The 1993 New Jersey Senate: A Shifting Landscape
Analyzing the pivotal 1993 elections that reshaped the New Jersey State Senate, set against the backdrop of gubernatorial change.
Election Overview 👇 View Results 📊Dive in with Flashcard Learning!
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮
Election Overview
Election Date
The election for all 40 seats in the New Jersey State Senate was held on November 2, 1993. This election occurred concurrently with the gubernatorial race.
Purpose
The election determined the composition of the New Jersey State Senate for the subsequent legislative term. Control of the Senate required securing at least 21 seats.
Majority Context
Republicans aimed to defend the substantial majority they had captured in the 1991 elections. The outcome would indicate the continued political momentum following the previous election cycle.
Political Context
Gubernatorial Race
This Senate election was closely tied to the outcome of the gubernatorial race, where Republican Christine Todd Whitman successfully unseated the incumbent Democratic Governor Jim Florio.
Party Dynamics
While Republicans maintained their overall majority, Democrats managed to regain seats in Districts 7 and 19, which they had lost in the 1991 landslide. An additional pickup occurred in District 25, representing a slight shift in the balance.
Emerging Figures
The election cycle marked the early political careers of notable figures. Future Governor Jim McGreevey secured a Democratic gain in District 19. Simultaneously, Chris Christie, who would later become Governor, unsuccessfully challenged incumbent Senator John H. Dorsey in the Republican primary for District 25.
Incumbents Not Seeking Re-election
Democratic Incumbents
Matthew Feldman, representing District 37, did not seek re-election. His departure created an opening for new representation in his district.
Republican Incumbents
John E. Dimon from District 30 also opted not to run for re-election, leaving his seat open for contestation.
Election Results Summary
Overall Outcome
The Republican Party successfully defended its majority, securing 24 seats. The Democratic Party held 16 seats. Compared to the previous election, Republicans lost 3 seats while Democrats gained 3, resulting in a net change of zero seats for both parties in terms of overall control but indicating shifts within specific districts.
Close Races
Several districts experienced competitive contests, decided by margins of less than 10%:
- District 4: Republican hold, 8.6% margin.
- District 7: Democratic gain, 2.2% margin.
- District 15: Republican hold, 4.6% margin.
- District 19: Democratic gain, 2.5% margin.
- District 25: Democratic gain, 0.6% margin (closest race).
- District 34: Republican hold, 4.6% margin.
- District 36: Republican hold, 5.8% margin.
Party Leaders
Donald DiFrancesco continued as Senate President, representing the Republican majority. John A. Lynch Jr. served as the leader for the Democratic minority.
District-Level Analysis
Detailed results for each district highlight the specific contests and outcomes. Below is a summary of key districts and notable races.
District 7: Democratic Gain
This district saw a significant shift as Democrat Jack Casey unseated incumbent Republican Bradford S. Smith by a narrow margin of 2.2%. This represented a key pickup for the Democrats.
District 19: Democratic Gain
Democrat James E. McGreevey captured this seat from incumbent Republican Randy Corman with a 2.5% margin, contributing to the Democratic gains.
District 25: Closest Race & Upset
This district featured the closest contest, with Democrat Gordon MacInnes narrowly defeating incumbent Republican John H. Dorsey by just 0.6%. The primary challenge by Chris Christie may have impacted Dorsey's re-election bid.
Election Analysis
Impact of Governor's Race
The outcome of the Senate elections mirrored the statewide trend seen in the gubernatorial race, where Whitman's victory signaled a potential Republican advantage or a desire for change among the electorate. The Senate results largely confirmed this trend, with Republicans holding their majority despite minor Democratic gains.
Seat Flips and Margins
The Democratic gains in Districts 7, 19, and 25, particularly the narrow victory in District 25, underscore the competitive nature of these contests. These shifts, while not altering the overall majority, indicate areas where Democratic support was strengthening or Republican support was waning.
Future Leaders
The election serves as a notable point in the careers of figures like Jim McGreevey and Chris Christie, demonstrating their early engagement in state politics and foreshadowing their later gubernatorial candidacies. The dynamics within District 25, including the primary challenge, highlight the internal party politics at play.
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "1993 New Jersey Senate Election" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
- Kenny was appointed to complete the unexpired term of Senator Bob Menendez, who resigned to take his seat in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.
This is not political advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional political analysis, consultation, or advice. Always refer to official election records and consult with qualified political scientists or historians for in-depth understanding.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.