Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



India's Other Backward Classes (OBC) Policy and Social Dynamics

At a Glance

Title: India's Other Backward Classes (OBC) Policy and Social Dynamics

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • Constitutional Framework and Early Commissions: 4 flashcards, 7 questions
  • The Mandal Commission: Identification and Recommendations: 5 flashcards, 6 questions
  • Judicial Scrutiny and the 'Creamy Layer' Principle: 9 flashcards, 13 questions
  • Reservation Implementation and Challenges: 9 flashcards, 15 questions
  • Contemporary Caste Surveys and Commissions: 11 flashcards, 19 questions
  • Social Mobility and Historical Context: 6 flashcards, 12 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 44
  • True/False Questions: 42
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 30
  • Total Questions: 72

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about India's Other Backward Classes (OBC) Policy and Social Dynamics

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Other Backward Class" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: India's Other Backward Classes (OBC) Policy and Social Dynamics

Study Guide: India's Other Backward Classes (OBC) Policy and Social Dynamics

Constitutional Framework and Early Commissions

The term 'Other Backward Class' (OBC) is used by the Indian government to denote communities identified as educationally or socially backward.

Answer: True

The Government of India utilizes the term 'Other Backward Class' (OBC) to designate communities recognized as being educationally or socially disadvantaged.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the definition of 'Other Backward Class' (OBC) as used by the Government of India?: The Government of India uses the term 'Other Backward Class' (OBC) to classify communities that are identified as 'educationally or socially backward,' meaning they are disadvantaged. This classification is one of several official categories for the population of India, alongside general castes and Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (SCs and STs).

The Indian Constitution refers to OBCs as 'socially and educationally backward classes' (SEBC) and obligates the government to ensure their development.

Answer: True

The Indian Constitution designates OBCs as 'socially and educationally backward classes' (SEBC) and mandates the government to promote their social and educational advancement.

Related Concepts:

  • How are OBCs referred to in the Indian Constitution, and what obligation does the government have towards them?: In the Indian Constitution, OBCs are described as socially and educationally backward classes (SEBC). The Government of India is enjoined by the Constitution to ensure their social and educational development, which includes providing reservations.

Article 340 of the Indian Constitution empowers the President to establish a commission to investigate the conditions of socially and educationally backward classes.

Answer: True

Article 340 of the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to appoint a commission tasked with examining the conditions of socially and educationally backward classes.

Related Concepts:

  • What does Article 340 of the Indian Constitution state about the government's role concerning socially and educationally backward classes?: Article 340 of the Indian Constitution mandates that the President may appoint a commission to investigate the conditions of socially and educationally backward classes (SEBC) within India, identify their difficulties, and make recommendations for steps to improve their situation and provide necessary grants.

The Kalelkar Commission, established in 1953, recommended reserving 70% of seats in technical institutions for backward classes.

Answer: True

The First Backward Classes Commission, known as the Kalelkar Commission, recommended reserving 70% of seats in technical institutions for backward classes, among other proposals.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Kalelkar Commission, and what were its key recommendations?: The Kalelkar Commission, established in 1953 and chaired by Kaka Kalelkar, was the First Backward Classes Commission. It recommended a caste-wise enumeration of the population, treating social backwardness as linked to caste hierarchy, considering all women as backward, and reserving 70% of seats in technical institutions and vacancies in government services for backward classes. However, the government did not accept its report, primarily due to concerns about the criteria and potential swamping of needy groups.

The government fully accepted and implemented all recommendations of the Kalelkar Commission.

Answer: False

The government did not accept the Kalelkar Commission's report in its entirety, primarily due to concerns regarding the criteria used for identifying backwardness and the potential impact of its recommendations.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Kalelkar Commission, and what were its key recommendations?: The Kalelkar Commission, established in 1953 and chaired by Kaka Kalelkar, was the First Backward Classes Commission. It recommended a caste-wise enumeration of the population, treating social backwardness as linked to caste hierarchy, considering all women as backward, and reserving 70% of seats in technical institutions and vacancies in government services for backward classes. However, the government did not accept its report, primarily due to concerns about the criteria and potential swamping of needy groups.

Which article of the Indian Constitution empowers the President to appoint a commission to investigate the conditions of socially and educationally backward classes?

Answer: Article 340

Article 340 of the Indian Constitution provides the President with the authority to establish a commission to investigate the conditions of socially and educationally backward classes.

Related Concepts:

  • What does Article 340 of the Indian Constitution state about the government's role concerning socially and educationally backward classes?: Article 340 of the Indian Constitution mandates that the President may appoint a commission to investigate the conditions of socially and educationally backward classes (SEBC) within India, identify their difficulties, and make recommendations for steps to improve their situation and provide necessary grants.

What was the primary role of the Kalelkar Commission?

Answer: To be the First Backward Classes Commission and make recommendations.

The Kalelkar Commission, established in 1953, served as the First Backward Classes Commission, tasked with making recommendations regarding the identification and upliftment of backward classes.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Kalelkar Commission, and what were its key recommendations?: The Kalelkar Commission, established in 1953 and chaired by Kaka Kalelkar, was the First Backward Classes Commission. It recommended a caste-wise enumeration of the population, treating social backwardness as linked to caste hierarchy, considering all women as backward, and reserving 70% of seats in technical institutions and vacancies in government services for backward classes. However, the government did not accept its report, primarily due to concerns about the criteria and potential swamping of needy groups.

The Mandal Commission: Identification and Recommendations

According to the Mandal Commission report, Other Backward Classes (OBCs) represented approximately 41% of India's population.

Answer: False

The Mandal Commission report estimated OBCs constituted 52% of India's population. A 2006 National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) report indicated OBCs comprised 41% of the population.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the Mandal Commission report, what percentage of India's population comprised Other Backward Classes (OBCs)?: The Mandal Commission report, published in 1980, estimated that Other Backward Classes (OBCs) constituted 52% of India's total population.
  • What percentage did the National Sample Survey Organisation determine the OBC population to be in 2006?: In 2006, the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) determined that OBCs comprised 41% of India's population.

The Mandal Commission recommended a 27% reservation for OBCs in government jobs and educational institutions.

Answer: True

The Mandal Commission's primary recommendation was to implement a 27% reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in government employment and educational institutions.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Mandal Commission's primary finding regarding the OBC population and its key recommendation for reservation?: The Mandal Commission, chaired by B. P. Mandal, estimated the OBC population at 52% and recommended an overall reservation of 27% for OBCs in government jobs and educational institutions, subject to the 50% total reservation ceiling.

