Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



The Concept of Karma Across Eastern and Western Traditions

At a Glance

Title: The Concept of Karma Across Eastern and Western Traditions

Total Categories: 7

Category Stats

  • Core Concepts and Etymology of Karma: 12 flashcards, 21 questions
  • Karma in Hindu Philosophical Traditions: 10 flashcards, 15 questions
  • Karma in Buddhist Thought: 7 flashcards, 11 questions
  • Karma in Jain Philosophy: 10 flashcards, 13 questions
  • Karma in Other Eastern Spiritual Traditions: 7 flashcards, 8 questions
  • Philosophical and Ethical Debates on Karma: 10 flashcards, 13 questions
  • Karma in Western Thought and Modern Interpretations: 10 flashcards, 14 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 66
  • True/False Questions: 51
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 44
  • Total Questions: 95

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about The Concept of Karma Across Eastern and Western Traditions

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Karma" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: The Concept of Karma Across Eastern and Western Traditions

Study Guide: The Concept of Karma Across Eastern and Western Traditions

Core Concepts and Etymology of Karma

Karma, in ancient Indian concepts, is fundamentally defined as an action, work, or deed, and its subsequent effect or consequences, originating from the Sanskrit 'karma' and Pali 'kamma'.

Answer: True

The term 'karma' originates from Sanskrit and Pali, fundamentally denoting an action or deed and its resulting consequences, forming a principle of cause and effect in Indian religions.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the fundamental definition of Karma, according to ancient Indian concepts?: Karma, derived from Sanskrit 'karma' and Pali 'kamma', is an ancient Indian concept referring to an action, work, or deed, and its subsequent effect or consequences. In Indian religions, it specifically denotes a principle of cause and effect where an individual's intentions and actions influence their future outcomes.

All Indian religious scriptures consistently link good intent and deeds directly to happier rebirths, and bad intent and deeds to worse rebirths.

Answer: False

While good deeds and intentions generally lead to favorable rebirths and bad deeds to unfavorable ones, some Indian scriptures do not establish a direct or universal link between karma and rebirth, indicating a nuanced understanding.

Related Concepts:

  • How is Karma generally understood to influence an individual's future, particularly in relation to rebirths?: Generally, good intent and good deeds are believed to contribute to positive karma, leading to more favorable rebirths, while negative intent and actions contribute to adverse karma, resulting in less favorable rebirths. However, some scriptures indicate no direct or universal link between rebirth and karma.

In Sanskrit terminology, the specific term for fate, destiny, or predetermination is Prarabdha, which distinguishes it from the broader concept of karma.

Answer: True

The Sanskrit term Prarabdha specifically denotes fate, destiny, or predetermination, differentiating it from karma, which refers to actions and their consequences, emphasizing agency.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the concept of karma differ from fate or destiny in Sanskrit terminology?: While karma is often mistakenly equated with fate, destiny, or predetermination, in Sanskrit, the specific term for fate or predetermination is *Prarabdha*. This distinguishes it from the broader concept of karma, which encompasses actions and their consequences, emphasizing agency rather than strict predetermination.

The concept of karma is closely linked with rebirth in Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism, and Taoism.

Answer: True

The concept of karma is indeed closely associated with rebirth (samsara) in numerous Indian religions, including Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism, as well as in Taoism.

Related Concepts:

  • Which Indian religions primarily associate the concept of karma with the idea of rebirth or *samsara*?: The concept of karma is closely linked with the idea of rebirth, or *samsara*, in many schools of Indian religions, particularly Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism. Taoism also shares this association.

The endless knot, often seen on Nepalese temple prayer wheels, symbolizes the interlinking of cause and effect, representing an eternal karmic cycle.

Answer: True

The endless knot, a common motif in Asian cultures, particularly on Nepalese temple prayer wheels, symbolizes the interconnectedness of cause and effect and the eternal nature of the karmic cycle.

Related Concepts:

  • What do the endless knot and prayer wheel symbolize in Asian cultures regarding karma?: Karma symbols like the endless knot, frequently seen on Nepalese temple prayer wheels, are common cultural motifs in Asia. These knots symbolize the interlinking of cause and effect, representing an eternal karmic cycle and the interconnectedness of phenomena.

According to Wilhelm Halbfass, *kriya* refers to the executed action as a consequence of activity, while *karma* denotes the activity itself, including the steps and effort involved.

Answer: False

Wilhelm Halbfass states the opposite: *kriya* refers to the activity itself, while *karma* denotes the executed action as a consequence of that activity, including the intention behind it.

Related Concepts:

  • According to Wilhelm Halbfass, how does 'karma' differ from 'kriya' in Sanskrit?: Wilhelm Halbfass explains that *kriya* refers to the activity itself, including the steps and effort involved, while *karma* denotes the executed action as a consequence of that activity. It also refers to the intention of the actor behind an executed or planned action, which some scholars describe as a metaphysical residue left in the actor.

The moral quality of an act, in terms of creating good or bad karma, is determined solely by the deed itself, not the underlying motive.

Answer: False

The moral quality of an act and its karmic outcome are determined by both the deed itself and, crucially, the underlying motive or intention behind the action.

Related Concepts:

  • What role do intention and action play in creating positive or negative karma?: Both positive actions and positive intentions contribute to good karma, while negative actions and negative intentions lead to bad karma. This highlights that the moral quality of an act is determined not just by the deed itself, but crucially by the underlying motive or intention.

Indologists typically define the principle of karma as a combination of causality, ethicization, and rebirth.

Answer: True

Indologists commonly define the principle of karma as encompassing three key components: causality (ethical or non-ethical), ethicization (good/bad actions have consequences), and rebirth (the cycle of reincarnation).

Related Concepts:

  • What are the three main components that Indologists often combine to define the principle of karma from ancient Indian texts?: Indologists typically define the principle of karma as a combination of three components: (1) causality, which can be ethical or non-ethical; (2) ethicization, meaning that good or bad actions have consequences; and (3) rebirth, the cycle of reincarnation.

The law of karma is understood to operate independently of any deity or divine judgment, functioning as an inherent principle of the universe.

Answer: True

The law of karma is generally understood as an inherent, impersonal principle of the universe, operating independently of any specific deity or divine judgment, where actions naturally lead to consequences.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the law of karma operate in relation to deities or divine judgment?: The law of karma is generally understood to operate independently of any deity or any process of divine judgment. It is seen as an inherent principle of the universe, where actions naturally lead to corresponding consequences without external intervention.

*Samskara* refers to the visible or invisible effect of karma that is typically immediate or occurs within the current life.

Answer: False

*Samskara* is an invisible effect produced within the actor that transforms them and influences their capacity for happiness or unhappiness in present and future lives. *Phala* refers to the visible or invisible effect that is typically immediate or occurs within the current life.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the two forms in which the consequences or effects of karma can be described?: The consequences of karma can be described in two forms: *phala*, which refers to the visible or invisible effect that is typically immediate or occurs within the current life, and *samskara*, an invisible effect produced within the actor that transforms them and influences their capacity for happiness or unhappiness in present and future lives.

The lotus flower symbolically represents karma in many Asian traditions because it blooms and carries seeds simultaneously, with the seed as cause and flower as effect.

