What is the fundamental definition of plurality voting?

Plurality voting refers to electoral systems where candidates in an electoral district who receive more votes than any other single candidate, meaning they achieve a plurality, are elected. This is a common method used in many elections worldwide.

What is the common name for single-member district plurality voting?

Single-member district plurality voting, often abbreviated as SMP, is widely known as first-past-the-post (FPTP). In this system, the candidate with the highest number of votes wins, regardless of whether they secure an absolute majority.

How does first-past-the-post (FPTP) differ from a majority system like the two-round system?

In FPTP, the candidate with the most votes wins, even if they do not have over 50% of the votes. In contrast, a two-round system typically requires a candidate to achieve an absolute majority (more than half the votes) to win in the first round; if not, the top two candidates proceed to a second round (runoff) where a majority is usually achieved.

What is plurality block voting?

Plurality block voting is a multi-winner electoral system where voters cast as many votes as there are seats to fill in a district. The candidates who receive the most votes are elected, often resulting in the dominant party winning all seats if their supporters vote along party lines.

What is limited voting in the context of multi-winner plurality systems?

Limited voting is a semi-proportional system for multi-member districts where voters cast more votes than one, but fewer votes than the number of seats available. This method allows for some representation of minority parties within a district.

How does the single non-transferable vote (SNTV) system function in multi-winner districts?

In the single non-transferable vote system, voters cast only one vote in a multi-member district, even though multiple winners are to be elected. While appearing similar to FPTP, it functions as a semi-proportional system, potentially allowing for mixed representation and the election of minority parties.

What is party block voting (or general ticket plurality)?

Party block voting, also known as general ticket plurality, is a list-based plurality system in multi-member districts. In this system, the party that receives the most votes wins all the seats available in that district.

What are 'wasted votes' in the context of plurality voting systems?

Wasted votes are those cast for candidates who do not win the election or are in excess of what is needed to win. Plurality systems, particularly FPTP, are criticized for generating a high number of wasted votes, as votes for losing candidates or surplus votes for winners do not contribute to representation.

How does the spoiler effect manifest in plurality voting?

The spoiler effect occurs when a candidate with similar political views to a major candidate draws votes away from that major candidate. This can inadvertently lead to the election of a candidate who is less preferred by the voters who supported the spoiler, especially in systems with only one winner.

What is tactical voting, and how is it encouraged by plurality systems?

Tactical voting is when a voter casts a ballot not for their most preferred candidate, but for another candidate who is more likely to win, to influence the election outcome. Plurality systems often pressure voters to support one of the two leading candidates, even if they are not their first choice, to avoid 'wasting' their vote.

What is gerrymandering, and how does it relate to plurality voting?

Gerrymandering is the manipulation of electoral district boundaries to unfairly increase the number of seats a particular party wins. Plurality voting systems, due to their high incidence of wasted votes, are particularly susceptible to gerrymandering, as boundaries can be drawn to create safe seats or dilute opposition votes.

What is Duverger's Law, and how does it apply to plurality voting?

Duverger's Law posits that electoral systems using first-past-the-post (a type of plurality voting) tend to lead to a two-party system over time. This is because smaller parties struggle to gain representation, discouraging voters from supporting them and reinforcing the dominance of the two major parties.

How can plurality voting systems contribute to fewer political parties?

Plurality voting systems, especially FPTP, create a high barrier for smaller parties to gain representation. This discourages voters from supporting them and encourages a consolidation of votes around the two most viable parties, thus reducing the overall number of political parties.

What is the relationship between plurality voting and voter turnout?

Studies suggest that plurality voting systems can lead to political apathy and lower voter turnout. Voters may feel their vote has little impact, especially in safe seats or when their preferred candidate has little chance of winning, leading to a perception that their participation is not valued.

What did Sir Peter Kenilorea comment on regarding the first-past-the-post system in the Solomon Islands?

Sir Peter Kenilorea observed that the first-past-the-post system in the Solomon Islands contributed to political instability. He noted that candidates could be elected with a small percentage of votes, leading voters to ignore political parties and candidates to focus on material desires rather than policy, and also made elections susceptible to corrupt practices like ballot buying.

What are the primary arguments in favor of plurality voting systems?

Arguments for plurality voting often highlight its simplicity and familiarity for voters and election officials. It is also praised for its ease of balloting and counting, and the single-member variant is defended for providing constituency representation and promoting governmental stability.

How does plurality voting compare to other systems regarding the 'Independence of Clones' criterion?

Plurality voting systems, particularly FPTP, generally fail the 'Independence of Clones' criterion. This means that the addition or removal of similar, non-winning candidates (spoilers) can change the election outcome, which is not the case for more robust systems.

What is the 'Majority criterion' in electoral systems, and does plurality voting satisfy it?

The Majority criterion states that if a candidate is the first choice of a majority of voters, they should win the election. Plurality voting systems, by definition, do not always satisfy this criterion, as a candidate can win with only a plurality (less than a majority) of votes.

How does plurality voting's ease of counting compare to systems like instant-runoff voting?

Plurality voting is generally easier to count because votes are tallied directly for each candidate without complex transfers or re-evaluations. Systems like instant-runoff voting require more complex, often centralized, counting processes involving vote transfers.

What is the 'efficiency gap' in the context of gerrymandering and plurality voting?

The efficiency gap is a metric used to measure gerrymandering by calculating the difference between a party's wasted votes and its opponent's wasted votes, then dividing by the total votes cast. It has been considered by the U.S. Supreme Court as a way to identify unfair district manipulation.

In the Tennessee capital example, how did the plurality system lead to a seemingly counter-intuitive outcome?

In the Tennessee example, Memphis won the capital election with 42% of the vote, despite 58% of voters preferring it least. This occurred because voters in other cities voted for their closest option, allowing Memphis to secure a plurality, illustrating how FPTP can elect a candidate not preferred by the majority.

What is the difference between plurality block voting and single non-transferable vote (SNTV) in terms of voter input?

In plurality block voting, voters can cast as many votes as there are seats, while in single non-transferable vote (SNTV), voters can only cast one vote, even in a multi-winner district. Both systems elect the candidates with the most votes, but the number of votes a voter can cast differs.

How does the UK's use of first-past-the-post voting affect the number of political parties represented in Parliament?

The UK's FPTP system tends to create a two-party system, where larger parties dominate and smaller parties struggle for representation. This is evident in instances where parties like UKIP and the Green Party received significant vote shares but won very few seats, contrasting with parties whose support is geographically concentrated.

What electoral system does the United Kingdom primarily use for general elections?

The United Kingdom primarily uses the first-past-the-post (FPTP) electoral system for its general elections. This system is also used for local government elections in England and Wales.

What was the outcome of the 2011 referendum in the UK regarding electoral reform?

In 2011, the United Kingdom held a referendum on switching to the Alternative Vote (AV) system, a type of ranked-choice voting. British voters rejected this change by a margin of approximately 2-to-1.

Which countries, besides the UK and US, are noted for using plurality voting?

Canada is also noted for using first-past-the-post (FPTP) for its national and provincial elections. India is another country where plurality voting is prevalent.

What is the 'spoiler effect' in the context of the 2000 US Presidential Election, as mentioned in the text?

The text suggests that in the 2000 US Presidential Election, Ralph Nader's candidacy might have acted as a spoiler. Some voters who preferred Al Gore over George W. Bush but saw Nader as unlikely to win, may have voted for Nader, potentially drawing enough votes away from Gore to allow Bush to win.

What is the 'no favorite betrayal' criterion, and how do plurality systems fare against it?

The 'no favorite betrayal' criterion means voters should not have to rank another candidate higher than their favorite to achieve a preferred outcome. Plurality systems generally fail this criterion, as voters may need to vote strategically (tactically) rather than sincerely to influence the result.

How does plurality voting's tendency towards fewer parties impact government policy?

When plurality voting leads to a dominant single-party majority, the government may not consider as wide a range of perspectives. This can result in policy changes favored by only a plurality of voters, whereas multi-party systems often require broader consensus for significant policy shifts.

What is the 'Independence of irrelevant alternatives' criterion, and how does plurality voting relate to it?

The Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA) criterion states that the outcome of an election should not change if a non-winning candidate is added or removed. While not explicitly detailed for plurality in this section, the text implies that plurality systems can be susceptible to manipulation and strategic voting, which often violates IIA principles.

What are the main types of plurality voting systems for multi-winner districts?

The main types of plurality voting systems for multi-winner districts include plurality block voting, limited voting, and single non-transferable vote (SNTV). Party block voting is also a list-based plurality system for multi-member districts.

What is the significance of the 'winner-takes-all' principle in single-member plurality systems?

The 'winner-takes-all' principle in single-member plurality systems means that the winning candidate receives all the representation for that district, and the votes for losing candidates are effectively disregarded. This can lead to significant disproportionality between the popular vote and the seat allocation.

How do proportional representation (PR) systems differ from plurality systems in terms of vote wastage?

Proportional representation systems aim to ensure that the number of seats a party wins closely reflects its share of the popular vote, thereby minimizing wasted votes. Plurality systems, conversely, often result in a large proportion of votes being cast for losing candidates or being surplus to requirements for winners.

What is the 'spoiler effect' as described in the context of plurality voting?

The spoiler effect in plurality voting occurs when a candidate, often from a smaller party with similar views to a major candidate, draws votes away from that major candidate. This can lead to the election of a candidate who would not have won if the spoiler candidate had not been present.

What is the 'efficiency gap' as a measure of gerrymandering?

The efficiency gap quantifies gerrymandering by calculating the difference between the wasted votes cast for each of the two major parties, divided by the total votes cast. A significant efficiency gap suggests that district boundaries have been drawn to unfairly favor one party.

According to Duverger's Law, what is the predicted outcome for party systems under plurality voting?

Duverger's Law predicts that plurality voting systems, particularly first-past-the-post, will encourage the development of a two-party system. This occurs because voters tend to support the most viable candidates to avoid wasting their vote, reinforcing the dominance of the two largest parties.

What is the primary criticism leveled against plurality voting regarding voter turnout?

A primary criticism is that plurality voting systems can foster political apathy and reduce voter turnout. Voters may feel their vote is unlikely to influence the outcome, especially in safe seats, leading to a sense that their participation is not valued.

How does the UK's 2011 referendum on electoral reform relate to plurality voting?

The 2011 UK referendum proposed replacing the first-past-the-post (a plurality system) with the Alternative Vote system. The referendum ultimately resulted in the rejection of this electoral reform.

What is the difference between 'plurality' and 'majority' in voting?

A plurality means receiving the most votes, but not necessarily more than half of the total votes. A majority means receiving more than half of the total votes cast.

What are the key characteristics of the Tennessee capital election example used to illustrate plurality voting?

The Tennessee example involves four cities competing to be the capital, with voters concentrated in each city preferring their local option. The plurality system resulted in Memphis winning with 42% of the vote, even though a majority of voters preferred other cities, highlighting the potential for non-majority winners.

How does the 'party block voting' system differ from 'plurality block voting'?

While both are multi-winner plurality systems, party block voting (or general ticket) is list-based, where a party's slate wins all seats if the party wins the plurality. Plurality block voting allows voters to cast votes for individual candidates, and the top candidates win, often leading to the dominant party securing all seats.

What is the 'winner-takes-all' principle in the context of single-member plurality voting?

The winner-takes-all principle means that in a single-member district, only the candidate with the most votes wins the seat, and all other candidates receive no representation for that district, regardless of how many votes they received.

What is the 'Independence of clones' criterion, and why do plurality systems often fail it?

The 'Independence of Clones' criterion ensures that the addition or removal of very similar candidates (clones) does not change the election outcome. Plurality systems often fail this because similar candidates can split the vote, allowing a less popular candidate to win, demonstrating the 'spoiler effect'.

What is the 'no favorite betrayal' criterion, and how does it apply to plurality voting?

The 'no favorite betrayal' criterion means voters should not be penalized for voting sincerely for their favorite candidate. Plurality systems can violate this, as voters might feel compelled to vote tactically for a less-preferred but more viable candidate to prevent an even less desirable outcome.

How does the concept of 'safe seats' relate to plurality voting systems?

In plurality systems, particularly FPTP, certain electoral districts consistently vote for the same party, creating 'safe seats'. This can discourage voters from participating or voting for opposition candidates, as the outcome is perceived as predetermined.

What is the 'efficiency gap' and how is it used to assess gerrymandering?

The efficiency gap measures gerrymandering by comparing the 'wasted votes' for competing parties. It is calculated as the difference in wasted votes divided by the total votes cast, providing a metric to identify potentially unfair district boundary manipulations.

What are the arguments for the simplicity of plurality voting systems?

Plurality voting is considered simple because it is widely known and understood by voters and election officials. The balloting process, often involving marking a single candidate, and the vote counting are generally straightforward compared to more complex systems.

How does plurality voting's tendency towards a two-party system affect the diversity of political perspectives represented?

By favoring larger parties and disadvantaging smaller ones, plurality systems can limit the range of political viewpoints and concerns considered by the government. Voters may find that major parties offer similar platforms, leaving little room to express dissenting opinions through their vote.

What is the 'spoiler effect' in the context of elections with multiple similar candidates?

The spoiler effect occurs when a candidate, often from a smaller party, draws votes away from a major candidate with similar political views. This can lead to the election of a candidate who is less preferred by the voters who supported the spoiler, thereby altering the election's outcome.

What is the 'majority criterion' in electoral systems, and does plurality voting always satisfy it?

The majority criterion states that if a candidate is the preferred choice of a majority of voters, they should win the election. Plurality voting does not always satisfy this, as a candidate can win with only a plurality (the most votes, but not necessarily over 50%) of the vote.

What is the 'no favorite betrayal' criterion, and how might plurality voting violate it?

The 'no favorite betrayal' criterion means voters should not be disadvantaged for voting sincerely for their favorite candidate. Plurality systems can violate this because voters might feel compelled to vote tactically for a more viable candidate to prevent an undesirable outcome, thus betraying their true preference.

Plurality Voting Wiki: The Plurality Principle: Navigating Electoral Systems

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

What is Plurality Voting?

Core Definition

Plurality voting refers to electoral systems where candidates receiving more votes than any other single opponent win, irrespective of whether they achieve an absolute majority (more than 50%) of the total votes cast. This system is widely known as "first-past-the-post" (FPTP) in single-winner contexts.

Historical Context

Its prevalence, particularly in English-speaking nations, stems from its dissemination via the British Empire. While common, it is less popular globally than runoff voting systems and is often contrasted with proportional representation (PR) systems, which are more common worldwide.

System Variants

Plurality rules are applied in various ways across different electoral contexts:

Single-Winner: Typically "first-past-the-post" (FPTP) in single-member districts.
Multi-Winner: Includes block voting, limited voting, and single non-transferable vote (SNTV), each with distinct rules on how voters cast their ballots.

Electoral Procedures

Single-Winner Systems

In single-winner plurality voting (FPTP), each voter selects one candidate. The candidate with the highest number of votes wins the seat, even without a majority. This simplicity contrasts with majority systems like the two-round system, which require a candidate to secure over half the votes to win.

When applied to legislative bodies with single-member districts, FPTP means the winner represents the entire district. While straightforward for voters and administrators, it can lead to contentious district boundary drawing (gerrymandering) and may result in electoral inversion, where the party with the most votes does not win the most seats.

Multi-Winner Systems

In multi-member districts, the 'n' candidates with the most votes win, where 'n' is the number of seats available. The complexity arises from how voters cast their votes:

Block Voting: Voters can cast as many votes as there are seats, often leading to the dominant party winning all seats.
Limited Voting: Voters cast fewer votes than the number of seats.
Single Non-Transferable Vote (SNTV): Voters cast only one vote, making it semi-proportional and sensitive to vote splitting.

These systems, while using plurality rules, can yield different representation outcomes. SNTV, for instance, can allow minority representation but is vulnerable to inefficiencies if candidates are not strategically nominated.

Ballot Types

Handwritten Ballots

The simplest form involves voters writing candidate names by hand on a blank ballot. This method offers flexibility but can be prone to errors in interpretation during counting.

Structured Ballots

More commonly, ballots list candidates, allowing voters to mark their preference. While typically allowing only one mark for single-winner plurality, variations exist for multi-winner systems. These ballots may also include spaces for write-in candidates.

Example Plurality Ballot — An illustrative representation of a structured plurality ballot.

Illustrative Examples

Single-Winner: Tennessee Capital

Consider Tennessee's election for its capital. With voters prioritizing proximity, the distribution of preferences is key:

42% Voters Far-West	26% Voters Center	15% Voters Center-East	17% Voters Far-East
1. Memphis 2. Nashville 3. Chattanooga 4. Knoxville	1. Nashville 2. Chattanooga 3. Knoxville 4. Memphis	1. Chattanooga 2. Knoxville 3. Nashville 4. Memphis	1. Knoxville 2. Chattanooga 3. Nashville 4. Memphis

Under naive plurality voting, Memphis wins with 42% of the vote, despite being the least preferred option for 58% of voters. This highlights the system's potential to elect a candidate without majority support.

Multi-Winner: UK Election Simulation

In a 3-member district with 10,000 voters, different plurality methods yield varied results:

Candidate	Party		Plurality Block Voting				Limited Voting (2 votes)				Single Non-Transferable Vote (1 vote)
Candidate	Party		Votes	%	Elected?		Votes	%	Elected?		Votes	%	Elected?
A1		Party A	3700	37%	1.	Yes	3500	35%	1.	Yes	2000	20%	1.	Yes
A2		Party A	3600	36%	2.	Yes	1900	19%	2.	Yes	800	8%	4.
A3		Party A	3555	36%	3.	Yes	1800	18%	4.		700	7%	7.
B1		Party B	2600	26%	4.		1950	20%	3.	Yes	1100	11%	2.	Yes
B2		Party B	2500	25%	5.		1750	18%	4.		900	9%	3.	Yes
B3		Party B	2400	24%	6.		1425	14%	7.		400	4%	12.
I1		Independent	2300	23%	8.		1400	14%	8.		800	8%	4.
I2		Independent	2395	24%	7.		1500	15%	6.		800	8%	4.
I3		Independent	1900	19%	9.		1300	13%	9.		700	7%	7.
I4		Independent	1800	15%	10.		1200	12%	10.		700	7%	7.
I5		Independent	650	7%	11.		625	6%	11.		600	6%	10.
I6		Independent	600	6%	12.		550	6%	12.		500	5%	11.
TOTAL votes cast			28000				19000				10000
TOTAL possible votes			30000				20000				10000
Voters			10000	100%			10000	100%			10000	100%

Block voting often results in a landslide for the largest party. Limited voting can allow for broader representation, while SNTV, though still susceptible to vote splitting, offers more nuanced outcomes.

Critical Issues and Criticisms

Wasted Votes

A significant drawback is the prevalence of "wasted votes"—those cast for losing candidates or surplus votes for winners. In FPTP, roughly half the votes are typically wasted, leading to inefficient representation and potentially skewing outcomes.

The "efficiency gap" quantifies this waste, measuring the difference in wasted votes between parties. Alternative systems like proportional representation aim to minimize vote wastage, ensuring more votes contribute to electing representatives.

Tactical Voting

Plurality systems strongly encourage tactical voting, where voters cast ballots not for their preferred candidate but for a more viable one to prevent an undesirable outcome. This distorts the reflection of genuine public preference.

Examples like the 2000 US Presidential election suggest that votes for third-party candidates can inadvertently help elect a voter's least-preferred major candidate. Media influence and perceived electability heavily shape voting behavior.

Spoiler Effect

The "spoiler effect" is pronounced, where candidates with similar ideologies split votes, inadvertently aiding a dissimilar opponent. Even minor parties can significantly alter election results by drawing votes away from major contenders.

Gerrymandering

Plurality systems are susceptible to gerrymandering, the manipulation of electoral district boundaries to favor a particular party. This practice can create "safe seats" and further distort representation based on popular vote share.

Fewer Parties & Low Turnout

Duverger's Law posits that plurality systems tend to foster two-party dominance, disadvantaging smaller parties and limiting voter choice. This can also contribute to political apathy and lower voter turnout, as citizens may feel their vote has little impact.

Arguments for Plurality

Simplicity & Familiarity

Plurality voting is widely recognized for its straightforwardness. Its long-standing use in many countries makes it familiar to voters, reducing the need for extensive public education compared to more complex systems.

Ease of Balloting & Counting

The process of marking a ballot and counting votes is generally uncomplicated. This ease facilitates efficient administration, particularly in large-scale elections.

Constituency Representation

A key argument, especially for single-member plurality (SMP), is direct constituency representation. Each geographic area has a dedicated representative, fostering a connection between constituents and their elected official.

Governmental Stability

Proponents argue that plurality systems often produce single-party majority governments, leading to more stable and decisive governance compared to coalition governments often formed under proportional representation systems.

Comparison to Other Systems

Key Attributes

Plurality systems contrast sharply with others on several criteria:

Majority Criterion: Plurality systems do not guarantee that a candidate preferred by a majority will win.
Independence of Clones: Highly susceptible to the spoiler effect, where similar candidates can alter outcomes.
No Favorite Betrayal: Voters often need to vote tactically, not sincerely, to achieve a preferred outcome.

System	Ballot Type	Representation	Majority Criterion	Independence of Clones	No Favorite Betrayal
FPTP	Mark 1	Majoritarian	Yes	No (Spoilers)	No
Approval	Mark Any	Majoritarian	Yes	Yes	No
Block Voting	Mark N	Majoritarian	Yes	No (Spoilers, Crowds)	No
Limited Voting	Mark k	Semi-proportional	Yes	No (Spoilers, Crowds)	No
SNTV	Mark 1	Semi-proportional	Yes	No (Spoilers, Crowds)	No
Party Block	Mark 1 (List)	Majoritarian	Yes	No (Spoilers)	No
STV	Rank	Proportional	Yes	Yes	Yes
Score Voting	Score	Proportional	Yes	Yes	Yes

Plurality vs. Non-Plurality

Non-plurality systems, such as ranked choice (e.g., Single Transferable Vote - STV) or score voting, often address plurality's weaknesses. They typically involve voters ranking or scoring candidates, allowing for vote transfers or more nuanced preference expression, thereby reducing wasted votes and tactical voting.

While plurality is simple, it can lead to disproportionate results and strategic voting. Ranked or scored systems aim for greater proportionality and more sincere voting, though they may introduce complexities in ballot design and vote counting.

Global Prevalence

United Kingdom

The UK utilizes FPTP for general elections, contributing to a historically two-party dominant system. Despite debates and referendums (e.g., on Alternative Vote), FPTP remains the primary system.

Canada

Canada also employs FPTP for federal and provincial elections, though it has seen a more multi-party landscape than the US. Provincial referendums on electoral reform have generally favored retaining FPTP.

United States

The US predominantly uses single-member plurality for congressional elections and many state-level contests. This system is often cited as a key factor in its entrenched two-party system.

Worldwide Distribution

Plurality voting is employed in numerous countries globally, particularly those with historical ties to the UK. However, a significant number of nations utilize proportional representation systems, reflecting a global trend towards more representative electoral models.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "Plurality Voting" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about plurality_voting while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

roman-dutch law

photosystem i

christopher nolan

2011 northeast conference men's basketball tournament

animal rights

ecowas

the fall guy 2024 film

port of singapore

azua province

osaka

References

Roskin, Michael, Countries and Concepts (2007)

A full list of references for this article are available at the Plurality voting Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This content has been generated by an AI model for educational purposes, drawing upon publicly available data. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy and adherence to the source material, it may not be exhaustive or entirely up-to-date.

This is not professional political or electoral advice. The information provided should not substitute consultation with qualified political scientists, electoral experts, or legal professionals. Always verify information with primary sources and consult experts for specific applications.

The creators of this page are not liable for any errors, omissions, or actions taken based on the information presented herein.

The Plurality Principle

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

What is Plurality Voting? ℹ️

🗳️ Core Definition

🏛️ Historical Context

⚖️ System Variants

Electoral Procedures ⚙️

👤 Single-Winner Systems

👥 Multi-Winner Systems

Ballot Types 📝

✍️ Handwritten Ballots

✅ Structured Ballots

Illustrative Examples 📍

🇺🇸 Single-Winner: Tennessee Capital

🇬🇧 Multi-Winner: UK Election Simulation

Critical Issues and Criticisms ⚠️

🗑️ Wasted Votes

🤔 Tactical Voting

💥 Spoiler Effect

🗺️ Gerrymandering

📉 Fewer Parties & Low Turnout

Arguments for Plurality ✅

💡 Simplicity & Familiarity

🖨️ Ease of Balloting & Counting

🤝 Constituency Representation

🛡️ Governmental Stability

Comparison to Other Systems ⚖️

📊 Key Attributes

🆚 Plurality vs. Non-Plurality

Global Prevalence 🌍

🇬🇧 United Kingdom

🇨🇦 Canada

🇺🇸 United States

🌏 Worldwide Distribution

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

What is Plurality Voting?

Core Definition

Historical Context

System Variants

Electoral Procedures

Single-Winner Systems

Multi-Winner Systems

Ballot Types

Handwritten Ballots

Structured Ballots

Illustrative Examples

Single-Winner: Tennessee Capital

Multi-Winner: UK Election Simulation

Critical Issues and Criticisms

Wasted Votes

Tactical Voting

Spoiler Effect

Gerrymandering

Fewer Parties & Low Turnout

Arguments for Plurality

Simplicity & Familiarity

Ease of Balloting & Counting

Constituency Representation

Governmental Stability

Comparison to Other Systems

Key Attributes

Plurality vs. Non-Plurality

Global Prevalence

United Kingdom

Canada

United States

Worldwide Distribution

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Disclaimer

Important Notice