This is an analytical overview based on the Wikipedia article on the WEF Global Competitiveness Report. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

Global Economic Vitality

Decoding the Competitiveness Index: An analytical deep dive into the factors shaping national economic performance and global standing.

What is Competitiveness? 👇 Explore Rankings 🏆

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Report Overview

The WEF Report

The Global Competitiveness Report (GCR) was an annual publication by the World Economic Forum (WEF) (opens in new tab). Between 2004 and 2020, it ranked nations using the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI), a comprehensive framework assessing the drivers of national productivity and long-term economic growth.

Purpose of the Index

The GCI aimed to measure the "ability of countries to provide high levels of prosperity to their citizens." This capability is intrinsically linked to how productively a nation utilizes its available resources. The index integrated macroeconomic stability, microeconomic foundations, and the institutional and policy environments that foster sustainable economic performance.

Discontinuation

The report and its associated index were discontinued in 2020. The WEF has since shifted its focus to other initiatives and reports, though the methodologies and findings of the GCR continue to inform discussions on global economic competitiveness.

Methodology & Metrics

Index Composition

The GCI was built upon over 110 variables, drawing data from two primary sources: the Executive Opinion Survey (EOS), representing the perspectives of business leaders, and publicly available data from international organizations like the United Nations.

The EOS surveyed thousands of business executives across 140+ countries. Respondent numbers grew annually, providing a crucial qualitative layer to the quantitative data, reflecting real-world business perceptions of the economic landscape.

Index Development

The GCI framework was developed by economists Xavier Sala-i-Martin and Elsa V. Artadi, integrating macroeconomic factors (previously measured by Sachs' Growth Development Index) and micro/business competitiveness factors (based on Porter's Business Competitiveness Index). This holistic approach aimed to provide a single, unified measure of national competitiveness.

The 12 Pillars of Competitiveness

Core Pillars

The GCI framework is structured around twelve key pillars, each representing a critical determinant of a nation's economic competitiveness:

  1. Institutions
  2. Infrastructure
  3. Macroeconomic Framework
  4. Health and Primary Education
  5. Higher Education and Training
  6. Goods Markets
  7. Labor Markets
  8. Financial Markets
  9. Technology Adoption
  10. Market Size
  11. Business Sophistication
  12. Innovation

Stages of Development

Factor-Driven Economies

In this initial stage, countries rely on basic endowments like unskilled labor and natural resources. Competitiveness hinges on foundational elements: strong institutions, adequate infrastructure, macroeconomic stability, and basic health and education.

Efficiency-Driven Economies

As economies develop, they must improve efficiency in production and product quality. Competitiveness shifts towards higher education, efficient goods and labor markets, developed financial systems, technology adoption, and market size.

Innovation-Driven Economies

At the highest stage, sustained prosperity depends on producing unique, differentiated goods and services through sophisticated processes and innovation. Pillars related to business sophistication and innovation become paramount, carrying greater weight in the overall score.

Pillar weights are adjusted based on a country's per capita income, reflecting the varying importance of these factors across different development levels.

2019 Global Competitiveness Rankings

Top Performers

The 2019 report highlighted significant variations in global competitiveness. Singapore led the rankings, followed closely by the United States and Hong Kong. The index reflects a complex interplay of institutional quality, technological readiness, and human capital development.

Rank Country Score
Increase 1 Singapore 84.8
Decrease 2 United States 83.7
Increase 3 Hong Kong 83.1
Increase 4 Netherlands 82.4
Decrease 5 Switzerland 82.3
Decrease 6 Japan 82.3
Decrease 7 Germany 81.8
Increase 8 Sweden 81.2
Decrease 9 United Kingdom 81.2
Steady 10 Denmark 81.2
Steady 11 Finland 80.2
Increase 12 Taiwan 80.2
Increase 13 South Korea 79.6
Decrease 14 Canada 79.6
Increase 15 France 78.8
Decrease 16 Australia 78.7
Decrease 17 Norway 78.1
Increase 18 Luxembourg 77.0
Decrease 19 New Zealand 76.7
Steady 20 Israel 76.7
Increase 21 Austria 76.6
Decrease 22 Belgium 76.4
Increase 23 Spain 75.3
Decrease 24 Ireland 75.1
Increase 25 United Arab Emirates 75.0
Decrease 26 Iceland 74.7
Decrease 27 Malaysia 74.6
Steady 28 China 73.9
Increase 29 Qatar 72.9
Increase 30 Italy 71.5
Increase 31 Estonia 70.9
Decrease 32 Czech Republic 70.9
Steady 33 Chile 70.5
Steady 34 Portugal 70.4
Steady 35 Slovenia 70.2
Increase 36 Saudi Arabia 70.0
Steady 37 Poland 68.9
Decrease 38 Malta 68.5
Increase 39 Lithuania 68.4
Decrease 40 Thailand 68.1
Increase 41 Latvia 67.0
Decrease 42 Slovakia 66.8
Steady 43 Russia 66.7
Steady 44 Cyprus 66.4
Increase 45 Bahrain 65.4
Increase 46 Kuwait 65.1
Increase 47 Hungary 65.1
Decrease 48 Mexico 64.9
Increase 49 Bulgaria 64.9
Decrease 50 Indonesia 64.6

Report Limitations

Environmental Oversight

Despite the WEF's own Global Risks Report increasingly identifying environmental pressures as dominant global risks, the GCI methodology historically excluded environmental dimensions from its core competitiveness ranking. While the 2018 and 2019 reports used the ecological footprint as a contextual indicator, it was not integrated into the scoring algorithm, potentially limiting a holistic view of sustainable development.

Allegations of Manipulation

Political Influence Claims

In 2025, reports emerged alleging that WEF leader Klaus Schwab intervened in the GCR process for political motives. These reports suggested that unfavorable rankings for certain countries, particularly in the Middle East, North Africa, and India, were altered or suppressed. Such allegations, if substantiated, would raise significant questions about the objectivity and reliability of the index's historical data.

This information highlights the importance of critically evaluating data sources and potential biases.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Wef Global Competitiveness Report" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about wef_global_competitiveness_report while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

References

References

  1.  "Sala-i-Martin, Xavier and Elsa V. Artadi, "The Global Competitiveness Index", Global Competitiveness Report, Global Economic Forum 2004
A full list of references for this article are available at the WEF Global Competitiveness Report Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is derived from a snapshot of publicly available data and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date, especially concerning the report's discontinuation and alleged manipulation.

This is not financial or economic advice. The information provided is not a substitute for professional economic analysis, consultation, or due diligence. Always consult with qualified economic advisors and refer to official sources for critical decision-making.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.