Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 5
Is a dialect exclusively defined as a non-standard variety of a language spoken by a specific group?
Answer: False
The definition of a dialect encompasses both standardized and non-standardized varieties spoken by a particular group, not exclusively non-standard forms.
Are 'accent' and 'dialect' synonymous terms in linguistics, both referring only to pronunciation differences?
Answer: False
While accent refers primarily to pronunciation, dialect encompasses variations in pronunciation, grammar, and vocabulary. Many linguists consider accent a component of dialect.
Do linguists universally prefer the term 'dialect' over 'variety' because it is more precise?
Answer: False
Linguists often prefer the term 'variety' because it is more neutral and avoids the sociopolitical connotations often associated with 'dialect'.
According to linguistic principles, what constitutes the fundamental definition of a dialect?
Answer: A variety of a language spoken by a particular group, including standardized and vernacular forms.
In linguistics, a dialect is defined as a variety of a language spoken by a particular group of people. This encompasses both dominant, standardized varieties and vernacular, unwritten, or non-standardized forms used by specific communities.
Which term is used as an alternative for geographical or regional dialects?
Answer: Regiolect
The term 'regiolect' is used as an alternative for geographical or regional dialects, specifically denoting speech patterns tied to a particular area.
What is the primary difference between a dialect and an accent?
Answer: Dialects involve grammar and vocabulary, while accents only involve pronunciation.
The primary distinction is that accents refer solely to pronunciation differences, whereas dialects encompass variations in pronunciation, grammar, and vocabulary.
The term 'variety' is often preferred by linguists over 'dialect' because:
Answer: 'Variety' is a more neutral term, avoiding sociopolitical connotations.
Linguists often prefer the term 'variety' as it serves as a more neutral descriptor for distinct forms of language, thereby avoiding the potentially negative sociopolitical connotations associated with the term 'dialect'.
Do standardized languages inherently lack institutional support, unlike non-standard dialects?
Answer: False
Standardized languages are characterized by significant institutional support, including recognition in education, literature, and formal contexts, which is typically absent in non-standard dialects.
Is a sociolect defined by the geographical region in which a language variety is spoken?
Answer: False
A sociolect is defined by social factors, such as social class or ethnicity, rather than geographical region, which characterizes a regiolect.
What key characteristic distinguishes a 'standard dialect' or 'standardized language'?
Answer: Its widespread use in literature and formal education, supported by institutions.
A standard dialect, or standardized language, is characterized by institutional support, including its prevalence in literature, formal education, and official contexts.
Which of the following is an example of a standardized language supported by an institution, as mentioned in the source?
Answer: French, supported by the Académie Française
The French language is cited as an example of a standardized language that receives institutional support from bodies such as the Académie Française.
How does a nonstandard dialect differ from a standard dialect, according to the source?
Answer: A nonstandard dialect possesses a complete grammar and vocabulary but lacks institutional support.
A nonstandard dialect, while possessing a full grammar and vocabulary, is distinguished from a standard dialect by its lack of institutional support and formal recognition.
The distinction between 'standard' and 'nonstandard' dialects is often considered arbitrary because it is frequently influenced by:
Answer: Social, political, cultural, or historical factors.
The classification of dialects as 'standard' or 'nonstandard' is frequently arbitrary, being heavily influenced by social, political, cultural, and historical contexts rather than purely linguistic attributes.
What is a 'sociolect'?
Answer: A dialect associated with a particular social class.
A sociolect refers to a dialect that is associated with a specific social class or group within a society.
Is the distinction between a standard dialect and a vernacular dialect always based on objective linguistic differences?
Answer: False
The distinction between standard and vernacular dialects is often influenced by social, political, and historical factors rather than solely objective linguistic differences.
Is there a single, universally accepted linguistic criterion to definitively distinguish between two dialects and two separate languages?
Answer: False
There is no single, universally accepted linguistic criterion for distinguishing between dialects and languages, making the classification often subjective.
Does mutual intelligibility imply that speakers of one language variety can understand speakers of another variety, and vice versa?
Answer: True
Mutual intelligibility is a key criterion suggesting that two varieties might be dialects of the same language, as it indicates reciprocal understanding between their speakers.
Is a dialect continuum characterized by distinct, mutually unintelligible language varieties separated by clear boundaries?
Answer: False
A dialect continuum is characterized by gradual transitions between mutually intelligible varieties, lacking sharp boundaries.
Does SIL International designate a group of varieties as a 'language' only if all peripheral varieties are strictly mutually intelligible with the central variety?
Answer: False
SIL International uses a threshold of intelligibility between a central variety and others, focusing on coverage rather than requiring strict mutual intelligibility among all peripheral varieties.
Does the sociolinguistic concept of 'linguistic authority' suggest that varieties are dialects if their speakers refer to the same external standard (like a dictionary) for correctness?
Answer: True
The concept of linguistic authority posits that varieties are considered dialects of the same language if their speakers defer to a common external standard for linguistic correctness.
Are Heinz Kloss's 'abstand' languages those that have developed separate standards and institutions, regardless of mutual intelligibility?
Answer: False
'Abstand' languages refer to those with significant linguistic distance, while 'ausbau' languages are those that have developed separate standards and institutions.
Are 'ausbau' languages characterized by significant linguistic distance ('abstand') from related languages?
Answer: False
'Ausbau' languages are defined by their developed separate standards and institutions, whereas 'abstand' languages are characterized by significant linguistic distance.
What is the main difficulty in linguistically distinguishing between two dialects and two separate languages?
Answer: The absence of a single, universally accepted criterion for distinction.
The primary challenge in distinguishing between dialects and languages lies in the absence of a single, universally accepted criterion, leading to subjective classifications.
The criterion of 'mutual intelligibility' suggests two varieties are dialects if:
Answer: Speakers of one can understand and be understood by speakers of the other.
The criterion of mutual intelligibility suggests that two varieties are dialects if speakers of one can comprehend and be comprehended by speakers of the other.
What linguistic phenomenon challenges the mutual intelligibility criterion by showing gradual transitions between varieties?
Answer: Dialect continuum
A dialect continuum, characterized by gradual transitions between mutually intelligible varieties, challenges the mutual intelligibility criterion by making it difficult to draw a definitive line between dialects and languages.
How does SIL International use intelligibility to define a 'language' within a 'dialect cluster'?
Answer: By setting a high threshold of intelligibility between the central variety and others, focusing on coverage.
SIL International defines a 'language' within a 'dialect cluster' by establishing a high threshold of intelligibility between a central variety and other varieties, emphasizing coverage rather than absolute mutual intelligibility across all members.
The concept of 'linguistic authority' suggests two varieties are dialects of the same language if their speakers:
Answer: Defer to the same external authority (like a dictionary) for language questions.
The concept of linguistic authority posits that varieties are considered dialects if their speakers refer to the same external standard, such as a dictionary or grammar, for linguistic correctness.
Heinz Kloss used the term 'ausbau' languages to describe languages that:
Answer: Have developed separate standards and institutions.
Heinz Kloss's term 'ausbau' languages refers to varieties that have developed distinct standards and institutions, differentiating them from related languages.
What does the term 'dialect continuum' describe?
Answer: A sequence of varieties where adjacent ones are mutually intelligible, but distant ones may not be.
A dialect continuum describes a geographical sequence of language varieties where adjacent varieties are mutually intelligible, but intelligibility decreases between more distant varieties.
Does the term 'dialect' in countries like Italy and France often imply a socially or politically dominant status?
Answer: False
Colloquially, the term 'dialect' in countries like Italy and France often implies a socially or politically subordinated status, rather than dominance.
Do political factors have minimal influence on classifying speech varieties as languages or dialects?
Answer: False
Political factors exert significant influence on the classification of speech varieties as languages or dialects, often shaping national identity and political claims.
Is Italy often cited because its regional languages, historically distinct from Latin, are commonly called 'dialects' of Italian?
Answer: True
Italy is frequently cited because many regional languages, which evolved independently from Latin, are colloquially referred to as 'dialects' of Italian, reflecting a sociopolitical hierarchy.
Did the Tsarist Government of the Russian Empire recognize Ukrainian as a distinct language separate from Russian?
Answer: False
The Tsarist Government classified Ukrainian as a dialect of Russian, rather than a distinct language, as a means of asserting political and cultural dominance.
Does recognizing a speech variety as a 'language' potentially strengthen claims for national identity and statehood?
Answer: True
Classifying a speech variety as a distinct 'language' can bolster claims for national identity and sovereignty, whereas classifying it as a 'dialect' may imply a subordinate status.
Does the phrase 'A language is a dialect with an army and navy' suggest that linguistic criteria are the sole determinants of language status?
Answer: False
This aphorism emphasizes that political power and statehood, rather than purely linguistic criteria, often determine whether a speech variety is recognized as a 'language'.
Do Bulgarian linguists universally classify Macedonian as a distinct language separate from Bulgarian?
Answer: False
The classification of Macedonian by Bulgarian linguists is often considered politically motivated, viewing it as a dialect of Bulgarian rather than a distinct language.
Is the classification of 'Moldovan' as a distinct language from Romanian primarily based on clear linguistic divergence?
Answer: False
The classification of 'Moldovan' is politically charged, with arguments for its distinctness often driven by political motivations rather than significant linguistic divergence from Romanian.
In colloquial usage, particularly in Italy and France, the term 'dialect' often implies:
Answer: A socially or politically subordinated status.
Colloquially, especially in Italy and France, the term 'dialect' often carries a connotation of social or political subordination relative to a dominant standard language.
The saying, "A language is a dialect with an army and navy," primarily emphasizes the role of:
Answer: Political power and statehood in defining language status.
This aphorism highlights that political power and statehood are often decisive factors in elevating a speech variety to the status of a 'language'.
The Tsarist Government classified Ukrainian as a dialect of Russian primarily due to:
Answer: A desire to assert political and cultural dominance.
The classification of Ukrainian as a dialect of Russian by the Tsarist government was primarily driven by a political agenda to assert dominance and consolidate cultural identity under Russian rule.
The classification of Macedonian speech varieties by Bulgarian linguists is often described as:
Answer: Politically motivated rather than strictly linguistic.
The classification of Macedonian speech varieties by Bulgarian linguists is frequently characterized as politically motivated, reflecting nationalistic perspectives rather than purely linguistic analysis.
What is the primary reason for the political charge surrounding the classification of 'Moldovan' language?
Answer: Some advocate for it as a separate language for political reasons, despite linguistic consensus it's Romanian.
The classification of 'Moldovan' is politically contentious because certain groups advocate for its status as a separate language for political reasons, despite a prevailing linguistic consensus that it is essentially Romanian.
The Russian Empire's classification of Ukrainian and Belarusian as dialects of Russian served primarily to:
Answer: Consolidate linguistic and cultural identity under Russian dominance.
Classifying Ukrainian and Belarusian as dialects of Russian by the Russian Empire served to consolidate linguistic and cultural identity under Russian dominance, thereby diminishing the perceived distinctiveness of these groups.
What is the 'Hindi-Urdu controversy' mainly about?
Answer: The use of different scripts and divergence in formal vocabulary.
The Hindi-Urdu controversy primarily concerns their differing scripts (Devanagari for Hindi, Perso-Arabic for Urdu) and the divergence in their formal vocabularies, despite significant spoken mutual intelligibility.
The historical classification of Ukrainian as a 'Polonized dialect' by the Russian Empire suggests:
Answer: A political framing to deny Ukrainian distinctiveness from Russian.
The classification of Ukrainian as a 'Polonized dialect' by the Russian Empire was a political strategy aimed at denying its distinctiveness from Russian and reinforcing imperial control.
Is Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) the primary everyday spoken language across all Arabic-speaking regions?
Answer: False
Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) is primarily used for formal written communication and media, while diverse spoken dialects serve as the primary everyday languages in Arabic-speaking regions.
In Switzerland, is Standard German the language used for most everyday interactions?
Answer: False
In Switzerland, Swiss German dialects are predominantly used for everyday interactions, while Standard German is reserved for formal contexts such as education and media.
Are Hindi and Urdu completely mutually unintelligible in their spoken forms?
Answer: False
While Hindi and Urdu have distinct scripts and formal vocabularies, their spoken forms exhibit considerable mutual intelligibility.
Is Modern Italian primarily based on the Venetian dialect?
Answer: False
Modern Italian is primarily based on the Florentine dialect of Tuscany, which gained prominence through influential literary works.
Are spoken varieties of Chinese, like Mandarin and Cantonese, generally mutually intelligible?
Answer: False
Spoken varieties of Chinese, such as Mandarin and Cantonese, are often mutually unintelligible due to significant divergence in pronunciation and grammar over time, despite sharing a common writing system.
Are dialects less common in Southern Germany than in Northern Germany?
Answer: False
Dialects are generally more prevalent in Southern Germany compared to Northern Germany, and less common in urban areas than in rural settings.
Did conscription during World War I help spread Standard Italian by forcing soldiers from different regions to communicate?
Answer: True
Conscription during World War I facilitated the spread of Standard Italian as soldiers from diverse linguistic backgrounds were compelled to communicate in a common tongue.
Have regional Italian varieties, sometimes called 'dialects,' developed independently of the Tuscan standard?
Answer: False
Many regional Italian languages, colloquially termed 'dialects,' evolved separately from Latin and have distinct historical trajectories, rather than developing independently from the Tuscan standard after its establishment.
Does the Serbo-Croatian language include variants like Serbian and Croatian, both based on the Shtokavian dialect?
Answer: True
The Serbo-Croatian language encompasses variants such as Serbian and Croatian, which are largely based on the Shtokavian dialect, though other dialects also exist within the region.
How do spoken Arabic dialects relate to Modern Standard Arabic (MSA)?
Answer: Spoken dialects are used daily, while MSA is the prestige dialect for written communication.
Spoken Arabic dialects are used for daily communication, while Modern Standard Arabic serves as the prestige dialect for formal written communication and media across the Arab world.
In Switzerland, what is the typical role of Standard German versus Swiss German dialects?
Answer: Swiss German dialects are used for everyday life, Standard German for education and media.
In Switzerland, Swiss German dialects are the primary means of everyday communication, while Standard German is predominantly used in formal settings like education and media.
Why is Italy often used as an example regarding the term 'dialect'?
Answer: Because many historically separate regional languages are colloquially called 'dialects' of Italian.
Italy is frequently cited because numerous regional languages, which possess distinct historical development, are often colloquially labeled as 'dialects' of Italian, reflecting a sociopolitical hierarchy.
What is the primary reason cited for the mutual unintelligibility between spoken varieties of Chinese like Mandarin and Cantonese?
Answer: Significant divergence in pronunciation and grammar over time.
The mutual unintelligibility between spoken Chinese varieties like Mandarin and Cantonese stems primarily from significant divergence in their pronunciation and grammatical structures over historical periods.
How do Hindi and Urdu differ significantly, despite considerable spoken mutual intelligibility?
Answer: Hindi uses Devanagari script and Sanskrit-based vocabulary, while Urdu uses Perso-Arabic script and Persian/Arabic vocabulary.
Hindi and Urdu differ significantly in their scripts (Devanagari vs. Perso-Arabic) and formal vocabulary, with Hindi drawing more from Sanskrit and Urdu incorporating more Persian and Arabic terms, despite considerable spoken mutual intelligibility.
What does the source suggest about the relationship between the Florentine dialect and Modern Italian?
Answer: Modern Italian evolved primarily from the Florentine dialect.
The source indicates that Modern Italian largely evolved from the Florentine dialect of Tuscany, which gained prominence through influential literary works.
What is the significance of Malay being described as a 'pluricentric' language?
Answer: It has multiple standardized national varieties used in different nation-states.
Malay is considered 'pluricentric' because it encompasses multiple standardized national varieties, such as Malaysian and Indonesian, each used within different nation-states.
According to the source, what is the status of Bhojpuri?
Answer: It is classified as a dialect of Hindi and lacks official status in India's Eighth Schedule.
Bhojpuri, spoken by a large population, is often classified as a dialect of Hindi and does not hold official status in India's Eighth Schedule, illustrating how large linguistic communities can be categorized under a dominant language.
What role did conscription during World War I play in the diffusion of Italian?
Answer: It forced soldiers from diverse backgrounds to communicate in a common tongue, spreading Italian.
Conscription during World War I facilitated the spread of Standard Italian by requiring soldiers from various regions to communicate in a common language, thereby increasing exposure and usage.
What is the relationship between the Eastern Lombard dialect and other Romance languages mentioned?
Answer: It may have more intelligibility with Catalan or French than with Italian or Sicilian.
Eastern Lombard, a Gallo-Italic language, may exhibit greater mutual intelligibility with Catalan or French than with Italian or Sicilian, illustrating complex linguistic relationships across traditional boundaries.