Export your learner materials as an interactive game, a webpage, or FAQ style cheatsheet.
Unsaved Work Found!
It looks like you have unsaved work from a previous session. Would you like to restore it?
Total Categories: 6
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) was exclusively known as the Franklin-Bouillon Agreement in international diplomatic circles.
Answer: False
The 1921 agreement is known by several names, including the Ankara Agreement, Accord of Ankara, Franklin-Bouillon Agreement, and Franco-Turkish Agreement of Ankara, indicating it was not exclusively known by one name.
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) was signed in Istanbul on October 20, 1921.
Answer: False
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) was signed in Ankara, not Istanbul, on October 20, 1921.
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) officially concluded the Greco-Turkish War.
Answer: False
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) officially concluded the Franco-Turkish War, which was part of the broader Turkish War of Independence, not the Greco-Turkish War.
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) was one of several crucial agreements made during the Turkish War of Independence.
Answer: True
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) was indeed one of several pivotal agreements concluded during the Turkish War of Independence, a period of significant geopolitical restructuring.
The inclusion of the Treaty of Ankara (1921) in the 'Treaties of Turkey' navigation box indicates it is a minor diplomatic agreement.
Answer: False
The inclusion of the Treaty of Ankara (1921) in the 'Treaties of Turkey' navigation box indicates that it is considered a pivotal diplomatic agreement and a foundational document in the establishment of the modern Turkish state, not a minor one.
The Partition of the Ottoman Empire referred to the division of former Ottoman territories among the Allied powers after World War I.
Answer: True
The Partition of the Ottoman Empire indeed referred to the division of former Ottoman territories among the Allied powers following World War I, which the Turkish National Movement resisted.
The availability of the Franco-Turkish agreement in both French and English primarily served to limit its international understanding.
Answer: False
The availability of the Franco-Turkish agreement in both French and English highlights its importance for international diplomacy and historical record-keeping, ensuring broader understanding and legal interpretation, not limiting it.
Which of the following is NOT an alternative name for the 1921 agreement between France and the Grand National Assembly of Turkey?
Answer: Treaty of Sèvres
The Treaty of Sèvres was an earlier agreement that defined the Syria-Turkey border, which was later revised by the Treaty of Ankara, and is not an alternative name for the 1921 agreement.
When was the Treaty of Ankara (1921) officially signed?
Answer: 20 October 1921
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) was officially signed on October 20, 1921, in Ankara.
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) officially brought an end to which conflict?
Answer: The Franco-Turkish War
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) formally concluded the Franco-Turkish War, a conflict that was part of the broader Turkish War of Independence.
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) was part of the broader historical context of:
Answer: The Turkish War of Independence
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) was one of several crucial agreements made during the Turkish War of Independence, a period when the Turkish National Movement resisted the partition of the Ottoman Empire.
What was the general geopolitical situation that led to the Franco-Turkish War and the subsequent Treaty of Ankara?
Answer: The aftermath of World War I, dissolution of the Ottoman Empire, and Allied attempts to partition its territories.
The Franco-Turkish War and the subsequent Treaty of Ankara arose from the geopolitical situation following World War I, specifically the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire and the Allied powers' attempts to partition its territories, which provoked resistance from the Turkish National Movement.
What is the significance of the Franco-Turkish agreement of Ankara being available in both French and English?
Answer: It highlights its importance for international diplomacy and broader understanding.
The availability of the Franco-Turkish agreement in both French and English underscores its importance for international diplomacy and historical record-keeping, ensuring broader comprehension and legal interpretation by both signatory nations and the wider international community.
The primary signatories of the Treaty of Ankara (1921) were France and the Ottoman Empire.
Answer: False
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) was signed between France and the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, representing the emerging Turkish state, not the Ottoman Empire.
Henry Franklin-Bouillon signed the Treaty of Ankara (1921) on behalf of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey.
Answer: False
Henry Franklin-Bouillon was the French diplomat who signed the treaty, while Turkish foreign minister Yusuf Kemal Bey signed on behalf of the Grand National Assembly of Turkey.
Henry Franklin-Bouillon was the Turkish foreign minister who signed the Treaty of Ankara (1921).
Answer: False
Henry Franklin-Bouillon was the French diplomat who signed the treaty, while Yusuf Kemal Bey was the Turkish foreign minister.
The Grand National Assembly of Turkey represented the provisional government established by Turkish nationalists during the War of Independence.
Answer: True
The Grand National Assembly of Turkey represented the provisional government established by Turkish nationalists in Ankara during the Turkish War of Independence, acting as the de facto government of the emerging Turkish state.
Who were the two principal entities that signed the Treaty of Ankara (1921)?
Answer: France and the Grand National Assembly of Turkey
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) was signed between France and the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, representing the emerging Turkish state.
Which French diplomat signed the Treaty of Ankara (1921)?
Answer: Henry Franklin-Bouillon
Henry Franklin-Bouillon was the French diplomat who signed the Treaty of Ankara (1921) on behalf of France.
What political entity did Yusuf Kemal Bey represent when signing the Treaty of Ankara (1921)?
Answer: The Grand National Assembly of Turkey
Yusuf Kemal Bey, as the Turkish foreign minister, signed the Treaty of Ankara (1921) representing the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, the provisional government of Turkish nationalists.
France ceded large areas of land to Turkey as per the terms of the Ankara Agreement.
Answer: True
The Ankara Agreement stipulated that France would cede substantial areas of land to Turkey, acknowledging the cessation of the Franco-Turkish War.
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) maintained the Syria-Turkey border as previously defined by the 1920 Treaty of Sèvres without alteration.
Answer: False
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) altered the Syria-Turkey border, which had been defined by the 1920 Treaty of Sèvres, to Turkey's advantage, ceding significant portions of the Aleppo and Adana vilayets.
The cities of Adana, Marash, and Urfa were among those transferred to Turkey from the Aleppo and Adana vilayets under the treaty.
Answer: True
The cities of Adana, Marash, and Urfa, along with others like Osmaniye, Aintab, Kilis, Mardin, Nusaybin, and Jazirat ibn Umar, were ceded to Turkey from the Aleppo and Adana vilayets.
The new border from Al-Rai followed the Baghdad Railway track, with the railway itself remaining within Syrian territory.
Answer: False
From Al-Rai, the border followed the Baghdad Railway track to Nusaybin, with the border on the Syrian side of the track, ensuring the railway track remained within Turkish territory.
The Aleppo and Adana vilayets were minor administrative divisions within the former Ottoman Empire.
Answer: False
The Aleppo and Adana vilayets were extensive administrative divisions, akin to provinces, within the former Ottoman Empire, not minor ones.
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) contributed to Turkey's territorial losses during its War of Independence.
Answer: False
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) significantly contributed to Turkey's territorial *gains* by transferring large areas of the Aleppo and Adana vilayets from French control to Turkish sovereignty.
The Baghdad Railway was strategically important in the treaty's border definition, with the track remaining in Turkish territory.
Answer: True
The Baghdad Railway was strategically important, and its track remained within Turkish territory, with the border running alongside it on the Syrian side.
The shared use of the old road between Nusaybin and Jazirat ibn Umar was a pragmatic arrangement for cross-border access.
Answer: True
The shared usage of the old road, despite being in Turkish territory, was a pragmatic arrangement to maintain cross-border access and facilitate movement between the two regions.
What did France concede to Turkey as per the terms of the Ankara Agreement?
Answer: Large areas of land
Under the terms of the Ankara Agreement, France ceded substantial areas of land to Turkey.
How did the Treaty of Ankara (1921) modify the Syria-Turkey border previously established by the Treaty of Sèvres?
Answer: It altered the border to Turkey's advantage, ceding portions of Aleppo and Adana vilayets.
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) revised the Syria-Turkey border, initially defined by the 1920 Treaty of Sèvres, to Turkey's advantage, ceding significant portions of the Aleppo and Adana vilayets to Turkish control.
Which of the following cities was NOT among those transferred to Turkey from the Aleppo and Adana vilayets under the treaty?
Answer: Antioch
The cities transferred to Turkey included Adana, Marash, and Urfa, but Antioch is not listed among them in the provided information.
What was the status of the Baghdad Railway track in the border demarcation between Al-Rai and Nusaybin?
Answer: The railway track remained within Turkish territory, with the border on the Syrian side.
From Al-Rai, the border followed the Baghdad Railway track to Nusaybin, with the border situated on the Syrian side of the track, ensuring the railway track remained within Turkish territory.
How did the Treaty of Ankara (1921) impact Turkey's territorial status during its War of Independence?
Answer: It led to Turkey gaining large areas of the Aleppo and Adana vilayets.
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) significantly contributed to Turkey's territorial gains by transferring large areas of the Aleppo and Adana vilayets from French control to Turkish sovereignty.
What was the practical implication of both Turkey and Syria being allowed to use the old road between Nusaybin and Jazirat ibn Umar, even though it was in Turkish territory?
Answer: It suggested a pragmatic arrangement for maintaining cross-border access and facilitating trade.
The shared usage of the old road, despite its location in Turkish territory, suggested a pragmatic arrangement for maintaining cross-border access and facilitating trade or movement between the two regions, acknowledging their inherent interconnectedness.
In return for France's concessions, Turkey acknowledged British imperial sovereignty over the French Mandate of Syria.
Answer: False
In return for France's concessions, the Turkish government acknowledged French imperial sovereignty over the French Mandate of Syria, not British imperial sovereignty.
The Sanjak of Alexandretta was granted special administrative status, including official recognition of the Turkish language.
Answer: True
The Sanjak of Alexandretta was accorded a special administrative status, which included the official recognition of the Turkish language and provisions for the cultural development of its Turkish inhabitants.
The special provisions for the Turkish inhabitants of the Sanjak of Alexandretta were due to their being a minority group requiring protection.
Answer: False
The special provisions for the Turkish inhabitants of the Sanjak of Alexandretta were included because they constituted the largest single ethnoreligious group within that region, not because they were a minority requiring protection.
Article 9 of the Treaty of Ankara (1921) ensured that the Tomb of Suleyman Shah would remain under French ownership.
Answer: False
Article 9 of the treaty stipulated that the Tomb of Suleyman Shah, along with its associated properties, would remain under Turkish ownership, with Turkey having the right to appoint guardians and display its flag.
Suleyman Shah was the founder of the Ottoman Empire.
Answer: False
Suleyman Shah was the grandfather of Osman I, who is recognized as the founder of the Ottoman Empire.
The acknowledgment of French imperial sovereignty over the French Mandate of Syria meant Turkey recognized France's supreme authority over Syria.
Answer: True
The acknowledgment of French imperial sovereignty over the French Mandate of Syria indeed signified Turkey's recognition of France's supreme authority and administrative control over that mandated territory.
The provision for cultural development in Alexandretta aimed to suppress the Turkish language and customs.
Answer: False
The provision for cultural development in Alexandretta aimed to safeguard and promote the language, customs, and identity of the Turkish population within that region, not to suppress them.
Turkey's right to hoist its flag at the Tomb of Suleyman Shah symbolized French sovereignty over the site.
Answer: False
Turkey's right to hoist its flag at the Tomb of Suleyman Shah symbolized Turkey's enduring sovereignty and cultural connection to the site, not French sovereignty.
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) granted Turkey less territorial sovereignty compared to the Treaty of Sèvres.
Answer: False
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) granted Turkey greater territorial sovereignty and control over areas previously claimed by France, effectively revising the more restrictive terms of the Treaty of Sèvres.
In return for France's concessions, what did the Turkish government acknowledge?
Answer: French imperial sovereignty over the French Mandate of Syria
In return for France's territorial concessions, the Turkish government acknowledged French imperial sovereignty over the French Mandate of Syria.
What special administrative provision was made for the Sanjak of Alexandretta in Syria?
Answer: Official recognition of the Turkish language and provisions for cultural development of Turkish inhabitants.
The Sanjak of Alexandretta was granted a special administrative status, including official recognition of the Turkish language and provisions aimed at supporting the cultural development of its Turkish inhabitants.
Why did the Treaty of Ankara (1921) include special provisions for the Turkish inhabitants of the Sanjak of Alexandretta?
Answer: They constituted the largest single ethnoreligious group within that region.
The treaty included special provisions for the Turkish inhabitants of the Sanjak of Alexandretta because they constituted the largest single ethnoreligious group within that region.
According to Article 9 of the Treaty of Ankara (1921), what was the status of the Tomb of Suleyman Shah?
Answer: It remained under Turkish ownership, with rights to appoint guardians and display the Turkish flag.
Article 9 of the treaty stipulated that the Tomb of Suleyman Shah, along with its associated properties, would remain under Turkish ownership, with Turkey granted the right to appoint guardians and display the Turkish flag there.
Who was Suleyman Shah, whose tomb was given special status in the treaty?
Answer: The grandfather of Osman I, founder of the Ottoman Empire
Suleyman Shah was the grandfather of Osman I, who is recognized as the founder of the Ottoman Empire, and his tomb held significant historical and cultural importance.
What does the acknowledgment of French imperial sovereignty over the French Mandate of Syria signify?
Answer: France's supreme authority and administrative control over Syria.
The acknowledgment of French imperial sovereignty over the French Mandate of Syria signifies that Turkey recognized France's supreme authority and administrative control over Syria, a territory governed under a mandate system.
The provision for the cultural development of Turkish inhabitants in Alexandretta aimed to:
Answer: Safeguard and promote their language, customs, and identity.
The provision for the cultural development of the Turkish inhabitants in Alexandretta implied an effort to safeguard and promote the language, customs, and identity of the Turkish population within that region.
What was the symbolic importance of Turkey being allowed to hoist its flag at the Tomb of Suleyman Shah?
Answer: It symbolized Turkey's enduring sovereignty and cultural connection to the site.
The ability for Turkey to hoist its flag at the Tomb of Suleyman Shah symbolized Turkey's enduring sovereignty and profound cultural connection to this historically significant site, reinforcing its national heritage and identity.
What does the term 'appurtenances' refer to in the context of the Tomb of Suleyman Shah in the treaty?
Answer: The associated rights, properties, or structures connected with the tomb.
In the context of the Tomb of Suleyman Shah, 'appurtenances' refers to the associated rights, properties, or structures that are connected with or belong to the tomb, all of which remained under Turkish ownership.
In what key way did the Treaty of Ankara (1921) differ from the Treaty of Sèvres regarding Turkish sovereignty?
Answer: Ankara granted Turkey greater territorial sovereignty and control over areas previously claimed by France.
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) diverged significantly from the Treaty of Sèvres by granting Turkey greater territorial sovereignty and control over areas previously claimed by France, thereby revising some of the more restrictive terms imposed after World War I.
All French military units remaining in Turkey were immediately withdrawn following the Treaty of Ankara (1921).
Answer: False
The treaty stipulated that other French units remaining in Turkey would not be affected, in exchange for economic concessions granted by Turkey.
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) required all French economic interests in Turkey to be immediately terminated.
Answer: False
The treaty stipulated that other French units in Turkey would remain unaffected by the territorial cessions, in exchange for economic concessions granted by Turkey, indicating a continued French economic presence.
How did the Treaty of Ankara (1921) generally affect France's broader regional standing?
Answer: It led to France ceding substantial territories to Turkey while solidifying its mandate over Syria.
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) led to France ceding substantial territories to Turkey and acknowledging the cessation of the Franco-Turkish War, which likely diminished France's direct territorial claims in Anatolia while solidifying its mandate over Syria.
How did the Treaty of Ankara (1921) address France's economic interests in Turkey?
Answer: It stipulated that other French units in Turkey would remain unaffected in exchange for economic concessions from Turkey.
The treaty addressed France's economic interests by stipulating that other French units in Turkey would remain unaffected by the territorial cessions, in exchange for economic concessions granted by Turkey, indicating a continued French economic presence or influence.
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) was formally registered with the League of Nations in 1926.
Answer: True
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) was formally registered in the League of Nations Treaty Series on August 30, 1926.
The annulment of French claims over Turkish land, resulting from the Treaty of Ankara (1921), was later formally recognized in the Armistice of Mudanya.
Answer: True
The Armistice of Mudanya formally recognized the annulment of French claims over Turkish land, which was a consequence of the Treaty of Ankara (1921).
The new border established by the Treaty of Ankara (1921) was subsequently confirmed by the Treaty of Versailles in 1919.
Answer: False
The new border established by the Treaty of Ankara (1921) was subsequently recognized and confirmed in the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923, not the Treaty of Versailles in 1919.
The registration of the Treaty of Ankara (1921) with the League of Nations signified its temporary nature.
Answer: False
The registration of the Treaty of Ankara (1921) with the League of Nations underscored its international legal validity and recognition, indicating its formal and enduring nature, not its temporary status.
The Treaty of Sèvres (1920) was an earlier agreement that initially defined the Syria-Turkey border, which was later revised by the Treaty of Ankara (1921).
Answer: True
The Treaty of Sèvres (1920) was an earlier agreement that initially defined the Syria-Turkey border, and the Treaty of Ankara (1921) subsequently revised this border, granting Turkey more favorable territorial terms.
The Armistice of Mudanya was a peace treaty that replaced the Treaty of Ankara (1921).
Answer: False
The Armistice of Mudanya was a ceasefire agreement that confirmed the annulment of French claims over Turkish land, building upon the Ankara Agreement, but it was not a peace treaty that replaced it.
The Treaty of Lausanne (1923) formally recognized the new border between Syria and Turkey established by the Ankara Agreement.
Answer: True
The Treaty of Lausanne (1923) was a comprehensive peace treaty that formally recognized the new border between Syria and Turkey, which had been established by the Ankara Agreement (1921).
The Treaty of Alexandropol was the only other significant treaty concluded during the Turkish War of Independence besides the Treaty of Ankara.
Answer: False
In addition to the Treaty of Ankara, other significant treaties concluded during the Turkish War of Independence included the Cilicia Peace Treaty, the Treaty of Moscow (1921), the Treaty of Kars, the Armistice of Mudanya, and the Treaty of Lausanne.
When was the Treaty of Ankara (1921) formally registered in the League of Nations Treaty Series?
Answer: 30 August 1926
The Treaty of Ankara (1921) was formally registered in the League of Nations Treaty Series on August 30, 1926.
Which subsequent agreement formally recognized the annulment of French claims over Turkish land, building on the Treaty of Ankara (1921)?
Answer: The Armistice of Mudanya
The annulment of French claims over Turkish land, a consequence of the Treaty of Ankara (1921), was later formally recognized in the Armistice of Mudanya.
Which major treaty confirmed the new border established by the Treaty of Ankara (1921)?
Answer: The Treaty of Lausanne (1923)
The new border established by the Treaty of Ankara (1921) was subsequently recognized and confirmed in the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923.
How did the Treaty of Sèvres (1920) relate to the Treaty of Ankara (1921)?
Answer: Sèvres was an earlier agreement that defined the Syria-Turkey border, which Ankara later revised.
The Treaty of Sèvres (1920) was an earlier agreement that initially defined the Syria-Turkey border, which the Treaty of Ankara (1921) subsequently revised, granting Turkey more favorable territorial terms.
What was the primary role of the Armistice of Mudanya in the context of the Treaty of Ankara (1921)?
Answer: It was a ceasefire agreement that confirmed the annulment of French claims over Turkish land.
The Armistice of Mudanya was a ceasefire agreement that officially confirmed the annulment of French claims over Turkish land, building upon the territorial adjustments made by the Treaty of Ankara (1921).
Which of the following treaties was NOT concluded during the Turkish War of Independence, in addition to the Treaty of Ankara (1921)?
Answer: The Treaty of Versailles
The Treaty of Versailles was signed in 1919, concluding World War I, and was not among the treaties specifically concluded during the Turkish War of Independence, which included Alexandropol, Kars, and Lausanne.