Wiki2Web Studio

Create complete, beautiful interactive educational materials in less than 5 minutes.

Print flashcards, homework worksheets, exams/quizzes, study guides, & more.

Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.

Unsaved Work Found!

It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?



Firearms: Thompson Autorifle and Delayed Blowback Mechanisms

At a Glance

Title: Firearms: Thompson Autorifle and Delayed Blowback Mechanisms

Total Categories: 5

Category Stats

  • Thompson Autorifle: Design and Operation: 8 flashcards, 15 questions
  • Thompson Autorifle: Variants and History: 6 flashcards, 11 questions
  • BSA Autorifle and British Trials: 10 flashcards, 14 questions
  • Delayed Blowback Mechanisms: Concepts and Examples: 6 flashcards, 8 questions
  • Ammunition and Specific Cartridges: 2 flashcards, 4 questions

Total Stats

  • Total Flashcards: 32
  • True/False Questions: 29
  • Multiple Choice Questions: 23
  • Total Questions: 52

Instructions

Click the button to expand the instructions for how to use the Wiki2Web Teacher studio in order to print, edit, and export data about Firearms: Thompson Autorifle and Delayed Blowback Mechanisms

Welcome to Your Curriculum Command Center

This guide will turn you into a Wiki2web Studio power user. Let's unlock the features designed to give you back your weekends.

The Core Concept: What is a "Kit"?

Think of a Kit as your all-in-one digital lesson plan. It's a single, portable file that contains every piece of content for a topic: your subject categories, a central image, all your flashcards, and all your questions. The true power of the Studio is speed—once a kit is made (or you import one), you are just minutes away from printing an entire set of coursework.

Getting Started is Simple:

  • Create New Kit: Start with a clean slate. Perfect for a brand-new lesson idea.
  • Import & Edit Existing Kit: Load a .json kit file from your computer to continue your work or to modify a kit created by a colleague.
  • Restore Session: The Studio automatically saves your progress in your browser. If you get interrupted, you can restore your unsaved work with one click.

Step 1: Laying the Foundation (The Authoring Tools)

This is where you build the core knowledge of your Kit. Use the left-side navigation panel to switch between these powerful authoring modules.

⚙️ Kit Manager: Your Kit's Identity

This is the high-level control panel for your project.

  • Kit Name: Give your Kit a clear title. This will appear on all your printed materials.
  • Master Image: Upload a custom cover image for your Kit. This is essential for giving your content a professional visual identity, and it's used as the main graphic when you export your Kit as an interactive game.
  • Topics: Create the structure for your lesson. Add topics like "Chapter 1," "Vocabulary," or "Key Formulas." All flashcards and questions will be organized under these topics.

🃏 Flashcard Author: Building the Knowledge Blocks

Flashcards are the fundamental concepts of your Kit. Create them here to define terms, list facts, or pose simple questions.

  • Click "➕ Add New Flashcard" to open the editor.
  • Fill in the term/question and the definition/answer.
  • Assign the flashcard to one of your pre-defined topics.
  • To edit or remove a flashcard, simply use the ✏️ (Edit) or ❌ (Delete) icons next to any entry in the list.

✍️ Question Author: Assessing Understanding

Create a bank of questions to test knowledge. These questions are the engine for your worksheets and exams.

  • Click "➕ Add New Question".
  • Choose a Type: True/False for quick checks or Multiple Choice for more complex assessments.
  • To edit an existing question, click the ✏️ icon. You can change the question text, options, correct answer, and explanation at any time.
  • The Explanation field is a powerful tool: the text you enter here will automatically appear on the teacher's answer key and on the Smart Study Guide, providing instant feedback.

🔗 Intelligent Mapper: The Smart Connection

This is the secret sauce of the Studio. The Mapper transforms your content from a simple list into an interconnected web of knowledge, automating the creation of amazing study guides.

  • Step 1: Select a question from the list on the left.
  • Step 2: In the right panel, click on every flashcard that contains a concept required to answer that question. They will turn green, indicating a successful link.
  • The Payoff: When you generate a Smart Study Guide, these linked flashcards will automatically appear under each question as "Related Concepts."

Step 2: The Magic (The Generator Suite)

You've built your content. Now, with a few clicks, turn it into a full suite of professional, ready-to-use materials. What used to take hours of formatting and copying-and-pasting can now be done in seconds.

🎓 Smart Study Guide Maker

Instantly create the ultimate review document. It combines your questions, the correct answers, your detailed explanations, and all the "Related Concepts" you linked in the Mapper into one cohesive, printable guide.

📝 Worksheet & 📄 Exam Builder

Generate unique assessments every time. The questions and multiple-choice options are randomized automatically. Simply select your topics, choose how many questions you need, and generate:

  • A Student Version, clean and ready for quizzing.
  • A Teacher Version, complete with a detailed answer key and the explanations you wrote.

🖨️ Flashcard Printer

Forget wrestling with table layouts in a word processor. Select a topic, choose a cards-per-page layout, and instantly generate perfectly formatted, print-ready flashcard sheets.

Step 3: Saving and Collaborating

  • 💾 Export & Save Kit: This is your primary save function. It downloads the entire Kit (content, images, and all) to your computer as a single .json file. Use this to create permanent backups and share your work with others.
  • ➕ Import & Merge Kit: Combine your work. You can merge a colleague's Kit into your own or combine two of your lessons into a larger review Kit.

You're now ready to reclaim your time.

You're not just a teacher; you're a curriculum designer, and this is your Studio.

This page is an interactive visualization based on the Wikipedia article "Thompson Autorifle" (opens in new tab) and its cited references.

Text content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (opens in new tab). Additional terms may apply.

Disclaimer: This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute any kind of advice. The information is not a substitute for consulting official sources or records or seeking advice from qualified professionals.


Owned and operated by Artificial General Intelligence LLC, a Michigan Registered LLC
Prompt engineering done with Gracekits.com
All rights reserved
Sitemaps | Contact

Export Options





Study Guide: Firearms: Thompson Autorifle and Delayed Blowback Mechanisms

Study Guide: Firearms: Thompson Autorifle and Delayed Blowback Mechanisms

Thompson Autorifle: Design and Operation

The Blish Lock mechanism used in the Thompson Autorifle was designed to speed up the bolt's unlocking process.

Answer: False

The Blish Lock mechanism employed in the Thompson Autorifle was designed to delay the opening of the bolt until internal pressures had decreased to a safe level, not to speed up the unlocking process.

Related Concepts:

  • What is a Blish Lock, and how does it relate to the Thompson Autorifle?: The Blish Lock is a mechanism used in firearms to delay the opening of the bolt during firing. The Thompson Autorifle utilized this lock, which involved an interrupted screw design, to manage the pressure from firing the .30-06 cartridge until it was safe to eject the spent casing.
  • What type of firearm action did the Thompson Autorifle employ?: The Thompson Autorifle employed a delayed blowback operation, specifically using a Blish Lock. This mechanism was designed to delay the opening of the bolt until the gas pressure inside the chamber had decreased to a safe level.
  • How did the Thompson Autorifle's action differ from gas-operated or recoil-operated systems?: The Thompson Autorifle's delayed blowback action, specifically using the Blish Lock, was simpler than gas-operated or recoil-operated systems, which often involve more complex moving parts like gas pistons or long-stroke/short-stroke recoil mechanisms.

The Thompson Autorifle was known for its exceptionally smooth and safe ejection of spent casings.

Answer: False

Contrary to the statement, the Thompson Autorifle was known for its exceptionally violent ejection of spent cartridge casings, which posed a hazard to individuals nearby.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the disadvantages of the Thompson Autorifle's operation?: The Thompson Autorifle had two significant disadvantages: it required lubricated ammunition for reliable functioning, and the ejection of spent cartridge casings was exceptionally violent, posing a hazard to nearby individuals.
  • How did the interrupted screw mechanism function in the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle utilized an interrupted screw delayed blowback operation. The bolt featured 85-degree angled interrupted rear locking lugs that required a 110-degree rotation to unlock, thereby delaying the action until internal pressures dropped to a safe level for casing ejection.
  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.

The Thompson Autorifle's delayed blowback action was considered more complex than typical gas-operated systems.

Answer: False

The Thompson Autorifle's delayed blowback action, utilizing the Blish Lock, was considered simpler than typical gas-operated or recoil-operated systems, which often involve more complex moving parts.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Thompson Autorifle's action differ from gas-operated or recoil-operated systems?: The Thompson Autorifle's delayed blowback action, specifically using the Blish Lock, was simpler than gas-operated or recoil-operated systems, which often involve more complex moving parts like gas pistons or long-stroke/short-stroke recoil mechanisms.
  • How did the interrupted screw mechanism function in the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle utilized an interrupted screw delayed blowback operation. The bolt featured 85-degree angled interrupted rear locking lugs that required a 110-degree rotation to unlock, thereby delaying the action until internal pressures dropped to a safe level for casing ejection.
  • What type of firearm action did the Thompson Autorifle employ?: The Thompson Autorifle employed a delayed blowback operation, specifically using a Blish Lock. This mechanism was designed to delay the opening of the bolt until the gas pressure inside the chamber had decreased to a safe level.

The safety switch and rear sight on the Thompson Autorifle were located at the front of the receiver.

Answer: False

The safety switch and the rear sight on the Thompson Autorifle were located at the rear of the receiver, not the front.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the design of the Thompson Autorifle's receiver and sights?: The receiver of the Thompson Autorifle was round in cross-section. The safety switch and the rear sight were both located at the rear of the receiver.
  • Describe the cocking and firing sequence of the Thompson Autorifle.: The bolt of the Thompson Autorifle cocked the striker on the opening cycle, similar to a Mauser action, and it fired from a closed bolt position. When the trigger was pulled, it activated a lever connected to a sear, initiating the firing sequence.
  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.

The Thompson Autorifle fired from an open bolt position, similar to many submachine guns.

Answer: False

The Thompson Autorifle fired from a closed bolt position. Its bolt cocked the striker on the opening cycle, a mechanism similar to a Mauser action.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the cocking and firing sequence of the Thompson Autorifle.: The bolt of the Thompson Autorifle cocked the striker on the opening cycle, similar to a Mauser action, and it fired from a closed bolt position. When the trigger was pulled, it activated a lever connected to a sear, initiating the firing sequence.
  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.
  • How did the interrupted screw mechanism function in the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle utilized an interrupted screw delayed blowback operation. The bolt featured 85-degree angled interrupted rear locking lugs that required a 110-degree rotation to unlock, thereby delaying the action until internal pressures dropped to a safe level for casing ejection.

The Thompson Autorifle's bolt mechanism involved an interrupted screw design with lugs that rotated 110 degrees to unlock.

Answer: True

The Thompson Autorifle's bolt mechanism incorporated an interrupted screw design, requiring a 110-degree rotation of its lugs to unlock, which served to delay the action.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the interrupted screw mechanism function in the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle utilized an interrupted screw delayed blowback operation. The bolt featured 85-degree angled interrupted rear locking lugs that required a 110-degree rotation to unlock, thereby delaying the action until internal pressures dropped to a safe level for casing ejection.
  • Describe the cocking and firing sequence of the Thompson Autorifle.: The bolt of the Thompson Autorifle cocked the striker on the opening cycle, similar to a Mauser action, and it fired from a closed bolt position. When the trigger was pulled, it activated a lever connected to a sear, initiating the firing sequence.
  • What type of firearm action did the Thompson Autorifle employ?: The Thompson Autorifle employed a delayed blowback operation, specifically using a Blish Lock. This mechanism was designed to delay the opening of the bolt until the gas pressure inside the chamber had decreased to a safe level.

The Thompson Autorifle's design was considered advantageous because it eliminated the need for any form of bolt locking.

Answer: False

The Thompson Autorifle's design utilized an interrupted screw mechanism with locking lugs that required rotation to unlock, thus it did not eliminate the need for bolt locking. Its advantage lay in its relative simplicity compared to other operating systems.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the advantages of the Thompson Autorifle's action?: A key advantage of the Thompson Autorifle's action was its simplicity, as it avoided the complexity associated with recoil-operated and gas-operated firearm actions.
  • How did the Thompson Autorifle's action differ from gas-operated or recoil-operated systems?: The Thompson Autorifle's delayed blowback action, specifically using the Blish Lock, was simpler than gas-operated or recoil-operated systems, which often involve more complex moving parts like gas pistons or long-stroke/short-stroke recoil mechanisms.
  • How did the interrupted screw mechanism function in the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle utilized an interrupted screw delayed blowback operation. The bolt featured 85-degree angled interrupted rear locking lugs that required a 110-degree rotation to unlock, thereby delaying the action until internal pressures dropped to a safe level for casing ejection.

The Thompson Autorifle's bolt cocked the striker during the closing cycle of operation.

Answer: False

The Thompson Autorifle's bolt cocked the striker during the opening cycle of operation, not the closing cycle.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the cocking and firing sequence of the Thompson Autorifle.: The bolt of the Thompson Autorifle cocked the striker on the opening cycle, similar to a Mauser action, and it fired from a closed bolt position. When the trigger was pulled, it activated a lever connected to a sear, initiating the firing sequence.
  • How did the interrupted screw mechanism function in the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle utilized an interrupted screw delayed blowback operation. The bolt featured 85-degree angled interrupted rear locking lugs that required a 110-degree rotation to unlock, thereby delaying the action until internal pressures dropped to a safe level for casing ejection.
  • What type of firearm action did the Thompson Autorifle employ?: The Thompson Autorifle employed a delayed blowback operation, specifically using a Blish Lock. This mechanism was designed to delay the opening of the bolt until the gas pressure inside the chamber had decreased to a safe level.

The Thompson Autorifle's receiver was rectangular in cross-section to accommodate its complex action.

Answer: False

The receiver of the Thompson Autorifle was round in cross-section, not rectangular.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the design of the Thompson Autorifle's receiver and sights?: The receiver of the Thompson Autorifle was round in cross-section. The safety switch and the rear sight were both located at the rear of the receiver.
  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.
  • What were the advantages of the Thompson Autorifle's action?: A key advantage of the Thompson Autorifle's action was its simplicity, as it avoided the complexity associated with recoil-operated and gas-operated firearm actions.

What was the primary operating principle of the Thompson Autorifle?

Answer: Delayed blowback operation, using a Blish Lock mechanism.

The primary operating principle of the Thompson Autorifle was delayed blowback, achieved through the use of its distinctive Blish Lock mechanism.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the cocking and firing sequence of the Thompson Autorifle.: The bolt of the Thompson Autorifle cocked the striker on the opening cycle, similar to a Mauser action, and it fired from a closed bolt position. When the trigger was pulled, it activated a lever connected to a sear, initiating the firing sequence.
  • What were the advantages of the Thompson Autorifle's action?: A key advantage of the Thompson Autorifle's action was its simplicity, as it avoided the complexity associated with recoil-operated and gas-operated firearm actions.
  • How did the interrupted screw mechanism function in the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle utilized an interrupted screw delayed blowback operation. The bolt featured 85-degree angled interrupted rear locking lugs that required a 110-degree rotation to unlock, thereby delaying the action until internal pressures dropped to a safe level for casing ejection.

What was a significant disadvantage associated with the Thompson Autorifle's operation?

Answer: The ejection of spent casings was unusually violent.

A significant disadvantage of the Thompson Autorifle's operation was the exceptionally violent ejection of spent cartridge casings, which posed a hazard to nearby individuals.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the disadvantages of the Thompson Autorifle's operation?: The Thompson Autorifle had two significant disadvantages: it required lubricated ammunition for reliable functioning, and the ejection of spent cartridge casings was exceptionally violent, posing a hazard to nearby individuals.
  • What were the advantages of the Thompson Autorifle's action?: A key advantage of the Thompson Autorifle's action was its simplicity, as it avoided the complexity associated with recoil-operated and gas-operated firearm actions.
  • How did the Thompson Autorifle's action differ from gas-operated or recoil-operated systems?: The Thompson Autorifle's delayed blowback action, specifically using the Blish Lock, was simpler than gas-operated or recoil-operated systems, which often involve more complex moving parts like gas pistons or long-stroke/short-stroke recoil mechanisms.

What was the main advantage cited for the Thompson Autorifle's delayed blowback action compared to other systems?

Answer: Simplicity of design.

The main advantage cited for the Thompson Autorifle's delayed blowback action was its simplicity of design when compared to more complex gas-operated or recoil-operated systems.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the Thompson Autorifle's action differ from gas-operated or recoil-operated systems?: The Thompson Autorifle's delayed blowback action, specifically using the Blish Lock, was simpler than gas-operated or recoil-operated systems, which often involve more complex moving parts like gas pistons or long-stroke/short-stroke recoil mechanisms.
  • What type of firearm action did the Thompson Autorifle employ?: The Thompson Autorifle employed a delayed blowback operation, specifically using a Blish Lock. This mechanism was designed to delay the opening of the bolt until the gas pressure inside the chamber had decreased to a safe level.
  • How did the interrupted screw mechanism function in the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle utilized an interrupted screw delayed blowback operation. The bolt featured 85-degree angled interrupted rear locking lugs that required a 110-degree rotation to unlock, thereby delaying the action until internal pressures dropped to a safe level for casing ejection.

How did the Thompson Autorifle's bolt mechanism delay the unlocking process?

Answer: Through an interrupted screw design requiring rotation.

The Thompson Autorifle's bolt mechanism delayed unlocking through an interrupted screw design, where its locking lugs required a 110-degree rotation to disengage.

Related Concepts:

  • How did the interrupted screw mechanism function in the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle utilized an interrupted screw delayed blowback operation. The bolt featured 85-degree angled interrupted rear locking lugs that required a 110-degree rotation to unlock, thereby delaying the action until internal pressures dropped to a safe level for casing ejection.
  • What type of firearm action did the Thompson Autorifle employ?: The Thompson Autorifle employed a delayed blowback operation, specifically using a Blish Lock. This mechanism was designed to delay the opening of the bolt until the gas pressure inside the chamber had decreased to a safe level.
  • Describe the cocking and firing sequence of the Thompson Autorifle.: The bolt of the Thompson Autorifle cocked the striker on the opening cycle, similar to a Mauser action, and it fired from a closed bolt position. When the trigger was pulled, it activated a lever connected to a sear, initiating the firing sequence.

Which of the following describes the receiver and sight location on the Thompson Autorifle?

Answer: Round receiver with sights at the rear.

The Thompson Autorifle featured a round receiver, with both the safety switch and the rear sight located at the rear of the receiver.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the design of the Thompson Autorifle's receiver and sights?: The receiver of the Thompson Autorifle was round in cross-section. The safety switch and the rear sight were both located at the rear of the receiver.
  • Describe the cocking and firing sequence of the Thompson Autorifle.: The bolt of the Thompson Autorifle cocked the striker on the opening cycle, similar to a Mauser action, and it fired from a closed bolt position. When the trigger was pulled, it activated a lever connected to a sear, initiating the firing sequence.
  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.

The Thompson Autorifle's cocking and firing sequence involved:

Answer: Cocked the striker on opening, fired from closed bolt.

The Thompson Autorifle's cocking and firing sequence involved cocking the striker on the opening cycle of the bolt and firing from a closed bolt position.

Related Concepts:

  • Describe the cocking and firing sequence of the Thompson Autorifle.: The bolt of the Thompson Autorifle cocked the striker on the opening cycle, similar to a Mauser action, and it fired from a closed bolt position. When the trigger was pulled, it activated a lever connected to a sear, initiating the firing sequence.
  • How did the interrupted screw mechanism function in the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle utilized an interrupted screw delayed blowback operation. The bolt featured 85-degree angled interrupted rear locking lugs that required a 110-degree rotation to unlock, thereby delaying the action until internal pressures dropped to a safe level for casing ejection.
  • What type of firearm action did the Thompson Autorifle employ?: The Thompson Autorifle employed a delayed blowback operation, specifically using a Blish Lock. This mechanism was designed to delay the opening of the bolt until the gas pressure inside the chamber had decreased to a safe level.

Thompson Autorifle: Variants and History

The Thompson Autorifle was a fully automatic machine gun designed for widespread military adoption.

Answer: False

The Thompson Autorifle was submitted for military trials as a semi-automatic rifle and was not adopted for service. It was designed and manufactured by Auto-Ordnance between 1923 and 1929.

Related Concepts:

  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.
  • Was the Thompson Autorifle adopted by any military forces?: No, despite several prototypes being submitted by Auto-Ordnance to the military for semi-automatic rifle trials, the Thompson Autorifle was not adopted for service.
  • What were the advantages of the Thompson Autorifle's action?: A key advantage of the Thompson Autorifle's action was its simplicity, as it avoided the complexity associated with recoil-operated and gas-operated firearm actions.

Auto-Ordnance Company manufactured the Thompson Autorifle in the United States between 1923 and 1929.

Answer: True

The Auto-Ordnance Company manufactured the Thompson Autorifle in the United States, with its design and development occurring between 1923 and 1929.

Related Concepts:

  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.
  • What was the role of Auto-Ordnance in the development of semi-automatic rifles?: Auto-Ordnance was the manufacturer of the Thompson Autorifle and submitted prototypes of this semi-automatic rifle for military trials. They also held patents that were licensed, for example, to BSA for the development of the BSA Autorifle.
  • What is the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle, also known by various other names such as the Thompson Model 1923 Autoloading Rifle or the .30-06 Model 1923 Semi-Automatic Rifle, was a semi-automatic rifle developed in the United States. It utilized a Blish Lock mechanism to delay the action of the firearm.

Early Thompson Autorifle prototypes utilized 20-round magazines similar to those used in the BAR.

Answer: False

Early prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle utilized 5-round detachable box magazines. The 20-round BAR magazines were adopted in later prototypes.

Related Concepts:

  • What type of magazines were used in later prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle?: Later prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle transitioned to using 20-round magazines, specifically the M1918 BAR magazines.
  • What type of magazine did the early Thompson Autorifle models use, and what was its capacity?: Early prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle used a detachable box magazine with a capacity of 5 rounds. These magazines were also designed to be lubricated by oiled pads.
  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.

The .276 Pedersen cartridge was used in a Thompson Autorifle prototype that competed against John C. Garand's designs.

Answer: True

The .276 Pedersen cartridge was used in the Thompson Autorifle Model 1929 prototype, which competed against designs by John C. Garand in trials that led to the adoption of the M1 Garand.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the .276 Pedersen cartridge in relation to the Thompson Autorifle?: The .276 Pedersen cartridge was used in the Thompson Autorifle Model 1929 prototype. This specific model was tested in a competition against rifles designed by J.D. Pedersen and John C. Garand, a competition that ultimately led to the adoption of the M1 Garand rifle.

The Thompson Autorifle was initially developed using a detachable box magazine with a capacity of 20 rounds.

Answer: False

Initial development of the Thompson Autorifle utilized a 5-round detachable box magazine. Later prototypes transitioned to 20-round magazines.

Related Concepts:

  • What type of magazine did the early Thompson Autorifle models use, and what was its capacity?: Early prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle used a detachable box magazine with a capacity of 5 rounds. These magazines were also designed to be lubricated by oiled pads.
  • What type of magazines were used in later prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle?: Later prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle transitioned to using 20-round magazines, specifically the M1918 BAR magazines.
  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.

The Thompson Autorifle Model 1929, chambered in .276 Pedersen, was ultimately selected for adoption by the US military.

Answer: False

The Thompson Autorifle Model 1929, chambered in .276 Pedersen, competed against John C. Garand's designs but was not ultimately selected for adoption by the US military; the M1 Garand was chosen instead.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the .276 Pedersen cartridge in relation to the Thompson Autorifle?: The .276 Pedersen cartridge was used in the Thompson Autorifle Model 1929 prototype. This specific model was tested in a competition against rifles designed by J.D. Pedersen and John C. Garand, a competition that ultimately led to the adoption of the M1 Garand rifle.
  • What were the primary cartridges chambered for the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was chambered in .30-06 Springfield. The 1923 model was also chambered for 7.62x54mmR Russian rifle rounds, and other variants were designed for .276 Pedersen and .303 British cartridges.
  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.

Which company was responsible for the design and manufacture of the Thompson Autorifle in the United States?

Answer: Auto-Ordnance Company

The Auto-Ordnance Company was responsible for the design and manufacture of the Thompson Autorifle in the United States.

Related Concepts:

  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.
  • What is the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle, also known by various other names such as the Thompson Model 1923 Autoloading Rifle or the .30-06 Model 1923 Semi-Automatic Rifle, was a semi-automatic rifle developed in the United States. It utilized a Blish Lock mechanism to delay the action of the firearm.
  • What was the role of Auto-Ordnance in the development of semi-automatic rifles?: Auto-Ordnance was the manufacturer of the Thompson Autorifle and submitted prototypes of this semi-automatic rifle for military trials. They also held patents that were licensed, for example, to BSA for the development of the BSA Autorifle.

Despite Auto-Ordnance submitting prototypes, what was the outcome regarding military adoption of the Thompson Autorifle?

Answer: It was not adopted for service by any military forces.

Despite the submission of prototypes by Auto-Ordnance for military trials, the Thompson Autorifle was ultimately not adopted for service by any military forces.

Related Concepts:

  • Was the Thompson Autorifle adopted by any military forces?: No, despite several prototypes being submitted by Auto-Ordnance to the military for semi-automatic rifle trials, the Thompson Autorifle was not adopted for service.
  • What was the role of Auto-Ordnance in the development of semi-automatic rifles?: Auto-Ordnance was the manufacturer of the Thompson Autorifle and submitted prototypes of this semi-automatic rifle for military trials. They also held patents that were licensed, for example, to BSA for the development of the BSA Autorifle.
  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.

What type of magazine did *later* prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle use?

Answer: A 20-round BAR magazine.

Later prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle transitioned to using 20-round magazines, specifically the M1918 BAR magazines.

Related Concepts:

  • What type of magazines were used in later prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle?: Later prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle transitioned to using 20-round magazines, specifically the M1918 BAR magazines.
  • What type of magazine did the early Thompson Autorifle models use, and what was its capacity?: Early prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle used a detachable box magazine with a capacity of 5 rounds. These magazines were also designed to be lubricated by oiled pads.
  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.

The Thompson Autorifle Model 1929, chambered in .276 Pedersen, was part of a competition that ultimately led to the adoption of which rifle?

Answer: The M1 Garand

The competition involving the Thompson Autorifle Model 1929 ultimately led to the adoption of the M1 Garand rifle.

Related Concepts:

  • What is the significance of the .276 Pedersen cartridge in relation to the Thompson Autorifle?: The .276 Pedersen cartridge was used in the Thompson Autorifle Model 1929 prototype. This specific model was tested in a competition against rifles designed by J.D. Pedersen and John C. Garand, a competition that ultimately led to the adoption of the M1 Garand rifle.
  • What other firearms did the BSA Autorifle compete against in British trials?: During trials in 1927, the BSA Autorifle competed against a Colt-made Thompson, an 'improved' BSA Thompson, a gas-operated BSA rifle, and the Farquhar Hill rifle.

The Thompson Autorifle's design dates primarily from which period?

Answer: 1923-1929

The design and development of the Thompson Autorifle primarily dates from the period between 1923 and 1929.

Related Concepts:

  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.
  • What is the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle, also known by various other names such as the Thompson Model 1923 Autoloading Rifle or the .30-06 Model 1923 Semi-Automatic Rifle, was a semi-automatic rifle developed in the United States. It utilized a Blish Lock mechanism to delay the action of the firearm.
  • When were the BSA-manufactured Thompson Autorifle variants produced?: The first examples of the BSA-manufactured Thompson Autorifle variants were made in 1924, with an 'improved' variant produced in 1926.

BSA Autorifle and British Trials

The BSA Autorifle was developed independently by Birmingham Small Arms Co. without any licensing agreement.

Answer: False

The BSA Autorifle was developed by Birmingham Small Arms Co. (BSA) under a licensing agreement with the Auto-Ordnance Corp., making it a derivative rather than an independent development.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the BSA Autorifle?: The BSA Autorifle was a British automatic rifle developed by Birmingham Small Arms Co. (BSA) under a licensing agreement with the Auto-Ordnance Corp. It was an improved derivative of the Thompson Autorifle.
  • For what purpose was the BSA Autorifle developed?: The BSA Autorifle was developed and offered for British Army trials during the 1920s. A key requirement for self-loading rifles submitted for these trials was the ability to operate manually.
  • How did the bolt mechanism of the BSA Autorifle function?: Similar to its predecessor, the BSA Autorifle used a bolt with 85-degree angled threads that were delayed by a 90-degree twist. This mechanism prevented the bolt from unlocking until the gas pressure dropped to a safe level for ejection. The bolt also cocked the striker on opening and fired from a closed position.

The BSA Autorifle was designed to function only as a fully automatic weapon.

Answer: False

The BSA Autorifle was designed with the capability for manual operation, a requirement for British Army trials, meaning it was not intended to function solely as a fully automatic weapon.

Related Concepts:

  • What was the BSA Autorifle?: The BSA Autorifle was a British automatic rifle developed by Birmingham Small Arms Co. (BSA) under a licensing agreement with the Auto-Ordnance Corp. It was an improved derivative of the Thompson Autorifle.
  • For what purpose was the BSA Autorifle developed?: The BSA Autorifle was developed and offered for British Army trials during the 1920s. A key requirement for self-loading rifles submitted for these trials was the ability to operate manually.
  • How did the bolt mechanism of the BSA Autorifle function?: Similar to its predecessor, the BSA Autorifle used a bolt with 85-degree angled threads that were delayed by a 90-degree twist. This mechanism prevented the bolt from unlocking until the gas pressure dropped to a safe level for ejection. The bolt also cocked the striker on opening and fired from a closed position.

The BSA Autorifle was chambered in .303 British and typically used a 10-round magazine.

Answer: True

The BSA Autorifle was indeed chambered in .303 British and typically utilized a 10-round box magazine.

Related Concepts:

  • What cartridge was the BSA Autorifle chambered in, and what was its magazine capacity?: The BSA Autorifle was chambered in the .303 British round and fed from a removable 10-round box magazine.
  • What was the BSA Autorifle?: The BSA Autorifle was a British automatic rifle developed by Birmingham Small Arms Co. (BSA) under a licensing agreement with the Auto-Ordnance Corp. It was an improved derivative of the Thompson Autorifle.
  • How did the bolt mechanism of the BSA Autorifle function?: Similar to its predecessor, the BSA Autorifle used a bolt with 85-degree angled threads that were delayed by a 90-degree twist. This mechanism prevented the bolt from unlocking until the gas pressure dropped to a safe level for ejection. The bolt also cocked the striker on opening and fired from a closed position.

The BSA Guns Ltd. manufactured 'heavy rifle' variants of the Thompson Autorifle featured fixed barrels and standard stocks.

Answer: False

The 'heavy rifle' variants manufactured by BSA Guns Ltd. featured folding bipods and finned barrels, not fixed barrels and standard stocks.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific models did BSA Guns Ltd. manufacture based on the Thompson Autorifle patents?: BSA Guns Ltd., as a licensee, manufactured a small number of 1923 model Thompsons referred to as 'heavy rifles'. These featured folding bipods and finned barrels, and existed in both Rifle and Light Machine Gun variants, with six of each type produced.
  • When were the BSA-manufactured Thompson Autorifle variants produced?: The first examples of the BSA-manufactured Thompson Autorifle variants were made in 1924, with an 'improved' variant produced in 1926.
  • What was the BSA Autorifle?: The BSA Autorifle was a British automatic rifle developed by Birmingham Small Arms Co. (BSA) under a licensing agreement with the Auto-Ordnance Corp. It was an improved derivative of the Thompson Autorifle.

The 'improved' BSA Thompson variant featured a longer operating cycle and a side-mounted cocking handle.

Answer: False

The 'improved' BSA Thompson variant featured a shorter operating cycle and a straight-pull cocking handle, not a longer cycle or a side-mounted handle.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the operational differences in the 'improved' BSA Thompson?: The 'improved' BSA Thompson featured a shorter operating cycle and incorporated a straight-pull cocking handle located at the rear of the cocking sleeve.
  • When were the BSA-manufactured Thompson Autorifle variants produced?: The first examples of the BSA-manufactured Thompson Autorifle variants were made in 1924, with an 'improved' variant produced in 1926.
  • What specific models did BSA Guns Ltd. manufacture based on the Thompson Autorifle patents?: BSA Guns Ltd., as a licensee, manufactured a small number of 1923 model Thompsons referred to as 'heavy rifles'. These featured folding bipods and finned barrels, and existed in both Rifle and Light Machine Gun variants, with six of each type produced.

The BSA Autorifle was tested in British trials alongside rifles made by Colt and Farquhar Hill.

Answer: True

The BSA Autorifle was tested in British trials in 1927 alongside a Colt-made Thompson, an 'improved' BSA Thompson, a gas-operated BSA rifle, and the Farquhar Hill rifle.

Related Concepts:

  • What other firearms did the BSA Autorifle compete against in British trials?: During trials in 1927, the BSA Autorifle competed against a Colt-made Thompson, an 'improved' BSA Thompson, a gas-operated BSA rifle, and the Farquhar Hill rifle.
  • Did the BSA Autorifle succeed in the British trials?: Although reports from 1928 indicated the BSA Autorifle narrowly outperformed the 'improved' BSA and the Farquhar Hill, it ultimately did not advance past the prototype stage, as none of the tested rifles were found acceptable.
  • What was the BSA Autorifle?: The BSA Autorifle was a British automatic rifle developed by Birmingham Small Arms Co. (BSA) under a licensing agreement with the Auto-Ordnance Corp. It was an improved derivative of the Thompson Autorifle.

The BSA Autorifle was designed to meet the British Army's requirement for manual operation capability.

Answer: True

The BSA Autorifle was specifically designed to fulfill the British Army's requirement for self-loading rifles that could also be operated manually, a crucial criterion for their trials.

Related Concepts:

  • For what purpose was the BSA Autorifle developed?: The BSA Autorifle was developed and offered for British Army trials during the 1920s. A key requirement for self-loading rifles submitted for these trials was the ability to operate manually.
  • What was the BSA Autorifle?: The BSA Autorifle was a British automatic rifle developed by Birmingham Small Arms Co. (BSA) under a licensing agreement with the Auto-Ordnance Corp. It was an improved derivative of the Thompson Autorifle.
  • How did the bolt mechanism of the BSA Autorifle function?: Similar to its predecessor, the BSA Autorifle used a bolt with 85-degree angled threads that were delayed by a 90-degree twist. This mechanism prevented the bolt from unlocking until the gas pressure dropped to a safe level for ejection. The bolt also cocked the striker on opening and fired from a closed position.

The BSA Guns Ltd. produced six Light Machine Gun variants based on the Thompson Autorifle patents.

Answer: True

BSA Guns Ltd. produced six Light Machine Gun variants, alongside six Rifle variants, based on the Thompson Autorifle patents.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific models did BSA Guns Ltd. manufacture based on the Thompson Autorifle patents?: BSA Guns Ltd., as a licensee, manufactured a small number of 1923 model Thompsons referred to as 'heavy rifles'. These featured folding bipods and finned barrels, and existed in both Rifle and Light Machine Gun variants, with six of each type produced.
  • What was the BSA Autorifle?: The BSA Autorifle was a British automatic rifle developed by Birmingham Small Arms Co. (BSA) under a licensing agreement with the Auto-Ordnance Corp. It was an improved derivative of the Thompson Autorifle.
  • When were the BSA-manufactured Thompson Autorifle variants produced?: The first examples of the BSA-manufactured Thompson Autorifle variants were made in 1924, with an 'improved' variant produced in 1926.

What feature allowed the BSA Autorifle to be operated manually, a requirement for British trials?

Answer: Disconnecting shutters around the bolt head.

The BSA Autorifle featured disconnecting shutters around the bolt head. Moving these shutters allowed the mechanism to be disconnected, enabling manual operation of the rifle.

Related Concepts:

  • For what purpose was the BSA Autorifle developed?: The BSA Autorifle was developed and offered for British Army trials during the 1920s. A key requirement for self-loading rifles submitted for these trials was the ability to operate manually.
  • How did the BSA Autorifle allow for manual operation?: The BSA Autorifle featured two curved 'shutters' around the bolt head. By moving these shutters into the down position, the mechanism could be disconnected, allowing the rifle to be used as a manually loaded firearm.
  • How did the bolt mechanism of the BSA Autorifle function?: Similar to its predecessor, the BSA Autorifle used a bolt with 85-degree angled threads that were delayed by a 90-degree twist. This mechanism prevented the bolt from unlocking until the gas pressure dropped to a safe level for ejection. The bolt also cocked the striker on opening and fired from a closed position.

The BSA Autorifle was developed primarily for:

Answer: Trials by the British Army.

The BSA Autorifle was developed and offered primarily for trials conducted by the British Army.

Related Concepts:

  • For what purpose was the BSA Autorifle developed?: The BSA Autorifle was developed and offered for British Army trials during the 1920s. A key requirement for self-loading rifles submitted for these trials was the ability to operate manually.
  • What was the BSA Autorifle?: The BSA Autorifle was a British automatic rifle developed by Birmingham Small Arms Co. (BSA) under a licensing agreement with the Auto-Ordnance Corp. It was an improved derivative of the Thompson Autorifle.
  • How did the BSA Autorifle allow for manual operation?: The BSA Autorifle featured two curved 'shutters' around the bolt head. By moving these shutters into the down position, the mechanism could be disconnected, allowing the rifle to be used as a manually loaded firearm.

What was the outcome of the 1927 British trials for the BSA Autorifle?

Answer: It did not advance past the prototype stage as none were acceptable.

Despite some reports suggesting it narrowly outperformed competitors, the BSA Autorifle did not advance past the prototype stage in the 1927 British trials, as none of the rifles were deemed acceptable for adoption.

Related Concepts:

  • Did the BSA Autorifle succeed in the British trials?: Although reports from 1928 indicated the BSA Autorifle narrowly outperformed the 'improved' BSA and the Farquhar Hill, it ultimately did not advance past the prototype stage, as none of the tested rifles were found acceptable.
  • What other firearms did the BSA Autorifle compete against in British trials?: During trials in 1927, the BSA Autorifle competed against a Colt-made Thompson, an 'improved' BSA Thompson, a gas-operated BSA rifle, and the Farquhar Hill rifle.
  • For what purpose was the BSA Autorifle developed?: The BSA Autorifle was developed and offered for British Army trials during the 1920s. A key requirement for self-loading rifles submitted for these trials was the ability to operate manually.

What distinguishes the 'improved' BSA Thompson variant from earlier models?

Answer: It featured a shorter operating cycle and a straight-pull cocking handle.

The 'improved' BSA Thompson variant was distinguished by its shorter operating cycle and the incorporation of a straight-pull cocking handle.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the operational differences in the 'improved' BSA Thompson?: The 'improved' BSA Thompson featured a shorter operating cycle and incorporated a straight-pull cocking handle located at the rear of the cocking sleeve.
  • When were the BSA-manufactured Thompson Autorifle variants produced?: The first examples of the BSA-manufactured Thompson Autorifle variants were made in 1924, with an 'improved' variant produced in 1926.
  • What specific models did BSA Guns Ltd. manufacture based on the Thompson Autorifle patents?: BSA Guns Ltd., as a licensee, manufactured a small number of 1923 model Thompsons referred to as 'heavy rifles'. These featured folding bipods and finned barrels, and existed in both Rifle and Light Machine Gun variants, with six of each type produced.

How many BSA-manufactured 'heavy rifle' variants were produced according to the source?

Answer: Six Rifle variants and six Light Machine Gun variants.

According to the source, BSA Guns Ltd. produced six Rifle variants and six Light Machine Gun variants of the 'heavy rifle' type based on Thompson Autorifle patents.

Related Concepts:

  • What specific models did BSA Guns Ltd. manufacture based on the Thompson Autorifle patents?: BSA Guns Ltd., as a licensee, manufactured a small number of 1923 model Thompsons referred to as 'heavy rifles'. These featured folding bipods and finned barrels, and existed in both Rifle and Light Machine Gun variants, with six of each type produced.

What was the relationship between the BSA Autorifle and the original Thompson Autorifle?

Answer: The BSA Autorifle was a licensed, improved derivative.

The BSA Autorifle was a licensed derivative of the original Thompson Autorifle, developed by Birmingham Small Arms Co. (BSA) and considered an improved version.

Related Concepts:

  • When were the BSA-manufactured Thompson Autorifle variants produced?: The first examples of the BSA-manufactured Thompson Autorifle variants were made in 1924, with an 'improved' variant produced in 1926.
  • What was the BSA Autorifle?: The BSA Autorifle was a British automatic rifle developed by Birmingham Small Arms Co. (BSA) under a licensing agreement with the Auto-Ordnance Corp. It was an improved derivative of the Thompson Autorifle.
  • How did the bolt mechanism of the BSA Autorifle function?: Similar to its predecessor, the BSA Autorifle used a bolt with 85-degree angled threads that were delayed by a 90-degree twist. This mechanism prevented the bolt from unlocking until the gas pressure dropped to a safe level for ejection. The bolt also cocked the striker on opening and fired from a closed position.

Delayed Blowback Mechanisms: Concepts and Examples

The M50 Reising submachine gun is an example of a firearm using a gas-delayed blowback system.

Answer: False

The M50 Reising submachine gun is listed as an example of a firearm employing a 'hesitation locked' system, not a gas-delayed blowback system.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some examples of firearms that employ a gas-delayed blowback system?: Firearms listed with a gas-delayed blowback system include the Heckler & Koch P7 pistol, the Steyr GB pistol, and the Volkssturmgewehr 1-5.

Delayed blowback firearms are designed to operate identically to simple blowback systems but with more powerful cartridges.

Answer: False

Delayed blowback firearms differ from simple blowback systems by intentionally slowing the bolt's opening. This delay allows internal pressures to decrease before ejection, enabling the use of more powerful cartridges, rather than operating identically.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'delayed blowback' refer to in firearms?: Delayed blowback is a firearm operating principle where the bolt is intentionally held closed slightly longer than in a simple blowback system. This delay allows the pressure within the cartridge case to drop to a safer level before the bolt unlocks and the breech opens, enabling the use of more powerful cartridges in blowback-operated firearms.
  • What were the different categories of delayed blowback firearms listed in the provided text?: The text lists several categories of delayed blowback firearms: Lever delayed, Roller delayed, Gas delayed, Hesitation locked, Flywheel delayed, Radial delayed, Screw/Turnbolt delayed, and Toggle delayed.
  • Can you name some firearms that utilize a roller-delayed blowback system?: Examples of firearms using a roller-delayed blowback system include various Heckler & Koch models such as the G3, MP5, and HK21, as well as the CETME rifle and the SIG 510.

The FAMAS rifle utilizes a lever-delayed blowback operating principle.

Answer: True

The FAMAS rifle is categorized under 'Lever delayed' blowback firearms, indicating its operation involves a lever system to delay the bolt's action.

Related Concepts:

  • What type of action does the FAMAS rifle use, as indicated by the navbox image?: The navbox includes an image related to the FAMAS rifle, which is categorized under 'Lever delayed' blowback firearms, suggesting its operating principle involves a lever system to delay the bolt's action.

The Heckler & Koch G3 rifle is an example of a firearm employing a gas-delayed blowback system.

Answer: False

The Heckler & Koch G3 rifle employs a roller-delayed blowback system, not a gas-delayed blowback system. Examples of gas-delayed blowback firearms include the H&K P7 pistol and the Steyr GB pistol.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some examples of firearms that employ a gas-delayed blowback system?: Firearms listed with a gas-delayed blowback system include the Heckler & Koch P7 pistol, the Steyr GB pistol, and the Volkssturmgewehr 1-5.
  • Can you name some firearms that utilize a roller-delayed blowback system?: Examples of firearms using a roller-delayed blowback system include various Heckler & Koch models such as the G3, MP5, and HK21, as well as the CETME rifle and the SIG 510.
  • What does the term 'delayed blowback' refer to in firearms?: Delayed blowback is a firearm operating principle where the bolt is intentionally held closed slightly longer than in a simple blowback system. This delay allows the pressure within the cartridge case to drop to a safer level before the bolt unlocks and the breech opens, enabling the use of more powerful cartridges in blowback-operated firearms.

Which of the following firearms is mentioned as utilizing a roller-delayed blowback system?

Answer: Heckler & Koch MP5

The Heckler & Koch MP5 is mentioned as an example of a firearm utilizing a roller-delayed blowback system.

Related Concepts:

  • Can you name some firearms that utilize a roller-delayed blowback system?: Examples of firearms using a roller-delayed blowback system include various Heckler & Koch models such as the G3, MP5, and HK21, as well as the CETME rifle and the SIG 510.
  • What were the different categories of delayed blowback firearms listed in the provided text?: The text lists several categories of delayed blowback firearms: Lever delayed, Roller delayed, Gas delayed, Hesitation locked, Flywheel delayed, Radial delayed, Screw/Turnbolt delayed, and Toggle delayed.
  • What are some examples of firearms that employ a gas-delayed blowback system?: Firearms listed with a gas-delayed blowback system include the Heckler & Koch P7 pistol, the Steyr GB pistol, and the Volkssturmgewehr 1-5.

Which of these is an example of a firearm using a gas-delayed blowback system, according to the source?

Answer: Heckler & Koch P7 pistol

According to the source, the Heckler & Koch P7 pistol is an example of a firearm that utilizes a gas-delayed blowback system.

Related Concepts:

  • What are some examples of firearms that employ a gas-delayed blowback system?: Firearms listed with a gas-delayed blowback system include the Heckler & Koch P7 pistol, the Steyr GB pistol, and the Volkssturmgewehr 1-5.
  • Can you name some firearms that utilize a roller-delayed blowback system?: Examples of firearms using a roller-delayed blowback system include various Heckler & Koch models such as the G3, MP5, and HK21, as well as the CETME rifle and the SIG 510.
  • What does the term 'delayed blowback' refer to in firearms?: Delayed blowback is a firearm operating principle where the bolt is intentionally held closed slightly longer than in a simple blowback system. This delay allows the pressure within the cartridge case to drop to a safer level before the bolt unlocks and the breech opens, enabling the use of more powerful cartridges in blowback-operated firearms.

What is the fundamental concept behind 'delayed blowback' operation in firearms?

Answer: The bolt's opening is intentionally slowed down to reduce pressure before ejection.

The fundamental concept of delayed blowback is to intentionally slow the bolt's opening after firing, allowing internal cartridge pressure to decrease to a safer level before the breech opens and the spent casing is ejected.

Related Concepts:

  • What does the term 'delayed blowback' refer to in firearms?: Delayed blowback is a firearm operating principle where the bolt is intentionally held closed slightly longer than in a simple blowback system. This delay allows the pressure within the cartridge case to drop to a safer level before the bolt unlocks and the breech opens, enabling the use of more powerful cartridges in blowback-operated firearms.
  • What were the different categories of delayed blowback firearms listed in the provided text?: The text lists several categories of delayed blowback firearms: Lever delayed, Roller delayed, Gas delayed, Hesitation locked, Flywheel delayed, Radial delayed, Screw/Turnbolt delayed, and Toggle delayed.

Which of these delayed blowback systems is exemplified by the FAMAS rifle?

Answer: Lever delayed

The FAMAS rifle is categorized under 'Lever delayed' blowback firearms, indicating its operating principle involves a lever system to delay the bolt's action.

Related Concepts:

  • What type of action does the FAMAS rifle use, as indicated by the navbox image?: The navbox includes an image related to the FAMAS rifle, which is categorized under 'Lever delayed' blowback firearms, suggesting its operating principle involves a lever system to delay the bolt's action.
  • What does the term 'delayed blowback' refer to in firearms?: Delayed blowback is a firearm operating principle where the bolt is intentionally held closed slightly longer than in a simple blowback system. This delay allows the pressure within the cartridge case to drop to a safer level before the bolt unlocks and the breech opens, enabling the use of more powerful cartridges in blowback-operated firearms.
  • Can you name some firearms that utilize a roller-delayed blowback system?: Examples of firearms using a roller-delayed blowback system include various Heckler & Koch models such as the G3, MP5, and HK21, as well as the CETME rifle and the SIG 510.

Ammunition and Specific Cartridges

The Thompson Autorifle was chambered exclusively in the .30-06 Springfield cartridge.

Answer: False

The Thompson Autorifle was chambered in multiple cartridges, including .30-06 Springfield, 7.62x54mmR Russian, .276 Pedersen, and .303 British, not exclusively .30-06 Springfield.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the primary cartridges chambered for the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was chambered in .30-06 Springfield. The 1923 model was also chambered for 7.62x54mmR Russian rifle rounds, and other variants were designed for .276 Pedersen and .303 British cartridges.
  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.
  • What is the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle, also known by various other names such as the Thompson Model 1923 Autoloading Rifle or the .30-06 Model 1923 Semi-Automatic Rifle, was a semi-automatic rifle developed in the United States. It utilized a Blish Lock mechanism to delay the action of the firearm.

The Thompson Autorifle required ammunition with specific lubrication for reliable functioning.

Answer: True

Reliable functioning of the Thompson Autorifle necessitated the use of lubricated ammunition, which was identified as one of its significant operational disadvantages.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the disadvantages of the Thompson Autorifle's operation?: The Thompson Autorifle had two significant disadvantages: it required lubricated ammunition for reliable functioning, and the ejection of spent cartridge casings was exceptionally violent, posing a hazard to nearby individuals.
  • How did the interrupted screw mechanism function in the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle utilized an interrupted screw delayed blowback operation. The bolt featured 85-degree angled interrupted rear locking lugs that required a 110-degree rotation to unlock, thereby delaying the action until internal pressures dropped to a safe level for casing ejection.
  • Who designed and manufactured the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was designed between 1923 and 1929 and manufactured by the Auto-Ordnance Company in the United States.

Which cartridge was NOT mentioned as being chambered for the Thompson Autorifle or its variants?

Answer: 8mm Mauser

The cartridges mentioned as being chambered for the Thompson Autorifle or its variants are .30-06 Springfield, 7.62x54mmR Russian, .276 Pedersen, and .303 British. 8mm Mauser was not mentioned.

Related Concepts:

  • What were the primary cartridges chambered for the Thompson Autorifle?: The Thompson Autorifle was chambered in .30-06 Springfield. The 1923 model was also chambered for 7.62x54mmR Russian rifle rounds, and other variants were designed for .276 Pedersen and .303 British cartridges.
  • What type of magazine did the early Thompson Autorifle models use, and what was its capacity?: Early prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle used a detachable box magazine with a capacity of 5 rounds. These magazines were also designed to be lubricated by oiled pads.
  • What type of magazines were used in later prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle?: Later prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle transitioned to using 20-round magazines, specifically the M1918 BAR magazines.

What was the purpose of the oiled pads mentioned in relation to early Thompson Autorifle magazines?

Answer: To provide lubrication for reliable functioning.

The oiled pads mentioned in relation to early Thompson Autorifle magazines served the purpose of providing lubrication for reliable functioning of the ammunition feed.

Related Concepts:

  • What type of magazine did the early Thompson Autorifle models use, and what was its capacity?: Early prototypes of the Thompson Autorifle used a detachable box magazine with a capacity of 5 rounds. These magazines were also designed to be lubricated by oiled pads.

Home | Sitemaps | Contact | Terms | Privacy