Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 6
Hugh Reily was born in County Dublin, Ireland, around the year 1630.
Answer: False
The biographical record indicates Hugh Reily was born in County Cavan, Ireland, circa 1630, rendering the statement that he was born in County Dublin incorrect.
Hugh Reily's Irish name was Aodh O'Raghallaigh, reflecting his descent from the Lords of East Breifne.
Answer: True
The Gaelic Irish appellation for Hugh Reily was Aodh O'Raghallaigh, which denotes his ancestral connection to the historical Lords of East Breifne.
Hugh Reily's lineage as Chiefs of the O'Reilly clan signifies a background of significant historical leadership in Ireland.
Answer: True
The designation of Hugh Reily's ancestors as Chiefs of the O'Reilly clan indicates a heritage rooted in significant historical leadership and prominence within the Irish social and political structure.
The Dictionary of National Biography is cited as the primary source for Hugh Reily's biographical information.
Answer: True
The Dictionary of National Biography serves as a key reference work for the biographical information pertaining to Hugh Reily.
Based on the provided information, what was Hugh Reily's primary identity and role?
Answer: A Member of Parliament for Cavan Borough and a political author.
Hugh Reily is identified primarily as a Member of Parliament for Cavan Borough and a notable political author, reflecting his dual engagement in governance and public discourse.
What is Hugh Reily's Gaelic Irish name?
Answer: Aodh O'Raghallaigh
Hugh Reily's Gaelic Irish name was Aodh O'Raghallaigh.
What historical titles were held by Hugh Reily's ancestors?
Answer: Lords of East Breifne and Chiefs of the O'Reilly clan
Hugh Reily's ancestors held the historical titles of Lords of East Breifne and Chiefs of the O'Reilly clan.
What was the nature of Hugh Reily's familial connection to John Charles McQuaid?
Answer: The connection was distant, through an ancestor of McQuaid.
Hugh Reily's familial connection to John Charles McQuaid was distant, established through an ancestor of McQuaid named John O'Reilly of Caulfield.
What does Hugh Reily's lineage as 'Chiefs of the O'Reilly clan' signify regarding his background?
Answer: His family held significant historical leadership and status in Ireland.
Hugh Reily's lineage as 'Chiefs of the O'Reilly clan' signifies that his family held a position of significant historical leadership and status within Ireland.
Hugh Reily served as the primary legal counsel for Oliver Plunkett throughout his entire trial in 1681.
Answer: False
While Hugh Reily served as a legal advisor to Oliver Plunkett during his 1681 trial, the source indicates he assumed this role after the initial counsel, Sir Nicholas Plunkett, had passed away, rather than throughout the entire duration.
Oliver Plunkett acknowledged that Hugh Reily faced significant personal risks in providing him defense.
Answer: True
Oliver Plunkett recognized the substantial personal risks undertaken by Hugh Reily in providing his defense, reportedly remarking on the dangers involved.
Hugh Reily was appointed Master in Chancery on May 22, 1686.
Answer: True
The record confirms Hugh Reily's appointment to the judicial office of Master in Chancery occurred on May 22, 1686.
Approximately when did Hugh Reily qualify as a barrister?
Answer: Around 1650
Hugh Reily qualified as a barrister approximately in the year 1650.
What significant risk did Hugh Reily undertake in his legal involvement with Oliver Plunkett?
Answer: He served as Plunkett's legal advisor during his trial.
Hugh Reily undertook the significant risk of serving as Oliver Plunkett's legal advisor during his trial, a role that carried considerable personal danger.
In which year was Hugh Reily appointed Master in Chancery?
Answer: 1686
Hugh Reily was appointed Master in Chancery in the year 1686.
What was the nature of Hugh Reily's legal involvement with Oliver Plunkett?
Answer: He served as Plunkett's defense counsel, taking significant risks.
Hugh Reily's legal involvement with Oliver Plunkett was as his defense counsel, a role he undertook despite significant personal risks.
Hugh Reily represented the constituency of County Cavan in the Patriot Parliament of 1689.
Answer: False
Hugh Reily served as a Member of Parliament for Cavan Borough within the Patriot Parliament convened in 1689, rather than representing the broader County Cavan constituency.
In 1689, Hugh Reily also held the position of Clerk of the Privy Council within the Irish Jacobite Government.
Answer: True
Concurrently with his parliamentary duties, Hugh Reily held the significant administrative post of Clerk of the Privy Council in the Irish Jacobite Government during 1689.
The Patriot Parliament of 1689 was convened by King William III to solidify his rule in Ireland.
Answer: False
The Patriot Parliament of 1689 was convened under the authority of King James II as part of his efforts to assert his rule in Ireland, not by King William III.
Hugh Reily held a seat in Parliament representing which specific constituency?
Answer: Cavan Borough
Hugh Reily held a seat in Parliament representing the constituency of Cavan Borough.
In which specific parliament did Hugh Reily serve during the year 1689?
Answer: The Patriot Parliament
During 1689, Hugh Reily served as a Member of Parliament in the Patriot Parliament.
In addition to his role as an M.P., what other governmental position did Hugh Reily hold in 1689?
Answer: Clerk of the Privy Council
In 1689, Hugh Reily also held the governmental position of Clerk of the Privy Council within the Irish Jacobite administration.
What was the historical context surrounding the convening of the Patriot Parliament of 1689?
Answer: A body convened by King James II during his attempt to regain the English throne from Ireland.
The Patriot Parliament of 1689 convened under King James II during his efforts to reclaim the English throne, operating within the context of Jacobite efforts in Ireland.
Hugh Reily published his political work, 'Ireland's Case briefly stated,' in 1685.
Answer: False
Hugh Reily's seminal political work, 'Ireland's Case briefly stated,' was first published in 1695, with a subsequent edition appearing in 1720.
The book 'Ireland's Case briefly stated' focused primarily on the political events of the 18th century.
Answer: False
Contrary to focusing on the 18th century, 'Ireland's Case briefly stated' primarily addressed historical events and grievances spanning from the reign of Queen Elizabeth I through that of King James II.
In his book, Hugh Reily criticized the neglect faced by Irish Roman Catholics during the reign of King Charles II.
Answer: True
Hugh Reily's work, 'Ireland's Case briefly stated,' included specific critiques concerning the lack of attention or support afforded to Irish Roman Catholics during the period of King Charles II's rule.
Hugh Reily's book, 'Ireland's Case briefly stated,' contained highly detailed factual accounts and specific dates.
Answer: False
The style of 'Ireland's Case briefly stated' is typically described as presenting broad arguments and grievances, rather than offering meticulously detailed factual accounts or precise chronological data.
The final speech of Oliver Plunkett was included within Hugh Reily's 'Ireland's Case briefly stated'.
Answer: True
Hugh Reily's inclusion of Oliver Plunkett's final speech within 'Ireland's Case briefly stated' added a poignant and historically significant element to his narrative.
King James II reportedly praised Hugh Reily's book and encouraged its wide distribution.
Answer: False
Historical accounts suggest that King James II did not endorse Hugh Reily's book; instead, he is reported to have been displeased by its critical tone.
Walter Harris, in Ware's Works, reported that James II withdrew Reilly's salary due to displeasure with his book.
Answer: True
Walter Harris, in his compilation Ware's Works, documented that King James II's displeasure with Reilly's book led to the withdrawal of Reilly's salary.
An alternative account suggests James II did not read Reily's book before its publication.
Answer: False
An alternative historical account posits that Hugh Reily presented his manuscript to King James II for review prior to its publication, indicating the King was aware of its contents beforehand.
The central argument of 'Ireland's Case briefly stated' was to advocate for the restoration of Catholic monastic orders.
Answer: False
The primary thesis of 'Ireland's Case briefly stated' centered on detailing the historical grievances and neglect experienced by Irish Roman Catholics, rather than advocating for the restoration of monastic orders.
In what year was Hugh Reily's significant political work, 'Ireland's Case briefly stated,' published?
Answer: 1695
Hugh Reily's significant political work, 'Ireland's Case briefly stated,' was published in the year 1695.
Which historical period does 'Ireland's Case briefly stated' primarily cover?
Answer: From the reign of Elizabeth I through the reign of James II.
'Ireland's Case briefly stated' primarily covers the historical period from the reign of Queen Elizabeth I through the reign of King James II.
What specific criticism did Hugh Reily include in his book concerning the reign of King Charles II?
Answer: Neglect and lack of support for Irish Roman Catholics.
Hugh Reily's book included criticism regarding the neglect and lack of support afforded to Irish Roman Catholics during the reign of King Charles II.
How is the general style and content of 'Ireland's Case briefly stated' typically described?
Answer: Broad in nature, with fewer specific details.
The style of 'Ireland's Case briefly stated' is generally characterized as broad in scope, presenting fewer specific details and dates in favor of outlining overarching arguments.
What significant historical document did Hugh Reily include in his book?
Answer: The final speech of Oliver Plunkett
Hugh Reily included the final speech of Oliver Plunkett within his book, 'Ireland's Case briefly stated'.
According to historical accounts, what was King James II's initial reaction to 'Ireland's Case briefly stated'?
Answer: He was offended by its tone and content.
Historical accounts suggest that King James II reacted negatively, being offended by the tone and content of 'Ireland's Case briefly stated'.
What did Walter Harris report concerning James II's actions subsequent to reading Reilly's book?
Answer: James II dismissed Reilly and withdrew his salary.
Walter Harris reported that James II, displeased with Reilly's book, dismissed him and withdrew his salary.
Why did 'Ireland's Case briefly stated' achieve popularity among the Irish populace?
Answer: It provided a rare, accessible argument supporting the Catholic perspective.
'Ireland's Case briefly stated' gained popularity because it offered a rare and accessible argument supporting the Catholic perspective, serving as a key text for the Irish populace.
What was the central argument presented in Hugh Reily's 'Ireland's Case briefly stated'?
Answer: To chronicle the historical grievances and neglect suffered by Roman Catholics in Ireland.
The central argument of 'Ireland's Case briefly stated' was to chronicle the historical grievances and neglect experienced by Roman Catholics in Ireland.
What was the likely purpose behind the publication of 'Ireland's Case briefly stated' in 1695?
Answer: To provide a historical account supporting the Catholic perspective and grievances.
The likely purpose of publishing 'Ireland's Case briefly stated' in 1695 was to present a historical account that supported the Catholic perspective and articulated their grievances.
Following the defeat of King James II, Hugh Reily remained in Ireland and continued his legal practice.
Answer: False
Contrary to remaining in Ireland, Hugh Reily departed for exile in France subsequent to the deposition of King James II.
James II appointed Hugh Reily as the actual, functioning Lord Chancellor of Ireland in 1690 while in exile.
Answer: False
The appointment of Hugh Reily as Lord Chancellor by the exiled James II in 1690 was purely titular, meaning it lacked any actual authority or functional capacity.
Hugh Reily was attainted by King William III's government in 1691, leading to the confiscation of his lands.
Answer: True
The legal process of attainder initiated against Hugh Reily in 1691 by King William III's administration led directly to the forfeiture of his estates.
The loss of his titular position significantly boosted Hugh Reily's spirits, and he lived for many more years.
Answer: False
The deprivation of his titular office as Lord Chancellor reportedly caused Hugh Reily considerable distress, contributing to his demise not long after.
Hugh Reily is generally believed to have died in the year 1695.
Answer: True
The prevailing historical consensus places Hugh Reily's death in the year 1695.
Hugh Reily's appointment as Lord Chancellor by the exiled James II carried significant real power.
Answer: False
The appointment of Hugh Reily as Lord Chancellor by the exiled James II in 1690 was a titular role, devoid of actual executive or judicial authority.
Being 'attainted' in 17th century Ireland meant losing property and civil rights, often due to treason.
Answer: True
The legal status of being 'attainted' during the 17th century in Ireland entailed the forfeiture of property and civil rights, commonly resulting from accusations or convictions of treason.
What was Hugh Reily's course of action following the defeat of King James II?
Answer: He went into exile in France.
Following the defeat of King James II, Hugh Reily did not remain in Ireland but instead went into exile in France.
What was the nature of the Lord Chancellor position granted to Hugh Reily by the exiled James II?
Answer: A purely titular position, held in name only.
The Lord Chancellor position granted to Hugh Reily by the exiled James II in 1690 was purely titular, meaning it held no actual power or functional authority.
What legal process was initiated against Hugh Reily by King William III's government in 1691?
Answer: Attainder
In 1691, King William III's government initiated the legal process of attainder against Hugh Reily.
What was the direct consequence of Hugh Reily's attainder in 1691?
Answer: His landholdings in County Cavan were confiscated.
A direct consequence of Hugh Reily's attainder in 1691 was the confiscation of his landholdings located in County Cavan.
What is the suggested cause of Hugh Reily's death, estimated to be around 1694?
Answer: Deep distress following the loss of his titular position.
It is suggested that Hugh Reily's death around 1694 was precipitated by deep distress resulting from the loss of his titular position as Lord Chancellor.
The 1754 publication 'The Impartial History of Ireland' was an unrelated work, not a reprint of Reilly's book.
Answer: False
The publication titled 'The Impartial History of Ireland' in 1754 is recognized as a reprint of Hugh Reily's earlier work, 'Ireland's Case'.
Edmund Burke's speech from the Bristol election of 1780 was included in the 1837 edition of Reilly's work.
Answer: False
Edmund Burke's speech from the Bristol election of 1780 was incorporated into the 1787 edition of Reilly's work, while Daniel O'Connell's memoir was featured in the 1837 edition.
Which of the following publications is identified as a reprint of Hugh Reily's 'Ireland's Case'?
Answer: The Impartial History of Ireland (1754)
The publication 'The Impartial History of Ireland' in 1754 is recognized as a reprint of Hugh Reily's earlier work, 'Ireland's Case'.
Which political figure's speech was included in the 1787 edition of Hugh Reily's work?
Answer: Edmund Burke
Edmund Burke's speech from the Bristol election of 1780 was included in the 1787 edition of Hugh Reily's work.
What does the 'failed verification' tag associated with a citation suggest?
Answer: The cited source contains inaccuracies or could not confirm the data.
A 'failed verification' tag on a citation indicates that the associated information could not be confirmed by the cited source, or that the source itself presented inaccuracies.
How did the inclusion of speeches by figures such as Edmund Burke influence the legacy of Hugh Reily's work?
Answer: It linked Reilly's historical account to later movements for Irish rights.
The inclusion of speeches by prominent figures like Edmund Burke helped to link Hugh Reily's historical account to subsequent movements advocating for Irish rights, thereby extending its legacy.