Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



Scorched Earth Tactics: A Historical Overview

At a Glance

Title: Scorched Earth Tactics: A Historical Overview

Total Categories: 6

Category Stats

  • Foundations of Scorched Earth: 11 flashcards, 18 questions
  • Medieval and Early Modern Applications: 14 flashcards, 28 questions
  • Napoleonic Era and 19th Century Conflicts: 11 flashcards, 21 questions
  • World Wars and 20th Century Conflicts: 14 flashcards, 30 questions
  • Modern Conflicts and Contemporary Issues: 5 flashcards, 12 questions
  • Figurative and Legal Dimensions: 4 flashcards, 6 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 59
  • True/False Questions: 60
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 55
  • Total Questions: 115

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Scorched Earth Tactics: A Historical Overview

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Scorched earth" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Scorched Earth Tactics: A Historical Overview

Study Guide: Scorched Earth Tactics: A Historical Overview

Foundations of Scorched Earth

A scorched-earth policy is fundamentally about destroying resources that could benefit an enemy force.

Answer: True

The core principle of a scorched-earth policy is the systematic destruction of resources, such as infrastructure, food, and water, to deny them to an opposing force and thereby weaken or impede their advance or occupation.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the fundamental definition of a scorched-earth policy?: A scorched-earth policy is a military strategy where an army destroys anything that could be useful to an enemy force. This includes destroying resources like water, food, animals, plants, tools, and infrastructure to weaken or deny them to the opposing side.
  • What are the two primary contexts in which a scorched-earth policy is employed by armies?: A scorched-earth policy can be used by a retreating army to leave nothing of value for the advancing enemy, or by an advancing army as a tactic against unconventional warfare.

Scorched-earth tactics are exclusively employed by retreating armies to deny resources to advancing enemies.

Answer: False

While often used by retreating armies, scorched-earth tactics can also be employed by advancing armies, particularly in counter-insurgency or when facing unconventional warfare, to deny resources and support networks to the enemy.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the two primary contexts in which a scorched-earth policy is employed by armies?: A scorched-earth policy can be used by a retreating army to leave nothing of value for the advancing enemy, or by an advancing army as a tactic against unconventional warfare.
  • What is the fundamental definition of a scorched-earth policy?: A scorched-earth policy is a military strategy where an army destroys anything that could be useful to an enemy force. This includes destroying resources like water, food, animals, plants, tools, and infrastructure to weaken or deny them to the opposing side.

The term 'scorched earth' was first documented in English reports concerning Napoleon's invasion of Russia in 1812.

Answer: False

The term 'scorched earth' was first documented in English in a 1937 report concerning the Second Sino-Japanese War, although similar tactics were employed much earlier, including during Napoleon's Russian campaign.

Related Concepts:

  • When and where was the term 'scorched earth' first found in English reports related to its military application?: The term 'scorched earth' was first found in English in a 1937 report concerning the Second Sino-Japanese War. During this conflict, retreating Chinese forces destroyed crops and infrastructure to hinder the logistics of the advancing Japanese army.
  • What did Clausewitz observe about the conditions faced by a pursuing army when a scorched-earth policy was implemented?: Clausewitz noted that when a retreating army employs scorched-earth tactics, the pursuing army often faces pressing wants from the very first day. This is because the retreating forces consume or destroy everything, leaving behind wasted villages, fields, empty wells, and muddy streams.

Carl von Clausewitz believed that making an enemy's subsistence difficult was a secondary objective in warfare, subordinate to direct battle.

Answer: False

Carl von Clausewitz considered making an enemy's subsistence difficult a primary objective, alongside direct battle, as it could lead to the enemy's disorganization and retreat, resulting in significant losses.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Carl von Clausewitz describe the strategic objective related to denying enemy subsistence?: Clausewitz wrote that in both defensive and offensive warfare, a primary aim is the destruction of the enemy army, either through battle or by making their subsistence extremely difficult. This disorganization and hardship can force a retreat, leading to significant enemy losses, as exemplified by Wellington's campaign in 1810-1811.
  • What did Clausewitz observe about the conditions faced by a pursuing army when a scorched-earth policy was implemented?: Clausewitz noted that when a retreating army employs scorched-earth tactics, the pursuing army often faces pressing wants from the very first day. This is because the retreating forces consume or destroy everything, leaving behind wasted villages, fields, empty wells, and muddy streams.

During Darius the Great's invasion, the Scythians successfully repelled the Persians by engaging them in direct, large-scale battles.

Answer: False

The Scythians evaded Darius the Great's army by retreating and simultaneously destroying resources and poisoning wells, rather than engaging in direct, large-scale battles.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Scythians employ scorched-earth tactics against Darius the Great's invasion?: During Darius the Great's European Scythian campaign, the nomadic Scythians evaded the Persian invaders by retreating into the steppes. They simultaneously destroyed food supplies and poisoned wells to deny resources to the Persian army.

Xenophon's account of the March of the Ten Thousand describes enemy forces burning crops and destroying useful items to hinder the Greek soldiers.

Answer: True

Xenophon's 'Anabasis' details how enemy forces, in an effort to impede the Ten Thousand, burned crops and destroyed other useful resources in their path.

Related Concepts:

  • What did Xenophon record about enemy tactics during the March of the Ten Thousand?: Xenophon, in his work 'Anabasis', recorded that the withdrawing enemy forces burned crops and destroyed anything else of use in front of the Ten Thousand. This was a tactic to deny resources to the advancing Greek soldiers.

During the Second Punic War in Italy, Roman forces under Quintus Fabius Maximus ordered the burning of grain supplies in areas not directly threatened by Hannibal's army.

Answer: False

Following the Battle of Lake Trasimene, Quintus Fabius Maximus ordered the inhabitants in Hannibal's path to burn their houses and grain, but this was in areas directly threatened by Hannibal's army, not those not threatened.

Related Concepts:

  • How was scorched earth used during the Second Punic War in Italy?: During Hannibal's invasion of Italy, both Carthaginian and Roman forces selectively used scorched-earth methods. After the Battle of Lake Trasimene, Quintus Fabius Maximus ordered the inhabitants in the path of Hannibal's army to burn their houses and grain.

Following the Third Punic War, the Roman Senate ordered the complete salting of Carthage's agricultural lands to prevent future cultivation.

Answer: False

While Carthage was destroyed after the Third Punic War, the story of the Roman Senate ordering the salting of its lands is considered apocryphal; the primary action was the demolition of its structures and scattering of stones.

Related Concepts:

  • What action did the Roman Senate take regarding Carthage after the Third Punic War?: Following the Third Punic War in 146 BCE, the Roman Senate ordered the permanent destruction of Carthage. Its buildings were demolished, stones scattered, and fields burned, though the story of salting the earth is considered apocryphal.

In the Gallic Wars, 'vastatio' referred to the systematic destruction of property and subjugation of people as part of military campaigns.

Answer: True

'Vastatio' in the context of the Gallic Wars described the punitive destruction of property and subjugation of populations, often involving the burning of resources and villages to hinder enemy movements or enforce compliance.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'vastatio' during the Gallic Wars?: During the Gallic Wars, 'vastatio' referred to the system of punitive destruction of property and subjugation of people that accompanied military campaigns. For instance, the Helvetii destroyed everything they couldn't carry to add incentive to their march, and Vercingetorix's forces ravaged the countryside to hinder Roman armies.

During Emperor Julian's invasion of Persia in 363 CE, the Persian inhabitants cooperated with the Roman army by providing ample resources.

Answer: False

During Emperor Julian's invasion, the Persian region between the Tigris and the mountains of Media implemented a scorched-earth policy, devastating the land and driving away resources to hinder the Roman army.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Roman Emperor Julian's invasion of Persia in 363 CE face a scorched-earth policy?: The Persian region between the Tigris River and the mountains of Media, which was well-cultivated, was devastated by a scorched-earth policy. On the approach of Julian's Roman army, the inhabitants drove away cattle, burned crops, and destroyed resources, leaving a 'smoking and naked desert' that severely hampered the Roman advance.

What is the primary objective of a scorched-earth policy?

Answer: To destroy resources that could benefit an enemy force.

The primary objective of a scorched-earth policy is to deny resources, such as food, water, shelter, and infrastructure, to an enemy force, thereby weakening their operational capacity or forcing their withdrawal.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the fundamental definition of a scorched-earth policy?: A scorched-earth policy is a military strategy where an army destroys anything that could be useful to an enemy force. This includes destroying resources like water, food, animals, plants, tools, and infrastructure to weaken or deny them to the opposing side.
  • What are the two primary contexts in which a scorched-earth policy is employed by armies?: A scorched-earth policy can be used by a retreating army to leave nothing of value for the advancing enemy, or by an advancing army as a tactic against unconventional warfare.

According to the source, in which two primary contexts are scorched-earth policies employed by armies?

Answer: Retreating armies and advancing armies against unconventional warfare.

Scorched-earth policies are primarily employed by retreating armies to deny resources to pursuers, or by advancing armies as a tactic against unconventional warfare, aiming to disrupt enemy support and resources.

Related Concepts:

  • What are the two primary contexts in which a scorched-earth policy is employed by armies?: A scorched-earth policy can be used by a retreating army to leave nothing of value for the advancing enemy, or by an advancing army as a tactic against unconventional warfare.
  • What is the fundamental definition of a scorched-earth policy?: A scorched-earth policy is a military strategy where an army destroys anything that could be useful to an enemy force. This includes destroying resources like water, food, animals, plants, tools, and infrastructure to weaken or deny them to the opposing side.

When was the term 'scorched earth' first documented in English reports related to its military application?

Answer: During the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937)

The term 'scorched earth' first appeared in English in a 1937 report concerning the Second Sino-Japanese War, detailing the destruction of resources by retreating Chinese forces.

Related Concepts:

  • When and where was the term 'scorched earth' first found in English reports related to its military application?: The term 'scorched earth' was first found in English in a 1937 report concerning the Second Sino-Japanese War. During this conflict, retreating Chinese forces destroyed crops and infrastructure to hinder the logistics of the advancing Japanese army.

How did Carl von Clausewitz describe the difficulty faced by a pursuing army when a scorched-earth policy was implemented by the retreating force?

Answer: The pursuing army would face pressing wants from the very first day.

Clausewitz observed that when a retreating army employed scorched-earth tactics, the pursuing army would face 'pressing wants from the very first day' due to the complete destruction of resources.

Related Concepts:

  • What did Clausewitz observe about the conditions faced by a pursuing army when a scorched-earth policy was implemented?: Clausewitz noted that when a retreating army employs scorched-earth tactics, the pursuing army often faces pressing wants from the very first day. This is because the retreating forces consume or destroy everything, leaving behind wasted villages, fields, empty wells, and muddy streams.
  • How did Carl von Clausewitz describe the strategic objective related to denying enemy subsistence?: Clausewitz wrote that in both defensive and offensive warfare, a primary aim is the destruction of the enemy army, either through battle or by making their subsistence extremely difficult. This disorganization and hardship can force a retreat, leading to significant enemy losses, as exemplified by Wellington's campaign in 1810-1811.

What tactic did the Scythians employ against Darius the Great's invasion to deny resources to the Persian army?

Answer: Destroying food supplies and poisoning wells.

The Scythians evaded Darius the Great's invasion by retreating and simultaneously destroying food supplies and poisoning wells, thereby denying essential resources to the Persian army.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Scythians employ scorched-earth tactics against Darius the Great's invasion?: During Darius the Great's European Scythian campaign, the nomadic Scythians evaded the Persian invaders by retreating into the steppes. They simultaneously destroyed food supplies and poisoned wells to deny resources to the Persian army.

What does Xenophon record about enemy tactics during the March of the Ten Thousand?

Answer: Enemy forces burned crops and destroyed useful items in front of the Ten Thousand.

Xenophon documented that enemy forces encountered during the March of the Ten Thousand burned crops and destroyed useful items to hinder the Greek soldiers' progress and sustenance.

Related Concepts:

  • What did Xenophon record about enemy tactics during the March of the Ten Thousand?: Xenophon, in his work 'Anabasis', recorded that the withdrawing enemy forces burned crops and destroyed anything else of use in front of the Ten Thousand. This was a tactic to deny resources to the advancing Greek soldiers.

What does the term 'vastatio' refer to in the context of the Gallic Wars?

Answer: The system of punitive destruction of property and subjugation of people.

In the Gallic Wars, 'vastatio' described the systematic destruction of property and subjugation of people, often involving the burning of resources and villages, as a military tactic.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'vastatio' during the Gallic Wars?: During the Gallic Wars, 'vastatio' referred to the system of punitive destruction of property and subjugation of people that accompanied military campaigns. For instance, the Helvetii destroyed everything they couldn't carry to add incentive to their march, and Vercingetorix's forces ravaged the countryside to hinder Roman armies.

How did the Persian region between the Tigris River and the mountains of Media react to Roman Emperor Julian's invasion in 363 CE?

Answer: They devastated the region with a scorched-earth policy.

The Persian inhabitants between the Tigris and the mountains of Media implemented a scorched-earth policy during Julian's invasion, destroying resources and driving away livestock to hinder the Roman army.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Roman Emperor Julian's invasion of Persia in 363 CE face a scorched-earth policy?: The Persian region between the Tigris River and the mountains of Media, which was well-cultivated, was devastated by a scorched-earth policy. On the approach of Julian's Roman army, the inhabitants drove away cattle, burned crops, and destroyed resources, leaving a 'smoking and naked desert' that severely hampered the Roman advance.

Medieval and Early Modern Applications

During the First Fitna, Muawiyah I's forces burned crops and homes of supporters of Ali ibn Abi Talib in the Hejaz and Yemen.

Answer: True

Historical accounts indicate that during the First Fitna, forces loyal to Muawiyah I engaged in scorched-earth tactics, including burning crops and homes of Ali's supporters in regions like the Hejaz and Yemen.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth actions were taken during the First Fitna in the 7th century CE?: During the First Fitna (656–661 CE), Muawiyah I dispatched forces, including Busr ibn Abi Artat, to ravage territory loyal to Ali ibn Abi Talib in the Hejaz and Yemen. Tabari estimates 30,000 civilians were killed, and Sufyan ibn Awf burned crops and homes of Ali's supporters in Iraq.

The Mercians countered Hastein's Viking invasion in 893 CE by offering him substantial supplies to encourage his departure.

Answer: False

The Mercians countered Hastein's Viking invasion by destroying crops and livestock in the surrounding countryside, effectively denying resources and forcing the Vikings to leave.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Mercians counter Hastein's Viking invasion in England in 893 CE?: When the Viking chieftain Hastein attempted to occupy Chester and raid Mercia, the Mercians responded by destroying all crops and livestock in the surrounding countryside. This action successfully expelled the Vikings.

The Harrying of the North by William the Conqueror resulted in the destruction of villages and the annihilation of food stores and livestock.

Answer: True

William the Conqueror's 'Harrying of the North' involved the systematic destruction of villages, crops, and livestock, leading to widespread famine and depopulation in northern England.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'Harrying of the North' and its impact?: The Harrying of the North, initiated by William the Conqueror in 1069 to quell a rebellion, involved the brutal destruction of villages and slaughter of inhabitants across northern England. Food stores and livestock were annihilated, leading to widespread starvation and, in some accounts, cannibalism among survivors. The region took centuries to recover, with an estimated 100,000 to 150,000 deaths.

During the Hundred Years' War, 'chevauchée' raids were primarily focused on capturing enemy castles and fortifications.

Answer: False

'Chevauchée' raids during the Hundred Years' War were primarily focused on devastating enemy territory, destroying infrastructure, and denying resources, rather than capturing fortifications.

Related Concepts:

  • How was scorched earth utilized during the Hundred Years' War?: During the Hundred Years' War, both English and French forces conducted 'chevauchée' raids, a form of scorched-earth tactic, across enemy territory. The objective was to damage infrastructure and deny resources to the opposing side.

Robert the Bruce advocated for a strategy of leaving scorched plains and maintaining large, open supply depots to thwart English invasions of Scotland.

Answer: False

Robert the Bruce advocated for a scorched-earth strategy that involved burning the plains and keeping supplies in fortified places, thereby creating a wasteland to impede invading armies, not maintaining open supply depots.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth strategy did Robert the Bruce advocate for Scotland?: According to a 14th-century poem, Robert the Bruce advised a scorched-earth strategy to thwart Edward I of England's invasion of Scotland. The plan involved burning the plains and keeping supplies in fortified places to create a wasteland that would impede the invading army.

'Slighting' refers to the deliberate destruction of fortifications to prevent their use by enemy forces.

Answer: True

'Slighting' is the practice of deliberately destroying fortifications, either partially or completely, to render them unusable by enemy forces, a tactic employed in various conflicts.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'slighting' in the context of fortifications, and when was it used?: Slighting is the deliberate destruction, partial or complete, of a fortification. It was used during the Wars of Scottish Independence and the English Civil War to render structures unusable as fortresses. Robert the Bruce, for example, slighted Scottish castles to prevent English occupation.
  • Describe Vlad the Impaler's scorched-earth tactics against Mehmed II in 1462.: When Mehmed II invaded Wallachia in 1462, Vlad the Impaler employed scorched-earth tactics. As he retreated, he destroyed resources and famously presented Mehmed's approaching army with a 'forest' of over 20,000 impaled bodies, a horrifying sight that contributed to Mehmed's withdrawal.

Stephen the Great used scorched-earth tactics in the Carpathians to lure the Ottoman Army into heavily supplied regions.

Answer: False

Stephen the Great employed scorched-earth tactics in the Carpathians against the Ottoman Army to deny resources and hinder their advance, not to lure them into supplied regions.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Stephen the Great employ scorched earth against the Ottoman Army?: Stephen the Great utilized scorched-earth tactics in the Carpathians against the Ottoman Army in 1475 and 1476. This strategy aimed to deny resources and hinder the advance of the invading Ottoman forces.

Vlad the Impaler's scorched-earth tactics against Mehmed II in 1462 involved poisoning the water supply of the entire Ottoman army.

Answer: False

Vlad the Impaler's scorched-earth tactics included destroying resources and famously presenting Mehmed II's army with a 'forest' of impaled bodies, but poisoning the entire army's water supply is not the primary described tactic.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe Vlad the Impaler's scorched-earth tactics against Mehmed II in 1462.: When Mehmed II invaded Wallachia in 1462, Vlad the Impaler employed scorched-earth tactics. As he retreated, he destroyed resources and famously presented Mehmed's approaching army with a 'forest' of over 20,000 impaled bodies, a horrifying sight that contributed to Mehmed's withdrawal.

During the Anglicisation of Ireland in the 16th century, English commanders like Walter Devereux laid waste to much of Munster, causing extreme hardship.

Answer: True

During the 16th century Anglicisation of Ireland, English commanders employed scorched-earth policies, particularly in Munster, leading to severe hardship and depopulation for the local Irish population.

Related Concepts:

  • How were scorched-earth policies used during the Anglicisation of Ireland in the 16th century?: In 16th century Ireland, English commanders like Walter Devereux and Richard Bingham employed scorched-earth policies, particularly during the Desmond Rebellions. Much of Munster was laid waste, leading to extreme hardship and depopulation, as vividly described by Edmund Spenser.

