What is United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718?

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 is a resolution adopted unanimously by the UN Security Council on October 14, 2006. It was enacted under Chapter VII, Article 41 of the UN Charter and imposed a series of economic and commercial sanctions on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK), commonly known as North Korea. The resolution was a direct response to North Korea's claimed nuclear test conducted on October 9, 2006.

When was UN Security Council Resolution 1718 adopted, and by what vote count?

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 was adopted on October 14, 2006. The vote was unanimous, with 15 members voting in favor, none voting against, and none abstaining.

What is the legal basis for United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718?

The legal basis for United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 is Chapter VII, Article 41 of the United Nations Charter. This chapter grants the Security Council the authority to take measures, not involving the use of armed force, to maintain or restore international peace and security.

What was the primary subject of UN Security Council Resolution 1718?

The primary subject of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 was the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons concerning the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK). It specifically addressed the DPRK's nuclear program following its claimed nuclear test.

What event directly led to the adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 1718?

The adoption of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 was directly triggered by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's (DPRK) claimed nuclear test, which occurred on October 9, 2006.

What was the overall objective of the sanctions imposed by UN Security Council Resolution 1718?

The overall objective of the sanctions imposed by UN Security Council Resolution 1718 was to persuade North Korea to comply with previous Security Council resolutions and the requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The sanctions aimed to constrain North Korea's development of nuclear weapons and related technologies, thereby contributing to international peace and security.

What specific types of arms were prohibited from being supplied to North Korea under Resolution 1718?

Resolution 1718 prohibited the supply, sale, or transfer to North Korea of eight broad categories of conventional weapons. These included battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, missiles, and missile systems, as defined for the purpose of the United Nations Register of Conventional Arms. The resolution also prohibited the supply of spare parts and related materiel for these weapons.

Beyond heavy weapons, what other trade restrictions did Resolution 1718 impose on North Korea?

Resolution 1718 prohibited North Korea from acquiring interests in commercial activities abroad related to uranium enrichment, nuclear materials, or nuclear technology. It also banned the import of luxury goods into North Korea and prohibited North Korea from undertaking any activity related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons. Furthermore, it updated lists of technical items related to nuclear and missile proliferation that were prohibited from being transferred to or from the DPRK.

What measures did Resolution 1718 introduce regarding cargo inspections?

Resolution 1718 established a new suspicious cargo inspection regime. It mandated that all states inspect any cargo to and from North Korea within their territory, including at seaports and airports, if they had reasonable grounds to believe it contained items prohibited by the resolution. States were also called upon to cooperate in inspecting vessels on the high seas under similar conditions, with the consent of the flag state.

What action must states take if prohibited items are discovered during cargo inspections under Resolution 1718?

If prohibited items are discovered during cargo inspections conducted under Resolution 1718, states are obligated to seize and dispose of those items. This disposal could include destruction, rendering the items inoperable, storage, or transferring them to a state other than the originating or destination states for disposal, provided these actions are consistent with international law and other Security Council obligations.

How did Resolution 1718 address financial transactions and banking relationships with North Korea?

Resolution 1718 urged states to prohibit financial services, including insurance and reinsurance, and to freeze any assets that could contribute to North Korea's proliferation-sensitive nuclear activities or the development of nuclear weapon delivery systems. It also called for prohibiting new banking relationships with North Korea, such as opening new branches, subsidiaries, or correspondent relationships, if there was a suspected proliferation link. Financial institutions were also prevented from opening branches in North Korea under similar circumstances.

What specific entities were targeted by sanctions under Resolution 1718?

Resolution 1718 specifically targeted entities involved in North Korea's nuclear or ballistic missile activities. Annex I listed individuals and entities involved in these activities, while Annex II listed entities owned, controlled, or acting on behalf of the Korea Mining Development Trading Corporation (KOMID). Annex III listed entities related to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea Shipping Lines (NKISL). The resolution also mandated asset freezes for fifteen KOMID-linked companies and forty North Korean companies.

Were individuals targeted by Resolution 1718, and if so, what measures applied to them?

Yes, individuals were targeted by Resolution 1718. Annex I listed individuals involved in nuclear or ballistic missile activities. Eighty-one individuals were subject to an asset freeze, and one individual, identified as the head of a critical nuclear research program, was also subject to a travel ban. Additionally, 35 individuals previously subject to 'travel vigilance' were now subject to a travel ban.

What is the role of the UN Security Council Sanctions Committee established by Resolution 1718?

Resolution 1718 established a Sanctions Committee tasked with gathering information, specifying the sanctions, monitoring their implementation, and issuing recommendations. This committee plays a crucial role in overseeing compliance with the resolution's provisions.

What is the 'Group of Experts' mentioned in relation to Resolution 1718?

The 'Group of Experts,' also referred to as the Panel of Experts, was established under Resolution 1718 to monitor countries' implementation of the sanctions. This panel, comprising up to eight experts, assists the Sanctions Committee, gathers and analyzes information on implementation and non-compliance, and makes recommendations to the Security Council on improving sanctions enforcement.

Under what conditions could the sanctions imposed by Resolution 1718 be suspended or terminated?

The resolution stipulated that the Security Council would suspend the implementation of measures if, and for as long as, North Korea suspended all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities, including research and development, as verified by the IAEA, to allow for good-faith negotiations. The measures would be terminated once the Security Council determined that North Korea had fully complied with its obligations under relevant resolutions and met the requirements of the IAEA Board of Governors, as confirmed by the IAEA Board.

What was the stance of China and Russia regarding the cargo inspection provisions of Resolution 1718?

China and Russia expressed concerns about the potential for cargo inspections mandated by Resolution 1718 to provoke confrontations with the North Korean Navy. Following the resolution's passage, China explicitly stated that it would not perform such inspections, indicating a difference in approach to enforcement among Security Council members.

How did the United States compromise on its initial demands regarding arms imports under Resolution 1718?

The United States initially desired a complete ban on all imports of military equipment into North Korea. However, to achieve unanimous adoption of Resolution 1718, the US compromised on this point, leading to a more specific list of prohibited heavy weapons rather than a blanket ban on all military equipment imports.

What action did French officials take in November 2006 related to Resolution 1718?

On November 16, 2006, French officials in Mayotte, a French territory in the Indian Ocean, searched a North Korean ship. This action was taken in accordance with the terms of Resolution 1718, which allowed for the inspection of cargo suspected of carrying prohibited items.

How did North Korea react to the adoption of Resolution 1718?

North Korea's UN envoy, Pak Gil Yon, walked out of the Security Council chamber after declaring that Pyongyang 'totally rejects' the resolution, calling it 'unjustifiable' and 'gangster-like.' He argued that the Council was neglecting pressure from the United States and warned that increased pressure would be considered a 'declaration of war,' leading North Korea to take 'physical countermeasures.'

What analogy did the US Ambassador John Bolton use to describe North Korea's reaction to Resolution 1718?

The US Ambassador to the UN at the time, John Bolton, described North Korea's rejection of the resolution and walkout as 'the contemporary equivalent of Nikita Khrushchev pounding his shoe on the rostrum of the General Assembly.' This was the second time in three months that the North Korean representative had rejected a unanimous Security Council resolution and left the chamber.

What did North Korea state regarding the sanctions imposed by Resolution 1718 in October 2006?

On October 17, 2006, North Korea stated that the United Nations had effectively declared war on the country by imposing sanctions following its nuclear test. The DPRK foreign ministry issued a statement, carried by the Korean Central News Agency, asserting that while North Korea desired peace, it was not afraid of war and would 'mercilessly strike' if its sovereignty was violated.

How did the resolution address North Korea's right to peaceful nuclear energy?

Resolution 1718, while imposing sanctions, acknowledged the right of states party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) to develop research, production, and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination. Annex IV, outlining a proposal for cooperation, reaffirmed North Korea's right to nuclear energy for exclusively peaceful purposes in conformity with its NPT obligations and stated that its nuclear program would be treated like that of any Non-Nuclear Weapon State once international confidence was restored.

What specific types of luxury goods were banned from import into North Korea by Resolution 1718?

The text of Resolution 1718 explicitly states that UN members are banned from exporting luxury goods to North Korea. However, the specific types of luxury goods are not detailed within the provided text of the resolution itself.

What was the significance of the vote on Resolution 1718?

The vote on Resolution 1718 was significant because it was unanimous (15-0-0), demonstrating a united front by the UN Security Council in condemning North Korea's nuclear test and imposing sanctions. This unity was intended to send a strong message to Pyongyang and other potential proliferators about the international community's resolve.

What role did the IAEA play in relation to Resolution 1718?

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) played a crucial role. Resolution 1718 required North Korea to take steps outlined by the IAEA Board of Governors, cooperate fully with the IAEA on all outstanding issues, and allow IAEA inspectors access to sites and documents. The IAEA was also tasked with verifying North Korea's suspension of enrichment-related and reprocessing activities, a condition for the suspension of sanctions.

What were the 'proliferation-sensitive activities' mentioned in Resolution 1718?

The 'proliferation-sensitive activities' referred to in Resolution 1718 encompass actions and programs related to the development of weapons of mass destruction, particularly nuclear weapons and their delivery systems. This includes activities such as uranium enrichment, nuclear fuel reprocessing, and the development or testing of ballistic missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads.

Did Resolution 1718 allow for any exemptions to the imposed sanctions?

Yes, Resolution 1718 included provisions for exemptions. Specifically, travel ban exemptions could be reviewed on a case-by-case basis by the Sanctions Committee if justified on humanitarian grounds, including religious obligations, or if the exemption would further the resolution's objectives. Similarly, the provision of vital support services to ships suspected of carrying prohibited goods was not intended to affect legal economic activities and could be allowed for humanitarian purposes or until cargo was inspected and seized.

What is the significance of Annex IV of Resolution 1718?

Annex IV of Resolution 1718 outlines a proposal detailing possible areas of cooperation with North Korea, presented by China, Japan, Russia, South Korea, and the United States. It specifies conditions under which negotiations could occur, such as North Korea verifiably suspending its enrichment and reprocessing activities. The annex covers potential cooperation in nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, political relations, economic normalization, energy partnerships, agriculture, environment, infrastructure, civil aviation, and humanitarian issues.

How did the resolution address the issue of North Korean banks and financial institutions?

Resolution 1718 urged states to prohibit new banking relationships with North Korea, including the opening of new branches, subsidiaries, or representative offices of North Korean banks, and to prevent North Korean banks from establishing new joint ventures or correspondent relationships if there was a suspected proliferation link. Conversely, it also called for preventing their own financial institutions from opening branches in North Korea if such a link was suspected. Enhanced monitoring was also required for financial transactions that could contribute to proliferation.

What was the stated purpose of the 'Panel of Experts' established under Resolution 1718?

The Panel of Experts, established under Resolution 1718, was tasked with assisting the Sanctions Committee in carrying out its mandate. Its duties included gathering and analyzing information on the implementation of sanctions and identifying non-compliance, making recommendations for improving sanctions implementation, and providing reports to the Security Council on its findings.

What specific types of technology and training related to weapons of mass destruction were prohibited from being provided to North Korea?

Resolution 1718 prohibited the provision of technical training, financial resources, services, advice, or other assistance related to the supply, sale, transfer, provision, manufacture, maintenance, or use of prohibited arms and related materiel. This also extended to technology or technical assistance related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons.

How did Resolution 1718 aim to prevent North Korea from acquiring sensitive nuclear materials or technology abroad?

Resolution 1718 decided that North Korea shall not acquire an interest in any commercial activity in another state involving uranium mining, production, or use of nuclear materials and technology, particularly uranium enrichment and nuclear weapons tests. It also prohibited the transfer of technology or technical assistance related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons. All states were required to prevent such investments and transfers originating from or passing through their territories.

What was the significance of the 'dual-track approach' mentioned by Greece in relation to Resolution 1718?

The 'dual-track approach,' as mentioned by Greece, refers to pursuing both sanctions and diplomatic engagement simultaneously. While Greece supported the necessity of the resolution's sanctions, it also highlighted the importance of continuing diplomatic dialogue and consultations, indicating a belief that a comprehensive solution requires both pressure and negotiation.

What did the resolution state regarding North Korea's potential to develop nuclear weapons for peaceful purposes?

Resolution 1718 acknowledged the right of states, in conformity with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), to develop research, production, and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination. However, it also stressed that North Korea's nuclear program must be exclusively for peaceful purposes, and outstanding issues needed to be resolved to exclude the possibility of military dimensions. Annex IV further elaborated on this by reaffirming North Korea's right to nuclear energy for exclusively peaceful purposes and stating that its program would be treated like that of any Non-Nuclear Weapon State once international confidence was restored.

What specific mention was made of North Korea's missile tests in relation to Resolution 1718 in March 2021?

In March 2021, North Korea fired two ballistic missiles into the Sea of Japan. U.S. President Joe Biden stated that these missile tests violated United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718, indicating that such actions continued to be seen as breaches of the resolution's prohibitions.

What was the purpose of the 'Sanctions list' mentioned in the resolution's text?

The 'Sanctions list' refers to the annexes within Resolution 1718 that detail specific individuals and entities involved in North Korea's nuclear or ballistic missile programs, or those associated with entities like KOMID and NKISL. These lists identify targets for asset freezes, travel bans, and other restrictive measures imposed by the resolution.

How did Resolution 1718 aim to prevent North Korea from evading sanctions?

Resolution 1718 included several measures to prevent evasion. It required states to report information on transfers or activities by North Korean companies, including renaming or re-registering aircraft and vessels, to the Sanctions Committee. It also mandated vigilance when doing business with North Korean companies and prohibited new banking relationships if a proliferation link was suspected. Furthermore, it established a mechanism for seizing and disposing of prohibited items found during inspections.

What specific types of conventional weapons were prohibited from being exported *from* North Korea under Resolution 1718?

Resolution 1718 prohibited the sale or transfer of eight broad categories of heavy weapons from North Korea. These included battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, missiles, and missile systems, as well as related materiel and spare parts. This prohibition aimed to prevent North Korea from profiting from or supplying arms that could destabilize the region.

What was the significance of the Security Council's unanimous vote on Resolution 1718?

The unanimous vote on Resolution 1718 was significant because it demonstrated a strong, unified stance by the international community, led by the Security Council, against North Korea's nuclear test. This unified message aimed to convey the seriousness of the international community's concerns and its determination to address the threat posed by North Korea's nuclear proliferation.

Did Resolution 1718 explicitly authorize the use of military force?

No, Resolution 1718 did not explicitly authorize the use of military force. While it was adopted under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, which can encompass enforcement actions including military force, this specific resolution invoked Article 41, which pertains to measures not involving armed force, such as sanctions, arms embargoes, and financial restrictions.

What was the stated purpose of prohibiting North Korea from investing in certain activities abroad?

The prohibition on North Korea investing in sensitive nuclear activities abroad, such as uranium enrichment and reprocessing, or in activities related to ballistic missiles, was intended to prevent the country from expanding its capabilities in these proliferation-sensitive areas. It aimed to curb its access to technology, materials, and expertise that could advance its weapons programs.

How did Resolution 1718 address the issue of North Korea's nuclear facilities?

Resolution 1718 demanded that North Korea take steps required by the IAEA Board of Governors, including suspending all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities, and resuming cooperation with the IAEA. It also decided that North Korea shall not begin construction on any new uranium-enrichment, reprocessing, or heavy water-related facility and must discontinue any ongoing construction of such facilities.

What was the implication of the resolution for North Korea's participation in international trade and finance?

Resolution 1718 significantly restricted North Korea's participation in international trade and finance. It imposed bans on various imports and exports, prohibited investments in sensitive sectors, restricted financial services, froze assets, and imposed travel bans on targeted individuals and entities. These measures were designed to isolate North Korea economically and financially, thereby pressuring its government to change its behavior regarding its nuclear program.

What specific mention was made of the 'Pyongyang Declaration' in the context of Resolution 1718?

The text of Resolution 1718 noted the efforts towards an agreement with North Korea on the Ryongbyon Research Reactor, which could serve as a confidence-building measure. It also mentioned that the Joint Statement of the six-party talks of September 2005 and other agreements were contravened by North Korea's actions, including the nuclear test. Annex IV also referenced the June 2006 proposal as a basis for negotiations.

What was the significance of the resolution's call for states to report on their implementation steps?

The call for all states to report to the relevant Sanctions Committee within 60 days on the steps taken to implement the necessary measures was crucial for monitoring compliance. This reporting requirement ensured transparency and accountability, allowing the Committee and the Security Council to assess the effectiveness of the sanctions and identify any states that might not be fully adhering to the resolution's provisions.

How did the resolution attempt to prevent the transfer of nuclear and missile technology to North Korea?

Resolution 1718 prohibited the direct or indirect supply, sale, or transfer to North Korea of items related to nuclear and ballistic missile programs. It also specifically decided that states must take all necessary measures to prevent the transfer of technology or technical assistance to North Korea related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons. Furthermore, it updated the lists of technical items prohibited from transfer to or from the DPRK.

What was the stance of the DPRK representative regarding the US nuclear threat mentioned during the Security Council debate?

During the Security Council debate, the DPRK representative argued that the Council was applying double standards by adopting Resolution 1718 while neglecting the 'nuclear threat posed by the United States' against North Korea. He stated that North Korea's nuclear test was a direct result of US threats, sanctions, and pressure, and that if the US persisted in increasing pressure, North Korea would 'continue to take physical countermeasures considering it as a declaration of war.'

What specific provision was made for humanitarian relief efforts under Resolution 1718?

Resolution 1718 included provisions that allowed for exemptions to travel bans and financial restrictions for humanitarian purposes. These exemptions could be reviewed on a case-by-case basis by the Sanctions Committee, ensuring that the sanctions primarily targeted the regime's weapons programs and not the humanitarian needs of the North Korean people.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 Wiki: UNSCR 1718: Global Sanctions Framework

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Resolution Overview

Mandate and Context

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 was adopted unanimously on October 14, 2006, in response to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's (DPRK) claimed nuclear test conducted on October 9, 2006. Operating under Chapter VII, Article 41 of the UN Charter, the resolution imposed a comprehensive set of economic and commercial sanctions against the DPRK.

Global Consensus

The resolution passed with a 15-0 vote, signifying a unified stance by the Security Council members condemning the DPRK's actions. It aimed to curb the proliferation of nuclear weapons and related materials by restricting the DPRK's access to critical components and financial resources.

Core Objectives

The primary objectives were to halt the DPRK's nuclear weapons program, prevent the transfer of sensitive materials and technology, and encourage the DPRK's return to diplomatic negotiations, specifically the Six-Party Talks, while ensuring compliance with IAEA safeguards.

Key Provisions

Prohibited Imports/Exports

The resolution banned the import of luxury goods into the DPRK and prohibited the supply, sale, or transfer of specific conventional arms, including battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber artillery, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, missiles, and missile systems, along with related spare parts and technical assistance.

Nuclear & Missile Restrictions

It prohibited the DPRK from investing in sensitive nuclear activities abroad (uranium enrichment, reprocessing) and from undertaking any activity related to ballistic missiles capable of delivering nuclear weapons. States were mandated to prevent the transfer of related technology or technical assistance to the DPRK.

Cargo Inspections

A significant measure involved authorizing states to inspect, on their territory (including seaports and airports), any cargo suspected of containing prohibited items. This extended to vessels on the high seas, requiring flag state consent, with the goal of preventing illicit trafficking of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons materials.

Financial Measures

The resolution mandated asset freezes for individuals and entities involved in the DPRK's nuclear or ballistic missile programs. It also called for vigilance over transactions involving DPRK banks and prohibited new banking relationships if suspected proliferation links existed, including correspondent banking and joint ventures.

Sanctions Scope

Targeted Entities

The resolution designated specific individuals and entities involved in the DPRK's nuclear and missile programs for asset freezes and travel bans. These included organizations like the Korea Mining Development Trading Corporation (KOMID) and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea Shipping Lines (NKISL), along with numerous associated companies and individuals listed in the annexes.

Maritime and Financial Controls

Specific measures targeted maritime activities by prohibiting bunkering services for suspect DPRK vessels and requiring vigilance regarding companies like NKISL. Financial controls extended to preventing the provision of insurance or reinsurance for prohibited transactions and urging vigilance when dealing with DPRK companies.

Due Diligence

Member states were urged to ensure their nationals exercised due diligence when conducting business with DPRK entities, particularly those linked to KOMID and NKISL, to prevent contributions to proliferation-sensitive activities or violations of previous resolutions.

Enforcement Mechanisms

Sanctions Committee

Resolution 1718 established a Security Council Sanctions Committee tasked with gathering information, specifying sanctions, monitoring implementation, and issuing recommendations. This committee plays a crucial role in overseeing compliance with the imposed measures.

Panel of Experts

In 2009, a Panel of Experts, comprising eight members, was established to support the Sanctions Committee. The panel's mandate includes assisting the committee, gathering and analyzing information on implementation and non-compliance, and making recommendations for improving the effectiveness of the sanctions regime.

Implementation Challenges

While the resolution invoked Chapter VII, allowing for enforcement, its practical application faced challenges. Notably, China expressed concerns about cargo inspections potentially provoking confrontations and declared it would not conduct such inspections. Differences in interpretation and willingness to enforce certain measures highlighted the complexities of international consensus.

International Reactions

DPRK's Rejection

North Korea's UN envoy, Pak Gil Yon, vehemently rejected the resolution, labeling it "gangster-like" and unjustifiable. He criticized the Security Council for neglecting perceived US pressure and threatened "physical countermeasures," viewing increased pressure as a "declaration of war."

US Ambassador's Remarks

US Ambassador John Bolton criticized the DPRK envoy's walkout, comparing it to Nikita Khrushchev's shoe-banging incident at the UN General Assembly, highlighting the DPRK's repeated rejection of Security Council resolutions.

DPRK's Declaration of War

Following the resolution's adoption, North Korea's Foreign Ministry stated that the UN sanctions effectively constituted a declaration of war, asserting the country's readiness for peace but also for conflict if its sovereignty were violated.

Historical Context

Preceding Events

Resolution 1718 followed North Korea's announcement of its first nuclear test on October 9, 2006. This action defied previous international calls, including UN Security Council Resolution 1695 adopted in July 2006, which had already condemned missile launches and urged adherence to non-proliferation commitments.

Diplomatic Efforts

The resolution acknowledged ongoing diplomatic efforts, including the Six-Party Talks and proposals by China, Japan, Russia, South Korea, and the United States. It emphasized the willingness to continue dialogue and consultations towards a peaceful, negotiated solution, contingent on DPRK's compliance.

Subsequent Developments

The resolution laid the groundwork for future UN Security Council actions concerning North Korea's nuclear and missile programs, including subsequent resolutions imposing further sanctions and strengthening existing measures in response to continued violations.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about united_nations_security_council_resolution_1718 while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

koz łówka palace

demosthenes

cervical vertebrae

sir john cutler 1st baronet

cuthbert

school certificate united kingdom

nikolai dukhonin

integer

royal institution christmas lectures

list of german states by grdp

References

"France searches N Korean vessel". BBC News. November 16, 2006

"UN slaps sanctions on North Korea". BBC News. October 14, 2006

"N Korea says sanctions 'are war'", BBC News, October 17, 2006

A full list of references for this article are available at the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on publicly available data and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not legal or political advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional legal consultation, geopolitical analysis, or official UN documentation. Always refer to official sources and consult with qualified professionals for specific legal or policy matters.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.

UNSCR 1718: Global Sanctions Framework

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

Resolution Overview ℹ️

⚖️ Mandate and Context

🌍 Global Consensus

🎯 Core Objectives

Key Provisions 📜

🚫 Prohibited Imports/Exports

🔗 Nuclear & Missile Restrictions

🔍 Cargo Inspections

💰 Financial Measures

Sanctions Scope ⚖️

🎯 Targeted Entities

🚢 Maritime and Financial Controls

💼 Due Diligence

Enforcement Mechanisms ⚙️

🏛️ Sanctions Committee

🧑‍⚖️ Panel of Experts

⚠️ Implementation Challenges

International Reactions 🗣️

❌ DPRK's Rejection

🇺🇸 US Ambassador's Remarks

🚨 DPRK's Declaration of War

Historical Context ⏳

🗓️ Preceding Events

🤝 Diplomatic Efforts

➡️ Subsequent Developments

Related Topics 🔗

📚 Key Areas

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

Resolution Overview

Mandate and Context

Global Consensus

Core Objectives

Key Provisions

Prohibited Imports/Exports

Nuclear & Missile Restrictions

Cargo Inspections

Financial Measures

Sanctions Scope

Targeted Entities

Maritime and Financial Controls

Due Diligence

Enforcement Mechanisms

Sanctions Committee

Panel of Experts

Implementation Challenges

International Reactions

DPRK's Rejection

US Ambassador's Remarks

DPRK's Declaration of War

Historical Context

Preceding Events

Diplomatic Efforts

Subsequent Developments

Related Topics

Key Areas

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Disclaimer

Important Notice