This is a visual explainer based on the Wikipedia article on The Shape of Water. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

Echoes in the Abyss: Deconstructing Guillermo del Toro's The Shape of Water

An academic exploration into the cinematic depths of otherness, empathy, and Cold War allegories.

Begin Analysis 👇 Explore Themes 💡

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Film Overview

A Visionary Dark Fantasy

The Shape of Water, a 2017 period romantic dark fantasy film, was both directed and produced by the acclaimed Guillermo del Toro, who also co-wrote the screenplay with Vanessa Taylor. This cinematic work is a co-production between the United States and Mexico, reflecting del Toro's distinctive cross-cultural artistic vision. It garnered significant critical attention, culminating in its premiere at the 74th Venice International Film Festival on August 31, 2017, where it was honored with the prestigious Golden Lion award.

Setting the Stage: 1962 Baltimore

The narrative unfolds in Baltimore, Maryland, in 1962, amidst the palpable tensions of the Cold War. The film centers on Elisa Esposito, a mute cleaner employed at a clandestine government laboratory. Her life takes an extraordinary turn when she develops a profound connection with a captive humanoid amphibian creature. This burgeoning relationship drives her to orchestrate a daring escape for the creature, saving him from the malevolent intentions of Colonel Richard Strickland.

Critical Acclaim and Accolades

Upon its release, The Shape of Water received widespread critical acclaim for its exceptional acting, intricate screenplay, masterful direction, stunning visuals, evocative production design, captivating cinematography, and memorable musical score. The American Film Institute recognized it as one of the top ten films of 2017. Its success culminated at the 90th Academy Awards, where it received a leading thirteen nominations and secured four wins, including Best Picture and Best Director. Notably, it became only the second fantasy film to ever win the Academy Award for Best Picture.

Narrative Arc

Elisa's Solitary World

In 1962 Baltimore, Elisa Esposito, a mute janitor with scars on her neck from infancy, navigates a solitary existence. She communicates through sign language, residing in an apartment above a cinema. Her only confidantes are Giles, her closeted middle-aged neighbor and advertising illustrator, and Zelda, her outspoken coworker. Their lives are routine until the arrival of a mysterious asset at the government laboratory where Elisa works.

A Bond Forged in Secrecy

Colonel Richard Strickland brings a unique captive to the facility: a humanoid amphibian creature, captured from a South American river. Elisa, through her clandestine visits, forms an extraordinary bond with this creature. However, driven by the Space Race, Strickland persuades General Frank Hoyt to authorize the vivisection of the Amphibian Man to study its respiratory system. Dr. Robert Hoffstetler, a Soviet spy masquerading as a scientist, attempts to preserve the creature for study while secretly being ordered by his handlers to eliminate it.

The Escape and Healing

Learning of the creature's impending fate, Elisa enlists Giles's reluctant help, who later agrees after facing personal and professional rejections. Hoffstetler also aids her, and eventually, Zelda joins the conspiracy. They successfully relocate the Amphibian Man to Elisa's apartment, where she keeps him in her bathtub, planning to release him into a canal during heavy rain. Strickland's interrogations yield no immediate results, but the creature's health deteriorates. During an encounter, the Amphibian Man slashes Giles's arm, but later heals it and even causes Giles's hair to regrow, revealing its restorative powers. Elisa and the creature's bond deepens, culminating in a romantic relationship.

Climax and Transformation

General Hoyt imposes a 36-hour deadline on Strickland to recover the creature. Hoffstetler, meeting his handlers, is shot by Strickland, who then tortures the dying spy for the creature's location. Strickland learns of Elisa's involvement through Zelda's husband and discovers her plan. At the canal, as Elisa and Giles prepare to release the creature, Strickland intervenes, shooting both the Amphibian Man and Elisa. Giles, regaining consciousness, fights Strickland, allowing the creature to heal itself and fatally slash Strickland's throat. The Amphibian Man then takes Elisa into the canal, where his healing touch transforms her neck scars into gills, reviving her. The film concludes with Elisa and the Amphibian Man embracing underwater, implying a shared existence beyond the human world.

Principal Cast

Leading Performances

The film features a stellar ensemble cast, with Sally Hawkins in the central role of Elisa Esposito. Her nuanced portrayal of a mute cleaner who finds love with an extraordinary being was critically lauded. Doug Jones, a frequent collaborator with del Toro, embodies the Amphibian Man, bringing a unique blend of animalistic grace and regal dignity to the character, despite the extensive prosthetics.

Supporting Ensemble

The supporting cast provides crucial depth to the narrative:

  • Michael Shannon as Richard Strickland, the film's antagonist, whose portrayal explores the darker aspects of human nature.
  • Richard Jenkins as Giles, Elisa's empathetic, closeted neighbor and friend.
  • Michael Stuhlbarg as Robert Hoffstetler, the conflicted scientist and Soviet spy.
  • Octavia Spencer as Zelda Delilah Fuller, Elisa's loyal coworker and interpreter.

Notable Appearances

Further enriching the film's tapestry are performances by:

  • Nick Searcy as General Frank Hoyt
  • David Hewlett as Fleming
  • Nigel Bennett as Mihalkov
  • Stewart Arnott as Bernard
  • Lauren Lee Smith as Elaine Strickland
  • Martin Roach as Brewster Fuller
  • John Kapelos as Mr. Arzoumanian
  • Morgan Kelly as Pie Guy
  • Wendy Lyon as Sally

Filmmaking Journey

Genesis of an Idea

The concept for The Shape of Water originated in December 2011 during a breakfast conversation between Guillermo del Toro and Daniel Kraus. Del Toro's primary inspiration stemmed from his childhood fascination with the 1954 film Creature from the Black Lagoon, specifically his desire to see the Gill-man and female lead, Kay Lawrence, achieve a successful romance. He had previously attempted to pitch a creature-centric remake of Creature from the Black Lagoon to Universal, but his vision of the creature and female lead ending up together was rejected by studio executives. The film also shares thematic similarities with the 2015 short film The Space Between Us.

Casting the Vision

Guillermo del Toro specifically wrote the lead role of Elisa Esposito with Sally Hawkins in mind, having admired her work in films like Fingersmith and Happy-Go-Lucky. He famously pitched the idea to her while at the 2014 Golden Globes. Hawkins prepared for the role by studying silent comedians such as Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton, with del Toro suggesting she observe Stan Laurel for his ability to convey "a state of grace without conveying it verbally." Doug Jones, a frequent collaborator with del Toro, was chosen to portray the Amphibian Man. Jones, initially apprehensive about the romantic aspect, embraced the challenge, practicing animalistic and regal movements, even drawing inspiration from matadors. The Amphibian Man's voice was crafted by sound editor Nathan Robitaille, blending his own vocalizations, animal sounds, and del Toro's breathing. Richard Jenkins was cast as Giles after Ian McKellen, the initial choice, was unavailable. Michael Shannon, cast as the villain Richard Strickland, engaged in early discussions with del Toro about how Strickland might have been perceived as a hero in a 1950s film, a concept that intrigued the actor. Octavia Spencer, playing Zelda, noted the irony that the mute protagonist's interpreters were characters from disenfranchised groups.

Filming Locations & Aesthetic Choices

Principal photography commenced on August 15, 2016, in Toronto and Hamilton, Ontario, concluding on November 6, 2016. The interior scenes of the Orpheum movie theater were filmed at Toronto's Elgin and Winter Garden Theatres, while the exterior utilized the façade of Massey Hall. Elisa and Giles's apartments, depicted as being above the Orpheum, were actually a set constructed at Cinespace Studios in West Toronto. Portions of the government laboratory were shot in the Humanities Wing of the John Andrews Building at the University of Toronto Scarborough. Del Toro initially contemplated shooting the film in black and white but ultimately opted for color when Fox Searchlight Pictures offered a larger budget for a color production. He expressed that while black and white would have been "luscious," color allowed for a more immersive, less postmodern reflection. Del Toro described the project as a "healing movie" that enabled him to explore themes of trust, otherness, sex, and love.

The Sonic Landscape

Composer Alexandre Desplat met with del Toro three years prior to the film's release to discuss its premise. After viewing a rough cut in January 2017, Desplat agreed to compose the score, perceiving the film as akin to a musical. He meticulously incorporated the sound of water to evoke a "warm feeling" associated with love, noting that the opening melody was "actually made of waves." The six-week composition process aimed to create a sense of immersion, making the audience feel as though they were floating. Two distinct melodies, including "Elisa's Theme," are introduced early in the film and gradually merge, with Desplat subtly altering the sounds of flutes, accordions, and whistles to achieve a "blurred" effect. He intentionally refrained from giving Strickland a distinct melody. The soundtrack was released on December 1, 2017, by Decca Records, and Desplat's work earned him the Academy Award for Best Original Score. Desplat remarked that working on such a beautiful film, which he considered a masterpiece, made his creative process significantly easier.

Thematic Depths

The Construction of the Other

The Shape of Water is meticulously crafted to interrogate societal perceptions of "the Other," both literally and metaphorically. The Amphibian Man, a creature abducted from the Amazon, transcends a mere monster-human romance to become a potent metaphor for marginalized individuals. Set against the backdrop of the Cold War and the Civil Rights Movement, the film highlights the lower social standing of Black people, people of color, individuals with disabilities, and LGBTQ+ communities in 1960s America. Viewers from marginalized groups are thus invited to empathize with the creature, seeing their own experiences reflected in his interactions with figures of authority. Elisa's acceptance of the creature, supported by Giles (a gay man) and Zelda (a Black woman), underscores a powerful solidarity among marginalized communities, echoing films like Tod Browning's Freaks. This collective resistance against oppressive external powers encourages viewers to consider their own capacity to challenge institutional brutality.

Humanizing the Monstrous

The film employs the concept of "monstrous entities" to foster intimacy and understanding of "foreigners." It contrasts the scientific perspective, which initially views the creature as a specimen until it demonstrates an understanding of human speech, with Elisa's profound empathy. This contrast suggests that societal acceptance often hinges on an individual's ability to conform to dominant communication norms. However, for Elisa, humanity transcends verbal communication; she and the creature are "both without words, they're speechless, and [yet they are] loved." The fairytale aesthetic further humanizes the creature, allowing audiences to look beyond his physical appearance and focus on his actions, which align with humanistic values. Unlike traditional monster-human romances, this creature is not required to die or become human to achieve acceptance and a "happily ever after." This narrative choice offers a message of hope to marginalized communities, emphasizing that assimilation is not a prerequisite for acceptance, and promoting reflection, acceptance, and the embrace of otherness. The film ultimately posits that humanity is defined by one's treatment of the creature, symbolizing the Other. Elisa embodies compassion, while Strickland represents a fear of difference, revealing the nuanced spectrum of human response to the unfamiliar.

The Moral Monster's Emergence

By humanizing the Amphibian Man, del Toro simultaneously orchestrates the emergence of Colonel Strickland as the true "moral monster." The creature serves as a metaphorical device to explore power dynamics, agency, and the fluid boundaries between human and non-human. Scenes depicting Strickland's brutal torture of the creature with an electric cattle prod elicit visceral disgust from the audience, highlighting the government official's explicit indifference and the senselessness of his violence. This brutality, juxtaposed with the creature's human-like behavior, compels viewers to question Strickland's own humanity and morality. His recurring acts of violence underscore his monstrosity, solidifying his role as a moral rather than a biological monster. Strickland's privileged position as a cisgender, heterosexual White man within the dominant culture is presented as a factor that shields him from self-reflection, enabling him to inflict violence without immediate societal reproach. This cinematic portrayal of violence and oppression serves as a powerful allegory for the real-world marginalization and aggression faced by various populations.

Critical Reception

Box Office Performance

The Shape of Water achieved a global box office gross of $195.2 million, with $63.9 million from the United States and Canada, and $131.4 million from other international markets. Following a successful three-week limited release that garnered $4.6 million, the film expanded widely on December 22, 2017. It earned $3 million from 726 theaters over its wide opening weekend, accumulating $4.4 million over the four-day Christmas period. A significant boost in earnings occurred the weekend of January 27, 2018, after its 13 Oscar nominations were announced, leading to an additional $5.9 million from over 1,000 added theaters, marking a 171% increase from the previous week. Post-Oscars, the film continued to perform well, adding $2.4 million the weekend of March 9–11, a 64% increase from the prior week, mirroring the post-Best Picture win performance of Moonlight (2016).

Critical Consensus

The film received "universal acclaim" according to Metacritic, which assigned a weighted average score of 87 out of 100 based on 53 critics. Rotten Tomatoes reported an approval rating of 92% based on 465 reviews, with an average score of 8.3/10. The site's critical consensus praised Guillermo del Toro's "visually distinctive best" and an "emotionally absorbing story brought to life by a stellar Sally Hawkins performance." Ben Croll of IndieWire awarded the film an 'A' rating, hailing it as "one of del Toro's most stunningly successful works" and a "powerful vision of a creative master feeling totally, joyously free." Peter Travers of Rolling Stone lauded Hawkins's performance, cinematography, and del Toro's direction, noting that the core relationship "holds us in thrall." Haley Bennett of the Minnesota Daily found the film "elegant and mesmerizing," possessing a "tenderness uncommon to del Toro films."

Divergent Views

Despite widespread praise, some critics offered less favorable assessments. Rex Reed of the New York Observer gave the film one out of four stars, dismissing it as "a loopy, lunkheaded load of drivel." Reed's review drew criticism for mischaracterizing Hawkins's mute character as "mentally handicapped" and for incorrectly attributing the film's direction to Benicio del Toro. The film also appeared on numerous critics' year-end top-ten lists, with 25 critics selecting it as their favorite film of 2017. In a 2025 "Readers' Choice" edition of The New York Times' "The 100 Best Movies of the 21st Century," the film ranked at number 227, indicating its lasting, albeit varied, impact on audiences.

Awards & Honors

Academy Awards Triumph

The Shape of Water led the field at the 90th Academy Awards with 13 nominations, ultimately securing four wins: Best Picture, Best Director for Guillermo del Toro, Best Production Design, and Best Original Score. Its victory for Best Picture marked a significant moment, as it became only the second fantasy film in history to receive this highest honor, following The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003). The film's critical acclaim extended to its acting, screenplay, direction, visuals, production design, and musical score, solidifying its place as a standout cinematic achievement of 2017.

Other Major Recognitions

Beyond the Oscars, The Shape of Water garnered numerous other prestigious awards and nominations:

  • American Film Institute: Selected as one of the top 10 films of 2017.
  • 75th Golden Globe Awards: Earned seven nominations, winning for Best Director and Best Original Score.
  • 71st British Academy Film Awards (BAFTAs): Received twelve nominations, winning three awards, including Best Director.
  • 23rd Critics' Choice Awards: Nominated for fourteen awards, winning four.

Canadian Screen Awards Debate

The film sparked a debate regarding its eligibility for Canadian Screen Awards nominations. Despite being filmed in Canada with a predominantly Canadian crew and numerous Canadian supporting actors, it did not meet the Academy of Canadian Cinema and Television's rules for international co-productions, which require at least 15 percent of a film's funding to originate from a Canadian studio. Even Canadian co-producer J. Miles Dale supported these rules, stating he did not believe the film should have been eligible. This highlights the complexities of international film production and national award criteria.

Plagiarism Accusations

The Zindel Lawsuit

In February 2018, the estate of playwright Paul Zindel filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Guillermo del Toro and associate producer Daniel Kraus. The lawsuit alleged that The Shape of Water "brazenly copies the story, elements, characters, and themes" of Zindel's 1969 play, "Let Me Hear You Whisper." Zindel's work features a cleaning lady who bonds with a dolphin and attempts to rescue it from a secret research laboratory. The complaint detailed "overwhelming similarities" between the two works. Del Toro vehemently denied the claims, stating he had never read or seen the play before making his film, and his collaborators had never mentioned it. Fox Searchlight Pictures, the distributor, also denied the claims and pledged to "vigorously defend" itself. In July 2018, Judge Percy Anderson dismissed the suit, and in April 2021, Zindel's son, David Zindel, released a statement acknowledging that, based on confidential information obtained during litigation, his claims of plagiarism were unfounded and that Guillermo del Toro was the true creator of The Shape of Water, with any similarities being coincidental.

Comparisons to "Amphibian Man"

Accusations of plagiarism also arose concerning the 1962 Soviet film Amphibian Man, which was based on Alexander Belyaev's 1928 novel of the same name. Indie Cinema Magazine highlighted several parallels, including a similar plot involving a romantic relationship between a human and an amphibious man held captive, the use of the term "Amphibian Man," a Soviet connection in both narratives, and the shared 1962 setting. Amphibian Man was a highly successful Soviet film, with over 100 million box office admissions in the Soviet Union.

Jeunet's Allegations and Other Similarities

French director Jean-Pierre Jeunet, known for films like Amélie and Delicatessen, also accused del Toro of plagiarizing scenes from his own works, including Amélie, Delicatessen, and The City of Lost Children. Jeunet pointed to similarities in color saturation, art direction, the use of anthropomorphic objects, and musical style reminiscent of Yann Tiersen's soundtrack for Amélie. Del Toro, in response, cited the influence of Terry Gilliam's works on The Shape of Water. Both del Toro and composer Alexandre Desplat have also referenced French composer Georges Delerue, whose work predates Tiersen's, as an inspiration for the film's score, with Desplat emphasizing the integral role of water in both the music and themes. Furthermore, comparisons were drawn between The Shape of Water and Marc S. Nollkaemper's 2015 short film "The Space Between Us," a student project. Both films shared a premise of a janitorial worker falling in love with an amphibious man in a research facility, along with other similarities such as the time period, scenes of feeding the creature, dancing to records, and rescue missions involving laundry carts. However, the Netherlands Film Academy and its students issued a statement affirming that the films had separate development timelines and were not interlinked or related.

Critique of the Romance

Despite widespread acclaim, a significant critique of The Shape of Water centers on the romantic relationship between Elisa and the Amphibian Man. While del Toro's intention to highlight the "beauty of the Other" is acknowledged, some viewers, particularly disability activists like Dominick Evans, found the messaging problematic. They argued that the film could be interpreted as suggesting that individuals with disabilities are so fundamentally different from mainstream society that they can only find love and respect from a "monster." This sentiment is exacerbated by the film's ending, where Elisa and the creature appear to depart from the human world. Critics suggest this could imply that if people with disabilities do not conform to societal norms, their best option is to leave. Thus, while many celebrate the film as a powerful love story where marginalized individuals discover strength and affection, others are left to ponder their own societal acceptance and humanity.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "The Shape Of Water" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about the_shape_of_water while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

References

References

A full list of references for this article are available at the The Shape of Water Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not professional film criticism or academic advice. The interpretations and analyses presented herein are derived from the provided source material and are intended to stimulate further discussion and research. Always refer to original scholarly articles, official film documentation, and diverse critical perspectives for a comprehensive understanding of cinematic works. Never disregard established academic methodologies or professional critical analysis based on information presented on this website.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.