The 1906 Russian Constitution
An examination of the Fundamental Laws that redefined the Russian Empire, transitioning from autocracy towards a constitutional framework amidst revolutionary upheaval.
Understand the Shift ๐ Key Articles ๐Dive in with Flashcard Learning!
๐ฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ฎ
Defining the New Order
From Autocracy to Constitutional Monarchy
The Russian Constitution of 1906, formally a revision of the 1832 Fundamental Laws, marked a significant constitutional milestone for the Russian Empire. It formally transitioned the state from an absolute monarchy to one where the Emperor consented to share autocratic power with a bicameral parliament, the State Duma and the State Council. This fundamental alteration was enacted on May 6 [O.S. April 23], 1906, preceding the inaugural session of the First State Duma.
The Emperor's Prerogatives
While establishing a legislative body, the constitution meticulously preserved substantial imperial authority. The Tsar retained an absolute veto over all legislation, the sole initiative for constitutional amendments, and the power to appoint and dismiss ministers. This ensured that while a semblance of shared governance was introduced, the ultimate executive and legislative control remained largely concentrated in the hands of the monarch.
Context of Revolution
Promulgated in the wake of the 1905 Revolution, the constitution was a strategic response by the imperial government to quell widespread unrest and prevent the empire's disintegration. It represented a last-ditch effort to appease liberal and revolutionary factions by introducing representative elements, albeit within a framework designed to safeguard the core structures of imperial power.
Imperial Governance Pre-1906
The Autocratic Tradition
Prior to 1906, the Russian Empire operated as an absolute monarchy. The Tsar's authority, codified in the 1832 Fundamental Laws by Mikhail Speransky, was virtually unlimited, constrained only by adherence to Orthodox faith and specific laws of succession. Institutions like the Governing Senate served administrative and judicial functions but lacked legislative power and remained entirely subordinate to the Tsar.
Early Reformist Efforts
Throughout the 18th and 19th centuries, various reform proposals emerged, including Alexander I's consideration of a privy committee for parliamentary reform and Alexander II's contemplation of elected commissions. However, these initiatives were often thwarted by conservative opposition or political events, such as Alexander II's assassination, which reinforced the commitment to autocracy under Alexander III and Nicholas II.
Seeds of Discontent
Nicholas II's adherence to absolute monarchy, despite increasing calls for reform, peasant unrest, and the rise of revolutionary movements, created a volatile political climate. Initial concessions, such as improved worker insurance and censorship reforms, proved insufficient for liberal elements demanding a constitution and a national legislative assembly, intensifying the pressure for fundamental change.
Catalyst for Change: 1905
War and Revolution
The disastrous outcome of the Russo-Japanese War (1904-1905) coupled with the tragic events of Bloody Sunday (January 1905), where imperial troops fired upon unarmed protesters, ignited widespread revolutionary fervor. This confluence of military defeat and internal dissent compelled the Tsarist regime to consider significant political reforms to maintain its existence.
The October Manifesto
Under immense pressure, Tsar Nicholas II issued the October Manifesto on October 30 [O.S. October 17], 1905. This decree promised fundamental civil rights and the establishment of an elected parliament, the State Duma. Count Sergei Witte, instrumental in negotiating the Treaty of Portsmouth, was appointed Chairman of the Council of Ministers and advocated for these reforms, with even Grand Duke Nicholas Nikolaevich threatening suicide if the Tsar refused.
Drafting and Ratification
Following the Manifesto, several drafts for revising the Fundamental Laws were prepared, drawing inspiration from constitutions of Austria-Hungary, Japan, and Prussia, as well as liberal proposals. The final version, largely based on Peter Kharitonov's draft with amendments strengthening imperial prerogatives, was officially published on May 6 [O.S. April 23], 1906. This act formally established Russia as a constitutional monarchy, though the extent of this constitutionalism would be continually contested.
Key Provisions of the 1906 Laws
Imperial Authority
The constitution designated the Emperor as the holder of "supreme sovereign power," inviolable and ordained by God. Key imperial prerogatives included:
- An absolute veto over all legislation.
- Legislative initiative on all matters, including constitutional amendments.
- Sole authority over foreign affairs, war declarations, and treaty negotiations.
- Supreme command of the armed forces.
- The right to appoint and dismiss ministers at will.
Bicameral Legislature
A bicameral parliament was established:
- State Council: The upper house, with half its members appointed by the Tsar and the other half elected by various state, clerical, and commercial bodies.
- State Duma: The lower house, elected by segments of the populace through a complex, weighted indirect system favoring property owners.
Both houses shared legislative initiative, but laws required approval from both, the Tsar, and the State Council. However, the Duma lacked control over ministerial appointments and dismissals.
Rights and Duties
The constitution guaranteed certain civil liberties, including protection against arbitrary arrest, inviolability of domicile, freedom of assembly, expression, and religion. It also mandated military service for all males and the payment of taxes. However, these rights were subject to limitations defined by law and imperial decree.
Legislative Process & Limitations
Laws required approval from the Emperor, State Council, and State Duma. Crucially, Article 87 allowed the Tsar to issue decrees during parliamentary recesses, which would lose validity if not confirmed by the Duma within two months. The Tsar's subsequent manipulation of electoral laws (violating Article 87) in 1907 significantly undermined the constitution's legitimacy.
The Constitution's Demise
Erosion of Trust
Nicholas II's dissatisfaction with the constitutional limitations and his unilateral alteration of electoral statutes in 1907 (the "Coup of June 1907") irrevocably damaged the credibility of the 1906 constitution. This action, seen as a violation of Article 87, fueled further revolutionary sentiment and solidified the perception of the constitution as a mere facade.
The Final Act
The escalating political instability, exacerbated by World War I, culminated in the February Revolution of 1917. Following Tsar Nicholas II's abdication, the Provisional Government, led by Alexander Kerensky, formally abolished the monarchy and, consequently, the 1906 Constitution on September 14 [O.S. September 1], 1917. This paved the way for the Bolshevik seizure of power and the establishment of a Soviet state.
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "Russian Constitution Of 1906" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
- Russian Fundamental Laws of 1906, Great Encyclopedia of Russian History.
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This document has been generated by an AI and is intended for educational and informational purposes only. The content is derived from publicly available data and aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the 1906 Russian Constitution.
This is not legal or historical advice. The information presented here should not substitute consultation with qualified historians, legal scholars, or political scientists. While efforts have been made to ensure accuracy based on the provided source, the AI cannot guarantee the completeness, timeliness, or absolute accuracy of the information. Always consult primary sources and expert analysis for critical research.
The creators of this page are not liable for any errors, omissions, or actions taken based on the information provided.