The Mandal Commission used only economic criteria to identify Other Backward Classes.

Answer: False

The Mandal Commission utilized 11 indicators to identify OBCs, of which four were economic criteria, alongside social and educational factors.

Related Concepts:

  • What criteria did the Mandal Commission use to identify OBCs?: The Mandal Commission developed 11 indicators or criteria to identify OBCs, with four of these criteria being economic in nature.

The Mandal Commission suggested establishing residential schools and offering vocational training for OBC students.

Answer: True

The commission proposed measures such as adult education programs, residential schools, and vocational training to enhance educational opportunities for OBC students.

Related Concepts:

  • What measures did the Mandal Commission suggest to promote literacy and education among OBCs?: The commission suggested implementing a time-bound adult education program in areas with high OBC concentration, establishing residential schools with free boarding and lodging for backward-class students, providing separate hostels, and offering vocational training. It also recommended reserving seats for OBC students in educational institutions.

What percentage of India's population did the Mandal Commission report estimate comprised Other Backward Classes (OBCs)?

Answer: Approximately 52%

The Mandal Commission report estimated that Other Backward Classes (OBCs) constituted 52% of India's total population.

Related Concepts:

  • According to the Mandal Commission report, what percentage of India's population comprised Other Backward Classes (OBCs)?: The Mandal Commission report, published in 1980, estimated that Other Backward Classes (OBCs) constituted 52% of India's total population.
  • What was the Mandal Commission's primary finding regarding the OBC population and its key recommendation for reservation?: The Mandal Commission, chaired by B. P. Mandal, estimated the OBC population at 52% and recommended an overall reservation of 27% for OBCs in government jobs and educational institutions, subject to the 50% total reservation ceiling.
  • What percentage did the National Sample Survey Organisation determine the OBC population to be in 2006?: In 2006, the National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) determined that OBCs comprised 41% of India's population.

The Mandal Commission identified OBCs using a set of how many indicators?

Answer: Eleven

The Mandal Commission developed 11 indicators, including social, educational, and economic factors, to identify Other Backward Classes.

Related Concepts:

  • What criteria did the Mandal Commission use to identify OBCs?: The Mandal Commission developed 11 indicators or criteria to identify OBCs, with four of these criteria being economic in nature.
  • What was the Mandal Commission's primary finding regarding the OBC population and its key recommendation for reservation?: The Mandal Commission, chaired by B. P. Mandal, estimated the OBC population at 52% and recommended an overall reservation of 27% for OBCs in government jobs and educational institutions, subject to the 50% total reservation ceiling.
  • According to the Mandal Commission report, what percentage of India's population comprised Other Backward Classes (OBCs)?: The Mandal Commission report, published in 1980, estimated that Other Backward Classes (OBCs) constituted 52% of India's total population.

Judicial Scrutiny and the 'Creamy Layer' Principle

The Supreme Court's 1992 decision mandated a 27% reservation for OBCs in civil service positions.

Answer: True

The landmark Supreme Court decision in 1992 mandated the implementation of a 27% reservation for OBCs in civil service positions.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the impact of the Supreme Court's 1992 decision regarding OBC reservations?: The Supreme Court's 1992 decision resulted in a requirement for 27% of civil service positions to be reserved for members of OBCs.

The 'creamy layer' concept excludes the most disadvantaged members within a backward class from reservation benefits.

Answer: False

The 'creamy layer' concept is designed to exclude the socially and economically advanced members of a backward class, ensuring benefits reach the truly disadvantaged.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'creamy layer' concept in the context of OBC reservations?: The 'creamy layer' refers to the socially and economically advanced members within a backward class who are excluded from reservation benefits. This concept was first articulated by Justice Krishna Iyer and later upheld by the Supreme Court in the Indra Sawhney judgment to ensure that reservation benefits reach the truly disadvantaged sections.

The Indra Sawhney judgment upheld the 'creamy layer' principle for excluding affluent sections within OBCs.

Answer: True

The Indra Sawhney judgment (1992) affirmed the 'creamy layer' principle, stipulating that affluent sections within OBCs should be excluded from reservation benefits.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India judgment in 1992 regarding reservations?: The Indra Sawhney judgment upheld the 50% ceiling on reservations, emphasized the concept of 'social backwardness,' and introduced the 'creamy layer' principle for excluding the affluent sections within OBCs from reservation benefits. It also laid down 11 indicators for ascertaining backwardness.

The income threshold for the 'creamy layer' has remained unchanged since its initial setting in 1993.

Answer: False

The income threshold for the 'creamy layer' has been revised multiple times since 1993, increasing progressively to reflect economic changes.

Related Concepts:

  • How has the income threshold for the 'creamy layer' been revised over the years?: The 'creamy layer' criteria were initially set at ₹100,000 in 1993 and have been revised multiple times, increasing to ₹250,000 in 2004, ₹450,000 in 2008, ₹600,000 in 2013, and further to ₹800,000 in August 2017.

The Supreme Court suggested excluding children of professionals like doctors and engineers from reservation benefits.

Answer: True

The Court suggested criteria for 'creamy layer' exclusion, including children of professionals such as doctors and engineers, and those with high family incomes.

Related Concepts:

  • What criteria did the Supreme Court suggest for identifying the 'creamy layer' for exclusion from reservations?: The Supreme Court suggested criteria such as excluding children of individuals with family incomes above a certain threshold (revised to ₹800,000 annually) and excluding children of professionals like doctors, engineers, chartered accountants, high-ranking government officials, and judges. Parliament was also requested to consider excluding children of MPs and MLAs.

The Supreme Court affirmed that the 'creamy layer' principle applies equally to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) as it does to OBCs.

Answer: False

The Supreme Court concluded that the 'creamy layer' principle is applicable to OBCs but not to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs), as they are considered distinct classes.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the Supreme Court conclude about the application of the 'creamy layer' principle to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs)?: The Supreme Court concluded that the 'creamy layer' principle, which excludes the affluent sections of a group from reservation benefits, is primarily applicable to Other Backward Classes (OBCs). It is not applicable to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) because they are considered distinct classes in themselves, not subject to the same internal socio-economic stratification that necessitates the 'creamy layer' exclusion.

The Indra Sawhney judgment established that the 'creamy layer' principle is applicable to both OBCs and SCs/STs.

Answer: False

The Indra Sawhney judgment established that the 'creamy layer' principle applies to OBCs but not to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs).

Related Concepts:

  • What did the Supreme Court conclude about the application of the 'creamy layer' principle to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs)?: The Supreme Court concluded that the 'creamy layer' principle, which excludes the affluent sections of a group from reservation benefits, is primarily applicable to Other Backward Classes (OBCs). It is not applicable to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) because they are considered distinct classes in themselves, not subject to the same internal socio-economic stratification that necessitates the 'creamy layer' exclusion.

The 'creamy layer' income bar was set at ₹800,000 annually as of August 2017.

Answer: True

By August 2017, the income threshold for the 'creamy layer' exclusion was revised to ₹800,000 annually.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'creamy layer' income bar, and how has it been adjusted over time?: The 'creamy layer' income bar is a financial threshold used to identify and exclude affluent individuals within Other Backward Classes (OBCs) from receiving reservation benefits. This threshold was initially set at ₹100,000 in 1993 and has been progressively increased to ₹800,000 annually by August 2017, reflecting adjustments for inflation and economic changes.

What was the key outcome of the Supreme Court's 1992 judgment regarding OBC reservations?

Answer: It mandated a 27% reservation for OBCs in civil service positions.

The Supreme Court's 1992 judgment mandated a 27% reservation for OBCs in civil service positions and upheld the 'creamy layer' principle.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the impact of the Supreme Court's 1992 decision regarding OBC reservations?: The Supreme Court's 1992 decision resulted in a requirement for 27% of civil service positions to be reserved for members of OBCs.
  • What legal principle was established by the Supreme Court regarding the 'creamy layer' in the Indra Sawhney judgment?: The Supreme Court, in the Indra Sawhney judgment of 1992, established the principle of 'creamy layer' exclusion, meaning that the most advanced members within a backward class should not benefit from reservation policies. This was intended to ensure that affirmative action benefits reach the truly disadvantaged sections of society.
  • What were some key conclusions from the Supreme Court's ruling in the Ashoka Kumar Thakur vs. Union of India case regarding reservations?: The court concluded that the Constitution (Ninety-Third Amendment) Act, 2006, was valid for state-maintained and aided institutions but left the validity for private unaided institutions open. It affirmed that the 'creamy layer' principle is applicable to OBCs but not SCs/STs, recommended periodic reviews of reservation policies, and suggested that technical graduation or professional courses might be considered educationally forward. The court also advised the government to consider cut-off marks for OBC candidates to balance reservation with merit.

What is the 'creamy layer' concept designed to do within the context of OBC reservations?

Answer: Exclude the socially and economically advanced members within OBCs.

The 'creamy layer' concept aims to exclude individuals from OBC communities who have attained a certain level of social and economic advancement, ensuring that reservation benefits are directed towards the truly disadvantaged.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'creamy layer' concept in the context of OBC reservations?: The 'creamy layer' refers to the socially and economically advanced members within a backward class who are excluded from reservation benefits. This concept was first articulated by Justice Krishna Iyer and later upheld by the Supreme Court in the Indra Sawhney judgment to ensure that reservation benefits reach the truly disadvantaged sections.
  • What is the 'creamy layer' income bar, and how has it been adjusted over time?: The 'creamy layer' income bar is a financial threshold used to identify and exclude affluent individuals within Other Backward Classes (OBCs) from receiving reservation benefits. This threshold was initially set at ₹100,000 in 1993 and has been progressively increased to ₹800,000 annually by August 2017, reflecting adjustments for inflation and economic changes.
  • What did the Supreme Court conclude about the application of the 'creamy layer' principle to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs)?: The Supreme Court concluded that the 'creamy layer' principle, which excludes the affluent sections of a group from reservation benefits, is primarily applicable to Other Backward Classes (OBCs). It is not applicable to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) because they are considered distinct classes in themselves, not subject to the same internal socio-economic stratification that necessitates the 'creamy layer' exclusion.

Which landmark Supreme Court case upheld the 50% reservation ceiling and introduced the 'creamy layer' principle for OBCs?

Answer: Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India

The Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India case in 1992 was pivotal in upholding the 50% reservation ceiling and establishing the 'creamy layer' principle for OBCs.

Related Concepts:

  • What did the Supreme Court conclude about the application of the 'creamy layer' principle to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs)?: The Supreme Court concluded that the 'creamy layer' principle, which excludes the affluent sections of a group from reservation benefits, is primarily applicable to Other Backward Classes (OBCs). It is not applicable to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) because they are considered distinct classes in themselves, not subject to the same internal socio-economic stratification that necessitates the 'creamy layer' exclusion.
  • What was the Supreme Court's final verdict in April 2008 regarding the 27% OBC quota?: In April 2008, the Supreme Court upheld the government's initiative for 27% OBC quotas in government-funded institutions, reiterating that the 'creamy layer' must be excluded from these reservations.
  • What was the significance of the Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India judgment in 1992 regarding reservations?: The Indra Sawhney judgment upheld the 50% ceiling on reservations, emphasized the concept of 'social backwardness,' and introduced the 'creamy layer' principle for excluding the affluent sections within OBCs from reservation benefits. It also laid down 11 indicators for ascertaining backwardness.

How was the income threshold for the 'creamy layer' adjusted by August 2017?

Answer: Increased to ₹800,000 annually

By August 2017, the income threshold for the 'creamy layer' exclusion had been raised to ₹800,000 annually.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'creamy layer' income bar, and how has it been adjusted over time?: The 'creamy layer' income bar is a financial threshold used to identify and exclude affluent individuals within Other Backward Classes (OBCs) from receiving reservation benefits. This threshold was initially set at ₹100,000 in 1993 and has been progressively increased to ₹800,000 annually by August 2017, reflecting adjustments for inflation and economic changes.
  • How has the income threshold for the 'creamy layer' been revised over the years?: The 'creamy layer' criteria were initially set at ₹100,000 in 1993 and have been revised multiple times, increasing to ₹250,000 in 2004, ₹450,000 in 2008, ₹600,000 in 2013, and further to ₹800,000 in August 2017.
  • What is the 'creamy layer' concept in the context of OBC reservations?: The 'creamy layer' refers to the socially and economically advanced members within a backward class who are excluded from reservation benefits. This concept was first articulated by Justice Krishna Iyer and later upheld by the Supreme Court in the Indra Sawhney judgment to ensure that reservation benefits reach the truly disadvantaged sections.

In the Ashoka Kumar Thakur vs. Union of India case, what was the court's conclusion regarding the 'creamy layer' principle?

Answer: It was applicable to OBCs but not SCs/STs.

The court concluded that the 'creamy layer' principle was applicable to OBCs but not to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs).

Related Concepts:

  • What did the Supreme Court conclude about the application of the 'creamy layer' principle to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs)?: The Supreme Court concluded that the 'creamy layer' principle, which excludes the affluent sections of a group from reservation benefits, is primarily applicable to Other Backward Classes (OBCs). It is not applicable to Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) because they are considered distinct classes in themselves, not subject to the same internal socio-economic stratification that necessitates the 'creamy layer' exclusion.
  • What is the 'creamy layer' concept in the context of OBC reservations?: The 'creamy layer' refers to the socially and economically advanced members within a backward class who are excluded from reservation benefits. This concept was first articulated by Justice Krishna Iyer and later upheld by the Supreme Court in the Indra Sawhney judgment to ensure that reservation benefits reach the truly disadvantaged sections.
  • What legal principle was established by the Supreme Court regarding the 'creamy layer' in the Indra Sawhney judgment?: The Supreme Court, in the Indra Sawhney judgment of 1992, established the principle of 'creamy layer' exclusion, meaning that the most advanced members within a backward class should not benefit from reservation policies. This was intended to ensure that affirmative action benefits reach the truly disadvantaged sections of society.

Reservation Implementation and Challenges

OBCs are entitled to a 20% reservation in public sector employment and higher education in India.

Answer: False

The mandated reservation percentage for OBCs in public sector employment and higher education is 27%, not 20%.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the reservation percentage for OBCs in public sector employment and higher education in India?: OBCs are entitled to a 27% reservation in public sector employment and higher education as mandated by government policy.

As of January 2016, OBCs held approximately 21.57% of positions in central government services.

Answer: True

Data from January 2016 indicates that OBCs occupied 21.57% of positions within central government services.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the percentage of OBCs in central government services as of January 2016, and what trend was observed?: As of January 2016, OBCs constituted 21.57% of central government services, and this percentage had shown an increasing trend since September 1993.

The Ministry of Home Affairs has always been responsible for matters concerning OBCs since India's independence.

Answer: False

Responsibility for OBC matters initially lay with the Ministry of Home Affairs but was later transferred to the Ministry of Welfare, subsequently renamed the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment.

Related Concepts:

  • Which ministry in the Indian government is responsible for matters relating to OBCs?: Until 1985, the Ministry of Home Affairs handled matters concerning Backward Classes. Subsequently, a separate Ministry of Welfare was established, which was later renamed the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, and this ministry now oversees policies and programs for OBCs.

In 2007, the Supreme Court stayed the 27% OBC reservation in IITs and IIMs, questioning the reliance on the 1931 census.

Answer: True

The Supreme Court issued an interim stay in 2007 on the 27% OBC reservation in institutions like IITs and IIMs, expressing concerns about the reliance on historical census data.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Supreme Court's interim measure regarding OBC reservations in IITs and IIMs in March 2007?: In March 2007, the Supreme Court of India, as an interim measure, stayed the law providing 27% reservation for OBCs in institutions like IITs and IIMs, questioning the reliance on the 1931 census and stating that reservation should not perpetuate backwardness.

The Supreme Court ultimately rejected the government's initiative for 27% OBC quotas in government-funded institutions in 2008.

Answer: False

In 2008, the Supreme Court upheld the government's initiative for 27% OBC quotas in government-funded institutions, reiterating the necessity of excluding the 'creamy layer'.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Supreme Court's final verdict in April 2008 regarding the 27% OBC quota?: In April 2008, the Supreme Court upheld the government's initiative for 27% OBC quotas in government-funded institutions, reiterating that the 'creamy layer' must be excluded from these reservations.

In 2015, the Supreme Court upheld Jat reservations in the Central OBC list, citing their historical backwardness.

Answer: False

In March 2015, the Supreme Court scrapped Jat reservations in the Central OBC list, citing the National Commission for Backward Classes' opinion that Jats were not socially and economically backward.

Related Concepts:

  • When and why did the Supreme Court scrap Jat reservations in the Central OBC list?: In March 2015, the Supreme Court scrapped Jat reservations in the Central OBC list, stating that Jats were not socially and economically backward according to the National Commission for Backward Classes' opinion. The court also noted that Jats were already given OBC status in nine states, questioning the need for central inclusion.

Central and state lists of OBCs always align perfectly, with no discrepancies.

Answer: False

Central and state lists of OBCs often exhibit discrepancies, with communities recognized nationally not always being recognized in specific states or regions.

Related Concepts:

  • How do central and state lists of OBCs sometimes differ?: The central list of OBCs, maintained by the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC), does not always reflect the state lists, which can vary significantly. A community listed as a nationally recognized OBC might only be recognized in specific states or even in limited areas within those states.

The Supreme Court suggested that reservation policies should be permanent and not subject to periodic review.

Answer: False

The Supreme Court suggested that reservation policies should not be permanent and should be subject to periodic review to avoid perpetuating backwardness.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Supreme Court's stance on the permanence of reservation policies?: The Supreme Court observed that reservation cannot be permanent and should not be used in a way that perpetuates backwardness. This suggests a need for periodic review and potential phasing out of reservation policies as societal conditions change and target groups achieve greater equality.

The National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) is responsible for maintaining the central list of OBCs.

Answer: True

The National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) is tasked with maintaining the central list of OBCs and considering requests for additions or deletions.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the role of the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC)?: The National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) is responsible for maintaining the central list of OBCs and considering requests for inclusion or exclusion of communities from this list. It also advises the government on matters related to the social and educational advancement of OBCs.

What is the mandated reservation percentage for OBCs in public sector employment and higher education in India?

Answer: 27%

The government mandates a 27% reservation for OBCs in public sector employment and higher education.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the reservation percentage for OBCs in public sector employment and higher education in India?: OBCs are entitled to a 27% reservation in public sector employment and higher education as mandated by government policy.
  • How are OBCs referred to in the Indian Constitution, and what obligation does the government have towards them?: In the Indian Constitution, OBCs are described as socially and educationally backward classes (SEBC). The Government of India is enjoined by the Constitution to ensure their social and educational development, which includes providing reservations.
  • What was the percentage of OBCs in central government services as of January 2016, and what trend was observed?: As of January 2016, OBCs constituted 21.57% of central government services, and this percentage had shown an increasing trend since September 1993.

Which ministry in the Indian government is currently responsible for matters relating to OBCs?

Answer: Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment

The Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment is currently responsible for matters concerning OBCs.

Related Concepts:

  • Which ministry in the Indian government is responsible for matters relating to OBCs?: Until 1985, the Ministry of Home Affairs handled matters concerning Backward Classes. Subsequently, a separate Ministry of Welfare was established, which was later renamed the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, and this ministry now oversees policies and programs for OBCs.
  • How are OBCs referred to in the Indian Constitution, and what obligation does the government have towards them?: In the Indian Constitution, OBCs are described as socially and educationally backward classes (SEBC). The Government of India is enjoined by the Constitution to ensure their social and educational development, which includes providing reservations.
  • What is the role of the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC)?: The National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) is responsible for maintaining the central list of OBCs and considering requests for inclusion or exclusion of communities from this list. It also advises the government on matters related to the social and educational advancement of OBCs.

What concern did the Supreme Court raise in its 2007 interim measure regarding OBC reservations in institutions like IITs and IIMs?

Answer: Reliance on the 1931 census data.

In its 2007 interim measure concerning OBC reservations in institutions like IITs and IIMs, the Supreme Court questioned the reliance on the 1931 census data.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Supreme Court's interim measure regarding OBC reservations in IITs and IIMs in March 2007?: In March 2007, the Supreme Court of India, as an interim measure, stayed the law providing 27% reservation for OBCs in institutions like IITs and IIMs, questioning the reliance on the 1931 census and stating that reservation should not perpetuate backwardness.

Why did the Supreme Court scrap Jat reservations in the Central OBC list in March 2015?

Answer: The National Commission for Backward Classes opined that Jats were not socially and economically backward.

The Supreme Court scrapped Jat reservations in the Central OBC list in March 2015, citing the National Commission for Backward Classes' opinion that Jats did not meet the criteria for social and economic backwardness.

Related Concepts:

  • When and why did the Supreme Court scrap Jat reservations in the Central OBC list?: In March 2015, the Supreme Court scrapped Jat reservations in the Central OBC list, stating that Jats were not socially and economically backward according to the National Commission for Backward Classes' opinion. The court also noted that Jats were already given OBC status in nine states, questioning the need for central inclusion.

The Supreme Court suggested that reservation policies should not be used in a way that perpetuates what?

Answer: Backwardness

The Supreme Court suggested that reservation policies should not be utilized in a manner that perpetuates backwardness.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the Supreme Court's stance on the permanence of reservation policies?: The Supreme Court observed that reservation cannot be permanent and should not be used in a way that perpetuates backwardness. This suggests a need for periodic review and potential phasing out of reservation policies as societal conditions change and target groups achieve greater equality.

What is the function of the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC)?

Answer: To maintain the central list of OBCs and consider inclusions/exclusions.

The National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) is responsible for maintaining the central list of OBCs and processing requests for their inclusion or exclusion.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the role of the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC)?: The National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) is responsible for maintaining the central list of OBCs and considering requests for inclusion or exclusion of communities from this list. It also advises the government on matters related to the social and educational advancement of OBCs.
  • What does Article 340 of the Indian Constitution state about the government's role concerning socially and educationally backward classes?: Article 340 of the Indian Constitution mandates that the President may appoint a commission to investigate the conditions of socially and educationally backward classes (SEBC) within India, identify their difficulties, and make recommendations for steps to improve their situation and provide necessary grants.

Contemporary Caste Surveys and Commissions

Maharashtra had the highest number of OBC castes listed in the Central OBC list as of 2023.

Answer: True

As of 2023, Maharashtra lists the highest number of OBC castes within the Central OBC list, followed by Odisha, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu.

Related Concepts:

  • Which states have the highest number of OBC castes listed in the Central OBC list as of 2023?: As of 2023, Maharashtra has the highest number of OBC castes listed under the Central List, followed by Odisha, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu.

The total number of castes included in the Central OBC list across India is less than 1,000.

Answer: False

The Central OBC list includes a total of 2,633 castes across India as of 2023.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the total number of castes included in the Central OBC list across India?: As of 2023, the Central OBC list includes a total of 2,633 castes across India.

The Karnataka State Government has granted OBC reservation benefits to certain Christian communities.

Answer: True

The Karnataka State Government has extended OBC reservation benefits to various Christian communities, including Kuruba Christian and Madiga Christian.

Related Concepts:

  • Which state government has granted OBC reservation benefits to various Christian communities, and which ones?: The Karnataka State Government has granted OBC reservation benefits to several Christian communities, including Brahmin Christian, Kuruba Christian, Madiga Christian, Akkasali Christian, Sudri Christian, Scheduled Caste converted to Christianity, Setty Balija Christian, Nekara Christian, Paravar Christian, and Lambani Christian.

No Brahmin or priestly communities are listed under the OBC category in India.

Answer: False

Several Brahmin and priestly communities, such as Rajapur Saraswat Brahmins and Bhargava Dakaut Brahmins, are listed under the OBC category in various states.

Related Concepts:

  • Which Brahmin and priestly communities are listed as OBC in India?: Several Brahmin and priestly communities are listed as OBC, including Rajapur Saraswat Brahmins in Maharashtra, Kerala, and Karnataka; Bhargava Dakaut or Joshi Brahmins in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab, and Delhi; Kattaha Brahmins in Rajasthan; Saurashtra Brahmins in Tamil Nadu and Kerala; Goswami, Nath, Jogi, Yogi, and Giri Brahmins in various states; Dhiman and Jangid Brahmins in Chandigarh, Delhi, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, and Uttarakhand; Bairagi in multiple northern states; and Gurav or Shaiva Brahmins in Maharashtra.

Telangana's 2014 survey indicated that Backward Castes (BCs) constituted the largest demographic group in the state.

Answer: True

Telangana's 2014 Samagra Kutumba Survey found that Backward Castes (BCs) comprised 51% of the state's population, making them the largest demographic group.

Related Concepts:

  • What information did Telangana's Samagra Kutumba Survey 2014 reveal about the state's population demographics?: Telangana's Samagra Kutumba Survey in 2014 indicated that Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) constituted approximately 18.48% and 11.74% of the population, respectively. Backward Castes (BCs) made up 51% of the population, while other castes and religious minorities accounted for 16.03% and 10.65%, respectively. However, the findings were not publicly released due to legal challenges.

The Karnataka Caste Census 2015 report has been publicly released and widely accepted without controversy.

Answer: False

The Karnataka Caste Census 2015 report remained unpublished for years due to controversy and allegations of political pressure, though the state government decided to accept it in June 2023.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the current status of the Karnataka Caste Census 2015, and what controversy surrounds it?: As of 2023, the Karnataka Caste Census 2015 report remains unpublished, despite being ordered in 2014. Controversy surrounds the delay, with allegations of political pressure and concerns that the data might reveal lower populations for dominant communities like Lingayats and Vokkaligas, and a larger Dalit demographic, potentially altering the state's power dynamics. In June 2023, the state government decided to accept the report.

The Uttarakhand OBC Survey has faced issues with accuracy and delays, leading to cancelled surveys in some districts.

Answer: True

The Uttarakhand OBC Survey has encountered problems with accuracy and significant delays, resulting in the cancellation of flawed surveys in certain districts and repeated deadline extensions.

Related Concepts:

  • What issues have plagued the Uttarakhand OBC Survey, and what actions have been taken?: The Uttarakhand OBC Survey has faced significant delays and accuracy issues, including reliance on outdated data instead of new surveys. In response, the commission has cancelled flawed surveys in certain districts, ordered redos, and transferred responsible officers. Despite these measures, the survey's completion has been repeatedly extended, with the latest deadline set for June 2023.

Bihar's 2022 caste survey found that Extremely Backward Classes (EBCs) and OBCs combined represent over 60% of the state's population.

Answer: True

Bihar's 2022 caste survey revealed that Extremely Backward Classes (EBCs) and Other Backward Classes (OBCs) together constitute 63% of the state's population.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the key findings of the 2022 Bihar caste-based survey regarding the population distribution?: The first report of the 2022 Bihar caste-based survey, released on October 2, 2023, revealed that Extremely Backward Classes (EBCs) constitute 36.01% of the state's population. Combined with other Backward Classes (OBCs), they represent 63% of Bihar's total population. Following this, the Bihar Assembly passed bills to increase the reservation quota to 65%.

The Odisha Backward Classes Survey 2023 aims to assess the social and educational conditions of state-notified Backward Classes (SEBCs).

Answer: True

The Odisha Backward Classes Survey 2023 is intended to evaluate the social and educational status of state-notified Backward Classes (SEBCs).

Related Concepts:

  • What is the purpose of the Odisha Backward Classes Survey 2023?: The Odisha Backward Classes Survey 2023, initiated on May 1, 2023, aims to evaluate the social and educational conditions of state-notified Backward Classes (SEBCs). It collects data on factors like occupation and educational qualifications to assess backwardness and is expected to conclude by June 29, 2023, with data publication following thereafter.

The Rohini Commission's report focused on the equitable distribution of reservation benefits among OBC castes.

Answer: True

The Rohini Commission's report, submitted in July 2023, examined the equitable distribution of reservation benefits among the various castes listed under the Central OBC list.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the purpose of the Rohini Commission's report submitted in July 2023?: The Rohini Commission's report, submitted in July 2023 after numerous extensions, was tasked with examining the equitable distribution of reservation benefits among various castes within the Central OBC list. It aimed to propose mechanisms for sub-categorization and update the list of OBC castes, with the report being over 1,000 pages long and divided into two parts detailing allocation methods and an updated caste list.

Which state had the highest number of OBC castes listed in the Central OBC list as of 2023?

Answer: Maharashtra

As of 2023, Maharashtra lists the highest number of OBC castes in the Central OBC list.

Related Concepts:

  • Which states have the highest number of OBC castes listed in the Central OBC list as of 2023?: As of 2023, Maharashtra has the highest number of OBC castes listed under the Central List, followed by Odisha, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu.
  • What is the total number of castes included in the Central OBC list across India?: As of 2023, the Central OBC list includes a total of 2,633 castes across India.

What is the total approximate number of castes included in the Central OBC list across India as of 2023?

Answer: Around 2,633

The Central OBC list comprises approximately 2,633 castes across India as of 2023.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the total number of castes included in the Central OBC list across India?: As of 2023, the Central OBC list includes a total of 2,633 castes across India.
  • Which states have the highest number of OBC castes listed in the Central OBC list as of 2023?: As of 2023, Maharashtra has the highest number of OBC castes listed under the Central List, followed by Odisha, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu.
  • How do central and state lists of OBCs sometimes differ?: The central list of OBCs, maintained by the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC), does not always reflect the state lists, which can vary significantly. A community listed as a nationally recognized OBC might only be recognized in specific states or even in limited areas within those states.

Which state government has recently granted OBC reservation benefits to several Christian communities, and which ones?

Answer: Karnataka

The Karnataka State Government has granted OBC reservation benefits to various Christian communities, including Kuruba Christian and Madiga Christian.

Related Concepts:

  • Which state government has granted OBC reservation benefits to various Christian communities, and which ones?: The Karnataka State Government has granted OBC reservation benefits to several Christian communities, including Brahmin Christian, Kuruba Christian, Madiga Christian, Akkasali Christian, Sudri Christian, Scheduled Caste converted to Christianity, Setty Balija Christian, Nekara Christian, Paravar Christian, and Lambani Christian.

Which of the following is an example of a Brahmin community listed as OBC in India?

Answer: Rajapur Saraswat Brahmins

Rajapur Saraswat Brahmins are among the Brahmin communities listed as OBC in India, particularly in states like Maharashtra, Kerala, and Karnataka.

Related Concepts:

  • Which Brahmin and priestly communities are listed as OBC in India?: Several Brahmin and priestly communities are listed as OBC, including Rajapur Saraswat Brahmins in Maharashtra, Kerala, and Karnataka; Bhargava Dakaut or Joshi Brahmins in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab, and Delhi; Kattaha Brahmins in Rajasthan; Saurashtra Brahmins in Tamil Nadu and Kerala; Goswami, Nath, Jogi, Yogi, and Giri Brahmins in various states; Dhiman and Jangid Brahmins in Chandigarh, Delhi, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, and Uttarakhand; Bairagi in multiple northern states; and Gurav or Shaiva Brahmins in Maharashtra.
  • How do central and state lists of OBCs sometimes differ?: The central list of OBCs, maintained by the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC), does not always reflect the state lists, which can vary significantly. A community listed as a nationally recognized OBC might only be recognized in specific states or even in limited areas within those states.
  • What is the definition of 'Other Backward Class' (OBC) as used by the Government of India?: The Government of India uses the term 'Other Backward Class' (OBC) to classify communities that are identified as 'educationally or socially backward,' meaning they are disadvantaged. This classification is one of several official categories for the population of India, alongside general castes and Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (SCs and STs).

Telangana's 2014 Samagra Kutumba Survey indicated that Backward Castes (BCs) constituted what percentage of the population?

Answer: 51%

Telangana's 2014 Samagra Kutumba Survey indicated that Backward Castes (BCs) constituted 51% of the state's population.

Related Concepts:

  • What information did Telangana's Samagra Kutumba Survey 2014 reveal about the state's population demographics?: Telangana's Samagra Kutumba Survey in 2014 indicated that Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) constituted approximately 18.48% and 11.74% of the population, respectively. Backward Castes (BCs) made up 51% of the population, while other castes and religious minorities accounted for 16.03% and 10.65%, respectively. However, the findings were not publicly released due to legal challenges.

What issue has delayed the publication of the Karnataka Caste Census 2015 report?

Answer: Allegations of political pressure and potential impact on power dynamics.

The Karnataka Caste Census 2015 report faced delays due to controversy, including allegations of political pressure and concerns about its potential impact on power dynamics.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the current status of the Karnataka Caste Census 2015, and what controversy surrounds it?: As of 2023, the Karnataka Caste Census 2015 report remains unpublished, despite being ordered in 2014. Controversy surrounds the delay, with allegations of political pressure and concerns that the data might reveal lower populations for dominant communities like Lingayats and Vokkaligas, and a larger Dalit demographic, potentially altering the state's power dynamics. In June 2023, the state government decided to accept the report.

What was the key finding of Bihar's 2022 caste-based survey regarding the combined population of EBCs and OBCs?

Answer: They represented 63% of the population.

Bihar's 2022 caste survey found that Extremely Backward Classes (EBCs) and Other Backward Classes (OBCs) combined represent 63% of the state's population.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the key findings of the 2022 Bihar caste-based survey regarding the population distribution?: The first report of the 2022 Bihar caste-based survey, released on October 2, 2023, revealed that Extremely Backward Classes (EBCs) constitute 36.01% of the state's population. Combined with other Backward Classes (OBCs), they represent 63% of Bihar's total population. Following this, the Bihar Assembly passed bills to increase the reservation quota to 65%.

What is the stated aim of the Odisha Backward Classes Survey 2023?

Answer: To evaluate the social and educational conditions of state-notified Backward Classes (SEBCs).

The Odisha Backward Classes Survey 2023 aims to assess the social and educational conditions of state-notified Backward Classes (SEBCs).

Related Concepts:

  • What is the purpose of the Odisha Backward Classes Survey 2023?: The Odisha Backward Classes Survey 2023, initiated on May 1, 2023, aims to evaluate the social and educational conditions of state-notified Backward Classes (SEBCs). It collects data on factors like occupation and educational qualifications to assess backwardness and is expected to conclude by June 29, 2023, with data publication following thereafter.

What was the purpose of the Rohini Commission's report submitted in July 2023?

Answer: To examine the equitable distribution of reservation benefits among OBC castes.

The Rohini Commission's report aimed to examine the equitable distribution of reservation benefits among the various castes included in the Central OBC list.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the purpose of the Rohini Commission's report submitted in July 2023?: The Rohini Commission's report, submitted in July 2023 after numerous extensions, was tasked with examining the equitable distribution of reservation benefits among various castes within the Central OBC list. It aimed to propose mechanisms for sub-categorization and update the list of OBC castes, with the report being over 1,000 pages long and divided into two parts detailing allocation methods and an updated caste list.

Social Mobility and Historical Context

Prior to reservation policies, all OBC communities experienced similar levels of socio-economic backwardness.

Answer: False

Significant socio-economic disparities existed among OBC communities prior to reservation policies; some were highly backward, while others owned substantial land and employed labor.

Related Concepts:

  • What socio-economic disparity existed among OBC communities prior to reservation policies?: Even before the implementation of reservation policies, there was a significant disparity among OBC communities. While many were extremely backward, some owned substantial land and employed Scheduled Castes (SCs) as agricultural laborers.

The abolition of the Zamindari system and the Green Revolution primarily benefited Scheduled Castes in North India.

Answer: False

These reforms primarily benefited dominant OBC communities such as Yadavs, Kurmis, and Koeris in North India, enhancing their landholdings and socio-economic status.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the abolition of the Zamindari system and the Green Revolution affect certain OBC communities in North India?: The abolition of the Zamindari system elevated many members of communities like Yadavs, Kurmis, and Koeris to landlord status. The Green Revolution further increased their landholdings and economic prosperity, leading them to pursue education and secure government jobs, thereby improving their socio-economic profile.

The 1968 Socio-Economic Survey of Kerala found that lower castes generally possessed more land than higher castes.

Answer: False

The 1968 Kerala survey indicated that higher castes generally possessed more land and had higher per capita incomes compared to lower castes.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the 1968 Socio-Economic Survey of Kerala regarding caste inequalities?: The 1968 Socio-Economic Survey of Kerala, ordered by E. M. S. Namboodiripad, was the only caste-based count conducted in post-independence India until 2011. It found that higher castes generally possessed more land and had higher per capita incomes compared to the general population, with specific percentages of Brahmins, Syrian Christians, Jacobites, and Nairs owning more than 5 acres of land, contrasting with lower percentages for Ezhavas, Muslims, and Scheduled Castes.

The 'Namantar Andolan' was a movement focused on economic reforms for backward classes.

Answer: False

The 'Namantar Andolan' was primarily a movement focused on challenging caste discrimination and advocating for the renaming of institutions and places.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Namantar Andolan' mentioned in the context of caste-related movements?: The 'Namantar Andolan' (Name-Changing Movement) was a significant social movement in India, particularly associated with challenging caste-based discrimination and advocating for the renaming of institutions or places to reflect a more inclusive and equitable history, often linked to the legacy of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar.

The Poona Pact, signed by B.R. Ambedkar and Gandhi, proposed separate electorates for depressed classes.

Answer: False

The Poona Pact, signed by B.R. Ambedkar and Mahatma Gandhi, retained a joint electorate while reserving seats for the depressed classes, in contrast to the Communal Award's proposal for separate electorates.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the 'Communal Award' and the 'Poona Pact' in the history of caste and reservation in India?: The Communal Award, announced by the British Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald in 1932, proposed separate electorates for depressed classes (Dalits). Mahatma Gandhi opposed this, leading to the Poona Pact, which was signed by B.R. Ambedkar and Gandhi. The Poona Pact retained a joint electorate but reserved seats for the depressed classes within the general electorate, marking a crucial moment in the negotiation of rights for marginalized communities.

Sanskritisation refers to the process where lower-caste groups adopt the customs of higher castes to improve social status.

Answer: True

Sanskritisation describes the process by which lower-caste groups emulate the practices and rituals of higher castes to elevate their social standing within the caste hierarchy.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'Sanskritisation' refer to in the context of social mobility in India?: Sanskritisation is a process described by sociologist M.N. Srinivas, where lower-caste groups adopt the customs, rituals, and beliefs of higher castes, particularly Brahmins, to improve their social status and move up the caste hierarchy. In the context of OBC political ascendancy, it can refer to dominant OBC groups claiming higher ritual status or adopting practices associated with traditionally higher castes.

Which of the following OBC communities saw improved socio-economic status due to the abolition of the Zamindari system and the Green Revolution in North India?

Answer: Yadavs, Kurmis, and Koeris

The abolition of the Zamindari system and the Green Revolution significantly improved the socio-economic status of communities like Yadavs, Kurmis, and Koeris in North India.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the abolition of the Zamindari system and the Green Revolution affect certain OBC communities in North India?: The abolition of the Zamindari system elevated many members of communities like Yadavs, Kurmis, and Koeris to landlord status. The Green Revolution further increased their landholdings and economic prosperity, leading them to pursue education and secure government jobs, thereby improving their socio-economic profile.

The group 'Lodhi Rajputs' is classified as OBC in several northern states but is considered what elsewhere?

Answer: Forward Caste

While classified as OBC in several northern states, the Lodhi Rajputs are considered a Forward Caste in other regions.

Related Concepts:

  • How do central and state lists of OBCs sometimes differ?: The central list of OBCs, maintained by the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC), does not always reflect the state lists, which can vary significantly. A community listed as a nationally recognized OBC might only be recognized in specific states or even in limited areas within those states.
  • Which politically important social groups are listed as OBC in various states and the national list?: Groups like Koli people are listed as OBC in national and state lists of Goa, Gujarat, Daman and Diu, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Karnataka, and Maharashtra. Rajputs are listed in the national and state OBC lists of Karnataka. Lodhi Rajputs are OBC in several northern states but considered Forward Caste elsewhere. Bishnoi/Vishnoi are on the OBC list in Rajasthan, and Goldsmiths/Sunar are listed in Rajasthan's central and state OBC lists. Khatris are on the national and state OBC lists of Tamil Nadu. The Aras (Urs) community of the Mysore Wodeyars is listed in Karnataka, Kathis in Gujarat's central list, Ezhava in Kerala's state list, Ahoms on the central list, and Jats are on state lists in several northern states, with specific Jats from Rajasthan eligible for central OBC reservations.

What did the 1968 Socio-Economic Survey of Kerala reveal about land ownership concerning caste?

Answer: Higher castes generally possessed more land compared to the general population.

The 1968 Socio-Economic Survey of Kerala found that higher castes generally possessed more land and had higher per capita incomes than the general population.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the significance of the 1968 Socio-Economic Survey of Kerala regarding caste inequalities?: The 1968 Socio-Economic Survey of Kerala, ordered by E. M. S. Namboodiripad, was the only caste-based count conducted in post-independence India until 2011. It found that higher castes generally possessed more land and had higher per capita incomes compared to the general population, with specific percentages of Brahmins, Syrian Christians, Jacobites, and Nairs owning more than 5 acres of land, contrasting with lower percentages for Ezhavas, Muslims, and Scheduled Castes.

The 'Namantar Andolan' is primarily associated with which type of social activism?

Answer: Challenging caste discrimination and renaming institutions

The 'Namantar Andolan' was a significant social movement focused on challenging caste discrimination and advocating for the renaming of institutions and places.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Namantar Andolan' mentioned in the context of caste-related movements?: The 'Namantar Andolan' (Name-Changing Movement) was a significant social movement in India, particularly associated with challenging caste-based discrimination and advocating for the renaming of institutions or places to reflect a more inclusive and equitable history, often linked to the legacy of Dr. B. R. Ambedkar.

What critical agreement concerning the representation of depressed classes was signed by B.R. Ambedkar and Mahatma Gandhi?

Answer: The Poona Pact

The Poona Pact, signed by B.R. Ambedkar and Mahatma Gandhi, addressed the representation of depressed classes by retaining a joint electorate with reserved seats.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the 'Communal Award' and the 'Poona Pact' in the history of caste and reservation in India?: The Communal Award, announced by the British Prime Minister Ramsay MacDonald in 1932, proposed separate electorates for depressed classes (Dalits). Mahatma Gandhi opposed this, leading to the Poona Pact, which was signed by B.R. Ambedkar and Gandhi. The Poona Pact retained a joint electorate but reserved seats for the depressed classes within the general electorate, marking a crucial moment in the negotiation of rights for marginalized communities.

The process where lower-caste groups adopt the customs of higher castes to improve their social standing is known as:

Answer: Sanskritisation

The process described is known as Sanskritisation, where lower castes emulate the practices of higher castes to enhance their social status.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'Sanskritisation' refer to in the context of social mobility in India?: Sanskritisation is a process described by sociologist M.N. Srinivas, where lower-caste groups adopt the customs, rituals, and beliefs of higher castes, particularly Brahmins, to improve their social status and move up the caste hierarchy. In the context of OBC political ascendancy, it can refer to dominant OBC groups claiming higher ritual status or adopting practices associated with traditionally higher castes.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy