What is the primary focus of social choice theory?

Social choice theory is a branch of welfare economics that extends the theory of rational choice to collective decision-making. It studies the behavior of different mathematical procedures, known as social welfare functions, used to combine individual preferences into a coherent whole.

How does social choice theory differ from political science?

Social choice theory is a normative field, aiming to understand how societies *can* make good decisions. In contrast, political science is a descriptive field that observes and analyzes how societies *actually* make decisions.

What are some real-world examples where social choice rules are applied?

Real-world applications of social choice rules include constitutions and parliamentary procedures for voting on laws, as well as electoral systems used to select representatives or decide outcomes. These are practical implementations of how groups make collective decisions.

What other academic disciplines have contributed significantly to social choice theory?

While originating in economics and decision theory, social choice theory has benefited from substantial contributions from mathematics, philosophy, political science, and game theory, reflecting its interdisciplinary nature.

What is the relationship between social choice theory and mechanism design?

Social choice theory is closely related to mechanism design. Mechanism design uses game theory to model social choice scenarios, particularly when dealing with imperfect information and self-interested participants, aiming to design rules that achieve desired collective outcomes.

How does social choice theory differ from individual decision theory?

Decision theory focuses on how *individuals* make rational choices, whereas social choice theory is concerned with how *societies* or groups can make rational decisions by aggregating individual preferences.

Who is credited with formulating some of the earliest key results in social choice theory?

The Marquis de Condorcet is recognized for formulating some of the earliest significant results in social choice theory. These included his jury theorem and his demonstration of the impossibility of simple majority rule with three or more options.

What early manuscript is considered a precursor to modern social choice theory?

Ramon Llull's 1299 manuscript, *Ars Electionis* (The Art of Elections), is considered a precursor to modern social choice theory, as it discussed many of the same concepts that would later be explored in the field.

Which publication is widely recognized for inaugurating the modern era of social choice theory?

Kenneth Arrow's book, *Social Choice and Individual Values*, published in 1951, is widely recognized as inaugurating the modern era of social choice theory, laying much of the groundwork for subsequent research.

What are some of the later areas of research that expanded upon the foundations of social choice theory?

Later research in social choice theory has explored areas such as legal compensation, fair division of resources, decision-making with variable populations, partial strategy-proofing of mechanisms, the economics of natural resources, capabilities and functionings approaches, and measures of welfare.

What fundamental problem does Arrow's impossibility theorem address regarding social choice functions?

Arrow's impossibility theorem demonstrates that it is impossible to create a social choice function that satisfies a set of desirable criteria (like fairness, rationality, and non-dictatorship) when based solely on ordinal comparisons of preferences, unless the system is dictatorial. This means that any such system will inevitably behave incoherently or violate key principles.

What is the 'independence of irrelevant alternatives' and how does it relate to Arrow's theorem?

The independence of irrelevant alternatives is a condition stating that the social choice between two options should only depend on individual preferences between those two options, not on other available alternatives. Arrow's theorem shows that social choice functions based on ordinal preferences often violate this, leading to 'spoiler effects' where the introduction or removal of an option can change the outcome.

What is a 'Condorcet cycle,' and what property does it violate?

A Condorcet cycle occurs when, using majority rule, option A is preferred to option B, option B is preferred to option C, but option C is preferred to option A. This violates the transitive property, which requires that if A is preferred to B and B to C, then A must be preferred to C for preferences to be consistent.

How does May's theorem relate to Condorcet's findings on majority rule?

May's theorem provides a contrast to the issues raised by Condorcet's paradox. It shows that when there are only two outcomes and preferences are purely ordinal (ranked), simple majority rule is the only voting mechanism that is neutral, anonymous, and positively responsive.

What does Harsanyi's utilitarian theorem suggest about social welfare functions?

Harsanyi's utilitarian theorem suggests that if individuals' preferences are 'well-behaved under uncertainty' and coherent, the only social choice function that is both coherent and Pareto efficient is the utilitarian rule. This rule aims to maximize the sum of individual utilities.

What is the core idea behind Gibbard's theorem concerning voting rules?

Gibbard's theorem establishes limitations on the ability of voting rules to ensure honest preference revelation. It proves that for any voting rule with three or more possible outcomes, there will always be a situation where a voter can strategically misrepresent their preferences to achieve a better outcome for themselves.

What is the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem's implication for ranked-choice voting systems?

The Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem extends Gibbard's findings to ranked-choice voting systems, proving that no such system can be 'sincere' (meaning it's free from reversed preferences) when there are three or more outcomes. This implies that strategic voting or manipulation is often possible.

What is the role of the revelation principle in mechanism design?

The revelation principle, a key concept in mechanism design, states that for any social choice function that can be achieved through some mechanism, there exists another mechanism that can achieve the same results while incentivizing participants to reveal their preferences honestly.

How does the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism differ from standard voting in social choice theory?

The VCG mechanism, unlike standard voting, can achieve Pareto efficient outcomes and incentivize honest behavior by allowing agents to compensate each other for losses through monetary transfers. This capability makes it a more powerful decision-making tool than voting, provided such transfers are feasible.

What is the significance of selecting a Condorcet winner in social choice theory?

If a social choice domain is restricted to include a Condorcet winner (an option preferred by a majority over every other option), then selecting that winner is the unique voting rule that is resolvable, neutral, anonymous, and non-manipulable.

What is the central debate in social choice theory regarding individual preferences?

A central debate in social choice theory revolves around interpersonal utility comparison. This concerns whether the utility or happiness individuals derive from different states can be measured and compared across different people, which significantly impacts the types of social welfare functions that can be constructed.

What was Lionel Robbins' critique of interpersonal utility comparisons?

Lionel Robbins argued that concepts of utility were unscientific and unfalsifiable, questioning whether changes in one person's utility could be measured or even considered meaningful. He believed such comparisons were beyond the scope of positive science.

How did Amartya Sen and John Harsanyi respond to Robbins' critique?

Amartya Sen and John Harsanyi argued that while perfect comparisons of mental states might be impossible, people can still make partial comparisons of utility due to shared backgrounds and psychologies. They contended that social choice theory should proceed with the assumption that at least partial comparability is possible.

What is the utilitarian perspective on interpersonal utility comparison?

The utilitarian perspective, influenced by thinkers like Jeremy Bentham, holds that individual preferences and utility functions are interpersonally comparable. Utilitarians believe these utilities can be summed to measure aggregate utility, which should then be maximized for the greatest good.

What is the primary distinction between 'public choice' and 'social choice' theory?

Public choice theory primarily focuses on modeling existing political systems using positive economics to predict the behavior of political actors. Social choice theory, conversely, is more normative and abstract, focusing on the theoretical properties of decision procedures and how societies *should* make choices.

How are social choice theory and public choice theory classified by the Journal of Economic Literature (JEL)?

The Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) classifies Social Choice theory under Microeconomics at JEL D71 (covering clubs, committees, and associations), while Public Choice falls under JEL D72, which deals with economic models of political processes like rent-seeking, elections, and voting behavior.

What has been the dominant characteristic of social choice theory research since Kenneth Arrow?

Since Arrow's foundational work, social choice theory has been predominantly characterized by its mathematical and theoretical nature, focusing on abstract models and proofs rather than empirical observation.

What empirical research has been conducted in social choice theory?

Some research has aimed to empirically estimate the frequency of various voting paradoxes, such as the Condorcet paradox. Studies have analyzed real-world elections to quantify how often these theoretical issues manifest in practice.

What is the approximate likelihood of a Condorcet paradox occurring in elections, based on summarized studies?

Based on a summary of 37 studies covering 265 elections, the Condorcet paradox occurred in approximately 9.4% of cases, with 25 instances identified.

Where are Condorcet paradoxes more frequently observed, in small or large settings?

Condorcet paradoxes appear to occur more frequently in smaller settings, such as parliaments or committees. While examples have been found in larger groups like electorates, they are less common in those contexts.

What are the two most common types of social choice rules mentioned in the text?

The two most common types of social choice rules discussed are the Utilitarian rule, which aims to maximize the sum of utilities, and the Egalitarian rule, which seeks to maximize the minimum utility received by any individual.

What is another name for the Utilitarian rule in social choice theory?

The Utilitarian rule is also known as the max-sum rule or Benthamite welfare, reflecting its goal of maximizing the total utility across all individuals.

What is another name for the Egalitarian rule in social choice theory?

The Egalitarian rule is also referred to as the max-min rule or Rawlsian welfare, highlighting its focus on improving the well-being of the least well-off individual.

What defines a 'social choice function' in the context of voting systems?

A social choice function, often referred to as a voting system in politics, is a rule that takes individual preferences over a set of outcomes and selects a single outcome, or a set of tied outcomes. These functions are often evaluated based on the mathematical properties or axioms they satisfy.

What does May's theorem state about simple majority voting?

May's theorem states that simple majority voting is the unique voting rule that is neutral, anonymous, and positively responsive when there are only two candidates and preferences are expressed as rankings (ordinal utility).

What is the 'dictatorship mechanism' in the context of social choice functions?

The dictatorship mechanism is a social choice function where the preferences of a single designated voter determine the outcome, regardless of the preferences of all other voters. It is the only mechanism that satisfies strategyproofness and non-imposition for three or more outcomes, according to the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem.

What is 'strategyproofness' in the context of voting rules?

Strategyproofness refers to a property of a voting rule where voters have no incentive to misrepresent their true preferences. If a rule is strategyproof, voters are best off voting sincerely.

What is the 'revelation principle' in mechanism design?

The revelation principle, a key concept in mechanism design, states that for any social choice function that can be achieved through some mechanism, there exists a direct mechanism where truthful revelation of preferences is a dominant strategy for all participants.

What is the purpose of 'mechanism design' within social choice theory?

Mechanism design aims to identify and create rules or systems that achieve specific collective goals, such as fairness or efficiency, while also incentivizing participants to behave in a way that supports these goals, often by revealing their true preferences.

What is the 'common good' as identified by John Stuart Mill in relation to social choice?

John Stuart Mill identified the common good with the ideal of maximizing the collective utility or well-being of society as a whole, under the principle of equal consideration for everyone's interests. Harsanyi's theorem lends mathematical support to this viewpoint.

What does the term 'ordinal comparisons' refer to in Arrow's theorem?

Ordinal comparisons, in the context of Arrow's theorem, refer to preferences that only indicate which option is better than another (ranking), without specifying by how much. This is in contrast to cardinal utility, which attempts to quantify the intensity of preferences.

What is the significance of 'rational choice' in social choice theory?

Rational choice theory, which deals with how individuals make decisions to maximize their utility, serves as a foundation for social choice theory. Social choice theory extends these principles to group decision-making, examining how collective choices can be made logically and consistently.

What is 'mechanism design' in relation to social choice theory and game theory?

Mechanism design is a field that uses game theory to design rules for collective decision-making. It focuses on creating mechanisms that incentivize participants to reveal their true preferences and achieve desirable social outcomes, often by ensuring efficiency or fairness.

What is 'positive economics' as contrasted with 'normative economics' in the context of social choice theory?

Positive economics describes and explains economic phenomena as they are, focusing on 'what is.' Normative economics, which social choice theory largely employs, deals with value judgments and prescribes how things 'should be,' focusing on ideal decision-making processes.

What does the term 'strategyproofness' mean for a voting system?

A voting system is strategyproof if no voter can achieve a better outcome for themselves by misrepresenting their true preferences. In essence, the best strategy for a voter is always to vote sincerely.

What is the 'utilitarian rule' in social choice theory?

The utilitarian rule, also known as the max-sum rule, is a social choice method that aims to maximize the total sum of utilities across all individuals in a society.

What is the 'egalitarian rule' in social choice theory?

The egalitarian rule, also known as the max-min rule, is a social choice method that seeks to maximize the utility of the individual who receives the least utility. It prioritizes the well-being of the worst-off members of society.

What is the 'spoiler effect' in voting systems?

The spoiler effect occurs when a candidate or option, by drawing votes away from a more preferred but similar candidate, causes a less preferred candidate to win. This is a consequence of violating the independence of irrelevant alternatives, as shown in Arrow's theorem.

What is the 'transitive property' in the context of preferences?

The transitive property means that if an individual prefers option A to option B, and option B to option C, then they must also prefer option A to option C. This is a fundamental requirement for consistent preferences.

What is the 'Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem' about?

The Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem proves that for any voting system with three or more options, it is impossible to design a system that is both strategyproof (no incentive to lie) and non-dictatorial, meaning manipulation is always possible.

What is the 'median voter theorem' mentioned in the text?

The median voter theorem is mentioned as a key result in social choice theory, though its specific content is not detailed in this excerpt. It generally relates to the outcome of voting in certain political models.

Social Choice Theory Wiki: The Calculus of Consensus: Understanding Social Choice Theory

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

What is Social Choice Theory?

Bridging Individual and Collective

Social choice theory is a specialized branch within welfare economics that extends the principles of rational choice theory to the domain of collective decision-making. It investigates the diverse mathematical procedures, known as social welfare functions, used to aggregate individual preferences into a unified societal outcome.

Normative vs. Descriptive

While political science often adopts a descriptive approach, observing how societies *actually* make decisions, social choice theory is fundamentally normative. It focuses on how societies *can* and *should* make optimal decisions, analyzing the properties and potential pitfalls of various decision-making mechanisms.

Interdisciplinary Foundations

Originating in economics, the field has significantly benefited from contributions across mathematics, philosophy, political science, and game theory. This interdisciplinary nature highlights the complexity and broad applicability of understanding how groups arrive at decisions.

Historical Foundations

Early Insights

The earliest significant contributions trace back to the Marquis de Condorcet in the late 18th century. His work laid the groundwork with concepts like his jury theorem and the identification of paradoxes within majority rule, demonstrating its potential for cyclical outcomes.

Arrow's Revolution

The modern era of social choice theory was largely inaugurated by Kenneth Arrow's seminal 1951 work, Social Choice and Individual Values. His groundbreaking research introduced formal mathematical rigor and established foundational impossibility theorems that continue to shape the field.

Arrow's theorem demonstrated that no voting system, using only ordinal preferences (rankings), can simultaneously satisfy a set of seemingly reasonable fairness criteria when there are three or more options. This includes conditions like non-dictatorship, Pareto efficiency, and independence of irrelevant alternatives, highlighting inherent challenges in democratic aggregation.

Key Results and Theorems

Arrow's Impossibility Theorem

This foundational theorem reveals the inherent difficulties in aggregating individual preferences into a consistent collective choice. It proves that no social welfare function based solely on ordinal comparisons can satisfy a specific set of desirable criteria without being dictatorial, often leading to spoiler effects.

Condorcet Cycles

Condorcet's paradox illustrates how majority rule can lead to intransitive outcomes when more than two options are considered. This means society might prefer A over B, B over C, but paradoxically prefer C over A, violating the transitivity expected in rational decision-making.

While Condorcet's paradox highlights issues with majority rule for multiple options, May's theorem shows that simple majority voting is the unique optimal mechanism when only two outcomes are available and ordinal preferences are considered. It satisfies neutrality, anonymity, and positive responsiveness.

Harsanyi's Utilitarian Theorem

John Harsanyi's theorem provides a bridge between individual rationality and collective welfare. It suggests that if individuals' preferences are coherent under uncertainty, the only Pareto-efficient social choice function that respects equal consideration of interests is the utilitarian rule—maximizing the sum of individual utilities.

Manipulation Theorems

The Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem demonstrates that for any voting system with three or more options, it's impossible to prevent strategic manipulation (voting in a way that misrepresents true preferences) unless the system is a dictatorship.

Mechanism Design

This subfield uses game theory to design rules that incentivize honest preference revelation, even with self-interested agents. The revelation principle is key, showing that for any outcome achievable by any mechanism, there's a direct-incentive-compatible mechanism achieving the same result. The VCG mechanism is a notable example, enabling Pareto efficiency through monetary transfers.

Interpersonal Utility Comparisons

The Measurement Debate

A central question is whether individual utilities can be compared across people. Early utilitarians like Bentham argued for comparability, supporting wealth redistribution based on diminishing marginal utility. However, economists like Lionel Robbins questioned the scientific basis for such comparisons.

Partial Comparability

Amartya Sen and John Harsanyi argued that while perfect comparisons might be impossible, partial comparisons are feasible and meaningful. They contend that we can often assert, for instance, that a societal event had a negative overall impact, even if precise utility values are unknown.

Social Choice vs. Public Choice

Distinct Focus

While sharing similar names, public choice theory and social choice theory have different aims. Public choice applies microeconomic models to predict the behavior of political actors (like politicians and voters) in existing systems, focusing on positive analysis.

Normative Goals

In contrast, social choice theory is primarily normative, concerned with the abstract properties of decision-making procedures and how societies *should* make choices, rather than how they empirically do. It seeks to identify ideal or optimal rules.

Empirical Insights

Frequency of Paradoxes

Research has attempted to quantify the occurrence of voting paradoxes, such as the Condorcet paradox. Studies analyzing numerous real-world elections suggest that while these paradoxes can appear, their frequency varies significantly depending on factors like the number of options and the size of the electorate.

Core Decision Rules

Utilitarian Rule

Also known as the max-sum or Benthamite rule, this approach aims to maximize the total utility across all individuals in society. It assumes that individual utilities can be summed to find the collectively optimal outcome.

Egalitarian Rule

Alternatively called the max-min or Rawlsian rule, this principle focuses on maximizing the utility of the least well-off individual. It prioritizes fairness and the well-being of the most disadvantaged members of society.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "Social Choice Theory" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about social_choice_theory while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

battle of trebbia 1799

surface-to-air missile

References

A full list of references for this article are available at the Social choice theory Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not professional advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional consultation in economics, political science, mathematics, or any related field. Always refer to official documentation and consult with qualified professionals for specific applications or analysis.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.

The Calculus of Consensus

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

What is Social Choice Theory? ⚖️

🏛️ Bridging Individual and Collective

🧠 Normative vs. Descriptive

🌐 Interdisciplinary Foundations

Historical Foundations ⏳

📜 Early Insights

💡 Arrow's Revolution

Key Results and Theorems 💡

🚫 Arrow's Impossibility Theorem

🔄 Condorcet Cycles

🤝 Harsanyi's Utilitarian Theorem

✍️ Manipulation Theorems

🎯 Mechanism Design

Interpersonal Utility Comparisons 🧠

⚖️ The Measurement Debate

🤔 Partial Comparability

Social Choice vs. Public Choice 🏛️

🔬 Distinct Focus

📜 Normative Goals

Empirical Insights 📊

🔢 Frequency of Paradoxes

Core Decision Rules 📜

➕ Utilitarian Rule

min Egalitarian Rule

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

What is Social Choice Theory?

Bridging Individual and Collective

Normative vs. Descriptive

Interdisciplinary Foundations

Historical Foundations

Early Insights

Arrow's Revolution

Key Results and Theorems

Arrow's Impossibility Theorem

Condorcet Cycles

Harsanyi's Utilitarian Theorem

Manipulation Theorems

Mechanism Design

Interpersonal Utility Comparisons

The Measurement Debate

Partial Comparability

Social Choice vs. Public Choice

Distinct Focus

Normative Goals

Empirical Insights

Frequency of Paradoxes

Core Decision Rules

Utilitarian Rule

Egalitarian Rule

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Disclaimer

Important Notice