Canada's Electoral Tsunami: The 1958 Landslide
An analytical exploration of the historic federal election that dramatically reshaped Canadian politics.
Election Overview 📊 View Results 🗳️Dive in with Flashcard Learning!
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮
Election Overview
A Historic Mandate
The 1958 Canadian federal election, held on March 31, 1958, resulted in a monumental victory for Prime Minister John Diefenbaker and the Progressive Conservative Party. This election transformed a minority government into the largest majority in Canadian history at the time, securing 208 seats and 78.5% of the seats in the House of Commons. This outcome remains unparalleled in its percentage of seats and the size of the majority over all opposition parties.
Record Turnout
Voter participation reached an unprecedented 79.4% of eligible electors, marking the highest turnout in Canadian federal election history. This surge in engagement underscored the significant public interest and the pivotal nature of the political landscape at the time.
Key Factors
Diefenbaker's decisive victory was fueled by several critical factors:
- Liberal Leadership Transition: The Liberal Party had recently elected Lester Pearson as its new leader, but an early misstep asking Diefenbaker to resign without an election created a political vulnerability.
- Quebec's Political Shift: Historically a Liberal stronghold, Quebec saw a significant realignment. Voters, seeking greater representation in Ottawa, were swayed by the Progressive Conservative alliance, leading to a substantial PC gain in the province.
- Social Credit Decline: The federal Social Credit Party, once seen as a potential major force, experienced a dramatic collapse, losing all its seats and contributing to the Progressive Conservative's dominance, particularly in Western Canada.
National Results Summary
Vote Distribution
The Progressive Conservative Party secured a commanding majority of the popular vote, demonstrating widespread support across the nation. The Liberal Party, while maintaining a significant portion, saw its support diminish considerably compared to the previous election.
Party Performance
The election saw a dramatic shift in parliamentary representation. The Progressive Conservatives achieved a dominant position, while the Liberal Party suffered significant losses. The Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) and Social Credit Party also saw their seat counts drastically reduced.
Party | Leader | # of candidates |
1957 | Seats | Popular vote | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Elected | % Change | # | % | pp Change | ||||||
Progressive Conservative | John Diefenbaker | 265 | 111 | 208 | +87.4% | 3,908,633 | 53.66% | +14.85 | ||
Liberal | Lester B. Pearson | 264 | 104 | 48 | -53.8% | 2,432,953 | 33.40% | -7.35 | ||
Co-operative Commonwealth | M.J. Coldwell | 169 | 25 | 8 | -68.0% | 692,668 | 9.51% | -1.20 | ||
Liberal–Labour | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0% | 11,956 | 0.16% | - | |||
Social Credit | Solon Low | 82 | 19 | - | -100% | 188,356 | 2.59% | -3.99 | ||
Independent | 9 | 2 | - | -100% | 14,211 | 0.20% | -0.87 | |||
Independent Liberal | 10 | 2 | - | -100% | 12,054 | 0.17% | -1.25 | |||
Labor–Progressive | Tim Buck | 18 | - | - | - | 9,769 | 0.13% | +0.02 | ||
Candidats des électeurs | Réal Caouette | 1 | - | - | - | 8,276 | 0.11% | -0.01 | ||
Independent Conservative | 5 | 1 | - | -100% | 2,097 | 0.03% | -0.19 | |||
Socialist | 2 | * | - | * | 1,113 | 0.02% | * | |||
Capital familial | H-G Grenier | 1 | * | - | * | 968 | 0.01% | * | ||
Radical chrétien | 1 | * | - | * | 687 | 0.01% | * | |||
Independent SC | 1 | - | - | - | 361 | x | -0.04 | |||
Ouvrier canadien | 1 | * | - | * | 243 | x | * | |||
Total | 831 | 265 | 265 | - | 7,284,467 | 100.00% | ||||
Sources: Elections Canada, History of Federal Ridings since 1867 (Archived) |
Opinion Polling Trends
National Trends
Pre-election polling indicated a strong lead for the Progressive Conservatives, reflecting the political momentum gained by Diefenbaker's government. The data shows a consistent upward trend for the PCs and a decline for the Liberals leading up to the election day.
Polling firm | Last day of survey | Source | PC | LPC | CCF | SC | Other | Undecided | ME | Sample |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Election 1958 | March 31, 1958 | 53.67 | 33.75 | 9.50 | 2.59 | 0.49 | 7,284,467 | |||
Gallup | March 1958 | [2] | 56 | 32 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 13 | — | — |
Gallup | January 1958 | [3] | 50 | 35 | 9 | 6 | — | — | — | |
Gallup | November 1957 | [3] | 50 | 33 | 9 | 7 | 1 | — | — | — |
Gallup | October 1957 | [3] | 48 | 34 | 10 | 7 | 1 | — | — | — |
Gallup | July 1957 | [4] | 47 | 35 | 10 | 8 | — | — | — | — |
Election 1957 | June 10, 1957 | 38.50 | 40.45 | 10.59 | 6.54 | 3.92 |
Regional Dynamics
Polling data also highlighted significant regional variations. Quebec showed a shift towards the PCs, while Ontario demonstrated strong Conservative support. Western Canada also saw a notable increase in Progressive Conservative favourability.
Polling firm | Last day of survey | Source | PC | LPC | CCF | Other | ME | Sample |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Election 1958 | March 31, 1958 | 49.6 | 45.6 | 2.3 | 2.5 | — | — | |
Gallup | March 1958 | [5] | 49 | 45 | — | — | — | — |
Gallup | January 1958 | [3] | 42 | 51 | 3 | 4 | — | — |
Gallup | November 1957 | [3] | 43 | 50 | 1 | 6 | — | — |
Gallup | July 1957 | [4] | 40 | 54 | — | — | — | — |
Election 1957 | June 10, 1957 | 30.7 | 56.8 | 1.8 | 10.7 | — | — |
Historical Context
Post-War Landscape
The election occurred during a period of significant post-war development and evolving political alignments in Canada. The Progressive Conservatives, led by John Diefenbaker, had formed a minority government in the previous election of 1957, ending decades of Liberal dominance. The 1958 election was called as a snap election, allowing Diefenbaker to capitalize on his government's popularity and the perceived weaknesses of the opposition.
Key Political Shifts
The election marked a profound shift in Canadian political geography. The Progressive Conservatives achieved unprecedented success, particularly in Quebec, a province that had long favoured the Liberal Party. This electoral realignment demonstrated the effectiveness of Diefenbaker's appeal and the strategic positioning of his party.
Major Political Parties
Progressive Conservatives
Led by Prime Minister John Diefenbaker, the Progressive Conservatives presented themselves as a party of national unity and progress. Their campaign successfully leveraged public confidence and capitalized on the perceived instability within the Liberal Party, resulting in a landslide victory.
Liberal Party
Under the new leadership of Lester B. Pearson, the Liberal Party faced a challenging election. Despite Pearson's international reputation, the party struggled to counter the Conservative momentum and suffered substantial seat losses, marking a low point in their electoral history.
CCF and Social Credit
The Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) and the Social Credit Party experienced significant declines in support. The CCF saw its seat count reduced, while the Social Credit Party was virtually eliminated from Parliament, highlighting the two-party dominance that emerged from this election.
Provincial Results Breakdown
The Progressive Conservative landslide was evident across most provinces, with notable gains in traditional Liberal strongholds. The following table details the seat distribution and popular vote percentages by province and territory.
Party name | BC | AB | SK | MB | ON | QC | NB | NS | PE | NL | YK | NW | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Progressive Conservative | Seats: | 18 | 17 | 16 | 14 | 67 | 50 | 7 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 1 | - | 208 | |
Vote (%): | 49.4 | 59.9 | 51.4 | 56.7 | 56.4 | 49.6 | 54.1 | 57.0 | 62.2 | 45.2 | 54.5 | 42.8 | 53.7 | ||
Liberal | Seats: | - | - | - | - | 14 | 25 | 3 | - | - | 5 | - | 1 | 48 | |
Vote (%): | 16.1 | 13.7 | 19.6 | 21.6 | 32.1 | 45.6 | 43.4 | 38.4 | 37.5 | 54.4 | 43.3 | 57.2 | 33.4 | ||
Co-operative Commonwealth | Seats: | 4 | - | 1 | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | |||
Vote (%): | 24.5 | 4.4 | 28.4 | 19.6 | 10.5 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 4.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 9.5 | ||||
Liberal–Labour | Seats: | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Vote (%): | 0.5 | 0.2 | |||||||||||||
Social Credit | Seats: | ||||||||||||||
Vote (%): | 9.6 | 21.6 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 2.6 | ||||||||
Independent | Vote (%): | xx | xx | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.2 | |||||||||
Independent Liberal | Vote (%): | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||||||||||
Labor–Progressive | Vote (%): | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||||
C. des électeurs | Vote (%): | 0.4 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Independent PC | Vote (%): | 0.1 | 0.1 | xx | |||||||||||
Socialist | Vote (%): | xx | xx | xx | |||||||||||
Capital familial | Vote (%): | xx | xx | ||||||||||||
Radical chrétien | Vote (%): | xx | xx | ||||||||||||
Independent SC | Vote (%): | 0.1 | xx |
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "1958 Canadian Federal Election" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.
This is not political or historical advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional historical research or political analysis. Always refer to official sources and consult with qualified experts for specific needs. Never disregard professional advice because of something you have read on this website.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.