Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?

Forward Operating Base Danger: Operational History and Key Events in Iraq

At a Glance

Title: Forward Operating Base Danger: Operational History and Key Events in Iraq

Total Categories: 5

Category Stats

  • I. Forward Operating Base Danger: Overview and Context: 8 flashcards, 17 questions
  • II. Garrisoning Divisions and Operational Timeline: 12 flashcards, 28 questions
  • III. Significant Incidents: The Fragging at FOB Danger: 3 flashcards, 8 questions
  • IV. Comparative Analysis: FOB Danger vs. East Baghdad Installations: 4 flashcards, 11 questions
  • V. Transition and Deactivation: 2 flashcards, 5 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 29
  • True/False Questions: 35
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 34
  • Total Questions: 69

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Forward Operating Base Danger: Operational History and Key Events in Iraq

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Forward Operating Base Danger" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Forward Operating Base Danger: Operational History and Key Events in Iraq

Study Guide: Forward Operating Base Danger: Operational History and Key Events in Iraq

I. Forward Operating Base Danger: Overview and Context

Forward Operating Base Danger was primarily operated by the United States Marine Corps.

Answer: False

The source explicitly states that Forward Operating Base Danger was operated by the United States Army, not the Marine Corps.

Related Concepts:

  • Define Forward Operating Base Danger and identify the primary military force responsible for its operation.: Forward Operating Base Danger (FOB Danger) was a United States Army forward operating base situated in Tikrit, Iraq.

Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit served as the central point of Forward Operating Base Danger.

Answer: True

The source confirms that Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit was indeed the central point of Forward Operating Base Danger.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the prominent architectural feature that served as the central point of Forward Operating Base Danger.: Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit served as the central point and dominant structure of Forward Operating Base Danger.
  • Identify the specific architectural component within Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex that formed the nucleus of FOB Danger.: FOB Danger was centered on Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex, indicating that the entire complex constituted the core of the base.

The initial designation of the installation that subsequently became Forward Operating Base Danger was Forward Operating Base Patriot.

Answer: False

The installation that became Forward Operating Base Danger was initially named Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, not Patriot.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the original designation of the installation that later became Forward Operating Base Danger.: The installation that evolved into Forward Operating Base Danger was initially established as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse.

Forward Operating Base Danger was situated in East Baghdad.

Answer: False

Forward Operating Base Danger was located in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, not East Baghdad. Other FOBs like Iron Horse, Patriot, and Loyalty were in East Baghdad.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the geographical location of Forward Operating Base Danger.: Forward Operating Base Danger was strategically located in Tikrit, Iraq.
  • Elaborate on the primary geographical difference between FOB Danger and the Forward Operating Bases located in East Baghdad.: FOB Danger was situated in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, whereas other Forward Operating Bases such as Iron Horse, Patriot, and Loyalty were located in East Baghdad.

Forward Operating Base Danger was primarily utilized for humanitarian aid distribution during the Iraq War.

Answer: False

The primary purpose of Forward Operating Base Danger was to support tactical military operations, not humanitarian aid distribution.

Related Concepts:

  • Articulate the primary strategic purpose of Forward Operating Base Danger.: Forward Operating Base Danger functioned as a critical military installation for the United States Army during the occupation of Iraq, primarily supporting tactical operations.
  • Categorize Forward Operating Base Danger as a specific type of military installation.: Forward Operating Base Danger was categorized as a forward operating base, a secure operational facility designed to support military operations in a forward deployed area.

Forward Operating Base Danger was associated with the Vietnam War.

Answer: False

Forward Operating Base Danger was associated with the Iraq War, not the Vietnam War.

Related Concepts:

  • To which major military conflict was Forward Operating Base Danger primarily associated?: Forward Operating Base Danger was a significant installation during the Iraq War.

The primary function of Forward Operating Base Danger was to serve as a prison facility.

Answer: False

Forward Operating Base Danger's primary purpose was to support tactical military operations, not to house a prison. The East Baghdad FOB Ironhorse housed a prison.

Related Concepts:

  • Articulate the primary strategic purpose of Forward Operating Base Danger.: Forward Operating Base Danger functioned as a critical military installation for the United States Army during the occupation of Iraq, primarily supporting tactical operations.
  • Categorize Forward Operating Base Danger as a specific type of military installation.: Forward Operating Base Danger was categorized as a forward operating base, a secure operational facility designed to support military operations in a forward deployed area.

The presidential palace complex in Tikrit constituted the core of Forward Operating Base Danger.

Answer: True

The source indicates that Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit served as the central point and core of Forward Operating Base Danger.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the prominent architectural feature that served as the central point of Forward Operating Base Danger.: Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit served as the central point and dominant structure of Forward Operating Base Danger.
  • Identify the specific architectural component within Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex that formed the nucleus of FOB Danger.: FOB Danger was centered on Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex, indicating that the entire complex constituted the core of the base.

Forward Operating Base Danger was situated in the northern region of Iraq.

