A War Within a War
An academic analysis of the complex and tragic conflict between former allies, the Bosnian Croats and Bosniaks, during the broader Bosnian War of 1992-1994.
Examine the Origins 👇 Analyze Key Battles ⚔️Dive in with Flashcard Learning!
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮
Political Background & Rising Tensions
The Rise of Nationalist Parties
The first free elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina in November 1990 marked a seismic shift in the political landscape, bringing three nationalist parties to power. These were the Bosniak-led Party of Democratic Action (SDA) under Alija Izetbegović, the Serbian Democratic Party (SDS) led by Radovan Karadžić, and the Croatian Democratic Union of Bosnia and Herzegovina (HDZ BiH) under Stjepan Kljuić. This power-sharing arrangement, while initially functional, laid the groundwork for future divisions along ethnic lines as the crisis in Yugoslavia deepened.
Serbian Ambitions & JNA Armament
Throughout 1990 and 1991, Serbs in both Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina proclaimed several "Serbian Autonomous Regions." Their explicit goal was to unify these territories into a "Greater Serbia." This movement was heavily supported by the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA), which began arming Bosnian Serbs and organizing them into militias as early as September 1990. By March 1991, the JNA had distributed tens of thousands of firearms to Serb paramilitaries and the SDS, creating a formidable military force loyal to Serbian nationalist goals.
Croatian Aspirations & Herzeg-Bosnia
Parallel to Serbian ambitions, Croatian leadership under President Franjo Tuđman harbored its own territorial goals, envisioning a "Greater Croatia" based on the 1939 Banovina of Croatia borders. This led to a dual policy: publicly supporting Bosnian unity while privately pursuing partition. A pivotal moment was the meeting between Tuđman and Serbian President Slobodan Milošević in Karađorđevo in March 1991, where the division of Bosnia and Herzegovina was reportedly discussed. This strategy culminated in the establishment of the Croatian Community of Herzeg-Bosnia in November 1991, an autonomous entity that, while not officially secessionist, operated with its own police, army, and currency, and was closely aligned with Zagreb.
The Unraveling Alliance
A Fragile United Front
Following Bosnia and Herzegovina's independence referendum in early 1992, the Bosnian War began. The Bosnian Serb Army (VRS), backed by the JNA, quickly seized control of 70% of the country. In response, Bosnian Croats formed the Croatian Defence Council (HVO) and the Bosniak-led government formed the Army of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina (ARBiH). Initially, these two forces formed a crucial alliance, fighting together against the VRS. Their combined efforts, particularly in mid-1992, were instrumental in breaking the siege of Mostar and preventing a total Serb victory.
Secret Deals and Growing Mistrust
Despite the military alliance, mutual trust was scarce. Both sides held separate discussions with the Serbs, fueling suspicion. In May 1992, HVO leader Mate Boban and SDS leader Radovan Karadžić met in Graz, Austria, and reached an agreement on a ceasefire and the territorial division of Bosnia. Although the agreement quickly fell apart, it severely damaged Croat-Bosniak relations. The Sarajevo government, struggling to organize its forces, had to rely on the better-equipped HVO, yet the HVO refused to be integrated into the ARBiH command structure, deepening the rift.
The Fall of HOS
A significant factor in the deteriorating alliance was the Croatian Defence Forces (HOS), a paramilitary wing of the far-right Croatian Party of Rights. HOS, which included both Croats and Bosniaks, supported Bosnian territorial integrity and cooperated with both the ARBiH and HVO. However, its pro-Bosnian stance clashed with the separatist goals of the HVO leadership. In August 1992, HOS commander Blaž Kraljević and his staff were assassinated by HVO soldiers. Following his death, the HOS was disbanded, with its forces absorbed into either the HVO or ARBiH, effectively removing a key pro-unity Croat military force from the equation.
Escalation to Open Conflict
The First Clashes
The fragile alliance finally broke in October 1992. The first armed clash occurred in Novi Travnik over control of a gas station, quickly escalating into town-wide fighting. Days later, a more significant conflict erupted in Prozor, where HVO forces, after several days of fighting, took full control of the municipality, leading to the flight of the Bosniak population and the burning of their homes. These incidents were a prelude to the wider war, often sparked by disputes over military supplies, key facilities, and political power in mixed municipalities.
The Fall of Jajce and its Consequences
In late October 1992, the VRS captured the strategic town of Jajce. The inability of the ARBiH and HVO to form a cooperative defense was a primary reason for its fall. The defeat had severe consequences, triggering a massive refugee crisis. Thousands of Croat refugees fled to Herzegovina and Croatia, while approximately 20,000 Bosniak refugees poured into the HVO-held regions of central Bosnia. This dramatic demographic shift drastically increased ethnic tensions in towns like Bugojno and Travnik, where Croats suddenly found themselves a minority.
The Vance-Owen Peace Plan
In January 1993, the Vance-Owen Peace Plan was proposed, envisioning Bosnia's division into ten ethnically-based autonomous provinces. The Bosnian Croat leadership, whose designated provinces largely aligned with their territorial goals, accepted the plan and attempted to implement it unilaterally. They issued an ultimatum demanding that ARBiH units in designated Croat provinces either subordinate themselves to the HVO or withdraw. The Bosniak leadership rejected this, and the plan is widely seen as a catalyst that transformed localized clashes into an all-out war, as both sides fought to secure control over the territories allocated to them in the proposed maps.
Major Offensives and Atrocities
The Lašva Valley Campaign
In April 1993, the HVO launched a major offensive in the Lašva Valley of central Bosnia. The strategic goal was to connect several Croat-held towns and enclaves. This campaign involved a systematic campaign of ethnic cleansing against the Bosniak population. The most notorious event was the Ahmići massacre on 16 April, where HVO forces attacked the village, killing over 100 Bosniak civilians, including women and children, and destroying homes and the local mosque. The ICTY later classified these events as crimes against humanity.
The Siege of Mostar
The conflict fully engulfed Herzegovina in May 1993 with the start of the Siege of Mostar. The city was divided along the Neretva River, with the HVO controlling the west and the ARBiH holding the east. The ensuing nine-month siege was characterized by brutal urban warfare and intense artillery shelling by the HVO, which caused devastating damage to the eastern part of the city. During the siege, thousands of Bosniak men were interned in HVO-run camps like Heliodrom and Dretelj. The conflict in Mostar is infamously symbolized by the destruction of the historic Stari Most (Old Bridge) by HVO shelling in November 1993.
ARBiH Summer Offensives
By mid-1993, the ARBiH had grown in strength, particularly in central Bosnia, benefiting from a larger manpower pool and increased arms transfers. This allowed them to launch a series of successful offensives. In June, they captured the strategic town of Travnik, followed by Kakanj, triggering an exodus of tens of thousands of Croat civilians. In July, the ARBiH defeated the HVO in the Battle of Bugojno, consolidating their control over much of central Bosnia and completely isolating the Croat enclaves of the Lašva Valley from HVO-held territory in Herzegovina.
Operation Neretva '93
In September 1993, the ARBiH launched one of its largest operations, codenamed Neretva '93, on a 200km front from Gornji Vakuf to south of Mostar. The operation aimed to break the siege of East Mostar and recapture territory in Herzegovina. During this offensive, ARBiH forces committed massacres against Croat civilians and POWs in the villages of Grabovica and Uzdol. Despite initial gains, the offensive ultimately failed to achieve its primary strategic objectives, and the front lines in Herzegovina largely stabilized by October.
The Path to Peace
Winter Stalemate and Final Battles
By late 1993, the conflict had devolved into a brutal war of attrition, with both sides entrenched and exhausted. The HVO in central Bosnia was in a defensive stalemate, completely cut off and struggling for supplies. The ARBiH launched a major winter offensive in December 1993 and January 1994, aiming to split the Vitez enclave. The fighting was exceptionally fierce, particularly around the village of Križančevo selo, where dozens of Croat civilians and soldiers were killed. Despite some initial ARBiH breakthroughs, the HVO, with reorganized leadership, managed to repel the attacks and stabilize the front lines by February 1994.
The Washington Agreement
By early 1994, both sides faced significant military exhaustion and intense international pressure, particularly from the United States. The Clinton administration, seeking to simplify the conflict and create a stronger front against the Serbs, brokered negotiations in Washington, D.C. Under the threat of sanctions and international isolation, Croatian President Tuđman was compelled to abandon his partitionist policies and pressure the Herzeg-Bosnia leadership to negotiate. On 18 March 1994, Bosnian, Herzeg-Bosnian, and Croatian representatives signed the Washington Agreement, officially ending the Croat-Bosniak War.
Creation of the Federation
The Washington Agreement established the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, merging the territories held by the ARBiH and the HVO into a single entity divided into ten autonomous cantons. It also mandated the creation of a joint Army of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. This agreement fundamentally altered the strategic landscape of the Bosnian War, ending the destructive "war within a war" and re-establishing the Croat-Bosniak military alliance. This renewed cooperation was critical in the subsequent joint military operations of 1995 that shifted the military balance against the VRS and paved the way for the Dayton Agreement.
Aftermath and Legacy
War Crimes Prosecutions
The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) prosecuted numerous officials from both sides for crimes committed during the conflict. Seventeen Bosnian Croat officials were convicted, including the six most senior leaders of Herzeg-Bosnia (the "Prlić et al." case), who were found to be part of a joint criminal enterprise with Croatian President Franjo Tuđman to ethnically cleanse Bosniaks from territories intended for a "Greater Croatia." Two senior Bosniak officials were also convicted on the basis of command responsibility for crimes committed by their subordinates, including mujahideen fighters.
Lasting Divisions
The war left deep scars and lasting divisions. The Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, established by the Washington Agreement and confirmed by the Dayton Agreement, often failed to function as a unified entity. For years after the war, parallel Herzeg-Bosnia structures persisted, particularly in education, finance, and public utilities, subsidized by Croatia. The ethnic cleansing that occurred during the war created homogenous areas, and the return of refugees to their homes in mixed-canton municipalities like Jajce, Stolac, and Travnik was often obstructed and met with violence for years after the peace agreement.
Casualties and Destruction
While precise figures are difficult to ascertain, the conflict resulted in thousands of military and civilian casualties on both sides. In Central Bosnia and the Neretva region, where the fighting was most intense, over 10,000 people were killed in 1993 alone. The war also saw the systematic destruction of cultural and religious heritage. HVO forces damaged or destroyed over 200 mosques, while ARBiH forces damaged or destroyed dozens of Catholic churches. The most iconic symbol of this destruction was the 16th-century Stari Most in Mostar, a UNESCO World Heritage site.
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "Croat U2013bosniak War" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
- ICTY: HadžihasanoviÄ & Kubura Case Information Sheet
- MagaÅ¡ & ŽaniÄ 2001, p. 355.
- KordiÄ & Äerkez Judgement 2001, p. 141.
- KordiÄ & Äerkez Judgement 2001, p. 142.
- MagaÅ¡ & ŽaniÄ 2001, p. 358.
- MagaÅ¡ & ŽaniÄ 2001, p. 170.
- Prlic et al. judgement vol.6 2013, pp. 396â397.
- KordiÄ & Äerkez Judgement 2001, pp. 153â154.
- MagaÅ¡ & ŽaniÄ 2001, p. 175.
- UdoviÄki & Å titkovac 2000, p. 192.
- Hadzihasanovic & Kubura Judgement Summary 2006, p. 3.
- MagaÅ¡ & ŽaniÄ 2001, p. 107.
- BlaskiÄ Judgement Summary 2000, p. 5.
- KordiÄ & Äerkez Judgement 2001, p. 170.
- MagaÅ¡ & ŽaniÄ 2001, p. 366.
- Hadzihasanovic & Kubura Judgement Summary 2006, p. 5.
- KordiÄ & Äerkez Appeals Judgement Summary 2004, p. 7.
- KlemenÄiÄ, Pratt & Schofield 1994, p. 49.
- KlemenÄiÄ, Pratt & Schofield 1994, p. 50.
- Naletilic & Martinovic Judgement 2003, p. 7.
- Prlic et al. judgement vol.4 2013, pp. 8â9.
- Hadzihasanovic & Kubura Judgement Summary 2006, p. 6.
- KordiÄ & Äerkez Judgement 2001, pp. 226â227.
- Naletilic & Martinovic Judgement 2003, p. 13.
- KordiÄ & Äerkez Appeals Judgement Summary 2004, pp. 150â153.
- Hadzihasanovic & Kubura Judgement Summary 2006, p. 8.
- Gasal, Kukavica and Dautovic Case Information 2011.
- Halilovic Judgement Summary 2005, pp. 3â4.
- International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia & PrliÄ et al. CIS, p. 6.
- KlemenÄiÄ, Pratt & Schofield 1994, pp. 57â59.
- MagaÅ¡ & ŽaniÄ 2001, p. 369.
- KlemenÄiÄ, Pratt & Schofield 1994, p. 59.
- International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia & 29 May 2013.
- Prlic et al. judgement vol.6 2013, pp. 212, 374, 377.
- Islam and Bosnia: Conflict Resolution and Foreign Policy in Multi-Ethnic States, Maya Shatzmiller, p. 100, 2002
- TataloviÄ & JakeÅ¡eviÄ 2008, pp. 140â141.
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.
This is not professional historical or political advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for scholarly research or consultation with qualified historians, political scientists, or legal experts. The Yugoslav Wars are a complex and sensitive topic, and this page represents a simplified overview. Always consult multiple academic sources for a comprehensive understanding. Never disregard professional advice because of something you have read on this website.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.