This is a visual explainer based on the Wikipedia article on #FeesMustFall. Read the full source article here. (opens in new tab)

#FeesMustFall

A comprehensive chronicle of the student-led movement advocating for accessible and affordable higher education in South Africa.

Understand the Context ๐Ÿ‘‡ Explore the Events ๐Ÿ“…

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
๐ŸŽฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ŸŽฎ

Background

The Catalyst: Fee Increases

The #FeesMustFall movement emerged in response to proposed tuition fee increases by South African universities. Specifically, the University of the Witwatersrand announced a 10.5% fee hike for the upcoming academic year, significantly exceeding the prevailing inflation rate. This announcement ignited widespread student discontent, leading to protests that began on October 14, 2015.

University Rationale

University management cited several factors contributing to the necessity of fee increases. These included the depreciation of the South African Rand against major currencies (increasing costs for imported resources like library materials and equipment), mandated salary increases for academic staff (around 7%), general inflation impacting operational expenses, and significantly higher increases in utility costs.

Broader Context and Grievances

Beyond the immediate issue of fee increases, the protests tapped into deeper systemic issues within South Africa's higher education landscape. These included concerns about inadequate government funding for universities, insufficient financial support for financially disadvantaged students, perceived excessive remuneration for university management, a lack of comprehensive social transformation within institutions, and persistent socio-economic and racial inequalities inherited from the apartheid era.

Movement Timeline

October 2015: Escalation

Protests rapidly spread from the University of Witwatersrand to other major institutions like the University of Cape Town and Rhodes University. Initial actions included campus lockdowns and sit-ins. By October 19, protests had reached the University of Pretoria and Cape Peninsula University of Technology. University management at UCT sought court interdicts, leading to arrests, which in turn spurred larger demonstrations.

  • October 14: Protests begin at Wits University over a 10.5% fee increase.
  • October 17: Wits management agrees to suspend the fee increase and renegotiate.
  • October 19: Protests spread to UCT and Rhodes University; UCT applies for a court interdict.
  • October 20: Protests intensify across multiple universities; students block roads and occupy administration buildings.
  • October 21: Approximately 5,000 students march on the South African Parliament in Cape Town, leading to clashes with police and arrests.
  • October 23: President Jacob Zuma announces a freeze on university fee increases for 2016 following nationwide protests.

August-October 2016: Revival

The #FeesMustFall movement reignited in August 2016 following the Minister of Higher Education's announcement of potential fee increases capped at 8% for 2017. This led to renewed protests and a revival of the campaign under the hashtag #FeesMustFall2016. The government, facing pressure, instructed the Finance Minister to find funds to prevent any fee increases for 2017, despite warnings about affordability.

  • August 2016: The Fees Commission begins hearings; calls for campus shutdowns emerge.
  • September 19: Minister Blade Nzimande announces fee increases capped at 8% for 2017, sparking immediate protests and campus blockades, particularly at Wits University.
  • October 2016: Protests continue, marked by clashes with police, alleged intimidation of students and staff, and significant property damage estimated at R600 million.

Financial Impact

Property Damage

The protests resulted in substantial financial costs due to damage to university infrastructure. The South African Department of Higher Education and Training calculated the damage incurred during the 2015 #FeesMustFall protests to be over R300 million. Later estimates suggested the total cost of damages related to the movement could reach R800 million or even R1 billion, with North West University's Mahikeng campus experiencing particularly severe damage.

Government Funding & Bursaries

In response to the protests, the South African government increased its budget allocation for higher education. Over three years, an additional R17 billion was allocated, with annual increases in government subsidies to universities. This led to the establishment of a national bursary scheme in 2018 for students from low-income backgrounds, initially funded at R12.4 billion, with plans for significant future increases.

Movement Revival

The 2016 Resurgence

The announcement of potential fee increases for 2017 triggered a second wave of protests in August 2016, under the banner #FeesMustFall2016. This phase saw renewed campus shutdowns and demonstrations across the country, reflecting ongoing dissatisfaction with the affordability and accessibility of higher education.

Internal Divisions and External Factors

The 2016 protests reportedly faced challenges, including alleged sabotage by political youth organizations and internal divisions within the movement itself. These factors contributed to a perceived loss of momentum compared to the initial 2015 wave.

State Response

Methods of Dispersal

During protests, law enforcement agencies employed various methods to disperse student demonstrators. These included the use of stun grenades, rubber bullets, tear gas, and water cannons. The deployment of these measures, particularly in sensitive locations like Parliament and university campuses, often led to confrontations and heightened tensions.

Allegations of Brutality and Targeting

Significant allegations emerged regarding police brutality and the targeting of student leaders. Reports detailed instances of excessive force, including multiple rubber bullet injuries sustained by student leaders at close range. There were also claims of students being abducted, interrogated, tortured, and abandoned in remote areas. While police spokespersons denied these allegations and emphasized the need for restraint, these claims fueled considerable debate about state conduct during the protests.

Protester Conduct

Incidents of Violence

The protests were not without incidents attributed to students. Reports documented alleged attacks on security guards, including beatings with blunt objects and hospitalization. Instances of property damage, such as vehicles being set on fire and vandalism of campus facilities (including the burning of a library), were also recorded. The use of fire extinguishers in enclosed spaces led to a reported fatality of a university worker due to an asthma attack.

Intimidation and Suppression

Concerns were raised about intimidation tactics employed against university staff and students who did not participate in the protests. Allegations included threats of violence and the creation of an environment perceived as intolerant of dissenting viewpoints, which critics argued eroded freedom of speech on campuses.

Enduring Impact

Policy Achievements

The #FeesMustFall movement achieved significant policy victories. The immediate impact was the prevention of university fee increases in 2016. More broadly, the protests contributed to the national government's commitment to providing free higher education for students from low-income backgrounds, culminating in the establishment of substantial national bursary schemes.

Critiques and Criticisms

Despite its successes, the movement faced criticism. Some analyses suggested that the focus on decolonization in the 2016 protests was less effective than the economic focus of 2015. Critics also pointed to the erosion of free speech and the promotion of intolerance on university campuses. Furthermore, the significant property damage and the alleged role of protest actions in contributing to the mental distress and eventual suicide of a prominent academic were points of serious concern and debate.

Political Alignment

Several individuals prominent in the #FeesMustFall movement later became involved in political activism, with notable figures registering as representatives for the Economic Freedom Fighters party in the 2019 South African general election. The movement's narrative and impact were also captured in media, including the 2019 documentary film Everything Must Fall.

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "Feesmustfall" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about feesmustfall while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

                                        

References

References

A full list of references for this article are available at the FeesMustFall Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not professional advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional academic, political, or social analysis. Always refer to official documentation and consult with qualified experts for specific contexts. Never disregard professional advice because of something you have read on this website.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.