Answer: True

Forward Operating Base Danger was located in Tikrit, which is in Northern Iraq.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the geographical location of Forward Operating Base Danger.: Forward Operating Base Danger was strategically located in Tikrit, Iraq.
  • Elaborate on the primary geographical difference between FOB Danger and the Forward Operating Bases located in East Baghdad.: FOB Danger was situated in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, whereas other Forward Operating Bases such as Iron Horse, Patriot, and Loyalty were located in East Baghdad.

Which military branch primarily operated Forward Operating Base Danger?

Answer: United States Army

Forward Operating Base Danger was operated by the United States Army.

Related Concepts:

  • Define Forward Operating Base Danger and identify the primary military force responsible for its operation.: Forward Operating Base Danger (FOB Danger) was a United States Army forward operating base situated in Tikrit, Iraq.
  • Enumerate the specific United States Army units that occupied Forward Operating Base Danger.: Forward Operating Base Danger was occupied by the United States Army's 4th Infantry Division, 1st Infantry Division, and 42nd Infantry Division at different points during its operational history.

What was the initial designation of the installation in Tikrit that subsequently became Forward Operating Base Danger?

Answer: Forward Operating Base Ironhorse

The installation that became Forward Operating Base Danger was initially founded as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the original designation of the installation that later became Forward Operating Base Danger.: The installation that evolved into Forward Operating Base Danger was initially established as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse.

What prominent structure served as the central point and dominated Forward Operating Base Danger?

Answer: Saddam Hussein's presidential palace

Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit served as the central point and dominant structure of Forward Operating Base Danger.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the prominent architectural feature that served as the central point of Forward Operating Base Danger.: Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit served as the central point and dominant structure of Forward Operating Base Danger.
  • Identify the specific architectural component within Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex that formed the nucleus of FOB Danger.: FOB Danger was centered on Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex, indicating that the entire complex constituted the core of the base.

What constituted the primary strategic objective of Forward Operating Base Danger for the United States Army?

Answer: To support tactical military operations.

Forward Operating Base Danger served as a military installation used to support tactical operations for the United States Army.

Related Concepts:

  • Articulate the primary strategic purpose of Forward Operating Base Danger.: Forward Operating Base Danger functioned as a critical military installation for the United States Army during the occupation of Iraq, primarily supporting tactical operations.
  • Categorize Forward Operating Base Danger as a specific type of military installation.: Forward Operating Base Danger was categorized as a forward operating base, a secure operational facility designed to support military operations in a forward deployed area.

With which major military conflict was Forward Operating Base Danger associated?

Answer: Iraq War

Forward Operating Base Danger was associated with the Iraq War.

Related Concepts:

  • To which major military conflict was Forward Operating Base Danger primarily associated?: Forward Operating Base Danger was a significant installation during the Iraq War.

What classification of military installation was Forward Operating Base Danger?

Answer: A forward operating base

Forward Operating Base Danger was classified as a forward operating base, a secure operational facility used to support military operations.

Related Concepts:

  • Articulate the primary strategic purpose of Forward Operating Base Danger.: Forward Operating Base Danger functioned as a critical military installation for the United States Army during the occupation of Iraq, primarily supporting tactical operations.
  • Categorize Forward Operating Base Danger as a specific type of military installation.: Forward Operating Base Danger was categorized as a forward operating base, a secure operational facility designed to support military operations in a forward deployed area.

In which specific geographical region of Iraq was Forward Operating Base Danger situated?

Answer: Northern Iraq

Forward Operating Base Danger was located in Tikrit, which is in Northern Iraq.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the geographical location of Forward Operating Base Danger.: Forward Operating Base Danger was strategically located in Tikrit, Iraq.
  • Elaborate on the primary geographical difference between FOB Danger and the Forward Operating Bases located in East Baghdad.: FOB Danger was situated in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, whereas other Forward Operating Bases such as Iron Horse, Patriot, and Loyalty were located in East Baghdad.

What function did Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit serve for Forward Operating Base Danger?

Answer: It served as the central point of the base.

Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit dominated Forward Operating Base Danger, serving as its central point.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify the prominent architectural feature that served as the central point of Forward Operating Base Danger.: Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex in Tikrit served as the central point and dominant structure of Forward Operating Base Danger.
  • Identify the specific architectural component within Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex that formed the nucleus of FOB Danger.: FOB Danger was centered on Saddam Hussein's presidential palace complex, indicating that the entire complex constituted the core of the base.

II. Garrisoning Divisions and Operational Timeline

Forward Operating Base Danger was utilized by the United States Army from 2003 until December 2005.

Answer: False

The United States Army operated Forward Operating Base Danger from 2003 until November 2005, not December 2005.

Related Concepts:

  • Outline the operational timeframe of Forward Operating Base Danger under United States Army control.: The United States Army operated Forward Operating Base Danger from 2003 until its handover in November 2005.

The 4th Infantry Division garrisoned FOB Danger from March 2004 to February 2005.

Answer: False

The 4th Infantry Division garrisoned FOB Danger from March 2003 to March 2004, not from March 2004 to February 2005. The latter period was for the 1st Infantry Division.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the period during which the 4th Infantry Division garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 4th Infantry Division maintained garrison duties at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2003 to March 2004.
  • State the period of the 4th Infantry Division's operational presence at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 4th Infantry Division's operational presence at Forward Operating Base Danger spanned from March 2003 to March 2004.

The 42nd Infantry Division was the final United States Army division to garrison Forward Operating Base Danger prior to its handover.

Answer: True

The 42nd Infantry Division garrisoned FOB Danger from February to November 2005, and the base was handed over in November 2005, making them the last division.

Related Concepts:

  • State the duration of the 42nd Infantry Division's garrison at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 42nd Infantry Division served as the garrison force for Forward Operating Base Danger from February to November 2005.
  • Specify the operational duration of the 42nd Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 42nd Infantry Division maintained its presence at Forward Operating Base Danger for the period spanning February to November 2005.
  • Provide the date of the official handover of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government.: Forward Operating Base Danger was formally transferred to the government of Iraq in November 2005.

The 1st Infantry Division maintained garrison duties at Forward Operating Base Danger for a longer duration than the 4th Infantry Division.

Answer: False

The 1st Infantry Division garrisoned FOB Danger from March 2004 to February 2005 (11 months), while the 4th Infantry Division garrisoned it from March 2003 to March 2004 (12 months). Therefore, the 1st ID's tenure was shorter.

Related Concepts:

  • Indicate the timeframe of the 1st Infantry Division's garrison at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 1st Infantry Division was responsible for garrisoning Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005.
  • Specify the period during which the 4th Infantry Division garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 4th Infantry Division maintained garrison duties at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2003 to March 2004.
  • Indicate the length of the 1st Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 1st Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger extended from March 2004 to February 2005.
  • State the period of the 4th Infantry Division's operational presence at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 4th Infantry Division's operational presence at Forward Operating Base Danger spanned from March 2003 to March 2004.

The 4th Infantry Division served as the headquarters garrison for the installation, then known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, from April 2003 until its redesignation in May 2004.

Answer: True

The source confirms that the 4th Infantry Division was the headquarters garrison for FOB Ironhorse from April 2003 until its redesignation in May 2004.

Related Concepts:

  • Which United States Army division served as the initial headquarters garrison for the installation known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse?: The 4th Infantry Division functioned as the headquarters garrison for the installation, then designated Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, from April 2003 until its handover and redesignation in May 2004.
  • When did the 4th Infantry Division conclude its role as headquarters garrison for the installation then known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse?: The 4th Infantry Division's command as headquarters garrison for the installation, initially designated Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, concluded in May 2004 with its transfer and redesignation under the 1st Infantry Division.

The 1st Infantry Division Headquarters issued a press release concerning 'Task Force Danger' in July 2004.

Answer: True

Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division, issued a press release on July 4, 2004, related to 'Task Force Danger'.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the involvement of the 1st Infantry Division Headquarters concerning 'Task Force Danger'.: Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division, issued a press release on July 4, 2004, pertaining to 'Task Force Danger,' thereby indicating its command or operational oversight related to the base.

The 42nd Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger spanned approximately nine months.

Answer: True

The 42nd Infantry Division was present from February to November 2005, which is a duration of nine months.

Related Concepts:

  • State the duration of the 42nd Infantry Division's garrison at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 42nd Infantry Division served as the garrison force for Forward Operating Base Danger from February to November 2005.
  • Specify the operational duration of the 42nd Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 42nd Infantry Division maintained its presence at Forward Operating Base Danger for the period spanning February to November 2005.

The 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison at the installation (then Forward Operating Base Ironhorse) concluded in March 2004.

Answer: False

The 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for FOB Ironhorse ended in May 2004, not March 2004.

Related Concepts:

  • Which United States Army division served as the initial headquarters garrison for the installation known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse?: The 4th Infantry Division functioned as the headquarters garrison for the installation, then designated Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, from April 2003 until its handover and redesignation in May 2004.
  • When did the 4th Infantry Division conclude its role as headquarters garrison for the installation then known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse?: The 4th Infantry Division's command as headquarters garrison for the installation, initially designated Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, concluded in May 2004 with its transfer and redesignation under the 1st Infantry Division.

The 1st Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger concluded in February 2005.

Answer: True

The 1st Infantry Division was present at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005, confirming its conclusion in February 2005.

Related Concepts:

  • Indicate the timeframe of the 1st Infantry Division's garrison at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 1st Infantry Division was responsible for garrisoning Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005.
  • Indicate the length of the 1st Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 1st Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger extended from March 2004 to February 2005.

The United States Army operated Forward Operating Base Danger for approximately two years.

Answer: True

FOB Danger was in use from 2003 until November 2005, which is approximately two years (2003, 2004, part of 2005).

Related Concepts:

  • Outline the operational timeframe of Forward Operating Base Danger under United States Army control.: The United States Army operated Forward Operating Base Danger from 2003 until its handover in November 2005.

The 4th Infantry Division was the inaugural United States Army division to garrison the installation that later became Forward Operating Base Danger.

Answer: True

The 4th Infantry Division garrisoned FOB Danger from March 2003 to March 2004, making it the first division to do so.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the period during which the 4th Infantry Division garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 4th Infantry Division maintained garrison duties at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2003 to March 2004.
  • State the period of the 4th Infantry Division's operational presence at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 4th Infantry Division's operational presence at Forward Operating Base Danger spanned from March 2003 to March 2004.
  • List the United States Army divisions that successively garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 4th Infantry Division, 1st Infantry Division, and 42nd Infantry Division of the United States Army each served as garrison forces at Forward Operating Base Danger during its operational tenure.

The 1st Infantry Division assumed garrison responsibilities at Forward Operating Base Danger directly from the 42nd Infantry Division.

Answer: False

The 4th Infantry Division garrisoned FOB Danger from March 2003 to March 2004, followed by the 1st Infantry Division from March 2004 to February 2005, and then the 42nd Infantry Division from February to November 2005. Thus, the 1st ID did not take over directly from the 42nd ID.

Related Concepts:

  • Indicate the timeframe of the 1st Infantry Division's garrison at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 1st Infantry Division was responsible for garrisoning Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005.
  • State the duration of the 42nd Infantry Division's garrison at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 42nd Infantry Division served as the garrison force for Forward Operating Base Danger from February to November 2005.
  • Indicate the length of the 1st Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 1st Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger extended from March 2004 to February 2005.

The 4th Infantry Division's tenure at the Tikrit installation concluded with its redesignation under the 1st Infantry Division in May 2004.

Answer: True

The 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for the installation (then FOB Ironhorse) ended with its handover and redesignation under the 1st Infantry Division in May 2004.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the 4th Infantry Division conclude its role as headquarters garrison for the installation then known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse?: The 4th Infantry Division's command as headquarters garrison for the installation, initially designated Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, concluded in May 2004 with its transfer and redesignation under the 1st Infantry Division.

The term 'Task Force Danger' was associated with the 1st Infantry Division's command or operational involvement with Forward Operating Base Danger.

Answer: True

Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division, issued a press release on July 4, 2004, related to 'Task Force Danger,' indicating their command or operational involvement with the base.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the involvement of the 1st Infantry Division Headquarters concerning 'Task Force Danger'.: Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division, issued a press release on July 4, 2004, pertaining to 'Task Force Danger,' thereby indicating its command or operational oversight related to the base.

Which United States Army division maintained garrison duties at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2003 to March 2004?

Answer: 4th Infantry Division

The 4th Infantry Division garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2003 to March 2004.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the period during which the 4th Infantry Division garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 4th Infantry Division maintained garrison duties at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2003 to March 2004.
  • State the period of the 4th Infantry Division's operational presence at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 4th Infantry Division's operational presence at Forward Operating Base Danger spanned from March 2003 to March 2004.

Which United States Army division garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005?

Answer: 1st Infantry Division

The 1st Infantry Division garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005.

Related Concepts:

  • Indicate the timeframe of the 1st Infantry Division's garrison at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 1st Infantry Division was responsible for garrisoning Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005.
  • Indicate the length of the 1st Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 1st Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger extended from March 2004 to February 2005.

Which United States Army division maintained garrison duties at Forward Operating Base Danger from February to November 2005?

Answer: 42nd Infantry Division

The 42nd Infantry Division garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger from February to November 2005.

Related Concepts:

  • State the duration of the 42nd Infantry Division's garrison at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 42nd Infantry Division served as the garrison force for Forward Operating Base Danger from February to November 2005.
  • Specify the operational duration of the 42nd Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 42nd Infantry Division maintained its presence at Forward Operating Base Danger for the period spanning February to November 2005.

The 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for the Tikrit installation (then Forward Operating Base Ironhorse) concluded in May 2004 with its redesignation under which division?

Answer: 1st Infantry Division

The 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for the installation, then known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, ended with its handover and redesignation under the 1st Infantry Division in May 2004.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the period during which the 4th Infantry Division garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 4th Infantry Division maintained garrison duties at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2003 to March 2004.
  • When did the 4th Infantry Division conclude its role as headquarters garrison for the installation then known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse?: The 4th Infantry Division's command as headquarters garrison for the installation, initially designated Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, concluded in May 2004 with its transfer and redesignation under the 1st Infantry Division.

Which of the following sets of divisions accurately identifies those that garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger at different periods?

Answer: 4th Infantry Division, 1st Infantry Division, 42nd Infantry Division

The 4th Infantry Division, 1st Infantry Division, and 42nd Infantry Division of the United States Army garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger at different times.

Related Concepts:

  • List the United States Army divisions that successively garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 4th Infantry Division, 1st Infantry Division, and 42nd Infantry Division of the United States Army each served as garrison forces at Forward Operating Base Danger during its operational tenure.
  • Enumerate the specific United States Army units that occupied Forward Operating Base Danger.: Forward Operating Base Danger was occupied by the United States Army's 4th Infantry Division, 1st Infantry Division, and 42nd Infantry Division at different points during its operational history.

What was the operational duration of the 4th Infantry Division's presence at Forward Operating Base Danger?

Answer: March 2003 to March 2004

The 4th Infantry Division was present at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2003 to March 2004.

Related Concepts:

  • Specify the period during which the 4th Infantry Division garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 4th Infantry Division maintained garrison duties at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2003 to March 2004.
  • State the period of the 4th Infantry Division's operational presence at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 4th Infantry Division's operational presence at Forward Operating Base Danger spanned from March 2003 to March 2004.

Which United States Army division maintained a presence at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005?

Answer: 1st Infantry Division

The 1st Infantry Division was present at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005.

Related Concepts:

  • Indicate the timeframe of the 1st Infantry Division's garrison at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 1st Infantry Division was responsible for garrisoning Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005.
  • Indicate the length of the 1st Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 1st Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger extended from March 2004 to February 2005.

Approximately how many months did the 42nd Infantry Division maintain its presence at Forward Operating Base Danger?

Answer: 9 months

The 42nd Infantry Division was present at Forward Operating Base Danger from February to November 2005, which constitutes a period of nine months.

Related Concepts:

  • State the duration of the 42nd Infantry Division's garrison at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 42nd Infantry Division served as the garrison force for Forward Operating Base Danger from February to November 2005.
  • Specify the operational duration of the 42nd Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 42nd Infantry Division maintained its presence at Forward Operating Base Danger for the period spanning February to November 2005.

The operational period of Forward Operating Base Danger under the United States Army extended from:

Answer: 2003-2005

Forward Operating Base Danger was in use by the United States Army from 2003 until November 2005.

Related Concepts:

  • Outline the operational timeframe of Forward Operating Base Danger under United States Army control.: The United States Army operated Forward Operating Base Danger from 2003 until its handover in November 2005.

In which month and year did the 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for the Tikrit installation (then Forward Operating Base Ironhorse) conclude?

Answer: May 2004

The 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for the installation, then known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, ended in May 2004.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the 4th Infantry Division conclude its role as headquarters garrison for the installation then known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse?: The 4th Infantry Division's command as headquarters garrison for the installation, initially designated Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, concluded in May 2004 with its transfer and redesignation under the 1st Infantry Division.

Which of the following divisions was NOT explicitly mentioned as having occupied Forward Operating Base Danger?

Answer: 3rd Infantry Division

The 4th, 1st, and 42nd Infantry Divisions are listed as having garrisoned FOB Danger. The 3rd Infantry Division is mentioned in relation to the East Baghdad FOB Iron Horse, not FOB Danger in Tikrit.

Related Concepts:

  • Enumerate the specific United States Army units that occupied Forward Operating Base Danger.: Forward Operating Base Danger was occupied by the United States Army's 4th Infantry Division, 1st Infantry Division, and 42nd Infantry Division at different points during its operational history.
  • List the United States Army divisions that successively garrisoned Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 4th Infantry Division, 1st Infantry Division, and 42nd Infantry Division of the United States Army each served as garrison forces at Forward Operating Base Danger during its operational tenure.

The Tikrit installation, initially designated Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, was transferred and redesignated under the 1st Infantry Division in May 2004 by which preceding division?

Answer: 4th Infantry Division

The 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for the installation, then known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, ended with its handover and redesignation under the 1st Infantry Division in May 2004.

Related Concepts:

  • When did the 4th Infantry Division conclude its role as headquarters garrison for the installation then known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse?: The 4th Infantry Division's command as headquarters garrison for the installation, initially designated Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, concluded in May 2004 with its transfer and redesignation under the 1st Infantry Division.

Approximately how many months did the 1st Infantry Division maintain its presence at Forward Operating Base Danger?

Answer: 11 months

The 1st Infantry Division was present at Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005, which is a duration of 11 months.

Related Concepts:

  • Indicate the timeframe of the 1st Infantry Division's garrison at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 1st Infantry Division was responsible for garrisoning Forward Operating Base Danger from March 2004 to February 2005.
  • Indicate the length of the 1st Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 1st Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger extended from March 2004 to February 2005.

In which month and year did the 4th Infantry Division's tenure as headquarters garrison for the installation (then Forward Operating Base Ironhorse) commence?

Answer: April 2003

The 4th Infantry Division served as the headquarters garrison for the installation when it was known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse from April 2003.

Related Concepts:

  • Which United States Army division served as the initial headquarters garrison for the installation known as Forward Operating Base Ironhorse?: The 4th Infantry Division functioned as the headquarters garrison for the installation, then designated Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, from April 2003 until its handover and redesignation in May 2004.

III. Significant Incidents: The Fragging at FOB Danger

Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen were killed at FOB Danger, marking the first recorded instance of fragging among United States forces during the Iraq War.

Answer: True

The source explicitly states that the deaths of Captain Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Allen at FOB Danger constituted the first recorded fragging incident among US forces in the Iraq War.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen, and explain the circumstances of their deaths at FOB Danger.: Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen were officers of the 42nd Infantry Division who were killed at Forward Operating Base Danger on June 7, 2005. Their deaths were attributed to fragging, defined as the intentional killing or attempted killing of a fellow soldier, often a superior officer.
  • Describe the notable incident that took place at Forward Operating Base Danger on June 7, 2005.: On June 7, 2005, Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen of the 42nd Infantry Division were killed at Forward Operating Base Danger, marking the first recorded instance of fragging among United States forces during the Iraq War.
  • Provide a military definition of 'fragging' as presented in the context of the incident at FOB Danger.: In military parlance, 'fragging' denotes the act of intentionally killing or attempting to kill a fellow soldier, frequently a superior officer, often, but not exclusively, using a fragmentation grenade. The incident at FOB Danger involving Captain Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Allen represented the inaugural recorded instance of fragging among United States forces during the Iraq War.

Fragging, as defined in the source, exclusively refers to the killing of a fellow soldier using a fragmentation grenade.

Answer: False

The definition of fragging in the source clarifies that while a fragmentation grenade is typically associated, the term can apply to other methods of killing or attempting to kill a fellow soldier.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide a military definition of 'fragging' as presented in the context of the incident at FOB Danger.: In military parlance, 'fragging' denotes the act of intentionally killing or attempting to kill a fellow soldier, frequently a superior officer, often, but not exclusively, using a fragmentation grenade. The incident at FOB Danger involving Captain Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Allen represented the inaugural recorded instance of fragging among United States forces during the Iraq War.

The incident involving Captain Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Allen transpired in 2004.

Answer: False

The incident involving Captain Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Allen occurred on June 7, 2005, not in 2004.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen, and explain the circumstances of their deaths at FOB Danger.: Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen were officers of the 42nd Infantry Division who were killed at Forward Operating Base Danger on June 7, 2005. Their deaths were attributed to fragging, defined as the intentional killing or attempted killing of a fellow soldier, often a superior officer.

The term 'fragging' specifically denotes the use of a fragmentation grenade.

Answer: False

While fragging typically involves a fragmentation grenade, the source clarifies that the term can apply to other methods of killing or attempting to kill a fellow soldier.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide a military definition of 'fragging' as presented in the context of the incident at FOB Danger.: In military parlance, 'fragging' denotes the act of intentionally killing or attempting to kill a fellow soldier, frequently a superior officer, often, but not exclusively, using a fragmentation grenade. The incident at FOB Danger involving Captain Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Allen represented the inaugural recorded instance of fragging among United States forces during the Iraq War.

The fragging incident at Forward Operating Base Danger involved officers from the 1st Infantry Division.

Answer: False

The officers involved in the fragging incident, Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen, were from the 42nd Infantry Division, not the 1st Infantry Division.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the notable incident that took place at Forward Operating Base Danger on June 7, 2005.: On June 7, 2005, Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen of the 42nd Infantry Division were killed at Forward Operating Base Danger, marking the first recorded instance of fragging among United States forces during the Iraq War.
  • Identify Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen, and explain the circumstances of their deaths at FOB Danger.: Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen were officers of the 42nd Infantry Division who were killed at Forward Operating Base Danger on June 7, 2005. Their deaths were attributed to fragging, defined as the intentional killing or attempted killing of a fellow soldier, often a superior officer.

On what specific date did Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen of the 42nd Infantry Division perish at Forward Operating Base Danger?

Answer: June 7, 2005

Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen were killed at Forward Operating Base Danger on June 7, 2005.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen, and explain the circumstances of their deaths at FOB Danger.: Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen were officers of the 42nd Infantry Division who were killed at Forward Operating Base Danger on June 7, 2005. Their deaths were attributed to fragging, defined as the intentional killing or attempted killing of a fellow soldier, often a superior officer.
  • Describe the notable incident that took place at Forward Operating Base Danger on June 7, 2005.: On June 7, 2005, Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen of the 42nd Infantry Division were killed at Forward Operating Base Danger, marking the first recorded instance of fragging among United States forces during the Iraq War.

The fragging incident at Forward Operating Base Danger on June 7, 2005, involved officers from which United States Army division?

Answer: 42nd Infantry Division

Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen, who were killed in the fragging incident, were from the 42nd Infantry Division.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the notable incident that took place at Forward Operating Base Danger on June 7, 2005.: On June 7, 2005, Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen of the 42nd Infantry Division were killed at Forward Operating Base Danger, marking the first recorded instance of fragging among United States forces during the Iraq War.

Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen were officers affiliated with which United States Army division?

Answer: 42nd Infantry Division

Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen were officers from the 42nd Infantry Division.

Related Concepts:

  • Identify Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen, and explain the circumstances of their deaths at FOB Danger.: Captain Phillip Esposito and 1st Lieutenant Louis Allen were officers of the 42nd Infantry Division who were killed at Forward Operating Base Danger on June 7, 2005. Their deaths were attributed to fragging, defined as the intentional killing or attempted killing of a fellow soldier, often a superior officer.

IV. Comparative Analysis: FOB Danger vs. East Baghdad Installations

Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, located in East Baghdad, was subsequently redesignated as FOB Danger.

Answer: False

The Forward Operating Base Ironhorse in East Baghdad was renamed FOB Patriot and then FOB Loyalty. Forward Operating Base Danger was a separate installation in Tikrit, initially named FOB Ironhorse (Tikrit).

Related Concepts:

  • Distinguish the geographical locations of Forward Operating Base Danger and the Forward Operating Base Ironhorse mentioned in the context of East Baghdad.: Forward Operating Base Danger was situated in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, whereas the other Forward Operating Base Ironhorse was located in East Baghdad and included a prison facility.
  • Elaborate on the primary geographical difference between FOB Danger and the Forward Operating Bases located in East Baghdad.: FOB Danger was situated in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, whereas other Forward Operating Bases such as Iron Horse, Patriot, and Loyalty were located in East Baghdad.
  • List the subsequent designations of the Forward Operating Base Ironhorse located in East Baghdad.: The Forward Operating Base Ironhorse in East Baghdad was later redesignated as FOB Patriot and subsequently as FOB Loyalty during Operations Iraqi Freedom II and III.

The 1st Brigade of the 1st Cavalry Division commenced operations at the Forward Operating Base Iron Horse situated in East Baghdad.

Answer: True

The source explicitly states that the 1st Cavalry Division's 1st Brigade began its operations at FOB Iron Horse in East Baghdad.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the involvement of the 1st Cavalry Division's 1st Brigade and the 3rd Infantry Division with the Forward Operating Bases discussed.: The 1st Brigade of the 1st Cavalry Division commenced operations at FOB Iron Horse in East Baghdad, where the 3rd Infantry Division subsequently arrived in December 2004/January 2005.

The 3rd Infantry Division arrived at the East Baghdad Forward Operating Base Iron Horse in December 2004/January 2005.

Answer: True

The source indicates that the 3rd Infantry Division arrived at the East Baghdad FOB Iron Horse in December/January 2005.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the involvement of the 1st Cavalry Division's 1st Brigade and the 3rd Infantry Division with the Forward Operating Bases discussed.: The 1st Brigade of the 1st Cavalry Division commenced operations at FOB Iron Horse in East Baghdad, where the 3rd Infantry Division subsequently arrived in December 2004/January 2005.

Forward Operating Base Loyalty was a subsequent designation for the Forward Operating Base situated in Tikrit.

Answer: False

FOB Loyalty was a subsequent name for the FOB Ironhorse located in East Baghdad, not the FOB in Tikrit (FOB Danger).

Related Concepts:

  • Elaborate on the primary geographical difference between FOB Danger and the Forward Operating Bases located in East Baghdad.: FOB Danger was situated in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, whereas other Forward Operating Bases such as Iron Horse, Patriot, and Loyalty were located in East Baghdad.
  • List the subsequent designations of the Forward Operating Base Ironhorse located in East Baghdad.: The Forward Operating Base Ironhorse in East Baghdad was later redesignated as FOB Patriot and subsequently as FOB Loyalty during Operations Iraqi Freedom II and III.

Which of the following Forward Operating Bases was situated in East Baghdad and contained a prison facility?

Answer: Forward Operating Base Ironhorse (East Baghdad)

The source indicates that Forward Operating Base Ironhorse in East Baghdad housed a prison.

Related Concepts:

  • Distinguish the geographical locations of Forward Operating Base Danger and the Forward Operating Base Ironhorse mentioned in the context of East Baghdad.: Forward Operating Base Danger was situated in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, whereas the other Forward Operating Base Ironhorse was located in East Baghdad and included a prison facility.
  • Elaborate on the primary geographical difference between FOB Danger and the Forward Operating Bases located in East Baghdad.: FOB Danger was situated in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, whereas other Forward Operating Bases such as Iron Horse, Patriot, and Loyalty were located in East Baghdad.

What was the principal geographical differentiation between Forward Operating Base Danger and the Forward Operating Bases such as Iron Horse, Patriot, and Loyalty?

Answer: FOB Danger was in the North (Tikrit), while others were in East Baghdad.

FOB Danger was located in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, while other FOBs like Iron Horse, Patriot, and Loyalty were situated in East Baghdad.

Related Concepts:

  • Elaborate on the primary geographical difference between FOB Danger and the Forward Operating Bases located in East Baghdad.: FOB Danger was situated in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, whereas other Forward Operating Bases such as Iron Horse, Patriot, and Loyalty were located in East Baghdad.
  • Distinguish the geographical locations of Forward Operating Base Danger and the Forward Operating Base Ironhorse mentioned in the context of East Baghdad.: Forward Operating Base Danger was situated in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, whereas the other Forward Operating Base Ironhorse was located in East Baghdad and included a prison facility.

At which specific Forward Operating Base location did the 1st Brigade of the 1st Cavalry Division commence its operations?

Answer: FOB Iron Horse in East Baghdad

The 1st Cavalry Division's 1st Brigade started at FOB Iron Horse, which was located in East Baghdad.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the involvement of the 1st Cavalry Division's 1st Brigade and the 3rd Infantry Division with the Forward Operating Bases discussed.: The 1st Brigade of the 1st Cavalry Division commenced operations at FOB Iron Horse in East Baghdad, where the 3rd Infantry Division subsequently arrived in December 2004/January 2005.

The Forward Operating Base Ironhorse, which was subsequently redesignated as FOB Patriot and then FOB Loyalty, was situated in:

Answer: East Baghdad

The Forward Operating Base Ironhorse that was renamed FOB Patriot and FOB Loyalty was located in East Baghdad.

Related Concepts:

  • List the subsequent designations of the Forward Operating Base Ironhorse located in East Baghdad.: The Forward Operating Base Ironhorse in East Baghdad was later redesignated as FOB Patriot and subsequently as FOB Loyalty during Operations Iraqi Freedom II and III.
  • Elaborate on the primary geographical difference between FOB Danger and the Forward Operating Bases located in East Baghdad.: FOB Danger was situated in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, whereas other Forward Operating Bases such as Iron Horse, Patriot, and Loyalty were located in East Baghdad.

When did the 3rd Infantry Division arrive at the East Baghdad Forward Operating Base Iron Horse?

Answer: December/January 2005

The 3rd Infantry Division arrived at the East Baghdad FOB Iron Horse in December 2004/January 2005.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the involvement of the 1st Cavalry Division's 1st Brigade and the 3rd Infantry Division with the Forward Operating Bases discussed.: The 1st Brigade of the 1st Cavalry Division commenced operations at FOB Iron Horse in East Baghdad, where the 3rd Infantry Division subsequently arrived in December 2004/January 2005.

Which of the following served as a subsequent designation for the Forward Operating Base Ironhorse situated in East Baghdad?

Answer: Forward Operating Base Patriot

The Forward Operating Base Ironhorse in East Baghdad was renamed FOB Patriot and then subsequently FOB Loyalty.

Related Concepts:

  • List the subsequent designations of the Forward Operating Base Ironhorse located in East Baghdad.: The Forward Operating Base Ironhorse in East Baghdad was later redesignated as FOB Patriot and subsequently as FOB Loyalty during Operations Iraqi Freedom II and III.

Which of the following was NOT a designation for the East Baghdad Forward Operating Base that originated as Iron Horse?

Answer: FOB Danger

The East Baghdad FOB Iron Horse was renamed FOB Patriot and then FOB Loyalty. FOB Danger was a separate installation in Tikrit.

Related Concepts:

  • Distinguish the geographical locations of Forward Operating Base Danger and the Forward Operating Base Ironhorse mentioned in the context of East Baghdad.: Forward Operating Base Danger was situated in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, whereas the other Forward Operating Base Ironhorse was located in East Baghdad and included a prison facility.
  • List the subsequent designations of the Forward Operating Base Ironhorse located in East Baghdad.: The Forward Operating Base Ironhorse in East Baghdad was later redesignated as FOB Patriot and subsequently as FOB Loyalty during Operations Iraqi Freedom II and III.
  • Elaborate on the primary geographical difference between FOB Danger and the Forward Operating Bases located in East Baghdad.: FOB Danger was situated in Tikrit, Northern Iraq, whereas other Forward Operating Bases such as Iron Horse, Patriot, and Loyalty were located in East Baghdad.

V. Transition and Deactivation

Forward Operating Base Danger was transferred to the government of Iraq in February 2005.

Answer: False

Forward Operating Base Danger was handed over to the government of Iraq in November 2005, not February 2005.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide the date of the official handover of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government.: Forward Operating Base Danger was formally transferred to the government of Iraq in November 2005.
  • Explain the implications of the handover of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government.: The transfer of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government in November 2005 signified the cessation of its operation by the United States Army and a formal transition of control.

The transfer of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government coincided with the conclusion of the 42nd Infantry Division's tenure.

Answer: True

The 42nd Infantry Division's tenure ended in November 2005, which is also when FOB Danger was handed over to the Iraqi government.

Related Concepts:

  • State the duration of the 42nd Infantry Division's garrison at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 42nd Infantry Division served as the garrison force for Forward Operating Base Danger from February to November 2005.
  • Specify the operational duration of the 42nd Infantry Division's deployment at Forward Operating Base Danger.: The 42nd Infantry Division maintained its presence at Forward Operating Base Danger for the period spanning February to November 2005.
  • Explain the implications of the handover of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government.: The transfer of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government in November 2005 signified the cessation of its operation by the United States Army and a formal transition of control.
  • Provide the date of the official handover of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government.: Forward Operating Base Danger was formally transferred to the government of Iraq in November 2005.

The transfer of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government marked the commencement of its operation by the United States Army.

Answer: False

The handover of FOB Danger to the Iraqi government in November 2005 marked the *end* of its operation by the United States Army, not the beginning.

Related Concepts:

  • Explain the implications of the handover of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government.: The transfer of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government in November 2005 signified the cessation of its operation by the United States Army and a formal transition of control.
  • Provide the date of the official handover of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government.: Forward Operating Base Danger was formally transferred to the government of Iraq in November 2005.

In which month and year did the transfer of Forward Operating Base Danger to the government of Iraq take place?

Answer: November 2005

Forward Operating Base Danger was handed over to the government of Iraq in November 2005.

Related Concepts:

  • Provide the date of the official handover of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government.: Forward Operating Base Danger was formally transferred to the government of Iraq in November 2005.
  • Explain the implications of the handover of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government.: The transfer of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government in November 2005 signified the cessation of its operation by the United States Army and a formal transition of control.

The transfer of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government in November 2005 signified what important event?

Answer: The end of its operation by the United States Army.

The handover of Forward Operating Base Danger to the government of Iraq in November 2005 marked the end of its operation by the United States Army.

Related Concepts:

  • Explain the implications of the handover of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government.: The transfer of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government in November 2005 signified the cessation of its operation by the United States Army and a formal transition of control.
  • Provide the date of the official handover of Forward Operating Base Danger to the Iraqi government.: Forward Operating Base Danger was formally transferred to the government of Iraq in November 2005.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy