This is an interactive explainer based on the Wikipedia article on Scorched Earth. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

The Ash & Ember Doctrine

A historical and strategic analysis of the military tactic of systematic destruction, exploring its origins, theory, legal implications, and historical applications.

What is Scorched Earth? ๐Ÿ‘‡ Historical Cases ๐Ÿ“œ

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
๐ŸŽฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ŸŽฎ

Definition

Military Strategy

A scorched-earth policy is a military strategy involving the deliberate destruction of resources and infrastructure that might be useful to an enemy. This includes the systematic elimination of food, water sources, transportation networks, and anything else that could sustain an opposing force or population.

Objectives

The primary objectives are to deny the enemy the ability to wage war by crippling their logistics and resources, or to punish populations perceived as hostile. It can be employed by a retreating force to leave nothing of value behind, or by an advancing force to counter unconventional warfare.

Legal Context

While historically employed, the deliberate targeting of civilian resources and populations through scorched-earth tactics is now prohibited under international humanitarian law, specifically the 1977 Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions. This prohibits actions intended to starve civilians or deny them sustenance value.

Origins of the Term

Early Mentions

The term "scorched earth" gained traction in English during the Second Sino-Japanese War in 1937. Chinese forces employed these tactics, destroying crops and infrastructure to impede the advancing Japanese military.

Ancient Precedents

The practice itself is ancient. Notable historical examples include the Scythians' use of scorched earth against Darius the Great's invading forces in the 6th century BCE, involving the destruction of food supplies and poisoning of wells. Xenophon also documented similar tactics during the March of the Ten Thousand in the 4th century BCE.

Roman and Medieval Use

During the Second Punic War (218โ€“202 BCE), Roman forces under Fabius Maximus instructed civilians to burn their homes and grain to deny resources to Hannibal's army. Later, the destruction of Carthage in 146 BCE involved leveling buildings and burning fields. Medieval conflicts, such as the Wars of Scottish Independence and the Harrying of the North by William the Conqueror, also saw widespread application of these destructive strategies.

Military Theory

Clausewitz's Perspective

Military theorists like Carl von Clausewitz recognized the strategic value of denying resources to the enemy. In his work "On War," he noted that rendering subsistence difficult could disorganize the enemy army and force a disadvantageous retreat, citing Wellington's campaign in Portugal as an example.

Impact on Logistics

Scorched earth directly targets an army's logistical capabilities. By destroying food, water, and shelter, it forces the enemy to rely solely on their own supply lines, which can be stretched thin and become vulnerable. This tactic aims to degrade the enemy's fighting capacity through attrition and deprivation.

Psychological Warfare

Beyond material destruction, scorched earth serves as a potent psychological weapon. The sight of devastated landscapes and the knowledge of deliberate destruction can demoralize enemy combatants and civilian populations, signaling a ruthless determination to win at any cost.

Legal Framework

Geneva Conventions

International humanitarian law, particularly the 1977 Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions, explicitly prohibits scorched-earth tactics when they target objects indispensable for the survival of the civilian population. This includes foodstuffs, water installations, and agricultural areas.

Prohibitions

Article 54 of Protocol I prohibits attacks on objects indispensable for the survival of the civilian population, such as foodstuffs, crops, livestock, drinking water installations, and irrigation works, if the purpose is to deny their sustenance value to the civilian population or the adverse Party. This directly addresses the core intent of many scorched-earth policies.

Distinction and Proportionality

Modern laws of war emphasize the principles of distinction (between combatants and civilians) and proportionality (ensuring military advantage outweighs collateral damage). Scorched-earth tactics often violate these principles due to their indiscriminate and devastating impact on civilian populations and the environment.

Historical Examples

American Civil War

Union generals like William Tecumseh Sherman and Philip Sheridan employed scorched-earth tactics during the American Civil War. Sherman's March to the Sea and Sheridan's Shenandoah Valley campaign involved destroying infrastructure, crops, and supplies to cripple the Confederacy's ability to wage war.

Napoleonic Wars

During Napoleon's invasion of Russia in 1812, the Russian army implemented a devastating scorched-earth strategy. As they retreated, they burned crops, destroyed villages, and poisoned wells, leaving little for the advancing Grande Armรฉe. This tactic, combined with the harsh Russian winter, contributed significantly to Napoleon's defeat.

Second Boer War

British forces, under Lord Kitchener, utilized scorched-earth tactics against Boer civilians during the Second Boer War (1899โ€“1902). Farms were destroyed, and Boer non-combatants were interned in concentration camps to cut off support for guerrilla fighters. This policy resulted in significant civilian casualties due to disease and starvation in the camps.

World War II

During World War II, both sides employed scorched-earth tactics. The Soviet Union destroyed resources as they retreated from the German advance in 1941. Later, German forces implemented similar strategies in occupied territories, notably in the Soviet Union and Northern Finland, to hinder advancing Allied forces and deny them resources.

Business World Analogy

Scorched-Earth Defense

The term "scorched-earth defense" is metaphorically applied in business strategy. It refers to actions taken by a company facing a hostile takeover to make itself less attractive or valuable to the acquirer. This might involve selling off key assets, taking on significant debt, or implementing other measures that diminish the target company's appeal.

Deterrence and Negotiation

Like its military counterpart, a business scorched-earth defense aims to deter the takeover bid or force the acquiring company to negotiate more favorable terms. The goal is to make the acquisition prohibitively expensive or strategically unsound, thereby protecting the company's independence or securing better terms for shareholders.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Scorched Earth" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about scorched_earth while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

References

References

  1.  Naimark 2002, p.ย 46.
A full list of references for this article are available at the Scorched earth Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is derived from publicly available data and may not be entirely comprehensive, accurate, or up-to-date.

This is not military or legal advice. The information provided herein is not a substitute for professional consultation regarding military strategy, international law, or historical analysis. Always consult with qualified experts for specific advice.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided.