This interactive document analyzes US Presidential election data, drawing from Wikipedia's comprehensive article on popular vote margins. Explore the source article here. (opens in new tab)

The Electoral Divide

An analytical journey through historical US presidential election data, exploring the nuances of popular vote outcomes and their impact on electoral mandates.

Understand the Data 👇 View Election Table 📈

Dive in with Flashcard Learning!


When you are ready...
🎮 Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game🎮

Understanding the Popular Vote

The Popular Vote Explained

In United States presidential elections, the popular vote represents the total number or percentage of votes cast for a candidate by individual voters across all states and Washington D.C. While often seen as a direct measure of public preference, it does not determine the election outcome. The nation's president and vice president are elected via an indirect process through the Electoral College.

Indirect Election Mechanism

The U.S. Constitution establishes an indirect election system. Voters cast ballots on Election Day not directly for a candidate, but for electors pledged to a candidate. These electors then formally elect the president and vice president. This system has led to instances where the candidate winning the popular vote did not win the presidency, a phenomenon that has occurred five times in U.S. history, most recently in 2016.

Historical Evolution of Voting

Historically, the method of selecting presidential electors has varied. While most states now use a popular vote system, earlier elections saw state legislatures appointing electors directly. The 1824 election marked the first comprehensive recording and reporting of the popular vote. Since the 1988 election, a notable trend has emerged: presidential elections have consistently been decided by single-digit popular vote margins, indicating increasingly close contests.

Historical Context and Trends

Popular Vote vs. Electoral College

The divergence between the popular vote winner and the Electoral College victor is a recurring theme in American political history. The Twelfth Amendment (1804) formalized the separate voting for president and vice president by electors. While state legislatures historically appointed electors, the practice shifted towards popular vote selection, with South Carolina being the last state to use legislative appointment in 1860. The period since 1988 has seen a sustained trend of closely contested popular votes, highlighting the competitive nature of modern presidential elections.

Key Elections and Outcomes

Several elections stand out for their unique outcomes regarding the popular vote. The 1824 election is noted as the first fully recorded popular vote contest. Nineteen presidential elections have resulted in a candidate winning the presidency without securing a majority of the national popular vote. The consistent trend of single-digit popular vote margins since 1988 underscores the increasing competitiveness and the critical role of electoral strategy beyond the national popular tally.

Presidential Election Data: Popular Vote Margins

Election Results Table

The following table details United States presidential elections, focusing on the popular vote margin, electoral college results, and key candidates. This data provides a quantitative perspective on the historical dynamics of presidential contests.

Key
Parties:   Federalist •   Democratic-Republican •   National Republican •   Whig •   Democratic •   Republican •   Progressive •   Independent
Vote outcomes:    Winner received only a plurality of the popular vote •    Winner lost the popular vote •    Winner chosen by the House of Representatives
Election Winner and party Electoral College Popular vote Runner-up and party Turnout[9]
Votes % % Margin Votes Margin
1788–89 George Washington Ind. 69/69 100% 100% 100% 43,782 43,782 No candidate[a] 11.6%
1792 Ind. 132/132 28,579 28,579 6.3%
1796 John Adams Fed. 71/138 51.45% 53.45% 6.90% 35,726 4,611 Thomas Jefferson D-R[b] 20.1%
1800 Thomas Jefferson D-R 73/138 52.90% 61.43% 22.86% 41,330 15,378 Aaron Burr D-R[c] 32.3%
1804 Thomas Jefferson D-R 162/176 92.05% 72.79% 45.58% 104,110 65,191 Charles C. Pinckney Fed. 23.8%
1808 James Madison D-R 122/175 69.72% 64.74% 32.33% 124,732 62,301 Charles C. Pinckney Fed. 36.8%
1812 D-R 128/217 58.99% 50.37% 2.74% 140,431 7,650 DeWitt Clinton D-R[d] 40.4%
1816 James Monroe D-R 183/217 84.33% 68.16% 37.24% 76,592 41,852 Rufus King Fed. 23.5%
1820 D-R 231/232 99.57% 80.61% 64.69% 87,343 69,878 John Quincy Adams D-R[e] 10.1%
1824 John Quincy Adams D-R 84/261 32.18% 30.92% −10.44% 113,142 −38,221 Andrew Jackson D-R[f] 26.9%
1828 Andrew Jackson Dem. 178/261 68.20% 55.93% 12.25% 642,806 140,839 John Quincy Adams NR 57.3%
1832 Dem. 219/286 76.57% 54.74% 17.81% 702,735 228,628 Henry Clay Whig 57.0%
1836 Martin Van Buren Dem. 170/294 57.82% 50.79% 14.20% 763,291 213,384 William Henry Harrison Whig 56.5%
1840 William Henry Harrison Whig 234/294 79.59% 52.87% 6.05% 1,275,583 145,938 Martin Van Buren Dem. 80.3%
1844 James K. Polk Dem. 170/275 61.82% 49.54% 1.45% 1,339,570 39,413 Henry Clay Whig 79.2%
1848 Zachary Taylor Whig 163/290 56.21% 47.28% 4.79% 1,360,235 137,882 Lewis Cass Dem. 72.8%
1852 Franklin Pierce Dem. 254/296 85.81% 50.83% 6.95% 1,605,943 219,525 Winfield Scott Whig 69.5%
1856 James Buchanan Dem. 174/296 58.78% 45.29% 12.20% 1,835,140 494,472 John C. Frémont Rep. 79.4%
1860 Abraham Lincoln Rep. 180/303 59.41% 39.65% 10.13% 1,855,993 474,049 John C. Breckinridge Dem.[g] 81.8%
1864 Abraham Lincoln Rep. 212/233 90.99% 55.03% 10.08% 2,211,317 405,090 George B. McClellan Dem. 76.3%
1868 Ulysses S. Grant Rep. 214/294 72.79% 52.66% 5.32% 3,013,790 304,810 Horatio Seymour Dem. 80.9%
1872 Rep. 286/352 81.25% 55.58% 11.80% 3,597,439 763,729 Thomas A. Hendricks Dem.[h] 72.1%
1876 Rutherford B. Hayes Rep. 185/369 50.14% 47.92% −3.00% 4,034,142 −252,666 Samuel J. Tilden Dem. 82.6%
1880 James A. Garfield Rep. 214/369 57.99% 48.31% 0.09% 4,453,337 1,898 Winfield Scott Hancock Dem. 80.5%
1884 Grover Cleveland Dem. 219/401 54.61% 48.85% 0.57% 4,914,482 57,579 James G. Blaine Rep. 78.2%
1888 Benjamin Harrison Rep. 233/401 58.10% 47.80% −0.83% 5,443,892 −90,596 Grover Cleveland Dem. 80.5%
1892 Grover Cleveland Dem. 277/444 62.39% 46.02% 3.01% 5,553,898 363,099 Benjamin Harrison Rep. 75.8%
1896 William McKinley Rep. 271/447 60.63% 51.02% 4.31% 7,112,138 601,331 William Jennings Bryan Dem. 79.6%
1900 Rep. 292/447 65.23% 51.64% 6.12% 7,228,864 857,932 Dem. 73.7%
1904 Theodore Roosevelt Rep. 336/476 70.59% 56.42% 18.83% 7,630,557 2,546,677 Alton Brooks Parker Dem. 65.5%
1908 William Howard Taft Rep. 321/483 66.46% 51.57% 8.53% 7,678,335 1,269,356 William Jennings Bryan Dem. 65.7%
1912 Woodrow Wilson Dem. 435/531 81.92% 41.84% 14.44% 6,296,284 2,173,563 Theodore Roosevelt Prog. 59.0%
1916 Dem. 277/531 52.17% 49.24% 3.12% 9,126,868 578,140 Charles Evans Hughes Rep. 61.8%
1920 Warren G. Harding Rep. 404/531 76.08% 60.32% 26.17% 16,144,093 7,004,432 James M. Cox Dem. 49.2%
1924 Calvin Coolidge Rep. 382/531 71.94% 54.04% 25.22% 15,723,789 7,337,547 John W. Davis Dem. 48.9%
1928 Herbert Hoover Rep. 444/531 83.62% 58.21% 17.41% 21,427,123 6,411,659 Al Smith Dem. 56.9%
1932 Franklin D. Roosevelt Dem. 472/531 88.89% 57.41% 17.76% 22,821,277 7,060,023 Herbert Hoover Rep. 56.9%
1936 Dem. 523/531 98.49% 60.80% 24.26% 27,752,648 11,070,786 Alf Landon Rep. 61.0%
1940 Dem. 449/531 84.56% 54.74% 9.96% 27,313,945 4,966,201 Wendell Willkie Rep. 62.4%
1944 Dem. 432/531 81.36% 53.39% 7.50% 25,612,916 3,594,987 Thomas E. Dewey Rep. 55.9%
1948 Harry S. Truman Dem. 303/531 57.06% 49.55% 4.48% 24,179,347 2,188,055 Thomas E. Dewey Rep. 52.2%
1952 Dwight D. Eisenhower Rep. 442/531 83.24% 55.18% 10.85% 34,075,529 6,700,439 Adlai Stevenson II Dem. 62.3%
1956 Rep. 457/531 86.06% 57.37% 15.40% 35,579,180 9,551,152 Dem. 60.2%
1960[i] John F. Kennedy Dem. 303/537 56.42% 49.72% 0.17% 34,220,984 112,827 Richard Nixon Rep. 63.8%
1964 Lyndon B. Johnson Dem. 486/538 90.33% 61.05% 22.58% 43,129,040 15,953,286 Barry Goldwater Rep. 62.8%
1968 Richard Nixon Rep. 301/538 55.95% 43.42% 0.70% 31,783,783 511,944 Hubert Humphrey Dem. 62.5%
1972 Richard Nixon Rep. 520/538 96.65% 60.67% 23.15% 47,168,710 17,995,488 George McGovern Dem. 56.2%
1976 Jimmy Carter Dem. 297/538 55.20% 50.08% 2.06% 40,831,881 1,683,247 Gerald Ford Rep. 54.8%
1980 Ronald Reagan Rep. 489/538 90.89% 50.75% 9.74% 43,903,230 8,422,115 Jimmy Carter Dem. 54.2%
1984 Rep. 525/538 97.58% 58.77% 18.21% 54,455,472 16,878,120 Walter Mondale Dem. 55.2%
1988 George H. W. Bush Rep. 426/538 79.18% 53.37% 7.72% 48,886,597 7,077,121 Michael Dukakis Dem. 52.8%
1992 Bill Clinton Dem. 370/538 68.77% 43.01% 5.56% 44,909,889 5,805,339 George H. W. Bush Rep. 58.1%
1996 Dem. 379/538 70.45% 49.23% 8.51% 47,401,185 8,203,716 Bob Dole Rep. 51.7%
2000 George W. Bush Rep. 271/538 50.47% 47.87% −0.51% 50,456,002 −543,895 Al Gore Dem. 54.2%
2004 George W. Bush Rep. 286/538 53.16% 50.73% 2.46% 62,040,610 3,012,166 John Kerry Dem. 60.1%
2008 Barack Obama Dem. 365/538 67.84% 52.93% 7.27% 69,498,516 9,550,193 John McCain Rep. 61.6%
2012 Dem. 332/538 61.71% 51.06% 3.86% 65,915,795 4,982,291 Mitt Romney Rep. 58.6%
2016 Donald Trump Rep. 304/538 56.50% 46.09% −2.09% 62,984,828 −2,868,686 Hillary Clinton Dem. 60.1%
2020 Joe Biden Dem. 306/538 56.88% 51.31% 4.45% 81,283,501 7,059,526 Donald Trump Rep. 66.6%
2024 Donald Trump Rep. 312/538 57.99% 49.80% 1.48% 77,302,580 2,284,967 Kamala Harris Dem. 64.1%

Interpreting the Margins

Popular Vote vs. Electoral Mandate

The popular vote margin provides a crucial metric for understanding the breadth of a candidate's support. However, the Electoral College system means that a narrow popular vote victory can translate into a decisive electoral victory, or conversely, a popular vote win can be overturned by the electoral count. Analyzing these margins reveals the complexities of achieving a presidential mandate.

The Trend of Close Elections

The data indicates a significant trend towards closer popular vote margins in recent decades. Since the 1988 election, every presidential contest has been decided by a single-digit percentage point difference in the popular vote. This suggests a highly polarized electorate and a strategic importance placed on winning specific states rather than solely focusing on the national popular vote total.

Elections with Divergent Outcomes

The instances where the popular vote winner did not win the presidency are particularly noteworthy. These elections, such as 2000 and 2016, highlight the potential disconnect between the national popular will and the electoral outcome. Such results often spark debate about the fairness and representativeness of the Electoral College system.

Broader Political Context

Related Electoral Concepts

Understanding popular vote margins is enhanced by examining related electoral concepts. These include the mechanics of the Electoral College, the impact of state-by-state results, the role of third-party candidates, and the historical evolution of voting rights and methods. The data presented here serves as a foundation for deeper analysis into these interconnected areas of American political science.

  • List of United States presidential candidates by number of votes received
  • List of United States presidential elections by Electoral College margin
  • List of United States presidential elections in which the winner lost the popular vote
  • National Popular Vote Interstate Compact

Foundational Resources

Further academic inquiry into presidential elections can be supported by consulting key resources. These include detailed analyses of campaign strategies, historical voting patterns, and the constitutional framework governing elections. The following bibliography and external links offer pathways for advanced study.

  • Leip, David. Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections.
  • Peters, Gerhard. Voter Turnout in Presidential Elections.
  • How close were U.S. Presidential Elections? - Michael Sheppard, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Teacher's Corner

Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Edit and Print Materials from this study in the wiki2web studio
Click here to open the "List Of United States Presidential Elections By Popular Vote Margin" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit

Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.

True or False?

Test Your Knowledge!

Gamer's Corner

Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Learn about list_of_united_states_presidential_elections_by_popular_vote_margin while playing the wiki2web Clarity Challenge game.
Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!

Play now

Explore More Topics

Discover other topics to study!

william m. r. french
    
cain velasquez
    
national council of negro women
    
joe bisenius
    
plasma cell
    
albert portas
    
thaba tshwane
    
islamic foundation bangladesh
    
immanuel kant
    
seizure
    

References

References

  1.  Washington ran unopposed and was unanimously elected in both elections; John Adams received the majority of electors' second votes and became vice-president.
  2.  Jefferson became vice-president, as both Adams's and Jefferson's electors split over their choices for vice-president.
  3.  Jackson won a plurality of electoral votes (99 compared to Adams's 84) but lost due to Adams securing a majority of state delegations in the contingent election.
  4.  Breckinridge was the runner up in the electoral vote, while Stephen A. Douglas was the runner up in the popular vote.
  5.  McPherson, J. (2001). To the Best of My Ability: The American Presidents. Dorling Kindersly Publishing.
A full list of references for this article are available at the List of United States presidential elections by popular vote margin Wikipedia page

Feedback & Support

To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.

Academic Disclaimer

Important Notice for Scholars

This document has been generated by an AI for educational and analytical purposes, drawing exclusively from provided source material. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy and adherence to the source, it is intended as a supplementary resource for higher education students and researchers.

This content does not constitute political, historical, or electoral advice. The information presented is based on data available at a specific point in time and may not reflect the most current analyses or interpretations. Users are encouraged to consult primary sources and peer-reviewed academic literature for comprehensive and up-to-date understanding.

The creators of this page are not responsible for any interpretations, decisions, or actions taken based on the information provided herein.