What is the definition of annexation in the context of international law?

In international law, annexation is defined as the forcible acquisition and assertion of legal title over territory belonging to one state by another state. This typically occurs after the territory has been militarily occupied.

Is annexation generally considered legal under current international law?

No, under current international law, annexation is generally considered an illegal act. It is viewed as a unilateral action where one state seizes and holds territory, distinct from a complete conquest or a cession through a treaty.

How can an annexation be legitimized according to international norms?

An annexation can be legitimized if it receives general recognition from other states and international bodies. This recognition is crucial for its legal standing.

Why do states often avoid using the term 'annexation' to describe their territorial acquisitions?

States that engage in territorial acquisitions through means that are illegal under international law often avoid using the term 'annexation' to describe their actions. This is because the illegality of annexation means they typically seek to characterize their actions differently to avoid international condemnation or legal challenges.

What key international agreements have shaped the evolution of international law regarding the use of force and territorial integrity?

The international legal framework concerning the use of force and territorial integrity evolved significantly in the 20th century. Key agreements include the 1907 Porter Convention, the 1920 Covenant of the League of Nations, the 1928 Kellogg-Briand Pact, and crucially, Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter, which prohibits the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.

How does the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court address annexation by force?

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court classifies 'annexation by the use of force of the territory of another State or part thereof' as an act of aggression. This aligns with the broader international legal principle prohibiting the acquisition of territory through force.

What is the relationship between military occupation and annexation under international law?

Annexation typically follows military occupation. However, while occupation involves the temporary control of territory, annexation implies the assertion of permanent legal title and sovereignty over that territory. Illegally annexed territory is still considered occupied under international law, and humanitarian law provisions continue to apply.

What is the difference between de jure and de facto annexation?

De jure annexation refers to a formal declaration by a state claiming permanent sovereignty over territory, essentially a legal act. De facto annexation, on the other hand, is a descriptive term for a state establishing facts on the ground, such as exercising governmental functions, as a prelude to a future claim of sovereignty, often without a formal declaration.

How did the Fourth Geneva Convention (GCIV) impact the practice of annexation?

The Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 amplified the rules set forth in the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, particularly concerning the protection of civilians. Its provisions, which grant absolute character to the inviolability of rights, make it more difficult for states to bypass international law through annexation.

What actions did Israel take regarding East Jerusalem after the Six-Day War in 1967?

After capturing East Jerusalem from Jordan during the Six-Day War in 1967, Israel unilaterally extended its law and jurisdiction to the area, incorporating approximately 70 square kilometers into the Jerusalem Municipality. While initially described as administrative and municipal integration, Israel later passed the Jerusalem Law in 1980, declaring Jerusalem the 'complete and united' capital of Israel, which is widely interpreted as a de facto annexation.

What was the international community's response to Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem?

The international community, through various United Nations Security Council resolutions (including 252, 267, 271, 298, 465, 476, and 478), declared Israel's annexation of East Jerusalem null and void. Only Costa Rica initially recognized Israel's annexation, and other nations did not move their embassies to Jerusalem.

What is the status of the Golan Heights under international law concerning Israeli actions?

Israel occupied the Golan Heights from Syria in 1967 and passed the Golan Heights Law in 1981 to extend its law, jurisdiction, and administration to the area. The United Nations Security Council Resolution 497 declared this action null and void and without international legal effect. The UN General Assembly has also reaffirmed the illegality of Israeli settlement construction in the occupied Syrian Golan and called for a full Israeli withdrawal.

How did Morocco annex Western Sahara, and what was the process?

Morocco annexed Western Sahara in two stages: 1976 and 1979. Following the Madrid Accords in 1975, Spain ceded administration to Mauritania and Morocco, who partitioned the territory. After a conflict with the Polisario Front, Mauritania renounced its claims in 1979, allowing Morocco to extend its annexation to the previously Mauritanian-controlled areas.

What is the international stance on Russia's annexation of Crimea in 2014?

The United Nations General Assembly considers Russia's possession of Crimea and Sevastopol an 'attempted annexation' and the Russian Federation an 'occupying power'. Russia rejects this characterization, referring to the event as 're-unification' based on historical ties and a disputed referendum.

When did Russia declare the annexation of territories in southern and eastern Ukraine?

On September 30, 2022, following referendums conducted during the invasion of Ukraine, the Russian Federation declared the annexation of territories in southern and eastern Ukraine, claiming sovereignty over parts of Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, and Mykolaiv oblasts.

How did Ethiopia annex Eritrea in the mid-20th century?

In 1952, Ethiopian Emperor Haile Selassie orchestrated a federation with Eritrea. He dissolved this federation in 1962 and annexed Eritrea, which subsequently led to the Eritrean War of Independence.

What happened to Mauritania's claim over parts of Western Sahara?

In 1979, Mauritania abandoned its territorial claims to the southern third of Western Sahara, effectively disestablishing the province of Western Tiris that it had previously annexed.

What was the context and recognition of Jordan's annexation of the West Bank?

After the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, Jordan annexed the territory it occupied, renaming it the 'West Bank'. This annexation occurred in 1950 at the request of a Palestinian delegation, though the representativeness of this delegation was questioned. Only Pakistan and the United Kingdom recognized Jordan's annexation. Jordan officially relinquished its claim in 1988.

How did South Africa incorporate South West Africa?

From 1961 to 1990, the Union of South Africa gradually incorporated the territory of South West Africa (modern-day Namibia) as its fifth province. This involved extending citizenship and voting rights, initially to the white minority and later partially to the mixed-race population.

What was the outcome of Indonesia's annexation of East Timor?

Following an Indonesian invasion in 1975, East Timor was annexed by Indonesia and administered as the province of Timor Timur. This annexation was never recognized by the United Nations. After a 1999 referendum, East Timor achieved independence in 2002.

What were Saddam Hussein's justifications for the annexation of Kuwait in 1990?

Saddam Hussein's primary justifications for annexing Kuwait in August 1990 included the claim that Kuwait was historically an Iraqi province and that the annexation was retaliation for Kuwait's alleged 'economic warfare' through slant drilling into Iraqi oil supplies.

How was the Iraqi annexation of Kuwait resolved?

The Iraqi annexation of Kuwait was resolved through the Gulf War, initiated by a US-led coalition authorized by UN Security Council resolutions. The coalition forces successfully drove out Iraqi forces, reinstating the Kuwaiti Emir and ensuring Kuwait's continued independence.

What is the basis for China's claim over Tibet, and how is it viewed internationally?

China's claim over Tibet is based on the Qing dynasty's historical rule and the 1912 Imperial Edict of the Abdication, which the Republic of China used to assert inheritance of Qing territories. Although the People's Republic of China gained control after a 1950 military conflict and the 1951 Seventeen Point Agreement, many analysts consider the incorporation of Tibet into the PRC an annexation. While Tibet is internationally recognized as part of China, claims persist that the 1951 agreement was signed under duress.

How did India annex Hyderabad State after British rule ended?

After the withdrawal of the British Empire, Hyderabad State chose to resume its status as an independent state rather than join India or Pakistan. India launched 'Operation Polo' in September 1948, invading Hyderabad. Following a swift military campaign, the Nizam signed a treaty that resulted in Hyderabad's annexation by India.

What was the military conflict over Goa, Daman, and Diu in 1961?

In 1961, India launched a military invasion of Portuguese-controlled Goa and Daman and Diu, ending 451 years of Portuguese colonial rule. This action was viewed in India as a liberation of Indian territory, while Portugal considered it a national tragedy. The UN Security Council's condemnation was vetoed by the Soviet Union.

What was the process by which Sikkim became a state of India?

Sikkim was brought under Indian suzerainty by a treaty in 1950. Following popular movements demanding greater representation and a request for protection from India in 1973, the Indian Army moved into Sikkim in 1975. A referendum resulted in overwhelming support for joining India, and Sikkim officially became India's 22nd state on May 16, 1975.

How did Western New Guinea become part of Indonesia?

Western New Guinea officially became part of Indonesia in 1969 through the 'Act of Free Choice,' supervised by the UN. This process, based on the 1962 New York Agreement, involved a deliberation of representatives who voted to join Indonesia, a result accepted by the UN General Assembly.

What led to the de facto annexation of South Vietnam by North Vietnam?

North Vietnam achieved de facto annexation of South Vietnam following its military defeat and the effective dissolution of the South Vietnamese government and military on April 30, 1975. Vietnam was officially reunited as a single country one year later.

What is the significance of the 'Act of Free Choice' in relation to Western New Guinea?

The 'Act of Free Choice' in 1969 was a UN-supervised process intended to determine whether Western New Guinea would join Indonesia. The majority vote in favor of joining Indonesia was accepted by the UN General Assembly, implicitly recognizing Western New Guinea as part of Indonesia.

What territorial claim did Norway make in 2015?

In 2015, the Kingdom of Norway formally claimed to have annexed an unclaimed area of Antarctica between the existing borders of Queen Maud Land (established in 1939) and the South Pole.

How did Britain claim Rockall in 1955?

On September 18, 1955, a British team deposited on Rockall cemented a plaque and hoisted the Union Flag to stake the UK's claim. This action officially declared the annexation of Rockall by the British Crown.

What is 'creeping annexation' as discussed in relation to Israeli policy?

'Creeping annexation,' also referred to as de facto annexation, is a term used in discussions about Israeli policy in the occupied Palestinian territories. It describes a pattern of behavior, such as settlement expansion and resource control, that suggests an intention to hold territory under Israeli dominion without a formal declaration of annexation.

What is the difference between conquest and annexation?

Conquest refers to the act of defeating an enemy in war and taking control of their territory. Annexation, while often following conquest, is the specific unilateral act by which a state asserts legal title and sovereignty over that territory. Conquest alone does not automatically transfer sovereignty; an assertion of title is required for annexation.

What is the Stimson Doctrine, and how does it relate to annexation?

The Stimson Doctrine, originating from the US in 1932, states that a nation cannot admit the legality of any situation created by force or recognize any treaty or agreement resulting from actions contrary to international pacts, such as the Kellogg-Briand Pact. This doctrine implies that territorial changes effected by means of annexation should not be recognized as lawful.

How does Article 47 of the Fourth Geneva Convention address annexation?

Article 47 of the Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits the deprivation of protected persons' rights in occupied territory due to any change resulting from the occupation, including any agreement between authorities or annexation by the occupying power. This means that even if a territory is annexed, the rights guaranteed by the convention must still be upheld.

What was the status of Sikkim prior to its integration into India?

Prior to its integration into India in 1975, Sikkim had an ambiguous status, sometimes considered a princely state and sometimes a protectorate of India. Between 1947 and 1950, it enjoyed de facto independence, but a treaty in 1950 placed it under Indian suzerainty, with India controlling its external affairs, defense, and communications.

What role did the UN play in the Indonesian annexation of Western New Guinea?

The UN played a supervisory role in the 'Act of Free Choice' in 1969, which determined Western New Guinea's integration into Indonesia. The UN General Assembly accepted the report on the implementation of this act, implicitly recognizing Western New Guinea as part of Indonesia.

What is the significance of the Jerusalem Law passed by Israel in 1980?

The Jerusalem Law, passed in 1980 as part of Israel's Basic Laws, declared Jerusalem to be the 'complete and united' capital of Israel. This act is widely interpreted as Israel's purported annexation of East Jerusalem, a move that has been declared null and void by numerous UN Security Council resolutions.

What is the general international legal perspective on territorial changes resulting from the use of force?

The general international legal perspective, particularly since the mid-20th century, is that territorial changes resulting from the threat or use of force are illegal. This principle is enshrined in the UN Charter and reinforced by subsequent declarations and treaties, making annexation through force a violation of international law.

What is the distinction between annexation and cession in international law?

Annexation is a unilateral act where a state asserts legal title over territory, often following military occupation. Cession, conversely, involves the transfer of territory from one state to another through a formal agreement, such as a treaty, where the territory is given or sold.

What was the outcome of the 1999 referendum in East Timor regarding Indonesian rule?

In 1999, a referendum was held in East Timor under a UN-sponsored agreement. The people of East Timor voted to reject autonomy within Indonesia, leading to East Timor achieving independence in 2002.

How did the 1975 Spring Offensive contribute to the annexation of South Vietnam?

The 1975 Spring Offensive by North Vietnam resulted in the military defeat and effective dissolution of the government and military of South Vietnam. This paved the way for North Vietnam to achieve de facto annexation of South Vietnam.

What is the significance of the UN General Assembly's stance on the Russian annexation of Crimea?

The UN General Assembly considers the Russian possession of Crimea and Sevastopol to be an 'attempted annexation' and views the Russian Federation as an 'occupying power'. This reflects the international community's general non-recognition of the annexation.

What historical basis does Russia cite for its claim to Crimea?

Russia cites historical ties to Crimea, noting that it was part of the Russian Empire from 1783 to 1917 and part of the Russian SFSR from 1921 to 1954, as a basis for its claim and its characterization of the 2014 events as 're-unification'.

What was the role of the Madrid Accords in the annexation of Western Sahara?

The Madrid Accords, signed in 1975 between Spain, Mauritania, and Morocco, led to the withdrawal of Spanish troops from Western Sahara and the cession of its administration to Mauritania and Morocco, setting the stage for their subsequent annexation of the territory.

What international body declared the Golan Heights Law of 1981 null and void?

The United Nations Security Council, through Resolution 497, declared Israel's Golan Heights Law of 1981, which extended Israeli law, jurisdiction, and administration to the area, to be 'null and void and without international legal effect'.

What is the 'creeping annexation' argument concerning the West Bank?

The 'creeping annexation' argument suggests that Israel's pattern of behavior in the West Bank, including settlement expansion and control over resources, constitutes a violation of the international prohibition against annexation, even in the absence of a formal declaration.

What was the outcome of the 1975 referendum in Sikkim regarding its political status?

In April 1975, a referendum was held in Sikkim where 97.5% of the voting population supported joining the Indian Union. This led to Sikkim officially becoming the 22nd state of India on May 16, 1975, and the abolition of its monarchy.

What is the international legal perspective on the annexation of territory by force?

The international legal perspective is that annexation of territory by force is illegal and constitutes an act of aggression. This principle is upheld by key international agreements and declarations, including the UN Charter and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

What action did the United States take in 2019 regarding the Golan Heights?

On March 25, 2019, the United States formally recognized the Golan Heights as sovereign Israeli territory, a move that was met with condemnation from the UN Secretary-General and other international bodies, who reiterated that the status of the Golan Heights had not changed under international law.

Annexation Wiki: The Legal Landscape of Annexation: Principles and Precedents

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Defining Annexation

Core Concept

In the realm of international law, annexation refers to the forcible acquisition and assertion of legal title over a territory belonging to one state by another state. This act typically follows a period of military occupation.

Distinction from Other Acts

Annexation is distinct from cession, where territory is transferred via treaty, and from complete conquest, which implies the subjugation of an entire state. Annexation is a unilateral assertion of sovereignty over specific territory.

Legitimacy and Recognition

The legitimacy of an annexation is contingent upon its general recognition by other states and international bodies. Without such recognition, the act remains legally contentious and often invalid under contemporary international norms.

Illegality in Modern Law

Prohibition of Force

The international legal framework has evolved significantly, particularly in the 20th century, to prohibit the use of force in international relations. Key instruments like the UN Charter (Article 2(4)) and the Kellogg-Briand Pact underscore the principle that territorial acquisition through force is unlawful.

Aggression and Annexation

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court explicitly defines annexation achieved through force as an act of aggression. This legal stance reflects a global consensus against territorial expansion via military means.

Non-Recognition Principle

A cornerstone of contemporary international law is the principle of non-recognition of unlawful territorial changes. States are obligated not to recognize situations brought about by means contrary to international law, such as annexation.

Evolution of Legal Norms

Historical Context

Historically, annexation was a recognized method of territorial acquisition. However, post-World War I and II, international law shifted decisively against it, emphasizing state sovereignty and territorial integrity.

1907 Porter Convention: Addressed rules of war, implicitly limiting territorial gains.
1920 Covenant of the League of Nations: Promoted peaceful dispute resolution.
1928 Kellogg-Briand Pact: Renounced war as an instrument of national policy.
1945 UN Charter (Article 2(4)): Explicitly prohibits the threat or use of force against territorial integrity or political independence.
1970 Friendly Relations Declaration: Reaffirmed the prohibition on acquiring territory by force.

The Stimson Doctrine

The Stimson Doctrine, articulated in 1932, established the principle that states should not recognize territorial changes brought about by force, a precursor to broader international prohibitions.

Occupation vs. Annexation

Legal Status

Territory that is illegally annexed is considered to remain under occupation under international law. Consequently, the provisions of international humanitarian law, such as those found in the Fourth Geneva Convention, continue to apply.

De Facto vs. De Jure

International legal scholars distinguish between de jure annexation (a formal declaration of sovereignty) and de facto annexation (the establishment of facts on the ground that prelude a future claim of sovereignty, often termed "creeping annexation"). Both are subject to international legal scrutiny.

Contemporary Examples

Israeli Annexations

Israel's actions concerning East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights have been characterized as annexations by many international bodies and states. These actions, including the Jerusalem Law (1980) and the Golan Heights Law (1981), have been declared null and void by numerous UN Security Council resolutions.

East Jerusalem: Captured in 1967, unilaterally extended Israeli law and jurisdiction in 1967, formalized by the Jerusalem Law in 1980. Declared null and void by UNSC resolutions (e.g., 478).
Golan Heights: Occupied from Syria in 1967, annexed via the Golan Heights Law in 1981. Declared null and void by UNSC Resolution 497.

Russian Annexations

Russia's actions in Crimea (2014) and subsequently in parts of eastern and southern Ukraine (2022) are widely considered annexations under international law. These acts followed disputed referendums and military occupations.

Crimea (2014): Following military occupation and a disputed referendum, Russia incorporated Crimea and Sevastopol, actions deemed an "attempted annexation" by the UN General Assembly.
Ukrainian Oblasts (2022): Following referendums during the invasion, Russia declared the annexation of Donetsk, Kherson, Luhansk, and Zaporizhzhia oblasts. These claims are not recognized by the international community.

Moroccan Annexation of Western Sahara

Morocco annexed Western Sahara in stages (1976, 1979) following the withdrawal of Spain. This action is contested by the Polisario Front and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, and its legality remains a subject of international dispute.

Indonesian Annexation of East Timor

Indonesia annexed East Timor in 1976 following its invasion in 1975. This annexation was never recognized by the United Nations. East Timor achieved independence in 2002.

Key Concepts

Uti Possidetis

This principle, often applied post-colonialism, generally supports the maintenance of existing administrative boundaries as international frontiers. While not directly about annexation, it relates to the stability of territorial claims.

Cession vs. Annexation

Cession involves the voluntary transfer of territory through a treaty, whereas annexation is a unilateral act of seizing territory, typically following military occupation, and asserting legal title.

Conquest and Occupation

While conquest can lead to annexation, international law now prohibits territorial acquisition through conquest. Territory occupied during conflict remains subject to specific international humanitarian laws, and annexation attempts are generally deemed illegal.

Further Study

External Resources

For deeper academic engagement, consult specialized legal encyclopedias and scholarly works on international law and territorial disputes.

Wiktionary: Annexation
The Development of Territorial Norms and the Norm against Conquest
The Evolution of Territorial Conquest After 1945

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "Annexation" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about annexation while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

monticello florida

racine wisconsin

religion in bhutan

muhammad haji ibrahim egal

taeniamia fucata

archdiocese of avignon

camunni

philip h. hayes

governor of northern ireland

nepal

References

Sela, Avraham. "Jerusalem." The Continuum Political Encyclopedia of the Middle East. Ed. Avraham Sela. New York: Continuum, 2002. pp. 391â498.

Frank, Mitch. Understanding the Holy Land: Answering Questions about the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. New York: Viking, 2005. p. 74.

A full list of references for this article are available at the Annexation Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Academic Disclaimer

Important Notice

This document has been generated by an Artificial Intelligence, drawing upon publicly available academic and legal sources. It is intended for educational and informational purposes at a postgraduate level, providing an overview of complex international legal concepts.

This is not legal advice. The content presented here is not a substitute for professional legal consultation, analysis, or representation. International law is nuanced and context-dependent. Readers are strongly advised to consult with qualified legal professionals or academic experts for specific guidance on matters related to territorial disputes, international law, or geopolitical analysis.

The creators of this content are not responsible for any inaccuracies, omissions, or interpretations of the information provided, nor for any actions taken based upon it. Always verify information with primary sources and expert consultation.

The Legal Landscape of Annexation

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

Defining Annexation ⚖️

📜 Core Concept

➡️ Distinction from Other Acts

🏛️ Legitimacy and Recognition

Illegality in Modern Law 🚫

📜 Prohibition of Force

⚖️ Aggression and Annexation

🌍 Non-Recognition Principle

Evolution of Legal Norms ⏳

📜 Historical Context

⚖️ The Stimson Doctrine

Occupation vs. Annexation ⚔️

🏛️ Legal Status

📜 De Facto vs. De Jure

Contemporary Examples 🌍

🇮🇱 Israeli Annexations

🇷🇺 Russian Annexations

🇲🇦 Moroccan Annexation of Western Sahara

🇮🇩 Indonesian Annexation of East Timor

Key Concepts 💡

⚖️ Uti Possidetis

🤝 Cession vs. Annexation

🛡️ Conquest and Occupation

Further Study 📚

📖 Related Topics

📖 External Resources

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Academic Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

Defining Annexation

Core Concept

Distinction from Other Acts

Legitimacy and Recognition

Illegality in Modern Law

Prohibition of Force

Aggression and Annexation

Non-Recognition Principle

Evolution of Legal Norms

Historical Context

The Stimson Doctrine

Occupation vs. Annexation

Legal Status

De Facto vs. De Jure

Contemporary Examples

Israeli Annexations

Russian Annexations

Moroccan Annexation of Western Sahara

Indonesian Annexation of East Timor

Key Concepts

Uti Possidetis

Cession vs. Annexation

Conquest and Occupation

Further Study

Related Topics

External Resources

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Academic Disclaimer

Important Notice