At the Great Siege of Malta in 1565, Grandmaster Jean Parisot de Valette ordered the Knights to poison all wells with fresh water to deny the Ottomans.

Answer: False

During the Great Siege of Malta, Grandmaster de Valette ordered the harvesting of all crops, including unripe grain, and the poisoning of wells with bitter herbs and dead animals to deny resources to the Ottoman attackers.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth measures were taken during the Great Siege of Malta in 1565?: During the Great Siege of Malta, Grandmaster Jean Parisot de Valette ordered the harvesting of all crops, including unripe grain, to deprive the attacking Ottomans of local food supplies. Additionally, the Knights poisoned wells with bitter herbs and dead animals.

Imperial General Torquato Conti, during the Thirty Years' War, ordered his troops to burn houses and destroy villages to deny resources to the Swedes.

Answer: True

Imperial General Torquato Conti, upon retreating during the Thirty Years' War, ordered his troops to burn houses, destroy villages, and generally harm property and people to deny resources to the Swedish army.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth actions did Torquato Conti order during the Thirty Years' War?: In 1630, during the Thirty Years' War, Imperial General Torquato Conti, retreating from the Swedish army, ordered his troops to burn houses, destroy villages, and generally harm property and people. This was done to deny resources to the Swedes and leave ruins behind.

The French scorched-earth policy in the Palatinate during the Nine Years' War involved systematically destroying towns like Heidelberg to prevent German invasion of France.

Answer: True

During the Nine Years' War, French forces implemented a scorched-earth policy in the Palatinate, systematically destroying towns and villages to deny resources to German allies and prevent French territory from being invaded.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the French scorched-earth policy in the Palatinate during the Nine Years' War?: In 1688, Louis XIV and Marquis de Louvois implemented a scorched-earth policy in the Palatinate, Baden, and Württemberg during the Nine Years' War. French troops systematically destroyed over 20 towns and numerous villages, including Heidelberg and Mannheim, to deny resources to German allies and prevent invasion of France.

Shivaji Maharaj's 'Ganimi Kava' tactics strictly prohibited looting Mughal traders and burning cities.

Answer: False

Shivaji Maharaj's 'Ganimi Kava' tactics involved looting Mughal traders and burning cities, but strictly prohibited harming civilians or disrespecting religious sites.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Shivaji Maharaj's forces utilize scorched-earth tactics in the Mughal–Maratha Wars?: Shivaji Maharaj introduced scorched-earth tactics known as 'Ganimi Kava'. His forces looted Mughal traders and burnt cities, but were strictly ordered not to harm civilians or disrespect religious sites. His son, Sambhaji Maharaj, also employed these tactics.

'Slighting' is a historical practice of deliberately destroying fortifications to prevent their reuse by an enemy.

Answer: True

'Slighting' refers to the deliberate destruction of fortifications to prevent their reuse by an enemy, a practice seen in various historical conflicts.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe Vlad the Impaler's scorched-earth tactics against Mehmed II in 1462.: When Mehmed II invaded Wallachia in 1462, Vlad the Impaler employed scorched-earth tactics. As he retreated, he destroyed resources and famously presented Mehmed's approaching army with a 'forest' of over 20,000 impaled bodies, a horrifying sight that contributed to Mehmed's withdrawal.
  • What historical event involved the deliberate destruction of fortifications to prevent their reuse?: The practice of 'slighting' involved the deliberate destruction of fortifications to prevent their reuse by an enemy. This occurred during conflicts like the Wars of Scottish Independence and the English Civil War, where castles were dismantled after capture or abandonment.

During the First Fitna, what scorched-earth actions did Sufyan ibn Awf take against supporters of Ali ibn Abi Talib?

Answer: He burned crops and homes.

During the First Fitna, forces associated with Muawiyah I, including Sufyan ibn Awf, reportedly burned crops and homes of Ali's supporters in regions like Iraq.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth actions were taken during the First Fitna in the 7th century CE?: During the First Fitna (656–661 CE), Muawiyah I dispatched forces, including Busr ibn Abi Artat, to ravage territory loyal to Ali ibn Abi Talib in the Hejaz and Yemen. Tabari estimates 30,000 civilians were killed, and Sufyan ibn Awf burned crops and homes of Ali's supporters in Iraq.

How did the Mercians effectively counter Hastein's Viking invasion in England in 893 CE?

Answer: By destroying crops and livestock in the surrounding countryside.

The Mercians countered Hastein's Viking invasion by destroying local crops and livestock, thereby denying the Vikings the resources they needed to sustain themselves.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Mercians counter Hastein's Viking invasion in England in 893 CE?: When the Viking chieftain Hastein attempted to occupy Chester and raid Mercia, the Mercians responded by destroying all crops and livestock in the surrounding countryside. This action successfully expelled the Vikings.

What was a significant consequence of William the Conqueror's 'Harrying of the North' in 1069?

Answer: Widespread starvation and depopulation.

William the Conqueror's 'Harrying of the North' resulted in the destruction of food stores and livestock, leading to widespread starvation, famine, and a significant depopulation of the region.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'Harrying of the North' and its impact?: The Harrying of the North, initiated by William the Conqueror in 1069 to quell a rebellion, involved the brutal destruction of villages and slaughter of inhabitants across northern England. Food stores and livestock were annihilated, leading to widespread starvation and, in some accounts, cannibalism among survivors. The region took centuries to recover, with an estimated 100,000 to 150,000 deaths.

In the context of the Hundred Years' War, what was the primary objective of 'chevauchée' raids?

Answer: To damage infrastructure and deny resources to the opposing side.

'Chevauchée' raids during the Hundred Years' War were designed to devastate enemy territory, destroy infrastructure, and deny resources to the opposing side, weakening their ability to wage war.

Related Concepts:

  • How was scorched earth utilized during the Hundred Years' War?: During the Hundred Years' War, both English and French forces conducted 'chevauchée' raids, a form of scorched-earth tactic, across enemy territory. The objective was to damage infrastructure and deny resources to the opposing side.

What strategy did Robert the Bruce reportedly advocate for Scotland to thwart English invasions?

Answer: Burning the plains and keeping supplies in fortified places.

Robert the Bruce reportedly advocated for a scorched-earth strategy involving burning the plains and securing supplies in fortified locations to create a wasteland that would impede English invasions.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth strategy did Robert the Bruce advocate for Scotland?: According to a 14th-century poem, Robert the Bruce advised a scorched-earth strategy to thwart Edward I of England's invasion of Scotland. The plan involved burning the plains and keeping supplies in fortified places to create a wasteland that would impede the invading army.

Which historical conflict saw the practice of 'slighting' used to render fortifications unusable?

Answer: The Wars of Scottish Independence and the English Civil War

The practice of 'slighting,' the deliberate destruction of fortifications, was notably employed during conflicts such as the Wars of Scottish Independence and the English Civil War.

Related Concepts:

  • What is 'slighting' in the context of fortifications, and when was it used?: Slighting is the deliberate destruction, partial or complete, of a fortification. It was used during the Wars of Scottish Independence and the English Civil War to render structures unusable as fortresses. Robert the Bruce, for example, slighted Scottish castles to prevent English occupation.
  • Describe Vlad the Impaler's scorched-earth tactics against Mehmed II in 1462.: When Mehmed II invaded Wallachia in 1462, Vlad the Impaler employed scorched-earth tactics. As he retreated, he destroyed resources and famously presented Mehmed's approaching army with a 'forest' of over 20,000 impaled bodies, a horrifying sight that contributed to Mehmed's withdrawal.

How did Stephen the Great employ scorched-earth tactics against the Ottoman Army in the Carpathians?

Answer: By destroying resources and hindering the Ottoman advance.

Stephen the Great utilized scorched-earth tactics in the Carpathians against the Ottoman Army by destroying resources and hindering their advance, thereby denying them sustenance and logistical support.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Stephen the Great employ scorched earth against the Ottoman Army?: Stephen the Great utilized scorched-earth tactics in the Carpathians against the Ottoman Army in 1475 and 1476. This strategy aimed to deny resources and hinder the advance of the invading Ottoman forces.

What unique and horrifying tactic did Vlad the Impaler famously employ during his scorched-earth campaign against Mehmed II in 1462?

Answer: Presenting the army with a 'forest' of impaled bodies.

Vlad the Impaler's scorched-earth campaign against Mehmed II in 1462 famously included the horrifying tactic of displaying over 20,000 impaled bodies, intended as a psychological deterrent.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe Vlad the Impaler's scorched-earth tactics against Mehmed II in 1462.: When Mehmed II invaded Wallachia in 1462, Vlad the Impaler employed scorched-earth tactics. As he retreated, he destroyed resources and famously presented Mehmed's approaching army with a 'forest' of over 20,000 impaled bodies, a horrifying sight that contributed to Mehmed's withdrawal.

What was the impact of scorched-earth policies employed during the Anglicisation of Ireland in the 16th century, as described by Edmund Spenser?

Answer: Extreme hardship and depopulation in Munster.

Edmund Spenser described the devastating impact of 16th-century scorched-earth policies in Ireland, noting the extreme hardship and depopulation inflicted upon regions like Munster.

Related Concepts:

  • How were scorched-earth policies used during the Anglicisation of Ireland in the 16th century?: In 16th century Ireland, English commanders like Walter Devereux and Richard Bingham employed scorched-earth policies, particularly during the Desmond Rebellions. Much of Munster was laid waste, leading to extreme hardship and depopulation, as vividly described by Edmund Spenser.

What scorched-earth measures did Grandmaster Jean Parisot de Valette order during the Great Siege of Malta in 1565?

Answer: Harvesting unripe grain and poisoning wells.

During the Great Siege of Malta, Grandmaster de Valette ordered the harvesting of unripe grain and the poisoning of wells to deny resources to the Ottoman attackers.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth measures were taken during the Great Siege of Malta in 1565?: During the Great Siege of Malta, Grandmaster Jean Parisot de Valette ordered the harvesting of all crops, including unripe grain, to deprive the attacking Ottomans of local food supplies. Additionally, the Knights poisoned wells with bitter herbs and dead animals.

During the Thirty Years' War, what action did Imperial General Torquato Conti order upon retreating from the Swedish army in 1630?

Answer: To burn houses, destroy villages, and harm property and people.

Imperial General Torquato Conti ordered his troops to burn houses, destroy villages, and generally harm property and people to deny resources to the Swedish army during his retreat in 1630.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth actions did Torquato Conti order during the Thirty Years' War?: In 1630, during the Thirty Years' War, Imperial General Torquato Conti, retreating from the Swedish army, ordered his troops to burn houses, destroy villages, and generally harm property and people. This was done to deny resources to the Swedes and leave ruins behind.

What was the purpose of the French scorched-earth policy in the Palatinate during the Nine Years' War?

Answer: To deny resources to German allies and prevent invasion of France.

The French scorched-earth policy in the Palatinate during the Nine Years' War aimed to deny resources to German allies and prevent the invasion of France by systematically destroying towns and villages.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the French scorched-earth policy in the Palatinate during the Nine Years' War?: In 1688, Louis XIV and Marquis de Louvois implemented a scorched-earth policy in the Palatinate, Baden, and Württemberg during the Nine Years' War. French troops systematically destroyed over 20 towns and numerous villages, including Heidelberg and Mannheim, to deny resources to German allies and prevent invasion of France.

How did Shivaji Maharaj's 'Ganimi Kava' tactics differ from typical scorched-earth policies regarding civilians and religious sites?

Answer: They strictly ordered not to harm civilians or disrespect religious sites.

Shivaji Maharaj's 'Ganimi Kava' tactics, while involving looting and destruction, strictly prohibited harming civilians or disrespecting religious sites, distinguishing them from more brutal scorched-earth approaches.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Shivaji Maharaj's forces utilize scorched-earth tactics in the Mughal–Maratha Wars?: Shivaji Maharaj introduced scorched-earth tactics known as 'Ganimi Kava'. His forces looted Mughal traders and burnt cities, but were strictly ordered not to harm civilians or disrespect religious sites. His son, Sambhaji Maharaj, also employed these tactics.

Which historical practice involved the deliberate destruction of fortifications to prevent their reuse?

Answer: Slighting

Slighting is the historical practice of deliberately destroying fortifications to prevent their reuse by an enemy, often carried out after a successful siege or during periods of consolidation.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe Vlad the Impaler's scorched-earth tactics against Mehmed II in 1462.: When Mehmed II invaded Wallachia in 1462, Vlad the Impaler employed scorched-earth tactics. As he retreated, he destroyed resources and famously presented Mehmed's approaching army with a 'forest' of over 20,000 impaled bodies, a horrifying sight that contributed to Mehmed's withdrawal.
  • What historical event involved the deliberate destruction of fortifications to prevent their reuse?: The practice of 'slighting' involved the deliberate destruction of fortifications to prevent their reuse by an enemy. This occurred during conflicts like the Wars of Scottish Independence and the English Civil War, where castles were dismantled after capture or abandonment.

Napoleonic Era and 19th Century Conflicts

Peter the Great's scorched-earth strategy during the Great Northern War (1707-1708) involved leaving captured cities intact for the Swedish army.

Answer: False

Peter the Great's scorched-earth strategy during the Great Northern War aimed to deny sustenance to the Swedish army by destroying resources and infrastructure, not by leaving captured cities intact.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the scorched-earth strategy used by Peter the Great during the Great Northern War?: During the Great Northern War, Peter the Great's forces employed scorched-earth tactics to impede Charles XII's campaign towards Moscow in 1707-1708. This involved destroying resources and infrastructure to deny sustenance to the Swedish army.

The Sullivan Expedition in the American Revolutionary War destroyed over 40 Iroquois villages and their winter crop stores.

Answer: True

The Sullivan Expedition, conducted during the American Revolutionary War, systematically destroyed over 40 Iroquois villages and their winter crop stores, leading to severe hardship for the Iroquois population.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Sullivan Expedition utilize scorched earth during the American Revolutionary War?: In 1779, General John Sullivan led the Sullivan Expedition against the Iroquois nations, employing a scorched-earth campaign. His troops destroyed over 40 Iroquois villages and their winter crop stores, leading to significant starvation and deaths among the Iroquois population that following winter.

Toussaint Louverture's scorched-earth plan for the Haitian Revolution involved leaving roads intact and protecting food supplies for the French.

Answer: False

Toussaint Louverture's scorched-earth plan for the Haitian Revolution instructed his forces to destroy everything that could provide sustenance to the French, including tearing up roads and burning resources.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth plan did Toussaint Louverture outline for the Haitian Revolution?: Toussaint Louverture outlined a scorched-earth plan for the Haitian Revolution, instructing his forces to destroy everything that could provide sustenance to the French. He advocated for tearing up roads, throwing corpses into foundations, and burning everything to show the French the 'hell which they deserve'.

During the Napoleonic invasion of Portugal in 1810, the Portuguese population was ordered to preserve all food supplies and shelter for the French army.

Answer: False

During the Napoleonic invasion of Portugal, the Portuguese population was ordered to destroy all food supplies, forage, and shelter to deny resources to the French army, creating a 'scorched earth' belt.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Manuel Belgrano's scorched-earth policy during the Jujuy Exodus in the South American War of Independence?: Manuel Belgrano led the Jujuy Exodus in 1812, ordering the forced displacement of people and the destruction of houses, crops, food stocks, and iron objects. This strict scorched-earth policy aimed to deprive the Royalist army of resources, creating a wasteland for them to advance into.

Russia's scorched-earth policy in 1812 involved burning the countryside and Moscow to deny sustenance to Napoleon's Grande Armée.

Answer: True

Russia's scorched-earth policy in 1812 involved burning the countryside and Moscow during Napoleon's invasion, significantly hindering the Grande Armée's ability to sustain itself and contributing to its disastrous retreat.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Russia's scorched-earth policy contribute to Napoleon's defeat in 1812?: In 1812, Emperor Alexander I utilized a scorched-earth policy during Napoleon's invasion of Russia. As Russian forces retreated, they burned the countryside and allegedly Moscow, leaving nothing for the Grande Armée to live off. This, combined with supply issues along the depleted route, led to the disastrous retreat of Napoleon's forces.
  • How did Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt employ scorched earth during the Greek War of Independence?: In 1827, Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt launched a scorched-earth campaign in the Peloponnese against Greek revolutionaries. In response to guerrilla attacks, his forces burned villages and fields, threatening the population with starvation and deporting civilians, which contributed to European intervention.

Manuel Belgrano's Jujuy Exodus in 1812 involved preserving all houses and crops to welcome the Royalist army.

Answer: False

Manuel Belgrano's Jujuy Exodus in 1812 was a scorched-earth policy that involved the destruction of houses, crops, and food stocks to deprive the Royalist army of resources.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Manuel Belgrano's scorched-earth policy during the Jujuy Exodus in the South American War of Independence?: Manuel Belgrano led the Jujuy Exodus in 1812, ordering the forced displacement of people and the destruction of houses, crops, food stocks, and iron objects. This strict scorched-earth policy aimed to deprive the Royalist army of resources, creating a wasteland for them to advance into.

Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt employed scorched-earth tactics in the Peloponnese during the Greek War of Independence by burning villages and deporting civilians.

Answer: True

During the Greek War of Independence, Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt conducted a scorched-earth campaign in the Peloponnese, burning villages and fields and deporting civilians to suppress the rebellion.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt employ scorched earth during the Greek War of Independence?: In 1827, Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt launched a scorched-earth campaign in the Peloponnese against Greek revolutionaries. In response to guerrilla attacks, his forces burned villages and fields, threatening the population with starvation and deporting civilians, which contributed to European intervention.

During the American Civil War, General Sherman viewed Confederate supplies as contraband and destroyed them to prolong the conflict.

Answer: False

During the American Civil War, General Sherman destroyed Confederate supplies to hasten the war's end by crippling the Confederacy's ability to wage war, not to prolong it.

Related Concepts:

  • What role did scorched earth play in the American Civil War, particularly with Generals Sheridan and Sherman?: Union Generals Philip Sheridan and William Tecumseh Sherman widely employed scorched-earth policies during the American Civil War. Sherman viewed supplies within Confederate reach as contraband, destroying them to hasten the war's end, while Sheridan applied similar tactics in the Shenandoah Valley and against Native Americans on the Great Plains.

General Thomas Ewing Jr.'s General Order No. 11 during the American Civil War mandated the evacuation and burning of three-and-a-half counties in western Missouri.

Answer: True

General Order No. 11, issued by Thomas Ewing Jr. during the American Civil War, mandated the evacuation and subsequent destruction of property in three-and-a-half counties in western Missouri.

Related Concepts:

  • What was General Thomas Ewing Jr.'s General Order No. 11 during the American Civil War?: In response to Quantrill's raid on Lawrence, Kansas, Brigadier General Thomas Ewing Jr. issued General Order No. 11 in 1863. This order mandated the near-total evacuation of three-and-a-half counties in western Missouri, which were subsequently looted and burned by US Army troops.

Confederate forces, retreating from Richmond in 1865, deliberately preserved all military supplies and buildings to deny them to Union forces.

Answer: False

As Confederate forces retreated from Richmond in 1865, military supplies were destroyed, and fires spread to buildings, rather than preserving them to deny to Union forces.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Confederate forces use scorched earth when retreating from Richmond, Virginia, in 1865?: As Ulysses S. Grant's forces broke through Richmond's defenses, Confederate President Jefferson Davis ordered the destruction of military supplies. The resulting fires spread to buildings and Confederate warships, forcing civilians to flee the burning city.

Kit Carson's scorched-earth policy against the Navajo involved burning fields and homes and destroying livestock, forcing their surrender.

Answer: True

Kit Carson implemented a scorched-earth policy against the Navajo, which included burning their fields and homes and destroying livestock, ultimately forcing their surrender due to lack of resources.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe Kit Carson's scorched-earth policy against the Navajo people.: Under James Henry Carleton's direction, Kit Carson instituted a scorched-earth policy against the Navajo people in the American West. This involved burning fields and homes and destroying livestock, forcing the Navajo to surrender due to lack of resources. The Navajo were then subjected to the 'Long Walk' to Fort Sumner, New Mexico.

What was the strategic aim of Peter the Great's scorched-earth tactics during the Great Northern War (1707-1708)?

Answer: To deny sustenance to the Swedish army and impede their campaign.

Peter the Great's scorched-earth tactics during the Great Northern War aimed to deny sustenance to Charles XII's Swedish army and impede their campaign by destroying resources and infrastructure.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the scorched-earth strategy used by Peter the Great during the Great Northern War?: During the Great Northern War, Peter the Great's forces employed scorched-earth tactics to impede Charles XII's campaign towards Moscow in 1707-1708. This involved destroying resources and infrastructure to deny sustenance to the Swedish army.

What was the consequence for the Iroquois nations during the Sullivan Expedition in 1779?

Answer: They suffered significant starvation and deaths due to destroyed crop stores.

The Sullivan Expedition's scorched-earth campaign resulted in the destruction of Iroquois villages and crop stores, leading to severe starvation and deaths among the Iroquois population during the subsequent winter.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Sullivan Expedition utilize scorched earth during the American Revolutionary War?: In 1779, General John Sullivan led the Sullivan Expedition against the Iroquois nations, employing a scorched-earth campaign. His troops destroyed over 40 Iroquois villages and their winter crop stores, leading to significant starvation and deaths among the Iroquois population that following winter.

Toussaint Louverture's scorched-earth plan for the Haitian Revolution instructed his forces to do which of the following?

Answer: Destroy everything that could provide sustenance to the French.

Toussaint Louverture's scorched-earth plan for the Haitian Revolution directed his forces to destroy all resources that could sustain the French, including food, shelter, and infrastructure.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth plan did Toussaint Louverture outline for the Haitian Revolution?: Toussaint Louverture outlined a scorched-earth plan for the Haitian Revolution, instructing his forces to destroy everything that could provide sustenance to the French. He advocated for tearing up roads, throwing corpses into foundations, and burning everything to show the French the 'hell which they deserve'.

How did the Portuguese population's scorched-earth actions impact the French army during the Napoleonic invasion of Portugal in 1810?

Answer: It created a 'scorched earth' belt that significantly weakened the French army.

The Portuguese population's scorched-earth actions during the Napoleonic invasion of 1810 created a resource-depleted zone that significantly weakened the French army, hindering its advance and sustenance.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Manuel Belgrano's scorched-earth policy during the Jujuy Exodus in the South American War of Independence?: Manuel Belgrano led the Jujuy Exodus in 1812, ordering the forced displacement of people and the destruction of houses, crops, food stocks, and iron objects. This strict scorched-earth policy aimed to deprive the Royalist army of resources, creating a wasteland for them to advance into.

What was the primary reason for Napoleon's disastrous retreat from Russia in 1812, according to the source?

Answer: The lack of supplies due to Russia's scorched-earth policy.

Napoleon's disastrous retreat from Russia in 1812 was primarily attributed to the lack of supplies, exacerbated by Russia's scorched-earth policy which denied resources to the Grande Armée.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt employ scorched earth during the Greek War of Independence?: In 1827, Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt launched a scorched-earth campaign in the Peloponnese against Greek revolutionaries. In response to guerrilla attacks, his forces burned villages and fields, threatening the population with starvation and deporting civilians, which contributed to European intervention.

Manuel Belgrano's Jujuy Exodus in 1812 was a scorched-earth policy aimed at depriving which army of resources?

Answer: The Royalist Army

Manuel Belgrano's Jujuy Exodus in 1812 was a scorched-earth policy designed to deprive the advancing Royalist army of resources and sustenance.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Manuel Belgrano's scorched-earth policy during the Jujuy Exodus in the South American War of Independence?: Manuel Belgrano led the Jujuy Exodus in 1812, ordering the forced displacement of people and the destruction of houses, crops, food stocks, and iron objects. This strict scorched-earth policy aimed to deprive the Royalist army of resources, creating a wasteland for them to advance into.

What scorched-earth actions did Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt take during the Greek War of Independence in the Peloponnese?

Answer: He burned villages and fields, and deported civilians.

Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt employed scorched-earth tactics during the Greek War of Independence by burning villages and fields and deporting civilians in the Peloponnese.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt employ scorched earth during the Greek War of Independence?: In 1827, Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt launched a scorched-earth campaign in the Peloponnese against Greek revolutionaries. In response to guerrilla attacks, his forces burned villages and fields, threatening the population with starvation and deporting civilians, which contributed to European intervention.

How did Union Generals Philip Sheridan and William Tecumseh Sherman utilize scorched-earth policies during the American Civil War?

Answer: To destroy supplies and hasten the war's end.

Union Generals Sherman and Sheridan employed scorched-earth policies during the American Civil War to destroy Confederate supplies and infrastructure, aiming to hasten the war's conclusion by crippling the Confederacy's ability to fight.

Related Concepts:

  • What role did scorched earth play in the American Civil War, particularly with Generals Sheridan and Sherman?: Union Generals Philip Sheridan and William Tecumseh Sherman widely employed scorched-earth policies during the American Civil War. Sherman viewed supplies within Confederate reach as contraband, destroying them to hasten the war's end, while Sheridan applied similar tactics in the Shenandoah Valley and against Native Americans on the Great Plains.

What happened to military supplies and buildings as Confederate forces retreated from Richmond, Virginia, in 1865?

Answer: Military supplies were destroyed, and fires spread to buildings.

As Confederate forces retreated from Richmond in 1865, military supplies were destroyed, and the resulting fires spread to buildings, contributing to the city's devastation.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Confederate forces use scorched earth when retreating from Richmond, Virginia, in 1865?: As Ulysses S. Grant's forces broke through Richmond's defenses, Confederate President Jefferson Davis ordered the destruction of military supplies. The resulting fires spread to buildings and Confederate warships, forcing civilians to flee the burning city.

What was the ultimate goal of Kit Carson's scorched-earth policy against the Navajo people?

Answer: To force their surrender due to lack of resources.

Kit Carson's scorched-earth policy against the Navajo aimed to destroy their fields, homes, and livestock, thereby forcing their surrender due to a critical lack of resources.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe Kit Carson's scorched-earth policy against the Navajo people.: Under James Henry Carleton's direction, Kit Carson instituted a scorched-earth policy against the Navajo people in the American West. This involved burning fields and homes and destroying livestock, forcing the Navajo to surrender due to lack of resources. The Navajo were then subjected to the 'Long Walk' to Fort Sumner, New Mexico.

World Wars and 20th Century Conflicts

During the Second Boer War, British forces under Lord Kitchener destroyed Boer farms and homes to support Boer guerrillas.

Answer: False

During the Second Boer War, British forces destroyed Boer farms and homes to deny food and supplies to Boer guerrillas, not to support them.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth tactics did the British employ during the Second Boer War?: During the Second Boer War, British forces under Lord Kitchener implemented a scorched-earth policy in the occupied Boer republics. Farms and homes of civilians were destroyed to deny food and supplies to Boer guerrillas, while Boer non-combatants were interned in concentration camps.

Historian P. L. A. Goldman estimated that approximately 27,927 Boer civilians died in British concentration camps during the Second Boer War.

Answer: True

Historian P. L. A. Goldman estimated that around 27,927 Boer civilians, primarily women and children, perished in British concentration camps during the Second Boer War due to disease, poor conditions, and lack of supplies.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome for Boer civilians interned in concentration camps during the Second Boer War?: Boer civilians, primarily women and children, were interned in concentration camps during the Second Boer War. Due to infectious diseases, poor planning, lack of supplies, and overcrowding, a significant number died. Historian P. L. A. Goldman estimated that 27,927 Boers died in these camps.

In the New Zealand Wars of 1868, the Tūhoe people were subjected to a scorched-earth policy, resulting in the capture of their leaders.

Answer: False

During the New Zealand Wars in 1868, the Tūhoe people were subjected to a scorched-earth policy involving the destruction of their crops and buildings, and the capture of those of fighting age, but not specifically their leaders.

Related Concepts:

  • How were scorched-earth tactics used in the New Zealand Wars?: In 1868, during the New Zealand Wars, the Tūhoe people, who had sheltered the Māori leader Te Kooti, were subjected to a scorched-earth policy. Their crops and buildings were destroyed, and those of fighting age were captured.

During World War I, the Imperial Russian Army implemented a scorched-earth strategy during their retreat in 1915, destroying crops, houses, and railways.

Answer: True

During their retreat on the Eastern Front in World War I, the Imperial Russian Army employed a large-scale scorched-earth strategy, destroying crops, houses, railways, and forcibly relocating populations to deny resources to the advancing German forces.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Imperial Russian Army employ scorched earth on the Eastern Front in World War I?: On the Eastern Front of World War I, the Imperial Russian Army implemented a massive scorched-earth strategy during their retreat from the German army in 1915. Russian troops destroyed crops, houses, railways, and cities, and forcibly removed large populations to deny resources to the advancing Germans.
  • What was Operation Alberich during World War I on the Western Front?: Operation Alberich, conducted by the German army on February 24, 1917, was a strategic scorched-earth withdrawal from the Somme battlefield to the Hindenburg Line. This move shortened the defensive line, but the static nature of the Western Front limited the policy's effectiveness.

In World War I, the British army set fire to Romanian oil fields to prevent them from falling into the hands of the Central Powers, burning approximately 800 million liters of oil.

Answer: True

In late 1916, the British army set fire to Romanian oil fields to prevent their capture by the Central Powers, resulting in the destruction of approximately 800 million liters of oil.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth action did the British take regarding Romanian oil fields in World War I?: In late 1916, the British army set fire to the Romanian oil fields to prevent them from falling into the hands of the Central Powers. Approximately 800 million liters of oil were burned.

Operation Alberich during World War I was a strategic withdrawal by the French army to the Hindenburg Line.

Answer: False

Operation Alberich was a strategic scorched-earth withdrawal by the German army, not the French, to the Hindenburg Line in 1917.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Operation Alberich during World War I on the Western Front?: Operation Alberich, conducted by the German army on February 24, 1917, was a strategic scorched-earth withdrawal from the Somme battlefield to the Hindenburg Line. This move shortened the defensive line, but the static nature of the Western Front limited the policy's effectiveness.

During the Greco-Turkish War, the retreating Greek Army carried out a scorched-earth policy, committing numerous outrages against Turkish villagers.

Answer: True

The retreating Greek Army during the Greco-Turkish War implemented a scorched-earth policy, engaging in widespread destruction and outrages against Turkish villagers as they withdrew from Anatolia.

Related Concepts:

  • How was scorched earth used in the Greco-Turkish War (1919–1922)?: During the Greco-Turkish War, the retreating Greek Army carried out a scorched-earth policy while fleeing Anatolia. Historian Sydney Nettleton Fisher noted that the Greek army committed 'every known outrage against defenceless Turkish villagers,' making the retreat more devastating than the occupation.

The Japanese 'Three Alls Policy' in the Second Sino-Japanese War involved 'killing all, burning all, looting all,' causing immense destruction.

Answer: True

The Imperial Japanese Army's 'Three Alls Policy' during the Second Sino-Japanese War was a brutal scorched-earth strategy characterized by 'killing all, burning all, looting all,' resulting in catastrophic destruction and loss of life.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'Three Alls Policy' employed by the Imperial Japanese Army in the Second Sino-Japanese War?: The 'Three Alls Policy' was a scorched-earth strategy used by the Imperial Japanese Army during the Second Sino-Japanese War. It involved 'killing all, burning all, looting all,' causing immense environmental and infrastructure damage, and contributing to the destruction of villages and cities.
  • How did Chinese forces use scorched earth during the Second Sino-Japanese War?: Chinese Nationalist forces destroyed dams and levees in an attempt to flood land and slow the Japanese advance. This tactic resulted in the 1938 Yellow River flood. Additionally, during the 1938 Changsha fire, Nationalist forces burned the city to prevent resources from falling into Japanese hands.

During the Second Sino-Japanese War, Chinese Nationalist forces deliberately breached dams to slow the Japanese advance, causing the 1938 Yellow River flood.

Answer: True

In an effort to impede the Japanese advance during the Second Sino-Japanese War, Chinese Nationalist forces deliberately breached dams and levees, leading to the devastating 1938 Yellow River flood.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Chinese forces use scorched earth during the Second Sino-Japanese War?: Chinese Nationalist forces destroyed dams and levees in an attempt to flood land and slow the Japanese advance. This tactic resulted in the 1938 Yellow River flood. Additionally, during the 1938 Changsha fire, Nationalist forces burned the city to prevent resources from falling into Japanese hands.

Finnish forces during the Winter War destroyed provisions and shelter, and some soldiers burned their own homes to deny resources to the invading Soviet Red Army.

Answer: True

During the Winter War, Finnish forces employed scorched-earth tactics near the border, destroying provisions and shelter, and some soldiers even burned their own homes to deny resources to the invading Soviet Red Army.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth tactics did the Finns use during the Winter War?: At the start of the Winter War in 1939, Finnish forces employed scorched-earth tactics near the border. They destroyed provisions and shelter to deny resources to the invading Soviet Red Army, with some soldiers even burning their own homes and villages, such as Suomussalmi.

During Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union, Soviet district governments initiated scorched-earth policies by destroying electrical and telecommunications resources.

Answer: True

During Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union, Soviet district governments implemented scorched-earth policies, destroying vital resources such as electrical and telecommunications infrastructure to hinder the German advance.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth tactics did the Finns use during the Winter War?: At the start of the Winter War in 1939, Finnish forces employed scorched-earth tactics near the border. They destroyed provisions and shelter to deny resources to the invading Soviet Red Army, with some soldiers even burning their own homes and villages, such as Suomussalmi.
  • How did German forces implement scorched earth in the Soviet Union during World War II?: During Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union (Operation Barbarossa), Soviet district governments initiated partial scorched-earth policies, destroying electrical, telecommunications, rail, and industrial resources. Later, German forces, such as Army Group North and Army Group Don, also employed scorched-earth tactics, stealing crops, destroying farms, and razing settlements to slow pursuing Soviet forces.

The 'Nero Decree' ordered by Adolf Hitler in 1945 mandated the preservation of German industry and infrastructure.

Answer: False

The 'Nero Decree,' ordered by Adolf Hitler in 1945, mandated a nationwide scorched-earth policy to destroy German industry and infrastructure, though Albert Speer actively resisted this order.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'Nero Decree' ordered by Adolf Hitler in 1945?: The Nero Decree was an order by Adolf Hitler in 1945 for Albert Speer, his minister of armaments, to carry out a nationwide scorched-earth policy. Speer actively resisted this order, managing to prevent the destruction of German industry and infrastructure.

The railroad plough was used during World War II to repair damaged railways quickly for enemy troop movements.

Answer: False

The railroad plough was used during World War II retreats to partially destroy railways, thereby denying their use to enemy forces, not to repair them for troop movements.

Related Concepts:

  • How was the 'railroad plough' used in World War II?: The railroad plough was utilized in Germany, Czechoslovakia, and other countries during World War II. It was employed during retreats to partially destroy railways, thereby denying their use to enemy forces.

During the Indonesian National Revolution, Indonesian fighters deliberately burned down the southern part of Bandung in an event known as the 'Bandung Sea of Fire'.

Answer: True

During the Indonesian National Revolution, Indonesian fighters executed a scorched-earth tactic known as the 'Bandung Sea of Fire,' deliberately burning down the southern part of Bandung as they evacuated.

Related Concepts:

The 1938 Yellow River flood was caused by natural seismic activity, unrelated to military actions during the Second Sino-Japanese War.

Answer: False

The 1938 Yellow River flood was a result of deliberate actions by Chinese Nationalist forces who breached dams and levees to impede the Japanese advance during the Second Sino-Japanese War.

Related Concepts:

The rationale behind the German scorched-earth policy in the Soviet Union during WWII was to support Soviet civilian populations by preserving resources.

Answer: False

The German scorched-earth policy in the Soviet Union during WWII was intended to slow down pursuing Soviet forces by destroying resources and settlements, thereby hindering their advance, not to support Soviet civilians.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth tactics did the Finns use during the Winter War?: At the start of the Winter War in 1939, Finnish forces employed scorched-earth tactics near the border. They destroyed provisions and shelter to deny resources to the invading Soviet Red Army, with some soldiers even burning their own homes and villages, such as Suomussalmi.
  • How did German forces implement scorched earth in the Soviet Union during World War II?: During Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union (Operation Barbarossa), Soviet district governments initiated partial scorched-earth policies, destroying electrical, telecommunications, rail, and industrial resources. Later, German forces, such as Army Group North and Army Group Don, also employed scorched-earth tactics, stealing crops, destroying farms, and razing settlements to slow pursuing Soviet forces.

During the Second Boer War, what was the purpose of the British scorched-earth policy targeting Boer farms and homes?

Answer: To deny food and supplies to Boer guerrillas.

The British scorched-earth policy during the Second Boer War targeted Boer farms and homes to deny essential food and supplies to Boer guerrillas, thereby undermining their resistance.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth tactics did the British employ during the Second Boer War?: During the Second Boer War, British forces under Lord Kitchener implemented a scorched-earth policy in the occupied Boer republics. Farms and homes of civilians were destroyed to deny food and supplies to Boer guerrillas, while Boer non-combatants were interned in concentration camps.

What factor contributed significantly to the high death toll of Boer civilians in British concentration camps during the Second Boer War?

Answer: Infectious diseases, poor planning, and lack of supplies.

High death tolls among Boer civilians in British concentration camps during the Second Boer War were significantly attributed to infectious diseases, inadequate planning, and a severe lack of essential supplies.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the outcome for Boer civilians interned in concentration camps during the Second Boer War?: Boer civilians, primarily women and children, were interned in concentration camps during the Second Boer War. Due to infectious diseases, poor planning, lack of supplies, and overcrowding, a significant number died. Historian P. L. A. Goldman estimated that 27,927 Boers died in these camps.
  • What scorched-earth tactics did the British employ during the Second Boer War?: During the Second Boer War, British forces under Lord Kitchener implemented a scorched-earth policy in the occupied Boer republics. Farms and homes of civilians were destroyed to deny food and supplies to Boer guerrillas, while Boer non-combatants were interned in concentration camps.

How were scorched-earth tactics used against the Tūhoe people during the New Zealand Wars in 1868?

Answer: Their crops and buildings were destroyed.

During the New Zealand Wars in 1868, scorched-earth tactics were employed against the Tūhoe people, involving the destruction of their crops and buildings.

Related Concepts:

  • How were scorched-earth tactics used in the New Zealand Wars?: In 1868, during the New Zealand Wars, the Tūhoe people, who had sheltered the Māori leader Te Kooti, were subjected to a scorched-earth policy. Their crops and buildings were destroyed, and those of fighting age were captured.

What was the scale of the Imperial Russian Army's scorched-earth strategy during their retreat on the Eastern Front in World War I?

Answer: Massive, involving destruction of crops, houses, railways, and cities.

The Imperial Russian Army's scorched-earth strategy during their 1915 retreat on the Eastern Front was massive in scale, encompassing the destruction of crops, houses, railways, and cities, alongside the forced removal of populations.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Imperial Russian Army employ scorched earth on the Eastern Front in World War I?: On the Eastern Front of World War I, the Imperial Russian Army implemented a massive scorched-earth strategy during their retreat from the German army in 1915. Russian troops destroyed crops, houses, railways, and cities, and forcibly removed large populations to deny resources to the advancing Germans.
  • What was Operation Alberich during World War I on the Western Front?: Operation Alberich, conducted by the German army on February 24, 1917, was a strategic scorched-earth withdrawal from the Somme battlefield to the Hindenburg Line. This move shortened the defensive line, but the static nature of the Western Front limited the policy's effectiveness.

What action did the British take regarding Romanian oil fields in late 1916 during World War I?

Answer: They set fire to the oil fields to prevent enemy capture.

In late 1916, the British army set fire to Romanian oil fields to prevent them from falling into the hands of the Central Powers during World War I.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth action did the British take regarding Romanian oil fields in World War I?: In late 1916, the British army set fire to the Romanian oil fields to prevent them from falling into the hands of the Central Powers. Approximately 800 million liters of oil were burned.

Operation Alberich, conducted by the German army in 1917, was a strategic withdrawal to shorten the defensive line, but its effectiveness was limited by what factor?

Answer: The static nature of the Western Front.

Operation Alberich, a German withdrawal to the Hindenburg Line, had its effectiveness limited by the static nature of the Western Front, which meant the withdrawal did not significantly alter the strategic balance.

Related Concepts:

  • What was Operation Alberich during World War I on the Western Front?: Operation Alberich, conducted by the German army on February 24, 1917, was a strategic scorched-earth withdrawal from the Somme battlefield to the Hindenburg Line. This move shortened the defensive line, but the static nature of the Western Front limited the policy's effectiveness.

How did the retreating Greek Army's scorched-earth policy impact Anatolia during the Greco-Turkish War (1919–1922)?

Answer: It made the retreat more devastating than the occupation.

The retreating Greek Army's scorched-earth policy during the Greco-Turkish War resulted in widespread destruction and outrages against Turkish villagers, making the retreat more devastating than the preceding occupation.

Related Concepts:

  • How was scorched earth used in the Greco-Turkish War (1919–1922)?: During the Greco-Turkish War, the retreating Greek Army carried out a scorched-earth policy while fleeing Anatolia. Historian Sydney Nettleton Fisher noted that the Greek army committed 'every known outrage against defenceless Turkish villagers,' making the retreat more devastating than the occupation.

What was the primary characteristic of the Imperial Japanese Army's 'Three Alls Policy' during the Second Sino-Japanese War?

Answer: Kill all, burn all, loot all.

The Imperial Japanese Army's 'Three Alls Policy' during the Second Sino-Japanese War was characterized by 'killing all, burning all, looting all,' representing a brutal scorched-earth strategy.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'Three Alls Policy' employed by the Imperial Japanese Army in the Second Sino-Japanese War?: The 'Three Alls Policy' was a scorched-earth strategy used by the Imperial Japanese Army during the Second Sino-Japanese War. It involved 'killing all, burning all, looting all,' causing immense environmental and infrastructure damage, and contributing to the destruction of villages and cities.

What specific environmental damage resulted from Chinese actions during the Second Sino-Japanese War?

Answer: The 1938 Yellow River flood.

During the Second Sino-Japanese War, Chinese Nationalist forces deliberately breached dams, causing the 1938 Yellow River flood, a significant instance of environmental damage resulting from military actions.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'Three Alls Policy' employed by the Imperial Japanese Army in the Second Sino-Japanese War?: The 'Three Alls Policy' was a scorched-earth strategy used by the Imperial Japanese Army during the Second Sino-Japanese War. It involved 'killing all, burning all, looting all,' causing immense environmental and infrastructure damage, and contributing to the destruction of villages and cities.

What scorched-earth tactics did Finnish forces employ during the Winter War near the border?

Answer: Destroying provisions and shelter.

During the Winter War, Finnish forces utilized scorched-earth tactics by destroying provisions and shelter near the border to deny resources to the invading Soviet Red Army.

Related Concepts:

  • How did Chinese forces use scorched earth during the Second Sino-Japanese War?: Chinese Nationalist forces destroyed dams and levees in an attempt to flood land and slow the Japanese advance. This tactic resulted in the 1938 Yellow River flood. Additionally, during the 1938 Changsha fire, Nationalist forces burned the city to prevent resources from falling into Japanese hands.

What was the rationale behind the German scorched-earth policy in the Soviet Union during WWII?

Answer: To slow down pursuing Soviet forces by destroying resources and settlements.

The German scorched-earth policy in the Soviet Union during WWII was implemented to slow down pursuing Soviet forces by destroying resources and settlements, thereby hindering their advance.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth tactics did the Finns use during the Winter War?: At the start of the Winter War in 1939, Finnish forces employed scorched-earth tactics near the border. They destroyed provisions and shelter to deny resources to the invading Soviet Red Army, with some soldiers even burning their own homes and villages, such as Suomussalmi.
  • How did German forces implement scorched earth in the Soviet Union during World War II?: During Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union (Operation Barbarossa), Soviet district governments initiated partial scorched-earth policies, destroying electrical, telecommunications, rail, and industrial resources. Later, German forces, such as Army Group North and Army Group Don, also employed scorched-earth tactics, stealing crops, destroying farms, and razing settlements to slow pursuing Soviet forces.

What was the 'Nero Decree' ordered by Adolf Hitler in 1945?

Answer: An order to carry out a nationwide scorched-earth policy.

The 'Nero Decree,' issued by Adolf Hitler in 1945, mandated a nationwide scorched-earth policy to destroy German industry and infrastructure, though it was largely resisted.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the 'Nero Decree' ordered by Adolf Hitler in 1945?: The Nero Decree was an order by Adolf Hitler in 1945 for Albert Speer, his minister of armaments, to carry out a nationwide scorched-earth policy. Speer actively resisted this order, managing to prevent the destruction of German industry and infrastructure.

How was the 'railroad plough' utilized during World War II retreats?

Answer: To partially destroy railways, denying their use to enemy forces.

The 'railroad plough' was used during World War II retreats to partially destroy railways, thereby denying their use to advancing enemy forces.

Related Concepts:

  • How was the 'railroad plough' used in World War II?: The railroad plough was utilized in Germany, Czechoslovakia, and other countries during World War II. It was employed during retreats to partially destroy railways, thereby denying their use to enemy forces.

What event during the Indonesian National Revolution is known as the 'Bandung Sea of Fire'?

Answer: The deliberate burning down of the southern part of Bandung by Indonesian fighters.

The 'Bandung Sea of Fire' refers to the event during the Indonesian National Revolution when Indonesian fighters deliberately burned down the southern part of Bandung as they evacuated.

Related Concepts:

Modern Conflicts and Contemporary Issues

Scorched-earth tactics were employed during the Yugoslav Wars primarily by Croatian civilians against Serbian settlements.

Answer: False

During the Yugoslav Wars, scorched-earth tactics were employed by the Croatian Army and Serbian paramilitary groups against various settlements, not primarily by Croatian civilians against Serbian settlements.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth actions were taken during the Indonesian National Revolution?: During the Indonesian National Revolution, Indonesian military and pro-Indonesia militias used scorched-earth tactics. In Bandung in March 1946, the southern part of the city was deliberately burned down in defiance as Indonesian fighters left the city, an event known as the 'Bandung Sea of Fire'.

The Soviet army's scorched-earth tactics in Afghanistan aimed to prevent the Mujahideen's return by destroying towns and villages and using mines.

Answer: True

The Soviet army employed scorched-earth tactics in Afghanistan, destroying towns and villages and using mines, with the objective of preventing the Mujahideen's return and disrupting their support networks.

Related Concepts:

  • How were scorched-earth tactics used during the Yugoslav Wars?: Scorched-earth tactics were employed during the Yugoslav Wars starting in 1991. These actions were carried out against Serbs in Krajina by the Croatian Army and by Serbian paramilitary groups.

In 2009, the United Nations accused the Sri Lankan government of using scorched-earth tactics against the Tamil population.

Answer: True

In 2009, the United Nations accused the Sri Lankan government of employing scorched-earth tactics against the Tamil population during the final stages of the civil war.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the Soviet army's scorched-earth tactics in the Soviet–Afghan War.: From 1983 to 1984, the Soviet army used scorched-earth tactics against towns and villages in Afghanistan. This strategy, part of a migratory 'genocide,' aimed to prevent the Mujahideen's return by destroying resources and using mines to cut off weapon supplies.

The Burmese military has been accused of using scorched-earth strategies since the 2021 coup, resulting in widespread destruction and civilian deaths.

Answer: True

Since the 2021 coup, the Burmese military has faced accusations from the UN of using scorched-earth strategies, leading to significant destruction, civilian deaths, and displacement.

Related Concepts:

  • What accusations were made against the Sri Lankan government regarding scorched-earth tactics in 2009?: In the 2009 Sri Lankan Civil War, the United Nations Regional Information Centre accused the Sri Lankan government of employing scorched-earth tactics against the Tamil population.

The Dahiya doctrine, applied in Gaza, involves the destruction of civilian infrastructure to encourage population resettlement.

Answer: False

The Dahiya doctrine involves the destruction of civilian infrastructure to pressure hostile governments, not specifically to encourage population resettlement. It has been applied in conflicts including Gaza.

Related Concepts:

  • How has the Burmese military used scorched-earth strategies in the Myanmar civil war?: Since the 2021 Myanmar coup d'état, the Burmese military has been accused by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights of using scorched-earth strategies. These actions have resulted in thousands of civilian deaths, displacement of 1.3 million people, and the destruction of 39,000 houses, while also denying humanitarian access.

As of early 2025, UN figures indicate that approximately 90% of Gaza's homes have been destroyed or damaged due to Israeli military operations.

Answer: True

UN figures as of early 2025 report that approximately 90% of Gaza's homes have been destroyed or damaged, with a significant percentage of all buildings affected by Israeli military operations.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Dahiya doctrine' and how has it been applied in Gaza?: The Dahiya doctrine is an Israeli military strategy involving the destruction of civilian infrastructure to pressure hostile governments. It was applied during the 2006 Lebanon War and again in Israel's 2023 military operations in Gaza, leading to widespread destruction of buildings, agricultural land, and infrastructure.

During the Yugoslav Wars, who were the primary actors employing scorched-earth tactics according to the source?

Answer: Croatian Army and Serbian paramilitary groups.

During the Yugoslav Wars, scorched-earth tactics were employed by both the Croatian Army and Serbian paramilitary groups against various settlements.

Related Concepts:

  • What scorched-earth actions were taken during the Indonesian National Revolution?: During the Indonesian National Revolution, Indonesian military and pro-Indonesia militias used scorched-earth tactics. In Bandung in March 1946, the southern part of the city was deliberately burned down in defiance as Indonesian fighters left the city, an event known as the 'Bandung Sea of Fire'.

What was the Soviet army's scorched-earth strategy in Afghanistan between 1983 and 1984 aimed at achieving?

Answer: To prevent the Mujahideen's return by destroying resources and using mines.

The Soviet army's scorched-earth strategy in Afghanistan aimed to prevent the Mujahideen's return by destroying towns and villages and using mines to disrupt their supply lines and support networks.

Related Concepts:

  • How were scorched-earth tactics used during the Yugoslav Wars?: Scorched-earth tactics were employed during the Yugoslav Wars starting in 1991. These actions were carried out against Serbs in Krajina by the Croatian Army and by Serbian paramilitary groups.

What accusations were made against the Sri Lankan government regarding scorched-earth tactics in 2009?

Answer: They were accused of using scorched-earth tactics against the Tamil population.

In 2009, the United Nations accused the Sri Lankan government of employing scorched-earth tactics against the Tamil population during the final phase of the civil war.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the Soviet army's scorched-earth tactics in the Soviet–Afghan War.: From 1983 to 1984, the Soviet army used scorched-earth tactics against towns and villages in Afghanistan. This strategy, part of a migratory 'genocide,' aimed to prevent the Mujahideen's return by destroying resources and using mines to cut off weapon supplies.

How has the Burmese military allegedly used scorched-earth strategies in the Myanmar civil war since the 2021 coup?

Answer: By destroying houses, causing civilian deaths and displacement, and denying humanitarian access.

Since the 2021 coup, the Burmese military has allegedly used scorched-earth strategies, resulting in the destruction of houses, civilian deaths, displacement, and the denial of humanitarian access.

Related Concepts:

  • What accusations were made against the Sri Lankan government regarding scorched-earth tactics in 2009?: In the 2009 Sri Lankan Civil War, the United Nations Regional Information Centre accused the Sri Lankan government of employing scorched-earth tactics against the Tamil population.

What is the 'Dahiya doctrine' and how has it been applied in Gaza?

Answer: A strategy of destroying civilian infrastructure to pressure hostile governments, applied in Gaza.

The 'Dahiya doctrine' is an Israeli military strategy involving the destruction of civilian infrastructure to pressure hostile governments, which has been applied in conflicts including Gaza.

Related Concepts:

  • How has the Burmese military used scorched-earth strategies in the Myanmar civil war?: Since the 2021 Myanmar coup d'état, the Burmese military has been accused by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights of using scorched-earth strategies. These actions have resulted in thousands of civilian deaths, displacement of 1.3 million people, and the destruction of 39,000 houses, while also denying humanitarian access.

As of early 2025, what is the reported scale of destruction in Gaza according to UN figures?

Answer: 90% of homes destroyed or damaged, with 60% of buildings affected.

UN figures as of early 2025 indicate that approximately 90% of Gaza's homes have been destroyed or damaged, with 60% of all buildings affected by military operations.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the 'Dahiya doctrine' and how has it been applied in Gaza?: The Dahiya doctrine is an Israeli military strategy involving the destruction of civilian infrastructure to pressure hostile governments. It was applied during the 2006 Lebanon War and again in Israel's 2023 military operations in Gaza, leading to widespread destruction of buildings, agricultural land, and infrastructure.

Figurative and Legal Dimensions

The 1977 Geneva Conventions permit the destruction of civilian food supplies if it is done to prevent them from falling into enemy hands.

Answer: False

The 1977 Geneva Conventions, specifically Additional Protocol II, explicitly prohibit the destruction of objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, including foodstuffs, agricultural areas, crops, and drinking water installations, regardless of the motive.

Related Concepts:

  • What international agreement prohibits scorched-earth tactics against non-combatants?: The 1977 Geneva Conventions, specifically Additional Protocol II, prohibits attacking, destroying, removing, or rendering useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, such as food, livestock, and water installations, for the purpose of denying them to the civilian population or the adverse Party.
  • What specific prohibition is detailed in the 1977 Geneva Conventions regarding scorched-earth tactics?: The Geneva Conventions prohibit the destruction of essential civilian resources like foodstuffs, agricultural areas, crops, livestock, drinking water installations, and irrigation works. This prohibition applies regardless of the motive, whether it's to starve civilians, force their relocation, or any other reason.

In the business world, a 'scorched-earth defense' is a strategy where a company makes itself more attractive to a potential acquirer by selling off valuable assets.

Answer: False

In business, a 'scorched-earth defense' strategy involves making a company less attractive to a potential acquirer, often by selling off valuable assets or taking other actions that diminish its desirability.

Related Concepts:

  • How is the concept of scorched earth applied in the business world?: In the business world, the term 'scorched-earth defense' is used figuratively. It describes a strategy where a company facing a takeover attempts to make itself less attractive or valuable by selling off key assets or taking other actions that diminish its worth to the potential acquirer.

Scorched-earth tactics directed against civilian populations are permitted under international law as long as they are militarily necessary.

Answer: False

International law, particularly the 1977 Geneva Conventions, prohibits scorched-earth tactics directed against civilian populations and objects indispensable for their survival, regardless of military necessity.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the legal status of scorched-earth tactics against civilian populations?: Scorched-earth tactics directed against civilian populations are prohibited under international law, specifically by the 1977 Geneva Conventions. These conventions forbid the destruction of essential resources necessary for civilian survival.

Which international agreement specifically prohibits scorched-earth tactics against non-combatants?

Answer: The 1977 Geneva Conventions, Additional Protocol II

The 1977 Geneva Conventions, particularly Additional Protocol II, explicitly prohibit attacks on objects indispensable for the survival of the civilian population, effectively prohibiting scorched-earth tactics against non-combatants.

Related Concepts:

  • What international agreement prohibits scorched-earth tactics against non-combatants?: The 1977 Geneva Conventions, specifically Additional Protocol II, prohibits attacking, destroying, removing, or rendering useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, such as food, livestock, and water installations, for the purpose of denying them to the civilian population or the adverse Party.
  • What specific prohibition is detailed in the 1977 Geneva Conventions regarding scorched-earth tactics?: The Geneva Conventions prohibit the destruction of essential civilian resources like foodstuffs, agricultural areas, crops, livestock, drinking water installations, and irrigation works. This prohibition applies regardless of the motive, whether it's to starve civilians, force their relocation, or any other reason.

In the business world, what does a 'scorched-earth defense' strategy typically involve?

Answer: Selling off key assets to make the company less attractive.

In business, a 'scorched-earth defense' strategy involves actions like selling off key assets to make a company less attractive to a potential acquirer.

Related Concepts:

  • How is the concept of scorched earth applied in the business world?: In the business world, the term 'scorched-earth defense' is used figuratively. It describes a strategy where a company facing a takeover attempts to make itself less attractive or valuable by selling off key assets or taking other actions that diminish its worth to the potential acquirer.

What is the legal status of scorched-earth tactics against civilian populations under international law?

Answer: Prohibited by the 1977 Geneva Conventions.

Scorched-earth tactics directed against civilian populations are prohibited under international law, specifically by the 1977 Geneva Conventions, which protect objects indispensable for civilian survival.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the legal status of scorched-earth tactics against civilian populations?: Scorched-earth tactics directed against civilian populations are prohibited under international law, specifically by the 1977 Geneva Conventions. These conventions forbid the destruction of essential resources necessary for civilian survival.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy