were cast for Al Gore.

Answer: False

In the 2000 presidential election, one elector for the District of Columbia cast a blank ballot as a protest, meaning only two of the three electoral votes were officially cast for Al Gore.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the District of Columbia vote in the 2000 presidential election, considering the elector abstention?: In the 2000 presidential election, Al Gore (D) received 171,923 votes (85.16%) in the District of Columbia. However, one elector abstained, resulting in Gore being officially credited with only two electoral votes. George W. Bush (R), the national winner, received 18,073 votes (8.95%).
  • What notable event occurred with the District of Columbia's electoral vote in the 2000 presidential election?: In the 2000 presidential election, Barbara Lett-Simmons, an elector for the District of Columbia, cast a blank ballot as a protest against the District's lack of congressional representation. Consequently, Al Gore received only two of the District's three electoral votes.

Lyndon B. Johnson won the District of Columbia in the 1964 presidential election with over 85% of the vote.

Answer: True

In the 1964 presidential election, Lyndon B. Johnson received 85.5% of the vote in the District of Columbia.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the results of the 1964 presidential election in the District of Columbia?: In the 1964 presidential election, Lyndon B. Johnson (D) won the District of Columbia with 169,796 votes (85.5%), while Barry Goldwater (R) received 28,801 votes (14.5%). Johnson was the national winner.
  • What is the historical trend of the Democratic Party's performance in D.C. presidential elections since 1964?: Since 1964, the Democratic Party has consistently won the presidential election in the District of Columbia by substantial margins, with vote percentages often exceeding 80% and frequently surpassing 90%.

In the 1980 presidential election, Ronald Reagan received more votes in D.C. than Jimmy Carter.

Answer: False

In the 1980 presidential election, Jimmy Carter received more votes in the District of Columbia than Ronald Reagan.

Related Concepts:

  • Which presidential candidates received votes in the District of Columbia in the 1980 election, and what were their vote shares?: In the 1980 presidential election, Jimmy Carter (D) received 130,231 votes (74.32%), Ronald Reagan (R) received 23,313 votes (13.3%), and John B. Anderson (I) received 16,131 votes (9.21%) in the District of Columbia.
  • What were the vote counts for the main candidates in the 1976 presidential election in the District of Columbia?: In the 1976 presidential election, Jimmy Carter (D) received 137,818 votes (81.63%) in the District of Columbia, and Gerald Ford (R) received 27,873 votes (16.51%).

Bill Clinton won the District of Columbia in 1992 with less than 70% of the vote.

Answer: False

Bill Clinton won the District of Columbia in the 1992 presidential election with 84.64% of the vote, which is significantly more than 70%.

Related Concepts:

  • Who won the District of Columbia's vote in the 1992 presidential election, and what percentage did they achieve?: Bill Clinton (D) won the District of Columbia's vote in the 1992 presidential election with 192,619 votes (84.64%). George H. W. Bush (R) received 20,698 votes (9.1%), and Ross Perot (I) received 9,681 votes (4.25%).

In the 2004 presidential election, George W. Bush won the popular vote in the District of Columbia.

Answer: False

In the 2004 presidential election, John Kerry won the popular vote in the District of Columbia, not George W. Bush.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the results of the 2004 presidential election in the District of Columbia?: In the 2004 presidential election, John Kerry (D) won the District of Columbia with 202,970 votes (89.18%), while George W. Bush (R), the national winner, received 21,256 votes (9.34%).

Barack Obama received over 90% of the vote in D.C. during the 2008 presidential election.

Answer: True

Barack Obama received 92.46% of the vote in the District of Columbia during the 2008 presidential election.

Related Concepts:

  • Which candidate received the highest percentage of votes in the District of Columbia in the 2008 presidential election?: Barack Obama (D) received the highest percentage of votes in the District of Columbia in the 2008 presidential election, securing 92.46% with 245,800 votes. John McCain (R) received 17,367 votes (6.53%).
  • What is the historical trend of the Democratic Party's performance in D.C. presidential elections since 1964?: Since 1964, the Democratic Party has consistently won the presidential election in the District of Columbia by substantial margins, with vote percentages often exceeding 80% and frequently surpassing 90%.

Donald Trump received more votes than Hillary Clinton in the District of Columbia in the 2016 presidential election.

Answer: False

Hillary Clinton received significantly more votes than Donald Trump in the District of Columbia during the 2016 presidential election.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the District of Columbia vote in the 2016 presidential election, and what was the Republican candidate's performance?: In the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton (D) won the District of Columbia with 282,830 votes (90.86%). Donald Trump (R), the national winner, received 12,723 votes (4.09%) in the District.

Joe Biden won the District of Columbia in the 2020 election with a smaller percentage of the vote than Barack Obama received in 2012.

Answer: False

Joe Biden's percentage of the vote in the District of Columbia in 2020 (92.15%) was higher than Barack Obama's percentage in 2012 (90.91%).

Related Concepts:

  • What were the vote shares for the Democratic and Republican candidates in the 2012 presidential election in D.C.?: In the 2012 presidential election, Barack Obama (D) received 90.91% of the vote in the District of Columbia with 267,070 votes. Mitt Romney (R) received 21,381 votes (7.28%).
  • What were the results for Joe Biden and Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election in the District of Columbia?: In the 2020 presidential election, Joe Biden (D) won the District of Columbia with 317,323 votes (92.15%). Donald Trump (R) received 18,586 votes (5.4%).

What unusual event occurred with D.C.'s electoral vote in the 2000 presidential election?

Answer: An elector cast a blank ballot as a protest.

In the 2000 presidential election, an elector for the District of Columbia cast a blank ballot as a protest against the District's lack of congressional representation, resulting in only two of the three electoral votes being officially cast for Al Gore.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the District of Columbia vote in the 2000 presidential election, considering the elector abstention?: In the 2000 presidential election, Al Gore (D) received 171,923 votes (85.16%) in the District of Columbia. However, one elector abstained, resulting in Gore being officially credited with only two electoral votes. George W. Bush (R), the national winner, received 18,073 votes (8.95%).
  • What notable event occurred with the District of Columbia's electoral vote in the 2000 presidential election?: In the 2000 presidential election, Barbara Lett-Simmons, an elector for the District of Columbia, cast a blank ballot as a protest against the District's lack of congressional representation. Consequently, Al Gore received only two of the District's three electoral votes.

In the 1964 presidential election, who won the District of Columbia's vote, and what percentage did they receive?

Answer: Lyndon B. Johnson (D) with 85.5%

In the 1964 presidential election, Lyndon B. Johnson (D) won the District of Columbia with 85.5% of the vote.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the results of the 1964 presidential election in the District of Columbia?: In the 1964 presidential election, Lyndon B. Johnson (D) won the District of Columbia with 169,796 votes (85.5%), while Barry Goldwater (R) received 28,801 votes (14.5%). Johnson was the national winner.
  • What is the historical trend of the Democratic Party's performance in D.C. presidential elections since 1964?: Since 1964, the Democratic Party has consistently won the presidential election in the District of Columbia by substantial margins, with vote percentages often exceeding 80% and frequently surpassing 90%.

Which candidate won the District of Columbia's popular vote in the 1972 presidential election?

Answer: George McGovern (D)

George McGovern (D) won the District of Columbia's popular vote in the 1972 presidential election.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the District of Columbia vote in the 1972 presidential election?: In the 1972 presidential election, George McGovern (D) won the District of Columbia with 127,627 votes (78.1%), while Richard Nixon (R), the national winner, received 35,226 votes (21.56%).
  • What were the vote counts for the main candidates in the 1976 presidential election in the District of Columbia?: In the 1976 presidential election, Jimmy Carter (D) received 137,818 votes (81.63%) in the District of Columbia, and Gerald Ford (R) received 27,873 votes (16.51%).

In the 1980 presidential election, who received the most votes in the District of Columbia?

Answer: Jimmy Carter (D)

In the 1980 presidential election, Jimmy Carter (D) received the most votes in the District of Columbia.

Related Concepts:

  • Which presidential candidates received votes in the District of Columbia in the 1980 election, and what were their vote shares?: In the 1980 presidential election, Jimmy Carter (D) received 130,231 votes (74.32%), Ronald Reagan (R) received 23,313 votes (13.3%), and John B. Anderson (I) received 16,131 votes (9.21%) in the District of Columbia.
  • How did the District of Columbia vote in the 1984 presidential election, and who was the national winner?: In the 1984 presidential election, Walter Mondale (D) won the District of Columbia with 180,408 votes (85.38%), while Ronald Reagan (R), the national winner, received 29,009 votes (13.73%).

Which candidate won the District of Columbia's vote in the 1984 presidential election?

Answer: Walter Mondale (D)

Walter Mondale (D) won the District of Columbia's vote in the 1984 presidential election.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the District of Columbia vote in the 1984 presidential election, and who was the national winner?: In the 1984 presidential election, Walter Mondale (D) won the District of Columbia with 180,408 votes (85.38%), while Ronald Reagan (R), the national winner, received 29,009 votes (13.73%).

In the 1992 presidential election, Bill Clinton won the District of Columbia with what percentage of the vote?

Answer: 84.64%

Bill Clinton won the District of Columbia in the 1992 presidential election with 84.64% of the vote.

Related Concepts:

  • Who won the District of Columbia's vote in the 1992 presidential election, and what percentage did they achieve?: Bill Clinton (D) won the District of Columbia's vote in the 1992 presidential election with 192,619 votes (84.64%). George H. W. Bush (R) received 20,698 votes (9.1%), and Ross Perot (I) received 9,681 votes (4.25%).

What was the approximate percentage of the vote won by Al Gore in the District of Columbia in the 2000 presidential election?

Answer: 85.16%

Al Gore won approximately 85.16% of the vote in the District of Columbia in the 2000 presidential election.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the District of Columbia vote in the 2000 presidential election, considering the elector abstention?: In the 2000 presidential election, Al Gore (D) received 171,923 votes (85.16%) in the District of Columbia. However, one elector abstained, resulting in Gore being officially credited with only two electoral votes. George W. Bush (R), the national winner, received 18,073 votes (8.95%).
  • What were the results for Joe Biden and Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election in the District of Columbia?: In the 2020 presidential election, Joe Biden (D) won the District of Columbia with 317,323 votes (92.15%). Donald Trump (R) received 18,586 votes (5.4%).

Which candidate received the highest percentage of votes in the District of Columbia in the 2008 presidential election?

Answer: Barack Obama (D)

Barack Obama (D) received the highest percentage of votes in the District of Columbia in the 2008 presidential election, securing 92.46%.

Related Concepts:

  • Which candidate received the highest percentage of votes in the District of Columbia in the 2008 presidential election?: Barack Obama (D) received the highest percentage of votes in the District of Columbia in the 2008 presidential election, securing 92.46% with 245,800 votes. John McCain (R) received 17,367 votes (6.53%).
  • What were the results of the 2004 presidential election in the District of Columbia?: In the 2004 presidential election, John Kerry (D) won the District of Columbia with 202,970 votes (89.18%), while George W. Bush (R), the national winner, received 21,256 votes (9.34%).

In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump (R) received what percentage of the vote in the District of Columbia?

Answer: 4.09%

In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump (R) received 4.09% of the vote in the District of Columbia.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the District of Columbia vote in the 2016 presidential election, and what was the Republican candidate's performance?: In the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton (D) won the District of Columbia with 282,830 votes (90.86%). Donald Trump (R), the national winner, received 12,723 votes (4.09%) in the District.
  • What specific detail is provided about Donald Trump's vote share in D.C. in the 2016 election?: In the 2016 presidential election, Donald Trump received fewer votes in the District of Columbia than all third-party candidates combined, garnering 12,723 votes.

Which of the following candidates received votes in the District of Columbia in the 1996 presidential election?

Answer: Ralph Nader (G)

In the 1996 presidential election, Ralph Nader (Green Party) received 4,780 votes in the District of Columbia.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the 1996 presidential election in the District of Columbia?: In the 1996 presidential election, Bill Clinton (D) won the District of Columbia with 158,220 votes (85.19%), Bob Dole (R) received 17,339 votes (9.34%), and Ralph Nader (G) received 4,780 votes (2.57%).

Political Status and Advocacy

A 2016 referendum showed overwhelming opposition to making the District of Columbia a state.

Answer: False

The 2016 referendum on statehood for the District of Columbia showed overwhelming *support*, with 85.7% of registered voters approving it.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the 2016 statehood referendum in Washington, D.C.?: In 2016, a statehood referendum was held in Washington, D.C., with 85.7% of registered voters approving it, indicating substantial support for making the District a state.
  • What does the article suggest about the future of D.C. statehood?: The article mentions ongoing statehood movements in the District of Columbia and references a successful 2016 referendum on the issue, indicating it remains a current political topic.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact aims to award electoral votes based on state popular vote winners.

Answer: False

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact aims to award electoral votes to the candidate who wins the *national* popular vote, not based on individual state popular vote winners.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, and how does it relate to the District of Columbia?: The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an agreement among U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to the presidential candidate who wins the national popular vote. The District of Columbia is a signatory to this compact.

The text mentions that the District of Columbia has never had a movement advocating for its statehood.

Answer: False

The text explicitly mentions statehood movements and refers to a 2016 statehood referendum that was approved by a significant majority of voters, contradicting the assertion that no such movement exists.

Related Concepts:

  • What movements related to the District of Columbia's political status are mentioned in the text?: The text mentions statehood movements in the District of Columbia and references a 2016 statehood referendum that was approved by a significant majority of voters.
  • What does the article suggest about the future of D.C. statehood?: The article mentions ongoing statehood movements in the District of Columbia and references a successful 2016 referendum on the issue, indicating it remains a current political topic.

What was the outcome of the 2016 statehood referendum in Washington, D.C.?

Answer: It was approved by a significant majority of voters.

The 2016 statehood referendum in Washington, D.C., was approved by 85.7% of registered voters, indicating substantial support for the district's statehood.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome of the 2016 statehood referendum in Washington, D.C.?: In 2016, a statehood referendum was held in Washington, D.C., with 85.7% of registered voters approving it, indicating substantial support for making the District a state.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact seeks to award electoral votes to the candidate who wins:

Answer: The national popular vote.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an agreement among U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to the presidential candidate who wins the overall national popular vote.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, and how does it relate to the District of Columbia?: The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an agreement among U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to the presidential candidate who wins the national popular vote. The District of Columbia is a signatory to this compact.

Interpreting Election Data: Symbols and Notes

The symbol of a single dagger (†) in the election results table signifies the national winner.

Answer: False

The election results table uses a double dagger (‡) to signify the national winner; the meaning of a single dagger is not specified in the provided data.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the symbol of a double dagger (‡) signify in the election results table?: The symbol of a double dagger (‡) in the election results table signifies that the candidate was the national winner of that particular presidential election.

The definition of an 'other candidate' includes the winner and runner-up in the election results table.

Answer: False

The definition of an 'other candidate' in the election results table specifies the person who received the third-most votes in the District of Columbia for that election, not the winner or runner-up.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the definition of an 'other candidate' as noted in the election results table?: According to the notes for the election results table, an 'other candidate' is defined as the person who received the third-most votes in the District of Columbia for that specific election. The sum of votes for the winner, runner-up, and this 'other candidate' does not equal the total votes cast, as votes for other candidates or write-ins are not included in this specific tally.

The map image accompanying the article serves to illustrate the District's voting margins over time.

Answer: False

The map image is a locator map of the United States with the District of Columbia highlighted, serving to geographically contextualize the subject rather than illustrate voting margins over time.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the map image accompanying the article?: The map image is a locator map of the United States with the District of Columbia highlighted, serving to geographically contextualize the subject matter.

The 'See also' section provides links to related articles about different types of elections and geographical results.

Answer: True

The 'See also' section provides links to related articles, such as 'Elections in the District of Columbia' and 'List of United States presidential election results by state,' facilitating further exploration of related topics.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the purpose of the 'See also' section in the article?: The 'See also' section provides links to related articles, such as 'Elections in the District of Columbia' and 'List of United States presidential election results by state,' to facilitate further exploration of related topics.

The article mentions that a graph showing election results needs to be updated using a newer extension.

Answer: True

The article notes that a graph depicting election results requires updating to the newer Chart extension, as it is currently using a legacy Graph extension that is no longer supported.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the status of the graph mentioned in the article regarding election results?: The article notes that a graph depicting election results requires updating to the newer Chart extension, as it is currently using a legacy Graph extension that is no longer supported.

What does the symbol of a double dagger (‡) signify in the election results table?

Answer: The candidate who was the national winner of the election.

In the election results table, a double dagger (‡) is used to signify the candidate who won the national popular vote in that presidential election.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the symbol of a double dagger (‡) signify in the election results table?: The symbol of a double dagger (‡) in the election results table signifies that the candidate was the national winner of that particular presidential election.

What does the definition of an 'other candidate' in the election results table clarify?

Answer: It is the person who received the third-most votes in D.C.

The definition of an 'other candidate' in the election results table specifies the individual who secured the third-highest number of votes within the District of Columbia for that particular election.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the definition of an 'other candidate' as noted in the election results table?: According to the notes for the election results table, an 'other candidate' is defined as the person who received the third-most votes in the District of Columbia for that specific election. The sum of votes for the winner, runner-up, and this 'other candidate' does not equal the total votes cast, as votes for other candidates or write-ins are not included in this specific tally.

What is the significance of the party color coding in the election results table?

Answer: It visually represents the political party affiliation of each candidate.

The party color coding in the election results table serves to visually distinguish the political party affiliation of each candidate, enhancing readability and comprehension of the data.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the party color coding in the election results table?: The party color coding in the election results table visually represents the political party affiliation of each candidate, aiding in the tracking of party performance.

What does the 'Notes' section clarify regarding vote totals in the election results table?

Answer: It clarifies that the sum of votes for the top three candidates does not necessarily equal the total votes cast.

The 'Notes' section clarifies that the sum of votes for the winner, runner-up, and the 'other candidate' (third-place finisher) does not necessarily equal the total votes cast, as votes for any remaining candidates or write-ins are not included in this specific summation.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the 'Notes' section clarify regarding vote totals?: The 'Notes' section clarifies that the sum of votes for the winner, runner-up, and the 'other candidate' (third-place finisher) does not equal the total votes cast, as votes for other candidates or write-ins are not included in this specific tally.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy