#FeesMustFall
A comprehensive chronicle of the student-led movement advocating for accessible and affordable higher education in South Africa.
Understand the Context ๐ Explore the Events ๐Dive in with Flashcard Learning!
๐ฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ฎ
Background
The Catalyst: Fee Increases
The #FeesMustFall movement emerged in response to proposed tuition fee increases by South African universities. Specifically, the University of the Witwatersrand announced a 10.5% fee hike for the upcoming academic year, significantly exceeding the prevailing inflation rate. This announcement ignited widespread student discontent, leading to protests that began on October 14, 2015.
University Rationale
University management cited several factors contributing to the necessity of fee increases. These included the depreciation of the South African Rand against major currencies (increasing costs for imported resources like library materials and equipment), mandated salary increases for academic staff (around 7%), general inflation impacting operational expenses, and significantly higher increases in utility costs.
Broader Context and Grievances
Beyond the immediate issue of fee increases, the protests tapped into deeper systemic issues within South Africa's higher education landscape. These included concerns about inadequate government funding for universities, insufficient financial support for financially disadvantaged students, perceived excessive remuneration for university management, a lack of comprehensive social transformation within institutions, and persistent socio-economic and racial inequalities inherited from the apartheid era.
Movement Timeline
October 2015: Escalation
Protests rapidly spread from the University of Witwatersrand to other major institutions like the University of Cape Town and Rhodes University. Initial actions included campus lockdowns and sit-ins. By October 19, protests had reached the University of Pretoria and Cape Peninsula University of Technology. University management at UCT sought court interdicts, leading to arrests, which in turn spurred larger demonstrations.
August-October 2016: Revival
The #FeesMustFall movement reignited in August 2016 following the Minister of Higher Education's announcement of potential fee increases capped at 8% for 2017. This led to renewed protests and a revival of the campaign under the hashtag #FeesMustFall2016. The government, facing pressure, instructed the Finance Minister to find funds to prevent any fee increases for 2017, despite warnings about affordability.
Financial Impact
Property Damage
The protests resulted in substantial financial costs due to damage to university infrastructure. The South African Department of Higher Education and Training calculated the damage incurred during the 2015 #FeesMustFall protests to be over R300 million. Later estimates suggested the total cost of damages related to the movement could reach R800 million or even R1 billion, with North West University's Mahikeng campus experiencing particularly severe damage.
Government Funding & Bursaries
In response to the protests, the South African government increased its budget allocation for higher education. Over three years, an additional R17 billion was allocated, with annual increases in government subsidies to universities. This led to the establishment of a national bursary scheme in 2018 for students from low-income backgrounds, initially funded at R12.4 billion, with plans for significant future increases.
Movement Revival
The 2016 Resurgence
The announcement of potential fee increases for 2017 triggered a second wave of protests in August 2016, under the banner #FeesMustFall2016. This phase saw renewed campus shutdowns and demonstrations across the country, reflecting ongoing dissatisfaction with the affordability and accessibility of higher education.
Internal Divisions and External Factors
The 2016 protests reportedly faced challenges, including alleged sabotage by political youth organizations and internal divisions within the movement itself. These factors contributed to a perceived loss of momentum compared to the initial 2015 wave.
State Response
Methods of Dispersal
During protests, law enforcement agencies employed various methods to disperse student demonstrators. These included the use of stun grenades, rubber bullets, tear gas, and water cannons. The deployment of these measures, particularly in sensitive locations like Parliament and university campuses, often led to confrontations and heightened tensions.
Allegations of Brutality and Targeting
Significant allegations emerged regarding police brutality and the targeting of student leaders. Reports detailed instances of excessive force, including multiple rubber bullet injuries sustained by student leaders at close range. There were also claims of students being abducted, interrogated, tortured, and abandoned in remote areas. While police spokespersons denied these allegations and emphasized the need for restraint, these claims fueled considerable debate about state conduct during the protests.
Protester Conduct
Incidents of Violence
The protests were not without incidents attributed to students. Reports documented alleged attacks on security guards, including beatings with blunt objects and hospitalization. Instances of property damage, such as vehicles being set on fire and vandalism of campus facilities (including the burning of a library), were also recorded. The use of fire extinguishers in enclosed spaces led to a reported fatality of a university worker due to an asthma attack.
Intimidation and Suppression
Concerns were raised about intimidation tactics employed against university staff and students who did not participate in the protests. Allegations included threats of violence and the creation of an environment perceived as intolerant of dissenting viewpoints, which critics argued eroded freedom of speech on campuses.
Enduring Impact
Policy Achievements
The #FeesMustFall movement achieved significant policy victories. The immediate impact was the prevention of university fee increases in 2016. More broadly, the protests contributed to the national government's commitment to providing free higher education for students from low-income backgrounds, culminating in the establishment of substantial national bursary schemes.
Critiques and Criticisms
Despite its successes, the movement faced criticism. Some analyses suggested that the focus on decolonization in the 2016 protests was less effective than the economic focus of 2015. Critics also pointed to the erosion of free speech and the promotion of intolerance on university campuses. Furthermore, the significant property damage and the alleged role of protest actions in contributing to the mental distress and eventual suicide of a prominent academic were points of serious concern and debate.
Political Alignment
Several individuals prominent in the #FeesMustFall movement later became involved in political activism, with notable figures registering as representatives for the Economic Freedom Fighters party in the 2019 South African general election. The movement's narrative and impact were also captured in media, including the 2019 documentary film Everything Must Fall.
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "Feesmustfall" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.
This is not professional advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional academic, political, or social analysis. Always refer to official documentation and consult with qualified experts for specific contexts. Never disregard professional advice because of something you have read on this website.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.