Answer: True

The lotus flower is a powerful symbol of karma in Asian traditions, representing the simultaneous presence of cause (seed) and effect (flower), and serving as a reminder of growth and purity amidst challenging circumstances.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the symbolic meaning of the lotus flower in many Asian traditions regarding karma?: In many Asian traditions, the lotus flower symbolically represents karma. A blooming lotus is unique because it simultaneously carries seeds while it blooms, with the seed seen as the cause and the flower as the effect. It also serves as a reminder that one can grow, share good karma, and remain unstained even in challenging circumstances.

According to ancient Indian concepts, what is the fundamental definition of Karma?

Answer: An action, work, or deed, and its subsequent effect or consequences.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the fundamental definition of Karma, according to ancient Indian concepts?: Karma, derived from Sanskrit 'karma' and Pali 'kamma', is an ancient Indian concept referring to an action, work, or deed, and its subsequent effect or consequences. In Indian religions, it specifically denotes a principle of cause and effect where an individual's intentions and actions influence their future outcomes.

Which of the following statements accurately describes the general understanding of karma's influence on an individual's future, particularly concerning rebirths?

Answer: Good intent and good deeds contribute to good karma, leading to happier rebirths, while bad intent and bad deeds result in worse rebirths, though some scriptures indicate no direct link.

Related Concepts:

  • How is Karma generally understood to influence an individual's future, particularly in relation to rebirths?: Generally, good intent and good deeds are believed to contribute to positive karma, leading to more favorable rebirths, while negative intent and actions contribute to adverse karma, resulting in less favorable rebirths. However, some scriptures indicate no direct or universal link between rebirth and karma.

What is the Sanskrit term specifically used for fate, destiny, or predetermination, distinguishing it from the broader concept of karma?

Answer: Prarabdha

Related Concepts:

  • How does the concept of karma differ from fate or destiny in Sanskrit terminology?: While karma is often mistakenly equated with fate, destiny, or predetermination, in Sanskrit, the specific term for fate or predetermination is *Prarabdha*. This distinguishes it from the broader concept of karma, which encompasses actions and their consequences, emphasizing agency rather than strict predetermination.

Which of the following religions is NOT explicitly mentioned as primarily associating the concept of karma with the idea of rebirth or samsara?

Answer: Judaism

Related Concepts:

  • Which Indian religions primarily associate the concept of karma with the idea of rebirth or *samsara*?: The concept of karma is closely linked with the idea of rebirth, or *samsara*, in many schools of Indian religions, particularly Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism. Taoism also shares this association.

According to Wilhelm Halbfass, how does *karma* differ from *kriya* in Sanskrit?

Answer: *Kriya* refers to the activity itself, while *karma* denotes the executed action and the intention behind it.

Related Concepts:

  • According to Wilhelm Halbfass, how does 'karma' differ from 'kriya' in Sanskrit?: Wilhelm Halbfass explains that *kriya* refers to the activity itself, including the steps and effort involved, while *karma* denotes the executed action as a consequence of that activity. It also refers to the intention of the actor behind an executed or planned action, which some scholars describe as a metaphysical residue left in the actor.

What is crucial in determining the moral quality of an act and its contribution to good or bad karma?

Answer: Both the deed itself and the underlying motive or intention.

Related Concepts:

  • What role do intention and action play in creating positive or negative karma?: Both positive actions and positive intentions contribute to good karma, while negative actions and negative intentions lead to bad karma. This highlights that the moral quality of an act is determined not just by the deed itself, but crucially by the underlying motive or intention.

Why is it challenging to arrive at a single, universal definition of karma?

Answer: Due to the diverse views among various schools of Indian religions, with differing emphasis on karma and rebirth.

Related Concepts:

  • Why is it difficult to arrive at a single, universal definition of karma?: Defining karma is challenging due to the diverse views among various schools of Indian religions, including Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. Some schools consider karma and rebirth essential and linked, others prioritize karma but not rebirth, and a few even dismiss both as flawed. This diversity means karma has multiple definitions and meanings across traditions.

What are the three main components Indologists combine to define the principle of karma from ancient Indian texts?

Answer: Causality, ethicization, and rebirth.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the three main components that Indologists often combine to define the principle of karma from ancient Indian texts?: Indologists typically define the principle of karma as a combination of three components: (1) causality, which can be ethical or non-ethical; (2) ethicization, meaning that good or bad actions have consequences; and (3) rebirth, the cycle of reincarnation.

How does the law of karma operate in relation to deities or divine judgment?

Answer: It operates independently of any deity or divine judgment, as an inherent universal principle.

Related Concepts:

  • How does the law of karma operate in relation to deities or divine judgment?: The law of karma is generally understood to operate independently of any deity or any process of divine judgment. It is seen as an inherent principle of the universe, where actions naturally lead to corresponding consequences without external intervention.

What are the two forms in which the consequences or effects of karma can be described?

Answer: Phala and Samskara

Related Concepts:

  • What are the two forms in which the consequences or effects of karma can be described?: The consequences of karma can be described in two forms: *phala*, which refers to the visible or invisible effect that is typically immediate or occurs within the current life, and *samskara*, an invisible effect produced within the actor that transforms them and influences their capacity for happiness or unhappiness in present and future lives.

Karma in Hindu Philosophical Traditions

Prarabdha karma is the accumulated karma from past actions across many lifetimes, which is currently manifesting and shaping the present life's circumstances.

Answer: False

Prarabdha karma refers specifically to the portion of accumulated past actions (Sanchita karma) that is currently manifesting in one's present life. Sanchita karma is the broader term for all accumulated karma from past lifetimes.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the four traditional classifications of karma in Hinduism?: In Hinduism, karma is traditionally categorized into four types: *Sanchita karma*, the accumulated karma from past actions across many lifetimes; *Prarabdha karma*, the portion of *Sanchita karma* currently manifesting and shaping the present life's circumstances; *Agami karma*, future karma generated by present actions; and *Kriyamana karma*, immediate karma from current actions that may yield results in the present or future.

The earliest association of karma with causality in ancient Indian texts is found in the *Rigveda*.

Answer: False

One of the earliest clear associations of karma with causality is found in the *Brihadaranyaka Upanishad*, not the *Rigveda*, which primarily uses *karman-* to mean 'work' or 'deed' in ritualistic contexts.

Related Concepts:

  • Where does one of the earliest associations of karma with causality appear in ancient Indian texts?: One of the earliest associations of karma with causality is found in the *Brihadaranyaka Upanishad*, specifically in verses 4.4.5–6, which state that a person's actions and behavior determine their future state, becoming pure by pure deeds and bad by bad deeds.
  • What is the significance of *Brihadaranyaka Upanishad* 3.2.13 in the early discussion of karma?: *Brihadaranyaka Upanishad* 3.2.13 provides one of the earliest clear discussions of the karma doctrine, explicitly stating the principles of causality and ethicization: 'Truly, one becomes good through good *deeds*, and evil through evil *deeds*.'

The Vedic Sanskrit word *karman-* appears approximately 400 times in the *Rigveda* and primarily means 'sacrifice'.

Answer: False

The Vedic Sanskrit word *karman-* appears approximately 40 times in the *Rigveda* (not 400) and primarily means 'work' or 'deed,' often in the context of Srauta rituals, rather than exclusively 'sacrifice'.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the meaning of the Vedic Sanskrit word *karman-* and how often does it appear in the *Rigveda*?: The Vedic Sanskrit word *karman-* means 'work' or 'deed' and is frequently used in the context of Srauta rituals. It appears approximately 40 times in the *Rigveda*, primarily referring to ritualistic actions.

The *Satapatha Brahmana* associated the potential for immortality (*amara*) with the karma of the *agnicayana* sacrifice.

Answer: True

The *Satapatha Brahmana* explicitly links the potential for immortality (amara) with the performance of the *agnicayana* sacrifice, highlighting the ritualistic understanding of karma in early Vedic texts.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the *Satapatha Brahmana* associate karma with immortality?: The *Satapatha Brahmana* 1.7.1.5 declares sacrifice as the 'greatest' of works. Furthermore, *Satapatha Brahmana* 10.1.4.1 associates the potential for becoming immortal (amara) with the karma of the *agnicayana* sacrifice, highlighting the ritualistic aspect of early karma concepts.

*Brihadaranyaka Upanishad* 3.2.13 is significant for providing one of the earliest clear discussions of the karma doctrine, explicitly stating causality and ethicization.

Answer: True

*Brihadaranyaka Upanishad* 3.2.13 is indeed a pivotal text, offering one of the earliest explicit discussions of the karma doctrine by stating that individuals become good through good deeds and evil through evil deeds, thereby establishing causality and ethicization.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of *Brihadaranyaka Upanishad* 3.2.13 in the early discussion of karma?: *Brihadaranyaka Upanishad* 3.2.13 provides one of the earliest clear discussions of the karma doctrine, explicitly stating the principles of causality and ethicization: 'Truly, one becomes good through good *deeds*, and evil through evil *deeds*.'
  • Where does one of the earliest associations of karma with causality appear in ancient Indian texts?: One of the earliest associations of karma with causality is found in the *Brihadaranyaka Upanishad*, specifically in verses 4.4.5–6, which state that a person's actions and behavior determine their future state, becoming pure by pure deeds and bad by bad deeds.

The *Mahabharata* teaches that individuals can inherit the good or evil acts of another person, allowing for shared karmic responsibility.

Answer: False

The *Mahabharata* explicitly states, 'As a man himself sows, so he himself reaps; no man inherits the good or evil act of another man,' emphasizing individual responsibility and rejecting inherited karma.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the *Mahabharata* describe the relationship between human actions and their consequences?: The *Mahabharata* states, 'As a man himself sows, so he himself reaps; no man inherits the good or evil act of another man. The fruit is of the same quality as the action.' This emphasizes individual responsibility for one's deeds and their direct results, rejecting inherited karma.

Bhishma, in the *Mahabharata*, asserts that a person's future is solely determined by past human actions, with no role for current free will.

Answer: False

Bhishma in the *Mahabharata* clarifies that the future is a function of both current human effort (free will) and past human actions, indicating that present agency plays a significant role alongside past karma.

Related Concepts:

  • What is Bhishma's response in the *Mahabharata* regarding whether a person's life is destined or shaped by human effort?: In the *Anushasana Parva* of the *Mahabharata*, Bhishma replies that the future is a function of both current human effort, derived from free will, and past human actions that establish the circumstances of one's life, indicating a balance between destiny and agency.

The Nyaya school of Hinduism suggests that the karma doctrine implies the existence of God, while Vedanta schools hold that God is the dispenser of karma's fruits.

Answer: True

The Nyaya school indeed suggests that the karma doctrine implies the existence of God, while Vedanta schools, while accepting karma, posit that God (Isvara) is the dispenser of the fruits (phala) of karma, rather than karma operating entirely autonomously.

Related Concepts:

  • How do the Nyaya and Vedanta schools of Hinduism differ in their views on karma and divine intervention?: The Nyaya school considers karma and rebirth central, with some scholars suggesting that the karma doctrine implies the existence of God. In contrast, the Vedanta schools (including Advaita) accept karma but hold that God (Isvara) is the dispenser of the fruits (phala) of karma, rather than karma functioning solely on its own power.

The Charvaka school of Hinduism, being materialists, denied the theory of karma-rebirth but accepted the existence of God.

Answer: False

The Charvaka school, being materialists, denied both the theory of karma-rebirth and the existence of God, believing causality arose from the interaction of natural phenomena.

Related Concepts:

  • Which school of Hinduism denied the theory of karma-rebirth and the existence of God?: The Charvaka (or Lokayata) school of Hinduism, which were materialists, denied the theory of karma-rebirth as well as the existence of God. They believed that causality arises from the interaction, actions, and nature of things and people, making determinative principles like karma or God unnecessary.

In Hinduism, which type of karma represents the portion of accumulated past actions that is currently manifesting and shaping the present life's circumstances?

Answer: Prarabdha karma

Related Concepts:

  • What are the four traditional classifications of karma in Hinduism?: In Hinduism, karma is traditionally categorized into four types: *Sanchita karma*, the accumulated karma from past actions across many lifetimes; *Prarabdha karma*, the portion of *Sanchita karma* currently manifesting and shaping the present life's circumstances; *Agami karma*, future karma generated by present actions; and *Kriyamana karma*, immediate karma from current actions that may yield results in the present or future.

Where does one of the earliest associations of karma with causality appear in ancient Indian texts?

Answer: The *Brihadaranyaka Upanishad*

Related Concepts:

  • Where does one of the earliest associations of karma with causality appear in ancient Indian texts?: One of the earliest associations of karma with causality is found in the *Brihadaranyaka Upanishad*, specifically in verses 4.4.5–6, which state that a person's actions and behavior determine their future state, becoming pure by pure deeds and bad by bad deeds.
  • What is the significance of *Brihadaranyaka Upanishad* 3.2.13 in the early discussion of karma?: *Brihadaranyaka Upanishad* 3.2.13 provides one of the earliest clear discussions of the karma doctrine, explicitly stating the principles of causality and ethicization: 'Truly, one becomes good through good *deeds*, and evil through evil *deeds*.'

What is the significance of *Brihadaranyaka Upanishad* 3.2.13 in the early discussion of karma?

Answer: It provides one of the earliest clear discussions of the karma doctrine, explicitly stating causality and ethicization.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of *Brihadaranyaka Upanishad* 3.2.13 in the early discussion of karma?: *Brihadaranyaka Upanishad* 3.2.13 provides one of the earliest clear discussions of the karma doctrine, explicitly stating the principles of causality and ethicization: 'Truly, one becomes good through good *deeds*, and evil through evil *deeds*.'
  • Where does one of the earliest associations of karma with causality appear in ancient Indian texts?: One of the earliest associations of karma with causality is found in the *Brihadaranyaka Upanishad*, specifically in verses 4.4.5–6, which state that a person's actions and behavior determine their future state, becoming pure by pure deeds and bad by bad deeds.

According to the *Mahabharata*, what is the relationship between human actions and their consequences?

Answer: As a man himself sows, so he himself reaps; no man inherits the good or evil act of another man.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the *Mahabharata* describe the relationship between human actions and their consequences?: The *Mahabharata* states, 'As a man himself sows, so he himself reaps; no man inherits the good or evil act of another man. The fruit is of the same quality as the action.' This emphasizes individual responsibility for one's deeds and their direct results, rejecting inherited karma.

In the *Anushasana Parva* of the *Mahabharata*, what does Bhishma state about the future?

Answer: The future is a function of both current human effort, derived from free will, and past human actions.

Related Concepts:

  • What is Bhishma's response in the *Mahabharata* regarding whether a person's life is destined or shaped by human effort?: In the *Anushasana Parva* of the *Mahabharata*, Bhishma replies that the future is a function of both current human effort, derived from free will, and past human actions that establish the circumstances of one's life, indicating a balance between destiny and agency.

Which school of Hinduism denied both the theory of karma-rebirth and the existence of God?

Answer: Charvaka (Lokayata) school

Related Concepts:

  • Which school of Hinduism denied the theory of karma-rebirth and the existence of God?: The Charvaka (or Lokayata) school of Hinduism, which were materialists, denied the theory of karma-rebirth as well as the existence of God. They believed that causality arises from the interaction, actions, and nature of things and people, making determinative principles like karma or God unnecessary.

Karma in Buddhist Thought

In some Buddhist traditions, actions performed without any bad intent, such as covetousness, are considered to have a non-existent or neutral karmic impact.

Answer: True

Some Buddhist traditions emphasize that actions performed without negative intentions, such as covetousness, are considered to have a non-existent or neutral karmic impact, underscoring the centrality of intention (cetana) in karmic outcomes.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the karmic impact of disinterested or unintentional actions in some Buddhist traditions?: In some Buddhist traditions, actions performed or originating without any bad intent, such as covetousness, are considered to have a non-existent or neutral karmic impact. This emphasizes the importance of intention (cetana) in determining karmic outcomes.

In Buddhism, karma refers to actions driven by intention (*cetana*), as stated in the *Nibbedhika Sutta*.

Answer: True

The *Nibbedhika Sutta* explicitly defines karma in Buddhism as actions driven by intention (cetana), whether through body, speech, or mind, highlighting the mental component as central to karmic generation.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Buddhist understanding of karma, as stated in the *Nibbedhika Sutta*?: In the Buddhist tradition, karma refers to actions driven by intention (cetana), meaning a deed done deliberately through body, speech, or mind that leads to future consequences. The *Nibbedhika Sutta* states, 'Intention (cetana) I tell you, is kamma. Intending, one does kamma by way of body, speech, & intellect.'

Buddha's teaching of karma is strictly deterministic, similar to the view of Jains, where the karmic effect of a deed is solely based on the deed itself.

Answer: False

Buddha's teaching of karma is not strictly deterministic like the Jain view; it is flexible and dynamic, incorporating circumstantial factors and recognizing that the karmic effect depends on the nature of the person and the circumstances, not solely the deed itself.

Related Concepts:

  • How does Buddha's teaching of karma differ from the strictly deterministic view of Jains?: Unlike the Jains' strictly deterministic view, Buddha's teaching of karma is not strictly deterministic. It incorporates circumstantial factors, such as other *Niyamas*, making it a flexible, fluid, and dynamic process rather than a rigid, mechanical one. The karmic effect of a deed depends not only on the deed itself but also on the nature of the person and the circumstances.

In Buddhism, *karmaphala* is considered a 'judgment' enforced by a God or Deity.

Answer: False

In Buddhism, *karmaphala* is understood as the natural outcome of a process of cause and effect, not a 'judgment' enforced by a God or any supernatural being.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Buddhist perspective on *karmaphala* in relation to divine judgment?: In Buddhism, *karmaphala* is not considered a 'judgment' enforced by a God, Deity, or any other supernatural being. Instead, it is understood as the natural outcome of a process of cause and effect, operating impersonally.

The *Acintita Sutta* warns that the results of karma are one of four incomprehensible subjects, beyond full understanding through logical thought.

Answer: True

The *Acintita Sutta* indeed identifies 'the results of karma' as one of four incomprehensible subjects (acinteyya), suggesting that their full understanding lies beyond conventional logical thought and reason.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the *Acintita Sutta* warn about regarding the results of karma?: The *Acintita Sutta* cautions that 'the results of karma' are one of the four incomprehensible subjects (acinteyya). These subjects are beyond full conceptualization and cannot be fully understood through logical thought or reason, highlighting the complexity of karmic outcomes.

Nichiren Buddhism teaches that adverse karma is unchangeable and must be endured as a fixed consequence of past actions.

Answer: False

Nichiren Buddhism teaches that adverse karma can be transformed and changed through faith and practice, allowing negative past causes to be converted into positive future benefits, emphasizing agency and spiritual transformation.

Related Concepts:

  • How does Nichiren Buddhism approach the concept of adverse karma?: Nichiren Buddhism teaches that through faith and practice, individuals can transform and change adverse karma. This means that negative causes made in the past, which would typically result in negative outcomes in the present and future, can be converted into positive causes that bring future benefits, emphasizing agency and transformation.

In some Buddhist traditions, what is the karmic impact of actions performed without any bad intent, such as covetousness?

Answer: They are considered to have a non-existent or neutral karmic impact.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the karmic impact of disinterested or unintentional actions in some Buddhist traditions?: In some Buddhist traditions, actions performed or originating without any bad intent, such as covetousness, are considered to have a non-existent or neutral karmic impact. This emphasizes the importance of intention (cetana) in determining karmic outcomes.

What is the Buddhist understanding of karma, as stated in the *Nibbedhika Sutta*?

Answer: Karma refers to actions driven by intention (*cetana*) through body, speech, or mind.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Buddhist understanding of karma, as stated in the *Nibbedhika Sutta*?: In the Buddhist tradition, karma refers to actions driven by intention (cetana), meaning a deed done deliberately through body, speech, or mind that leads to future consequences. The *Nibbedhika Sutta* states, 'Intention (cetana) I tell you, is kamma. Intending, one does kamma by way of body, speech, & intellect.'

How does Buddha's teaching of karma differ from the strictly deterministic view of Jains?

Answer: Buddha's teaching is not strictly deterministic, incorporating circumstantial factors and making it flexible.

Related Concepts:

  • How does Buddha's teaching of karma differ from the strictly deterministic view of Jains?: Unlike the Jains' strictly deterministic view, Buddha's teaching of karma is not strictly deterministic. It incorporates circumstantial factors, such as other *Niyamas*, making it a flexible, fluid, and dynamic process rather than a rigid, mechanical one. The karmic effect of a deed depends not only on the deed itself but also on the nature of the person and the circumstances.

What is the Buddhist perspective on *karmaphala* in relation to divine judgment?

Answer: *Karmaphala* is the natural outcome of a process of cause and effect, not a divine judgment.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Buddhist perspective on *karmaphala* in relation to divine judgment?: In Buddhism, *karmaphala* is not considered a 'judgment' enforced by a God, Deity, or any other supernatural being. Instead, it is understood as the natural outcome of a process of cause and effect, operating impersonally.

What does Nichiren Buddhism teach about adverse karma?

Answer: Adverse karma can be transformed and changed through faith and practice.

Related Concepts:

  • How does Nichiren Buddhism approach the concept of adverse karma?: Nichiren Buddhism teaches that through faith and practice, individuals can transform and change adverse karma. This means that negative causes made in the past, which would typically result in negative outcomes in the present and future, can be converted into positive causes that bring future benefits, emphasizing agency and transformation.

Karma in Jain Philosophy

In Jainism, karma is described as 'karmic dirt,' consisting of subtle particles of matter attracted to a soul's karmic field by mental, verbal, and physical activities.

Answer: True

Jainism uniquely defines karma as 'karmic dirt,' comprising subtle particles of matter that are attracted to a soul's karmic field through various activities, leading to its defilement.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the unique meaning of karma in Jainism compared to Hindu philosophy and Western civilization?: In Jainism, karma conveys a meaning distinct from Hindu philosophy and Western civilization. It is referred to as 'karmic dirt,' consisting of very subtle particles of matter that permeate the entire universe and are attracted to a soul's karmic field through mental, verbal, and physical activities, as well as mental dispositions.

The seven *tattvas* in Jain philosophy include *Jiva* (the soul), *Ajiva* (the non-soul), and *Moksha* (complete annihilation of all karmic matter).

Answer: True

The seven *tattvas* (truths) in Jain philosophy indeed include *Jiva* (soul), *Ajiva* (non-soul), and *Moksha* (complete annihilation of karmic matter), among others, forming the fundamental constituents of reality.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the seven *tattvas* (truths or fundamentals) that constitute reality in Jain philosophy?: The seven *tattvas* in Jain philosophy are: *Jiva* (the soul characterized by consciousness), *Ajiva* (the non-soul), *Asrava* (inflow of karmic matter), *Bandha* (bondage of soul and karmas), *Samvara* (stoppage of karmic inflow), *Nirjara* (gradual dissociation of karmic matter), and *Moksha* (complete annihilation of all karmic matter).

Padmanabh Jaini notes that Jainism, like Hinduism and some Buddhist schools, allows for exceptions where individuals may not reap the fruits of their own karma, such as through ritual offerings or merit transfer.

Answer: False

Padmanabh Jaini highlights that Jainism uniquely emphasizes that individuals reap only the fruits of their own karma, without exception, contrasting with Hinduism and some Buddhist schools that allow for practices like ritual offerings or merit transfer.

Related Concepts:

  • According to Padmanabh Jaini, how does Jainism's stance on reaping one's own karma differ from Hinduism and Buddhism?: Padmanabh Jaini notes that Jainism uniquely emphasizes that individuals reap only the fruits of their own karma, without exception. This contrasts with Hinduism, which has practices like *shrardha* (ritual offerings) and notions of divine intervention, and Buddhism, which developed theories of boon-granting bodhisattvas and merit transfer. Jainism has consistently resisted such ideas within its community.

In Jainism, the analogy of gold mixed with impurities is used to explain that the soul is naturally pure at its origin and only becomes impure through external karmic influence.

Answer: True

The Jain analogy of gold mixed with impurities explains that the soul is inherently pure at its origin, and its impurity arises from the accumulation of external karmic matter, which can be refined through spiritual effort.

Related Concepts:

  • What analogy is used in Jainism to explain the relationship between the soul and karma?: The relationship between the soul and karma in Jainism is explained using the analogy of gold. Just as gold is naturally found mixed with impurities, the soul is considered impure at its origin. Through effort and proper refining methods, the soul can be purified, similar to how gold is refined, emphasizing the soul's inherent purity.

*Jnanavarniya* karma in Jainism is a deluding karma that causes the soul to be infatuated with favorable objects and repelled by unfavorable ones.

Answer: False

*Jnanavarniya* karma is a knowledge-obstructing karma that acts like a veil, preventing the soul from fully knowing. The description provided in the question corresponds to *Mohniya* karma, which is a deluding karma.

Related Concepts:

  • What is *Jnanavarniya* karma in Jain philosophy?: *Jnanavarniya* karma is a knowledge-obstructing karma in Jainism, which acts like a veil, preventing the soul from fully knowing an object and its details. It obstructs the soul's essential quality of knowledge, and in its absence, a soul would be omniscient.
  • What is the function of *Mohniya* karma in Jainism?: *Mohniya* karma is a deluding karma that causes the soul to be infatuated with favorable objects and repelled by unfavorable ones. It creates the delusion that external objects can affect the soul, thereby obstructing its essential quality of happiness and preventing it from finding pure joy within itself.

*Vedaniya* karma is a sensation-producing karma that causes a soul to experience pleasure and pain, disturbing its inherent bliss.

Answer: True

*Vedaniya* karma is indeed a sensation-producing karma in Jainism, responsible for causing the soul to experience pleasure and pain, thereby disturbing its inherent state of bliss.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe *Vedaniya* karma and its effect on the soul in Jainism.: *Vedaniya* karma is a sensation-producing karma that causes a soul to experience pleasure and pain, likened to licking honey from a sword. This karma continuously disturbs the soul's inherent bliss with external sensual experiences, whereas in its absence, the soul would experience undisturbed happiness.

*Antaraya* karma in Jain philosophy is a body-producing karma that assigns various types of bodies to souls.

Answer: False

*Antaraya* karma is a power-obstructing karma that prevents the soul from utilizing its innate powers. The description provided in the question corresponds to *Nama* karma, which is a body-producing karma.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the role of *Antaraya* karma in Jain philosophy?: *Antaraya* karma is a power-obstructing karma that prevents the soul from utilizing its innate power for acts such as charity, profit, enjoyment, repeated enjoyment, and willpower. It obstructs the manifestation of the soul's essential quality of infinite power, which would be present in its absence.
  • How does *Nama* karma determine a living organism's body in Jainism?: *Nama* karma is a body-producing karma that assigns various types of bodies to souls, classified by different attributes. It is this karma that specifically determines the physical form and characteristics of the living organism into which a soul will enter.

In Jainism, what is the unique meaning of karma, distinguishing it from Hindu philosophy and Western civilization?

Answer: It refers to 'karmic dirt,' subtle particles of matter attracted to a soul's karmic field.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the unique meaning of karma in Jainism compared to Hindu philosophy and Western civilization?: In Jainism, karma conveys a meaning distinct from Hindu philosophy and Western civilization. It is referred to as 'karmic dirt,' consisting of very subtle particles of matter that permeate the entire universe and are attracted to a soul's karmic field through mental, verbal, and physical activities, as well as mental dispositions.

Which of the following is NOT one of the seven *tattvas* (truths or fundamentals) that constitute reality in Jain philosophy?

Answer: Maya (illusion)

Related Concepts:

  • What are the seven *tattvas* (truths or fundamentals) that constitute reality in Jain philosophy?: The seven *tattvas* in Jain philosophy are: *Jiva* (the soul characterized by consciousness), *Ajiva* (the non-soul), *Asrava* (inflow of karmic matter), *Bandha* (bondage of soul and karmas), *Samvara* (stoppage of karmic inflow), *Nirjara* (gradual dissociation of karmic matter), and *Moksha* (complete annihilation of all karmic matter).

According to Padmanabh Jaini, how does Jainism's stance on reaping one's own karma differ from Hinduism and Buddhism?

Answer: Jainism uniquely emphasizes that individuals reap only the fruits of their own karma, without exception.

Related Concepts:

  • According to Padmanabh Jaini, how does Jainism's stance on reaping one's own karma differ from Hinduism and Buddhism?: Padmanabh Jaini notes that Jainism uniquely emphasizes that individuals reap only the fruits of their own karma, without exception. This contrasts with Hinduism, which has practices like *shrardha* (ritual offerings) and notions of divine intervention, and Buddhism, which developed theories of boon-granting bodhisattvas and merit transfer. Jainism has consistently resisted such ideas within its community.

What is the function of *Jnanavarniya* karma in Jain philosophy?

Answer: It obstructs the soul's essential quality of knowledge, acting like a veil.

Related Concepts:

  • What is *Jnanavarniya* karma in Jain philosophy?: *Jnanavarniya* karma is a knowledge-obstructing karma in Jainism, which acts like a veil, preventing the soul from fully knowing an object and its details. It obstructs the soul's essential quality of knowledge, and in its absence, a soul would be omniscient.

Which type of karma in Jainism causes a soul to experience pleasure and pain, disturbing its inherent bliss?

Answer: Vedaniya karma

Related Concepts:

  • Describe *Vedaniya* karma and its effect on the soul in Jainism.: *Vedaniya* karma is a sensation-producing karma that causes a soul to experience pleasure and pain, likened to licking honey from a sword. This karma continuously disturbs the soul's inherent bliss with external sensual experiences, whereas in its absence, the soul would experience undisturbed happiness.

What is the role of *Mohniya* karma in Jainism?

Answer: It causes the soul to be infatuated with favorable objects and repelled by unfavorable ones, creating delusion.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the function of *Mohniya* karma in Jainism?: *Mohniya* karma is a deluding karma that causes the soul to be infatuated with favorable objects and repelled by unfavorable ones. It creates the delusion that external objects can affect the soul, thereby obstructing its essential quality of happiness and preventing it from finding pure joy within itself.

Karma in Other Eastern Spiritual Traditions

In Sikhism, the law of karma dictates that individuals harvest exactly what they sow, no more and no less, holding everyone accountable for their present and future state.

Answer: True

Sikhism's law of karma is indeed understood as a principle where individuals reap precisely what they sow, emphasizing strict accountability for one's actions and their consequences in both present and future states.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the analogy used in Sikhism to explain the law of karma?: In Sikhism, life is compared to a field where one's karma is the seed. The law of karma dictates that individuals harvest exactly what they sow, no more and no less, holding everyone accountable for their present and future state.

According to David Ownby, Falun Gong defines 'karma' as an exclusively positive term, representing the source of all spiritual growth.

Answer: False

David Ownby states that Falun Gong defines 'karma' as an exclusively negative term, representing the source of all suffering, while 'good karma' in other traditions is referred to as *de* ('virtue').

Related Concepts:

  • How does Falun Gong's definition of 'karma' differ from that in Buddhism, according to David Ownby?: According to David Ownby, Falun Gong's definition of 'karma' differs from Buddhism in that it is understood as an exclusively negative term, representing the source of all suffering. What Buddhism might call 'good karma' is referred to as *de* ('virtue') in Falun Gong.

Li Hongzhi, founder of Falun Gong, states that the purpose of human life is to accumulate karma to achieve higher forms of existence.

Answer: False

Li Hongzhi, founder of Falun Gong, teaches that the purpose of human life is to awaken quickly and return to one's original state, thereby avoiding further reincarnation and the accumulation of karma, which is viewed negatively.

Related Concepts:

  • What does Li Hongzhi, the founder of Falun Gong, state is the purpose of human life in the context of karma?: Li Hongzhi states that in the eyes of higher beings, the purpose of human life is not merely to exist as a human, but to awaken quickly on Earth, which he calls a 'setting of delusion,' and return to one's original state. Those who fail to return will continue to reincarnate, accumulating karma until they are destroyed.

In Taoism, karma is tracked by deities and spirits, with rewards or retribution following one's deeds like a shadow.

Answer: True

Taoism incorporates the concept of karma, where deeds are tracked by deities and spirits, and rewards or retribution are believed to follow one's actions, akin to a shadow, ensuring a form of cosmic justice.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Taoist perspective on karma and how it is tracked?: In Taoism, karma is an important concept where every deed is tracked by deities and spirits. Rewards or retribution are believed to follow karma, much like a shadow follows a person, ensuring cosmic justice.

In Sikhism, what analogy is used to explain the law of karma?

Answer: Life is a field where one's karma is the seed, and individuals harvest what they sow.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the analogy used in Sikhism to explain the law of karma?: In Sikhism, life is compared to a field where one's karma is the seed. The law of karma dictates that individuals harvest exactly what they sow, no more and no less, holding everyone accountable for their present and future state.

According to David Ownby, how does Falun Gong's definition of 'karma' differ from that in Buddhism?

Answer: Falun Gong understands karma as an exclusively negative term, representing the source of all suffering.

Related Concepts:

  • How does Falun Gong's definition of 'karma' differ from that in Buddhism, according to David Ownby?: According to David Ownby, Falun Gong's definition of 'karma' differs from Buddhism in that it is understood as an exclusively negative term, representing the source of all suffering. What Buddhism might call 'good karma' is referred to as *de* ('virtue') in Falun Gong.

What does Li Hongzhi, the founder of Falun Gong, state is the purpose of human life in the context of karma?

Answer: To awaken quickly on Earth and return to one's original state, avoiding further reincarnation and karma accumulation.

Related Concepts:

  • What does Li Hongzhi, the founder of Falun Gong, state is the purpose of human life in the context of karma?: Li Hongzhi states that in the eyes of higher beings, the purpose of human life is not merely to exist as a human, but to awaken quickly on Earth, which he calls a 'setting of delusion,' and return to one's original state. Those who fail to return will continue to reincarnate, accumulating karma until they are destroyed.

What is the Taoist perspective on karma and how it is tracked?

Answer: Karma is tracked by deities and spirits, with rewards or retribution following like a shadow.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Taoist perspective on karma and how it is tracked?: In Taoism, karma is an important concept where every deed is tracked by deities and spirits. Rewards or retribution are believed to follow karma, much like a shadow follows a person, ensuring cosmic justice.

Philosophical and Ethical Debates on Karma

The 'moral agency problem' in karma doctrine questions if individuals are truly responsible for their actions if past karma predetermines their behavior and suffering.

Answer: True

The 'moral agency problem' is a central debate in karma doctrine, questioning the extent of individual responsibility and free will if past karma is perceived to predetermine one's actions and experiences.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'moral agency problem' in the context of the karma doctrine?: The 'moral agency problem' is a significant controversy concerning whether the karma doctrine always implies destiny, thereby impacting free will. It questions if individuals are truly responsible for their actions if past karma predetermines their behavior and suffering, raising ethical dilemmas.

Hindu schools like Yoga and Advaita Vedanta argue that karma theory only accounts for past actions, thus negating free will in the present.

Answer: False

Hindu schools such as Yoga and Advaita Vedanta argue that karma encompasses both past actions and present intentions, thereby affirming free will and moral agency in the present, as individuals create new karma through their intentional acts.

Related Concepts:

  • What is one of the arguments from Hindu schools like Yoga and Advaita Vedanta that allows for free will despite karma?: One argument from Hindu schools like Yoga and Advaita Vedanta is that the theory of karma encompasses both the action and the intention behind it. Individuals are not only affected by past karma but also create new karma through intentional acts, whether good or bad, thus affirming free will and moral agency in the present.

The 'psychological indeterminacy' problem arises because individuals cannot know their past karma, making it unclear what actions to take in the present to improve their future.

Answer: True

The 'psychological indeterminacy' problem highlights the challenge of knowing one's past karma, which can lead to ambiguity about effective present actions for improving future outcomes or alleviating suffering.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'psychological indeterminacy' problem associated with the theory of karma?: The 'psychological indeterminacy' problem arises because if individuals cannot know their past karma and if it determines their future, they are left unclear about what actions they can take in the present to improve their future, achieve happiness, or reduce suffering. For instance, it becomes ambiguous whether a sickness or failure is due to past karma or a correctable cause, leading to uncertainty in moral action.

The transferability of karma merit and demerit is widely accepted across all Indian religions as a means to enhance ethical foundations.

Answer: False

The transferability of karma merit and demerit is a controversial concept, not widely accepted across all Indian religions, as it is seen by some to undermine ethical foundations and individual accountability.

Related Concepts:

  • Why is the transferability of karma merit and demerit a controversial concept in Indian religions?: The transferability of karma merit and demerit, particularly allowed in some Buddhist schools, is controversial because it is seen to undermine ethical foundations and dissociate causality and ethicization from the moral agent. Critics argue it raises questions similar to substitutionary atonement and vicarious punishment, potentially diluting individual responsibility.

Some Buddhist schools defend karma merit transfer by clarifying it's for sharing positive spiritual benefits, not transferring bad karma.

Answer: True

Some Buddhist schools defend karma merit transfer by explaining it as a means to share positive spiritual benefits and encourage religious giving, rather than a mechanism for transferring negative karma (demerit).

Related Concepts:

  • How do some Buddhist schools defend the concept of karma merit transfer?: Proponents in some Buddhist schools suggest that the concept of karma merit transfer serves to encourage religious giving and communal spiritual practice. They clarify that such transfers are not a mechanism to transfer bad karma (demerit) from one person to another, but rather a way to share positive spiritual benefits and accumulate collective merit.

The problem of theodicy is often considered more significant in many schools of major Indian religions than in Western religions due to their emphasis on an omnibenevolent creator.

Answer: False

The problem of theodicy is often considered less significant in many Indian religions because they do not universally assume an omnibenevolent creator God in the same way as monotheistic Western religions, and suffering is often attributed to individual karma.

Related Concepts:

  • Why is the problem of theodicy often considered less significant in many schools of major Indian religions compared to Western religions?: Many Indian religions do not assume an omnibenevolent creator, and some theistic schools define their deities differently than monotheistic Western religions. Indian deities are often seen as personal and cosmic facilitators, rather than all-powerful judges. This shifts the focus to the karma principle for innate justice, making the problem of theodicy less central or of a different nature, as suffering is often attributed to individual karma rather than divine will.

The *Mahabharata* suggests that the existence of good and evil can be attributed to three theories: divine ordination, karma, and chance events.

Answer: True

The *Mahabharata* indeed presents three theories for the existence of good and evil: divine ordination, the principle of karma, and chance events (yadrccha), offering a multifaceted ancient Indian perspective.

Related Concepts:

  • What three prevailing theories for the existence of good and evil are suggested in the *Mahabharata*?: The *Mahabharata* suggests three prevailing theories in ancient India for the existence of good and evil: that everything is ordained by God, that it is a result of karma, and that it arises from chance events (yadrccha), offering a multifaceted view on the origins of moral outcomes.

What is the 'moral agency problem' in the context of the karma doctrine?

Answer: The controversy over whether karma implies destiny, impacting free will and individual responsibility.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'moral agency problem' in the context of the karma doctrine?: The 'moral agency problem' is a significant controversy concerning whether the karma doctrine always implies destiny, thereby impacting free will. It questions if individuals are truly responsible for their actions if past karma predetermines their behavior and suffering, raising ethical dilemmas.

How do some Hindu schools like Yoga and Advaita Vedanta allow for free will despite karma?

Answer: They assert that karma encompasses both action and intention, allowing individuals to create new karma through intentional acts.

Related Concepts:

  • What is one of the arguments from Hindu schools like Yoga and Advaita Vedanta that allows for free will despite karma?: One argument from Hindu schools like Yoga and Advaita Vedanta is that the theory of karma encompasses both the action and the intention behind it. Individuals are not only affected by past karma but also create new karma through intentional acts, whether good or bad, thus affirming free will and moral agency in the present.

What is the 'psychological indeterminacy' problem associated with the theory of karma?

Answer: The ambiguity regarding what actions to take in the present to improve the future, given unknown past karma.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'psychological indeterminacy' problem associated with the theory of karma?: The 'psychological indeterminacy' problem arises because if individuals cannot know their past karma and if it determines their future, they are left unclear about what actions they can take in the present to improve their future, achieve happiness, or reduce suffering. For instance, it becomes ambiguous whether a sickness or failure is due to past karma or a correctable cause, leading to uncertainty in moral action.

Why is the transferability of karma merit and demerit a controversial concept in Indian religions?

Answer: It is seen to undermine ethical foundations and dissociate causality from the moral agent.

Related Concepts:

  • Why is the transferability of karma merit and demerit a controversial concept in Indian religions?: The transferability of karma merit and demerit, particularly allowed in some Buddhist schools, is controversial because it is seen to undermine ethical foundations and dissociate causality and ethicization from the moral agent. Critics argue it raises questions similar to substitutionary atonement and vicarious punishment, potentially diluting individual responsibility.

Which Hindu philosophies and Jainism generally hold that karma cannot be transferred?

Answer: Yoga and Advaita Vedantic philosophies, along with Jainism.

Related Concepts:

  • Which Hindu philosophies and Jainism generally hold that karma cannot be transferred?: Other schools within Hinduism, such as the Yoga and Advaita Vedantic philosophies, along with Jainism, maintain that karma cannot be transferred from one individual to another, emphasizing strict individual accountability for actions.
  • According to Padmanabh Jaini, how does Jainism's stance on reaping one's own karma differ from Hinduism and Buddhism?: Padmanabh Jaini notes that Jainism uniquely emphasizes that individuals reap only the fruits of their own karma, without exception. This contrasts with Hinduism, which has practices like *shrardha* (ritual offerings) and notions of divine intervention, and Buddhism, which developed theories of boon-granting bodhisattvas and merit transfer. Jainism has consistently resisted such ideas within its community.

What is one reason the problem of theodicy is often considered less significant in many schools of major Indian religions compared to Western religions?

Answer: Many Indian religions do not assume an omnibenevolent creator, and deities are defined differently.

Related Concepts:

  • Why is the problem of theodicy often considered less significant in many schools of major Indian religions compared to Western religions?: Many Indian religions do not assume an omnibenevolent creator, and some theistic schools define their deities differently than monotheistic Western religions. Indian deities are often seen as personal and cosmic facilitators, rather than all-powerful judges. This shifts the focus to the karma principle for innate justice, making the problem of theodicy less central or of a different nature, as suffering is often attributed to individual karma rather than divine will.

Karma in Western Thought and Modern Interpretations

New Agers exclusively view karma as a system designed to enforce punishment for past actions, emphasizing cosmic balance.

Answer: False

Many New Agers perceive karma as a law of cause and effect that ensures cosmic balance, but they often emphasize that it is not primarily a system designed to enforce punishment for past actions, but rather for learning and growth.

Related Concepts:

  • What do New Agers generally believe about karma?: Many New Agers perceive karma as a law of cause and effect that ensures cosmic balance. While acknowledging this principle, they often emphasize that it is not a system designed to enforce punishment for past actions, but rather a mechanism for learning and growth.

Karl Potter and Harold Coward suggest that the karmic principle can be understood as a principle of psychology and habit, shaping a person's nature and self-perception.

Answer: True

Karl Potter and Harold Coward propose a psychological understanding of karma, viewing it as a principle of habit formation (vasana) that shapes an individual's nature and self-perception, influencing their experience of life events.

Related Concepts:

  • How do Karl Potter and Harold Coward suggest the karmic principle can be understood psychologically?: Karl Potter and Harold Coward propose that the karmic principle can be understood as a principle of psychology and habit. They suggest that karma seeds habits (vasana) which, in turn, shape a person's nature, and also influences self-perception, affecting how one experiences life events.

The Christian concept of Last Judgment is similar to karma in that both are ongoing processes occurring daily throughout one's life.

Answer: False

Most scholars differentiate the Christian Last Judgment as a singular, one-time event at the end of life, whereas karma is understood as an ongoing process of cause and effect throughout one's existence.

Related Concepts:

  • How do most scholars differentiate the Christian concept of Last Judgment from karma?: Most scholars distinguish the Christian concept of a Last Judgment from karma by noting that karma is an ongoing process occurring daily throughout one's life, where actions continuously generate consequences. In contrast, the Last Judgment is typically understood as a singular, one-time review at the end of life or at the end of time.

In Judaism, the concept of *midah k'neged midah*, or 'measure for measure,' has been compared to karma by David Wolpe.

Answer: True

David Wolpe has drawn a comparison between the Jewish concept of *midah k'neged midah* ('measure for measure'), which relates to divine retribution, and the principle of karma, highlighting a parallel in ethical causality.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the concept in Judaism that David Wolpe compared to karma?: In Judaism, there is a concept called *midah k'neged midah*, often translated as 'measure for measure.' This concept, which pertains to divine retribution for a person's actions, was compared to karma by David Wolpe, highlighting a parallel in ethical causality.

Carl Jung stated that 'When an inner situation is not made conscious, it appears outside as fate,' which relates to the psychological aspect of karma.

Answer: True

Carl Jung's statement, 'When an inner situation is not made conscious, it appears outside as fate,' resonates with the psychological dimension of karma, suggesting that unresolved internal states can manifest as external circumstances or patterns.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Carl Jung describe the external manifestation of an unconscious inner situation, relating to karma?: Carl Jung once stated, 'When an inner situation is not made conscious, it appears outside as fate.' This quote touches upon the psychological aspect of unresolved emotions influencing one's experiences, which can be related to the synchronicity of karmic patterns manifesting in one's life.

From a psychoanalytic perspective, meditation and metacognition aim to reduce negative karma by enhancing emotional self-awareness, potentially causing permanent neuronal changes.

Answer: True

Psychoanalytic perspectives suggest that practices like meditation and metacognition can enhance emotional self-awareness, leading to improved emotional hygiene and a reduction in negative karmic impacts, potentially inducing lasting neuronal changes.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the role of meditation and metacognition in relation to karma, according to psychoanalytic perspectives?: From a psychoanalytic perspective, popular methods like meditation and metacognition aim to enhance emotional self-awareness, thereby helping individuals avoid negative karma. This process leads to improved emotional hygiene and reduced karmic impacts, with long-term practice potentially causing permanent neuronal changes in the brain, suggesting a psychological mechanism for karmic transformation.

The Theosophical Society played a key role in popularizing the idea of karma in the Western world, where it became a precursor to concepts like the Neopagan 'law of return'.

Answer: True

The Theosophical Society was instrumental in popularizing the concept of karma in the Western world, where it influenced the development of ideas such as the Neopagan 'law of return' or 'Threefold Law'.

Related Concepts:

  • How was the idea of karma introduced and popularized in the Western world?: The idea of karma gained popularity in the Western world through the efforts of the Theosophical Society. In this context, karma became a precursor to concepts like the Neopagan 'law of return' or 'Threefold Law,' which posits that the beneficial or harmful effects one creates will return to oneself, often threefold.

How do many New Agers generally perceive karma?

Answer: As a law of cause and effect that ensures cosmic balance, not necessarily for punishment.

Related Concepts:

  • What do New Agers generally believe about karma?: Many New Agers perceive karma as a law of cause and effect that ensures cosmic balance. While acknowledging this principle, they often emphasize that it is not a system designed to enforce punishment for past actions, but rather a mechanism for learning and growth.

How do Karl Potter and Harold Coward suggest the karmic principle can be understood psychologically?

Answer: As a principle of psychology and habit, shaping a person's nature and self-perception.

Related Concepts:

  • How do Karl Potter and Harold Coward suggest the karmic principle can be understood psychologically?: Karl Potter and Harold Coward propose that the karmic principle can be understood as a principle of psychology and habit. They suggest that karma seeds habits (vasana) which, in turn, shape a person's nature, and also influences self-perception, affecting how one experiences life events.

What Christian notion is considered similar to karma, as expressed in phrases like 'one reaps what one sows'?

Answer: The idea of 'what goes around comes around' and reaping what one sows.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the Christian notion that is considered similar to karma?: Western culture, influenced by Christianity, holds a notion similar to karma, often expressed by the phrase 'what goes around comes around.' Christian teachings also include morals like 'one reaps what one sows' (Galatians 6:7) and 'live by the sword, die by the sword' (Matthew 26:52), reflecting a principle of reciprocal justice.

How do most scholars differentiate the Christian concept of Last Judgment from karma?

Answer: The Last Judgment is a singular, one-time review at the end of life, whereas karma is an ongoing process.

Related Concepts:

  • How do most scholars differentiate the Christian concept of Last Judgment from karma?: Most scholars distinguish the Christian concept of a Last Judgment from karma by noting that karma is an ongoing process occurring daily throughout one's life, where actions continuously generate consequences. In contrast, the Last Judgment is typically understood as a singular, one-time review at the end of life or at the end of time.

What concept in Judaism did David Wolpe compare to karma?

Answer: Midah k'neged midah ('measure for measure').

Related Concepts:

  • What is the concept in Judaism that David Wolpe compared to karma?: In Judaism, there is a concept called *midah k'neged midah*, often translated as 'measure for measure.' This concept, which pertains to divine retribution for a person's actions, was compared to karma by David Wolpe, highlighting a parallel in ethical causality.

What did Theosophist I. K. Taimni state about the nature of karma?

Answer: Karma is the Law of Cause and Effect operating in human life, bringing adjustments between individuals.

Related Concepts:

  • What did Theosophist I. K. Taimni state about the nature of karma?: Theosophist I. K. Taimni described karma as 'nothing but the Law of Cause and Effect operating in the realm of human life and bringing about adjustments between an individual and other individuals whom he has affected by his thoughts, emotions and actions,' emphasizing its role in interpersonal and cosmic balance.

What is a specific teaching of Theosophy regarding reincarnation and life forms?

Answer: Humans always reincarnate as humans only.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a specific teaching of Theosophy regarding reincarnation and life forms?: A specific teaching within Theosophy is that when humans reincarnate, they always return as humans only, and not as animals or other types of organisms, distinguishing its view from some Eastern traditions.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy