To whom does the Indian Health Service provide health care services?

The IHS provides health care services to approximately 2.2 million out of 3.7 million American Indians and Alaska Natives across 37 states.

What types of facilities comprised the IHS as of April 2017?

As of April 2017, the IHS consisted of 26 hospitals, 59 health centers, and 32 health stations. Additionally, thirty-three urban Indian health projects supplement these facilities with various health and referral services.

Which federal departments were historically responsible for health services for Native Americans before the IHS was established?

Historically, health services for American Indians and Alaska Natives were first assigned to the Department of War in 1803 and later to the Office of Indian Affairs (now the Bureau of Indian Affairs) in 1824.

What impact did the Meriam Report of 1928 have on health services for Native Americans?

Policy changes resulting from the Meriam Report of 1928 led to increased funding and the establishment of the first preventive medicine program for Native Americans.

When was the Indian Health Service (IHS) officially established, and what significant transfer of authority occurred at that time?

The IHS was established in 1955, following the Indian Health Facilities Act (Transfer Act) of 1954, which transferred departmental authority for health services to the Public Health Service.

What were the four key priorities or functions identified in the IHS's 1957 report to Congress (the "Gold Book")?

The four priorities identified were: assembling a competent health staff, establishing adequate facilities, instituting extensive curative treatment for the seriously ill, and developing a full-scale prevention program to reduce illness and early deaths, particularly from preventable diseases.

What is the IHS's policy regarding hiring qualified Native American applicants?

The IHS is mandated to use Indian Preference in hiring, requiring the agency to give preference to qualified Indian applicants before considering non-Indian candidates, although exceptions exist. This policy aims to ensure employment opportunities for members of the communities served.

What types of professionals are employed by the IHS, and what is the approximate percentage of employees who are American Indian/Alaska Native?

The IHS employs approximately 2,650 nurses, 700 physicians, 700 pharmacists, 100 physician assistants, and 300 dentists, along with other health professionals. In 2007, 71% of IHS employees were American Indian/Alaska Native, reflecting a commitment to employing individuals from the communities they serve.

What is the IHS Extern Program?

The IHS Extern Program hires Native and non-Native American interns, known as "externs." Participants are reimbursed for tuition and fees if the externship fulfills an academic practical experience requirement, providing valuable training opportunities.

What was the first formal legislative authority that allowed health services to be provided to Native Americans?

The Snyder Act of 1921 (25 U.S.C. 13) was the first formal legislative authority enabling the provision of health services to Native Americans, establishing a legal basis for federal involvement in their healthcare.

How did the Indian Self-Determination Act of 1975 (Public Law 93-638) impact tribal administration of health programs?

This act enabled tribal governments to administer programs previously operated by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the IHS. It allows tribes to enter into '638 contracts,' through which they receive IHS funds and manage health services independently, fostering greater tribal control.

What were the key provisions of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act of 1976 (Public Law 94-437)?

This act expanded the IHS budget to enhance health services, enabling the construction and renovation of medical facilities, focusing on safe drinking water and sanitary disposal, and developing programs to increase the number of Native American healthcare professionals and improve urban Native healthcare access.

Who is the current Director of the Indian Health Service, and what is their tribal affiliation?

As of April 8, 2025, the acting director is Benjamin Smith, an enrolled member of the Navajo Nation. Roselyn Tso was previously nominated by President Biden in May 2022 and confirmed in September 2022.

What was the significance of the "Aberdeen Area" report by Senator Byron Dorgan?

A 2010 report by Senator Byron Dorgan found the Aberdeen Area of the IHS to be in a "chronic state of crisis," citing serious management problems and a lack of oversight that adversely affected healthcare access and quality for Native Americans in that region, highlighting systemic issues.

What challenges did Michael D. Weahkee face as acting director of IHS regarding budget discussions with Senator Jon Tester?

In July 2017, Senator Jon Tester chastised Weahkee for refusing to answer direct questions about the adequacy of the 2018 IHS budget proposal to fulfill the Service's mission. Weahkee was later confirmed as director in April 2020, following this scrutiny.

What allegations were made against pediatrician Stanley Patrick Weber, and how did the IHS respond?

In 2009, pediatrician Stanley Patrick Weber was accused of sexually abusing boys over two decades. A 2019 IHS-commissioned report found that IHS officials failed to properly investigate or follow up on these accusations, even promoting him to medical director after they were made, indicating a failure in oversight.

How many regional offices does the IHS operate, and what is their general function?

The IHS operates a network of twelve regional offices that oversee clinical operations for individual facilities and manage funding. These offices help coordinate services across different geographic areas.

What is the general range of health services provided by the IHS?

The IHS provides a variety of health services in outpatient and inpatient settings, including pharmacy, dental, behavioral health, immunizations, pediatrics, physical rehabilitation, and optometry. Patients are advised to confirm specific services with their local facility.

Who is eligible for health benefits from the IHS?

Individuals eligible for IHS health benefits must be of American Indian and/or Alaska Native descent and be part of an Indian community serviced by IHS. Non-Indians may also receive care if they are the child or spouse of an eligible Indian, or a non-Indian woman pregnant with an eligible Indian's child.

What is the difference between "Direct Care" and "Purchased/Referred Care (PRC)" within the IHS system?

"Direct Care" refers to medical and dental services received at an IHS or tribal facility. "Purchased/Referred Care (PRC)" is a program that may cover referrals to non-IHS/tribal facilities, but coverage is not guaranteed due to limited funding, meaning patients may not always receive care outside IHS facilities.

What is the IHS National Core Formulary (NCF), and who regulates it?

The NCF is regulated by the IHS National Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee (NPTC), which comprises administrative leaders and clinical professionals. The formulary reflects current clinical practices and is reviewed quarterly for revisions based on health needs, pharmacoeconomic analyses, and guidelines.

What is the status of new direct-acting anti-retroviral (DAA) hepatitis C medications on the IHS National Core Formulary?

Despite the prevalence of hepatitis C among Native Americans, the IHS currently does not include new DAA hepatitis C medications on its National Core Formulary. These medications are known to provide a cure in most cases but are costly, presenting a challenge for inclusion.

What is the IHS's approach to addressing hepatitis C (HCV) among Native Americans?

In 2012, IHS implemented a nationwide HCV antibody testing program for individuals born between 1945 and 1965, which resulted in a fourfold increase in screened patients. However, the lack of DAA drugs on the formulary hinders effective combatting of the issue, despite higher incidence and death rates among Native Americans.

What types of scholarships does the IHS offer to Native American students pursuing healthcare education?

The IHS offers three types of scholarships: Preparatory Scholarship, Pre-Graduate Scholarship, and Health Professions Scholarship. The Health Professions Scholarship requires a full-time service commitment after professional training, aiming to build the Native healthcare workforce.

What is the purpose of the IHS's Indians Into Medicine (INMED) program?

The INMED program provides grants to universities to support Native American students in their medical education through mentorship, tutoring, financial aid, and other resources, aiming to increase the number of Native American healthcare professionals serving their communities.

What is the significance of the Indian Health Transfer Act of 1954 regarding tribal self-determination?

This act included language recognizing tribal sovereignty and afforded tribes a degree of self-determination in health policy decision-making. It was a foundational step towards greater tribal control over healthcare services.

How does the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA) facilitate tribal control over health services?

The ISDEAA allows tribes to enter into self-determination contracts with federal departments, enabling them to manage IHS activities and services using IHS funds. This process, often referred to as '638 contracts,' allows tribes to administer health services independently.

What is the "Nuka System of Care," and which hospital has adopted it?

The Nuka System of Care is a patient-centered healthcare model developed by the Southcentral Foundation, emphasizing self-determined health service delivery and patient participation. The Cherokee Indian Hospital in North Carolina has adopted this model, focusing on holistic wellness.

What are some of the concerns tribes have raised regarding the IHS's tribal self-determination initiatives?

Some tribes fear that contracting and compacting could lead to "termination by appropriation," where the federal government might reduce funding or deny responsibility if tribes manage programs. They also express concern about the chronic underfunding of IHS programs, making it difficult to manage services effectively.

What barriers can prevent tribes from successfully implementing self-determination initiatives?

Barriers include small tribes lacking administrative capabilities, geographically isolated tribes facing transportation and recruitment issues, and general funding problems. Poverty and a lack of resources can also make self-determination difficult, hindering the effective management of healthcare services.

Is the IHS an entitlement program, and how is it funded?

No, the IHS is not an entitlement program, insurance program, or established benefit program. It receives funding as allocated by the United States Congress, meaning its budget is subject to annual appropriations.

How does the IHS budget compare to other federal health programs in terms of cost per patient?

The average cost per patient for IHS is less than $3,000, which is significantly lower than the national average healthcare cost ($7,700) or the costs for Medicare ($12,000) and Medicaid ($6,200). This highlights a disparity in per-patient funding.

How did the Affordable Care Act (ACA) impact Native American healthcare and the IHS?

The ACA facilitated IHS Medicaid funding and authorized funding for residency training programs in tribal or IHS facilities through Teaching Health Centers (THCs). Many Native Americans stood to benefit from Medicaid expansion under the ACA, potentially increasing coverage and funding streams.

What is a key argument against relying on Medicaid to alleviate health inequalities for Native Americans?

Opponents argue that relying on Medicaid shifts responsibility away from the government's obligation to provide comprehensive health services. They contend it could intensify IHS underfunding as patients might seek private providers, rather than directly addressing the government's trust responsibility.

What are the current health disparities faced by Native Americans compared to the general U.S. population?

Native Americans have a life expectancy approximately 4.5 years shorter than the general U.S. population and face higher rates of chronic diseases like cancer, diabetes, and kidney disease. These disparities reflect ongoing challenges in achieving health equity.

What has been the trend in federal spending for IHS beneficiaries compared to Medicare beneficiaries over the past twenty years?

Over the past twenty years, the gap between spending on federally recognized American Indian/Alaska Natives and spending on Medicare beneficiaries has grown eightfold. This indicates a significant and widening disparity in per capita healthcare funding.

What challenges do IHS facilities face regarding physician coverage and board certification?

Data from 2014 showed that only 85% of IHS respondents had continuous physician coverage, and a median of only 13% of physicians were board-certified in emergency medicine. Many emergency departments reported operating at or over capacity, indicating staffing and resource challenges.

What is identified as a major obstacle for hiring and retaining staff in IHS clinics, particularly in remote locations?

A 2016 study found that the remote location of clinics was a significant obstacle for hiring and retaining staff. Issues like isolation, lack of amenities (shopping centers, schools, entertainment), also dissuade providers from accepting positions in these areas.

What criticism has the IHS faced since its establishment in 1955?

Since its beginnings, the IHS has been criticized by those it serves in medically underserved areas and by public officials for various issues related to care quality, access, and management, with some characterizing the care as 'genocidal' despite improvement efforts.

What are the primary reasons cited for the higher rates of chronic diseases in Native communities?

Higher rates of chronic diseases are attributed to the lack of public health infrastructure and the considerable distance many rural residents must travel to reach healthcare facilities. These factors contribute to delayed diagnosis and treatment.

What is the IHS's role in supporting students pursuing medical education?

The IHS provides support to students pursuing medical education through scholarships and programs like Indians Into Medicine (INMED). This support aims to increase the number of Native American healthcare professionals available to staff Indian health programs.

What does the IHS Indian Health Manual (IHM) contain regarding eligibility for non-Indians?

The IHM details the specific policies under which non-Indians can receive care. These include being the child of an eligible Indian, the spouse of an eligible Indian, or a non-Indian woman pregnant with an eligible Indian's child, outlining conditions for access.

What is the purpose of the IHS National Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee (NPTC)?

The NPTC regulates the IHS National Core Formulary (NCF) to ensure it reflects current clinical practices and literature. It reviews and revises the formulary quarterly based on evolving health needs, pharmacoeconomic analyses, and clinical guidelines.

What is the significance of the "Gold Book" in the history of the IHS?

The IHS's 1957 report to Congress, known as the "Gold Book" due to its cover color, presented the first comprehensive study of health conditions among Native Americans and Alaska Natives, along with recommendations for improvement. It served as a foundational document for understanding and addressing health needs.

How does the IHS's budget allocation compare to the needs of the Native American population it serves?

The text indicates that IHS programs are chronically underfunded. This underfunding leads to concerns among tribes about the sustainability of self-determination initiatives and the ability to provide adequate healthcare services, impacting overall health outcomes.

What is the "Nuka System of Care" and what are its core principles?

The Nuka System of Care is a patient-centered healthcare model developed by the Southcentral Foundation, emphasizing self-determined health service delivery and patient participation. Its core principles are "The one who helps you from the heart," "A state of peace and balance," "it belongs to you," and "Like family to me," focusing on holistic well-being.

What is the primary goal of the IHS in terms of health outcomes for Native Americans?

The IHS aims to improve the health of Native Americans by providing direct medical and public health services, advocating for their health needs, and working to reduce health disparities. Its overarching goal is to ensure comprehensive healthcare access and better health outcomes for these communities.

What is the role of the Public Health Service Commissioned Corps within the IHS?

The U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps is a uniformed service branch that provides many of the professional employees for the IHS, including physicians, nurses, dentists, and pharmacists. They are integral to staffing IHS facilities and delivering healthcare services.

Indian Health Service Wiki: Upholding Indigenous Health: A Comprehensive Study of the Indian Health Service

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Overview

Federal Mandate

The Indian Health Service (IHS) functions as a critical operating division within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Its primary responsibility is to provide direct medical and public health services to members of federally recognized Native American Tribes, encompassing both American Indian and Alaska Native populations. The IHS serves as the principal federal healthcare provider and advocate for these communities across the United States.^[1]^[2]

Scope of Reach

The IHS delivers essential healthcare services to approximately 2.2 million individuals of American Indian and Alaska Native descent residing in 37 states. As of recent data, this network comprises 26 hospitals, 59 health centers, and 32 health stations. Complementing these facilities, 33 urban Indian health projects offer a range of health and referral services. Many tribes also actively participate in the implementation of IHS programs or operate their own independent health systems.^[2]^[3]

Trust Responsibility

The provision of health services is rooted in the unique government-to-government relationship between the federal government and Native American tribes. This relationship, established by the U.S. Constitution and reinforced through treaties, laws, and court decisions, forms the basis of the federal trust responsibility to ensure the health and welfare of these indigenous populations.^[5]

Historical Context

Foundational Years

The federal government's involvement in Native American health services began in 1803, initially under the Department of War, later transitioning to the Office of Indian Affairs in 1824. The establishment of the Division of Indian Health in 1924 marked the hiring of field nurses and the placement of Public Health Service officers to address critical staffing shortages. Policy reforms, influenced by the 1928 Meriam Report, led to increased funding and the implementation of preventive medicine programs. However, funding and staffing declined during World War II, with post-war debates shaped by the Indian termination policy.^[6]^[7]

Formal Establishment

The Indian Health Service (IHS) was formally established in 1955, following the Indian Health Facilities Act (Transfer Act) of 1954. This legislation transferred departmental authority to the Public Health Service. Concurrently, a significant report detailed the health challenges faced by Alaska Natives, presenting the first comprehensive study and recommendations. The IHS's initial priorities were clear: assemble a competent health staff, establish adequate facilities, provide extensive curative treatment, and develop a robust prevention program.^[6]^[8]^[7]

Evolution and Policy

The agency's operational framework and service delivery have been significantly shaped by subsequent legislation. Key acts include the Snyder Act of 1921, providing the initial legislative authority for health services, and the Indian Health Care Improvement Act of 1976, which expanded funding for facility construction and aimed to increase the number of Native American healthcare professionals. The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975 (Public Law 93-638) further empowered tribal governments to administer IHS programs, fostering greater tribal control over healthcare delivery.^[3]^[13]

Services and Benefits

Direct Care Provision

The IHS directly provides a comprehensive array of health services through its network of facilities. These services span outpatient and inpatient care, including crucial areas such as pharmacy, dental care, behavioral health support, immunizations, pediatrics, physical rehabilitation, and optometry. Patients are advised to confirm specific service availability with their local IHS facility, as offerings can vary by location.^[41]

Purchased/Referred Care (PRC)

When patients require medical or dental care beyond the scope of IHS or tribal facilities, the Purchased/Referred Care (PRC) Program offers a pathway for coverage. However, due to funding limitations, PRC referrals are not automatically guaranteed. Authorization depends on factors such as confirmed AI/AN tribal affiliation, medical priority, and the availability of funds.^[44]^[45]

Workforce Development

Recognizing the need for a robust healthcare workforce within Native communities, the IHS actively supports Native American students pursuing health professions. Through various scholarship programs and initiatives like the Indians Into Medicine (INMED) program, the IHS aims to increase the representation of Native professionals in healthcare, thereby enhancing cultural competency and access to care.^[4]

Key Legislation

Early Frameworks

The legislative journey of IHS began with the Snyder Act of 1921, which provided the foundational authority for federal health services to Native Americans. Subsequent legislation, such as the Indian Health Facilities Act of 1954 (Transfer Act), facilitated the transfer of responsibility from the Bureau of Indian Affairs to the Public Health Service, leading to the formal creation of IHS in 1955. The Indian Facilities Act of 1957 and the Indian Sanitation and Facilities Act further authorized funding for hospital construction and essential sanitation infrastructure.^[3]^[6]

Self-Determination Era

The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975 (Public Law 93-638) represented a significant shift, empowering tribal governments to assume greater control over federal programs, including those administered by IHS. This act enabled tribes to enter into self-determination contracts, managing IHS funds and operations to better align healthcare services with community needs.^[3]^[6]

Improvement and Access

The Indian Health Care Improvement Act of 1976 (Public Law 94-437) aimed to enhance IHS services by expanding its budget, facilitating facility upgrades, and prioritizing sanitation improvements. Crucially, it also sought to improve healthcare access for urban Native populations and increase the number of Native American healthcare professionals. Amendments in 1980 further expanded access for urban residents through contracts with urban Indian health organizations.^[3]

Tribal Self-Determination

Empowerment Through Contracts

The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA) allows tribes to enter into "638 contracts," enabling them to manage IHS programs and funds directly. This approach fosters tribal sovereignty and allows for healthcare delivery tailored to specific community needs and cultural contexts.^[56]

Successes and Models

Tribal self-determination has yielded notable successes. The Cherokee Indian Hospital in North Carolina, for instance, adopted the "Nuka System of Care," a patient-centered model developed by the Southcentral Foundation in Alaska. This system emphasizes strong patient-provider relationships, community ownership, and integrated care, leading to improved patient satisfaction and health outcomes.^[57]^[58]

Concerns and Barriers

Despite successes, challenges persist. Some tribes express concern that contracting could lead to "termination by appropriation," fearing that reduced federal funding could undermine program sustainability. Chronic underfunding of IHS programs and a lack of administrative capacity or geographic isolation can also present significant barriers to effective tribal self-determination in healthcare.^[59]^[60]

Budget and Funding

Allocation and Comparison

The IHS operates on funding allocated by the U.S. Congress; it is not an entitlement program. In 2017, IHS funding was approximately $5.1 billion. Notably, the per-patient cost within IHS is significantly lower than national averages or other major federal health programs like Medicaid and Medicare. Proposed budget reductions have raised concerns about fulfilling the agency's mandate.^[63]^[64]

Affordable Care Act Impact

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has influenced IHS operations, particularly concerning Medicaid expansion. Many Native Americans stand to benefit from expanded Medicaid coverage, which can supplement IHS funding. However, reliance on Medicaid reimbursement raises concerns about potential shifts in patient care away from IHS facilities and the need for robust tribal consultation in policy development.^[65]

Funding Gaps

A persistent issue is the widening gap between federal spending on IHS beneficiaries and spending on Medicare recipients. This disparity impacts service rationing, exacerbates health disparities, and contributes to challenges in preventive care and overall health outcomes for Native American and Alaska Native populations.^[74]

Current Issues and Challenges

Life Expectancy and Disparities

Native Americans and Alaska Natives experience a life expectancy approximately 4.5 years shorter than the general U.S. population. They also face disproportionately higher rates of chronic diseases, including cancer, diabetes, and kidney disease. These disparities are compounded by inadequate public health infrastructure and significant distances to healthcare facilities, particularly for rural residents.^[1]^[70]

Workforce Shortages

Remote locations and challenges in hiring and retaining qualified healthcare professionals remain significant obstacles for IHS facilities. These vacancies can lead to reduced patient services, treatment delays, and negatively impact employee morale. Addressing these issues is crucial for ensuring consistent and quality care delivery.^[77]

Criticisms and Oversight

Since its inception, the IHS has faced criticism regarding the quality of care and accessibility, particularly in underserved areas. Issues such as management problems, lack of oversight in certain regions, and historical instances of mishandling accusations against staff have drawn scrutiny. Continuous efforts are underway to improve accountability and service delivery.^[15]^[80]

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio

Click here to open the "Indian Health Service" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about indian_health_service while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

injury prevention

the rules of the game play

kahi debe sandesh

umkhonto wesizwe

united states department of the army

electoral district of davidson

thomas taggart

politics of texas

connecticut public television

winona minnesota

References

Alaska area Retrieved 2011-04-08.

Albuquerque area Retrieved 2011-04-08.

Great Plains area Retrieved 2017-07-13.

Nashville area Retrieved 2011-04-08.

[1] Retrieved 2024-08-30.

Portland area Retrieved 2011-04-08.

US Department of Health and Human Services. (2016, October). INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE HOSPITALS: LONGSTANDING CHALLENGES WARRANT FOCUSED ATTENTION TO SUPPORT QUALITY CARE. Office of Inspector General. (OEI-06-14-00011).

United States Government Accountability Office. (2018, August). INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE: Agency Faces Ongoing Challenges Filling Provider Vacancies. Indian Health Service Workforce. (GAO-18-580).

A full list of references for this article are available at the Indian Health Service Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer

Important Notice

This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.

This is not medical advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for professional medical consultation, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of a qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this website.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.

Upholding Indigenous Health

💡 Dive in with Flashcard Learning! 💡

Overview ℹ️

🏛️ Federal Mandate

👥 Scope of Reach

🤝 Trust Responsibility

Historical Context 📜

📜 Foundational Years

➡️ Formal Establishment

📈 Evolution and Policy

Services and Benefits ⚕️

🏥 Direct Care Provision

➡️ Purchased/Referred Care (PRC)

🎓 Workforce Development

Key Legislation ⚖️

📜 Early Frameworks

🤝 Self-Determination Era

💡 Improvement and Access

Tribal Self-Determination 🤝

✅ Empowerment Through Contracts

🌟 Successes and Models

⚠️ Concerns and Barriers

Budget and Funding 💰

📊 Allocation and Comparison

📜 Affordable Care Act Impact

📉 Funding Gaps

Current Issues and Challenges ⚠️

⏳ Life Expectancy and Disparities

staffing Workforce Shortages

⚖️ Criticisms and Oversight

Teacher's Corner 🧑‍🏫

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

True or False? 🤔

❓ Test Your Knowledge! ❓

Gamer's Corner 🎮

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Explore More Topics

📜 Discover other topics to study!

References

📜 References

Feedback & Support 👍

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Disclaimer ⚠️

📜 Important Notice

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!

Overview

Federal Mandate

Scope of Reach

Trust Responsibility

Historical Context

Foundational Years

Formal Establishment

Evolution and Policy

Services and Benefits

Direct Care Provision

Purchased/Referred Care (PRC)

Workforce Development

Key Legislation

Early Frameworks

Self-Determination Era

Improvement and Access

Tribal Self-Determination

Empowerment Through Contracts

Successes and Models

Concerns and Barriers

Budget and Funding

Allocation and Comparison

Affordable Care Act Impact

Funding Gaps

Current Issues and Challenges

Life Expectancy and Disparities

Workforce Shortages

Criticisms and Oversight

Teacher's Corner

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Discover other topics to study!

References

Feedback & Support

Disclaimer

Important Notice