Unmasking the Pretendian
An academic exploration of Indigenous identity fraud, its societal impact, and the controversies surrounding its identification.
What is a Pretendian? ๐ Explore the Debate โ๏ธDive in with Flashcard Learning!
๐ฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ฎ
Definition
The Term "Pretendian"
The term "Pretendian" is a pejorative colloquialism used to describe individuals who engage in Indigenous identity fraud. It is a portmanteau derived from the words "pretend" and "Indian." A pretendian is fundamentally a non-Indigenous person who falsely and publicly claims an Indigenous identity.
Context and Scope
In the United States, this often involves individuals falsely claiming to be Native American. In Canada, the term applies to those who falsely claim to be First Nations, Mรฉtis, or Inuit. This practice is widely considered an extreme form of cultural appropriation.
Impact on Communities
When a pretendian asserts the ability to represent or speak for Indigenous communities to which they do not belong, it directly undermines tribal sovereignty and the principle of Indigenous self-determination. Such claims can misrepresent the authentic voices and experiences of Indigenous peoples.
Context and Impact
Stereotypes and Representation
The phenomenon of pretendians has been investigated for its role in promoting harmful stereotypes, typecasting, and the practice of "redface" within media and public life. APTN National News, for instance, explored how individuals in the film industry and beyond perpetuate these misrepresentations.
Academic Perspectives
Rebecca Nagle (Cherokee Nation) has articulated that pretendians directly challenge tribal sovereignty and self-determination by perpetuating the myth that Native identity is solely an individual choice rather than a community-based determination. She emphasizes the need to halt the dissemination of these false narratives.
Colonial Offense
Joy Harjo (Mvskoke), former U.S. Poet Laureate, has noted the complexities introduced by DNA testing, which can lead individuals to assert Native identity without cultural connection or community participation. She posits that such claims, particularly when they benefit individuals financially, represent a form of colonial offense, echoing historical patterns of exploitation.
Related Terminology
Expanding the Lexicon
The discourse surrounding Indigenous identity fraud has generated related terms that further define specific nuances of these claims and reactions:
- Defendian: An individual who actively defends those accused of being pretendians.
- Karendian: A person who critically calls out or challenges individuals suspected of pretendianism.
- Descendian: Refers to individuals with distant, trace Indigenous ancestry who may not be affiliated with or recognized by the Indigenous nation(s) with which they claim a connection. This term distinguishes them from those actively perpetuating fraud.
The "Alleged Pretendians List"
Genesis and Methodology
In January 2021, Navajo journalist Jacqueline Keeler initiated an investigation into settler self-Indigenization within academic circles. Collaborating with individuals in tribal enrollment departments, genealogists, and historians, Keeler researched public figures who had long been subjects of discussion within tribal communities regarding their claims to Indigenous identity. The research involved examining community connections and tracing family histories, sometimes back to the 17th century, to verify ancestral ties and tribal affiliations. This effort culminated in the self-publication of the "Alleged Pretendians List," a Google spreadsheet documenting approximately 200 public figures in academia and entertainment.
Support and Validation
While some, like artist Nadema Agard, have criticized Keeler's list as a "witch hunt," Native leaders interviewed by Voice of America, including Chief Ben Barnes of the Shawnee Tribe, have expressed strong support for Keeler's work within Indigenous circles. Academic Dina Gilio-Whitaker reviewed Keeler's documentation concerning Sacheen Littlefeather and found the research methodology to be sound.
Keeler's Clarification
Keeler has emphasized that the "Alleged Pretendians List" is not intended to target private citizens or casual "wannabes." Instead, it focuses on public figures who allegedly monetize or profit from their claims to tribal identity and who purport to speak on behalf of Indigenous tribes. She views the list as a product of decades of accountability efforts by Indigenous peoples.
TallBear's Analysis
Academic Kim TallBear has noted that the list highlights how the financial beneficiaries of pretendianism are predominantly white individuals, linking these false claims to white supremacy and Indigenous erasure. TallBear distinguishes these individuals from descendants who may be disconnected due to historical trauma or government programs (like the Sixties Scoop) but maintain genuine heritage and seek reconnection.
Debate and Controversy
Criticisms of the List
Skeptics of the "Alleged Pretendians List" have questioned its reliability, methodology, and Keeler's motivations. A statement released via Last Real Indians accused Keeler of exploiting the issue of Indigenous fraud for personal gain and weaponizing "lateral violence, colonial trauma, and colonial recognition" against individuals with whom she had disputes. Signatories argued Keeler positioned herself as a "self-appointed arbiter of Indian identity" and urged respect for tribal autonomy in determining citizenship.
Methodological Concerns
Lakota journalist Alexandra Watson stated her article was used as a reference on the list without her consent, questioning its methodology and utility. Angelina Newsom, a Northern Cheyenne journalist, criticized Keeler's research, particularly concerning the inclusion of verified tribal members like Ben Nighthorse Campbell and the alleged use of Ancestry.com records. Newsom raised concerns about privacy implications for relatives and argued that tribal nations, not individuals, should lead investigations into citizenship claims, asserting that Keeler's approach was not "safe for Indian Country."
Upholding Tribal Sovereignty
The debate underscores the critical importance of tribal sovereignty in matters of identity and membership. Critics argue that external lists and investigations, even if well-intentioned, can usurp the inherent right of Indigenous nations to define their own people and communities, potentially causing harm and division within "Indian Country."
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "Pretendian" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Educational Context and Limitations
This document has been generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended solely for informational and educational purposes. The content is derived from a snapshot of publicly available data, primarily from Wikipedia, and may not encompass the full complexity or nuance of the subject matter. It is not exhaustive and may not be entirely up-to-date.
This is not professional advice. The information presented here does not constitute legal, cultural, or identity-related advice. It is crucial to consult with recognized Indigenous community leaders, tribal governance bodies, and relevant academic experts for accurate and authoritative information regarding Indigenous identity, sovereignty, and related issues. Reliance on this AI-generated content for critical decisions or understanding is strongly discouraged.
The creators of this page assume no responsibility for any errors, omissions, or actions taken based on the information provided herein. The complexities of Indigenous identity are deeply rooted in community, history, and self-determination, which cannot be fully captured in this format.