The Enigma of Extrasensory Perception
A scholarly examination of the historical claims, cultural impact, and scientific scrutiny surrounding alleged psychic phenomena.
What is a Psychic? ๐ Scientific View ๐ฌDive in with Flashcard Learning!
๐ฎ Play the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge Game๐ฎ
Defining "Psychic"
Beyond Normal Senses
A "psychic" refers to an individual who purports to possess abilities rooted in parapsychology, such as extrasensory perception (ESP). These abilities are claimed to allow them to access information hidden from conventional senses, particularly through telepathy (mind-to-mind communication) or clairvoyance (perceiving events or objects without sensory input). Additionally, some psychics claim to perform actions seemingly inexplicable by natural laws, such as psychokinesis (moving objects with the mind) or teleportation (instantaneous travel).[a]
Roles and Manifestations
The realm of psychics encompasses a diverse array of roles. Some operate as theatrical performers, employing techniques like prestidigitation, cold reading, and hot reading to create the illusion of psychic powers for entertainment. Beyond entertainment, a significant industry exists where individuals marketed as psychics offer advice and counsel to clients, often for a fee.[1] Notable figures often cited in popular culture include Edgar Cayce, Ingo Swann, Peter Hurkos, Miss Cleo, John Edward, Sylvia Browne, and Tyler Henry.[2] The concept of psychic abilities extends to specialized practices such as psychic detectives, psychic archaeology, and even psychic surgery.[3]
Scientific Scrutiny
Despite widespread belief in psychic abilities among the general public, the overwhelming scientific consensus is that there is no empirical evidence to substantiate the existence of such powers. Consequently, the practice is largely categorized as pseudoscience.[4] Critics often attribute claimed psychic phenomena to deliberate deception or self-delusion.[5] A landmark report published by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences in 1988 concluded that 130 years of research provided "no scientific justification... for the existence of parapsychological phenomena."[8] More recently, a 2012 study attempting to replicate experiments supporting precognition "failed to produce significant effects," further indicating a lack of support for psychic ability.[9]
Historical Roots
Ancient Seers and Prophets
The concept of individuals possessing extraordinary perceptive abilities dates back to antiquity. Elaborate systems of divination and fortune-telling, such as astrology, were prevalent in early civilizations, with practitioners believing celestial positions could reveal insights and predict futures.[12] Beyond these systems, some individuals, known as seers or prophets, were believed to make predictions through direct apprehension or visions. These figures often held significant functional roles as advisors, priests, and judges, as seen in biblical accounts (e.g., Samuel in 1 Samuel 9) and ancient Egyptian and Assyrian cultures.[11][13]
Modern Spiritualism and Theosophy
The mid-19th century saw the rise of Modern Spiritualism in the United States and the United Kingdom. This movement was characterized by the belief that mediums could contact the spirits of the deceased to provide guidance to the living, often fueled by anecdotal accounts of psychic powers.[21] A prominent figure was Daniel Dunglas Home, known for his reported abilities to levitate and communicate with the dead during the Victorian era.[22]
Following Spiritualism, groups like the Theosophical Society emerged, co-founded in 1875 by Helena Blavatsky. Theosophy blended spiritualist concepts with Eastern mysticism, becoming influential in the early 20th century and later impacting the New Age movement. Blavatsky herself claimed numerous psychic abilities.[23]
Etymological Origins
The term "psychic" itself originates from the Greek word psychikos, meaning "of the mind" or "mental," and is linked to the human mind or psyche. The Greek root psyche literally means "breath," derived from ps\u0233\u0301chein, "to breathe or to blow," hence "to live."[10] The French astronomer and spiritualist Camille Flammarion is credited with first using the word "psychic," which was subsequently introduced into the English language by Edward William Cox in the 1870s.[11] By the late 20th century, psychics became widely associated with New Age culture, with psychic readings and advertising becoming commonplace through various channels.[24][25]
Public Beliefs
Surveying Public Opinion
Public belief in psychic abilities remains a notable phenomenon. A 1990 survey of members of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences revealed that only 2% believed extrasensory perception had been scientifically demonstrated, with another 2% considering it to occur sometimes. While 22% thought research in the field should be discouraged, 63% felt it should be allowed but not actively encouraged. Neuroscientists, in particular, displayed the most skepticism towards parapsychology.[26][27]
American Perspectives
A 2005 Gallup Organization survey on paranormal topics in the United States found significant belief levels: 41% of respondents believed in extrasensory perception, 26% in clairvoyance, and 31% in telepathy or psychic communication.[28] This indicates a substantial portion of the population holds beliefs in these phenomena.
Education and Belief
Interestingly, a 2006 poll of 439 college students by researchers Bryan Farha and Gary Steward suggested a correlation between higher education levels and belief in psychic phenomena. College seniors (31%) and graduate students (34%) were more likely to believe than freshmen (23%). However, science students generally showed lower belief compared to those in social science and education fields.[29][30]
Beyond general belief, there's a popular notion that anyone can develop psychic abilities through practices like meditation and divination, with numerous resources dedicated to teaching these methods.[31] Another common belief is that psychic ability can be hereditary, passed down from parent to child.[32]
Scientific Critique
Parapsychological Research
Parapsychological research has employed various experimental designs to investigate psychic claims. These include using random number generators to test for psychokinesis, mild sensory deprivation in the Ganzfeld experiment to assess extrasensory perception, and government-contracted trials to explore remote viewing.[4] However, critics like Ed J. Gracely argue that the evidence gathered is insufficient for scientific acceptance, partly due to the inherently low intrinsic probability of psychic phenomena.[4]
Methodological Flaws
Leading skeptics such as Ray Hyman and institutions like the National Science Foundation contend that parapsychology suffers from significant methodological flaws. These flaws, they suggest, can account for experimental results that parapsychologists attribute to paranormal explanations. A critical issue is the consistent lack of replication of results by independent experimenters, leading many to classify the field as pseudoscience.[33][34][35][36][37]
Neuroimaging Studies
In a significant 2008 study utilizing neuroimaging (fMRI), researchers sought to resolve the "psi debate" by creating optimal experimental conditions, including emotionally related participants (e.g., twins) and appropriate emotional stimuli. Despite these efforts, the study found no distinguishable neuronal responses between psychic stimuli and non-psychic stimuli. The researchers concluded that these findings represented "the strongest evidence yet obtained against the existence of paranormal mental phenomena."[41] (It is worth noting that James Alcock cautioned against the definitive wording of this statement).[42]
The Shadow of Fraud
Financial Exploitation
Psychic fraud represents a serious concern, with victims sometimes losing their entire life savings. One reported case involved an Ontario woman, Marie Jean, who, while depressed, paid a psychic named Maha Dev $46,000 to remove "evil spirits" that allegedly threatened her and her sons. The money was refunded only after CTV News intervened.[47] Another instance highlighted a woman who lost $41,642 over ten weeks to a psychic, leading her to seek help from private investigator Bob Nygaard, who specializes in psychic fraud cases.[48][49][50]
Challenges in Prosecution
Prosecuting psychic fraud as a criminal offense can be challenging. Victims often report being turned away by law enforcement, who may categorize such incidents as civil matters. Investigator Rob Palmer notes that famous psychics like Thomas John have been exposed as frauds, yet the legal system struggles to address these cases effectively.[48]
Deceptive Tactics
Ben Radford, an investigator, explains that scammers employ various psychological principles to ensnare victims. They exploit a client's vulnerable state of mind, their belief in psychic abilities, and their desire for answers to life's problems. Psychics often instruct clients not to disclose their involvement to friends or family, sometimes threatening that "magic will not work or get worse" if they do. These con games can span weeks, months, or even years, with the goal of extracting as much money as possible. Victims, once they realize they've been scammed, are often too embarrassed to come forward.[51] Skeptical activist Susan Gerbic has extensively documented many of these deceptive techniques.[52]
The Great Australian Psychic Prediction Project
A Decade of Scrutiny
Richard Saunders, Chief Investigator for the Australian Skeptics and host of The Skeptic Zone podcast, initiated "The Great Australian Psychic Prediction Project" to scientifically evaluate the accuracy of self-proclaimed psychics. Over 12 years, Saunders and an international team of skeptics meticulously collected and vetted every published psychic prediction in Australia from 2000 to 2020.[45]
The Results
The project analyzed over 3,800 predictions made by 207 psychics. These predictions covered a wide range of topics, including celebrities, scandals, natural disasters, weather patterns, sports, and real estate trends, with some predictions extending beyond Australia.[46] The findings were stark:
- Correct: 11% of predictions
- Wrong: 35% of predictions
- Too Vague: 19% of predictions
- Obvious/Expected: 15% of predictions
- Uncategorized: 2% of predictions
Conclusive Findings
The project's main conclusions unequivocally stated:[45]
- "Psychics are appallingly bad at predicting future events."
- "Most predictions were too vague, expected, or simply wrong."
- "Most of what happens is not predicted, and most of what is predicted does not happen."
This comprehensive study confirmed that individuals claiming to foresee the future do not achieve a success rate better than that of educated guesswork, chance, or sheer luck, even when accounting for a margin of error.[46]
Teacher's Corner
Edit and Print this course in the Wiki2Web Teacher Studio

Click here to open the "Psychic" Wiki2Web Studio curriculum kit
Use the free Wiki2web Studio to generate printable flashcards, worksheets, exams, and export your materials as a web page or an interactive game.
True or False?
Test Your Knowledge!
Gamer's Corner
Are you ready for the Wiki2Web Clarity Challenge?

Unlock the mystery image and prove your knowledge by earning trophies. This simple game is addictively fun and is a great way to learn!
Play now
References
References
- Wendy Haskett Psychic Fairs Aim for Aura of Fun in Mind Reading LATimes.com, August 15, 1987
- McConnell, R.A., and Clark, T.K. (1991). "National Academy of Sciences' Opinion on Parapsychology" Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 85, 333รขยย365.
Feedback & Support
To report an issue with this page, or to find out ways to support the mission, please click here.
Disclaimer
Important Notice
This page was generated by an Artificial Intelligence and is intended for informational and educational purposes only. The content is based on a snapshot of publicly available data from Wikipedia and may not be entirely accurate, complete, or up-to-date.
This is not scientific or professional advice. The information provided on this website is not a substitute for rigorous scientific inquiry, critical thinking, or consultation with qualified professionals in fields such as psychology, parapsychology, or fraud investigation. Always refer to reputable academic sources and exercise critical judgment when evaluating claims of psychic phenomena. Never disregard established scientific consensus because of something you have read on this website.
The creators of this page are not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for any actions taken based on the information provided herein.