What is the fundamental definition of phylogenetics in biology?

In biology, phylogenetics is defined as the study of the evolutionary history of life. It achieves this by examining observable characteristics of organisms or genes, a process known as phylogenetic inference.

What is the primary output or result of phylogenetic inference?

The primary result of phylogenetic inference is a phylogenetic tree, which is a diagram that visually represents the hypothetical evolutionary relationships among various organisms.

What do the tips of a phylogenetic tree signify?

The tips of a phylogenetic tree represent the observed entities being studied, which can include living taxa or species, as well as fossils.

How do rooted and unrooted phylogenetic tree diagrams differ?

A rooted phylogenetic tree diagram indicates the hypothetical common ancestor of the taxa displayed on the tree, showing the direction of evolutionary change. In contrast, an unrooted tree diagram, also known as a network, does not assume any directionality of character state transformation and therefore does not show the origin or 'root' of the taxa in question.

Beyond inferring relationships among taxa, what other applications do phylogenetic analyses have?

Phylogenetic analyses are frequently used to illustrate relationships among genes or individual organisms. These applications are crucial for understanding biodiversity, evolution, ecology, and genomes.

How does phylogenetics relate to systematics?

Phylogenetics is an integral part of systematics, a field that interprets the evolutionary relationships and origins of species by analyzing their similarities and differences in characteristics.

How is phylogenetics applied in cancer research?

In cancer research, phylogenetics is utilized to investigate the clonal evolution of tumors and molecular chronology. It helps predict and demonstrate how cell populations change throughout disease progression and during treatment, often employing whole genome sequencing techniques.

What are the key differences in evolutionary processes observed in cancer progression compared to sexually-reproducing species?

The evolutionary processes in cancer progression, which involve mitotic reproduction, differ from those in sexually-reproducing species in several ways. These include variations in the types of aberrations that occur, different mutation rates, high heterogeneity among tumor cell subclones, and the absence of genetic recombination.

How can phylogenetics contribute to drug design and discovery?

Phylogenetics assists in drug design and discovery by enabling scientists to organize species and identify which ones are likely to possess medically useful traits, such as the ability to produce biologically active compounds. For instance, it helps screen for closely related species that may share traits like venom production, which has yielded important drugs like ACE inhibitors and Ziconotide.

What does the phylogenetic tree of fish illustrate regarding venom evolution?

The phylogenetic tree of fish demonstrates that venom has evolved multiple times independently within different fish species. This visual representation helps biologists identify potentially venomous fish, snake, and lizard species by examining their evolutionary relationships.

What role does phylogenetics play in forensic science?

In forensic science, phylogenetic tools are valuable for evaluating DNA evidence in legal cases, having been used in criminal trials to either exonerate or implicate individuals.

What are the specific applications and limitations of HIV forensics using phylogenetic analysis?

HIV forensics employs phylogenetic analysis to track differences in HIV genes and determine the relatedness of two samples. However, it has limitations, as it cannot serve as the sole proof of transmission between individuals, and while it shows transmission relatedness, it does not indicate the direction of transmission.

What is taxonomy, and what was the basis of the traditional Linnaean classification system?

Taxonomy is the scientific discipline concerned with the identification, naming, and classification of organisms. The Linnaean classification system, developed in the 1700s by Carolus Linnaeus, traditionally relied on the phenotypes, or observable physical characteristics, of organisms to group species.

How have modern classification methods evolved beyond traditional Linnaean taxonomy?

With advancements in biochemistry, modern classification methods often base their groupings on DNA sequence data or a combination of DNA and morphological characteristics, moving beyond solely physical traits.

What is a monophyletic taxon, and why do many systematists advocate for their recognition?

A monophyletic taxon is a group of organisms that consists of a common ancestor and all of its descendants. Many systematists argue that only monophyletic taxa should be formally recognized as named groups because they accurately reflect evolutionary history.

How do phenetics, cladistics, and evolutionary taxonomy differ in their approach to classification?

Phenetics constructs trees based on overall similarity in observable traits, disregarding phylogenetic speculation. Cladistics, or phylogenetic systematics, aims to reflect phylogeny by recognizing groups solely based on shared, derived characters called synapomorphies. Evolutionary taxonomy, on the other hand, seeks a compromise by considering both the branching pattern of evolution and the 'degree of difference' between organisms.

What computational approaches are commonly used for phylogenetic inference?

Common methods for phylogenetic inference involve computational approaches that implement an optimality criterion, including parsimony, maximum likelihood (ML), and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)-based Bayesian inference. These methods rely on mathematical models that describe the probabilities of character state transformations.

What was phenetics, and how did it approach tree construction?

Phenetics was a popular method in the mid-20th century, though now largely obsolete, that used distance matrix-based approaches to build trees. These trees were constructed based on the overall similarity of organisms' morphology or other observable traits, which was often presumed to approximate phylogenetic relationships. Neighbor Joining is an example of a phenetic method still used for DNA barcodes.

Why were phylogenetic inferences prior to 1950 considered ambiguous?

Before 1950, phylogenetic inferences were typically presented as narrative scenarios. These methods were often ambiguous because they lacked explicit criteria for evaluating alternative hypotheses about evolutionary relationships.

What is taxon sampling in phylogenetic analysis, and why is it important?

Taxon sampling in phylogenetic analysis involves selecting a small, representative group of exemplar taxa to infer the evolutionary history of a larger clade. This process, also known as stratified sampling or clade-based sampling, is crucial due to limited resources for comparing every species and the computational constraints of phylogenetic software.

What are the potential consequences of poor taxon sampling?

Poor taxon sampling can lead to incorrect phylogenetic inferences. A theoretical cause for such inaccuracy is long branch attraction, where non-related branches are mistakenly grouped together due to shared, homoplastic nucleotide sites.

What is the debate surrounding the impact of increasing the number of taxa versus the number of genes sampled on phylogenetic accuracy?

There is a debate about whether increasing the number of taxa sampled or increasing the number of genes sampled per taxon more significantly improves phylogenetic accuracy. Differences in these sampling methods affect the total number of nucleotide sites used in sequence alignment, which can lead to disagreements in phylogenetic tree construction.

What did the research presented in 'Taxon Sampling, Bioinformatics, and Phylogenomics' conclude about sampling methods and accuracy?

The research in 'Taxon Sampling, Bioinformatics, and Phylogenomics' indicated that sampling fewer taxa but with more genes per taxon generally leads to higher accuracy in phylogenetic trees. This was supported by increased bootstrapping replicability and observed across four different phylogenetic tree construction models: neighbor-joining, minimum evolution, unweighted maximum parsimony, and maximum likelihood.

What challenge arises when trying to increase gene comparison per taxon in phylogenetic analysis?

A challenge in increasing gene comparison per taxon is the presence of unbalanced datasets within genomic databases, which makes it increasingly difficult to sample more genes from uncommonly sampled organisms.

What is the origin of the term 'phylogeny'?

The term 'phylogeny' originates from the German word 'Phylogenie', which was introduced by Ernst Haeckel in 1866.

How did the Darwinian approach to classification become known?

The Darwinian approach to classification became known as the 'phyletic' approach.

Who was an early precursor to the concept of the parsimony principle in phylogenetics?

Aristotle, in his work *Posterior Analytics*, was an early precursor to the concept of the parsimony principle, suggesting that, all else being equal, a demonstration derived from fewer postulates or hypotheses is superior.

What was Ernst Haeckel's recapitulation theory, and why was it rejected?

Ernst Haeckel's recapitulation theory, often summarized as 'ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny,' proposed that the development of a single organism from germ to adult mirrors the adult stages of its successive ancestors. This theory has long been rejected because ontogeny itself evolves, meaning a species' phylogenetic history cannot be directly read from its individual development.

When did Darwin's notebooks first show an evolutionary tree?

Darwin's notebooks first showed an evolutionary tree in 1837.

Who published what is considered the first paleontological 'Tree of Life,' and when?

American Geologist Edward Hitchcock published what is considered the first paleontological 'Tree of Life' in 1840.

What distinction did Richard Owen make in 1843 that was a precursor concept in phylogenetics?

In 1843, Richard Owen made the distinction between homology and analogy, with analogy now referred to as homoplasy. Homology describes similarities due to common ancestry, while homoplasy describes features gained or lost independently in different lineages.

What was Heinrich Georg Bronn's contribution to the concept of evolutionary trees in 1858?

In 1858, Paleontologist Heinrich Georg Bronn published a hypothetical tree illustrating the paleontological 'arrival' of new, similar species following the extinction of older ones, serving as a precursor concept to modern evolutionary trees, though he did not propose a mechanism for these phenomena.

Who elaborated on evolutionary theory in 1858, preceding Darwin's *Origin of Species*?

Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace elaborated on evolutionary theory in 1858, a year before Darwin's *Origin of Species* was published.

What was Dollo's Law of Character State Irreversibility, introduced in 1893?

Dollo's Law of Character State Irreversibility, introduced in 1893, states that an organism never returns exactly to a previous state due to the indelible nature of its past, always retaining some trace of its transitional evolutionary stages.

Who popularized Maximum Likelihood (ML) in 1912 and contributed to the 'modern synthesis'?

Ronald Fisher popularized Maximum Likelihood (ML) in 1912 and was a key contributor to the early 20th-century revival of Darwinism, using mathematics to combine Mendelian genetics and natural selection in the 'modern synthesis'.

When was the term 'clade' coined, and by whom?

The term 'clade' was coined by Lucien Cuénot in 1940, deriving from the Greek word 'klados' meaning branch, and he used it to describe evolutionary branching.

Who introduced the term 'Kladogenesis' and when?

Bernhard Rensch introduced the term 'Kladogenesis' in his German book *Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre Die transspezifische Evolution* in 1947, which was later translated into English as *Evolution Above the Species Level*.

Who is considered the founder of phylogenetic systematics, and when did he publish his foundational works?

Willi Hennig is considered the founder of phylogenetic systematics, publishing his first formalization of the theory in German in 1950. He also asserted a version of the parsimony principle, which is foundational to phylogenetic inference.

When did Julian Huxley adopt the term 'cladogenesis' and introduce 'clades' with a full definition?

Julian Huxley adopted Bernhard Rensch's terminology of 'cladogenesis' in 1957, defining it as all splitting from subspeciation to the divergence of phyla and kingdoms. He also introduced the word 'clades' to refer to the delimitable monophyletic units resulting from cladogenesis.

Who coined the term 'cladistic' to mean evolutionary relationship, and when?

Arthur Cain and Geoffrey Ainsworth Harrison coined the term 'cladistic' to refer to evolutionary relationships in 1960.

When was the first attempt to use Maximum Likelihood (ML) for phylogenetics, and by whom?

The first attempt to use Maximum Likelihood (ML) for phylogenetics was made by Edwards and Cavalli-Sforza in 1963.

What significant contributions did Camin and Sokal make to cladistic analysis in 1965?

In 1965, Camin and Sokal introduced Camin-Sokal parsimony, which was the first parsimony (optimization) criterion, and also developed the first computer program/algorithm for cladistic analysis. They independently introduced the character compatibility method, also known as clique analysis, alongside E. O. Wilson.

When were the terms 'Cladistics' and 'cladogram' officially coined?

The terms 'Cladistics' and 'cladogram' were coined in 1966, as noted in Webster's dictionary.

Who developed the first branch-swapping search strategy for phylogenetic trees, and when?

The first branch-swapping search strategy, Nearest Neighbor Interchange (NNI), was developed independently by Robinson and Moore et al. in 1971.

Who developed the PHYLIP software package, and what is its significance?

Joseph Felsenstein developed PHYLIP in 1980, which was the first software package for phylogenetic analysis. It provides free computational programs for inferring evolutionary trees, such as rooted trees like the 'drawgram' example.

What was Joseph Felsenstein's contribution to Maximum Likelihood methods in 1981?

In 1981, Joseph Felsenstein created the Felsenstein Maximum Likelihood method, which was the first computationally efficient ML algorithm for phylogenetics. This method evaluates evolutionary hypotheses based on the probability that a proposed model and history would produce the observed data.

When was the first cladistic analysis of eukaryotes based on combined phenotypic and genotypic evidence performed, and by whom?

The first cladistic analysis of eukaryotes based on combined phenotypic and genotypic evidence was performed by Diana Lipscomb in 1985.

When did the first issue of the journal *Cladistics* appear?

The first issue of the journal *Cladistics* was published in 1985.

Who introduced the neighbor-joining method, and when?

The neighbor-joining method, a phenetic approach for reconstructing phylogenetic trees, was introduced by Saitou and Nei in 1987.

When were the first working methods for Bayesian Inference (BI) developed, and what computational technique did they use?

The first working methods for Bayesian Inference (BI) were independently developed in 1996 by Li, Mau, and Rannala and Yang, all utilizing Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques.

How is phylogenetic analysis used in biodiversity studies, particularly within the fungi family?

Phylogenetic analysis is applied to biodiversity studies, such as those within the fungi family, to understand the evolutionary history of various organism groups, identify relationships between different species, and predict future evolutionary changes. Advanced imagery systems and new analysis techniques help uncover more genetic relationships, aiding conservation efforts by identifying rare species beneficial to global ecosystems.

Phylogenetics Wiki: Phylogenetics: Charting the Tree of Life

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Defining Phylogenetics

The Science of Relationships

Phylogenetics is the biological discipline dedicated to studying the evolutionary history and relationships among organisms. It employs a process known as phylogenetic inference, which analyzes heritable traits—such as DNA sequences, protein amino acid sequences, or physical morphology—to deduce these connections. The ultimate goal is to understand the branching patterns of evolution over time.

The Phylogenetic Tree

The primary output of a phylogenetic analysis is a diagram called a phylogenetic tree. This branching diagram serves as a hypothesis about the evolutionary relationships among a group of organisms. The tips of the branches represent the observed entities (taxa), which can be living species or fossils. These trees can be:

Rooted: Indicates the hypothetical most recent common ancestor of all taxa on the tree, showing the direction of evolutionary time.
Unrooted: Illustrates the relatedness of the taxa without making an assumption about a common ancestor or the path of evolution.

A Component of Systematics

Phylogenetics is a crucial component of systematics, the broader field concerned with classifying organisms. By using similarities and differences in characteristics, phylogenetics provides the evolutionary framework that underpins modern biological classification. Its applications are central to understanding biodiversity, ecology, and the structure of genomes.

Taxonomy & Classification

From Linnaeus to DNA

Taxonomy is the science of identifying, naming, and classifying organisms. While its foundation was laid by Carolus Linnaeus in the 18th century using physical characteristics (phenotypes), modern classification has been revolutionized by biochemistry. Today, classifications are predominantly based on DNA sequence data, often in combination with traditional morphological evidence, to create a more accurate reflection of evolutionary history.

Schools of Thought

The degree to which classification should reflect evolutionary history is a subject of debate, leading to different taxonomic philosophies:

Phenetics: An approach that groups organisms based on overall similarity, ignoring evolutionary relationships. It is now largely obsolete.
Cladistics (Phylogenetic Systematics): A rigorous method that insists classification must strictly reflect phylogeny. It only recognizes groups based on shared, derived characters (synapomorphies).
Evolutionary Taxonomy: A synthetic approach that considers both the branching patterns of evolution (phylogeny) and the degree of evolutionary change to form classifications.

Inferring the Tree of Life

Computational Approaches

Modern phylogenetic inference relies heavily on computational methods that use an optimality criterion to find the "best" tree. These methods are based on mathematical models describing how character traits (like DNA bases) change over time. The most common approaches include:

Maximum Parsimony: Seeks the tree that requires the fewest evolutionary changes to explain the observed data.
Maximum Likelihood (ML): Calculates the probability of the observed data given a specific tree and evolutionary model, selecting the tree that maximizes this probability.
Bayesian Inference: Uses Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods to determine the probability of a tree being correct, given the data and a model of evolution.

Distance-Matrix Methods

An older approach, associated with phenetics, involves using distance-matrix methods. These algorithms, such as Neighbor-Joining, calculate a measure of overall similarity or distance between pairs of taxa. They then construct a tree that best represents these pairwise distances. While computationally fast, they are often considered less robust than character-based methods like ML or Bayesian inference, but remain useful for tasks like analyzing DNA barcodes.

The Art of Taxon Sampling

More Taxa or More Genes?

A central debate in phylogenetics concerns the best strategy for collecting data. Given limited resources, should researchers sample more species (taxa) or more genetic data (genes) from fewer species? Research suggests that increasing the number of nucleotide sites sampled per taxon often yields more accurate and replicable results than simply adding more taxa with less genetic data for each. This is because more genetic data provides a stronger signal to resolve evolutionary relationships accurately.

The Peril of Long Branches

Poor taxon sampling can lead to significant errors in phylogenetic inference. One of the most well-known problems is Long Branch Attraction (LBA). This occurs when rapidly evolving lineages are incorrectly grouped together as sister taxa, not because they share a recent common ancestor, but because they have independently accumulated many similar-looking changes (homoplasies) by chance. Breaking up long branches by adding more intermediate taxa is a key strategy to combat LBA.

A History of Phylogenetic Thought

Early Concepts

The term "phylogeny" was coined by Ernst Haeckel in 1866, but the underlying concepts are much older. The principle of parsimony ("Occam's razor"), which favors the simplest explanation, was articulated by William of Ockham in the 14th century and traces back to Aristotle. Early evolutionary ideas from thinkers like Lamarck and the first branching diagrams from Darwin and Hitchcock set the stage for a formal science of evolutionary relationships.

Haeckel's Rejected Theory

In the late 19th century, Ernst Haeckel proposed the "biogenetic law," famously summarized as "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny." This theory suggested that an organism's development from embryo to adult mirrors the evolutionary stages of its ancestors. While influential, this idea has been thoroughly rejected. Instead, modern evolutionary developmental biology ("evo-devo") recognizes that developmental processes themselves evolve, and shared embryonic features are valuable data for inferring relationships.

Milestones in Phylogenetics

The journey of phylogenetics is marked by key theoretical and technological advances that transformed it into a rigorous, computational science.

1837: Charles Darwin sketches his first evolutionary tree in his notebooks, visualizing the concept of common descent.
1858: Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace co-publish their theory of evolution by natural selection.
1866: Ernst Haeckel coins the term "phylogeny" and publishes one of the first detailed evolutionary trees.
1950: Willi Hennig publishes his foundational work, formalizing the principles of phylogenetic systematics (cladistics).
1963: A.W.F. Edwards and L.L. Cavalli-Sforza make the first attempt to use maximum likelihood for phylogenetic inference.
1965: The first computer algorithms for cladistic analysis are developed, marking the beginning of computational phylogenetics.
1980: Joseph Felsenstein releases PHYLIP, the first widely available software package for phylogenetic analysis.
1987: The neighbor-joining method, a fast and popular distance-based algorithm, is introduced by Saitou and Nei.
1996: The first practical methods for Bayesian inference in phylogenetics are developed, utilizing MCMC algorithms.

Applications of Phylogenetics

Medicine and Pharmacology

Phylogenetics is a powerful tool in medical research. In oncology, it helps trace the clonal evolution of cancer cells, revealing how tumors mutate and develop resistance to treatment. In pharmacology, it guides drug discovery by identifying species closely related to those known to produce medically useful compounds. For example, screening relatives of venomous animals has led to the discovery of novel compounds for drugs like ACE inhibitors.

Forensics and Epidemiology

Phylogenetic tools are used in forensic science to analyze DNA evidence. "HIV forensics," for instance, tracks viral gene mutations to determine the relatedness of infections in legal cases. In public health, phylodynamics combines genomic data with epidemiological models to reconstruct transmission patterns of infectious diseases, such as during an outbreak, informing strategies to control their spread.

Beyond Biology

The principles of phylogenetics have been successfully applied to disciplines outside of biology to study how information is transmitted and changed over time.

Linguistics: Historical linguists use phylogenetic methods to reconstruct the evolution of languages. By treating cognates (words with a common origin) as characters, they can build family trees of languages, like the Indo-European language tree, and test hypotheses about their origins and relationships.
Textual Criticism: The history of manuscripts can be traced phylogenetically. Scribes copying texts introduce small errors ('mutations'), and by comparing different versions, scholars can reconstruct a "family tree" of manuscripts to infer the original text.
Archaeology: Archaeologists apply phylogenetic methods to trace the evolution of cultural artifacts, such as pottery styles, arrowhead designs, or hand-axes, to understand how technologies and cultural traditions were transmitted and modified among ancient populations.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "Phylogenetics" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about phylogenetics while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

western united states

References

Bock, W. J. (2004). Explanations in systematics. Pp. 49â56. In Williams, D. M. and Forey, P. L. (eds) Milestones in Systematics. London: Systematics Association Special Volume Series 67. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.

D. L. Swofford and G. J. Olsen. 1990. Phylogeny reconstruction. In D. M. Hillis and G. Moritz (eds.), Molecular Systematics, pages 411â501. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.

A full list of references for this article are available at the Phylogenetics Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for educational and informational purposes only. The content is derived from a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not professional scientific advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for consultation with qualified biologists, geneticists, or other scientific professionals. The concepts discussed are complex and should be further explored through academic literature and expert consultation. Never disregard professional scientific advice because of something you have read on this website.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.

Phylogenetics Unveiled

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

Defining Phylogenetics 🧬

🔬 The Science of Relationships

🌳 The Phylogenetic Tree

🧩 A Component of Systematics

Taxonomy & Classification 📋

📜 From Linnaeus to DNA

🤔 Schools of Thought

Inferring the Tree of Life ⚙️

💻 Computational Approaches

📏 Distance-Matrix Methods

The Art of Taxon Sampling 🎯

🔍 More Taxa or More Genes?

⚡ The Peril of Long Branches

A History of Phylogenetic Thought 📜

💡 Early Concepts

🔄 Haeckel's Rejected Theory

🗓️ Milestones in Phylogenetics

Applications of Phylogenetics 🌍

💊 Medicine and Pharmacology

⚖️ Forensics and Epidemiology

🏛️ Beyond Biology

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

Defining Phylogenetics

The Science of Relationships

The Phylogenetic Tree

A Component of Systematics

Taxonomy & Classification

From Linnaeus to DNA

Schools of Thought

Inferring the Tree of Life

Computational Approaches

Distance-Matrix Methods

The Art of Taxon Sampling

More Taxa or More Genes?

The Peril of Long Branches

A History of Phylogenetic Thought

Early Concepts

Haeckel's Rejected Theory

Milestones in Phylogenetics

Applications of Phylogenetics

Medicine and Pharmacology

Forensics and Epidemiology

Beyond Biology

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Disclaimer

Important Notice