This is an analytical overview based on the Wikipedia article for the NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series at Dover Motor Speedway. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

Dover's Concrete Crucible

A comprehensive chronicle of the NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series races at the iconic Dover International Speedway, examining its legacy, champions, and statistics.

Race Overview 👇 View Winners 🏆

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Race Overview

The KDI Office Technology 200

The KDI Office Technology 200 was a significant annual event on the NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series calendar, contested over a distance of 200 miles (approximately 321.87 kilometers) at the renowned Dover International Speedway. Located in Dover, Delaware, this track is famously known as the "Monster Mile" due to its challenging concrete surface and high banking.

Race History

The race was first held in the year 2000 and concluded its run in 2020. Throughout its existence, the event featured various title sponsors, reflecting the dynamic sponsorship landscape within motorsports. Notable past titles include the MBNA e-commerce.com 200, AAA Insurance 200, Lucas Oil 200, and the Bar Harbor 200, among others.

Track Characteristics

Dover International Speedway is a one-mile (1.6 km) concrete oval track featuring four distinct turns. Its consistently high banking and abrasive surface demand precision and endurance from drivers and their equipment, making it a true test of skill and strategy in the Truck Series.

Race Details & Evolution

Race Statistics

The standard race distance was 200 laps, covering 200 miles. However, due to the nature of NASCAR racing and the implementation of overtime rules, some races concluded with more laps. For instance, the 2006 race saw a record time and speed, while several other races were extended by green-white-checker finishes. Conversely, weather conditions sometimes led to shortened events, as seen in 2012.

Notable Race Events

The race schedule experienced shifts over the years. Initially televised on tape delay, it transitioned to live broadcasts from 2012 through its final year in 2020. The 2020 event was notably postponed from its original May date to August due to the global COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the adaptability required in modern event management.

Sponsorship Evolution

The race's title sponsorship evolved significantly, reflecting the commercial partnerships integral to the sport. From MBNA's early involvement to AAA Insurance, Lucas Oil, and finally KDI Office Technology, these sponsorships underscore the commercial appeal and economic importance of hosting a NASCAR Truck Series event at Dover.

Past Winners & Records

Dominant Drivers

Kyle Busch stands out as the most successful driver in the history of this event, securing four victories. Following closely is Johnny Sauter, who achieved three wins at Dover. These drivers demonstrated exceptional skill and consistency on the challenging concrete oval.

# Wins Driver Years Won
4 Kyle Busch 2005, 2011, 2013, 2014
3 Johnny Sauter 2017, 2018, 2019

Top Performing Teams

Several teams have achieved multiple victories at Dover, showcasing their engineering prowess and strategic acumen. Ultra Motorsports, Kyle Busch Motorsports, and GMS Racing each claimed three wins, demonstrating sustained success across different eras of the series. Roush Racing and Billy Ballew Motorsports also secured multiple victories.

# Wins Team Years Won
3 Ultra Motorsports 2001, 2002, 2003
Kyle Busch Motorsports 2011, 2013, 2014
GMS Racing 2017, 2018, 2020
2 Roush Racing 2000, 2006
Billy Ballew Motorsports 2005, 2010
ThorSport Racing 2016, 2019

Manufacturer Dominance

Toyota has historically been the most dominant manufacturer in this event, achieving seven victories. Chevrolet followed with five wins, while Dodge and Ford each secured four wins, illustrating the competitive landscape among the major automotive manufacturers in the Truck Series.

# Wins Make Years Won
7 Toyota 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2016
5 Chevrolet 2005, 2007, 2017, 2018, 2020
4 Dodge 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004
Ford 2000, 2006, 2015, 2019

Comprehensive Race Data

Race Results Table

This table provides a detailed record of each race, including the year, date, winning driver, team, manufacturer, race distance, time, and average speed. It serves as a valuable resource for understanding the historical performance and outcomes of the KDI Office Technology 200.

Year Date No. Driver Team Manufacturer Race Distance Race Time Average Speed
(mph)
Laps Miles (km)
2000 Sept 22 99 Kurt Busch Roush Racing Ford 203* 203 (326.696) 2:05:21 97.168
2001 June 2 2 Scott Riggs Ultra Motorsports Dodge 200 200 (321.868) 2:00:54 99.256
2002 May 31 1 Ted Musgrave Ultra Motorsports Dodge 200 200 (321.868) 1:54:47 104.545
2003 May 30 2 Jason Leffler Ultra Motorsports Dodge 200 200 (321.868) 2:03:25 97.232
2004 June 4 18 Chad Chaffin Bobby Hamilton Racing Dodge 200 200 (321.868) 2:01:13 98.996
2005 June 4 15 Kyle Busch Billy Ballew Motorsports Chevrolet 200 200 (321.868) 2:04:03 96.735
2006 June 2 6 Mark Martin Roush Racing Ford 200 200 (321.868) 1:39:50* 120.2*
2007 June 1 33 Ron Hornaday Jr. Kevin Harvick Inc. Chevrolet 200 200 (321.868) 1:51:40 107.463
2008 May 30 22 Scott Speed Bill Davis Racing Toyota 200 200 (321.868) 1:59:40 100.279
2009 May 30* 16 Brian Scott Xpress Motorsports Toyota 200 200 (321.868) 2:09:17 92.819
2010 May 14 51 Aric Almirola Billy Ballew Motorsports Toyota 204* 204 (328.306) 2:05:03 97.881
2011 May 13 18 Kyle Busch Kyle Busch Motorsports Toyota 200 200 (321.868) 2:00:22 99.695
2012 June 1 11 Todd Bodine Red Horse Racing Toyota 147* 147 (236.573) 1:48:00 81.667
2013 May 31 51 Kyle Busch Kyle Busch Motorsports Toyota 200 200 (321.868) 1:50:05 109.008
2014 May 30 51 Kyle Busch Kyle Busch Motorsports Toyota 200 200 (321.868) 1:57:12 102.389
2015 May 29 19 Tyler Reddick Brad Keselowski Racing Ford 200 200 (321.868) 1:56:31 102.99
2016 May 13 88 Matt Crafton ThorSport Racing Toyota 200 200 (321.868) 1:47:45 111.369
2017 June 2 21 Johnny Sauter GMS Racing Chevrolet 200 200 (321.868) 2:01:03 99.133
2018 May 4 21 Johnny Sauter GMS Racing Chevrolet 210* 210 (337.961) 2:08:04 98.386
2019 May 3 13 Johnny Sauter ThorSport Racing Ford 200 200 (321.868) 1:51:42 107.431
2020 August 21* 21 Zane Smith GMS Racing Chevrolet 200 200 (321.868) 1:48:21 110.752

* Indicates races extended due to overtime rules or shortened due to weather/darkness.

Race Notes

Several factors influenced race outcomes and durations:

  • Record Performance: The 2006 event, won by Mark Martin, set records for both race time and average speed, achieving 120.2 mph.
  • Overtime Finishes: Races in 2000, 2010, and 2018 were extended beyond the scheduled distance due to NASCAR's overtime rules, adding competitive laps.
  • Weather Delays: The 2009 race was postponed from Friday to Saturday due to rain, while the 2012 event was shortened because of inclement weather and fading light.
  • Pandemic Impact: The 2020 race was rescheduled from May to August, demonstrating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the racing calendar.

External Resources

For more detailed historical data and race recaps, consult specialized motorsport archives. The following link provides access to comprehensive race results and statistics for Dover International Speedway events.

Racing-Reference Data ➡️

Team Performance

Top Teams by Wins

The success of a racing team is often measured by its victories. At Dover, Ultra Motorsports, Kyle Busch Motorsports, and GMS Racing have each achieved a remarkable three wins, showcasing their consistent performance and strategic execution over the years. Roush Racing and Billy Ballew Motorsports also feature prominently with multiple victories.

# Wins Team Years Won
3 Ultra Motorsports 2001, 2002, 2003
Kyle Busch Motorsports 2011, 2013, 2014
GMS Racing 2017, 2018, 2020
2 Roush Racing 2000, 2006
Billy Ballew Motorsports 2005, 2010
ThorSport Racing 2016, 2019

Manufacturer Standings

Manufacturer Victories

Toyota has demonstrated the most significant success at Dover in the Truck Series, accumulating seven wins. Chevrolet follows with five victories, while Dodge and Ford have each recorded four wins. This data highlights the competitive balance and manufacturer loyalty within the series.

# Wins Make Years Won
7 Toyota 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2016
5 Chevrolet 2005, 2007, 2017, 2018, 2020
4 Dodge 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004
Ford 2000, 2006, 2015, 2019

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Nascar Craftsman Truck Series At Dover Motor Speedway" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about nascar_craftsman_truck_series_at_dover_motor_speedway while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

References

References

A full list of references for this article are available at the NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series at Dover Motor Speedway Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Academic Disclaimer

Important Notice Regarding Content

This document has been meticulously generated by an advanced AI, drawing exclusively from the provided source material. It is intended strictly for academic and informational purposes, aiming to provide a structured and educational overview of the NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series at Dover Motor Speedway.

This is not professional motorsport analysis or advice. The information presented herein should not be construed as a substitute for expert consultation regarding motorsport history, statistics, or event management. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy based on the source, users are encouraged to cross-reference with primary sources for critical applications.

The creators of this AI-generated content are not liable for any inaccuracies, omissions, or actions taken based on the information presented.