Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



Jesus' Predictions of His Death in the Gospels

At a Glance

Title: Jesus' Predictions of His Death in the Gospels

Total Categories: 4

Category Stats

  • Synoptic Gospel Accounts of Jesus' Predictions: 17 flashcards, 21 questions
  • John's Gospel: Symbolic Language and Predictions: 6 flashcards, 8 questions
  • Disciples' Comprehension and Reactions to Predictions: 7 flashcards, 11 questions
  • Scholarly Analysis and Historical Context: 14 flashcards, 18 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 44
  • True/False Questions: 29
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 29
  • Total Questions: 58

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Jesus' Predictions of His Death in the Gospels

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Jesus predicts his death" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Jesus' Predictions of His Death in the Gospels

Study Guide: Jesus' Predictions of His Death in the Gospels

Synoptic Gospel Accounts of Jesus' Predictions

The Synoptic Gospels, comprising Matthew, Mark, and Luke, collectively present accounts of Jesus predicting his own death.

Answer: True

The Synoptic Gospels, comprising Matthew, Mark, and Luke, collectively present accounts of Jesus predicting his own death.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the Synoptic Gospels, and what do they collectively describe concerning Jesus?: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) document multiple instances of Jesus foretelling his own demise. The narrative structure often shows an escalation, with initial predictions leading to a more detailed final foretelling of his crucifixion.
  • What common element is consistently present in the predictions of Jesus' death across the Synoptic Gospels?: A recurring element within the Synoptic Gospels is Jesus' foretelling of his own death and subsequent resurrection on the third day.
  • What is the estimated timeframe for the writing of the Gospel of Mark, and why is it considered significant in this context?: Scholarly consensus posits that the Gospel of Mark is the earliest Gospel, with an estimated writing date around 70 AD, rendering its accounts of Jesus' predictions crucial for understanding early Christian traditions.

Mark's Gospel records Jesus predicting his death three times.

Answer: True

The Gospel of Mark records Jesus predicting his own death on three distinct occasions.

Related Concepts:

  • How many times does the Gospel of Mark record Jesus predicting his own death?: The Gospel of Mark documents Jesus predicting his death on three occasions, specifically located in Mark 8:31-33, 9:30-32, and 10:32-34.
  • What are the Synoptic Gospels, and what do they collectively describe concerning Jesus?: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) document multiple instances of Jesus foretelling his own demise. The narrative structure often shows an escalation, with initial predictions leading to a more detailed final foretelling of his crucifixion.
  • What is the primary focus of the article "Jesus predicts his death"?: The central objective of the article is to meticulously detail the occurrences within the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) where Jesus foretold his own death, encompassing contextual details, precise wording, and scholarly analyses.

The first prediction of Jesus' death in Mark's Gospel occurs near Caesarea Philippi.

Answer: True

The initial prediction of Jesus' impending death in the Gospel of Mark is situated geographically near Caesarea Philippi.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the location, Caesarea Philippi, in relation to Jesus' first prediction of his death in Mark's Gospel?: The placement of the first prediction in Mark's Gospel near Caesarea Philippi, directly after Peter's confession of Jesus as the Messiah, implies a thematic link between Jesus' messianic identity and his foretold suffering.
  • Describe the context and content of the first prediction of Jesus' death in the Gospel of Mark.: The initial prediction of Jesus' suffering and death occurs near Caesarea Philippi, following Peter's confession. Jesus informed his disciples that the 'Son of Man' would endure suffering, rejection by religious authorities (elders, chief priests, teachers of the law), death, and resurrection on the third day.

Matthew's Gospel adds a prediction of Jesus being crucified before his entry into Jerusalem.

Answer: True

The Gospel of Matthew includes an additional prediction concerning Jesus' crucifixion prior to his arrival in Jerusalem.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific event does Matthew's Gospel add regarding Jesus' predictions before entering Jerusalem?: The Gospel of Matthew incorporates an additional prediction, placed before Jesus' entry into Jerusalem, which foretells his crucifixion at that location.
  • What does the article suggest about the timing of Jesus' predictions of his death relative to his entry into Jerusalem?: The article observes that the Gospel of Matthew contains a prediction of crucifixion occurring prior to Jesus' arrival in Jerusalem, suggesting that certain foretellings transpired as Jesus neared the city for his final Passover observance.
  • What are the Synoptic Gospels, and what do they collectively describe concerning Jesus?: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) document multiple instances of Jesus foretelling his own demise. The narrative structure often shows an escalation, with initial predictions leading to a more detailed final foretelling of his crucifixion.

Luke's Gospel tends to provide shorter accounts of Jesus' death predictions compared to Mark.

Answer: True

Compared to the Gospel of Mark, Luke's Gospel generally presents more concise accounts of Jesus' predictions regarding his death.

Related Concepts:

  • In what ways does Luke's account of Jesus' predictions differ from Matthew's and Mark's?: Luke's Gospel characteristically abbreviates the accounts of Jesus' predictions. For example, Luke 9:22 omits the dialogue between Jesus and Peter in the first prediction, and Luke 9:43-45 states that the disciples failed to comprehend the second prediction and were hesitant to inquire.
  • What are the Synoptic Gospels, and what do they collectively describe concerning Jesus?: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) document multiple instances of Jesus foretelling his own demise. The narrative structure often shows an escalation, with initial predictions leading to a more detailed final foretelling of his crucifixion.
  • What is the significance of the comparison table in the article regarding Jesus' predictions?: The comparative table offers a structured analysis of Jesus' predictions of death and resurrection as documented in Matthew, Mark, and Luke, emphasizing variations in the details of suffering and the disciples' responses.

Matthew's third prediction mentions Jesus being delivered to the Gentiles, mocked, flogged, and crucified.

Answer: True

The third prediction recorded in Matthew's Gospel details that Jesus would be delivered to the Gentiles, subjected to mockery and flogging, and ultimately crucified.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific details about the manner of Jesus' death are mentioned in the third prediction as recorded in Matthew, Mark, and Luke?: The third prediction, present in Matthew 20:17-19, Mark 10:32-34, and Luke 18:31-34, consistently details Jesus' delivery to the Gentiles, mockery, insult, spitting, scourging, and death, with Matthew specifically mentioning crucifixion.
  • What specific details about the manner of Jesus' death are mentioned in the third prediction recorded in Matthew, Mark, and Luke?: The third prediction, present in Matthew 20:17-19, Mark 10:32-34, and Luke 18:31-34, consistently details Jesus' delivery to the Gentiles, mockery, insult, spitting, scourging, and death, with Matthew specifically mentioning crucifixion.
  • What specific event does Matthew's Gospel add regarding Jesus' predictions before entering Jerusalem?: The Gospel of Matthew incorporates an additional prediction, placed before Jesus' entry into Jerusalem, which foretells his crucifixion at that location.

The Gospel of Mark is generally considered by scholars to be the earliest Gospel written.

Answer: True

Scholarly consensus generally regards the Gospel of Mark as the earliest written Gospel.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the estimated timeframe for the writing of the Gospel of Mark, and why is it considered significant in this context?: Scholarly consensus posits that the Gospel of Mark is the earliest Gospel, with an estimated writing date around 70 AD, rendering its accounts of Jesus' predictions crucial for understanding early Christian traditions.
  • What is the significance of the location, Caesarea Philippi, in relation to Jesus' first prediction of his death in Mark's Gospel?: The placement of the first prediction in Mark's Gospel near Caesarea Philippi, directly after Peter's confession of Jesus as the Messiah, implies a thematic link between Jesus' messianic identity and his foretold suffering.

Matthew 26:1-2 places a prediction of Jesus' crucifixion shortly before the Passover feast.

Answer: True

The Gospel of Matthew, in chapter 26, verses 1-2, situates a prediction of Jesus' crucifixion shortly preceding the Passover feast.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the fourth prediction in Matthew 26:1-2 concerning the timing and context of Jesus' impending crucifixion?: Matthew 26:1-2 situates a prediction of Jesus' impending crucifixion immediately prior to the plotting by religious leaders, noting, 'As you know, the Passover is two days away — and the Son of Man will be handed over to be crucified.'
  • What does the article suggest about the timing of Jesus' predictions of his death relative to his entry into Jerusalem?: The article observes that the Gospel of Matthew contains a prediction of crucifixion occurring prior to Jesus' arrival in Jerusalem, suggesting that certain foretellings transpired as Jesus neared the city for his final Passover observance.
  • What specific event does Matthew's Gospel add regarding Jesus' predictions before entering Jerusalem?: The Gospel of Matthew incorporates an additional prediction, placed before Jesus' entry into Jerusalem, which foretells his crucifixion at that location.

The first prediction in Mark's Gospel occurs after Peter's confession of Jesus as the Messiah.

Answer: True

In the Gospel of Mark, the first prediction of Jesus' death transpires subsequent to Peter's confession of Jesus as the Messiah.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the location, Caesarea Philippi, in relation to Jesus' first prediction of his death in Mark's Gospel?: The placement of the first prediction in Mark's Gospel near Caesarea Philippi, directly after Peter's confession of Jesus as the Messiah, implies a thematic link between Jesus' messianic identity and his foretold suffering.
  • Describe the context and content of the first prediction of Jesus' death in the Gospel of Mark.: The initial prediction of Jesus' suffering and death occurs near Caesarea Philippi, following Peter's confession. Jesus informed his disciples that the 'Son of Man' would endure suffering, rejection by religious authorities (elders, chief priests, teachers of the law), death, and resurrection on the third day.
  • What is the estimated timeframe for the writing of the Gospel of Mark, and why is it considered significant in this context?: Scholarly consensus posits that the Gospel of Mark is the earliest Gospel, with an estimated writing date around 70 AD, rendering its accounts of Jesus' predictions crucial for understanding early Christian traditions.

The phrase "Son of Man must suffer many things" is found in the third prediction recorded in Mark's Gospel.

Answer: False

The phrase 'Son of Man must suffer many things' is notably present in the first prediction recorded in Mark's Gospel, not the third.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific phrase does Jesus use in Mark 8:31-33 to describe the suffering the Son of Man must endure?: Mark 8:31-33 records Jesus stating that the 'Son of Man' is destined to 'suffer many things and be rejected by the elders, chief priests and teachers of the law, and that he must be killed and after three days rise again.'
  • Describe the context and content of the first prediction of Jesus' death in the Gospel of Mark.: The initial prediction of Jesus' suffering and death occurs near Caesarea Philippi, following Peter's confession. Jesus informed his disciples that the 'Son of Man' would endure suffering, rejection by religious authorities (elders, chief priests, teachers of the law), death, and resurrection on the third day.
  • What specific details about the manner of Jesus' death are mentioned in the third prediction recorded in Matthew, Mark, and Luke?: The third prediction, present in Matthew 20:17-19, Mark 10:32-34, and Luke 18:31-34, consistently details Jesus' delivery to the Gentiles, mockery, insult, spitting, scourging, and death, with Matthew specifically mentioning crucifixion.

The analogy of Moses lifting the serpent is used in Matthew's Gospel to explain Jesus' future suffering.

Answer: False

The analogy of Moses lifting the serpent in the wilderness is employed in the Gospel of John, not Matthew's Gospel, to elucidate Jesus' future suffering.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the relationship between Jesus' prediction of being "lifted up" in John's Gospel and the Old Testament serpent incident?: Jesus' declaration in the Gospel of John that the 'Son of Man must be lifted up' draws a direct parallel to the Old Testament narrative in Numbers 21:4-9, wherein Moses elevated a bronze serpent on a pole to effect healing for the Israelites. This analogy establishes a connection between Jesus' crucifixion and a mechanism for human salvation.
  • What Old Testament event is referenced by Jesus' statement about being "lifted up" in John's Gospel?: Jesus' statement alludes to the event recorded in Numbers 21:4-9, where Moses erected a bronze serpent on a pole in the wilderness to provide healing for the Israelites. This analogy serves to connect Jesus' impending death to a salvific act for humanity.
  • In John's Gospel, what analogy does Jesus use when speaking with Nicodemus about his future "lifting up"?: During his discourse with Nicodemus, Jesus employs the analogy of Moses lifting a snake in the wilderness to signify that the 'Son of Man' must also be lifted up.

According to the source, what is the estimated timeframe for the writing of the Gospel of Mark?

Answer: Around 70 AD

According to scholarly consensus referenced in the source, the Gospel of Mark is estimated to have been written around 70 AD.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the estimated timeframe for the writing of the Gospel of Mark, and why is it considered significant in this context?: Scholarly consensus posits that the Gospel of Mark is the earliest Gospel, with an estimated writing date around 70 AD, rendering its accounts of Jesus' predictions crucial for understanding early Christian traditions.

How many times does the Gospel of Mark record Jesus predicting his own death?

Answer: Three times

The Gospel of Mark records Jesus predicting his own death on three occasions.

Related Concepts:

  • How many times does the Gospel of Mark record Jesus predicting his own death?: The Gospel of Mark documents Jesus predicting his death on three occasions, specifically located in Mark 8:31-33, 9:30-32, and 10:32-34.
  • What are the Synoptic Gospels, and what do they collectively describe concerning Jesus?: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) document multiple instances of Jesus foretelling his own demise. The narrative structure often shows an escalation, with initial predictions leading to a more detailed final foretelling of his crucifixion.
  • What is the primary focus of the article "Jesus predicts his death"?: The central objective of the article is to meticulously detail the occurrences within the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) where Jesus foretold his own death, encompassing contextual details, precise wording, and scholarly analyses.

In the first prediction near Caesarea Philippi, who did Jesus say the "Son of Man" must be rejected by?

Answer: The elders, chief priests, and teachers of the law

During the first prediction near Caesarea Philippi, Jesus stated that the 'Son of Man' must be rejected by the elders, chief priests, and teachers of the law.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the context and content of the first prediction of Jesus' death in the Gospel of Mark.: The initial prediction of Jesus' suffering and death occurs near Caesarea Philippi, following Peter's confession. Jesus informed his disciples that the 'Son of Man' would endure suffering, rejection by religious authorities (elders, chief priests, teachers of the law), death, and resurrection on the third day.

Which Gospel specifically adds a prediction of Jesus being crucified before his entry into Jerusalem?

Answer: Matthew

The Gospel of Matthew specifically includes a prediction that Jesus would be crucified prior to his entry into Jerusalem.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific event does Matthew's Gospel add regarding Jesus' predictions before entering Jerusalem?: The Gospel of Matthew incorporates an additional prediction, placed before Jesus' entry into Jerusalem, which foretells his crucifixion at that location.
  • What does the article suggest about the timing of Jesus' predictions of his death relative to his entry into Jerusalem?: The article observes that the Gospel of Matthew contains a prediction of crucifixion occurring prior to Jesus' arrival in Jerusalem, suggesting that certain foretellings transpired as Jesus neared the city for his final Passover observance.
  • What are the Synoptic Gospels, and what do they collectively describe concerning Jesus?: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) document multiple instances of Jesus foretelling his own demise. The narrative structure often shows an escalation, with initial predictions leading to a more detailed final foretelling of his crucifixion.

How does Luke's account of Jesus' predictions generally compare to Matthew's and Mark's?

Answer: Luke's accounts tend to be shorter.

Luke's Gospel generally presents shorter accounts of Jesus' predictions compared to those found in Matthew and Mark.

Related Concepts:

  • In what ways does Luke's account of Jesus' predictions differ from Matthew's and Mark's?: Luke's Gospel characteristically abbreviates the accounts of Jesus' predictions. For example, Luke 9:22 omits the dialogue between Jesus and Peter in the first prediction, and Luke 9:43-45 states that the disciples failed to comprehend the second prediction and were hesitant to inquire.
  • What is the significance of the comparison table in the article regarding Jesus' predictions?: The comparative table offers a structured analysis of Jesus' predictions of death and resurrection as documented in Matthew, Mark, and Luke, emphasizing variations in the details of suffering and the disciples' responses.

Which Gospel explicitly mentions Jesus predicting he would be delivered to the Gentiles, mocked, flogged, and crucified?

Answer: Matthew

The Gospel of Matthew explicitly details Jesus predicting his delivery to the Gentiles, followed by mockery, flogging, and crucifixion.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific details about the manner of Jesus' death are mentioned in the third prediction as recorded in Matthew, Mark, and Luke?: The third prediction, present in Matthew 20:17-19, Mark 10:32-34, and Luke 18:31-34, consistently details Jesus' delivery to the Gentiles, mockery, insult, spitting, scourging, and death, with Matthew specifically mentioning crucifixion.
  • What specific details about the manner of Jesus' death are mentioned in the third prediction recorded in Matthew, Mark, and Luke?: The third prediction, present in Matthew 20:17-19, Mark 10:32-34, and Luke 18:31-34, consistently details Jesus' delivery to the Gentiles, mockery, insult, spitting, scourging, and death, with Matthew specifically mentioning crucifixion.
  • What specific event does Matthew's Gospel add regarding Jesus' predictions before entering Jerusalem?: The Gospel of Matthew incorporates an additional prediction, placed before Jesus' entry into Jerusalem, which foretells his crucifixion at that location.

What is the significance of Matthew 26:1-2 in the context of Jesus' predictions?

Answer: It places a prediction of Jesus' crucifixion shortly before the Passover feast.

Matthew 26:1-2 is significant as it places a prediction of Jesus' crucifixion shortly before the Passover feast.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the fourth prediction in Matthew 26:1-2 concerning the timing and context of Jesus' impending crucifixion?: Matthew 26:1-2 situates a prediction of Jesus' impending crucifixion immediately prior to the plotting by religious leaders, noting, 'As you know, the Passover is two days away — and the Son of Man will be handed over to be crucified.'
  • What does the article suggest about the timing of Jesus' predictions of his death relative to his entry into Jerusalem?: The article observes that the Gospel of Matthew contains a prediction of crucifixion occurring prior to Jesus' arrival in Jerusalem, suggesting that certain foretellings transpired as Jesus neared the city for his final Passover observance.
  • What specific event does Matthew's Gospel add regarding Jesus' predictions before entering Jerusalem?: The Gospel of Matthew incorporates an additional prediction, placed before Jesus' entry into Jerusalem, which foretells his crucifixion at that location.

What common element is consistently present in the predictions of Jesus' death across the Synoptic Gospels?

Answer: Jesus foretelling his own death and resurrection after three days.

A recurring element within the Synoptic Gospels is Jesus' foretelling of his own death and subsequent resurrection on the third day.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the Synoptic Gospels, and what do they collectively describe concerning Jesus?: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) document multiple instances of Jesus foretelling his own demise. The narrative structure often shows an escalation, with initial predictions leading to a more detailed final foretelling of his crucifixion.
  • What common element is consistently present in the predictions of Jesus' death across the Synoptic Gospels?: A recurring element within the Synoptic Gospels is Jesus' foretelling of his own death and subsequent resurrection on the third day.
  • What is the primary focus of the article "Jesus predicts his death"?: The central objective of the article is to meticulously detail the occurrences within the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) where Jesus foretold his own death, encompassing contextual details, precise wording, and scholarly analyses.

The prediction that the Son of Man would be killed and rise again after three days is found in which Gospels?

Answer: Matthew, Mark, and Luke

The prediction that the Son of Man would be killed and rise again after three days is found in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the context and content of the first prediction of Jesus' death in the Gospel of Mark.: The initial prediction of Jesus' suffering and death occurs near Caesarea Philippi, following Peter's confession. Jesus informed his disciples that the 'Son of Man' would endure suffering, rejection by religious authorities (elders, chief priests, teachers of the law), death, and resurrection on the third day.
  • What common element is consistently present in the predictions of Jesus' death across the Synoptic Gospels?: A recurring element within the Synoptic Gospels is Jesus' foretelling of his own death and subsequent resurrection on the third day.
  • What are the Synoptic Gospels, and what do they collectively describe concerning Jesus?: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) document multiple instances of Jesus foretelling his own demise. The narrative structure often shows an escalation, with initial predictions leading to a more detailed final foretelling of his crucifixion.

According to Matthew 20:17-19, what specific actions would happen to Jesus before he was killed?

Answer: He would be delivered to the Gentiles, mocked, flogged, and crucified.

According to Matthew 20:17-19, before being killed, Jesus would be delivered to the Gentiles, mocked, flogged, and crucified.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific details about the manner of Jesus' death are mentioned in the third prediction as recorded in Matthew, Mark, and Luke?: The third prediction, present in Matthew 20:17-19, Mark 10:32-34, and Luke 18:31-34, consistently details Jesus' delivery to the Gentiles, mockery, insult, spitting, scourging, and death, with Matthew specifically mentioning crucifixion.
  • What specific details about the manner of Jesus' death are mentioned in the third prediction recorded in Matthew, Mark, and Luke?: The third prediction, present in Matthew 20:17-19, Mark 10:32-34, and Luke 18:31-34, consistently details Jesus' delivery to the Gentiles, mockery, insult, spitting, scourging, and death, with Matthew specifically mentioning crucifixion.
  • Summarize the key details of Jesus' first prediction of his death as recorded in Matthew 16:21-23.: Matthew 16:21-23 records Jesus initiating the disclosure to his disciples that he must proceed to Jerusalem, endure significant suffering from the elders, chief priests, and scribes, be killed, and be resurrected on the third day. This passage also encompasses Peter's objection and Jesus' retort.

John's Gospel: Symbolic Language and Predictions

In John's Gospel, Jesus uses the analogy of a grain of wheat dying to explain the necessity of his death for future fruitfulness.

Answer: True

Within the Gospel of John, Jesus employs the analogy of a grain of wheat dying to illustrate the necessity of his own death for the production of abundant spiritual fruit.

Related Concepts:

  • What analogy does Jesus use in John 12:23-24 to explain the necessity of his death for future fruitfulness?: Jesus employs the analogy of a grain of wheat, stating, 'Unless a grain of wheat falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it produces much grain,' to illustrate that his death is a prerequisite for abundant spiritual fruitfulness.

Jesus' prediction about being "lifted up" in John's Gospel references the Old Testament event of Moses lifting a bronze serpent.

Answer: True

In the Gospel of John, Jesus' reference to being 'lifted up' alludes to the Old Testament event where Moses elevated a bronze serpent in the wilderness.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the relationship between Jesus' prediction of being "lifted up" in John's Gospel and the Old Testament serpent incident?: Jesus' declaration in the Gospel of John that the 'Son of Man must be lifted up' draws a direct parallel to the Old Testament narrative in Numbers 21:4-9, wherein Moses elevated a bronze serpent on a pole to effect healing for the Israelites. This analogy establishes a connection between Jesus' crucifixion and a mechanism for human salvation.
  • In John's Gospel, what analogy does Jesus use when speaking with Nicodemus about his future "lifting up"?: During his discourse with Nicodemus, Jesus employs the analogy of Moses lifting a snake in the wilderness to signify that the 'Son of Man' must also be lifted up.
  • What Old Testament event is referenced by Jesus' statement about being "lifted up" in John's Gospel?: Jesus' statement alludes to the event recorded in Numbers 21:4-9, where Moses erected a bronze serpent on a pole in the wilderness to provide healing for the Israelites. This analogy serves to connect Jesus' impending death to a salvific act for humanity.

John's Gospel describes Jesus preparing his disciples for his departure using analogies like the grain of wheat.

Answer: True

The Gospel of John depicts Jesus preparing his disciples for his departure, employing analogies such as the grain of wheat to convey theological concepts.

Related Concepts:

  • What analogy does Jesus use in John 12:23-24 to explain the necessity of his death for future fruitfulness?: Jesus employs the analogy of a grain of wheat, stating, 'Unless a grain of wheat falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it produces much grain,' to illustrate that his death is a prerequisite for abundant spiritual fruitfulness.
  • How does the Gospel of John describe Jesus preparing his disciples for his departure in chapters 12-17?: Across chapters 12 through 17, the Gospel of John details instances where Jesus prepared his disciples for his departure, characterizing it as his 'glorification.'

Annas and Caiaphas are identified in John 18 as the scribes who tried Jesus.

Answer: False

In John 18, Annas and Caiaphas, identified as the chief priests, are mentioned in connection with the trial of Jesus, not as scribes.

Related Concepts:

  • Which specific Jewish leaders are identified in John 18 as having tried Jesus?: John 18 identifies Annas and Caiaphas, the two chief priests of the era, as the figures involved in the trial of Jesus.

In John's Gospel, what analogy does Jesus use to explain that his death is necessary for producing spiritual fruit?

Answer: A grain of wheat falling into the ground and dying

In the Gospel of John, Jesus utilizes the analogy of a grain of wheat falling into the ground and dying to explain the necessity of his death for generating abundant spiritual fruit.

Related Concepts:

  • What analogy does Jesus use in John 12:23-24 to explain the necessity of his death for future fruitfulness?: Jesus employs the analogy of a grain of wheat, stating, 'Unless a grain of wheat falls into the ground and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it produces much grain,' to illustrate that his death is a prerequisite for abundant spiritual fruitfulness.

In John's Gospel, what Old Testament event does Jesus reference with the analogy of being "lifted up"?

Answer: Moses lifting a bronze serpent in the wilderness

In the Gospel of John, Jesus references the Old Testament event of Moses lifting a bronze serpent in the wilderness when speaking about being 'lifted up'.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the relationship between Jesus' prediction of being "lifted up" in John's Gospel and the Old Testament serpent incident?: Jesus' declaration in the Gospel of John that the 'Son of Man must be lifted up' draws a direct parallel to the Old Testament narrative in Numbers 21:4-9, wherein Moses elevated a bronze serpent on a pole to effect healing for the Israelites. This analogy establishes a connection between Jesus' crucifixion and a mechanism for human salvation.
  • In John's Gospel, what analogy does Jesus use when speaking with Nicodemus about his future "lifting up"?: During his discourse with Nicodemus, Jesus employs the analogy of Moses lifting a snake in the wilderness to signify that the 'Son of Man' must also be lifted up.

According to John 18, which specific Jewish leaders tried Jesus?

Answer: Annas and Caiaphas, the two chief priests

John 18 identifies Annas and Caiaphas, the two chief priests of the era, as the figures involved in the trial of Jesus.

Related Concepts:

  • Which specific Jewish leaders are identified in John 18 as having tried Jesus?: John 18 identifies Annas and Caiaphas, the two chief priests of the era, as the figures involved in the trial of Jesus.

In John's Gospel, Jesus refers to his future departure as his what?

Answer: Glorification

In the Gospel of John, Jesus refers to his future departure as his 'glorification.'

Related Concepts:

  • How does the Gospel of John describe Jesus preparing his disciples for his departure in chapters 12-17?: Across chapters 12 through 17, the Gospel of John details instances where Jesus prepared his disciples for his departure, characterizing it as his 'glorification.'

Disciples' Comprehension and Reactions to Predictions

Peter objected to Jesus' first prediction of his death and was rebuked by Jesus.

Answer: True

Following Jesus' first prediction of his death, Peter voiced an objection and was subsequently rebuked by Jesus.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Peter react to Jesus' first prediction of his death, and what was Jesus' response?: Peter's objection to Jesus' prediction, expressed as 'Far be it from you, Lord; this shall not happen to you!', elicited a sharp rebuke from Jesus, who commanded, 'Get behind me, Satan! You do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men.'
  • What is the difference in the disciples' comprehension of Jesus' predictions between the first and third instances as presented in the table?: Although the disciples generally struggled to comprehend Jesus' predictions of his death, the comparative data indicates that following the initial prediction (Matthew 16, Mark 8), Peter's objection led to Jesus' rebuke. Post the third prediction (Matthew 20, Mark 10, Luke 18), the texts explicitly state their lack of understanding, with the meaning being concealed.
  • Summarize the key details of Jesus' first prediction of his death as recorded in Matthew 16:21-23.: Matthew 16:21-23 records Jesus initiating the disclosure to his disciples that he must proceed to Jerusalem, endure significant suffering from the elders, chief priests, and scribes, be killed, and be resurrected on the third day. This passage also encompasses Peter's objection and Jesus' retort.

After the second prediction of his death, the disciples in Matthew's Gospel were described as exceedingly sorrowful.

Answer: True

In Matthew's Gospel, following the second prediction of his death, the disciples are described as having been exceedingly sorrowful.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the table show about the disciples' reaction to the second prediction of Jesus' death in Matthew 17:22-23?: In the aftermath of the second prediction of his death, as recorded in Matthew 17:22-23, the disciples are described as having been 'exceedingly sorrowful.'
  • What is the difference in the disciples' comprehension of Jesus' predictions between the first and third instances as presented in the table?: Although the disciples generally struggled to comprehend Jesus' predictions of his death, the comparative data indicates that following the initial prediction (Matthew 16, Mark 8), Peter's objection led to Jesus' rebuke. Post the third prediction (Matthew 20, Mark 10, Luke 18), the texts explicitly state their lack of understanding, with the meaning being concealed.
  • What details are provided in the second prediction of Jesus' death as found in Matthew 17:22-23 and Mark 9:30-32?: Both Matthew (17:22-23) and Mark (9:30-32) report that the Son of Man would be betrayed, killed, and resurrected on the third day. Matthew highlights the disciples' sorrow, whereas Mark notes their lack of understanding and fear.

The disciples consistently understood Jesus' predictions about his death and resurrection throughout the Gospels.

Answer: False

The disciples did not consistently understand Jesus' predictions concerning his death and resurrection; rather, their comprehension was often limited or absent.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the difference in the disciples' comprehension of Jesus' predictions between the first and third instances as presented in the table?: Although the disciples generally struggled to comprehend Jesus' predictions of his death, the comparative data indicates that following the initial prediction (Matthew 16, Mark 8), Peter's objection led to Jesus' rebuke. Post the third prediction (Matthew 20, Mark 10, Luke 18), the texts explicitly state their lack of understanding, with the meaning being concealed.
  • What common element is consistently present in the predictions of Jesus' death across the Synoptic Gospels?: A recurring element within the Synoptic Gospels is Jesus' foretelling of his own death and subsequent resurrection on the third day.
  • What are the Synoptic Gospels, and what do they collectively describe concerning Jesus?: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) document multiple instances of Jesus foretelling his own demise. The narrative structure often shows an escalation, with initial predictions leading to a more detailed final foretelling of his crucifixion.

Luke 9:43-45 states that the disciples understood Jesus' second prediction but were afraid to ask him about it.

Answer: False

Luke 9:43-45 indicates that the disciples did not comprehend Jesus' second prediction and were apprehensive about inquiring further.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the Gospel of Luke's account of the second prediction (Luke 9:43-45) describe the disciples' state of mind?: Luke 9:43-45 reports that following Jesus' second prediction, the disciples failed to grasp its meaning, as it was concealed from them, leading to their apprehension about asking for clarification.
  • In what ways does Luke's account of Jesus' predictions differ from Matthew's and Mark's?: Luke's Gospel characteristically abbreviates the accounts of Jesus' predictions. For example, Luke 9:22 omits the dialogue between Jesus and Peter in the first prediction, and Luke 9:43-45 states that the disciples failed to comprehend the second prediction and were hesitant to inquire.

The comparison table indicates that the disciples' understanding of Jesus' predictions improved significantly after the first instance.

Answer: False

The comparison table indicates that the disciples' understanding of Jesus' predictions did not improve significantly; rather, they often remained confused or fearful.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the difference in the disciples' comprehension of Jesus' predictions between the first and third instances as presented in the table?: Although the disciples generally struggled to comprehend Jesus' predictions of his death, the comparative data indicates that following the initial prediction (Matthew 16, Mark 8), Peter's objection led to Jesus' rebuke. Post the third prediction (Matthew 20, Mark 10, Luke 18), the texts explicitly state their lack of understanding, with the meaning being concealed.
  • What is the significance of the comparison table in the article regarding Jesus' predictions?: The comparative table offers a structured analysis of Jesus' predictions of death and resurrection as documented in Matthew, Mark, and Luke, emphasizing variations in the details of suffering and the disciples' responses.
  • How does the table compare the disciples' understanding of Jesus' predictions across the Synoptic Gospels?: The comparative analysis reveals that in Matthew 17:22-23 and Mark 9:30-32, the disciples failed to comprehend Jesus' predictions, with Mark noting their fear of inquiry. Luke 9:43-45 echoes this lack of understanding and apprehension, while Luke 18:31-34 explicitly states their complete lack of comprehension, with the meaning being concealed from them.

What was Peter's reaction to Jesus' first prediction of his death, and how did Jesus respond?

Answer: Peter objected, and Jesus rebuked him, calling him Satan.

Peter objected to Jesus' first prediction of his death, stating 'Far be it from you, Lord; this shall not happen to you!' Jesus responded by rebuking him, saying, 'Get behind me, Satan!'

Related Concepts:

  • How did Peter react to Jesus' first prediction of his death, and what was Jesus' response?: Peter's objection to Jesus' prediction, expressed as 'Far be it from you, Lord; this shall not happen to you!', elicited a sharp rebuke from Jesus, who commanded, 'Get behind me, Satan! You do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men.'
  • What is the difference in the disciples' comprehension of Jesus' predictions between the first and third instances as presented in the table?: Although the disciples generally struggled to comprehend Jesus' predictions of his death, the comparative data indicates that following the initial prediction (Matthew 16, Mark 8), Peter's objection led to Jesus' rebuke. Post the third prediction (Matthew 20, Mark 10, Luke 18), the texts explicitly state their lack of understanding, with the meaning being concealed.
  • Describe the context and content of the first prediction of Jesus' death in the Gospel of Mark.: The initial prediction of Jesus' suffering and death occurs near Caesarea Philippi, following Peter's confession. Jesus informed his disciples that the 'Son of Man' would endure suffering, rejection by religious authorities (elders, chief priests, teachers of the law), death, and resurrection on the third day.

What was the disciples' reaction to the second prediction of Jesus' death in Matthew 17:22-23, according to the source?

Answer: They were exceedingly sorrowful.

According to Matthew 17:22-23, the disciples were exceedingly sorrowful following the second prediction of Jesus' death.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the table show about the disciples' reaction to the second prediction of Jesus' death in Matthew 17:22-23?: In the aftermath of the second prediction of his death, as recorded in Matthew 17:22-23, the disciples are described as having been 'exceedingly sorrowful.'
  • What is the difference in the disciples' comprehension of Jesus' predictions between the first and third instances as presented in the table?: Although the disciples generally struggled to comprehend Jesus' predictions of his death, the comparative data indicates that following the initial prediction (Matthew 16, Mark 8), Peter's objection led to Jesus' rebuke. Post the third prediction (Matthew 20, Mark 10, Luke 18), the texts explicitly state their lack of understanding, with the meaning being concealed.
  • How does the table compare the disciples' understanding of Jesus' predictions across the Synoptic Gospels?: The comparative analysis reveals that in Matthew 17:22-23 and Mark 9:30-32, the disciples failed to comprehend Jesus' predictions, with Mark noting their fear of inquiry. Luke 9:43-45 echoes this lack of understanding and apprehension, while Luke 18:31-34 explicitly states their complete lack of comprehension, with the meaning being concealed from them.

What did Luke 9:43-45 state about the disciples' understanding after Jesus' second prediction?

Answer: They did not understand, and the saying was hidden from them.

Luke 9:43-45 states that after Jesus' second prediction, the disciples did not understand the saying, and it was hidden from them, leading to their apprehension about asking for clarification.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the Gospel of Luke's account of the second prediction (Luke 9:43-45) describe the disciples' state of mind?: Luke 9:43-45 reports that following Jesus' second prediction, the disciples failed to grasp its meaning, as it was concealed from them, leading to their apprehension about asking for clarification.
  • In what ways does Luke's account of Jesus' predictions differ from Matthew's and Mark's?: Luke's Gospel characteristically abbreviates the accounts of Jesus' predictions. For example, Luke 9:22 omits the dialogue between Jesus and Peter in the first prediction, and Luke 9:43-45 states that the disciples failed to comprehend the second prediction and were hesitant to inquire.

The phrase "Get behind me, Satan!" was Jesus' response to which event?

Answer: Peter's objection to the first prediction of his death.

The phrase 'Get behind me, Satan!' was Jesus' response to Peter's objection to his first prediction of his death.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Peter react to Jesus' first prediction of his death, and what was Jesus' response?: Peter's objection to Jesus' prediction, expressed as 'Far be it from you, Lord; this shall not happen to you!', elicited a sharp rebuke from Jesus, who commanded, 'Get behind me, Satan! You do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men.'

What did Matthew 17:22-23 state about the disciples' state after the second prediction?

Answer: They were exceedingly sorrowful.

Matthew 17:22-23 states that after the second prediction, the disciples were exceedingly sorrowful.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the table show about the disciples' reaction to the second prediction of Jesus' death in Matthew 17:22-23?: In the aftermath of the second prediction of his death, as recorded in Matthew 17:22-23, the disciples are described as having been 'exceedingly sorrowful.'
  • What is the difference in the disciples' comprehension of Jesus' predictions between the first and third instances as presented in the table?: Although the disciples generally struggled to comprehend Jesus' predictions of his death, the comparative data indicates that following the initial prediction (Matthew 16, Mark 8), Peter's objection led to Jesus' rebuke. Post the third prediction (Matthew 20, Mark 10, Luke 18), the texts explicitly state their lack of understanding, with the meaning being concealed.

How did the disciples' understanding of Jesus' predictions compare across the Synoptic Gospels, based on the table?

Answer: They consistently failed to understand, often showing fear or sorrow.

Based on the table, the disciples' understanding of Jesus' predictions across the Synoptic Gospels was consistently poor; they often failed to comprehend, showing fear or sorrow.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the difference in the disciples' comprehension of Jesus' predictions between the first and third instances as presented in the table?: Although the disciples generally struggled to comprehend Jesus' predictions of his death, the comparative data indicates that following the initial prediction (Matthew 16, Mark 8), Peter's objection led to Jesus' rebuke. Post the third prediction (Matthew 20, Mark 10, Luke 18), the texts explicitly state their lack of understanding, with the meaning being concealed.
  • What is the significance of the comparison table in the article regarding Jesus' predictions?: The comparative table offers a structured analysis of Jesus' predictions of death and resurrection as documented in Matthew, Mark, and Luke, emphasizing variations in the details of suffering and the disciples' responses.
  • How does the table compare the disciples' understanding of Jesus' predictions across the Synoptic Gospels?: The comparative analysis reveals that in Matthew 17:22-23 and Mark 9:30-32, the disciples failed to comprehend Jesus' predictions, with Mark noting their fear of inquiry. Luke 9:43-45 echoes this lack of understanding and apprehension, while Luke 18:31-34 explicitly states their complete lack of comprehension, with the meaning being concealed from them.

Scholarly Analysis and Historical Context

Walter Schmithals suggests that certain predictions in Mark might be redactional formulations by the author.

Answer: True

Scholar Walter Schmithals posits that some of the predictions concerning Jesus' passion within the Gospel of Mark may represent redactional formulations by the evangelist.

Related Concepts:

  • What scholarly perspective exists regarding the "Passion" predictions in Mark's Gospel?: Scholarly examination of Jesus' passion predictions suggests some may stem from earlier traditions available to the authors, while figures like Walter Schmithals propose redactional formulation by the authors, acknowledging inherent complexities.

The Q source is considered by scholars to contain predictions of Jesus' death.

Answer: False

Scholarly consensus suggests that the hypothetical Q source does not contain any explicit predictions of Jesus' death.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the scholarly consensus regarding the presence of Jesus' death predictions in the Q source?: The hypothetical Q source, presumed to be a collection of Jesus' sayings utilized by the authors of Matthew and Luke, is not generally recognized by scholars as containing any predictions of Jesus' death.

The term "Son of Man" could refer to a personal pronoun like "I" or "myself".

Answer: True

The designation 'Son of Man,' as used in the Gospels, could function as a personal pronoun, equivalent to 'I' or 'myself'.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the article state about the potential use of the "Son of Man" title by Jesus himself?: The article elucidates that the term 'Son of Man' possessed multifaceted meanings, including its use as a personal pronoun, and that Jesus employed it to refer to himself, frequently in conjunction with his suffering and resurrection.
  • What are the various meanings attributed to the term "Son of Man" in different contexts?: The term 'Son of Man' exhibits diverse semantic ranges, encompassing references to all humanity, a generic human being, a personal pronoun ('I' or 'myself'), an unjust individual contrasted with a righteous one, and the eschatological figure of the Messiah.

Crucifixion was a punishment permitted by Jewish law during the Second Temple period.

Answer: False

Jewish law during the Second Temple period did not permit crucifixion as a form of capital punishment.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the article state about the Roman legal context for crucifixion?: Ancient Roman jurisprudence sanctioned crucifixion as capital punishment for specific individuals, including slaves and pirates, a practice relevant to Jesus' prediction of crucifixion by Gentiles.
  • What does the text state about the Jewish legal stance on crucifixion?: The provided text explicitly states that crucifixion was not a permitted form of punishment within Jewish legal tradition.

The "chief priests" during the Second Temple period were members of the Sanhedrin.

Answer: False

The source material indicates that while 'elders' referred to members of the Sanhedrin, 'chief priests' were distinct high priestly families and not considered members of the Sanhedrin in this context.

Related Concepts:

  • Who constituted the "elders," "chief priests," and "scribes" Jesus predicted would reject the Son of Man during the Second Temple period?: Within the socio-religious structure of the Second Temple period, 'elders' denoted members of the Sanhedrin, while 'chief priests' referred to the high priestly families, who were also considered successors to Ezra and interpreters of the Law.

The prediction that the Son of Man would be crucified aligns with Roman, but not Jewish, legal practices of the time.

Answer: True

The prediction of the Son of Man being crucified aligns with Roman capital punishment practices, as crucifixion was not a permitted form of punishment under Jewish law during the Second Temple period.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the article state about the Roman legal context for crucifixion?: Ancient Roman jurisprudence sanctioned crucifixion as capital punishment for specific individuals, including slaves and pirates, a practice relevant to Jesus' prediction of crucifixion by Gentiles.
  • Why is the prediction of the Son of Man being crucified by Gentiles historically significant?: The prediction of crucifixion is significant as it aligns with Roman capital punishment practices, given that Judaism did not permit crucifixion, while Roman law sanctioned it for individuals like slaves and pirates.

The article focuses solely on predictions found within the Gospel of John.

Answer: False

The scope of the article extends beyond the Gospel of John, encompassing predictions found within the Synoptic Gospels as well.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary focus of the article "Jesus predicts his death"?: The central objective of the article is to meticulously detail the occurrences within the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) where Jesus foretold his own death, encompassing contextual details, precise wording, and scholarly analyses.
  • What does the article suggest about the timing of Jesus' predictions of his death relative to his entry into Jerusalem?: The article observes that the Gospel of Matthew contains a prediction of crucifixion occurring prior to Jesus' arrival in Jerusalem, suggesting that certain foretellings transpired as Jesus neared the city for his final Passover observance.

The Book of Wisdom is cited as a reference for Jesus' prediction in Mark 9:32.

Answer: True

The Book of Wisdom is cited as a significant reference point for Jesus' prediction recorded in Mark 9:32.

Related Concepts:

  • What Old Testament passage is referenced in relation to Jesus' prediction in Mark 9:32, as noted in the article?: The article highlights the Book of Wisdom, citing verses 2:12 and 2:17-20 (KJV), as a primary reference for Jesus' prediction recorded in Mark 9:32.

The scholarly debate regarding Jesus' death predictions centers on whether they were spoken by Jesus or formulated later by the Gospel writers.

Answer: True

The scholarly debate concerning Jesus' predictions of his death primarily revolves around their authenticity, questioning whether they were actual sayings of Jesus or later formulations by the Gospel authors.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary focus of the article "Jesus predicts his death"?: The central objective of the article is to meticulously detail the occurrences within the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) where Jesus foretold his own death, encompassing contextual details, precise wording, and scholarly analyses.
  • What are the Synoptic Gospels, and what do they collectively describe concerning Jesus?: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) document multiple instances of Jesus foretelling his own demise. The narrative structure often shows an escalation, with initial predictions leading to a more detailed final foretelling of his crucifixion.
  • What does the article suggest about the timing of Jesus' predictions of his death relative to his entry into Jerusalem?: The article observes that the Gospel of Matthew contains a prediction of crucifixion occurring prior to Jesus' arrival in Jerusalem, suggesting that certain foretellings transpired as Jesus neared the city for his final Passover observance.

What is the scholarly consensus regarding predictions of Jesus' death within the Q source?

Answer: The Q source is not considered by scholars to contain any predictions of Jesus' death.

Scholars generally do not consider the hypothetical Q source to contain any predictions of Jesus' death.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the scholarly consensus regarding the presence of Jesus' death predictions in the Q source?: The hypothetical Q source, presumed to be a collection of Jesus' sayings utilized by the authors of Matthew and Luke, is not generally recognized by scholars as containing any predictions of Jesus' death.
  • What does the article suggest about the timing of Jesus' predictions of his death relative to his entry into Jerusalem?: The article observes that the Gospel of Matthew contains a prediction of crucifixion occurring prior to Jesus' arrival in Jerusalem, suggesting that certain foretellings transpired as Jesus neared the city for his final Passover observance.

The term "Son of Man" could refer to which of the following, according to the article?

Answer: A personal pronoun like "I" or "myself"

According to the article, the term 'Son of Man' could signify a personal pronoun, such as 'I' or 'myself'.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the article state about the potential use of the "Son of Man" title by Jesus himself?: The article elucidates that the term 'Son of Man' possessed multifaceted meanings, including its use as a personal pronoun, and that Jesus employed it to refer to himself, frequently in conjunction with his suffering and resurrection.
  • What are the various meanings attributed to the term "Son of Man" in different contexts?: The term 'Son of Man' exhibits diverse semantic ranges, encompassing references to all humanity, a generic human being, a personal pronoun ('I' or 'myself'), an unjust individual contrasted with a righteous one, and the eschatological figure of the Messiah.

Why is the prediction of crucifixion by Gentiles historically significant according to the text?

Answer: It aligns with Roman capital punishment practices, not Jewish ones.

The prediction of crucifixion by Gentiles is historically significant because crucifixion was a Roman capital punishment, whereas it was not permitted under Jewish law during the Second Temple period.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the article state about the Roman legal context for crucifixion?: Ancient Roman jurisprudence sanctioned crucifixion as capital punishment for specific individuals, including slaves and pirates, a practice relevant to Jesus' prediction of crucifixion by Gentiles.
  • What specific details about the manner of Jesus' death are mentioned in the third prediction as recorded in Matthew, Mark, and Luke?: The third prediction, present in Matthew 20:17-19, Mark 10:32-34, and Luke 18:31-34, consistently details Jesus' delivery to the Gentiles, mockery, insult, spitting, scourging, and death, with Matthew specifically mentioning crucifixion.
  • What does the term "gentile" mean in the context of Jesus' predictions?: Within the context of Jesus' predictions, the term 'Gentile' denotes individuals who are not of Jewish ethnicity.

Which group constituted the "elders" Jesus predicted would reject the Son of Man during the Second Temple period?

Answer: Members of the Sanhedrin

During the Second Temple period, the 'elders' referred to members of the Sanhedrin, the Jewish high court.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific groups within the Jewish leadership are mentioned as being involved in the condemnation and betrayal of Jesus according to the predictions?: The predictions consistently indicate that Jesus would be delivered to the elders, chief priests, and scribes, who constituted the principal religious authorities of Judaism during that epoch.

Which statement accurately reflects the scholarly debate mentioned regarding Jesus' death predictions in Mark's Gospel?

Answer: Some scholars suggest the predictions might be redactional formulations by the author.

A scholarly perspective suggests that some predictions of Jesus' death in Mark's Gospel might be redactional formulations by the author.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary focus of the article "Jesus predicts his death"?: The central objective of the article is to meticulously detail the occurrences within the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) where Jesus foretold his own death, encompassing contextual details, precise wording, and scholarly analyses.
  • What are the Synoptic Gospels, and what do they collectively describe concerning Jesus?: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) document multiple instances of Jesus foretelling his own demise. The narrative structure often shows an escalation, with initial predictions leading to a more detailed final foretelling of his crucifixion.

What does the article state about the Jewish legal stance on crucifixion during the time of Jesus?

Answer: Judaism did not allow crucifixion as a means of punishment.

The article states that Judaism did not permit crucifixion as a method of capital punishment during the time of Jesus.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the text state about the Jewish legal stance on crucifixion?: The provided text explicitly states that crucifixion was not a permitted form of punishment within Jewish legal tradition.

Which Old Testament passage is referenced in relation to Jesus' prediction in Mark 9:32, according to the article?

Answer: Book of Wisdom (2:12, 2:17-20 KJV)

The article highlights the Book of Wisdom, citing verses 2:12 and 2:17-20 (KJV), as a primary reference for Jesus' prediction recorded in Mark 9:32.

Related Concepts:

  • What Old Testament passage is referenced in relation to Jesus' prediction in Mark 9:32, as noted in the article?: The article highlights the Book of Wisdom, citing verses 2:12 and 2:17-20 (KJV), as a primary reference for Jesus' prediction recorded in Mark 9:32.

What does the article suggest about the primary focus of the text "Jesus predicts his death"?

Answer: Detailing instances of Jesus predicting his own death in the Gospels.

The article primarily focuses on detailing the instances where Jesus predicted his own death across the Synoptic Gospels.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the primary focus of the article "Jesus predicts his death"?: The central objective of the article is to meticulously detail the occurrences within the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) where Jesus foretold his own death, encompassing contextual details, precise wording, and scholarly analyses.
  • What does the article suggest about the timing of Jesus' predictions of his death relative to his entry into Jerusalem?: The article observes that the Gospel of Matthew contains a prediction of crucifixion occurring prior to Jesus' arrival in Jerusalem, suggesting that certain foretellings transpired as Jesus neared the city for his final Passover observance.
  • What are the Synoptic Gospels, and what do they collectively describe concerning Jesus?: The Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) document multiple instances of Jesus foretelling his own demise. The narrative structure often shows an escalation, with initial predictions leading to a more detailed final foretelling of his crucifixion.

Which of the following is NOT listed as a meaning for the term "Son of Man" in the article?

Answer: A specific title for the Roman Emperor

The article does not list 'A specific title for the Roman Emperor' as a meaning for the term 'Son of Man'.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the article state about the potential use of the "Son of Man" title by Jesus himself?: The article elucidates that the term 'Son of Man' possessed multifaceted meanings, including its use as a personal pronoun, and that Jesus employed it to refer to himself, frequently in conjunction with his suffering and resurrection.
  • What are the various meanings attributed to the term "Son of Man" in different contexts?: The term 'Son of Man' exhibits diverse semantic ranges, encompassing references to all humanity, a generic human being, a personal pronoun ('I' or 'myself'), an unjust individual contrasted with a righteous one, and the eschatological figure of the Messiah.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy